/b/ - Random

Anything Goes


[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply Return
Säge
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.


02/27/20 IRC/Matrix/and Discord servers are now available, join here.
02/09/20 /ausneets/ has been added!
11/23/19 Donations can now be made via PayPal, thank you for all of your support!
11/21/19 We have successfully migrated to LynxChan 2.3.0, to see all of the changes to 16chan, click here.


[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

Fuck all of you Anonymous 06/07/2020 (Sun) 04:20:42 ID:ae77ad No. 11157
You can fuck right off if you use slurs and pejoratives instread of using neutral language. You can fuck right off if you make blanket judgements about groups of people rather than being specific and conservative with your words. You can fuck right off if you want to solve your problems with another system of law that explicitly discriminates against a group of people in any way. You can fuck right off if you do not oppose any acts of aggression/force towards individuals or groups who do not pose an immediate threat (to yourself or to others), whether by the state or private individuals/groups. And, if you do not oppose such forms of action as described in the sentence above being taken towards the property of others, you, too, can fuck right off. I want a system that does not make distinctiins between its people, and levies hut one set of rules for all to live by. A place where everyone has every opportunity and where all are judged solely by their actions. A place where those with the best ability thrive and those whose performance is lacklustre will not be a burden on those who so not wish to make a sacrifice for their sake. Allow me to share my vision in full, once again, and i will meet your criticisms with my best arguement for how and why i beleive my policies are the ideal societal goals to advocate for. I am proposing a political solution that will be a spanner in the works. I am not an egalitarian, but a social darwinist -style meritocrat. I am aware of racial differences, but also that group genetics can change over a few generations in a new environment, evolution makes changes in any population based on what genetic traits survive and pass themselves on to the next generation. The european revolution saw major changes to iq occur in a short period of time, due to evironmental pressures o want to recreate this event with my policies. I implore you to read everything i write carefully, as in this thread there will be those who will criticize a position i do not support, as a means of making a strawman out of my proposals.
ok retard
>>11157 You've been reading these threads >>29004 >>27883 Most of the laws that you support are already applied in the west in theory. It's already written on our constitution. Unfortunately money is corrupting these laws and capitalism decides which are the best individuals through corruption, nepotism, bribery, luck, and dick sucking. In order for a meritocratic system to work is required a egalitarian law and opportunity system to test every individual. People under 21 should be part of a egalitarian school system so they can get the same opportunities. After concluding they should apply to the career that they better qualify in their studies. Socialism gives the same opportunities but fail to value the best qualified individuals over others and removes their freedom. Korea and Japan are one of the few exceptions where an individual is chosen through their skills rather than luck. These Asians are not white, they in fact are more closely related to Africans than whites. And if you compare them to white Russians, you will understand that being white doesn't always means being productive. But at the same time they are a heavily ethnically homogeneous race in a way that Germans could never achieve. Hitler admired the Japanese more than Russians or British considering the fact that they were not white. Japanese are a genetically mix from two different tribes (one coming from Korea) and have been adapting their mixed genes through many centuries. These mixed genes turned them into a stronger race in a way. The unmixed genes that they left in Korea turned more homogeneous but that did not make their country stronger or better developed since they were easily occupied by Japanese forces in the past. So being White or Homogeneous is not necessarily as good as the sentimentalist neck beards on these boards have been preaching. But living in an egalitarian law and opportunity society that place different individuals from every race and country in their respective places inside and not outside that society. Because once you remove an individual or race from a society they will conspire against it, by illegal immigration and activities. Because the least fortunate individuals will always use their productive skills to try to benefit from better developed societies in any way possible. They should be free to live in the society that they want to. But there should be a system to equally evaluate even those outside that society in order to make the best ones from outside to compete to the ones inside. Unfortunately Japan and Korea restrict hard working foreigners from being part of their society. But still try to take the most advantage of their labor skills without giving much return. The least these foreign workers can do is spend their high currency money in their low currency country once they retire. Their laws makes sense considering their population density inside their country. But they should apply equal laws to foreigners to slowly replace the worst individuals from their society to the best from other races and countries so they can have a better mix of genes in the future and help their country to grow even more stronger. They already do some of this by giving citizenship for the best foreign athletes in their sports team in order to compete internationally.
