Ur-Fascism Contra Universal Nationalism >UNIVERSAL NATIONALISM is the view that 1) every people wants its own nation, 2) every people is entitled to its own nation, and 3) every people should rule itself and not be ruled by others. This view is central to the beliefs of several Alt-Right and New Right thinkers. https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/11/ur-fascism-contra-universal-nationalism/ A short little article critical of universal nationalism as pushed by types like homosexual Greg Johnson

>>1162 Your point being? How is the article wrong? I get that the author is a homo but isn't nationalism what we strive for?

>>1190 Did you even click on the link? The article I posted is not by Greg Johnson, it's critical of a position espoused by Greg Johnson and other Alt-Kike figures.

>>1777 It looks like these guys were doing some actually good work. It's quite unfortunate that their leader was a homo who literally died from AIDS though.

https://twitter.com/albulqani/status/1379076148143943682 https://t.co/qS9CZE9WJd?amp=1 >Due to very low birth rates of the natives and the very high birth rates of Roma people, by 2050 Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia and Serbia could be Roma-majority nations.

>>1801 Interesting. This definitely appears to be a hidden threat. Many people are very focused on Muslims (rightfully), and look at maps where by 2050 or so these countries are still less than 1-2% Muslims, but it appears the truth here is that Gypsies will outnumber them right under their noses.

https://twitter.com/Heliotrophy/status/1373158581965627393 Twitter thread with arguments for why to choose Paganism instead of Abrahamism.

>>1190 I thought this was an ethnoglobe/White supremacist board? I for one do not care for rights of others and want Whites to collectively rule over everyone else.

>>2644 Good thread, thanks. Seems like an Abrahamist was riled up by it too, kek. It's good to see him warn in the beginning about the dangers of overly individualistic practice / eclecticism as well. That's a major issue I've been concerned with myself, and is a major downside of paganism as it exists right now. Though one can of course travel alone to an extent, community has always been an important part of religion / spirituality.

>>2647 /fascist/ is not one person, retard. We've always been a FASCIST board and there are diverse opinions on some issues, and consensus on other issues

>>2649 >/fascist/ is not one person, retard. Yeah no shit, but I didn't think there would be some on here who are retarded enough to think that the "place for every race" slogan isn't cuckoldry and retarded at the same time. /fascist/ doesn't need to be so diverse it has retards like (You) who come on this board to stir shit up and sperg out like a tranny.

>>2654 >I didn't think there would be some on here who are retarded enough to think that the "place for every race" slogan isn't cuckoldry and retarded at the same time I wouldn't even deny this statement in the slightest. That said, /fascist/ isn't anything like an 'ethnoglobe' board. Most people who can't shut up about it are themselves spergs

>>2655 >That said, /fascist/ isn't anything like an 'ethnoglobe' board. You don't get to determine that, especially considering the fact that most of the anons on here have been for ethnoglobe. I think what you meant to say here is that you personally, a liberal do not like the idea of ethnoglobe. >Most people who can't shut up about it are themselves spergs The people who orbit around /fascist/ and cry about ethnoglobe on a White supremacist board are actually spergs and you are indeed one of them.

So is he right or wrong? https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/04/23/on-accelerationism-why-praying-for-the-collapse-is-an-escapist-fantasy/

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/04/the-germans-werent-brutal-enough-2/ Also National Vanguard nails it on the head. Hitler and the leaders of the NSDAP should of killed anyone all threats to the the Third Reich. The Reich was entirely lost due to traitors and cowards.

>>3813 >So is he right or wrong? Wrong. <Accelerationism, the most renowned Collapsitarian ideology, can be succinctly summarized as “losing is winning” or “cope: the ideology.” It stems from anti-capitalist theories that aim to end capitalism by expanding capitalism and accelerating towards technological singularity, the point at which technological growth becomes uncontrollable and irreversible. This is debatable. I think only the most retarded 'accelerationists' would think that expanding jewish power to its limits is good and something that would accelerate the collapse of society. This would only accelerate our extinction. I consider myself an accelerationist to some degree, and when I say that, I mean I support this modern society being destroyed and the race-war being brought about as soon as possible. This isn't accomplished by letting the jews do whatever they want, but rather working to cripple the jewish system, its infrastructure, its efficiency and social cohesion. This is why the archetypal accelerationist is someone like Tarrant. He didn't advocate for letting the jews run roughshod over White nations, he advocated for picking up a gun and killing invaders, also in order to bring about more effects he thought would bring about a race war and White awakening sooner. <Intentionally worsening social material conditions to accelerate the collapse of “The System” (note: the system is rarely defined) will allow revolutionaries to violently take power — or force the “lemmings” (lit: normal people, working-class, proletariat, peasants, etc.) to spontaneously rise up and depose the current ruling elite, at which point, revolutionaries can take their place and crown themselves dictators for life (or something). I think at this point most accelerationists realize that lemmings are complete and other golems. Worsening the material conditions could possibly change something if they were bad enough, I don't disagree with this, but there is no guarantees that White Nationalists would be able to reap the benefits of this. <that societal collapse (or managed decline, at least) is precisely what Globalist elites are gunning for. They’ve been steering Western Civilization towards total implosion from the moment they secured political hegemony at the end of the Second World War. Every Globalist policy, from debt slavery to mass migration, is designed to destabilize society while reducing all non-elite living standards to slum-tier slavery. Globalist elites aren't aiming for societal collapse. They're aiming for the complete triumph of rationalization, technologization and control over the populace. It's anarcho-tyranny more than anything. What they are doing now is solely to kill off Whites and other resistant groups and to strengthen their grip on the world. Societal collapse would not be beneficial to the jews. In fact the jews identify themselves with a progressively evolving civilization. Just look at the ideas of Tikkun Olam and Reconstructionist Judaism. Ideas like the Great Reset are the exact opposite of collapse. I would recommend that Thuletide read 'The Technological Society' by Jacques Ellul, for one. What he says about 'starving the beast', 'survivalist enclaves and nomadism' is true. This comment I have attached is also very true that is directed at him. He doesn't provide any solutions. Though many of the accelerationist, anti-system ideas are flawed, they are at least proposed solutions, and I think they are not horrible solutions

>>3816 This truly is the biggest flaw that the Third Reich had in retrospect. As has been said here several times, if your enemy does not have honor and mercy, you cannot fight them with honor and mercy. It will lead to your own defeat. Truly, the Allies (i.e. the jew) grasped this, as is illustrated by Pierce in his article in a few different ways. The Allies bombed countless German and Japanese cities into dust and ashes, burning tens of thousands alive, and even dropped nuclear weapons on two different cities. The Allies were completely brutal and ruthless once their war machine was going at full speed. And instead of morally condemning them as most more bluepilled people would do, I cannot bring myself to. Sure, hundreds of thousands of innocents were burned alive or maimed for life, but in truth the Germans needed to be doing more of this to the people of France, the USSR and England. There should have been no mercy shown at Dunkirk, London should have been bombed until it looked like the surface of the moon, and most likely Hitler should have used chemical and biological weapons in his war. They were certainly stockpiling them, as is well known. Though I don't want to make the Third Reich look too soft though. The Polish intelligentsia were almost completely liquidated by the Germans. Einsatzgruppen did good work mopping up Communists, jews and partisans in German-occupied territories. And other displays of ruthlessness include the Siege of Leningrad. Pierce is 100% right. And so was Savitri Devi when she said: >One can say, with more and more certainty as the “Dark Age” goes on, that the godlike men of action are defeated, at least for the time being, not for having been too ruthless (and thus for having roused against themselves and their ideas and their collaborators the indignation of the “decent people”), but for not having been ruthless enough — for not having killed off their fleeing enemies, to the last man, in the brief hour of triumph; for not having silenced both the squeamish millions of hypocrites and their masters, the clever producers of atrocity-tales, by more substantial violences, more complete exterminations. And this is what will have to happen. Even one who doesn't buy into Devi's mysticism can grasp this. This is the power of the idea of Kalki. Kalki is Hitler perfected. Kalki is the leader who will make the Holocaust real, the one who try globohomo for its crimes and condemn its servants to death, and invert the jewish inversion of values.

>>3830 >Einsatzgruppen did good work mopping up Communists, jews and partisans in German-occupied territories. Isn't it a lie that they mass killed jews, Partisans and commies? Didn't they just arrest, fought back and shoved anyone into a concentration camp who rebelled against NatSoc occupation? I would admittedly argue everything about the NatSoc was soft compared to what the Soviet Union had done to their opposers to revolutionize and take a step ahead to come on top.

>>3834 They didn't just kill everyone, but they did kill certain types of people. According to Commissar Order of 1941 for Barbarossa, any and all political representatives of the Soviet state captured during the fighting were to be summarily executed. I'm sure this led to the deaths of many jews in itself. Hundreds of thousands of Communists were taken prisoner after occupation of certain areas. We know they were not all killed, unfortunately. Knowing how stretched the supply lines were becoming and how difficult it was becoming to feed the Wehrmacht off Russia, it would have been better to dump a lot of these Soviet soldiers into a ditch really. When it came to those who resisted though, I think we can safely conclude that they were wiped out. Letting partisans fighting you behind your own lines would not be smart tactically either, and part of the reason for the existence of Einsatzgruppen was to mop these people up. Regarding jews, we know they were brought to camps from all over the place. I'm sure some were killed for various reasons, but it's clear that every jew found was not shot on sight like they should have been.

