/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

[Post a Reply]
[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply
Säge:
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.

08/28/20 Come and join our Matrix/IRC servers, the info can be found here.
[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(259.88 KB 728x937 german cringe collection.jpg)
Unpopular Opinions Thread Blackshirt 04/17/2021 (Sat) 15:46:54 No. 2775
What would /fascist/ be without this thread? Post 'em
All these are just for retards to confess their guilt about jacking off to little japanese girls or liking Marx or something. These threads just excuse faggot behavior and give them safe spaces.
>>2777 > These threads just excuse faggot behavior and give them safe spaces. Exactly the opposite. This is the thread where they are BTFO and their flaws exposed.
(678.14 KB 540x960 feminism.mp4)
(69.19 KB 960x518 Feminist quotes.png)
(1004.81 KB 432x696 Face1.jpg)
(998.29 KB 432x696 Life16Week.jpg)
(783.73 KB 2175x1958 BASTARD GENERATION.jpg)
The Age of Consent should be abolished. The AOC is the founding principle of feminism because instead of girls marrying young, they are free to become whores and be promiscuous. Feminism is partly or wholly responsible for Birth control, Abortions, Getting their tubes tied, LGBT, Prostitution, Porn industry, Adultery, Useless leeching single mothers, Forcing circumcision on male children, Dating apps, Alimony and divorce culture and law, Women taking men’s jobs, Driving down wages by working and competing with men, Wasting their most fertile years working, Deciding to live independently, Self hating women not having children simply because they would be White, The spread of sexual diseases, Other female medication damaging and polluting the environment as well as public water, The rise of false rape accusations, Women choosing to become obese, Welfare state, Infidelity destroying families and children's minds and futures, Getting away with hitting or abusing men because White knights will always protect her, Leeching off beta orbiters, Cuckolding, Gold diggers, Marital rape cases, Gender studies, #metoo, #mybodymychoice, #slutpride, Settling down at 30+, Hedonism, Fat acceptance, Raising the age of consent because they can't compete with younger females, Plastic surgery, Makeup, Smoking drinking eating unhealthy during pregnancy among other things. ERASE FEMINISM STUMP AND STEM
>>2784 >The Age of Consent should be abolished. The AOC is the founding principle of feminism because instead of girls marrying young, they are free to become whores and be promiscuous. Feminism is partly or wholly responsible for Birth control, Abortions, Getting their tubes tied, LGBT, Prostitution, Porn industry, Adultery, Useless leeching single mothers, Forcing circumcision on male children, Dating apps, Alimony and divorce culture and law, Women taking men’s jobs, Driving down wages by working and competing with men, Wasting their most fertile years working, Deciding to live independently, Self hating women not having children simply because they would be White, The spread of sexual diseases, Other female medication damaging and polluting the environment as well as public water, The rise of false rape accusations, Women choosing to become obese, Welfare state, Infidelity destroying families and children's minds and futures, Getting away with hitting or abusing men because White knights will always protect her, Leeching off beta orbiters, Cuckolding, Gold diggers, Marital rape cases, Gender studies, #metoo, #mybodymychoice, #slutpride, Settling down at 30+, Hedonism, Fat acceptance, Raising the age of consent because they can't compete with younger females, Plastic surgery, Makeup, Smoking drinking eating unhealthy during pregnancy among other things. ERASE FEMINISM STUMP AND STEM Age of Consent existed to protect children from going into lifelong relationships without the maturity or knowledge as to the consequences. Trying to tie it into feminism is disingenuous to say the least.
(1.39 MB 1109x644 freaks of nature 1.PNG)
>>2784 >that video You can see the degeneracy literally reshaping her face in each picture, slowly. Her eyes also become deader and deader. It's always very sad to see this happen to women, because it's literally just purely them falling prey to manipulation and degeneracy due to the fact that males have been prevented by law, cultural pressure and feminism from actually protecting and having power over their women. Feminism is the greatest evil the jews have unleashed on us, plain and simple. They have taken the most fundamental form of hierarchy and division of labor in our society and set the two parts at war with each other. A house divided cannot stand. The modern concept of an age of consent is integral to this. It is in truth against Nature. Once a girl is fertile, Nature has designed her to be married and to have children, plain and simple. Faggots can disagree with this - but when Nature and human norms conflict, Nature triumphs every time.
>>2785 >protect children That's the exact same lingo the kikes use when they are feeding them homosexual anal sex lessons in school classes and when (((child protective services))) take away kids from White families because they've taught them pro-White values and ideas. While ages from ten to thirteen years were typically regarded as acceptable ages for sexual consent and marriage in all European nations and cultures from Antiquity to the mid-19th century, by the end of the 19th century, feminist organizations successfully campaigned for raising the age of consent. In 1875, the age of consent was raised to 13 in Great Britain and Ireland, ten years later, in 1885, the age of consent was raised to 16. Early feminists of the Social Purity movement, such as Josephine Butler and others, instrumental in securing the repeal of the Contagious Diseases Acts and were responsible for raising the age of consent. In the United States, as late as the 1880s most states set the minimum age of consent at ten to twelve (in Delaware, it was seven in 1895). In France, under the Napoleonic Code, the age of consent was set in 1832 at eleven, and was raised to thirteen in 1863. It was increased to fifteen in 1945. In Spain, it was set in 1822 at "puberty age", and changed to twelve in 1870, which was kept until 1999, when it became 13, and in 2015 it was raised to 16. Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" articles, feminists in the U.S. initiated their own campaign, which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least sixteen, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to eighteen. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to sixteen to eighteen years by 1920. In 1917, a bill raising the “Age of consent” in Great Britain and Ireland from 16 to 17 was defeated by only one vote. The higher age of consent marked a change in society where more women than before were diverted away from becoming married and having families in favor of being unmarried and childless. Before these feminist laws came into place, a man would financial security and be ready to marry. He would find a fertile young woman and start to court her. The parents would think the man is a fine suitor, and agree to the marriage. In this environment, a father could accurately assess the intentions of an older suitor for his daughter. If a 25-year-old woodsman asked for the farmer’s 14-year-old daughter’s hand in marriage, her father would know right away whether he was a good match. The father could then help his daughter make a smart decision rather than just tossing her to the wolves and hoping for the best. The man openly signaled to the parents of the girl that he was willing to feed their daughter until he dies and care for her children emotionally and financially. Marriage was more than a legal contract, it was binding for life. The man agreed to take love the woman for the rest of his life and vise-versa. When the girl was mature enough for sexual intercourse, pregnancy and childbirth followed. Children would be raised in a nuclear family with both parents. There was no element of exploitation involved. A girl who grew up in agrarian France in the Middle Ages knew her whole life that she would be married at 12-16 years old. The local village or town community would be aware of this marriage and support it. In the farming societies of pre-industrial Europe, children were a blessing, not a burden. The sooner a girl could start having children, the richer and happier the whole village would be. Once children were mature, they were almost free labor on the farm, and there was no social or economic penalty for girls who started early. Families had strong bonds and connection to community in these villages and towns. This was how civilization was for multiple millennia. >>2786 what the fuck have they done in that photo, that is straight out of a horror film.
(201.73 KB 582x527 age of consent pepe.png)
>>2785 >Age of Consent existed to protect children from going into lifelong relationships without the maturity or knowledge as to the consequences. Trying to tie it into feminism is disingenuous to say the least. You're thinking like a modern person, anon. In the pre-modern world female children weren't wandering around and flirting with boys and older males and then accidentally getting 'trapped' in a relationship with an older man. This was an affair between families. Families negotiated and one paired up their daughter with a suitable boy or slightly older man from the other family, and then they got married. People didn't get married for 'love' or other nebulous concepts, that is something that was cultivated and grown into over time. On top of all of this, with marriage being a family affair the best overall marriage partner is sought, both with the interests of the families in mind, and in the interest of the girl to be married as well. This is in stark contrast to modern degenerate relationship-formation, where girls are permitted (and encouraged) to run around and mingle with boys and men, regardless of race, and have sex with them, to be impregnated by them, and taken advantage of by them. Dating is extremely degenerate when viewed from the perspective of pre-modern social norms anywhere in the world. Children were already protected by their families, the feminist / Christian state came in and tried to codify anti-natural norms into law, which still exist today. Arranged marriages in the hands of families would be far healthier for society.