(70.11 KB 550x550 428732cdsjfa3.png)
>>11157 >>11159 ok, nigger
>>11157 >You can fuck right off if you use slurs and pejoratives instread of using neutral language. Slurs and pejoratives capture the essence of everything negative about X. It's called verbal efficiency. >You can fuck right off if you make blanket judgements about groups of people Those blanked judgments are based on overwhelming data >You can fuck right off if you want to solve your problems with another system of law that explicitly discriminates against a group of people in any way. No, I don't want a system that discriminates against a group of people, I don't even want to see those "people" in my system. >any acts of aggression/force towards individuals or groups who do not pose an immediate threat (to yourself or to others) Immediate threat is a key word here. Since good (white) genes are recessive, and since subhumans breed at a much higher rate, subhumans pose an existential threat to my people. They are also much more likely to become an immediate threat to me due to their animal nature. Direct threat, not to mention reducing my life quality to their level and thus chances for survival. Much higher risk, literally zero benefit. Only negative consequences. Even if not a physical threat, their very existence is extremely ... distasteful. The way they look, the way they smell, the way they behave, the way they think ... Being forced to tolerate such abominations is an act of abuse. And we were never given a choice by the so called "liberal" entities. That being said, I do not endorse any unlawful acts, since you phrased it so nicely :>) In fact, I consider direct violence to be counter-productive to our cause. >but also that group genetics can change over a few generations in a new environment Why would we help genetic trash become less trash rather than refining what's already good? Efficiency wise, getting rid of subhumans would be a far more rational solution.
>>11159 >It's already written on our constitution That applied only to white people originally >Unfortunately money is corrupting these laws You can't corrupt laws, if money is corrupting them, it means that they weren't good to begin with. Delusions can't last for very long. >Korea and Japan are one of the few exceptions where an individual is chosen through their skills. Wew, Japan is extremely nepotistic, they even had a tradition where when a man retires, his son gets offered the position. Korea is a ZOG social experiment, and they are not exactly making anything of actual value. You could hardly find a more disgusting, artificial, plastic society on earth. Koreans are even more oppressed by their gov't than the Chinks, it's just more insidious. > they in fact are more closely related to Africans than whites This is what niggers actually believe >being white doesn't always means being productive Towards what ends and whose benefits? Productivity as an end into itself is a Jewish meme where they evaluate goyim based on how much they can leech on them. That's also the idea behind universalist "meritocracy" , technocracy, pushed by neo-Marxist, Talmudic abominations like the EU. It recognizes no values other than feeding the machine. >Hitler admired the Japanese more than Russians or British They were not ruled by kikes, unlike the Russians or the British, he was looking at the bigger picture because he knew who the real enemy is. Is Japan your only example? >Because once you remove an individual or race from a society they will conspire against it, by illegal immigration and activities. They will do it anyway because that's how nature works. Egalitarian delusions only ruined whites in the end. >Unfortunately Japan and Korea restrict hard working foreigners from being part of their society Maybe they don't want to go extinct as well? >so they can have a better mix of genes in the future Even if you get a "genius" nigger, his offspring are very likely to be low iq ghetto coons. You have no idea how genetics work. Also, hybrid vigor is a kike meme that only applies to closely genetically related populations (Think Germans and French), not for mixing with literal animals and hoping to produce something that's not going to be an animal. >They already do some of this by giving citizenship for the best foreign athletes in their sports team in order to compete internationally. That's because Jews run the sport business and they are trying to make subhumans more appealing to natives by making them part of group identity, national sports being a good example of that. They also profit by buying those animals cheap and then reselling them to various clubs. If your nation sucks at a certain sport, it should come to terms with it and focus on something that it's good at.