The Jesus Hoax: How St. Paul’s Cabal Fooled the World for Two Thousand Years This sounds like an interesting book that explores many of the things that people here talk about: >The Jesus Hoax attempts to convince the reader that there is no rational basis for Christianity and that the motivation for its main originator, St. Paul, was antagonism toward the Roman Empire. Within this framework, Paul was a jewish nationalist whose goal was to recruit non-jews to oppose the Roman imperium: “Since the biblical Jesus story is false, it was evidently constructed by Paul and his fellow jews in order to sway the gullible Gentile masses to their side and away from Rome” (43). Indeed, Skrbina claims that Paul may have been a Zealot, i.e., a member of a jewish sect dedicated to violent resistance against the Romans, concluding “it seems clear that he was an ardent jewish nationalist opposed to Roman rule, as was the case with most elite jews of the time” (37). >The first Romans to comment on Christianity were Tacitus and Pliny (~115), both of whom disliked Christianity. As Skrbina notes, “the Romans were generally tolerant of other religions, and thus we must conclude that there was something uniquely problematic about this group” (60). >Skrbina, discussing the Gospel of Mark, notes that Paul et al. had two enemies, the Romans and non-believing jews like the Pharisees who “wanted to kill Jesus” (95). Mark therefore blamed both, and Skrbina concludes that “Mark’s anger against his fellow jews … got the better of him; for centuries afterward, Christians would blame the jews for killing Christ, not realizing that the whole tale was a jewish construction in the first place” (95). >Skrbina’s reconstruction of the trajectory of Christianity is presented as tentative (“I’ll not claim certainty here” [81]). For example, he imagines a soliloquy by jewish patriot Paul asking, “What message could our ‘Jesus’ take to the masses,” answering “we need them to be pro-jewish, not make them jews–no, that would never work. We need something new, a ‘third way’ between Judaism and paganism. Maybe for a start, we could get them to worship our God Jehovah, and not that absurd Roman pantheon” (84; emphasis in text). And the whole point was to encourage revolt: “Throughout [Paul’s] letters we find numerous references to enslavement, revolution, insurrection, war, the importance of the disempowered masses, and so on. In the early Galatians we read of the need for Jesus to ‘deliver us from the present evil age’ ([Galatians] 1:4)” (90). https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/04/27/review-of-david-skirbinas-the-jesus-hoax-how-st-pauls-cabal-fooled-the-world-for-two-thousand-years/ >>4363 This looks pretty comprehensive. Thanks for sharing, I'm going to have to spend the time digging through this later.

>>4369 This is interesting and I've always questioned the validity of Jesus' existence due to the lack of mentions of him by Roman historians, so thanks for this information anon. Although do you have anything on Muhammad as well? Because I've heard that he lacks evidence for his existence and there being some inconsistency in his story of working as a missionary.

>>4373 >This is interesting and I've always questioned the validity of Jesus' existence due to the lack of mentions of him by Roman historians, so thanks for this information anon. No problem, anon. I'm not entirely convinced yet myself, but I don't think this information can be completely dismissed at all. We know that Tacitus referred to Jesus' death in his Annals, which are apparently written around 115 CE. This is nearly 85 years later, and there is no mention of a miraculous resurrection or any other Christcuck claims. And then Suetonius mentions in his text written around 120 CE events that occured in 49 CE about jews rioting in Rome over a "Chrestus" figure. All of these mentions are multiple decades later. An anon on the /fascist/ Matrix chat was recommending that I read Richard Carrier's book on Jesus' apparent non-existence. He said it's very dense and loaded with good info. I haven't read it yet and had some reservations due to the nature of the author, but having scrolled through a PDF of the work it does look pretty comprehensive. >Although do you have anything on Muhammad as well? Because I've heard that he lacks evidence for his existence and there being some inconsistency in his story of working as a missionary. I don't have too much on this. Maybe look into the book 'Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World'. The gist is: <Cook and Crone postulate that "Hagarism" started as a "jewish messianic movement" to "reestablish Judaism" in the jewish Holyland (Palestine) and known at first as muhajirun, not Muslims, their hijra (migration) was to Jerusalem not Medina. Its members were both jewish and Arab to begin with but "with the Arabs' increasing success" that group broke with the jews (culminating around the time of Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan). They first flirted with Christianity and adopted a respect for Jesus as prophet and Mary as Virgin, before asserting a new independent Abrahamic monotheist identity. This borrowed from the jewish breakaway sect of Samaritanism "the idea of a scripture limited to the Pentateuch, a prophet like Moses (Muhammad), a holy book revealed like the Torah (the Quran), a sacred city (Mecca) with a nearby mountain (Jabal an-Nour) and shrine (the Kaaba) of an appropriate patriarch (Abraham), plus a caliphate modeled on an Aaronid priesthood. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagarism Some other facts I've learned over the years though is that the name 'Muhammad' literally means 'praised, commendable or lauded'. This could easily be a title of someone, and not a personal name. The word 'Qur'ān' too is not even an Arabic word. It comes from a Syrian loanword 'qeryānā'. Given how there are parallels in the Qur'an between it and the Syriac Infancy Gospel is also suspicious and maybe more proof that it's just some mutant form of Christianity. There's also something addressed directly in the Qur'an about Muhammad being fed lines by a group of people. This is extremely interesting, as it is very similar to other allegedly fake 'accusations' given in the Gospels, such as how the body-snatching hypothesis for Jesus is directly mentioned in one of the Gospels. I'd have to find what I'm talking about in the Qur'an

Found what I was talking about: Q 25:4-5: < And those who disbelieve say, "This [Qur’ān] is not except a falsehood he invented, and another people assisted him in it." But they have committed an injustice and a lie. < And they say, "Legends of the former peoples which he has written down, and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon." Q 16:103 < And We certainly know that they say, "It is only a human being who teaches him [i.e., the Prophet (ﷺ)]." The tongue of the one they refer to is foreign,1 and this [recitation, i.e., Qur’ān] is [in] a clear Arabic language. What is going on here is the real question. We see accusations that Muhammad is being fed lines that he is made to memorize and repeat to people, claiming they are from God. And then 16:103 seems to be directly referring to a specific individual teaching Muhammad what to say. But the attempt at refutation is that this man pointed out can't be teaching Muhammad, because he speaks a foreign language! Was it Hebrew??

Do you guys watch Blackpilled? He used to be on Youtube but switched to alternative platforms only. He does very good coverage on Hollywood propaganda and memory-holed political events. https://odysee.com/@Blackpilled:b/2021-06-11-00-07-22:e https://odysee.com/@Blackpilled:b/The-most-Jewish-movie-ever-made:e https://odysee.com/@Blackpilled:b/2021-06-13-00-29-53:c

>>7411 I have seen a couple of his videos and have found them to have been of decent quality. I'll have to watch some more of his stuff.

>>7411 No I don't watch Jews nor feds and you shouldn't either.

https://rense.com/Datapages/clarkdata.htm Die Glocke was the Kecksburg Acorn.

>>7413 Why do you think he is a Jew?

>>7422 >Clark McClleland This is the same guy who thinks that niggers are the first to have been on Earth.

>>7434 Really? If anything evidence would suggest the exact opposite.

>>7436 https://invidious.snopyta.org/watch?v=fgCL47UWs2o http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/spacemason/ Clark is a freemason/Jew who thinks that niggers were the first humanz n shiet and they wuz like the Nordic aliens. It's Yakub-tier delusion and holds no grounds nor evidence, considering that only afrocentrists are the only ones to have mentions of basketball niggers in space. Freemasons are not the type to have all the information in the world nor do they tell whole truths during a confessession. His claims are also quite vague and the only thing that validates him is his supposed occupation. It is interesting that he's admitting that the Germans had advanced tech and succesful secret projects.

>>7440 >It is interesting that he's admitting that the Germans had advanced tech and succesful secret projects. Not at all. Following the train of logic with his claims, technologies can be learned and adapted by other peoples and people fall out of grace.

https://grahamhancock.com/dmisrab6/ A research that talks about the ending date of the end of Kali Yuga within 2025 rather 3102 BC.

>>8951 God, I hope it ends in 2025, I can't take much more of this clownworld. It's not like it would immediately turn into the golden age, but even some measure of improvement in the near future would be nice. The real question is whether Kalki comes in 2025, or at the end of the transition period.

>>8951 >BC Meant AD

>>8957 3102 BC is when the Kali Yuga is said to have began. The typical model argued against in that article says we won't be out of it until like 430,000 AD, give or take.

What exactly happens in a Kali Yuga? Like what happens to each race in that event?

>>8959 >The typical model argued against in that article says we won't be out of it until like 430,000 AD, give or take. Are we reading the same article or am I confused? >The timeline also indicates that the ascending Kali Yuga, which is the current epoch in which we are living, will end in 2025 CE. The full manifestation of the next Yuga – the ascending Dwapara – will take place in 2325 CE,

>>8983 Yeah, the article argues that it will end in 2025 CE. What I was saying is that in other model it won't end for some 400,000 years. The reason I said this is because when you replied to this post >>8951 and corrected 'BC' to 'AD' I figured that that applied to both the 2025 and 3102 dates. 3102 is the traditional starting date of the current Kali, not an ending date. Or I could have just grossly misinterpreted what you were saying, so ignore me if I am kek.

>>8979 Here is what the Mahabharata says (which is well over two thousand years old): Degeneration >Know, O Yudhishthira, that the period of life, the energy, intellect and the physical strength of men decrease in every Yuga The three Aryan castes will be reduced to equality with the non-Aryan servant caste >And Brahmanas and Kshatriyas and Vaisyas with their virtue contracted and divested of asceticism and truth will all be reduced to an equality with the Sudras. >And the lowest orders of men will rise to the position of the intermediate ones, and those in intermediate stations will, without doubt, descend to the level of the lowest ones. Even such, O Yudhishthira, will become the state of the world at the end of the Yuga. The Shudra [non-Aryan servant class] will rule > And always oppressed by bad rulers with burthens of taxes, the foremost of the regenerate classes, O lord of the earth, will, in those terrible times, take leave of all patience and do improper acts by becoming even the servants of the Sudras. And Sudras will expound the scriptures, and Brahmanas will wait upon and listen to them, and settle their course of duty accepting such interpretations as their guides. Mass migration >And, O monarch, when the end of the Yuga comes, men abandoning the countries and directions and towns and cities of their occupation, will seek for new ones, one after another. And people will wander over the earth, uttering, 'O father, O son', and such other frightful and rending cries. The world shall become mlecchified [barbarianized] and plundered by false kings >And the kings of the earth with souls steeped in ignorance, and discontented with what they have, will at such a time, rob their subjects by every means in their power. And without doubt the whole world will be mlecchified Mleccha [Barbarian] customs will become dominate >And the whole world will be filled with mleccha behaviour and notions and ceremonies, and sacrifices will cease and joy will be nowhere and general rejoicing will disappear. Worship of scientism >deceived by the false science of reasons, they will direct their hearts towards everything mean and low. https://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03189.htm

