/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

[Post a Reply]
[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply
Säge:
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.

08/28/20 Come and join our Matrix/IRC servers, the info can be found here.
[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(5.26 KB 226x223 varg stop watching porn.jpg)
/aag/ Anti-Abrahamism General 2 Blackshirt 09/12/2021 (Sun) 19:56:12 No. 13995
This thread is for combating and deprogramming individuals from jewish ideologies, particularly Christianity. Christianity is irreconcilable with White racial politics and National Socialism. It is necessarily universal in all respects, downplays the value of life, makes one worship a jew as their lord and savior, and worst of all preaches ethics fit for weaklings. The strong, beautiful, superior, etc are all denigrated before the jewish imposter god. It must be said that Christianity is among one the greatest enemies of racial regeneration, and cannot be viewed seperately from the problem of the JQ. I urge Christians to realize that they been deceived. Previous thread: >>1395 https://archive.fo/FyjjL
>>15920 > Imagine helping proto-Talmudic kikes who want to enslave you 'own le Christcucks'. God brought his attempts to naught and ended his life pathetic life. Yeah, imaging making tough choices in an effort to preserve your native traditions and empire. Totally retarded, right? Why not just let your people be plagued by a malignant semitic religion for thousands of years that causes us to fight religious wars with each other for nothing. Appreciation of the human and natural forms, stupid. Unbroken ancestro worship, gay. Having a positive outlook on humanity, retarded! We don't need any of that. We have yahweh, and he'll give us our little place as beasts of burden for the jews in the next world!
>>15920 >One cannot serve wealth and God. I guess one cannot serve his race and god, too, then. The christcuck reveals his true purpose once again.
>>15916 >What is the western wall? This is just pilpul. What he said came true, in that the temple and all of Jerusalem was laid to waste. One can easily say that Jesus was speaking hyperbolically. Anyone who has read the New Testament knows that Jesus taught using hyperbole and similar rhetorical tools. Matthew 18:9 is a good example of Jesus' use of hyperbole. He's saying the temple would be utterly destroyed, which is what happened, to the extent that the Jews have nothing but a wall to bang their head against in prayer today. Some have said that that wall is a remnant of a Roman temple too. >>15919 >I'm not going to take something seriously that you jews lie about. So you won't even read the passage. You're afraid to do the math for yourself and figure out that it actually happened. The rest of your post is not even worth my time, since you admit that you haven't even read the thing in question.
>>15921 I'm glad that you admit that pagans literally are willing to cooperate with Jews that think the goyim are animals made to serve the 'Chosen People'. You are the ultimate shabbos goy. 'I must rebuild the Temple for my Jewish masters, oy vey the prophecies are coming true!"
>>15924 >I'm glad that you admit that pagans literally are willing to cooperate with Jews that think the goyim are animals made to serve the 'Chosen People'. You are the ultimate shabbos goy. 'I must rebuild the Temple for my Jewish masters, oy vey the prophecies are coming true!" First of all, you literally want the third temple to be rebuild so that you can worship at it in the "new world". You literally follow jewish scriptures, and carry out the teachings of these jews whether from the old or new testament. Second of all, I do not agree with the actions of Julian in helping to rebuild the temple. I only appreciate the mettle he showed in defending his people and culture, something I'm sure you would not understand. >Anyone who has read the New Testament knows that Jesus taught using hyperbole and similar rhetorical tools. But I though it came true exactly s Jesus said, or are you lying to us? Can scripture just mean exactly what you want it to mean at any time? Doesn't seem like you respect the word of the son of yahweh very much.