(111.35 KB 665x608 working mothers.jpg)
(785.41 KB 1564x1564 depressed women.jpg)
(48.11 KB 720x720 30 yo roastie.jpg)
(277.11 KB 1124x728 men at work women at work.jpg)
(937.80 KB 1740x1668 Jew_Contraception_Immigration.png)
For the majority of women, they only truly have respect for men that they originally formed an emotional relationship with when they were younger. As they grow older (without a husband), their ability to form attachment with men wears off and they lose the ability to truly respect a man ever again other than on a primal level of temporary lust. This paternal respect, in which the woman follows the man as opposed to falsely viewing herself as his equal is a key element in proper romance between men and women which is why our ancestors married young women. It was simply obvious to them. They knew that leaving women to sit until they turned ages like 18 simply made them spoiled and bitter. Almost all truly successful relationships are formed when the girl is still young, and because she bonded to a man in a crucial part of her development, she is attached to her partner in a way that she could never be in a relationship formed later in life. The age of peak fertility for women is 13-14 years old. It natural for girls who have reached puberty to engage in sexual intercourse. It is simply a fact of biology. In civilized society, this would happen only in a married relationship, where both the man and woman are spiritually bound for life. This formed life long relationships. All great civilizations knew this. The age of consent set in law is an aberration and one of the primary causes of the breakdown of modern relationships and declining birthrates. The age of consent prevents proper attachments from developing in youth and instead encourages a life of promiscuity. The primary goal of a woman in life is to find one man and devote the entirety of her feminine resources to him (affection, loyalty, sex, child-rearing, housekeeping) to support his masculine endeavors throughout his life. This is the way humans meant to live, and any other relationship arrangement is inferior. Waiting until age 16 or 18 gives her no stable male romantic influence to lead her through puberty and into adulthood which allows all sorts of decadent influences to crawl into her life and leads her astray into a life of promiscuity. When two people have sex and reach orgasm, they produce huge amounts of oxytocin in a neurochemical reaction which bonds them together. When a woman has multiple sexual partners in her life. Sex becomes devalued and no longer forms that attachment. Instead of lovemaking, it is merely fulfilling carnal desire. This process in which a woman has multiple sexual partners has an irreversible effect on her ability to form emotional attachment. She is no longer capable of true love in a traditional monogamous relationship.
>>2787 >what the fuck have they done in that photo, that is straight out of a horror film. They were indoctrinated into the tranny cult, unfortunately. This is the ultimate conclusion of feminism, since feminism attempts to turn women into poor imitation males, and when I say that, I mean of the worst aspects of men, not the best. Their beauty is destroyed, their ability to bear children is ruined, and they are turned into freaks of nature. It is tragic.
(2.95 MB 1200x1835 current communist goals.png)
>>2788 That marriage AoC stuff is such a farce! Feminists think kids are mature enough to transgender at age 10, even when their father is against it. In some cases they've even had the kid forcibly taken away from him because he opposed the globalhomo. And it's not just cases of transgenderism. In Sweden they've had cases where the state removed kids from their father because he attempted to keep them away from immigrants who wanted to have sex with them. So the feminists are fine with kids fucking, so long as it's not who the father approves of! But that just means the feminist *tool* is working as it was designed to. It's purpose was to weaken the family unit, one step of many in the communist agenda. They are just useful idiots that can't be reasoned with, as Yuri Bezmenov explains in great detail.
>>2789 >The age of peak fertility for women is 13-14 years old >Source: Trust me bro False The average age of a girls FIRST menstruation is 12(US) - 13(UK) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12671122 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3001737 http://vstudentworld.yolasite.com/resources/final_yr/gynae_obs/Hamilton%20Fairley%20Obstetrics%20and%20Gynaecology%20Lecture%20Notes%202%20Ed.pdf Girls in their first and second year of menstruation are about as fertile as a 35 year old >80% of the cycles are anovulatory in the first year after menarche, 50% in the third and 10% in the sixth year. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6249519 Anovulation is when the ovaries do not release an oocyte(egg) during a menstrual cycle Girls PEAK fertility is at 19-27 After 27 there is a very slight decrease, and noticeable decrease in a woman's 30's >The cumulative success rates after 12 cycles of insemination were 73% for women under age 25, 74% in women aged 26-30, 61% for ages 31-35, and 54% in the over 35 age group. https://web.archive.org/web/20020819203900/http://www.dcmsonline.org/jax-medicine/2000journals/may2000/ageinf.htm# The only source saying there is any decrease at all from 20-25 is based on fertility "survey" done in in the 1700's in France. It merely noted the rate of pregnancies (not actual fertility) and of course younger couples got pregnant more, because they HAVE MORE SEX.
(161.15 KB 252x407 ClipboardImage.png)
>>2795 > It's purpose was to weaken the family unit, one step of many in the communist agenda. Yes, exactly. For great insight into the agenda to destroy the nuclear family, I encourage anons to pick up this book. Kollontai was of course a Bolshevik and a Feminist at the beginning of the USSR. In the excerpts provided she talks about how the burden of rearing children should and must be removed from the 'archaic' nuclear family and transferred over completely to state institutions. Part of the reason for this is of course to (((liberate))) the woman from the "burdens" of domestic labor and child-rearing. She says that this will allow for true "free love" to come about. All of this have progressively been coming true over the course of the 20th century, of course. Public schools are a state institution of this kind, as are day cares. The prevention by the state in the 20th century of many forms of domestic discipline is another issue that goes under-addressed as well. In some European countries you cannot even spank your child anymore without risking them being taken away. I think that literally beating children is inexcusable, but giving them a spanking when they deserve it may in some cases be warranted. Having control over your children and their upbringing is feared by the jews >>2797 >73% for women under age 25, 74% in women aged 26-30 Kek this shit is literally within the margin of error - a 1% difference? >a very slight decrease You mean an over 10% drop?
(66.60 KB 1130x486 ClipboardImage.png)
>>2801 >a very slight decrease >You mean an over 10% drop? "After 27 very slight" as in one source I read said 27, but source I cited showed increase from 73% to 74% in fertility from under 25 compared to 26-30. But the 13% drop shown at 31-35 I think it is safe to say after 27 there would just be a slight decrease perhaps 2-3% then another 3-4% at 29 and so on Of course they are just averages, and there are many other contributing factors, but my point stands. There is no data supporting the claim the 13 year olds are at peak fertility, just the opposite. Pic is from http://mcb.berkeley.edu/courses/mcb135k/Discussion/261.pdf and again is simply showing "rates of pregnancies" not actual fertility, and of course 20 year old couples have more sex than 25 or 30 year old couples.
>>2806 Ah, okay I'm seeing what you are saying more. I don't know if I even myself would believe the claim that "13 is peak fertility". I don't think a 13 year old is a child either, but they are rapidly developing by that point. Even if one married a girl at that age, it might be best to wait a few years for pregnancy for her safety.
>>2795 Really makes you wonder about the witch burnings of yesteryear, did they burn the psychotic feminists of the time alive?
>>2813 Yes, the vast majority of witches burned or killed in the past deserved it, either because they were psychotic feminists, associating with demons or engaged in other anti-natural practices. It's also worth pointing out the jews and witches / sorcerers were closely linked in the medieval mind.
(50.67 KB 720x580 face to face.jpg)
Most pagans know nothing about what they believe in or anything about metaphysics/anthropology. Most christians know nothing about christ or have anything to show from learning under the many tellings of the modern biblical understanding. the religious issue is one of the most astroturfed and fake issues that plagues our communities to this day, all the while the solution being completely irrelevant and basic.
I don't support capitalism, consumerism nor do I want a society based on capital, but I do like some principles of the free-market or enterprise and think we should adopt it with National Socialist/Aryan characteristics. Things like schools, hospitals, etc are all controlled by the state, but men are still free to open their own business where there is heavy regulation and fair competition and the ban of monopolies.
>>2789 Actually, things need to go further than that. The term "consent" should be abolished and not be discussed because it's a fiction and it's unnatural. >>2797 Nope. Pair bonding needs to happen as young as possible for females because of how they are and whoring around needs to be totally abolished. Women are the gatekeepers with the most limited fertility for sex and therefore it makes more sense to base all regulation of sexuality around them. What people happen to be doing in this degenerate age is of no consequence. And, obviously, all feminists and marxist scum need to be eradicated.
>>2814 >It's also worth pointing out the jews and witches / sorcerers were closely linked in the medieval mind. I've noticed a trend with European folklore that the "enemies" eerily resemble the jew. Like vampires, witches (for jewesses), demons, gargoyles, etc. Seems almost like they were created as cautionary tales to protect young Whites from the filth of the jew.
>>2815 >>2815 >Most pagans know nothing about what they believe in or anything about metaphysics/anthropology A large number of pagans, yes. However, I would argue that the pagans who are truly sincere understand much more than the average Christcuck who is educated in their religion. What paganism is truly missing right now is what was at the core of all authentic Aryan traditions, and that is gnosis / jñāna. The goal of Aryan spiritual practice is direct intuitive insight into the truth / ultimate reality. Until this is achieved, the pagan might as well be just parroting secondhand, slightly garbled approximations of truth. It must be experienced directly. "Faith" is not given the importance it is in the Abrahamic traditions. We know. True paganism will be rebooted when something like this happens again: >>2816. >the religious issue is one of the most astroturfed and fake issues that plagues our communities to this day, all the while the solution being completely irrelevant and basic. I'd say exactly the opposite. It's about a search into what is the highest, what is the ultimate nature of reality. These questions are absolutely vital. The power of religion sincerely-believed is unimaginable. Without concern for spiritual matters, the White race is continue to sink into a morass of materialism, hedonism and nihilism.
>>2820 >I don't support capitalism, consumerism nor do I want a society based on capital, but I do like some principles of the free-market or enterprise It doesn't make since /nigger/, free market and enterprise are the same thing and originate from the jew. Also you clearly do not believe that free market principles are valid if you acknowledge that they must be heavily regulated. Video games, films, anime, etc are all things that distract your mind from self-mastery.
>>2828 >It doesn't make since /nigger/, free market and enterprise are the same thing and originate from the jew. I'm not asking for free marketism I'm saying that things such as private property/family property and business should be something we allow, but we are to only sell and center business on things that benefit our Volk, instead of creating the typical consumerist.