>>8979 And here is what the Bhagavata Purana says: Materialism, hedonism and degeneracy >In Kali-yuga, wealth alone will be considered the sign of a man’s good birth, proper behavior and fine qualities. And law and justice will be applied only on the basis of one’s power. >Men and women will live together merely because of superficial attraction, and success in business will depend on deceit. Womanliness and manliness will be judged according to one’s expertise in sex, and a man will be known as a brāhmaṇa just by his wearing a thread. >A person’s spiritual position will be ascertained merely according to external symbols, and on that same basis people will change from one spiritual order to the next. A person’s propriety will be seriously questioned if he does not earn a good living. And one who is very clever at juggling words will be considered a learned scholar. >A person will be judged unholy if he does not have money, and hypocrisy will be accepted as virtue. Marriage will be arranged simply by verbal agreement, and a person will think he is fit to appear in public if he has merely taken a bath. >A sacred place will be taken to consist of no more than a reservoir of water located at a distance, and beauty will be thought to depend on one’s hairstyle. Filling the belly will become the goal of life, and one who is audacious will be accepted as truthful. He who can maintain a family will be regarded as an expert man, and the principles of religion will be observed only for the sake of reputation. Overpopulation >As the earth thus becomes crowded with a corrupt population, whoever among any of the social classes shows himself to be the strongest will gain political power. Degeneration, atheism and a reduction of mankind to the level of shudras >The path of the Vedas will be completely forgotten in human society, and so-called religion will be mostly atheistic. The kings will mostly be thieves, the occupations of men will be stealing, lying and needless violence, and all the social classes will be reduced to the lowest level of śūdras The coming of Kalki >Lord Viṣṇu — the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the spiritual master of all moving and nonmoving living beings, and the Supreme Soul of all — takes birth to protect the principles of religion and to relieve His saintly devotees from the reactions of material work. >Lord Kalki, the Lord of the universe, will mount His swift horse Devadatta and, sword in hand, travel over the earth exhibiting His eight mystic opulences and eight special qualities of Godhead. Displaying His unequaled effulgence and riding with great speed, He will kill by the millions those thieves who have dared dress as kings >After all the impostor kings have been killed, the residents of the cities and towns will feel the breezes carrying the most sacred fragrance of the sandalwood paste and other decorations of Lord Vāsudeva, and their minds will thereby become transcendentally pure. >When Lord Vāsudeva, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, appears in their hearts in His transcendental form of goodness, the remaining citizens will abundantly repopulate the earth. >When the Supreme Lord has appeared on earth as Kalki, the maintainer of religion, Satya-yuga will begin, and human society will bring forth progeny in the mode of goodness. https://vedabase.io/en/library/sb/12/2/ Let's hope he comes in 2025 https://vedabase.io/en/library/sb/12/2/

>>8997 Wasn't Lord Kali the one who said she was going to slaughter all the dark skinned Dravidians? Many Dravidians say that she meant the "bad ones". I assume she meant all dark ones because she just hates the skin colour? Why do pajeets worship gods who want them all dead?

>>9001 Pajeets now believe that "Aryan" is just a state of noble life virtue and mind, rather than any genetic or ethnic caste. They're living in cognitive dissonance, and that's why Islam is growing in India everyday.

>>8993 I'm not the same guy, but yeah I was also confused by this whole fiasco, I guess everyone's being dumb today for some reason. >>9002 Reminder that Pajeet and Pajeet nationalists love jews.

>>9001 >Wasn't Lord Kali the one who said she was going to slaughter all the dark skinned Dravidians? You're referring to the goddess Kali right? If so, I don't know much about her beyond the fact that she is a destroyer of demons. I think she is a very Dravidian goddess herself. But I might just need to do more reading. >Why do pajeets worship gods who want them all dead? I don't think all of them do, but it is pretty funny in light of some of the stuff that pops up in the Vedic scriptures. Even Krishna says in the Bhagavad Gita that he is the source of the four castes and that one should devote all of their actions to him as an offering in accordance with their nature (i.e. in accordance with their caste). The Krishna and the various devas want non-Whites to serve their Aryan masters like they were created to.

>>9001 Kali != Kalki Kali, as well as (Maha)Kala are forms of Parvati & Shiva in their fierce destroyer forms. Kalki is the avatar os the supreme, which some would say of Vishnu, others Krishna. >>8997 >>When the Supreme Lord has appeared on earth as Kalki, the maintainer of religion, Satya-yuga will begin, and human society will bring forth progeny in the mode of goodness. >Let's hope he comes in 2025 Supposedly the Saturn-Jupiter conjunction we has on the winter solstice of 2020 was the sign of the rebirth of Christ (consciousness). However the next Krishna-Christ to be is Maitreya, which is not a singular body, but rather a great many, dare I say legion. And furthermore this is the state of consciousness being born in the people, not necessarily the fleshly birth but rather the rebirth of the man's awareness catalyzed in the light of the divine spirit dwelling behind the optic cross -- in the pinal-pituitary complex. Once a critical mass of people, allegedly the number 144,000, have proper spinal-shakti energy flow and in this inner light, then the outer form as the (collective) avatar, shall be. As I recall the opening of the Kalki rapture went something like this <He shall arrive upon a White horse, swift as lightning but sure as the sun. He shall slay 300,000 demon lords at the speed of thought the moment he appears. By the brilliant arcs of [Kalki] lightning one shall reillumin the spark of truth in life and loose their inequities.

A site with human phenotypes and maps showing the general range: http://humanphenotypes.net/list.html

https://authenticgathazoroastrianism.org A site for ortohodox Zoroastrianians.

'Rightest Critique of Racial Materialism' by Kerry Bolton https://katehon.com/en/article/rightist-critique-racial-materialism Not sure I can wholly agree but I thought I would post it.

>>1159 Here are my favorite pro White websites niggermania.com creativitymovement.net glavasic.com Gab worldtruthvideos.website https://masterrace1488.blogspot.com skadiforums White nations forum

>>14997 This link is dumb, he lies on the meaning of Volk and and how its meaning was more emphasised on "spirit or soul" even though it was actually blood/kin and the philisophy of Faustian spirit at the same time. He also pretends that the Volkich movements weren't heavily inspired by English racism as well, and then goes on a bunch of stupif arguments about how muh metaphysical matters more than material race. Worse he then lies about how the Hellenics weren't Nordic/Europoid, proving furthermore that his view on race is about the same as liberals or Spengler's, because anti-racist always argue in either way on how racism is too "materialisitc" and that the Romans were powerful, because they were mutli-cultural even though that killed Rome. Your race and purity will affect your spirit no matter what. Being half-White or 2/3 German will deteriorate your mind, Weimerica proves this with or without liberalism. If you do not protect the core foundation and inhabitants of your nation, then you will be destroyed. The Romans and Greeks knew this, but this guy tries to use them as a counter-arguement. This is typical delusional Christian nonsense. >>15197 >Gab

>>15197 https://niggermania.co/tom/niggerzoo/index.htm This one is still up after so much time kek

>>15217 niggermania was one of my biggest nigger redpills

>>15213 What's wrong with Gab?

>>15223 1. It's made by a kike 2. It's filled with boomers and kikes 3. It has tons of glowniggers

>>14997 Your link is a website of cuckservatives and disinfo shills. I don't know whether you are trying to agree and shill that racism is bad or do not understand that most of what this guy says isn't factual at all and he just casually lies about the meaning Volk and embarrassingly fails to create convicing arguments on how caring for your kin is too materialistic for metaphysics or not optical for mainstream politics. This isn't even good critque of materialistic racism, if anything you can criticize right-wing White atheists for downplaying the necessity of spirituality without downplaying the reality and importance of race as a whole, and then make stuff up on the meanings of metaphysics and lie on how Volkism was actually civic nationalism. Although it does not come to a surprise to me that articles like this exist on cuckservative platforms. If you haven't realize this site shills (((Dugin))) as many others did (Alex Jones, Lauren Southern, Milo whatever his last name, Richard Spencer, etc).

>>15242 >>15213 I disagree with the article obviously, I really just wanted an excuse to bump the thread. I noticed where the guy seemed to be the most off the mark is when talking about the racial composition of places in the past - Greece in particular, not to mention India and similar places. As we have well-documented on the thread on White history right here on /fascist/, Whites used to live all across the planet. There's just too much evidence. The browning was a gradual historical process, it seems. The only one good critique is that there are types of seemingly racial nationalism that are too materialism and 'modern' for lack of a better word. They are obsessed with quantity, either of numbers, or of stuff like IQ (which leads them to become advocates of race-mixing if they follow the logic to it's end). To deny the conditioning factors of biology is obviously extremely foolish. It's a great modern superstition to think that inequality reigns between varieties in the animal kingdom and yet it magically disappears as soon as we reach the domain of man. People in the past would have realized that it was not a question of either / or (either race or 'spirit) but a question of both / and (race AND spirit). Both are necessary conditions.

>>15244 >The only one good critique is that there are types of seemingly racial nationalism that are too materialism and 'modern' for lack of a better word. They are obsessed with quantity, either of numbers, or of stuff like IQ (which leads them to become advocates of race-mixing if they follow the logic to it's end Well you didn't have to link that astrocious cuckserative article to critque racial materialism. This could of been said in the unpopular opinions thread, and I'm sure most anons here would agree with you, because we had this discussion on cafe and had to tell off the atheist transhumanists who only cared about IQ and genes and denied the existence or neccessity of having a spirit. I can see where you are coming from, because I and other anons have discussed the dedcadance of being immaterialistic and materialistic before. I would argue these types care more for protection of themselves or gains of superpower over their race. They clearly show themselves off as indiviualistic and somewhat support progressive values.

https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-roman-antiquity/ https://www.unz.com/article/how-fake-is-church-history/ https://www.unz.com/article/how-long-was-the-first-millenium/ https://www.unz.com/article/revision-in-islamic-chronology-and-geography/ Some interesting articles on historical fakery that some anons might find interesting. I've got to say, it goes a little wild at times, but it really is kinda suspicious how a lot of these works just appeared randomly and in full in the late Middle Ages after being lost for over a thousand years. It was quite lucrative as well.

https://t.me/Volks_Musik Telegram channel that posts 1000s of NS and WP songs, all properly formatted and tagged and easy to download. Found local skinhead stuff that I never even thought was online.

