>>26522
>Any unbiased look
Am I supposed to take this seriously? jewpedia, which is the same source that will hold tight to muh 6 millions, is the same source that uses a graphic that uses the smallest casualties figure possible for Holodomor. The difference? The first is the Holocaust, of which the Jews are the fabled victims, the other is Holodomor, which the Jews organized. In other words, with a more realistic figure, the dip would have been much bigger. Also, this graphic shows that Ukraine's population got reduced by ten million, not tens of millions, over the span of 18 years.
One obvious cause alluded to in the graph just below is falling fertility rates. If anything, it's useful to see what happens in a White-only country (roughly speaking) that has not benefited from cultural enrichment, when these rates do come close to 2 and then sharply drop below 2.
Is this genocide? By all means it's the same type of genocide that's going on everywhere else in the Western world. So what happened at the beginning of the 90s? Independence happened and Ukraine opened itself to the West. And then the country got so badly managed that it fell towards being some third world shit hole in less than ten years. A drop so catastrophic that there is no chance it wasn't done on purpose, especially as the conclusion was that Ukraine lost its nuclear weapon stockpile. In other words, a cucked country that had recently "freed" itself from the clutches of the dead Soviet system, threw to the dustbin more than a thousand nukes (I think, the number was crazy tbh) and all industrial technology related to military production: another White country rendered impotent.
That's it, since the 90s the country has been unable to rise despite its vast resources and is perhaps the main provider of White meatbags.
What communism could achieve in one year, it simply takes one decade to achieve through capitalism.
>The USA was breeding niggers in the Philippines as early as in the 1900s.
If you want to go there, you could say that the USA failed to move its niggers to Liberia after Lincoln's murder, who was a turncoat who adapted his speech to his audience, and was a gud goy who got removed once he wasn't useful. Jews, a well known family of bankers, were found to be funding both sides of the Civil War. They had no plan to remove the niggers. They set them free and the niggers did what they always do, rape and plunder. This is why the Klan was formed initially, to fight against the negro mobs.
>Not in an age of nationalisms where ethnic identity is strong and economically supported by centralised states.
This is gibberish and we may not agree but I'm saying what I would do. To hell with muh identity. I'd force you to uphold the defense of the White race at any cost and make sure to brainwash your kids to be pro-White and anti-Jew. There would, of course, remain enough room to be proud of your own culture and sub-race group.
>Why do you excuse Hitler's plans of world domination
First, he had no such plans.
Second, there would be worst conditions than living under an Aryan world wide empire.
Unless you were a faggot, a mutt, a traitor, a commie or a kike.
Third, are we going to pretend that Jews don't have a plan for world domination?
>but then deny it to the French and the English?
When did these two countries show any plan of dominating the world during the 20th century?
>Isn't war the natural state of man to any Hitlerian?
Perhaps, but you operate according to strawman arguments and Jewish memes so how do you expect me to give you a satisfying answer?
>Because blaming the Jews for everything is the pinnacle of intelligence?
Where do you think you are exactly?
>Nationalism is at the core of the Ukrainian conflict, too.
Exactly how it was used for WWI and II.
>Unless you try to make some kind of a super-identity, like a pan-European racism à la Christendom.
The Christian world has never been about a "pan-European racism".
>Did the Jews control America in 1898 when the US conquered the Philippines only to breed its indigenous population to absurd levels?
Considering how it was born and what it did with its niggers and Jews, if it wasn't openly controlled by Jews, they obviously were not far behind (the curtains). Some of the founding fathers had some racist opinions, but nearly all of them were Freemasons iirc and we know what this entails, that a significant amount of them would already be cucking for esoteric Judaism (that's 2deep4u goy).
>Did the Jews cause the Americans to kill one another in the 1860s Civil War to free their local niggers, too?
Lemme see. Using the official pre-cultural marxist narrative, you had White cucked Christians led by Masonic leaders on both sides, with one side fighting to free niggers from their oppressors, with the other side importing niggers bought from hand-rubbing merchants. Sounds familiar?