>>15920 True unsaturated autism. >You have to be completely ignorant to say such a thing, just spend an afternoon reading St. John Chrysostom and what he said against the Jews, particularly in Adverus Judaeos. Pic related. St. Jerome also said: Empty words for a empty religion that never does what lie about being so proudly of. For example Constantine and the Theodosian Code >>Theodosian Code was translated into English, with annotations, in 1952 by Clyde Pharr and others <Books 1-5 lack the level of manuscript support available for books 6-16. The first five books of the surviving Codex draw largely from two other manuscripts. The Turin manuscript, also known as "T," consists of 43, largely discontinuous folios.[4] The second manuscript is the Breviary of Alaric, and a good part of the Breviarium that is included in book 1 actually contains the original text of the respective part of the original codex.[4] <The first laws granting tax exemption to the church appear in the Codex and are credited to Constantine and his son Constantius II. These laws specify that all clergy, their family members, and church-owned land was exempt from all compulsory service and tax payments, with the exception that land owned by the clerics themselves was still taxed.[23][24] Now Charlemagne: <‘Jewish merchants prospered under Charlemagne and even more under Louis the Pious, by supplying the court with wine, spices, and textiles, and they enjoyed wide-ranging privileges. These included the right to be tried only in accordance with their own law, to have Christian employees, and to practice their religion even within the Imperial palace.’ -Barbero, Op. Cit., p. 290 <‘The protection of subjects involved in international trade was one of the sovereign specific duties. In negotiations with King Offa of Mercia, Charlemagne requested favourable conditions for “our merchants” when operating in England. Later Louis the Pious granted the merchants who supplied the palace exemption from all taxes collected within the empire, with the exception of customs duties in Quentovic and other parts of the border.’ -Barbero, Op. Cit., p. 291 Two saints, two very powerful and notable christian being very Israeli-pilled here. Your saints claim that jews are dogs, but never do you christianiggers treat them as demons they are. Let's not forget the numerous times that you chose to slaughter native Europeans for being "goys", but many times gave the kikes free passes and only wanted to force convert them from the Torah to the NT. If your spirit is not Judaic, then you should prove and should that being the case by acknowledging that the jews are entirely separate in both spirit and race, but the christnigger did neither. Gentiles are only ever accepted if they are willingly to destroy their foundation for something Israeli. Again you're an idiot and the red-text and as said before, actions speak louder than words. >All I need to know. Imagine helping proto-Talmudic kikes who want to enslave you 'own le Christcucks'. But they weren't a thread to Rome, which is the part that you miss lmao. Also imagine if Christianity did not grow throughtout the empire, the kikes never would of been as powerful as they are today and had control over European civilization and the jews would be contained. Julian did this, because you wanted to destroy Rome. What's even funnier is that you are perfectly find christianity's Talmudic-like actions in taking over the empire and also are perfectly fine with the jews converting over to christiantiy to control over White Europeans. Siding the jews to own the pagans is literally your motto. >Even if one were to grant this, it's a genetic fallacy. One, you don't know what a fallacy is and two, christianity literally inspired capitalism way before the Protestants became a thing. >https://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-10-number-3/how-christianity-created-capitalism >It's purely Judaic Remember when you admitted that christianity was Judaic as well in the christian thread? Stop pretending you're any different. You are spiritually a jew and haven't proven otherwise. Nothing you spout will convince us to switch over to christianity, you aren't a saint and never were any of your "saints".
>>15925 >First of all, you literally want the third temple to be rebuild so that you can worship at it in the "new world". The idea that there will be a third temple at all is not a universal view. It is mostly held among certain types of Protestants. Plus, both Jesus and Paul transfer the imagery of the Temple onto both the body of believers (the body of Christ) and onto Jesus himself, as can be seen when Paul refers to the church, and indeed to individual Christians, as 'the temples of the Holy Spirit' (1 Cor. 3:16, 6:19). The example of Jesus referring to himself as a temple is in John 2:18-19: "Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days.” He's clearly referring to his death and resurrection here. So many believe that the need for the Temple has been completely superseded by the Church. However some believe because of some select prophecies that the Antichrist will sit in the Temple and declare himself God that there will indeed be a Third Temple in the future that will probably be occupied by a Jewish antichrist. >I only appreciate the mettle he showed in defending his people and culture Giving assistance to Talmudic Jews isn't defending your people and culture. >But I though it came true exactly s Jesus said The Temple was destroyed by foreign armies and sacrifices stopped. This is what Jesus predicted. Jesus referred to it there in a hyperbolic fashion. Hyperbole does not mean 'false'. >Can scripture just mean exactly what you want it to mean at any time? I think you just don't like that I have answers.
>>15927 >Giving assistance to Talmudic Jews isn't defending your people and culture. They were assisting them to stop (((you))). Again muh talmudic jews weren't trying to take over Rome, it was the reformed jews, you're scapegoating them in a scenario where they weren't even the villains of history just yet. If christians truly hated jews, then they would of sided with the Romans and accepted Rome for what she was, not take over the entire empire by appealing to those who hated the Romans and wanted to destroy it internally, and then allow the kikes to usurper power which is exactly what Constantine did by the way.
>>15923 >So you won't even read the passage. You're afraid to do the math for yourself and figure out There is no math, only lies and claims. Again no arguments just stupidity. Being a sperg does not mean you've won the argument it proves we are correct. http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/paul.htm
>>15927 >The example of Jesus referring to himself as a temple >Jesus and Paul transfer the imagery of the Temple onto both the body of believers This is the same thing as the talmudic third temple. A body of gentile "believers" is needed to wait hand and foot on their new jewish lords. You still seek the third temple, only in a different form. This is not any different. >Giving assistance to Talmudic Jews isn't defending your people and culture. No, he could have been like any of your jew loving saints instead, that facilitated the growth of jewish trade networks and jewish power. That would be better? Christianity facilitates the spread of jewish power because of its kinship with judaism . >Hyperbole does not mean 'false'. It does. If he had predicted it perfectly, it would have been completely annihilated, and yet it is not. So much for your prophecies. >I think you just don't like that I have answers. It's telling that you cannot answer this question. All that seems to matter to you is your jewish god, and not honor nor people.