>>15468 Interesting....I found it weird on how inconsistent the Italian writers were on the accounts of the text of both Greek and Roman texts and how they supposedly had just discovered them out of nowhere. It also should be noted that honest scholars who has studied ancient paganism have found a lack of homoerotic writings within Indo-European mythology and this obessession of sodomy were only mentioned by Jewish and Christian authors. Caesar being worshipped as a literal god and credited with everything that lead to Imperial Rome. And the lack of records of Scandinavia and many other Germanic tribes. Do you also think many of the statues, busts, etc of Rome were also fake as well? Things that were only created after Rome's collaspse and used as political propganda for the church and many republics within Italy?

Rahowa.net for Creator/general WN stuff

>>18870 > Do you also think many of the statues, busts, etc of Rome were also fake as well? Things that were only created after Rome's collaspse and used as political propganda for the church and many republics within Italy? Yeah, probably. Just look at the case of "Laocoon and his Sons" mentioned in the one article, supposedly from 40 BC. Are we really to believe this statue was unearthed in a vineyard in 1506? That this lay buried in almost perfect shape for nearly 1400 years and no one noticed it? https://archive.fo/L2rG5

>>18870 >Do you also think many of the statues, busts, etc of Rome were also fake as well? Knowing how easy it is to fake isotopes and their unreliablity to give accurate dates, it is possible to fake forge modern paintings, sculptures or even structural works as something of the past. Note that evolutionists sperg out when you are skeptical of isotope measurements and call you a creationist for doing so, despite the fact that Darwin's research has been outsed as fraud along with the other hundreds of forgeries that were said to prove his theories correct.

>>18935 After uncovering a lot of this stuff about the problems of these dating methods and the presuppositions underlining them, the massive holes in a lot of these theories that you mention and many other aspects of our history, this world is actually a lot more mysterious and unknown than they want you to believe. It seems like the goal is to act like the experts know everything. They pretend to completely understand the beginning of the universe (lol space, time and matter just appeared randomly from nothing, bro, and we know precisely that this happened 14 billion years ago!), the exact timeline of human history, the origin of life, what is going on in space, the composition, size and age of stars and galaxies millions of light years away, the existence of consciousness, the UFO phenomena, etc. It's all bullshit. Not to say that they're always wrong and whatever they say is false - that's the wrong attitude to take. Contrarianism isn't healthy, and I never set out to be contrarian, but it just so happens that in every topic that I have dug into, things are almost the exact opposite of how we are taught they are. Not in every case, but in a sizeable amount of them. On one hand, it's a bit disconcerting that so much of the average understanding of the world that people have is completely fake. They live in a comfortable bubble, thinking they are so far advanced beyond the 'benighted past', but on the other hand, it does lend a sense of wonder back into the world of those who have overcome the conditioning. >mfw

>>7411 He used to be good but now he just makes videos for money to fund his compound. I don't like the way he trashtalks his audience. I still listen occasionally but don't enjoy tuning in just to hear someone talk shit and go on and on about how hopeless our situation is. His best content was actually on YouTube back in the day, followed by his earlier content on Odysee. I rarely learn anything new from him now, definitely not worth listening to such a long stream.

>>18937 >They live in a comfortable bubble, thinking they are so far advanced beyond the 'benighted past' Indeed, and you can thank Christcucks for that, because they've invented this idea that the past was filled with primitive savages who rape and murder 24/7 and only lived in mudhuts. It was also them who pioneered an idealism that mankind is better off living within the city walls and hoping for some magical miracles to occur only for them to become effeminate and weak. Most technological advancement being credited to Christianity is even more delusional and quite amusing as comedy. >>18949 You shouldn't expect a blackpiller to not evolve into a gigantic faggot.

>>18984 For an opposite perspective, you should check out Alain de Benoist's book 'On Being a Pagan'. He essentially makes the opposite argument, pointing out that the Bible has a consistently anti-civilization perspective. As man becomes more settled, degeneracy increases. Man in his perfection lived in harmony with nature and God in Eden, not even needing clothes, and not knowing death. The Fall changed this. It is akin to the change from the Krita Yuga to the Kali Yuga. In the beginning of the Bible, men and women are living for nearly a thousand years before dying, but degeneracy sets in slow. As examples of the anti-civilization bias God accepts the offerings of Abel over Cain. Cain was a farmer, Abel was a shepherd. Cain the farmer is cursed by God for murdering his brother, and goes to live out East. The cursed Cain actually goes and builds a city for himself, and other descendants of his are also involved with the formation of technology of various kinds, such as Tubal Cain, who was a worker of bronze and iron. Interestingly, polygamy also originated within this city-dwelling line, and other degenerate practices. Later on in the Old Testament, of course, Sodom and Gomorrah are the prototypical examples of urban degeneracy and are destroyed by God, and God charges Abraham to wander as a nomad with his wife, nephew, sons, soldiers and livestock in order to avoid become an urban degenerate. The tower of Babel is another good example. De Benoist gives many examples of this. When it comes to the attitudes of many historical Christians though, especially more modern ones, I think you are speaking fairly accurately however.

>>18993 >Bible has a consistently anti-civilization perspective >As man becomes more settled, degeneracy increases. Man in his perfection lived in harmony with nature and God in Eden, not even needing clothes, and not knowing death. This is just Hesoid's Golden Age, but in a Christian perspective. But he's wrong, because Christianity is not anti-civilization and primitive or anything. What he describes with God and nature in Eden is no different than what pagans thought or knew of the past before the ages began to descend, Christians are just anti-material and detest earthly life and see it inferior and unworthy of caring for compared to living in heaven, although you must not harm or destroy God's creations before death. They are pro-civilization, because it can and had allowed them to enforce and safely enact their usual spiritual impulses. In the perspective of the Christian, Jesus, God, and their followers created the concept of society for the purpose of bible fundmentalism. While it is true that average Christian person sees culture and civilization as merely temporal, this thought can changed when it adapts to the Old Testament and the Gospels (Ex: An Orthodox clergymen arguing that Russia was only established by and for Jesus or Russians are the true Isralites n shiet). Civilization is neccessary in order to proselytize men around the world, otherwise they will fail to convince anyone that their prophet and God are cardinal, which is the only reason why it is so popular across the world today. After all, even after the fall of Imperium Romanum, they still see themselves as the true successors of the empires and that their job is to continue the works of "unifying" and "purifying" the world under Christian principles. >Later on in the Old Testament, of course, Sodom and Gomorrah are the prototypical examples of urban degeneracy and are destroyed by God If anything, the story of Sodom and Gomorrah is just the jews setting their interpretations of what happens when you reject the jude God(s), and not a case against all that is urban. I think Benoist either just hates Christianity and trying his hardest to counter-influence it or he's trying to appeal to his alt-right fanbase.

>>19056 >This is just Hesoid's Golden Age, but in a Christian perspective Of course, the idea of a 'Fall' can be found in almost every spiritual tradition. It would be a mistake to say that Hesiod was the inventor of this or anything, however. >Christians are just anti-material and detest earthly life and see it inferior and unworthy of caring for compared to living in heaven I disagree, this is a view that is not founded on the actual Christian sources. If we are to compare the worldviews of many pagans with that of the Christian / Jewish worldview, we are inevitably led to think that the Christian view is actually far more 'this-worldly' than the average pagan view of the past. If we examine the pagan sources, it is clear that they often ascribed to a strict form of mind-body dualism. The center-point of the human being, i.e. his essence, was his soul. They didn't have a soul, but rather they were soul. The pagan afterlife, most often, was conceived of in terms of disembodied bliss in the heavens, or being stuck in some sort of reincarnation trap until they reached liberation. One can just think of Orphism, Pythagoreanism, much of Platonic and Neo-Platonic thought, Vedic / Upanishadic ideas. The phrase "sōma sēma", or the body as a prison-house for the soul comes distinctly from pagan thought. This is not even to point to examples of ancient pagan pessimism such as the wisdom of Silenus, the writings of Hegesias of Cyrene, Buddhists, Jains, etc. According to the traditional Biblical view, it is clear that man is created in the image of the deity, and is an integral whole of spirit, body and soul, which itself can be seen as reflection of the Trinity. The entire body, one reads if they look at the Patristic sources, is created in the image of God, not just the soul as would those influenced by Platonic thought would say. And of course, the Bible says that everything in God's creation is to be thought of as being essentially 'good', namely Genesis 1:31 and 1 Timothy 4:4. Unlike the pagan traditions, what we see in the Christian framework is an idea where the universe has for an interim period entered a 'subnatural' state due to a shift from theocentrism to self-centeredness, but it will be restored, and man will be restored in body, soul and spirit upon the new heaven and earth to come. This strictly embodied aspect is unlike anything seen in pagan worldviews. The material can be sanctified. The Patristic view again is that mankind are mediators, priests of creation, leading us to a sort of sacramental cosmology. >If anything, the story of Sodom and Gomorrah is just the jews setting their interpretations of what happens when you reject the jude God(s), and not a case against all that is urban. It is a clear case of urban degeneracy. It is quite akin to the modern cities which are overflowing with homosexuals and other deviants. Interestingly as well, in the Book of Joshua when the Israelites finally move into the land being given to them by God as promised to Abraham, we read that these people are marked for extermination because they are degenerate, and have sunk into practices such as sacrificing their children to Moloch. So a non-settled culture is told to replace a settled, degenerating culture, and to settle among them. And interestingly, as soon as the Israelites settle in the land of the Canaanites, there is a massive uptick in degeneracy in books such as Judges, where gangs of men come around and demand that they may 'know' (fuck) a traveling man in Judges 19, and end up raping and murdering one of the traveler's concubine. Almost exactly like Sodom and Gomorrah, and it takes place after the Israelites settle and degenerate into worshiping Baal. One can see an extended polemic against urbanism in the Bible, and thought it may not be explicitly arguing that the city is inherently 'evil' (such would conflict with what I have previously said in this post), it is assuredly saying that the city quite easily leads to a denaturing and moral corruption of its inhabitants, which is something that we can see to this very day. >I think Benoist either just hates Christianity and trying his hardest to counter-influence it or he's trying to appeal to his alt-right fanbase. He's a Nietzchean, the book is really a misnomer.

