/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion


[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply Return
Säge
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.


04/08/21 New logo contest is now open for the upcoming site update! Submit your entry here.
08/28/20 Come and join our Matrix/IRC servers, the info can be found here.
02/09/20 /ausneets/ has been added!
11/23/19 Donations can now be made via PayPal, thank you for all of your support!
11/21/19 We have successfully migrated to LynxChan 2.3.0, to see all of the changes to 16chan, click here.


[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

Fascist News General /fng/ Blackshirt 03/21/2021 (Sun) 23:22:09 ID:b05fd1 No. 271
Revival from cafe. This thread is for discussion of recent happenings that may be of interest to users of this board. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, news involving fascist parties around the world, info related to government / corporate responses to White nationalist / fascist activities, and events that are likely of interest to users here, such as declining race-relations, anti-White policies and jewish-related scheming. This thread existed on 8chan, but it's gonna be here on a trial basis. If it attracts too many outsiders, it will be deleted. If it results in garbage-tier discussion not healthy to /fascist/, it will be deleted. This is still /fascist/, not a free-for-all area. PLEASE ATTEMPT TO ARCHIVE CONTENT, VIDEOS AND USE ALTERNATIVE SITES WHERE POSSIBLE, THANK YOU
>>3213 >Because it's important to distinguish between the cause of the problem, Except they're both they cause of them problems with the world and the West. This doesn't mean we see that everyone with light-skin is an ally versus shit-skins or anything, it's true Whites vs non-Whites. >jews are the ones who push forward the agenda and the golems passively and eagerly follow what is laid down from above by their jewish masters. And non-Whites unwillingly and willingly help them. It doesn't matter if the jew runs the narratives, their pawns are still a threat. Do you think that non-Whites are going to be different even after the kikes are gone? >Nothing inherently anti-Nature about non-Whites. t.non-White Look at Africa and Asia's environmental destruction and try saying this again. Your apologies for non-Whites makes perfect sense and it's because you aren't White yourself. >This was not true until they got hold of anti-Nature modern tech. >The red-skins killing off innocent American Bisons >African tribes slaughtering animals fir religious purpose and randomly destroying local habitats >Asians bugmen deforesting cities for profit and a larger population. Yeah sure buddy.
(3.52 MB 5689x4448 bison skulls.jpg)
>>3218 >Look at Africa and Asia's environmental destruction and try saying this again We're not talking about modern Asia and Africa and this should be extremely obvious. Of course they will become reckless and destructive when given the tools to do so, and also no one was claiming that they left their environments pre-European contact perfectly pristine. This is evidently false, however the burden of proof is still on you in your contention that non-Whites are inherently more destructive in all times and all places towards their environments. Anything you will mention that non-Whites have done in this regard I am sure I could find many examples of Whites doing the exact same thing. Instead of screeching how I'm allegedly non-White I'd like to see some real arguments.
>>3220 >We're not talking about modern Asia and Africa and this should be extremely obvious. I'm not just taking modern Asia or Africa either, because they've been doing this for centuries. Also you neglect the fact that Asians have been agaisnt nature since the Han dynasty where they hold similar sentiment to the belief that nature exist to be exploited. >This is evidently false, however the burden of proof is still on you in your contention that non-Whites are inherently more destructive in all times and all places towards their environments. If it's evidently false then you should post an actual counter-point instead of defending muh precious niggers. Deforestation originated from non-Whites and as they flood your lands they accelerate this, look at the Neolithic period as example when the non-European farmers came into Europe and began destroying everything for food and shelter. >Anything you will mention that non-Whites have done in this regard I am sure I could find many examples of Whites doing the exact same thing. But you could really buddy? You most certainly can't say ancient Whites have done this, considering they always warned the elites about the destruction of our environments along with having a religion that particularly talks of how evil always comes with the hatred of nature. You could argue the Whites go by semitic traditions that is Christianity, but that only proves my point that anything non-White in origin is going to be agaisnt nature. >Instead of screeching how I'm allegedly non-White I'd like to see some real arguments. Where did I ever express that I was screeching? I gave my arguments, but you're just too much of a nigger to comprehend my obvious points on why apologism for non-Whites is retarded. You are indeed likey a non-White or maybe a foolish White man with a non-White friend/spouse, because after-all that's happen these past days, what fascists who isn't a shitskin would think that we should spare the jew's natural slaves and just not the jew? White people lose nothing from murdering their enemies, so if you are White this shouldn't be a problem for you either.
>ancap shilling >Defense of Trump in the COVID-19 thread >defending Non-Whites You /pol/niggers have got to go and fuck forever.
>>3226 *Off*