(16.01 KB 1313x182 ClipboardImage.png)
(3.06 MB 1342x1226 hansel gretel jew.png)
>>2822 >The term "consent" should be abolished and not be discussed because it's a fiction and it's unnatural. Kek reminds me of a tangentially-related post I read on /lit/ once. Pic related. >>2823 Yeah, they're literally all modeled off of jews. See the second pic.
>>2832 >I'm not asking for free marketism I'm saying that things such as private property/family property and business should be something we allow, but we are to only sell and center business on things that benefit our Volk, instead of creating the typical consumerist. Any free market principals does not work with national socialism. What you're asking for isn't something that the NSDAP had already done in the get-go. Don't call it (((free market))), which is a jewish term and insult to National Socialism. It is true that there is no perfect economy, but any economy that leads to or empowers jewry should be destroyed not used.
>>2828 > free market and enterprise are the same thing and originate from the jew. What the fuck are you talking about? Enterprise has existed since the beginning of time. An absolute free market is what is kiked and bad for a nation and its Volk.
>>2834 >Rape does not exist So niggers rapping White women in America is merely sex and not women being abused huh?
>>2836 > Enterprise has existed since the beginning of time FREE ENTERPRISE is kiked you dumbass. I'm not saying enterprise alone. Learn to read or shut the fuck up.
>>2837 Talk about a lack of nuance, retard. The post is saying that rape being something that causes extreme trauma and ruins a woman's life is brainwashing, and historically rape was treated as a major crime not because of consent but because the chastity of a woman was something socially valued, and something that was to be protected by her male guardians. For it to be lost would damage her marital prospects or get her possibly pregnant with a child that was not hers. This isn't to say that forcibly having sex with random women is good or commendable, it's the exact opposite.
>>2834 >Talk about a lack of nuance, retard. The post is saying that rape being something that causes extreme trauma and ruins a woman's life is brainwashing, and historically rape was treated as a major crime not because of consent but because the chastity of a woman was something socially valued That still sounds retarded.
>>2843 It has an element of truth to it. I wouldn't take some stupid post I dug up on a /lit/ archive that seriously though. Redefining rape isn't high on my list of concerns.
Strasserites and Nazbols are reactionaries and should not be tolerated by any sane fascist
>>2797 This maybe anecdotal evidence but my sister-in-law's first menstruation was at age 10. >>2813 Yes, and as >>2814 said, they deserved it. >>2822 Based. If you wait until a woman is around thirty years old, she will never ever love you like teen love. Relationships later in life are more jaded, less committed and more likely to cheat. It loses all value. >>2835 Free Market is a jewish scam as you said. It's of the same ilk when they call tranny-tolerance, racemixing, and similar degeneracy "freedom" in the sense of freedom to do unlimited debauchery. Look at this degenerate faggot that has cropped up in this thread >>2870 I can only assume that he is some incel that has resorted or has been brainwashed into faggotry by ZOG propaganda. If families paired up teens together in arranged marriages where they start a family, then shit like this would not happen. Inceldom/Femceldom/men and women in their 30s with no kids/trannys and abortions would not exist if you abolished the age of consent and feminist cultural dictations that rip apart the fabric of the traditional family unit. Abortion alone is a crime against humanity of the most debased proportions, and it is directly propped up by feminist hags who want to be promiscuous instead of marrying and being wholesome.
(99.86 KB 765x1185 pornhub oy vey.jpg)
Be sure to look out for subversives in this thread. There was a post about "femboys" and one last night from some gay pedo. Unpopular opinions =/= "I am a degenerate, please tolerate me!" >>2872 >Look at this degenerate faggot that has cropped up in this thread >>2870 I can only assume that he is some incel that has resorted or has been brainwashed into faggotry by ZOG propaganda He was probably very pornsick. So many people are turned into faggots by a superabundance of increasingly degenerate porn consumption today. This is the real "pandemic" of the West that more people need to be talking about. Along with what you say, it needs to be totally banned. The average child accesses hardcore pornography today by the age of ten on average according to some studies. I can only image what damage this filth is doing to them. >>2866 Almost all of them are quite suspicious. In fact they are just leftists at the end of the day who pretend not to be for whatever reason. The idea of 'class war' is antithetical to Fascism / National Socialism. This of course does not mean that we tolerate what Capitalists are doing, since many of them are indeed traitors to their race and nation, but that we work to create a more harmonious national community. Class war is a tacit admission that hierarchy is illegitimate, and is often based off of slave morality / leftist sentiments.
>>2813 No they killed the last keepers of much of our ancestral Folklore, and in most cases they did not deserve it. >>2814 Not sure how you get that, except from being a moronic Christcuck. witches" was a false label applied to priestesses and herbalists and sometimes your local infertile spinster who had little to no choice except to become an herbalist to support herself, they were not demon traffickers unless you for some reason(YHWH WORSHIP) think our gods are demons, they were also far more in line with Nature than any Abrahamic will ever be. >>2815 Not a single christain I have ever met knows anything worth knowing about their religion, which is almost nothing, most claim to have read the bible but do not, and more than a third of those who have, only know the "based" out of context quotes, which are often worse or outright fucking laughable in context. >>2825 You have the flaws with "Paganism" right so far, but Gnosis is not as hard to achieve as many think, but once you have achieved it, it does show you how much is straight bullshit about what remains of what we know of our ancestors beliefs. few can achieve the state reliably, from what I have gathered and even fewer get the privilege of direct prolonged contact with the gods.
>>2841 Your argument is false historically, people were not allowed to "rape" within the tribe but what was then called rape and what is now called rape are two completely different things. The fact that women inherently seem to have "rape" fantasies in greater than a two-thirds ratio also betrays your lie here. Rape or forced sex to show dominance, is necessary to put women in their place and fulfill their inherent desire for domination, this is usually done by taking warbrides, the original definition of rape, which was KIDNAPPING.
>>2897 Don't shoot up your local school kid.
>>2882 >He was probably very pornsick. So many people are turned into faggots by a superabundance of increasingly degenerate porn consumption today. This is the real "pandemic" of the West that more people need to be talking about. very true. like any other drug, the user gets desensitized, and needs stronger hits to get high. eventually, normal porn doesn't cut it, and they delve into weird fetishes, trannies, or self-inserting as the female (a popular practice on cuck-chan's porn board, I've noticed). >Along with what you say, it needs to be totally banned. the problem is, porn would go underground onto the black market, where people would seek it out, and be exposed to the most degenerate material next to the vanilla. I remember back in my young teens being fascinated by porn/sex; if there had been barriers to access, I would've applied my intellect to getting around them. of course, back then I didn't know the dangers of being a coomer, and how porn can be a vampire on one's time & energy, not to mention long-term psychological damage. a total ban wouldn't work, but the status quo is not acceptable either. I think the solution is to shut down the industry and its major studios, while permitting softcore & amateur content. >The average child accesses hardcore pornography today by the age of ten on average according to some studies. I can only image what damage this filth is doing to them. I first started watching it around 13 years old. there's no way of knowing how much I've been affected by it over the years, but Im sure it's been significant.
>>2896 >Not sure how you get that, except from being a moronic Christcuck. This is the conclusion drawn from consulting the ancient Greek and Roman sources on the matter. In the Roman Empire repeatedly we can see the burning of magical books, banning of divination, the banning of degenerate sects like the Bacchic rites, interdictions against crop-charming and curses. Livy records that in the years 184 and 180 BCE some 5,000 people were executed for veneficia—i.e. sorcery, witchcraft In the Greek city state of Teos there are inscriptions that indicate that the making of spells and poisons was punishable by death of the one who did it and their entire family. Also in Greece we see the example of Theoris of Lemnos, a witch who was tried and put to death with her entire family either for the crime of asebeia / impiety or for casting incantations and using harmful drugs. Check out this book for a huge list of sources and quotes on this stuff: http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=3397A6C3906F111F27A16DED37E73B4E Witchs and sorcerers are simply no good. Just look at witches in Africa, they literally kidnap and kill children for their “medicine”. Look up “muti murders”. >witches" was a false label applied to priestesses and herbalists and sometimes your local infertile spinster who had little to no choice except to become an herbalist to support herself What you are calling witches are not the witches to be concerned with. I am focusing solely on adharmic / evil people.
>>2905 He’s not entirely wrong though. The term rape cames from Latin ‘rapere’ which refers to abduction, kidnapping, snatching off, etc. Roman itself was in truth founded on a mass “rape” of women. They didn’t have enough women in Rome, so they invited the neighboring tribes over and stole all of their virgins. Might is right
>>2897 >where people would seek it out, and be exposed to the most degenerate material next to the vanilla You mean like it already is? >>2942 All the women in that picture have a big build instead of being thin or dainty, was that more common in Ancient times?
>>2958 >All the women in that picture have a big build instead of being thin or dainty Some of it may just be the personal aesthetic tastes of the artists. It seems like most of these paintings of the event come from the 18th and 19th centuries, if not earlier, and many (not all) of the paintings from around then sometimes depict bigger women—not fat, obviously, just “fuller” bodies. Unfortunately Greek and Roman art isn’t much of a guide either, since their statues were depictions of ideals like perfect men and women. But even to make those statues there had to be references for them to draw off of. My guess is that they weren’t as bulky as those art pieces, but they weren’t skinny like supermodels the jews put in advertising and entertainment today.