>>15926 >the Theodosian Code Isn't pro-Jewish at all. I'm getting tired of this meme. Everyone who refers to this conveniently forgets that Jews hate that law code, took away the equal rights Jews had formerly, turning them into second-class citizens, barring them from military and civil service, prohibiting them from owning slaves, banning the construction of synagogues and many other things. Similarly Jews were forbidden from carrying out judicial sentences, and not permitted to be wardens of jails. This is readily available information to anyone who takes the time to read the code. Pagans had given Jews equal citizenship with Romans before this under Caracalla. >Charlemagne Not as black-and-White as you think it is. You're clearly unaware of Charlemagne's Capitulary for the Jews. Clearly giving the Jews the ability to lend money of any kind was a mistake. But one learns from the mistakes of a past. https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/814capitul-jews.asp >Two saints Charlemagne is not a Saint. And Theodosius II isn't recognized as a Saint except by Eastern Orthodox, but even then, that doesn't matter, because he did nothing wrong. The pro-Jewish narrative about the Codex Theodosianus is ludicrous. >But they weren't a thread to Rome You are implying that it is ever a good idea to ally with Talmudic Jews. You are a shabbos goy. >Julian did this, because you wanted to destroy Rome. The empire lasted until 1453 though. It was Christian longer than not.
>>15928 Stop defending literal Talmudists, retard. "you're scapegoating them" - you're literally sounding like an ADL kike right now. There's nothing to defend here
>>15929 You won't even read it because you're pre-presumed it to be false. Wallow in your ignorance. >>15930 >This is the same thing as the talmudic third temple. A body of gentile "believers" is needed to wait hand and foot on their new jewish lords. You still seek the third temple, only in a different form. This is not any different. You're literally just spouting bullshit. The Talmud has nothing to do with what is being spoken about here, as it wasn't a thing for centuries after Jesus and never had anything to do with Christianity, and there is nothing about serving 'jewish lords' in any of these texts. I wish you could at least argue in good faith, but none of you ever do. >It does. No, it doesn't. It means overstatement to make a rhetorical point. This is what Jesus did, and you were already provided evidence of this. The Temple was annihilated, right like the prophecy in Daniel 9 said, and just like Jesus said it would.
>>15933 >You won't read my bullshit! You're right. Either prove your passages are true or maximum cope.
>>15932 >samefagging How pathetic. But i'm right actually, there's no reason to hate talmuds when they weren't our enemies just yet. The war on the talmuds were a christian war not European. Retorting to samefagging is proof that you lost the argument to prove that christianity was not worse than Jews. >>15931 >Isn't pro-jewish at all Except for the fact that they allowed Jews to hold jobs concerning accounting, banking and as merchants? Jews were still give the right to have major influences on the Byzantine economy, which is why it fail. Also despite the codes barring Jews from civil services and the military you still have Andronikos II Palaiologos who tolerated them in the end. >Pagans had given Jews equal citizenship with Romans before this under Caracalla. You're making no point here, because Caracalla gave every freeman citizenship. Pagans were also very skeptical about giving just allowing anyone to become a citizen, especially Jews. >Charlemagne is not a Saint. Yes he is, he's not acknowledge by the Holy see, but he was in the Holy Roman Empire. But this means nothing, because he's still one of the most praised christians in the world and is viewed as the "savior" of Europe. >And Theodosius II isn't recognized as a Saint except by Eastern Orthodox Constantine is though and he was very pro-Jewish. Anyway what I said should of brought up was the codes that inspired Theodosius' codex. Despite their supposedly anti-Jewish laws, it did not stop them from having major influences within Christian European politics. You don't seem to realize that being anti-Jewish does not mean you're not Jewish, Marx debunks this mindset. >You are implying that it is ever a good idea to ally with Talmudic Jews. You are implying that Rome should of surrendered itself to early Christian Jews, which by the way lead to what Europe is today. Julian getting rid of the christians would of contained the jews either way. Prove to me that the "talmuds" were a threat to Rome. >The empire lasted until 1453 You're chronology and pilpuling is awful. No one should ever recognize the Christian empires as Roman successors, especially when they've acted nothing like it. Only you retards recognize those christian shit-holes as Roman, but pretend that Rome never fell, because of Christianity and died due to their inaction to rid of the jews. Byzantium wasn't Roman, just a bunch of christcuck Greeks LARPing.