>>18935 >Knowing how easy it is to fake isotopes and their unreliablity to give accurate dates I'm a sucker for more information. Please share. As for history, Napoleon Bonaparte once had access to privy archives. He read them and concluded that history, or let's say History, was bunk af. >>18885 That real or is it Beyond the Glowdome? damn good bread here too, must find a way to borrow moar time

>>18993 >de Benoist He belongs to the new right clique in Europe, right? I haven't heard that many good things about them lately. >Eden bester, not even chairs Is that shilling for naked timelord niggers on grass again?

>>19293 Yeah, de Benoist is part of the Nouvelle Droit. I don't think they've been in the news recently though. The Jew running for president in France isn't connected with them as far as I'm aware. Last time I heard any of them mentioned was probably the last time a mass-shooting happened, because Renaud Camus' great replacement theory is often mentioned in connection with people like Crusius and Tarrant. de Benoist is a pretty good author. Underrated.

>>19290 >I'm a sucker for more information. Please share. From what I have read it's carbon-dating is somewhat accurate out to 50,000 years. The accuracy of this dating method also crucially relies on the assumption that the amount of the carbon-14 in the atmosphere has been constant, and that the decay rate into nitrogen proceeds constantly. There are numerous examples of modern mollusk shells that can be dated to be thousands of years old, freshly killed animals having calculated ages of over a millennium, among other things. It is also well known that over the past 60 plus years atmospheric radiocarbon levels have almost doubled due to above-ground nuclear weapons testing. Who knows what effects this has had on the accuracy of some measurements, if any. It has also been theorized that there is in general a fluctuation of the amount of carbon 14 in the atmospehre over time due to changes in the Earth's magnetic field, which would change the deflection of cosmic ray particles streaming towards Earth from the sun. The general theory is that carbon-14 is thought to be mainly a product of bombardment of the atmosphere by cosmic rays, so if the intensity varies over time, this would also affect the amount of carbon 14 in the environment at a given time, and thus effect datings. But even if it's perfect it only works out to 50,000 years and scientists readily admit this.

>>19093 >I disagree, this is a view that is not founded on the actual Christian sources. If we are to compare the worldviews of many pagans with that of the Christian / Jewish worldview, we are inevitably led to think that the Christian view is actually far more 'this-worldly' than the average pagan view of the past. If we examine the pagan sources, it is clear that they often ascribed to a strict form of mind-body dualism. The center-point of the human being, i.e. his essence, was his soul. They didn't have a soul, but rather they were soul. The pagan afterlife, most often, was conceived of in terms of disembodied bliss in the heavens, or being stuck in some sort of reincarnation trap until they reached liberation. Such statements need a bit of nuance methinks. The dualism might have not been so obvious in Greek and Nordic conceptions of life and the afterlife, and the idea that it amounted to a disembodied bliss is even less accurate. Maybe another type of body. The Egyptians had a complex soul-system which was very much a definition of something that was possessed within. The Nordics and Greeks also considered the soul to be akin to a life energy, breathed in. You on the other hand seems to be chiefly thinking of considerations that appear to have been exclusive to smaller groups, often esoteric ones more than strictly religious. >He's a Nietzchean, the book is really a misnomer. Anyone is one today, for the same confusing reasons that effeminate if not straight out homosexuals can signal out their reading and support of Evola's Revolt Against the Modern World.

>>19314 I guess it depends on the rate and depth of penetration of radioactive particles and rays. Such risks of generalized inconsistency would be largely minimized when studying elements which have been buried for a long time if the ground itself would have acted as a natural shield. If there is a noticeable disturbance due to some factor picked from the few ones you mentioned, then either all dates would be stretched over a longer period or compressed. These are the two possibilities and everything would likely be affected globally, the same way, one temporal way or another. What way is another topic for scrutiny. There are other methods which have been developed during the last twenty years though, including one the name of which escapes me for now, but which I remember being based on the use of light and seems mainly applied to the study of the age of rock formations. Mind you, even if our history could be well known up to 50000 years, that would be terrific. Right now we barely manage to get anything comfortably detailed starting at -3500 BC or so.

>>19433 >You on the other hand seems to be chiefly thinking of considerations that appear to have been exclusive to smaller groups, often esoteric ones more than strictly religious. Which are the only ones that really matter, let's be real. Even the Romans distinguished between 'religion' and 'superstition'. What the masses believe in most cases is pure fantasies and myths. I cannot tell you how many times I have seen people such as Cicero, or Xenophanes make fun of the common people for believing in the myths concerning the gods as they are written.

Not a link, but a pdf with interesting theories on the concept and different science of what the universe consists. I do not agree with all of it, but I personally find it entertaining to read things that think outside of mainstream "science".

https://piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=xIbD-Dp2Hyc https://piped.kavin.rocks/watch?v=IS6WPqilR5M

Multiple neonicotinoids in children’s cerebro-spinal fluid, plasma, and urine >Little is known on the effect of chronic human low-level exposure to nAChRs (nicotinic acetycholine receptors) disrupters such as NN (neonicotinoids), which, especially in human foetuses’ and children’s developing brains, could potentially lead to later cerebral dysfunctions. >In humans, NN have been associated with small-for-gestational-age neonates, congenital malformations, autism spectrum disorder, memory loss and finger tremor. >NN toxicological studies in rodents or mammals/human cell-lines have been shown to be cytotoxic, genotoxic, hepatotoxic, haematotoxic, nephrotoxic and potentially immunotoxic. >Among pesticides, NN definitely represent a potential significant public-health risk. >All CSF and plasma samples in 14 children were positive for at least one NN. >All but one urine samples were positive for ≥ one NN. https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-021-00821-z

Not an interesting link, but a interesting PDF, that argues that a large portion of both pre-modern Europe, Christian theology and ancient history are based on lies that were used as propaganda. The authors argue that the reinassiance was a golden age of forgery and there exists many famous works that are treated as facts by modern scholars are in-fact fabrications that were purposely created by patriots and branded as things invented by Classical Greece or Late Antiquity Romans for political agendas. Well-known forgeries such as the Donation of Constantine and the translation of the Corpus Hermeticum from Greek to Latin set as examples of how forgeries for the church and state were not of 'sin' and were a highly desired commodity that were widely funded. I recommend this if you hold skepticism to our history which has been mostly been told by Jews (Abrahamists) and find that the history and many writings/translation of the ancient world are vague and inconsistent. It isn't impossible for our entire history of the world to have been a lie and collectively followed through for religious and political purposes as neither Christian, Islamist nor Jew lose not much of anything from advocating today's perspective on history.

>>22480 I'm dumb and forgot about the link since I can't load the pdf. https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=1978675EFFC0FC0A8C19199828F1E126

>>1159 Very heavy schizophrenic /x/-tier blog that leans into Serranic Esoteric Hitlerism, has great articles on the infighting within the Third Reich, Vimanas, and hidden histories. Below are a select series of articles for a preview of the content inside. The Bormann Treachery https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-bormann-faction-part-1.html https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2021/05/the-bormann-faction-part-ii.html https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2021/06/the-borman-faction-iii-rat-der-gotter.html Redpills on Histiography https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2021/01/mar-17-2019-pm-hervarar-saga-or-how.html Black Sun Rising https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2014/02/p-margin-bottom-0.html https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2014/02/black-sun-rising-part-2.html https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2014/02/black-sun-rising-3.html https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2014/03/black-sun-rising-part-4.html https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2014/04/black-sun-rising-part-5.html https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2014/06/black-sun-rising-part-6-one.html >Rather unfortunately, the second part is under a different name entirely and I cannot find it Freya https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2019/04/of-freyja-and-lilith-goddesses-and.html https://jackheart2014.blogspot.com/2019/04/of-freyja-and-lilith-goddesses-and_30.html

The old Neinchan Jew org thread: https://archive.is/PNzW1

Judaism posits six different genders. This sheds massive light on the transgender ideology being shilled so heavily in our societies today. I was shocked to learn this, but on another level, not surprised at all. According to Rabbi Elliot Kukla: Androgynous >an intersex person (having some aspects of both male and female genitalia). 149 references in the Mishna and Talmud (1st-8th centuries CE); 350 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes (2nd-16th centuries CE). Ay'lonit: >literally "little ram"; a female who has not shown physical signs of typical sexual maturity by the age of 20 (some say 18); presumed infertile; often possessing masculine characteristics. 80 references in Mishna and Talmud; 40 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes. Ish >a man/eligible husband; one whose fertility is not in question and has shown some secondary sex characteristics by around age 13. Ishah >a woman/eligible wife; one whose fertility is not in question and has shown some secondary sex characteristics by around age 12 and is clearly developing by age 12.5. Saris >a male who has not shown signs of typical sexual maturity by the age of 20; a eunuch. 156 references in Mishna and Talmud; 379 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes. >Saris Chama: congenital sterility in a male (e.g., atesticularity) >Saris Adam: a castrated male; one made sterile intentionally or via accidental injury. Tumtum >a person of indeterminate gender; one whose genitals are obscured or not clearly male or female. 181 references in Mishna and talmud; 335 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes. https://archive.fo/0lQ4O https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/196414.5?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en

>>22977 Isn’t it funny that behind every piece of modern culture there is influence from jewish culture? I think that we are either very close to or in the peak of the Kali Yuga because of this.