>>2942 >Might is right No one on this board has that, again this board is nothing more, but a bunch lame ass edge-lords who can't get their heads out of the gutters, as they LARP as Dharmists.
>>2967 >he thinks might is right is some sort of individualistic idea You're exposing yourself as newfag here. Ragnar Redbeard was ultimately wrong, as was Callicles to an extent. Might is Right is an eternal Law of Nature, but it is not individualistic. To deny the right of might is to have your head in the clouds
>>2972 >You're exposing yourself as newfag here. No I ain't, I know what it is, it's just that you faggots not only make it sound lame, but I doubt anyone on here actually has enough braincells and isn't some scrawny nerd to make NatSoc mighty. >Might is Right is an eternal Law of Nature, but it is not individualistic. Declared by a bunch of LARPers, who don't understand the laws of nature themselves. Yeah no, go outside and stay off the internet for a while.
>>2975 Might is right is the truth, and no amount of crying on /fascist/ will change that. Even if this entire board was full of LARPers, might is right would remain true, since it is the only principle operative in the world around us. The might of the jews is what sets the right. You cannot deny this.
>>2932 Even if we ban it is true that it's going to exist and be watched to an extent. That of course should not stop us. No laws are full-proof. What is most important is keeping children from being exposed to hardcore porn at early age, and to make this stuff harder to find. Best ways to start doing that would be to ban the production, distribution and selling of pornographic material. The effort can't end here, though. Banning pornography alone isn't going to fix anything. We have to prevent the porn spiral itself. One way of doing that is getting people married earlier, as has already been discussed ITT, and to make sure young people have active, productive lives. The best defense against pornography is this. When you're out and about there's no time to get stuck in a mire of degeneracy. Any Fascist state of the future would necessarily institute something like the Hitlerjugend and the Reich Labor Service. I think all of this alone would constitute massive changes. I'm not worried about stopping people from masturbating, or if some dude jerks off to some girl in a bikini online occasionally, or even looks at something more risqué. As long as easy access is shut down and necessary steps offline are taken to stop the problem, we will be making great strides towards creating a healthier society.
>>2975 "LARP" is the easiest way to spot a shill since 2019, you aren't fooling anyone.
>>2982 It's really the perfect example of a meaningless buzzword in 99% of the cases it's used.
>>2967 What's your opinion of an ethnoplanet?
>>2896 >Gnosis is not as hard to achieve as many think, but once you have achieved it, it does show you how much is straight bullshit about what remains of what we know of our ancestors beliefs. few can achieve the state reliably, from what I have gathered and even fewer get the privilege of direct prolonged contact with the gods. Are you speaking from experience here? How long did it take?
>>2905 29 years old with a woman, but i'll be sure to take your advice.
>>2936 Most of those were long gone by the time of christianity acquired dominance, as I am sure you know, the Witches I described were largely innocent keepers of our folklore. it is a crime that should not be forgiven.
>>2989 Yes, I took to it very quickly and realized I had been getting messages and information from the gods my entire life. For most if you meditate daily you will receive information from your ancestors fairly frequently, and the gods very rarely, it takes devotion and dedication to achieve.
>>2996 Thanks for the insight concerning your experiences, anon. I really just need to consistently meditate.
>>2998 No problem, and worry not if you miss a day or two here or there, we all have days where we are too unsettled or busy to meditate, just do your best to get what you can in.
>>2958 (you responded to the wrong post) it is like that currently, but I think a porn black market would be even worse. >>2978 definitely. nothing exists in a vacuum, and the porn spiral is part of our modern lifestyle. in a better society, we wouldn't pursue instant gratification the way we do now. some resist the poison, others give into it, but none are unaffected. I know I'd be better if I'd grown up in a fascist state.
>>2825 >pagans who are truly sincere understand much more than the average Christcuck Obviously. A sincere Christian will also know more than the average pagan. I agree that that the spiritual is ultimately extremely important, but is secondary in the short term because enlightenment can't be reached in a degenerated society. Because of this, the religious disagreement is at this stage functionally irrelevant.
>>3130 >enlightenment can't be reached in a degenerated society I would argue that it is far more difficult, but not impossible. I don't think many people could work a wagecuck job and reach enlightenment though. The modern system is designed to keep working endlessly and not stopping to ponder the larger questions. >Because of this, the religious disagreement is at this stage functionally irrelevant. It depends. I believe the Christian problem is a major issue that we face as a race. They are the ones who are the problem. If they get in the way, there will have to be found a way for these people to be dealt with or neutralized in one way or another. The fact that they have so much sympathy among some is a great problem. The Christian worldview and the Aryan worldview are like fire and water or light and dark.
>>3132 >I believe the Christian problem is a major issue that we face as a race Why? Christianity got beat out by globohomo as the main religion by WWII at the latest. Prior to that, there were many parallels between Pagan and Christian practice. This is natural, because the people were the same. A healthy White populace in control of their own destiny will more or less fall naturally into their proper alignment, given enough time.
>>3138 Christianity is more of an internal obstacle than a main enemy that we face. Main enemies are of course Cultural Marxists, Zionists, jews, Freemasons, etc. The message of the Bible is ultimately harmful for the existence of our race. I say this because the morality of Christianity is fundamentally universalist slave morality - in essence, proto-leftism. The fact that they do worship a jew as God incarnate and the rest of their people in some sense 'chosen' are also major issues. A good subset of Christians support mass-immigration, dysgenics and anti-racism. The real problem is that it's all right in the Bible too. And yes, the majority of them are Protestants. Their alien desert religion is ultimately false. If some Christians can work to destroy Globohomo I will not complain. I feel as if their very worldview is set against them fully awakening though.
>>3142 >A good subset of Christians support mass-immigration, dysgenics and anti-racism Only because they currently take marching orders from globohomo. >The real problem is that it's all right in the Bible too People have a tendency to twist dogma to fit their purposes, especially if they have an agenda. "Pagans" also try to use stories of Loki shapeshifting to justify transgenderism. Ultimately, we have 1000+ years of White Christianity, and in my limited knowledge of history I don't see proto-leftism ever manifesting in any meaningful ways.
>>3152 >"Pagans" also try to use stories of Loki shapeshifting to justify transgenderism. It’s a completely different situation. In one case we have a particular god doing some action in a myth, and in the case of Christianity we have multiple, multiple verses which attest to the fact that the jews are chosen, that you shouldn’t resist evil, that you should be meek, turn the other cheek, that you should love your enemies and that you shouldn’t plan for the future. It’s designed to turn you into a doormat — and it’s directly from the mouth of Jesus, from God, himself. Likewise we have verses from Paul, who was allegedly appointed “Apostle to the Gentiles” by Jesus himself, saying things like the weak, stupid and meek are favored by God to shame the strong, intelligent and powerful. It’s pure slave morality, and there are no other alternate interpretations here. I can provide textual references for each and every single claim I have made in this post, and will provide them if needed. >I don't see proto-leftism ever manifesting in any meaningful ways. We can easily point out sudden periods where proto-communist movements literally cropped up with Christian roots in Europe and elsewhere such as Diggers, Thomas Müntzer’s Anabaptist rebellion, Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, etc. Proto-leftist thought has been permeating our society for nearly two millennia now and has gradually shaped the minds of Europeans from repeated intergenerational brainwashing. The pagan schema of good = beautiful = favored by God has been overturned, and eventually mutated into Protestantism, which mutated further into various forms of leftism which mingled with jew-made Marxism and atheism, which all retain a highly Abrahamic outlook on reality with their linear / progressive views of time, violent fanaticism and slave morality (i.e. always siding with the weak, degenerating and “oppressed”). Anything good that happened in Europe for the last two thousand years or so except for in the domain of art and architecture was almost solely in spite of Christianity, not because of it. The entire reason we are rapidly degenerating now is ultimately due to Abrahamism, specifically Christianity, and various forms of mutant post-Christian ‘religions’ which are Abrahamic in character like modern atheism / secular humanism / liberalism. All of this of course goes back to the eternal jew.
>>3154 Amazing breakdown.
>>3154 > I can provide textual references for each and every single claim I have made in this post, and will provide them if needed. Please provide as many references and bible quotes as you can for an essay I'm wiritng. >except for in the domain of art and architecture All the cathedrals in Europe were built using architectural technology that was bequeathed to them by the romans.
Last post here >>3154 was from me, same as from >>3142 and >>3132. Should show I'm on Tor again. >>3160 Thank you anon. >>3161 I'll provide a couple that might help you out a bit. For the favored status of the weak and foolish over the naturally strong, intelligent and proud see 1 Corinthians 1:27-29: <But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. <God chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things--and the things that are not--to nullify the things that are, <so that no one may boast before him. That you should hate your family and that Jesus brought a metaphorical sword to divide communities with his teachings (or even if that was not his mission, he knew that his teachings would bring this about). See Matthew 10;34-38: <"Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. <For I have come to turn "'a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law-- <a man's enemies will be the members of his own household.' <"Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. <Whoever does not take up their cross and follow me is not worthy of me. A lot of the things I mentioned are from The Sermon on the Mount, i.e. Matthew 5, 6, 7. That is worth reading in whole. Some more quotes and similar critique can be found in the image I have attached that I wrote up back on Anon Cafe. Though some of it are my own conclusions and twists on things, if you want a really good overview of some of the stuff I've said (in-depth that is), check out the following books >Antichrist by Nietzsche >Twilight of the Idols by Nietzsche >On Being a Pagan by Alain de Benoist
Would you say that X religion is corrupted only if shitskins were partaking it or can "kikes invented it" have to be the kick?