>>15931 I don't see why any of you said matters, because a good sum of Christian Roman emperors have protected synagogues. I don't why the Theodosian Codex keeps being brought up as pro-Jewish rather than the fact that it was a failure, because in the end they were protected many times by other Byzantine emperors and the court for economic and political purposes. The Christian view on Jews is rather mixed, not of hatred nor one where they see themselves as an entirely different entity from them, despite what any priest or saint Christian says. It definitely shows when during the reinassiance and later that many Jews were viewed to be European or White by Christians, despite having Talmudic practices. On case of Julian the Apsotate, he was in the right, the Galileans sought to usurper the empire out of the native Latins. This was ulimately achieved through associating, socializing, and then converting slaves, women, and freeborns, who all worked and sought to destroy Rome or at-least take over her cultural norms (slaves being freed, women destroying the patriarchy, freeborns gaining more rights). This is quite literally worst than reviving the temples of a people who were only threatening to the Romans in the sense that their nationalism would lead to another mass revolt for their independence. No one is defending Talmuds for what they are, we are stating that it made sense to side with the enemy of my greater enemy to stop the horrendous social change the Roman Empire forever.
>>15933 >annihilated Lol. How could it be annihilated when there is a entire portion of it intact. Prophecy not fulfilled.
>>15936 >How pathetic Take your meds. Why defend the actions of Julian? He was clearly in the wrong. Never side with Jews of any variety.
>>15943 >Take your meds More cuckchan lingo. You are the same person. >Why defend the actions of Julian? He was clearly in the wrong. Ah yes, the guy who wanted to defend his heritage from christian jews was in the wrong. You're totally not the same guy who just used the same argument from earlier. >Never side with Jews of any variety. Ironic for a christian to say this, But he did that with purpose. His goal was to eliminate christianity and get former pagans back into his reformed version of Hellenicism and to do this was a temporary alliance to rid of the Galileans and send them back to where they came from. This was a strategic attack, to rid of jews and curtail christian influence. Julian shouldn't have revived their temples, but it wasn't like he had a choice anyway especially, when the empire was rumbling apart and society was collapsing. You're retorting to samefagging as your way of making me look bad, because I'm right?
>>15910 >we know that it [the second temple] was destroyed by a foreign army A foreign army led by a jew named (((Tiberius Alexander))). If it indeed happened at all, the sacking of the second temple is just another example of jewish self-fulfilled prophecy. Aside from that, he was related to noteworthy jews; his uncle was Philo of Alexandria, the jew who created the logos as son of God and as (((moshiach))) myth. Interestingly, Philo makes no mention of Jesus in any of his writings, despite supposedly living during the time of Jesus and having his theories confirmed. Pure coincidence, I'm sure. >muh prophecies Oh boy, I can't wait for the prophecies of Isaiah to come true! I'm so excited to be ruled over by jews through the supreme court of mankind! I'm getting fit just so I can better serve my jewish masters! Those fields won't till themselves!
>>15960 The first screencap about Philo is not the grand 'BTFO' that the writer thinks it is. Yes, the idea of the Logos was understood even pre-Jesus, and quite often identified with the Angel of the Lord that appears throughout the Old Testament. Philo believed that the Angel of the Lord was the Logos of God, and Christians believe the same thing. This Angel of the Lord is identified as divine in the Old Testament already (Genesis 16, Exodus 3, etc), so what we are really seeing here is the notion of the Holy Trinity even in the Old Testament. Instead of having an austere monotheism like modern Talmudic Jews had, some Hellenized Jewish thinks had ideas closer to the Christian conception of God. >the jew who created the logos as son of God and as (((moshiach))) myth. Philo didn't think that the Logos was the Messiah lol. >Isaiah chapter 60 and 61. This is referring to the Church, who is the new Israel. Isaiah 56:6-8 refers to foreigners joining themselves to God, that his house shall be a house of prayer for all nations, and that even more will be gathered to God. It's noteworthy to point out that the nations in Isaiah 60:3 are said to come to the light, which is referenced by Jesus in Matthew 5:14-16. The Psalms, of course, foretell an age when all of the world will come to God. Psalm 22:27-28. Psalm 86:8-10. Micah 4. And again, this never had anything to do with race. Esther 8:17 has Persians becoming Jews. Ruth was also a Moabite who joined Israel. The prohibitions against marriage with other groups were to keep the Israelites away from idolatry and paganism. Right after the reference of Deuteronomy 7:3 is a warning that if you intermarry with them they will bring you to worship their gods: "for they will turn your children away from following me to serve other gods, and the Lord’s anger will burn against you and will quickly destroy you. 5 This is what you are to do to them: Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones, cut down their Asherah poles[b] and burn their idols in the fire". Moses' wife wasn't even an Israelite either, and these warnings against intermarriage come from the books of Moses. Israelites were never biological. Once again you're projecting Talmudism onto the Old Testament. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersessionism All of those who did not become Christians will perish, this is what is meant when it says that all nations who do not submit will perish, just as all of humanity perished when God sent the Flood and Noah and his closest kin only survived because of the Ark.