>>11161 Slurs and pejoratives are not even an argument, is just childish whinnying. Overwhelming data is a better argument though but they never mean 100% and even the 1% should be considered. A system of law that explicitly discriminate people it's fine as long these people are judged individually by their actions. This is how a perfect modern system should be. And just in case you disagree. And think that a whole group act the same way then you would have nothing to worry about. Because this system would deal with all of them but individually. Your worst fear is that one of them could become better than you. So you try to defend yourself by saying that your people is better. Thanks to your primitive mindset you think having recessive gene puts your people in a existential disadvantage but this would only happen if they lived in a natural environment formed by tribes not in a modern political system formed by society. If your people (individually) prove to be more qualified this system will help them support their children financially better than the subhumans that breeds more. So in this case they would be reduced due to the lack of financial support that this system would provide them individually. And the few of them that are better qualified would breed instead. But if you think the entire group should be removed all because of your own sentimentalism and disgust than this system should deal with you instead
>>11163 >Slurs and pejoratives are not even an argument They are compressed arguments. Why over-elaborate rather simple things. You can write a thesis on the matter without actually saying anything more than what's expressed with a single word. Nigger. Faggot. Subhuman. The essence of your kind summed up with a single word. You do not, in fact, warrant anything more. Do you explain yourself to your dog? No, you shout at it simple commands that it can understand. The only reason why you non-persons even consider yourselves human is because our enemies are using you as a biological weapon against us. Do not think, even for a second, that they appreciate you more. >but they never mean 100% and even the 1% should be considered You are trying to use 1% to justify the other 99%. That's not how it works. And that 1%, does not, in fact, offer anything more than what a racially homogeneous society would have to offer. Europeans were doing more than well without your kind, in fact, they were doing considerably better. Yes, a lot of whites are trash, a majority of them nonetheless, but they have their utility. And the worst of them used to be naturally eliminated until a certain gang of hook nosed bandits took control of white societies and started appointing the lowest gutter of society to be the nameless rulers of (((technocratic))) governments. Your only utility is being cheaper meat for the kikes. Rotten meat, but cheaper. >Your worst fear is that one of them could become better than you. Is this what they tell you at your (((oppression))) indoctrination? You wouldn't even survive in a truly meritocratic system, as such would have a radically different definition and structure of society than the one your Talmudic masters have presented to you. Your only "merit" is being cheaper meat for ZOG. >Thanks to your primitive mindset Mindset based on natural law and reason, not based on someone's pilpul and delusions. Primitive mindsets have shown to be vastly superior to modern ones. And no amount of historical revisionism can change that. You are praying in a wrong church my nigger. But i get it, you kind of realize that without whitey, you are utterly screwed, so you want whitey to fix things for you, but while allowing you to piggyback on it. >a modern political system formed by Jews for the sole benefit of the Jews Fix'd >this system will help them support their children financially And who would get to determine that? The omniscient state? The same one that does the exact opposite right now, in the name of the very same "ideals" which you keep promoting? >this system should deal with you instead How dare I protest against this mindless abomination worshiped by dimwits of all creeds while they get exploited in unison. So much for your arguments.
>>11162 >That applied only to white people originally The concept of race does not exist in the constitution. >You can't corrupt laws, if money is corrupting them Money can change any law but not the constitution at least >Wew, Japan is extremely nepotistic All I said is that in these countries people require more commitment to improve their skills. These Asian countries got the hardest university entrance exams to prove that. >This is what niggers actually believe In fact their flat noses skin pigmentation proves that. And they found a tribe in Africa that resembles Asians and links to them. >Towards what ends and whose benefits? Your society >Is Japan your only example? Japan have a longer history than Germany. He was probably trying to learn their samurai code. >They will do it anyway because that's how nature works. They will do it if you let them do it. This is why society should deal with them first. >Maybe they don't want to go extinct as well? If they keep removing foreign workers from their society their economy could help them go extinct. >You have no idea how genetics work. And you think that a racial population of millions are all like clones. You could have kids with a white midget or retard and expect them to turn better? >That's because Jews run the sport business and they are trying to make subhumans more appealing to natives by making them part of group identity, If this is the case why the "subhumans" perform better than the natives