>>22980 It's really amazing, and it makes perfect sense the more one ponders it. The more one understands the JQ, the more every degenerate aspect of modern culture can be only truly understood in relation to (((them))). It really makes me wonder how the exact development of the transgender ideology went in the West. Obviously Magnus Hirschfeld is a key figure. Judith Butler was one of the first Jewish feminists to begin to deconstruct the concept of woman and to pave the way for the idea that gender and sex refer to anything real. One can wonder how much these people were directly or indirectly influenced by the Talmud. Many Jews are similarly involved in the idea of social constructionism. I can hardly imagine how deep this rabbit hole goes. One needs to look more into "Jennifer" Pritzker, a Jewish transgender billionaire who has donated and astroturfed for transgender activism, and "Martine" Rothblatt, who founded the Terasem Movement, which (according to their website) "is a 501c3 not-for-profit charity endowed for the purpose of educating the public on the practicality and necessity of greatly extending human life, consistent with diversity and unity, via geoethical nanotechnology and personal cyberconsciousness, concentrating in particular on facilitating revivals from biostasis." This is transhumanist shilling, needless to say. Terasem is actually a Jew-founded transhumanist cult, though: <In addition to being a business leader, Rothblatt is an author and also founded a religion, called the Terasem Movement. One of her sons, Gabriel, is a pastor. It has its roots in her upbringing as an Orthodox Jew — but more from the cultural side than the religious — combined with tech and what the Post described as "Zen-like yoga." Rothblatt is also the author of a book called "Apartheid of Sex: A Manifesto on the Freedom of Gender. Rothblatt is quoted saying: < “And in this book I pointed out that forcing everybody to be either male or female is a kind of sexual apartheid. This is not scientifically accurate. There are great biologists before me, like Professor Anne Fausto-Sterling from Brown University. And she has pointed out that a significant percent of all births are, if you want to call it, intersexual or transgendered, in some way or another." https://www.huffpost.com/entry/martine-rothblatt-transgender_n_5849372 https://archive.fo/PL34x He is, unsurprisingly, a vocal advocate and donor for transgender causes and transhumanist agendas. Jews are dangerous https://www.advocate.com/transgender/2017/5/08/transgender-ceo-martine-rothblatt-talks-transition-trump-and-true-love-video https://archive.fo/FnMAT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Pritzker https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martine_Rothblatt

A btfo of medcucks and their cousins, the Jews. https://eginotes.blogspot.com/2018/11/race-brain-function-and-cortical.html?m=1 <Intracranial and brain volumes and cortical surface area progressively increase with the amount of inferred NW European ancestry, and these measures are approximately 5% larger in the 10% of individuals with the most NW European ancestry compared to the 10% with the most SE European ancestry. This percentage increase matches the percentage increase in cranial length and breadth observed along the same NW-SE geographic axis in the skull data set and cannot be attributed to a correlation with body size since we controlled for height and weight. This correlation involves specific – not global – brain morphology because hippocampal, basal ganglia, ventricular, and cerebellar volumes and average cortical thickness are not associated with NW-SE ancestry. <Next, we performed both a region of interest analysis and vertex-based tests across the cortex to test whether the surface area of specific cortical regions showed more significant association with the degree of NW-SE ancestry. We found that cortical surface area predominantly in the frontal and temporal lobes from both hemispheres is significantly associated and is 4–9% larger among 10% of individuals with the most NW European ancestry compared to 10% with the most SE European ancestry. We found a similar frontotemporal pattern of association with the degree of NW-SE ancestry with a vertex-based analysis.

Also on Talmuds being anti-gentile and denouncing the lie about its supposedly anti-Christian character. https://www.satanslibrary.org/666BlackSun/Talmud_and_Christianity.html

>>23069 >satanslibrary.org/666BlackSun I’m not criticizing necessarily the content of the link, but it’s embarrassing that people think that this is a good aesthetic to embrace. It reeks of edgy 15-years olds and Hitler is even on record denouncing Jews as a Satanic power that has taken over Germany. Not something to identify with.

>>23074 I am aware of its shitty aesthetic. I only care about said info, but anything the creator of the site shills will be avoided and condemned. >It reeks of edgy 15-years olds and Hitler is even on record denouncing Jews as a Satanic power The blog I've posted argues that the meaning of "Satan and Satanic" is a negative synonym for gentile or enemy. As far as the article show they seems to only be a regular NS pagan. I haven't seen any Satanism support from the creator of the website, but at the same time I have not totally read everything that consists of this site. I doubt Hitler would call Jews the same word they use against goys.

>>23080 >The blog I've posted argues that the meaning of "Satan and Satanic" is a negative synonym for gentile or enemy. There's no reason to identify with Jewish terms and to fit ourselves snugly within their paradigms. Instead of saying to them 'haha, yes, we are evil and satanic just like you say!', the correct countermove is a transvaluation of values, an inversion according to Aryan criteria, where we turn around and tell the Jews that actually they are the ones who are evil, demonic and satanic, and that the Aryan worldview is the true worldview of life, goodness, beauty, truth and divinity. It's also a trick to get non-WN Whites to hate WNs since they are more or less attached to the usage of these terms in various functions, even mostly mundane (any healthy White man, Christian or not, can recognize the archetype of 'satanic' or 'demonic') >I doubt Hitler would call Jews the same word they use against goys. Go to 3:06 and watch to 3:11 in this video, we can hear him use the term 'Satanisch' https://www.bitchute.com/video/f0nXHOgp4ra0/ And this is really the perfect term for them. Jews are Satanic. What do Jews do? They rebel against the Natural Order (and by extension God, if you will), just like the Christian idea of Satan as the prototype of all hubris, rebellion against the good, the holy and the divine. In contrast to what some say, The Jew-controlled West is the real Faustian civilization, selling out all its values, stability and long-term happiness for short-term power, pleasures, so-called 'knowledge' and degeneracy. It's hard to deny that what the Jews are doing is an expression of metaphysical evil. Even if one is not Christian (as I am not, and neither was Hitler), it is clear that there is a demonic / Satanic force driving the Jews.

>>23082 >There's no reason to identify with Jewish terms and to fit ourselves snugly within their paradigms. But you are willingly to use Jewish terms, no? >Instead of saying to them 'haha, yes, we are evil and satanic just like you say!', That's not what the article js saying. The term Satan merely means "adversary or one who resists", in context this refers to rejecting or resisting the Judeo God of the Israelites. In the eyes of those who are evil, they view us as the evil ones for not being like (((them))). I agree that we shouldn't latch on to Jewish terms, but to call Jews "Satanic" or fear being called one is a subset of a Judeo-Christian mindset. We are not demons, but we are to the Jews, which is quite literally the exact opposite to what an evil spirit or being is conceptualized so I have no problem with being Satanic, but I refuse to be a degenerate. Satanists Jews exist only to give a bad name to what Satanism originally meant, which was everything that went against YHWH's control over the world. Instead of Satanic we should just denounce Jews in a proper terminology that represents them perfectly outside of Hebrew.

>>23084 >But you are willingly to use Jewish terms, no? It's ironic that you bring this up, because this is exactly what people who come around saying that we should adopt labels like 'Satanic' as something good for White people, as if this will harm the Jews in some way. Where are the Jews who are throwing around the term 'Satanic' constantly? They don't exist. Anyone who knows anything about Jews know that they do not even believe in Satan, and that the term Satan in Judaism is used for the 'evil inclination' in individuals, it is a personification of something that doesn't exist, very much like how Buddhists use the term Māra as a catch-all term for the personification of temptation, desire, and evil. Adopting terms associated with a being that millions of Whites literally believe exists is one of the dumbest moves that one could possibly make, indeed so dumb that I wouldn't doubt that it is purposely foisted into pro-White circles by those who want to undermine pro-White activism. You're never going to make White people think that something 'Satanic' is akshually good, because it's not good. Adopting some alleged and extremely obscure shade of meaning in the word is stupid. It is akin to claiming that families are a form of slave-management because the Latin term 'familia', referring to the household, or the slaves / servants of a household, which ultimately comes from another noun 'famulus', meaning a slave. The usage of 'Satan' or 'Satanic' in common use today has nothing to do with Hebrew usages of this term. Ironically you are the one claiming that we should make the term even more Hebraic. >everything that went against YHWH's control over the world. Jews don't understand the idea of Satan like this. In fact its improper to even use the term 'Satan' like a proper noun in the Jewish context. The Book of Job has a 'satan' who is in God's revenue who is permitted by God to tempt Job. The being is under the control of God and listens to his commands. So it doesn't mean what you think it does. >Instead of Satanic we should just denounce Jews in a proper terminology that represents them perfectly outside of Hebrew. The term is quite easily used as a weapon against Jews. They hate it, because it identifies them with metaphysical evil. Jews are harbingers of this very force. This is why they get so scared when people start looking into Hollywood occultism and rituals that they get themselves so involved in, not to mention the fact that they are still sperging out over the idea of the 'Satanic panic' (which involved real phenomena, unlike kikes tell you). The word has power to normalfags. That is why Hitler used it, and that is why it is continued to be used by so many today, regardless of affiliation.

>>23085 definitely. Satan is highly stigmatized, so the attempt to introduce the term into our circles is likely sabotage, as you said. the "Synagogue of Satan" referred to in Revelations is often interpreted as referring to Jews, and that seems to piss them off.