>>15935 I can't prove them if you don't bother to read them, retard. >>15936 >Except for the fact that they allowed Jews to hold jobs concerning accounting, banking and as merchants? And no one ever said that this was a perfect law-code. It wasn't awful either. I know you will be mad at anything short of genocide, though, anyway. Jews were reduced in status under the law, kept them out of the military, kept them from buying slaves, kept from building synagogues, and kept out of the government except for one position that of tax collector - now you are going to say aha! but even this isn't too great for the Jew, since by Byzantine law, the decurio was required to make up any shortfall in tax revenues out of his own pocket. <From the 3rd century ad, when prosperity declined and the demands of the central government increased, responsibility for tax collection and liability for deficits gradually made their position difficult. https://www.britannica.com/topic/decurio Theodosius II was based. >You're making no point here, because Caracalla gave every freeman citizenship. Pagans were also very skeptical about giving just allowing anyone to become a citizen, especially Jews. Yet they gave Jews equal citizenship anyway, which they never should have been given. Given out any sort of equal citizenship under the law to everyone is pozzed. >but he was in the Holy Roman Empire. Who cares. >But this means nothing, because he's still one of the most praised christians in the world I never hear his name mentioned except from people online crying about him. They must be upset about the prohibitions he levied against the Jews involved in commerce and money-lending in his capitulary on the matter! >Constantine is though and he was very pro-Jewish Living in a fantasy land. <Constantine, newly converted to Christianity, was unsympathetic to Jews and during his reign passed several anti-Semitic laws. Jews were severely punished when they tried to rebuild their temple in Jerusalem. https://ehistory.osu.edu/biographies/flavius-valerius-constantinus-constantine-great <After his victory over Licinius, Constantine inaugurated a more and more hostile policy toward the Jews. It is true that as early as 321 a law was promulgated which made it obligatory for Jews to fill onerous, expensive municipal offices; while on the other hand such Jews as had devoted themselves to the service of their own religion were exempted in 330 from all public services, and those who were already "curiales" were freed from the levying of taxes. In 329, however, the Jews were forbidden to perform the rite of circumcision on slaves or to own Christian slaves; the death penalty was ordained for those who embraced the Jewish faith, as well as for Jews versed in the Law who aided them. On the other hand, Jewish converts to Christianity were protected against the fanaticism of their former coreligionists. Simultaneously with this an edict was issued forbidding marriages between Jews and Christians, and imposing the death penalty upon any Jew who should transgress this law. Some of these enactments were affirmed in 335. Noteworthy is the hostile language of several of these laws, in which Judaism is spoken of as an ignominious or as a bestial sect ("secta nefaria" or "feralis"). https://archive.fo/5GkkP (and before you attack the source blindly and commit another genetic fallacy, you better check the sources for the entry!) >rove to me that the "talmuds" were a threat to Rome. Prove they weren't, They're a pack of evil pedophiles who think that (you) are literally an animal made to serve them. Good goy. >You're chronology and pilpuling is awful. The Eastern Empire is still the Roman empire, as much as you want to deny it.
(21.60 KB 1058x232 On Grant 1.PNG)
(23.03 KB 1065x286 Grant 2.PNG)
>>15970 >And no one ever said that this was a perfect law-code. It wasn't awful either. No it was total garbage and it failed. You're still not getting it. If you are against Judaism you do not allow them to establish communities and have influence within your politics and economy. Christianity's view on jews are literally blue-pilled and is no different than how Marx claimed to hate his own people, but then has solutions and teaches his followers a kikery mindset. This sets an example that christians are too retarded to exterminate the people they claim to have a hatred for even after all they've done. Only destroying synagogues only for them to be revived by other christian rulers, exiles only for the jews to come back, and forced conversions as if that will stop them from being crypto-christians. >Yet they gave Jews equal citizenship anyway, which they never should have been given. They also gave it to loyal christians and other semitics, so your point is meaningless here. If anything by bringing up Caracalla's edict it only serves to prove my point that you don't give Abrahamics citizenship, you kill them and burn the bodies. The Romans learned the hard way, although their elites were corrupt anything so it should be expected. >Given out any sort of equal citizenship under the law to everyone is pozzed. I agree, but apparently you don't see that christcucks have been doing this type of shit for years, especially right after Constantine took over Rome and the only requirement was to be a loyal convert. I'm glad we can agree that something you guys have been doing for hundred of years and are still advocating today admit that you're a bunch of faggots and retards. >I never hear his name mentioned except from people online crying about him. Thou shalt not lie? He's literally beloved by cathtrads, he's one of the most commonly talked about figures within christian circles, especially when ever there is a debate between christians and muslims. >Constantine, newly converted to Christianity, was unsympathetic to Jews and during his reign passed several anti-Semitic laws. Jews were severely punished when they tried to rebuild their temple in Jerusalem. <Christian bishops and some other priests were granted exemptions from undertaking magistracies and other expensive services for their local