>Revenge is a good thing and no it isn't. It's to secure the protection and supremacy of our raace and put the sword and balance into the world. The only ones I've seen to hate ethno-globe are the ones who will inevitably be eliminated.
I've never said that I 'hate' ethnoglobe though. I don't think that it will ever happen, admittedly, but that is far from 'hating' the idea though. This said, from observing vehement ethnoglobe-posting here for the past year or so both here and on Anon Cafe, I still think that the idea that ethnoglobe is primarily utilized as a psychological coping mechanism and revenge fantasy in the same way that the character of Mizoguchi - a slave moralist through-and-through - did in Mishima's novel. This is regardless of the origin of the idea. It's the same thing with the DOTR.
>Nietzsche is a total faggot and loser.
One does not have to agree with every single aspect of a man's thought to realize that he had piercing insights on certain matters, and the topic of ressentiment is one of them.
>I've only read a tad of Nietzsche so I can't comment on that part
Start with 'Twilight of the Idols'
>Yes, I'm actually jealous and have a slave fantasy to finally reverse the natural order and get back to all those Hindpoos, Guatemalans, Aboriginals, Moroccans, Pakistanis and central Africans because of how wealthy, proud and powerful they are.
I'm glad you can admit it. That's the exact sort of psychological state that the Abrahamist has. Imagine yourself as an embattled Christian today. You look around and see the world wallowing in sin, degeneracy, atheism, idolatry and everything else abhorrent to God. But you have faith that one day Jesus will return in the clouds and annihilate everyone who has not obeyed the Gospel of Jesus Christ. In this day, the prosperous and powerful, who were careless in their sin and rebellion against God, will be punished, turned into hell and then YOU will become the powerful, the prosperous the happy. Shitskins are indeed privileged, powerful and proud in how they have gotten the protection of the Jews and Western states against White people. There's dialectical tension though. The White man burns with slave morality at the incoming non-Whites, but at the same time - this is the ironic part - the non-White himself is a slave moralist - he's certainly no master moralist! He's filled with envy against Whites. Every sight he sees around him is a testimony to White greatness. He feels inferior, like a loser, a subhuman. Yet he is a prospering and powerful subhuman.