Savitri Devi uses the term as well: >In other words, seen from the higher standpoint from which all "politics" as appear as consequences, never as causes, the 1939-1945 World War is, in the midst of the gigantic struggle of polar opposites, without beginning or end, a tragic local instance of the fated victory of the satanic Forces — i.e. of the Forces of untruth — near the end of an Age of Gloom >>23088 (heil'd) I've had a good deal of success pushing a handful of Christians in the right direction via this sort of argumentation. Most Christians only absorb what the Bible says at a very superficial level, and once you point out to them what the Jews did, and what the Jews are doing, they will inevitably connect the dots and become very woke on the Jews. This doesn't work with everyone though. The Bible seems to be a double-edged sword at times. Still going to use it make Jews mad though

>>23085 >It's ironic that you bring this up, because this is exactly what people who come around saying that we should adopt labels like 'Satanic' as something good for White people, as if this will harm the Jews in some way. Where are the Jews who are throwing around the term 'Satanic' constantly? They're called Christians. >Anyone who knows anything about Jews know that they do not even believe in Satan No shit, you're pilpuling. Jews do worship in a literal demon. >it is a personification of something that doesn't exist It's a personification of gentiles/paganism. Everything that is Aryan is considered Satanic. >Buddhist Not even remotley the same thing as they refer to adharmic behavior. >muh millions Millions of Whites are dumb enough to allow their ethnic replacement to go on, while worshipping the same deity who is hates them. No one said anything about adopting Satanism, the reason why I posted this article was to expose the nature of Abrahamic faith and their take over of our terminology. >undermine pro-White activism None of what I posted is against WN. Why are you acting like a sperg? >You're never going to make White people think that something 'Satanic' is akshually good Just like how fascist can't get Whites to realize that saving their race is actually good either. Most Whites are bluepilled Christcucks, of course Satanists are not going to convince as they minds are of the Judeo-Christians. >The Book of Job has a 'satan' who is in God's revenue who is permitted by God to tempt Job Again you're being retarded and avoided what I said, the YHYWH kike isn't God and the Book of Job does under the context to Jews who have read. His post has already argued against this notion that Yahweh is God. The term is quite easily used as a weapon against Jews No it isn't, they literally acknowledge it when Christians refer to them it. Why do you think there are so many Jews in "Satanists" movement. If they hate it, then it's because you are calling them an enemy to their own God. >

>>23088 >>23091 (1)s >muh Christians Of course it's the retarded Christcuck, this explains why your arguments are dumb af.

>>23096 >Why do you think there are so many Jews in "Satanists" movement. Literally undermining your own argument. I guess Whites should label themselves as Satanists too! You are literally too dumb to think that a term might have lost its original meaning or referent but still could have power as a polemical tool. Of course this hasn't occurred for you though, since you are unable to even think rationally and accuse everyone who doesn't constantly shit on Christianity as 'Christian' themselves. I guess Hitler and Savitri Devi were Christians too!

>>23097 Christcucks are retarded, but he's right. The jewish worldview is one of moral relativity, where rules are meant to be bent to their greatest extent and Yahweh's might makes right, and the Aryan worldview is one about aiding the natural cycles of the world through adhering to it's eternal laws. The dueling dichotomy of Satanism (rejection of the natural order) vs. Aryan Thought (embracement of the natural order) is what needs to be returned to, because Aryan belief system recognize dueling concepts such as the masculine vs. the feminine, dark vs light, etc, etc. It is a war of moral relativity versus stable morality. If you want to say that satanism is not an Aryan term, and that it belongs wholly to the jews, I would disagree with you. Satan has become an aryan term because it has come to symbolize all that is antithetical to aryan society. When one mentions satan, pictures of greed and lust of disasters proportions come to mind, and it's physical form is almost identical in the minds of Whites to the baal and molech that are worshiped in modern times. At one time, christians in southern france adopted the idea that satan and yahweh were locked in an eternal battle. Unlike the whole of christianity, the concept of satan has come to represent a idea that fits perfectly into the aryan worldview, which is why the term is safe to use.

>>23084 >Satanists Jews exist only to give a bad name to what Satanism originally meant, which was everything that went against YHWH's control over the world Bingo. They are intentionally flooding it with degeneracy, nihilism etc. and giving it a bad name so they can use it to scare away people from seeking the truth. Just as they used to dress in German uniforms and burn villages in Eastern Europe during WW2 so they could get the locals to hate Germany and embrace communism since they no longer had any property. Only Christcucks get triggered by that term, but it's no different than a term Fascist to most normies today. Hitler is basically a devil of modernism, and it was no different many centuries ago when kikes kept portraying our ancestral deities as evil monsters. Telling someone that you are a fascist/natsoc invokes the same negative connotations as telling some christcuck that you are a satanist.

>>23102 >Literally undermining your own argument No I did not as I already said that Jews co-opted Satanic movements. You're being disingenuous again. As usual you bring no quality to this board other than being a moron and samefagging, because your arguments are just like Christ, shit. >You are literally too dumb to think that a term might have lost its original meaning or referent but still could have power as a polemical tool. You literally are too retarded to understand what words mean and how they impact social control. Their intent and how people use them as a scapegoat to fade you away from learning the truth. You're still in the cave due to your Judeo-Christian mind. The word Satanic is no different than Nazi, for it is a buzz-word and all direction of examples of Satanism has been forwarded towards degenerate atheists who hate their parents and themselves. The case of Hitler and Savitri using it is because they're either looking for to appeal to christcucks or cannot find the proper term to call Jews out of their name. The Jew detest being called "Satanic", because you are technically saying they are without their own (((God))). It's stupidly pathetic and does not work against as they will either laugh it off or acknowledge it when a Christnigger says it against them as they know you have a different perspective of Yahweh. I've seen only those who are apart of the Christian Identity movements, such as yourself, unironically believe it works due to your we wuzzing. As usual you never argue only sperg. You've already been btfo'd on why Christianity isn't fascist, at this point you're a just a lowly shill who's kvetching at the rise of fascism leading to the death of corspe worshippers. >>23104 >But he's right Thus you samefag again. As you fail to understand my post the exact same way, but in pagan terminology. >The dueling dichotomy of Satanism Satanism is a umbrella term for those who are against YHWH. Does it come as a coincidence that modern Satanist also worship the same God as mudslimes, kikes and christcucks do, but again it's in another interpretation of YHWH? That modern Satanism exists in purpose as an another anti-White tool, despite it's history of re-kindling of Aryan faith as Albert Pike and other free-masons, because before they got their movements taken over? He's not correct and if you were really a pagan you would know what "Satanic" truly means. Tell me where have I desired "Satanism", I want to destroy the slave-morality and lies of Jews who want you to destroy Aryan occultism and secrets, which is why Christians latch on to this word so much.

>>23107 >Bingo. They are intentionally flooding it with degeneracy, nihilism etc. and giving it a bad name so they can use it to scare away people from seeking the truth. Thank you anon for explaining what I obviously meant. Finally someone who does not think like a literal nigger these past posts. >Just as they used to dress in German uniforms and burn villages in Eastern Europe during WW2 so they could get the locals to hate Germany and embrace communism since they no longer had any property. Exactly. Jews always make their opposition to look bad as their justification for why their supposed knowledge and teachings are superior. Jesuits are also known to do something similar during 16-20th century Europe to avoid the rise and revival of pagan cults.

>>23111 >Does it come as a coincidence that modern Satanist also worship the same God as mudslimes, kikes and christcucks do, but again it's in another interpretation of YHWH? Not at all. >That modern Satanism exists in purpose as an another anti-White tool, despite it's history of re-kindling of Aryan faith as Albert Pike and other free-masons, because before they got their movements taken over? This is also evident. > He's not correct and if you were really a pagan you would know what "Satanic" truly means. I can tell you what it means to the jews. To the jews, the world is and will always be controlled by yahweh, in all of it’s aspects. “Satan” is but one of its aspects, and they view it as a result of them loosening their hold on the “goyim”. So, to them, satan is the brief straying away from yahweh in the sea of eternity. In this aspect, we agree. But to Aryans, the greatest manifestation of evil, which they now give the name satan, is in a constant battle with the good. One views it as a brief detour, while the other views it as a cosmic struggle. Satanism is a convenient name for the list, desire, and sloth that is the immortal enemy of the good. We only disagree in the fact that the term “satanism” should be used to describe this concept. You could describe it as the jewish nature, but most would not understand what is being said as well as with satanism. > Tell me where have I desired "Satanism" You haven’t

>>23111 >samefagging This accusation needs to be a bannable offense in the absence of positive evidence. One faggot, probably you, derails basically every discussion with accusations of 'muh Christians' and 'muh samefags'. Since you're using Tor, you probably know that the .onion for this site right now is literally functioning like shit, no wonder IDs are changing constantly.

>>23112 I'm not advocating for using such terms, but if you still get triggered by the word "Satan", you haven't been deprogrammed enough from the Jewish tropes and will sooner or later succumb to their conditioning. Also, it never occurred to those people that Jews might be intentionally causing all this degeneracy and clown world so they could associate it with their opposition, conditioning normies to accept the absolutist tyranny of their desert demon and them as his "chosen leaders of humanity" as a "solution". It's right there in the books. >Jesuits are also known to do something similar during 16-20th century Europe to avoid the rise and revival of pagan cults. Mind telling more?

>>23107 >Hitler is basically a devil of modernism, and it was no different many centuries ago when kikes kept portraying our ancestral deities as evil monsters. yes, many if not most "demons" are recasted pagan gods. >>23104 yes, much of modernity is built on relativism, and deviation from what is natural and right. to give just one example, the modern toilet, which became ubiquitous in the West in the 19th century, is actually unhealthy and bad for you. Humans are supposed to squat to take a shit, not sit down. Many conditions such as appendicitis, constipation, diverticulosis, even colon cancer were rare before the 19th century, and are still rare in developing countries; they only became common with the rise of sitting toilets. More at this link: https://www.naturesplatform.com/health_benefits.html

>>23118 >Humans are supposed to squat to take a shit, not sit down >Many conditions such as appendicitis, constipation, diverticulosis, even colon cancer were rare before the 19th century Were Indians right about the toilet witches? Was street-shitting the dharmic choice all along?

>>23121 >ever doubting their wisdom Yikes! Wait until you learn how hard the Jews shill against Ayurveda too Because it works

>Religious spergy Ebin, why not just have a theological debate on every thread at this point. >>23115 >This accusation needs to be a bannable offense in the absence of positive evidence. <Let's ban anons, because I don't like thing How about you just call him stupid for making claims without evidence? >>23116 >Mind telling me more? Not that anon, but Jesuits are just extremely zealous Catholics who were almost totally submissive towards the Papal states and were assigned tasks dealing with theology and arts. Once they became an enemy of the pope they became an enemy to all Catholic religious orders and organizations. The pantheism, naturalism, deism of the freemasons who was something that would of gotten them the Cathar treatment and likely the Jesuits attempted to revert masons back to Catholicism and rid of it do to it being increasingly if not just outright Aryan...ish. Albert Pike sets an example.

>>23128 >Once they I meant *Once you've*

>>23128 I know about the Jesuits, I was interested in the accounts of them doing false-flags to make their opponents look bad and justify whatever they wanted to do with them.

