>And no one ever said that this was a perfect law-code. It wasn't awful either.
No it was total garbage and it failed. You're still not getting it. If you are against Judaism you do not allow them to establish communities and have influence within your politics and economy. Christianity's view on jews are literally blue-pilled and is no different than how Marx claimed to hate his own people, but then has solutions and teaches his followers a kikery mindset. This sets an example that christians are too retarded to exterminate the people they claim to have a hatred for even after all they've done. Only destroying synagogues only for them to be revived by other christian rulers, exiles only for the jews to come back, and forced conversions as if that will stop them from being crypto-christians.
>Yet they gave Jews equal citizenship anyway, which they never should have been given.
They also gave it to loyal christians and other semitics, so your point is meaningless here. If anything by bringing up Caracalla's edict it only serves to prove my point that you don't give Abrahamics citizenship, you kill them and burn the bodies. The Romans learned the hard way, although their elites were corrupt anything so it should be expected.
>Given out any sort of equal citizenship under the law to everyone is pozzed.
I agree, but apparently you don't see that christcucks have been doing this type of shit for years, especially right after Constantine took over Rome and the only requirement was to be a loyal convert. I'm glad we can agree that something you guys have been doing for hundred of years and are still advocating today admit that you're a bunch of faggots and retards.
>I never hear his name mentioned except from people online crying about him.
Thou shalt not lie? He's literally beloved by cathtrads, he's one of the most commonly talked about figures within christian circles, especially when ever there is a debate between christians and muslims.
>Constantine, newly converted to Christianity, was unsympathetic to Jews and during his reign passed several anti-Semitic laws. Jews were severely punished when they tried to rebuild their temple in Jerusalem.
<Christian bishops and some other priests were granted exemptions
from undertaking magistracies and other expensive services for their local
community. The same privilege was later extended to Jewish rabbis and
synagogue leaders. -How Rome Fell: Death of a Superpower Goldsworthy, Adrian p 198
<A few of Constantine’s pronouncements are overtly
hostile to the Jews as the killers of Jesus, but his actions were not markedly
more anti-Semitic than those of many earlier pagan emperors. The Jews
were again forbidden to seek converts or to attack those of their own
number who converted to Christianity. -ibid
I looked at your first quote and there's nothing that leads back to definitive proof, but I went further in my research to see if that quote was legitimate and it seems that you have taken a random site as your source of information without even fact-checking it. Especially if you actually read back at Grant's account of Constantine, he's called out for being biased as pic describes. The only harsh thing Constantine did was forbade jews barring them from owning christian slaves, converting christians, and forced circumcisions. Also Your archive also doesn't give any sources at all, but it's funny that you used (((jewishencyclopedia)))
as your argument that he was totally anti-semitic. There's a lack of evidence that the Edict Of Milian lead to jews losing rights, which are only claimed from jews themselves. They love to make themselves out to be the victims of everything after all and Constantine affects and changes from Rome has only ended up being good for the jew than it was under Hellenic Rome.
It's not a genetic fallacy when I can prove that anything that comes from jews are inherently bad and you seem to kind of agree with me, although you don't agree and are in-denial when we tell you that jews have always been eternally evil since their birth. I'm the one that should be calling you out for it, because your previous post is just "muh bible!" and "well it felt real to me!'
>Prove they weren't,
<Y-you have to prove something I c-claimed!
You're asking me to prove something that I have asked you to prove as per your claim that Julian was in the wrong.
>They're a pack of evil pedophiles who think that (you) are literally an animal made to serve them
This has nothing to do with the argument, but you wanna cry fallacy. Lol cuckchanners aren't sending their best. Them being pedophiles has nothing to do with Julian's decisions.
>The Eastern Empire is still the Roman empire
You wish, the Byzantines were about as Roman as the Ottomans. They only practiced and followed Roman law, but with Judaic assets attached to them.