>>3220 > Anything you will mention that non-Whites have done in this regard I am sure I could find many examples of Whites doing the exact same thing. You could argue Christcucks doing this, but even if you do you will have to be reminded that even Christian Whites have had their fair-share of recognizing that man is part of nature and should seek to protect and preserve it. While most Protestants rejected this idea wholly, so they could practice the original Hebrew scriptures. If any White person abuses nature it is upmost usually because they are degenerates or been infected with Christcuckery/Abrahamic lies. The Anglos are an example of a people who used to harmonize with nature, until the transition into Catholicism and then at worst Evangelicalism, which worsen the minds of Whites who no longer care for harmony, but dominion.
>>3224 >Deforestation originated from non-Whites Bullshit. Europeans over the last six to eight thousand years have destroyed over half of their forests single-handedly, even prior to Christianity and other forms of Semitic influence, which only accelerated an ongoing trend. >look at the Neolithic period as example when the non-European farmers came into Europe and began destroying everything for food and shelter. Non-Whites weren't flooding Europe in the Neolithic. There's zero proof of this. In fact it was the Indo-Europeans - who were Whites - who were entering Europe during the late Neolithic with the spread of agriculture and pastoralism. Good examples of mass-deforestation of parts of Europe by the natives include Sicily, the Italian peninsula and Greece. >>3226 >noooo, don't question things that seem to be blatant lies! You must love non-Whites if you look for the truth!
>>3231 >Bullshit. Europeans over the last six to eight thousand years have destroyed over half of their forests single-handedly, Citation needed retard. >Non-Whites weren't flooding Europe in the Neolithic. There's zero proof of this. European farmers are non-Whites you low-IQ faggot. > In fact it was the Indo-Europeans - who were Whites - who were entering Europe during the late Neolithic with the spread of agriculture and pastoralism. You have no sense of history and making are shit up. Indo-Europeans entered Europe and depopulated the niggers who were building ancient cities and fortresses. The sole reason they did this was literally, because they were destroying our forests and environments. Your shillery doesn't work here it's time to go back. >. Good examples of mass-deforestation of parts of Europe by the natives include Sicily, the Italian peninsula and Greece. Which are also filled with non-Whites and where Neolithic negro DNA is the highest. >>noooo, don't question things that seem to be blatant lies! You must love non-Whites if you look for the truth! Go back to 4cuck kike.
>>3235 >Citation needed retard. https://news.mongabay.com/2018/01/more-than-half-of-europes-forests-lost-over-6000-years/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-18646-7 >European farmers are non-Whites you low-IQ faggot. Too dumb to even address this Varg-tier retardation. Whites lived in Europe prior to agriculture, and more Whites came into Europe with the Indo-European migrations. >Indo-Europeans entered Europe and depopulated the niggers who were building ancient cities and fortresses. "It was real in my mind". All pre-Indo-European peoples in Europe are to no one's surprise, White. Basques, Finns, etc. The pre-migration peoples never even completely disappeared, but were assimilated to Indo-European society and language, and their cultures absorbed.
>>3235 >Indo-Europeans entered Europe and depopulated the niggers who were building ancient cities and fortresses. We wuz architects and warlords n' Sheeeit
>>3237 First article >Increased demand for agricultural land and wood fuel were found to be the leading causes for deforestation. >“Other countries in Europe have yet to reach that point, and some parts of Scandinavia – where there is not such a reliance on agriculture – are still predominantly forest.” Second Article >8000 years ago, prior to Neolithic agriculture, Europe was mostly a wooded continent. Fucking Idiot, proving my point. Also Six thousand years ago is literally around the time NEOLITHIC FARMING WAS INTRODUCED TO EUROPEANS! Thanks for proving my point LOL. >Too dumb to even address this Varg-tier retardation. Except you litearlly just proved my point dumbnuts. Varg is an idiot, but he isn't wrong for stating an obvious fact that Fascists and right-wingers agree on and that is the Neolithic period was a literal disaster for humanity. >Whites lived in Europe prior to agriculture, Whites lived in Europe before agriculture you dumbass. You seem to have forgotten that Cro-Magnons and Easter-hunter gathers aka two proto-Aryans existed way before farming ever entered Europe and they did not have farming, but foraging and proto-gardening. >"It was real in my mind" No it was quite literally real and done by an archeologist I'll give you the link once I find it. Although you're still retarded and don't know what you're talking about as expected from a cuckchanner shitskin. >>3238 That's not what I implied, but thanks for proving that you are indeed mentally retarded.
>>3237 Both of your articles explains that Europe's forests were lost due to the agricultural needs and productivity that came from Anatolian farmers where they settled on fertile lands. Six-thousand years is at least 3500-3000 BC which is also the estimation around the time the Neolithic period was beginning to end or had ended and the start of the Bronze Age and increase of extraction and trades of metals discovered by farmers and hunter-gathers, across the world. If we take your jewish, unarchived, and normalfag sources as a fact, then this would mean that the farmers who got their technology and method to produce and store food from Asia, not only caused the deforestation of Europe, but proves that non-White imports literally kills nature itself. The fact you're trying to argue that the Ancient Aryans destroyed Europe is not only retarded, but something that only kikes would do. You clearly aren't from around here and need to leave.