>>23124 >Ayurveda Redpill me more about this, kikepedia kveches about its heavy metal poisoning or something like that.

Would anyone happen to know anything about the Waffen SS mapping the Paris Catacombs during the occupation of France?

Suicide in Trans-Identifying Youth https://segm.org/trans_youth_suicide_study https://archive.md/bVZjO discussion: https://twitter.com/SEGMtweets/status/1485025705184591873 >The new study by Dr Biggs uses the data from the world's largest paediatric gender clinic, the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), to estimate the rates of completed suicides among trans-identifying youth. >They found an annualized suicide rate of 13 per 100,000. >No difference between those wait-listed v. treated was detected. >To date, no studies have shown that transition reduces the risk of suicide long-term. >While higher than the rate found in the general population, the absolute risk of suicide is low. This, combined with the lack of evidence that hormone therapy & surgery reduce the risk of suicide, calls into question the “transition or suicide” narrative. >For the general population of comparable age (14 to 17 years), the rate was 2.7 per 100,000. Thus, gender dysphoric adolescents had a significantly higher rate of suicide, 5.5 times greater after adjusting for the clinic’s sex ratio. > Another recent study revealed that while trans-identifying adolescents' suicidality (including thoughts and behaviors, but excluding completed suicides) is only somewhat higher than in youth referred to mental health services for non-gender-related concerns. (The obvious inference is that gender dysphoria/trans-identifying is just another mental illness) The meme is "40% suicide" but that's inaccurate. While the tranny/disphoria suicide rate is low in absolute terms, it's still 5.5x higher than the comparable general population. The important thing is, there is no difference in the suicide rates of those "trans-identifying" adolescents who have not received any treatment and those given hormone therapy and gender re-assignment surgery. So they're mutilating children for no reason. Currently the pro-conversion activists are saying it's better to have a tranny daughter than a dead son, but this research destroys that argument; and anyway, no, it's better to have a dead son than a living jewish abomination. And if medicine, the media, education and psychology weren't in the grip of the jews, we would have much lower rates of "trans-identifying" people to begin with, and much better ways of helping the others.

>>23896 Sterilising the mentally ill is not a bad idea tbh I say let them chop their balls off and stitch up their front holes

>>23897 You don't even need to do that invasive of surgeries to sterilize these people. The Third Reich was doing minimally invasive procedures to sterilize hundreds of thousands back in the 30s and 40s already.

>>23897 The problem is they're like cancer, they'll keep on spreading their mental illness to unsuspecting victims if left unimpeded. That's how "liberals" reproduce, after all.

>>23897 >>23896 Physical means take forever, it would be better to convince them in scale to separate their self from the population and form tranny communions in the philippines for safety that place is filled with trannies, and subhumans already and its a shithole no one goes too except to dump their trash anyway or cumdump. Nothing good has ever come from the shit heap of philippines.

https://archive.md/RtzPU Quite the document.

Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Sites Have Polluted Almost All Rivers Of The World - Major UK Study' According to recent study, pharmaceutical contamination of the world’s rivers is significantly more widespread than previously assumed, and now constitutes a worldwide hazard to environmental and human health. A group of experts from York University in the United Kingdom collected over 1,000 water samples from 258 rivers in 104 nations and discovered that many of them had levels of therapeutic medications that were dangerously high. Only two rivers in Iceland and one near a community in Venezuela were fully untouched by pharmaceutical contamination because their residents do not utilise modern medication. Four different medications were discovered in Antarctica. The finding of antibiotics in rivers is especially worrying, according to the study team, since it encourages the development of drug-resistant bacteria. Pharmaceuticals in our waterways endanger not just human health but also the environment. Other medications, such as contraceptives, can hinder fish from breeding and increase their susceptibility, resulting in less fish for humans to consume, according to the York study. The York team identified hospital waste, water-treatment facilities, septic tanks, and pharmaceutical manufacturing sites as the primary contributors of drug contamination in rivers, in addition to raw sewage discharge. The study: https://www.pnas.org/content/119/8/e2113947119 Articles: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/14/drugs-have-dangerously-polluted-the-worlds-rivers-scientists-warn https://archive.is/HCihr https://greatgameindia.com/pharmaceuticals-polluted-world-rivers/ https://archive.is/01kz8

>>24940 The sheer irony of the worst scum imaginable telling you that you need to eat bugs to save le climate Gentlemen ... I present you ... the kike.

>>24983 Exactly. They are the ones who are ruining the planet and mass-hypnotizing the population to buy their useless cheap kike goods. They create the problem, and refuse to fix it, and then tell us that we need to eat bugs, live in the pod, eat the Israeli lab meat and drink the poop water because they've ruined every other waterway on earth with pharmaceuticals, sewage, xenoestrogens and fluoride. Chutzpah to the highest extent possible.

>>23984 https://archive.is/Qw5jv Something similar.

>>24996 yes, and they eat filet mignon and travel by yacht and private jet, all while giving us sanctimonious lectures. >>25117 good info here, but the stuff about rape and laser blinding is too dishonorable for me.

For all the retards who listen to Adam Green's tinfoil hat that Hitler was a Zionist, despite the fact he was treated as a genuine threat to Judaism by Zion. Some of you forget that Hitler had supported and allowed National Socialist secret and esoteric socieites to use "magic" to fight against international Jewry. Anyone who says he was a Zionist is a fed or worse a Q-anon-like civic nationalist. https://carolynyeager.net/fake-legends-adolf-hitler%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Cjewish-grandfather%E2%80%9D https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/03/no-the-rothschilds-and-jewish-bankers-did-not-finance-hitler/ https://codoh.com/library/document/the-myth-of-the-big-business-nazi-axis/en/

>>25564 Hitler being a Zionist is refuted by Mein Kampf alone, it's such a silly argument. The Haavara Agreement and the Third Reich's strategic support of Zionist groups within Germany was pure realpolitik that he used to get Jews to leave Germany. He certainly did not support Israel becoming an independent state. If one is controlled by Jews internally, the first and most important thing to do is to kick them out of one's nation. If the Third Reich had won the war, Israel would have never become a thing.

>>23069 >If you read on, you will learn that it is actually Satan and his Demons that the Jews are cursing and blaspheming, and not the Nazarene. This may be way over many heads, but misconceptions about the Talmud's alleged "hatred" of Christ and Christianity must be addressed. >In the Al-Jilwah, Satan says: "Do not give them [Jews, Christians, Muslims] your books, lest they alter them without your knowledge. Learn by heart the greater part of them, lest they be altered." - Satan >Satan is the God of the Gentiles, and if his own people would take heed to what he has told us, and what he still tells us when he communicates with us, the Jews would have already been eradicated.

>>25611 Also, I noticed the autistic crackheads who created that webpage are the same ones who created this other website - http://thirdsexthulesociety.weebly.com/portugues.html -, since they linked it on their main page - https://www.satanslibrary.org/Multilingual/Portuguese666.html -.

>>25611 >On the Talmud Yehoshua was never referred to as "Christ" (Chosen by God) within the Talmud. Jews would never call the very man they consider to be a fraud and a false messiah, "divine". They even claimed that he had sex with animals and was born of a whore, so why would he considered to be messiah? I do have to agree with this as it seems that the text of Shabbat 116a makes no sense. Jews would never refer to those they reject as "Christ". >Al-Jilwah I don't know what me means by this, but I'm guessing it's just some book he made up or something as Satan was just a collection of Sun Gods fused into One as an allegory of why Jews view Judaism as superior over Gentiles. >Satan is the God of the Gentiles Satanic nonsense, but half-true, but as I said above, Satan was just a representation of the Gods of non-Jews.

>>25621 >Satan was just a representation of the Gods of non-Jews. The Biblical picture is actually a lot more complex and interesting. After the tower of Babel, God is said to have put angelic guardians over the nations of the earth. This is what is said in Deuteronomy 32:8 in the LXX - "He set the bounds of the peoples according to the number of the angels of God". We can see in other books of the Bible, such as Daniel, that the angel appointed to Israel, Michael, is actually struggling in the spiritual realm against 'the prince of Persia' and 'the prince of Greece', which are interpreted as being spiritual beings ruling over different nations. I believe I have watched a discussion by some Orthodox priests somewhere once that talked about the angels of the nations going astray from their roles and accepting worship from the people they were supposed to teach. We have another precedent with the Watchers in the pre-flood times. Satan seems to be completely different from these national angelic guardians, in that he is just some sort of fallen angel who goes around on the earth and under heaven and is powerless to act unless permitted by God (as we see in the Book of Job).

>>25779 Plato mentions something similar about the nations being parceled out to gods in two of his works. Laws and Critias, if I remember correctly. Probably referring to real events, as with most of these things that are mirrored multiple times cross-culturally such as the flood.

>>25779 Anon...the bible is retarded and consist of lies. You cannot take it seriously on everything it says. The bible appropriates the Gods as angels, which they clearly aren't. Then it places the ones or at-least their characteristics as Satanic that rejects Yahweh/Israel as the center of the world. This isn't complex. Fallen angels is another word for those who reject the Jews.

>>25921 Fallen angels is just the Biblical interpretation of how demigods came about (what the Bible calls Nephilim) and stuff such as how Zeus and other gods had children with human women.

>>25923 >Fallen angels is just the Biblical interpretation of how demigods came about Fallen angels are gods who spiritually and symbolically reject (((Yahweh))). I don't think you realize this interpretation was done to establish the volcano demon's fake supremacy as a way to get pagans to convert or make kikes believe they're superior n shiet. All who oppose the Jewish God are considered "fallen" as the bible declares that all creations are of (((him))), see Lucifer as example who is likely Venus or some sun g(G)od. Whether Zeus is fallen is up to personal thoughts or what a ecclesiastical state announces, but some Christcucks will still try to claim he was an Israelite as they do with Odin as a way to acknowledge their ancestors, while belittling them and continuing the established lie of the supremacy of the Israelites at the same time. All interpretations of the Gods are subjective and up to the reformed Jews who call themselves Christian.

Been researching transhumanism recently: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2022/04/04/who-coined-the-term-transhumanism-julian-huxley-or-pierre-teilhard-de-chardin/