Not willing to delve into the Chinese-jewish rabbit hole. I'm sure others will be willing to sperg out to no end regarding this general conception, as they have done in other threads.
But I'll make a few points, for anyone interested.
>All of these groups are descended from Semites
Ok, if you want to use the word "Semite", you really ought to define it thoroughly, to avoid certain unfortunate conclusions. A modern day Egyptian could become very puzzled indeed when you start going off about "Semites".
So, is a Semite simply someone who speaks a "Semitic language"? Alright, that's easy enough to define. Or are you trying to define it as some defined "racial group"?
That's where it completely falls apart, on all levels. First of all, like I said earlier, the modern "Semitic populations", are vastly different from the ancient ones, such as the Akkadians, Assyrians, etc, in many aspects, racial makeup being one of them.
Likewise, Semitic is first and foremost a fucking language group, trying to define it as a race in the first place is quite foolish, as it was adopted by many disparate peoples, all descending from different stocks, over the millennia.
Many people (not shocked if a few of you guys didn't even know this), would be surprised to learn that Arabs are "Semites", meaning the populations of modern Iraq, Syria, and obviously Saudi Arabia, etc, are all derivations of an Arab-dominant version of Semitic people. People actually think that those pale curly haired rabbis are what "Semites" look like, it's simply laughable.