community. The same privilege was later extended to Jewish rabbis and synagogue leaders. -How Rome Fell: Death of a Superpower Goldsworthy, Adrian p 198 <A few of Constantine’s pronouncements are overtly hostile to the Jews as the killers of Jesus, but his actions were not markedly more anti-Semitic than those of many earlier pagan emperors. The Jews were again forbidden to seek converts or to attack those of their own number who converted to Christianity. -ibid I looked at your first quote and there's nothing that leads back to definitive proof, but I went further in my research to see if that quote was legitimate and it seems that you have taken a random site as your source of information without even fact-checking it. Especially if you actually read back at Grant's account of Constantine, he's called out for being biased as pic describes. The only harsh thing Constantine did was forbade jews barring them from owning christian slaves, converting christians, and forced circumcisions. Also Your archive also doesn't give any sources at all, but it's funny that you used (((jewishencyclopedia))) as your argument that he was totally anti-semitic. There's a lack of evidence that the Edict Of Milian lead to jews losing rights, which are only claimed from jews themselves. They love to make themselves out to be the victims of everything after all and Constantine affects and changes from Rome has only ended up being good for the jew than it was under Hellenic Rome. >genetic fallacy It's not a genetic fallacy when I can prove that anything that comes from jews are inherently bad and you seem to kind of agree with me, although you don't agree and are in-denial when we tell you that jews have always been eternally evil since their birth. I'm the one that should be calling you out for it, because your previous post is just "muh bible!" and "well it felt real to me!' >Prove they weren't, <Y-you have to prove something I c-claimed! You're asking me to prove something that I have asked you to prove as per your claim that Julian was in the wrong. >They're a pack of evil pedophiles who think that (you) are literally an animal made to serve them This has nothing to do with the argument, but you wanna cry fallacy. Lol cuckchanners aren't sending their best. Them being pedophiles has nothing to do with Julian's decisions. >The Eastern Empire is still the Roman empire You wish, the Byzantines were about as Roman as the Ottomans. They only practiced and followed Roman law, but with Judaic assets attached to them.
>>15797 >This is an evolutionist meme It's not, I was mirroring the same logic that you are using to pilpul your one race, the human race category error, and there is no reason whatsoever to stop with niggers, when the similarities extend into the other ape species. Are you racist towards bonobos or something? Just because they are >I bet you think think that we are like 99.7% percent identical with chimps too You share most of your DNA with a banana, the point is that small differences enabling the expression of the highest common factor lead to most biological differences. The more differentiated a species, the more 0.001% of genetic difference matters. In that sense, a White man is MUCH further from a nigger than a nigger is from a chimp or a gorilla. >But then one goes and looks at the morphological level Even a quick glance at a White man and a nigger is enough to determine that they are not the same species, which was also confirmed by pretty much every morphological theory before it was banned. Also, people never considered niggers and many other non-White races human for most of the history, before kikes starting enforcing egalitarianism. Differences between Whites and niggers go much further than mere looks as well, so your strawman doesn't really make any difference overall. Gorilla is still closer to a nigger than nigger is to a White man. Nigger is the ubermonkey though, they would feel much better about themselves if they stopped trying to pretend to be human and just accepted their master race status among their own (monkey) kind. And yes, they also have entirely different generative/spiritual natures. Cope more >The rest of this is just jibber jabber. <I'm too stupid to understand abstract concepts You are free to worship whatever generic mechanism has spawned "you", but don't try to put us in the same basket. I don't entirely agree with Teleology but it's still a superior concept to creationism. As far as creationist worldview is concerned, gnostics were right about pretty much everything. But your god is not the actual creator of all that exists, he is just the cosmic kike.
>>15988 >there is no reason whatsoever to stop with niggers, when the similarities extend into the other ape species. Are you racist towards bonobos or something? Show me bonobos and gorillas interbreeding with humans and having offspring. Show me the bonobos and gorillas learning to speak a human language and being able to at least minimally function in human society. Blacks are absolutely the same species as humans because they are able to interbreed with other races, they are able to learn and speak any human language, they can function in human societies to a minimal degree and they have similar morphology to every other type of human. It is just obvious to even try to deny. You are just an evolutionist shill
>>15859 >he knows bible and was able to become pope because he fitted the requirements to become a priest in the first place. He practiced under V2. The Vatican is no longer catholic, and Francis blesses pagan idols, so he (and everyone following the post-Vatican 2 church) is pagan.
>>16182 It's amazing to read the 1864 Syllabus of Errors which condemns liberalism, communism, socialism, rationalism, naturalism, Protestantism, freedom of religion, securalism and everything else under the sun, only to see a complete inversion of this a century later. It's no wonder the Catholic Church is declining so hard in the West, along with all of the scandals of various kinds. I'm not even sure a more traditionalist pope would salvage it at this point.