>>3189 A religion is corrupted when it begins to deviate from Truth and the Laws of Nature. All else is just secondary. Christianity isn't bad solely because jews invented it (not to say that isn't a contributing factor, obviously), but mainly because it is a form of suicidal slave morality that has been dulling the instincts of White people for the last two millennia. On top of this, Christianity is quite evidently a false religion for a host of other reasons that have nothing to do with kikes.
Ethnoglobe posters are childish, retarded and low-quality posters. Their posts contribute nothing of value to this board and they think that saying "lol just kill everyone!" is the solution to every problem, ignoring the fact that things are never just that simple, and that we are not operating completely within a vacuum. They are a joke and should go back to /pol/ or fuck off to Neinchan.
>>3233 Good luck with the replies you may get.
>>3233 You're completely correct and I dare anyone to say otherwise. It has nothing to do with wanting ethnoglobe or not, and has everything to do with there being nothing to discuss about it because it's a fucking pipe dream. They're all soft faggots anyway for not fantasizing about ethnogalaxies instead.
>>3247 >not ethnomultiverse Get a load of this niggerlover!
>>3247 I'm sure I'll get a few posts saying that I love non-Whites merely for not wanting to fantasize about far-fetched and tired ideas that really aren't conducive of any interesting discussion. With your funny remark about ethnogalaxies, it makes me think that it really is equivalent in some ways to other far-fetched and as-of-now inconsequential ideas like Star Trek fantasies and the like. Pro-Whites don't even control a single damn country, yet retards here have to disrupt every single thread with talk of how we're going to 90% of the planet
>>3233 It is a solution, even if you don't like it. It may not be the only solution, but it's never not a solution. Whether it can actually work or not is another question entirely.
>>3250 >thinking other universes would even exist after we press the magical Ethnoglobe button enough times You're a glownigger, even though I don't know what glownigger means in context! Do I fit in yet? >>3251 >Pro-Whites don't even control a single damn country, yet retards here have to disrupt every single thread with talk of how we're going to 90% of the planet >disrupt Bingo, they should be labeled disruptors and jettisoned into the ethnoether.
>>3253 They *are* disrupters.
>>3253 >>3255 I hadn't thought about them being literal disrupters but it would be a good strategy from the perspective of someone who wishes to disrupt.
>>3256 It is colloquially referred to as purity spiraling or holiness spiraling. Our “religion” (ie shares philosophy/values/belief structure) is centered around White racial identity. It is easy to hijack through a form of “national socialist virtue signaling,” meaning I’m “more nazi than you” if I want ethnoglobe or if I push for immediate terrorism or call others opticscucks or christcucks. Basically arguing against any form of moderation or incremental change or small steps towards improvement. It is also effective at consensus cracking.
>>3258 Perhaps we might call them hypernazis although it is too appealing of a label (for “our side”).
>>3256 Furthermore, zoomers and those newest to “our side” are most susceptible to falling into this trap because they are younger and thus less prone to moderation and more eager to prove themselves.
>>3258 You're overthinking it. If a magic button could be pressed and all non-Whites and hebrews went *poof* then most problems would be solved, ergo ethnoglobe and at the end of the day it's exactly what they're trying to do to Europe except reversed on their own heads instead. The fact that many of its adherents are bellicose is another matter entirely, but I highly doubt it's an active attempt to "undermine" solutions, just chest beating.
>>3261 >overthinking it You’re a dipshit.
>>3261 >but I highly doubt it's an active attempt to "undermine" solutions Did you know that right after the Bowers shooting, Gab.ai banned all the triple digit IQ NatSocs without even a warning and left all the ethnoglobe-tier retard posters alone in order to help news sites form a narrative against their own site?
>>3266 Had no idea, never did use gab. But, I get the impression the grief against "ethnoglobe" seems to be more against its very loud proponents than the idea itself. Or is it against the idea itself? To me, that idea, while utterly outlandish at this specific point in time, is incredibly feasible for the enemy and something they are actively practicing with every "dreamer" they allow to inhabit foreign soil, as well as boosting them with all the help they can while doing so. That's why I don't rail against ethnoglobe. I will happily agree though that if any sort of solution is used exclusively as a club to beat another solution to death with no merits or feasibility of its own to speak of, then that wouldn't be helpful to anybody.
(1.70 MB 1204x789 ETHNOGLOBE.png)
>>3268 Completely against its loud proponents who: a) are sent to disrupt or provide a means to destroy the host board, or b) are useful idiots for the same ends, or c) dilute discussion of logistical and interllectual merit with "wow that would be so nice haha fucking kikes not letting us ethnoglobe" before employing divide and conquer with the huge crux issue "should Japan stay or should we kill them? lets talk about killing our Axis allies that are the topic of one of the most interesting and long running threads on the board my fellow fascists." Everyone knows the quote about jews wanting a world of their own, and they're not doing it through spamming 'ethnoglobe' everywhere, are they? Why should we? That aside, the earlier poster talking about Star Trek earlier reminded me, it literally is a Star Trek fantasy. Don't ask me how I know this, but in the first season of TNG the writers idea of a "paradise" planet is a bunch of scantily clad turboaryans running around, and being hilariously over the top about following the law, as Wesley Crusher, a guest and alien (played by a real life cuckold), is condemned to death for falling on some plants while playing frisbee. Yet in one of the last seasons, the new model of a "paradise planet" is a marxist shithole full of beaner houses and niggers. It's a great example of how Season 1 of anything is there to suck you in and by Season 5 they're licking children's armpits or something.
>>3233 >Their posts contribute nothing of value to this board and they think that saying "lol just kill everyone!" is the solution to every problem Thank you for not understanding ethno-globe your opinion is not only retarded, but you outsed yourself once again as the low quality shill who has too much on his time having ethno-globe anons rent free in his peanut brain.
>>3274 >rarely It was just used as a wedge to get /fascist/ kicked out of cafe you disingenuous fuckwit.
>>3278 >it was just used as a wedge to get /fascist/ kicked out of cafe you disingenuous fuckwit. >Literally crying for optics cucking
>>3279 Optics cucking would be railing against the Saint thread and you don't see any of that, do you? And that isn't nuanced enough for anyone to misunderstand, so there's a good reason for you to be posting from TOR, isn't there?
>>3276 mm. >and they're not doing it through spamming 'ethnoglobe' everywhere, are they? Not in those exact words of course, but every news article about "crazy White shooter this" and "White so and so doing so and so" with a microscope while ignoring Detroit experiencing multiple murders over a weekend is something I would consider to be "spamming ethnoglobe", except their version of course which is to rule over a mutt world with no resistance to speak of. >Why should we? It is fairly fruitless, because every fascist is already fully aware of whom his enemy is and what his intentions are to a lesser or greater degree. A more productive question is, how to shape public opinion, or how to take away the tools to shape public perception from the enemy? Honestly, I think all efforts should be focused to this one point, since accomplishment of this goal opens all sorts of doors on its own. Internet is a good start, since it manages to compete against their monopoly on information distribution. In that respect I'm very impressed, it seems like Whites have been doing this instinctually, and probably intentionally in some cases, since even a deeply conservative brother of mine was commenting on some "and, suddenly, for no reason at all, Hitler was voted into power" thing, which was something I never really thought would leave imageboards. He still rails against Hitler of course, but step by step, ultimately.
>>3280 >Optics cucking would be railing against the Saint thread and you don't see any of that, do you? What the fuck are you talking about, now you're scapegoating like a typical retard. Optics cucking is asking to say anything sensitive and demand like a bitch to controversial and radical changes, which is what you're asking like a dumbass coward. > And that isn't nuanced enough for anyone to misunderstand, so there's a good reason for you to be posting from TOR, isn't there? >Complaining about TOR Do you wanna know how I know you're new here? Also you can stop pretending to be two different people no one has been shilling ethnoglobe now stop retard.
>>3283 > no one has been shilling ethnoglobe I beg to differ. There is a very clear ethnoglobe shill who uses Tor and constantly concern-trolls about the idea that there could be non-Whites lurking in our midst
>>3282 It is completely fruitless, if you look at most of the posts it isn't used as >Ethnoglobe! Go out and do X today to bring it about! but as >Ethnoglobe is inevitable just sit there and wait! Q will save us! Operation Trust! It's just copium, as the kids would say. >A more productive question is, how to shape public opinion, or how to take away the tools to shape public perception from the enemy? Honestly, I think all efforts should be focused to this one point, since accomplishment of this goal opens all sorts of doors on its own. Totally agree, ever since the mass deplatforming we are pretty much fucked and no one wants to talk about it. >>3283 >Optics cucking is asking to say anything sensitive and demand like a bitch to controversial and radical changes Try typing that again without spilling your spaghetti. I stand corrected, maybe you are stupid enough to not understand the slightest nuance.
>>3279 Retard. Optics cucking has nothing to not proposing or objecting to outlandish and fantastical schemes that will in all honesty probably never even happen.