the first part is like something jews would say right off twitter. so you are either a jew or a nigger. im not going to fuck off, you fuck off pleb
>>11166 Its even worse than a jew or nigger. Its a Libertarian.
>>11164 >Nigger. Faggot. Subhuman. The essence of your kind summed up with a single word. You do not, in fact, warrant anything more. This is you spiting your slurs to judge someone you don't even know. This tells more about you than me. I'm not even offended by that. >You are trying to use 1% to justify the other 99%. That's not how it works. And that 1%, does not, in fact, offer anything more than what a racially homogeneous society would have to offer. >until a certain gang of hook nosed bandits took control of white societies And this gang were only 1% percent controlling your 99% homogeneous society. So the 1% should be considered then? >And who would get to determine that? The omniscient state? A better state created by a better society through a better system
>>11171 >This is you spiting your slurs to judge someone you don't even know. Ok, what's the percentage of at least one of those being true? Once you understand that, you will understand how important setting yourself apart is. > I'm not even offended by that. Don't misunderstand my spiteful attitude as an attempt to offend >So the 1% should be considered then? Well, they did not exactly contribute anything, just brought ruin and extinction. And it was a far higher percentage of Jewish population than 1%. >A better state created by a better society For whom?
>>11174 >this poster must be of group X to be posting like that First of all. I've been called of kike, chink, nigger in many arguments I have been posting. When in fact I'm not even American. Who I am is no important to the discussion. You should focus more on the content and less on the author. This is an anonymous board with no country flags. The fact that you totally missed my identity proves how much your group discrimination methodology is frail. A better selection system based on individuals and not on groups would define better what's the percentage to be true and separate the good from the bad in all groups including your and mine. Perhaps you would be afraid to be selected as bad and for this defend yourself by claiming your entire group is better. But I have no group sentimentalism based on race, religion, or nationality or even care what other group you or any other consider me to be from. As long there is a fair selection system based on individual actions that may defend society as a whole not as a group. With a system like that no group would be able to hurt another group, because every individual from every group would be judged accordingly. >For whom? No one yet. First we need a better system so we can have a better society that can select better leaders. If you're interested in what race, nationality group most of them may be part of. I believe mostly would be Asians, as I mentioned above, they have a higher IQ than whites in most of their tests. And they also proved to be more productive and independent than your and every western kind (even those that you hate) that can do no other better thing than blame others for their mistakes.
Some sentimentalist jannie felt personally offended and have hidden this thread from the catalog in less than one day. For me this is no different from group selection without any individual judgement. But is a good thing because it means I won my argument against their childish attackers. I still thank him for not removing this hidden thread completely (yet). I have a whole bunch of posts related to what I said spread over this abandoned board. So I don't even see much difference removing only this one
>>11190 it wasn't hidden, you fucking retarded faggot. it got moved to b, which is essentially pol's toilet on this website. you can't win an argument if your OP is shit. get fucked and go cry elsewhere, nigger
(89.71 KB 750x1176 ACCOMPLISHMENT.jpg)
(152.00 KB 1200x967 axMBgsy.jpg)
>>11187 It will be whites, IQ isn't everything, and whites have created more than the rest of the world's races put together.
(286.25 KB 974x1280 2ebxvk.jpg)
>>11157 gas the kikes, race war now
>>11157 OP >Fuck all of you Also OP >You can fuck right off if you use slurs and pejoratives Take your own advice nigger brainlet
(2.02 MB 1280x720 ClipboardImage.png)
>>11157 >OP Government System in the picture
>>11233 >1400-1950 old graphs that don't compare all the inventions Any crap can be considered an invention. And most of these might be plagiarized like they did with Tesla. Europe only started making better inventions when they had their industrial revolution, before this most inventions came from Asia and Arab countries. China was responsible for many inventions at this time including gun powder. Which whites used to shoot themselves in WWII. China now leads the rank over other countries in productivity and no white invention has changed that. The only thing european we wazers can do now to defend themselves is point to their past. Time has changed and other people is now running the game

Delete
Report


no cookies?