>>16187 >securalism secularism
(136.17 KB 934x955 1634108815872.jpg)
>>15988 >a White man is MUCH further from a nigger than a nigger is from a chimp or a gorilla. Just like a jew is much further from a goy than a goy is from a beast of the field? In my experience a lot of blacks are annoying and entitled but I can't help but notice the resemblance between certain strains of wignat ideology and Judaism. I'm a cultural supremacist; I have yet to be convinced that IQ is the end-all be-all, especially since jews always score the highest on that shit. Judging by Jared Taylor's affinity for Jewish power I've always assumed "race realism" was a distraction if not outright controlled opposition. You don't need to appeal to IQ to convince people that importing a bunch of shitskins will make society worse. No one wants to live in Africa except for me, but only so I could shoot negroes trying to kill White farmers kek >>16020 Exactly. Blacks may be stupid but they aren't subhuman. And mixed people are generally pretty chill in my experience I don't like asians either and they're supposedly higher IQ than Whites. Their culture just turns them into soulless burden as the meme goes >>16182 Wtf based I love Catholicism now
>>16193 bugmen, not burden, but either works tbh
(355.58 KB 1125x1456 jesus 2.jpg)
>>16193 Regardless of one's view of Christianity, I have always seen those CGI images that the Jews always pump out of Jesus being some ugly mulatto to be pure anti-White propaganda against Christians but it's funny to see even Arabs(?) saying that this shit is disgusting garbage.
>>16020 And here comes the final strawman >b-but they are able to breed with other races and create disgusting mutants that will lose all recessive traits of the higher races, but at least this creature can survive and function in an entirely Judaized society that was fine-tuned to enable them, therefore all races are the same category. You keep denying evolution while using the exact same biological framework as mainstream evolutionists do. You not only equate 'humans' with animals and apply the same criteria for grouping, but also deny that quality is an exponential function where tiers are not distributed in a linear fashion. Speaking of physiognomy, dogs that look very differently can have fertile offspring, so you are sort of contradicting yourself by using both arguments. >they are able to learn and speak any human language They are not, that's why every European language turns into ebonics for them. >they can function in human societies to a minimal degree So can many animals. And there is no such thing as human society, the Judeo-Masonic abominations that we live in today are just a specific type. >>16193 >Just like a jew is much further from a goy than a goy is from a beast of the field? They are different, but not in a way that they think. Their essence is more like that of insects or viruses than beasts, so they are partially correct. To deny these essential differences and think how we are all the same group is foolish and only serves their agenda. >the resemblance between certain strains of wignat ideology and Judaism On the surface maybe, but the basis for the seemingly similar elements is entirely different. >I've always assumed "race realism" was a distraction if not outright controlled opposition Probably, but it doesn't need to be so supremacist, counter-productive and Jew-enabling. >I have yet to be convinced that IQ is the end-all be-all, especially since jews always score the highest on that shit IQ is just the processing power, a cockroach with a high IQ will still be a cockroach, just much better in what it does. Higher IQ doesn't change one's nature, only enables it to express more of what it already is. There are different types of intelligence anyway. >No one wants to live in Africa No one wants to live around niggers, not even niggers themselves. Africa is not that bad otherwise. You don't seem to get it, we don't need to hate non-Whites or even look down upon them, we can cooperate with them, but we will never be the same. Most racial conflicts are rooted in the lie that we are all 'human', when such category is not applicable to how various races express themselves. I can tolerate a lot of non-Whites but I can't tolerate identifying with them in any way. >MEMRI You realize it's literally run by Mossad, right?
>>16204 >You not only equate 'humans' with animals Humans are animals. > Speaking of physiognomy, dogs that look very differently can have fertile offspring Wow, it's almost like they're the same species! >They are not, that's why every European language turns into ebonics for them. Refuted by the fact that there are niggers who are very well capable of switching between standard English and their niggerspeak. It's called code-switching. >So can many animals. Where are the dogs that drive cars and work wagecuck jobs? I'm waiting.
(111.05 KB 960x1200 anus finger.jpg)
>>16204 >You don't seem to get it, we don't need to hate non-Whites or even look down upon them, we can cooperate with them, but we will never be the same. no I agree with you >MEMRI = mossad sure, it's still fucking hilarious though lol
>>16196 Go away thuletide.
>>16232 If there are people like the Druze and Levantines that look nothing like the Jewish CGI images of Jesus today, it's not hard to conclude that Jesus must have looked more like them than the images made today, this is a reasonable conclusion to make as well due to the fact that this board has discovered that most of the ancient world was White, from China, to Mongolia, to India, and to even figures in the Arabian peninsula some 1,400 years ago such as Muhammad (a White-skinned red-head). The Bible as far back as Genesis reports that there were people in the line of Abraham who had the genes for red hair, namely Esau. Interestingly as well, in sources such as Josephus we can read thing such as the following: >And when he had given them leave, they also hid the circumcision of their genitals; that even when they were naked they might appear to be Greeks. Accordingly they left off all the customs that belonged to their own country, and imitated the practices of the other nations. This implies that the only way that they would be able to discerned as Jews by the Greeks would be if they were shown to be circumcised when naked (e.g. such as in the Greek gymnasium) https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-12.html This is further supported by mosaics that have been found in Huqoq, depicting what has been interpreted as Alexander the Great meeting with Jewish priests. Alexander is the red-head, while the priests are the Jews. Jesus wasn't some disgusting mutt, and there is loads of evidence to show this, regardless of how much one may dislike the religion.