>>3286 Trying responding this without the (1). >3288 >Try typing that again without spilling your spaghetti. Have you tried not sounding any gay than you already are? >I stand corrected, maybe you are stupid enough to not understand the slightest nuance. No I stand corrected, you're going taking in three dicks in your mouth with your imaginary boyfriends here. >>3290 >Retard. Optics cucking has nothing to not proposing or objecting to outlandish and fantastical schemes It's not outlandish, fantastical nor a scheme to want to kill most niggers on Earth. You are indeed optics cucking and just proving my point dumbnuts. Please keep talking to yourself it's quite enjoying to watch literal embarrassment.
>>3286 You mean the shill is anti ethnoglobe, right?
>>3290 >Retard. Optics cucking has nothing to not proposing or objecting to outlandish and fantastical schemes that will in all honesty probably never even happen. How is ethnoglobe in any way or form a outlandish or fantastical scheme? Again with the shills. Fuck off and find another board will you suck your dick.
>>3292 >most niggers on Earth >most Explain.
>>3295 *Who*
>>3294 >No argument Keep sucking that dick. I'll wait when you finally finish commencing in pozz faggot. >>3296 Look up the word most.
>>3298 >How organic. I bet the guy with the Hitler flag is the exact same as the other pro-ethnoglobe Tor poster Genius you found me out Mr.100 IQ anon! You still haven't given me an answer, which is telling. Also you don't have the right to talk, considering this is a dead board and there's no way in hell three people crying about ethnoglobe are totally not the same shill.
>>3299 >look up the word most What I mean is that he didn't mean all niggers.
>>3300 It's simple, people are tired of low-quality ethnoglobe posters who have been shitting up this board for months now.
>>3301 >What I mean is that he didn't mean all niggers. Yeah I meant most as in niggers who are far away from Whites and can't fuck over the planet's environments. Not even Africa should belong to them.
>>3303 What people are you referring to? There's rarely been anyone on here posting about ethnoglobe. Most conversations have been centered on Aryans spirituality, Christcuckery, and the shit going on in Weimerica. I'm tried of seeing the same shills who samefag and constantly cry about shit that's been a non-issue since exodus. Also next time don't bitch about muh shills and TOR, while samefagging and using TOR to create an illusion as if there is totally more than one person here who agree with you. Both of you faggots are annoying and need to off yourselves.
>>3303 It's not low quality. It's just posts you can ignore, really. Now the thing is whether you agree that ethnoglobe should happen and support it. End of story.
>>3307 It is low-quality, because "lol just exterminate them all, it's totally gonna happen" is 4cuck-tier. This doesn't mean I have a moralfag objection to it or anything, but that it's just not conducive of any interesting discussion or posts. If one actually wants to help their race they need to be focused on thing that are more immediately relevant to the issues facing our people, not some pie in the sky genocide fantasy.
>>3311 Actually lets go one step farther, defend this >>2064 and every other anti-synarchist-anon and humorless anti-board-tan post while explaining to me why no one should read The West's Darkest Hour since it's written by a non-White, I'll wait.
>>3317 That post you link is the perfect example of what I was referring to originally here: >>3286
>>3278 What does it matter? The cafe was always going to kick us out and I don't consider it a loss, because they did it with no honor at all, if it really was about the content, they would have simply asked FashBO to clean up some of the posts and that would have been that, their intention had been to drive us off the site from the start, and the only reason we got it at all was because it was just going to be a backup, that they had no expectation we would use. >>3268 That never happened, unequivocally. I watched as Christkikes simply took over out of the sheer number of them made all Natsoc leave, gab did nothing or they would have been called out all over the place for their cuckery like happened with their removal of porn. >>3309 As he said Ignore the posts, they're shitposts most often, and yeah it's a bit pipe-dreamy but certainly an achievable goal and I have outlined several methods for accomplishing such in a reasonable manner on this board before you may be able to find the posts on Picochan, quit counter-signalling them, there's no point at all, and 16chan will have to be taken down for us to be removed from here, and if you actually have an issue with it and think it should be bannable BRING IT UP FASHBO IN THE META THREAD.
>>3317 Whats to defend about it? Cesar himself knows that if he gets his way he too will die for the Total Aryan Victory, and he advocates for it quite directly. Everyone should read it and his other literature, it is an astonishingly refreshing perspective to see such a fanatical National Socialist, be a complete outsider.
(76.87 KB 488x546 little.jpg)
>>3415 >What does it matter? The cafe was always going to kick us out and I don't consider it a loss You're right of course, but it's like how lowbrow retards post on /pol/ just to say "nigger" with no substance or cleverness. It's an embarrassing representation and that's why it was used as the scapegoat. And it was also used to make the few interesting non-White anons here less comfortable, which matters to me more than that, because other perspectives can contain useful information for us. Anyway, I think it's been aired out now and this is the last post I'll talk about it, likely. >That never happened, unequivocally. What never happened? The context of the post he replied to was that Gab banned all the smart NatSocs right after the Bowers shooting, along with banning Patrick Little (who was something of an e-celeb there at the time) a bit later after pic related. This was at the same time they brought in Rob Monster to help host them or something, I forget, a "free speech far-right advocate and site host". And of course Rob describes himself as a "bible-thumping Christian". That's when Gab began to get taken over the way you said, narratively. They had to misrepresent NatSoc first, it's the same "if you want to discredit someone, introduce their retarded cousin to everyone" tactic they use over and over. >>3416 Yes I know, but that particular shill was using ethnoglobe as a wedge to force non-Whites or even discussion about non-Whites off the board in the same way it was being used before we had to move here.
>>3317 >Gab banned all the smart NatSocs right after the Bowers shooting. Even so, the people posting ethnoglobe and discussing the only permanent course of action to fix this issue, were not likely agents provocateur. They just needed to manipulate their boosting algorithms which is what I saw, and perhaps that floated the least intelligent NS to the top. Thing is, I also saw just as much suppression of NS talking about exactly the same stuff I and other ethnoglobers say on here all the time. So, the association of that with disrupters is false in my opinion. The people who are disrupters needlessly get triggered by such discussion and push for less radical talk or, and this is something I run across on telegram quite frequently, push for acceptance of women who do not have husbands or children and who simply advocate for positions we all have held for years if not longer now. They also push for acceptance of christians because they believe can work with them, because this or that christian claims to be "Race First", when there is no such thing. Our enemy has never simply just been the jew, who would be no problem, if it were not for the Race Traitors, and not the obvious mudsharks, many of whom can be repurposed with a little reeducation. No, the worse by far wealthy system pillar Whites that drive the system to kill us for their economic interests whether they were Christian or not this has been one of our races chief problems since it's beginning. >Yes I know, but that particular shill was using ethnoglobe Oh, I didn't see the post it was in response to, it seems to have been deleted.
>>3434 I think we're merely talking around two different tactics used against us: the aforemented "retarded cousin" used to formulate narratives against us via misrepresentation (from the KKK being allowed to exist, the Frank Collin march, etc in real life, to internet examples such as the setup for Bowers articles on Gab), and the deradicalization you speak of. I simply disagree that it's deradicalizing to discourage discussions of no tactical or intellectual value, especially when this board is already practically the most radical board outside TOR. On the contrary, I think that it is deradicalizing to fantasize to such a degree versus focusing on our current predicament. And I don't think a disrupter has to be an agent; they can be a useful idiot. The posters who were eliminated on Gab were ones who could easily bring a Christcuck at least partially to our side via skillfully delivered redpills on the USS Liberty, 9/11, South Africa, Clinton / Rothschild emails, etc. They routinely made posts as thoughtful as Little's that cover every angle and are very difficult to argue against. It wasn't an algorithm used against them, it was that their accounts and all posts and replies were completely removed from the site, simultaneously, within hours of the shooting, as if they had an account list provided to them by the ADL or something. The ones that were left alone were the "fucking niggers kill all jews" variety. Surely, it is the first category that radicalizes others, while the second category is just around to prove the midwit meme true if they never post anything that might actually enlighten someone.
There are more people crying about ethnoglobe than actual serious discussion about ethnoglobe. We just got someone writing a long diatribe on Neu where he was scared shitless of the idea of ethnoglobe even though we hardly even talk about it. You pansies seem more terrified of the remote and abstract possibility of a White planet than the real and imminent trend toward a brown planet. It's even funnier that you try and make Tor posting a boogeyman because you are too stupid or lazy to practice infosec. Or maybe you are such a deradicalized non-threat to globohomo that there is no reason to even fear retaliation.
>>3447 >We just got someone writing a long diatribe on Neu where he was scared shitless of the idea of ethnoglobe even though we hardly even talk about it. Anon, that is one of the shills. Anyone who has used this board enough knows that there is a non-White shill who cries about ethnoglobe and how it’s going to kill him, and how that makes everything useless. He is different from the recent posts talking about ethnoglobe (or at least so I’d assume for most of them since I am one of the people who have complained)
>>3431 >And it was also used to make the few interesting non-White anons here less comfortable What the fuck am I reading here? I'm sure no one here would EVER want non-Whites here.
