>Not when you have 1.4 billion people
1.4 billion is too large and too difficult to administrate over, so their race isn't protected nor secured, because having a too large of a number doesn't mean you're safe from becoming a minority within your own nation especially when it's rapidly decreasing each year. Even if you have that many people you still skew over the fact that Han Chinese are prefering to marry outside of their race. In about 100 years mutts will become a sigificant representation of China's demographics if nothing is solved to save the Hans and then there will be a problem.
>Do they have bases all over Europe where they send their resident niggers to mingle with the locals?
<W-what about America!
<T-they may be ZOG, but they aren't Murica!!
Using America as a scapegoat won't make China look better. All the things that are happening to America are going to happen to them soon enough. They already has transexuals, femboys and queer movements that are able to freely roam around with protection by the CCP laws and the Chinese law-makers are 50/50 on whether they should accepy gay marriage. China is no different to what America was during the 70-80s. This is all beside the point that these Jewish yellow pigs are apart of ZOG and are a threat to Europeans.
>Would the Jews tolerate if Chinks did the same?
The Chinks aren't doing the same and have no conflict with the Jews, so this question is irrevelant.
>I'm only trying to discuss China from a neutral perspective
You tried to downplay the extent of China's relationship Israel as mere "business ties" which wasn't the argument anyone was upholding. You are obviously biased, refuse to stop defending a Judaic non-White country, and your "but what about America" line contradicts that you don't, because a neutral perspective means to acknowledge the circumstances of both countries, not just one.
>What I meant is that the average Chink has a reason to oppose the Jew as much as a White man does.
You brought nothing of the case that proves they will or have ever done such a thing, and like anon said, you don't sell your children for international Jewry/capitalism, have your citizens read your "enemies'" book, and worship their god(s) if you ever want the chance to oppose them as a collective force. A foe of the Jews would directly attack and condemn and their practices without hesistantation. This is what Hitler and Mussolini had done, we don't see Xi doing the same at all.
>Chinks are far from being praiseworthy
Correct that's what he said, problem?
>My point exactly.
No it wasn't.
>Which means that there is a small chance of them outjewing the Jew
Nah, they will just work with the Jews until they've become slaves. The Jews will not allow them to revolt just like they have done with the USA. History will repeat.
>not necessarily Nat-Soc, or Aryan type of nationalism
It's a Judaic form of socialist or state nationalism. And "necessarily" is a huge stretch from the truth, because they aren't any where close to fascism.
>Which is most likely not genuine, compared to Americans
More whataboutism and muh murica.They're on on the same level as displayed here with links and screenshots.
>I wasn't praising China by any means, just wondering if there is any potential within it for opposing the Jew (in practice).
You were making apologism for the CCP, for supposedly being "better" and having soft feelings for them, because they're an opposition to Amerika (despite both being about the same as each other).
Let's drop this conversation, because both of you autistic aren't getting that if you're going to hate Weimar 2 and call someone a cuckservative for defending it, then you shouldn't like chinkland either and complain that you're called a Chinese shill.