>>16235 No one gives a fuck what Jesus looks likw you retard. He's isn't real and him being Levantine is even more of a reason to not like him. Fuck Jesus, let the kikes mock him, because Christianity is what lead to Jews taking over the West. Ever since you started taking StJ's cock in your mouth, you've become more retarded.
>>16240 Also mossaics and claims of muh red heads are Abrahmaic nonsense. Red head doesn't mean they're White and there still exists no evidence that Muhammad was a White guy or was even real for that matter. This is just more we wuzz Israelite nonsense.
>>16241 The evidence is literally everywhere, dude, and everyone knows it. Muhammad has living ancestors who look like redheaded Europeans. Pic related is from Syria and is the 34th-generation grandson of Muhammad. There are dozens of ahadith describing Muhammad as explicitly “White” as well. If you’re prepared to deny both textual and archeological evidence there is no helping you. Just as redhead genes have left Greece, they left Mesopotamia and the Levant as well.
>>16241 >This is just more we wuzz Israelite nonsense. We wuz everybody, actually. This used to be a predominantly White planet, especially before the Kali Yuga began. China was almost entirely White, and all of the cultural inventions of ancient China (paper, etc) were made by Whites. Confucius and Lao Zi were White too. The Chinese government actively covers this information up today, especially in the area of the Tarim Basin. The ancient Vedic civilization was White too, as we all know. Ancient Greece was White, predominantly inhabited by redheads and blonds of a Nordic phenotype. Same with Iran, same with modern Pakistan, same with modern Afghanistan, and beyond. There are reports of ‘White gods’ founding every major civilization in the Americas well. Islam was founded by a White man as well, as the evidence from the hadith and living biological descendents of Muhammad clearly supports. The ancient Israelites were certainly White as well, given the evidence on hand.
>>16246 >We wuz everybody, actually. Then where the hell do shitskins come from?
>>16284 They gradually have appeared as a result of the degenerative processes of the Kali Yuga. They likely always existed to some extent, but the elite in these societies I described were almost invariably White.
>>16245 >The evidence is there <presents nothing as evidence only things that are claimed and interpretated into your perpsective <literally no living evidece that a White guy is Muhammad's descendant <trying hard to shill muh original Isrealite nonsense Kill yourself and be a kike somewhere else. >>16246 >WE WUZ VERBODY!! No we weren't. You're LARPing and going into nigger-tier we wuzzing. We don't know what China was like nor do we know anything about ancient history and what happened.
(84.90 KB 679x320 EJbFaXHU0AAvj6C.jpg)
(416.34 KB 998x1024 2199836329_a4b700c68d_b.jpg)
(116.46 KB 1200x675 EmgssFwU4AA_1r0.jpg)
(32.08 KB 480x479 d76.jpg)
>>16326 WE WERE KANGS Some of the oldest chinese mummies were literally White.
>>16339 6f4cea is a christfag shitting in basicaly ALL threads about aryan religion, archeology and history, the way he type is very characteristic by the excessive use of pink quotes and blind hate for anything aryan.
(194.12 KB 500x673 love being white.jpg)
>>16326 Anon, the evidence has literally been compiled in the other thread >>2541, there's no excuse for this level of ignorance. Every major civilization got off the ground because of Whites. It's just a fact. We wuz because we literally were
(135.83 KB 665x874 1607827750353.jpg)
>>16355 Checked 5 Hyperborea >there's no excuse for this level of ignorance. There is if he's a bad faith actor shilling judaic philosophy for damage control.
Even if Jesus was secretly an Aryan Godhead Deva, wouldn't believing in a religion that teaches tolerance amongst racially foreign peoples be kinda cucked?
>>16381 I don't see how Jesus is any different than from any of the figures in Dharmic teachings told here, except that Jesus has more of a messianic dimension to him. The perfect example of this is the Dhammapada, for example we have very Christian teachings like: <Hatred is never appeased by hatred in this world. By non-hatred alone is hatred appeased. This is a law eternal. Hatred is never appeased by hatred in this world. By non-hatred alone is hatred appeased. This is a law eternal" This is little different from turning the other cheek and loving your enemies from a Christian standpoint. <Let none find fault with others; let none see the omissions and commissions of others. But let one see one’s own acts, done and undone. This is actually worse than Christianity here, because while Jesus taught not to judge others lest one becomes a hypocrite, saying that they should first fix their own faults before focusing on the faults of others. I could undoubtedly find more points of comparisons in the Dhammapada, but I know people will point out that this is a Buddhist text. I do not think it matters that much though, because the entirety of Buddhism's basic system is drawn directly from Vedic teachings, ethics, etc.

Delete
Report