>>3458 Retards like you who drove several effortposting and well-liked oldfags from this board. Fuck you cancerfags
>>3459 Things started to get bad on cafe when the meme virus hit. /pol/ users without an alternative started shitting up the board hard with their newfound free time. It's really too bad, but there are still good posts now and then. Nothing like the peak days on 8chan and early jewlay though.
>>3465 It really started with Neinchan types coming here and not understanding the culture of this board. I don't necessarily think that people on Neuchan are wrong about the lack of a political solution in the like, but what irks me the most is that there is at least a subset of them who fail to understand that this board has been working a certain way since early 2018 fine, and doesn't need to be turned into just another /pol/ clone. I am an 8chan oldfag myself, but I'm not going to let cancer ruin the board. I'll just keep making the threads and posts I want and they can deal with it. This place is still far better than alternatives.
>>3458 >giant newfag makes a post Wow! Lurk two years.
>>3468 >but I'm not going to let cancer ruin the board. Then you would have no problem leaving the board, then :^)
>>3459 You need to reassess, both of them posted last on the cafe, nobody knows why they stopped or even if they stopped, this being an anonymous tibetan meditation forum and all, and if they couldn't handle some ribbing they weren't worth having around. Hel, I looked through most of Julay, before it went down, and Cafe and nobody ever did as you said, most of us simply had discussion, including ethnoglobe, with no problems. I, at least, also suggested that Anon's read Fair Races Darkest Hour and Cesar Torts other collections of essays, his other books are mostly autobiographical and most are not in English. >>3465 No they didn't, they stayed the same, the discussion is good, and to say otherwise is frankly disingenuous in the extreme. >>3468 There is absolutely no danger of that happening we still have the same board owner who while becoming more Natsoc over the years, he has not changed his moderation style much, if at all, a decline in quality only began just before we got the news thread to contain the niggers from all over the webring who came to us for the news and shit up the board it has little to nothing to do with /pol/ as many anon's are cross-posters and have been since the beginning.
>>3626 >No they didn't, they stayed the same, the discussion is good, and to say otherwise is frankly disingenuous in the extreme. There is good discussion here but lately it's been getting buried under retards screaming about shills and how everyone but them is larping or whatever. I was being a bit hyperbolic when I said "starting to get bad" but there has been a noticeable decline which can only be stopped by bullying retards like >>3822.
(311.43 KB 1338x710 synarchist anon.png)
>>3459 That's what we get with the retarded ethnoglobe niggers. RIP Synarchist-anon and Mongol-anon, you hearts are true, and I hope you fags are doing well.
>>3836 Boo-hoo, also go back to cuckchan, there's nothing chad about synarchy.
>>3836 It wasn't ethnoglobe that drove Synarchist-anon out, it was a subset of Neinchan fags. Ethnoglobe spergs are a permutation of this, but not identical. I don't really have a problem with ethnoglobe in and of itself, it's merely that a few of the most vocal advocates for here are rather low-quality posters (and I believe it to be one or two people). >>3837 It is you who should go back to Cuckchan, newfag. Oldfags like that who were driven out consistently delivered quality and well thought-out posts. They were /fascist/ in its purest essence. I would reckon today that every post that is longer than a few sentences here is posted by the true oldfags that remain.
>>3839 Nigger you're telling me to go back to cuckchan, when you're cuckchan-tier posting memes and delusions, while samefagging on TOR on and off. You are indeed cancer, because you won't shut the fuck crying like a woman about muh Mexican. And constantly come on here equating one poster to everyone on the board, because they talk about how much they hate niggers just once. Either do 41% or talk about an unpopular opinion you have that isn't about ethnoglobe or your favourite posters.
>>3841 It's funny to me how you can't even entertain the idea that there might legitimately be more than one person who holds opinions similar to >>3836 and that they all have to be some one ubiquitous samefag. Even if I was not on Tor, I'm sure you would find more excuses for how everyone who complains about cancer is the same person.
In my opinion, it's better to be sexually deviant than be sexually apathetic.
>>3848 Hard disagree, depending on what you mean by 'sexually deviant'. If you're talking in a very minor sense of some dude who is otherwise normal being really attracted to, say, feet or certain types of clothing, that's really minor, but when it comes to true sexual deviance, at this point I believe that out of everything that can become perverted from its natural purposes in human beings, there is nothing that can fall further or become more fucked up and twisted than the sex drive. Some of the stuff out there is truly twisted, sick and depraved to such an extent that I can hardly believe it.
>>3848 Sexual deviants can create one or more non-White people. Sexual apathy does not.
>>3863 Seems like a classic quality over quantity situations. Degenerates spawn more of their own kind
>>3841 The whinging about Tor is getting out of hand. You should be on it anyways if you gave two shits about your infosec you lazy faggots. Should be ashamed of yourselves. If you didn't move to a VPN years ago when anons warned you, you were an idiot. The same is true now for Tor. Get with the times.
I think we should work with Christians.
>>3847 You are literally samefagging. No one here was complaining about muh ethnoglobe posters on here until one anon sperged out over something that wasn't even happening on the board. This board is dead and it does not make sense that after each post you create comes another 5 minutes after supporting your mental retardation, as it if wasn't obvious considering you both talk the same way and bitch about them same stupid shit. You're not fooling anyone negro. >>3871 >The whinging about Tor is getting out of hand. See what I'm talking about you're so fucking stupid, just kill yourself. >>3946 Fascism and NatSoc will never work with Christcuckery. Christcucks strongly believe in being spiritually Semitic and cucking themselves for all eternity for organizations that don't care about them and only wanted to mind control their useful idiots who. The NSDAP failed to work with the Catholics despite, most fascists across Europe being Catholic and the Western Axis Power collaborating with the Vatican State. The NSDAP failed to work with the Lutherans who didn't want their churches to be absorbed and integrated by the Reich to create a single unified church, so everyone could hold the same beliefs and ideals in compatibility and unity of the NatSoc government. Fascism and National Socialism will never be able to work with White Christians, unless they disregard their churches and realize that they aren't Semitic, but European and only European.
>>3950 I understand what you're saying, but if Fascism were to ever to rise again, then it's going to be majority christian over pagan, agnostics, and atheist. It's true that the Reich and Mussolini did fail to get christians to be on board to make their primary goals a reality, but most of the failures can be contribute to the fact that they had so many traitors who didn't really care about the state of the West. I still think we should work with the ones who are willing to become full fash and implent positive christianity. Fascism had some good christian leaders who were very J-pilled and even ridiculed modern christian theology.
>>3950 >This board is dead <AHHH I NEED CONSTANT STIMULATION AND NEW POSTS EVERY FIVE MINUTES We've been on 16chan for a month, and we've basically had 4,000 posts already. Let's assume we've been here for 40 days too, giving us an average of about 100 posts a day, which is pretty solid on a small imageboard like this. /fascist/ has never been fast, and that's a good thing. >>3946 It's necessary to an extent, but only as far as that we'll inevitably be having to work with Christians if we are to be successful. The real problem is if they let their Christianity get in the way. That is when we absolutely cannot deal with them and cuck ourselves to them. This is basically my position on the problem. If they are Christian, fine, but if they make everything about their jew and how say that certain things that need to be done are 'immoral', then they have become an issue. The sad fact of the matter is that in my experiences IRL, literally everyone even close to redpilled that I've met has been a Christian. Statistically it's true too. They're not anywhere close to where they need to be of course, but they're healthy than the average population.
>>3954 >AHHH I NEED CONSTANT STIMULATION AND NEW POSTS EVERY FIVE MINUTES Kek, I never implied anything like this. You really are retarded. Last (You).
>>3953 > I still think we should work with the ones who are willing to become full fash and implent positive christianity. Christians who understand the natural order are better of converting to Buddhism, because they will likely find themselves disappointed at how Christians such as the boomers and Evangelicals will disregard positive Christianity as "pagan", "demonic", or "heretical".
>>3958 >>3958 More than Buddhism, probably Vaishnava sects of Hinduism would be more attractive to Christians. I've shown some stuff like that to a few Christians in real life and they have found it very interesting, especially in terms of what they see as similarities. Not that Buddhism is bad of course.
>>3958 Control the church and you control the Christian perspective. Positive Christianity was done to reconcile National Socialist thought with the German Protestant Church. It succeeded until the war was lost, with most protestant christians supporting the NS cause. To bring over the Christians to accept racial separation, it must be brought about on moral grounds. For example, if more than half of the Papal conclave are sympathetic to our cause, they will elect a Pope with proper ideals, with sufficient justification to ban race-mixing and racial integration. When the masses hear about it, they too will be more accepting of our position.
>>4003 But didn't this fail in the end and some of the Protestant churches only supported the NSDAP? I doubt Christians would be in favor of eugenics and work out weekly like the National Socialist wanted for all Germans. If I remember correctly there were notes where Hitler himself was disappointed at how Christians weren't treating the war like a holy crusade or maybe they weren't doing all of what the NSDAP desired?
>>4003 Clericals & the religious right would not be happy with subordinating the Church to any benefit for the political good and racial harmony--that would deeply upset them. Political authority to them is uninspired and mundane, plays no great affair. To place National Socialism above Christianity would be heretical. I really can't imagine what tradcaths would think about subordinating the Pope and handpicking him.