>>3238 Also your articles contradict each other. One says that prior to Neolithic agriculture Europe has been deforested and the other argues that it was at least before. The thing about scientists is that they don't always know how to date and explain exactly what happened and how it did happen. They just claim that forests were loss due to "agriculture" and "human activity", while just using pollen to estimate a date. It's possible that farming came much earlier to Europe before what they date as the Neolithic period.
>>3243 > and the other argues that it was at least before. I meant after 11,000 years.
>>3240 >>Whites lived in Europe prior to agriculture, <Whites lived in Europe before agriculture you dumbass That's literally what he said, ESL-kun
>>3239 This nigger is more upset at a pig doing his job than Africa getting chinked.com. He's a control opposition. >>3237 > Whites lived in Europe prior to agriculture, and more Whites came into Europe with the Indo-European migrations. Yeah they did live in Europe prior to agriculture and yet your sources do not explain anything other than that deforestation was caused by some form of agricultural and that it occurred before the Agricultural Revolution. It's still possible that Neolithic farming came into way before the Indo-Euro migration meaning it was not the Aryans who deforested Europe. The Indo-European migration happened after Neolithic farmers came and replaced the males and likely taking the females as their spouses. The both of you should trying studying what you argue. >>3241 The Neolithic revolution does not really have a proper date. Some have argued it came much earlier than 11,000 years ago and it's development has already been within the Levant and parts of Europe before any invasion from Anatolians, due to trade and earlier migration, although those have mostly been possible theories. For the case within pre-historic Europe it is not really known when exactly did Europeans transition to farming or used it at all. All we known so far is that the revolution from occurred somewhere from 8000 BCE and ended around 1000 BCE, which likely came from a bunch of agriculturalists who lived in Anatolia and Greece for a short-while and decided to invaded all the way from Balkans to Northern Germany. You can't trust scientists when it comes to dating and explaining what happened, because it does not make sense that they report that deforestation happened in Northern Europe, but nothing on the South and East. Repost because I forgot to give the proper anon his (You).
>>3245 I know, and it wasn't I meant. I meant to say that agriculture existed prior to Europe and there has been no signs that native Europeans began any environmental destruction until farming occurred, despite what his article says. Honestly I fucked up the entire post and what I really wanted to say, because I'm trying to find a very good PDF/book I read a couple years back that I saw on Twatter.
(99.23 KB 1330x724 Neolithic_Barcin_BAR100.png)
Ignoring the other autism in the NEWS THREAD >>3237 He asked for the citations that there was proof that Europeans destroyed their own forests. How do we know if there just wasn't a different group? >Too dumb to even address this Varg-tier retardation. I'm convinced this is either Thule or some other retard. The DNA tests that you love to spout to act as an intellectual have shown that they have at least 5-10% WHG DNA and 10% "Steppe" DNA. They are mostly Eastern-shifted. >more Whites came into Europe with the Indo-European migrations. He's talking about Early European Farmers or EEF.
HD footage of the shooting of Ma'Khia Bryant. 12 minutes long too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvSgtDiumlI
(2.08 MB 1080x1351 ClipboardImage.png)
(159.39 KB 960x640 4JQMUYAV4VJWRFZYT6LLP26ADY.jpg)
OH VEY ISRAELI IDF INTELLIGENCE REPORT SAYS THE NUCLEAR FACILITY WAS ALMOST TAKEN OUT BY HEZBOLLAH WHO FIRED A SUPERSONIC IRANIAN MISSILE FROM SYRIAN TERRITORY THAT COMPLETELY BYPASSED IRON DOME, DAVIDS SLING, THAAD, PATRIOT, AND ARROW DEFENSE SYSTEMS PENETRATING 150 MILES INTO THE HEART OF THE PROMISE LAND >A Syrian missile exploded in southern Israel on Thursday, the Israeli military said, in an incident that triggered warning sirens near the secretive Dimona nuclear reactor and an Israeli strike in Syria. >An Israeli military spokesman identified the projectile as an SA-5 surface-to-air missile fired by Syrian forces against Israeli aircraft. He said it overflew its target to reach the Dimona area, 200 km (125 miles) south of the Syrian border. >The missile did not hit the reactor, exploding some 30 km (19 miles) away, the spokesman added. >The sirens that sounded overnight in the Dimona area followed weeks of heightened tension between Israel and Iran, a close ally of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, amid renewed global negotiations over Tehran's nuclear programme. >For weeks, Israeli media have said air defences around the Dimona reactor and the Red Sea port of Eilat were being strengthened in anticipation of a possible long-range missile or drone attack by Iranian-backed forces. >In public remarks on Thursday's incident, Israeli Defence Minister Benny Gantz said the anti-aircraft missile was fired from Syria during an Israeli strike there against "assets that could be used for a potential attack against Israel". https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/sirens-warns-possible-rocket-attack-near-israels-dimona-reactor-2021-04-21/ https://archive.fo/twEf9
(194.11 KB 1024x600 Hezbollah hail.jpg)
>>3336 >>The missile did not hit the reactor, exploding some 30 km (19 miles) away, the spokesman added. Aww, I sure hope they try again!

Delete
Report


no cookies?