>So is he right or wrong?
<Accelerationism, the most renowned Collapsitarian ideology, can be succinctly summarized as “losing is winning” or “cope: the ideology.” It stems from anti-capitalist theories that aim to end capitalism by expanding capitalism and accelerating towards technological singularity, the point at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible.
This is debatable. I think only the most retarded 'accelerationists' would think that expanding jewish power to its limits is good and something that would accelerate the collapse of society. This would only accelerate our extinction. I consider myself an accelerationist to some degree, and when I say that, I mean I support this modern society being destroyed and the race-war being brought about as soon as possible. This isn't accomplished by letting the jews do whatever they want, but rather working to cripple the jewish system, its infrastructure, its efficiency and social cohesion. This is why the archetypal accelerationist is someone like Tarrant. He didn't advocate for letting the jews run roughshod over White nations, he advocated for picking up a gun and killing invaders, also in order to bring about more effects he thought would bring about a race war and White awakening sooner.
<Intentionally worsening social material conditions to accelerate the collapse of “The System” (note: the system is rarely defined) will allow revolutionaries to violently take power — or force the “lemmings” (lit: normal people, working-class, proletariat, peasants, etc.) to spontaneously rise up and depose the current ruling elite, at which point, revolutionaries can take their place and crown themselves dictators for life (or something).
I think at this point most accelerationists realize that lemmings are complete and other golems. Worsening the material conditions could
possibly change something if they were bad enough, I don't disagree with this, but there is no guarantees that White Nationalists would be able to reap the benefits of this.
<that societal collapse (or managed decline, at least) is precisely what Globalist elites are gunning for. They’ve been steering Western Civilization towards total implosion from the moment they secured political hegemony at the end of the Second World War. Every Globalist policy, from debt slavery to mass migration, is designed to destabilize society while reducing all non-elite living standards to slum-tier slavery.
Globalist elites aren't aiming for societal collapse. They're aiming for the complete triumph of rationalization, technologization and control over the populace. It's anarcho-tyranny more than anything. What they are doing now is solely to kill off Whites and other resistant groups and to strengthen their grip on the world. Societal collapse would not be beneficial to the jews. In fact the jews identify themselves with a progressively evolving civilization. Just look at the ideas of Tikkun Olam and Reconstructionist Judaism. Ideas like the Great Reset are the exact opposite of collapse. I would recommend that Thuletide read 'The Technological Society' by Jacques Ellul, for one.
What he says about 'starving the beast', 'survivalist enclaves and nomadism' is true.
This comment I have attached is also very true that is directed at him. He doesn't provide any solutions. Though many of the accelerationist, anti-system ideas are flawed, they are at least proposed solutions, and I think they are not horrible solutions