>>4004 >But didn't this fail in the end and some of the Protestant churches only supported the NSDAP? Yes, there was too much internal infighting and disagreements with the National Socialist state and the clergymen and priests of the Protestant and Catholic churches. The NSDAP tried to work with christcucks and change their perspectives, but they didn't see things the way Gobbels, Hitler, and Himmler saw when it came to the ethnic-struggle and slave morality/mindset within Christianity. https://infogalactic.com/info/Positive_Christianity I think Infogalactic shares truths regarding the affairs of Positive Christianity. Nothing seems to be contradictory or misinformation when you understand how crazy christians are when it comes to their faith.
>>4004 >I doubt Christians would be in favor of eugenics And they weren't. They were one of the biggest stumbling blocks to the Third Reich's eugenics program, and this is whether we are talking of the original 1933 sterilization bill or the later T4 euthanasia campaign that began in 1939. There was even a papal encyclical issued by Pope Pius XII that condemned euthanasia, and by extension eugenics: <We deem it necessary to reiterate this grave statement today, when to Our profound grief We see at times the deformed, the insane, and those suffering from hereditary disease deprived of their lives, as though they were a useless burden to Society; and this procedure is hailed by some as a manifestation of human progress, and as something that is entirely in accordance with the common good. Yet who that is possessed of sound judgment does not recognize that this not only violates the natural and the divine law [182] written in the heart of every man, but that it outrages the noblest instincts of humanity? The blood of these unfortunate victims who are all the dearer to our Redeemer because they are deserving of greater pity, "cries to God from the earth."[183] http://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_29061943_mystici-corporis-christi.html Hitler mentioned in his Second Book the following: <The abandonment of sick, frail, deformed children—in other words, their destruction—demonstrated greater human dignity and was in reality a thousand times more humane than the pathetic insanity of our time, which attempts to preserve the lives of the sickest subjects—at any price—while taking the lives of a hundred thousand healthy children through a decrease in the birth rate or through abortifacient agents, subsequently breeding a race of degenerates burdened with illness This is exactly what Christcucks do. They preserve everything that ought to perish. That is what Nietzsche wrote too in Beyond Good and Evil. He recognized that the religions of today were religions for the suffering, for degenerates, for weaklings, and that they were set on nothing less but the degeneration of the European race. Positive Christianity was a complete failure. Even Hitler recognized this by the end of the war.
>>3958 >>4004 >>4005 >>4009 >>4018 Even if Christianity is agaisnt Fascism and NatSoc, I still think we seek to control and take over rearrange their beliefs through their churches, scriptures and priests/clergymen. If the jew is able to do this, then I think we should adopt them same tactic as well, even when it comes to non-Whites and other religions. I don't care if we have to force them to accept Fascism or the natural order as the one truth, we still need Christians on our side to be able to fight agaisnt the jew and save our nations. No compromise can be made with the them in terms of their Judaic spirituality, otherwise we will go back from where we started and fail. Truth and might must prevail over falsehoods.
>>4023 This is probably possible to an extent. The Whitepill about this whole situation is that most of the population really doesn't read the Bible. They are completely ignorant about the vast majority of the stuff in that book, or if they tried to read it they got bored and gave up somewhere in Genesis or Exodus. Most people's knowledge of the Bible is gained through out-of-context quotes and from Church (if they even go). The average normalfag Christcuck just believes in God, reads a few out-of-context Bible quotes occasionally and probably prays occasionally. This probably shields them from some of the degeneracy and slave morality peddled within the Bible, and that which is emphasized by the jews. I think they can be worked with to an extent but I wouldn't let them into any positions of influence within a hypothetical group. Unfortunately despite even all of this, Christians are very bluepilled on race usually.
>>4023 >even when it comes to non-Whites and other religions I'm confused in this part.
>>4023 >I don't care if we have to force them to accept Fascism or the natural order as the one truth, we still need Christians on our side to be able to fight against the jew and save our nations. I will say this only once, we do not need the christians, not for anything, if you think we will ever get power without COMPLETE destruction of this society you are a fool, and complete destruction includes destroying the enemy religion that dominates our lands. This will not be peaceful, it will not be nice and it will not be easy, quit dreaming about having numbers we fight for quality, not quantity.
>>4046 He's an idiot literally saying "lets subvert everybody else like the jew bro, it'll totally work, even though they've beaten us at it, at literally every juncture!".
>>4004 >But didn't this fail in the end and some of the Protestant churches only supported the NSDAP? Since the state had influence over the clergy, there was little organised resistance. >I doubt Christians would be in favor of eugenics They can be made to. The mormons had the right idea when it came to religious hatred. Call jews the antichrist and Negros the spawn of Cain, and the Church would approve of eugenics. The problem with the German Church is that no actions were taken to justify their position using Christian theology. >>4005 >Clericals & the religious right would not be happy with subordinating the Church to any benefit for the political good and racial harmony--that would deeply upset them Crypto-marxists have been subordinating the church for a couple decades now, and the Clericals have done nothing to stop it. If subversion takes place towards the fascist side, why would they raise their voice now when they've been silent all these years?
>>4023 >No compromise can be made with the them in terms of their Judaic spirituality, Therefore we crush the church. Christianity is inherently Judaic spirituality. Everything spiritually beneficial within Christianity has parallels in other healthy Aryan traditions, whether they be Buddhism, Vaishnavism or Zoroastrianism. Abrahamists literally took the attributes of Ahura Mazda, pretended that their jew-god was AM and then passed him off to the world as the real God. A case of divine identity theft. If we were able to get into such a position where we could exert pressure on the church and clergy, we would be better off putting resources into gradually deprogramming Christians into positive pathways by dissolving their religion through education and concerted spiritual propaganda rather than trying to fix the entire jewish shit-heap. We would certainly not be lacking in powet at that point.
>>4053 > Call jews the antichrist and Negros the spawn of Cain Wouldn't all non-Whites be the spawn of Cain? Since nature is unpredictable, there are bound to be exceptions (outliers) per race. Is there a term for them in religious contexts?
>>4084 >Wouldn't all non-Whites be the spawn of Cain? Not necessarily. There's already hints in the Bible that non-Whites already existed outside of Eden, for example when God banished Cain he went east to the Land of Nod there were already humans there. Pre-Adamic humans.
>>4053 >why would they raise their voice now when they've been silent all these years? Because they did against Germany and Italy both, yet they didn't against communists, the Christians within russia were allowed to practice their religion so long as they supported the state, yet could not and WOULD not in Germany.
(232.52 KB 1076x1280 feminism not even once.jpg)
>>2784 >that video It gets worse.
>>4116 The difference is aggression. Italy directly wanted to incorporate the Vatican and Mussolini failed at pretending to be a christian until 1943 when he became christian. In, Germany I was under the impression that even with the Positive Christianity being forced too fast, the churches were mostly loyal. The problem is their subversion of the Church was slow and gradual. Any counter subversion must also be slow and gradual
Aryans have been jewish slaves for 1,000 years.
>>4262 This is unpopular because the real number is 2,000, though it has not always been direct control, and not all of Europe was conquered at once.
>>4262 >>4263 Parasite hands samefagged these posts
>>4264 I consider my post about how jews have in some respects controlled jews for 2,000 years to be fairly uncontroversial. In a spiritual sense we have been victims of the jews stretching back to the days of the late Roman Empire. We have not been total slaves in the physical sense until the late 18th or 19th century though, and this has accelerated greatly since 1945. In the past though people were at least smart enough to retaliate against and kill jews from time to time, expelling them from the realm, but due to the nature of the modern system even this has become very difficult.
>>4266 >I consider my post about how jews have in some respects controlled jews for 2,000 years to be fairly uncontroversial. Except that it's bullshit, jews desperately need us, we don't need jews that's why they have kept coming back relentlessly after being expelled and killed. Just like a tick or leech desperately needs blood a jew desperately needs to exploit peoples to feed on. Even today look at American foreign policy towards israel, the parasites in that rathole country do not create or do anything noteworthy even though it's their dream ethnostate they've wanted for 6 trillion years they are incapable, they get daddy ZOG USA who's politicians they entrapped with masonic lodges and people like epstein to hand them cash to quite literally pay for everything, it is pure parasitism. >In the past though people were at least smart enough to retaliate against and kill jews from time to time, expelling them from the realm, but due to the nature of the modern system even this has become very difficult. Yes but actually it has become remarkably easy with the internet at disposal. Of course aside from the propaganda brainwashing and mental terrorism the jews try to inflict to people, and this is eliminated by not tuning in to their propaganda, especially TV.
>>4145 So you're just illiterate and a jew. what you're saying is "Hey fellow goys, we can totally infiltrate and subvert the churches who are actually following the still fictional words and deeds of jesus according to the actions of the original mostly jewish converts to christianity in 60CE whose pattern of behavior continued until 2021 CE" good luck being a jew.
>>4276 You're actually really fucking stupid holy shit.
>>4277 Virtually all of the anti-Christians on /fascist/ are. Imagine turning against Christian WN's before dealing with leftists and jews. These people are clearly subversive agents. The anti-Christian sentiment on this board is comical. >inb4 cartoon of Christian sucking jewish penis etc.
>>4277 Nah, that's you, Anyone who thinks we have either the time or the nature to subvert like the jew is an idiot, or a jew themselves and any pro-christian also hasn't read The Fair Racve's Darkest Hour, or Karlheinz Denscher's Kriminalgesichte des Christentums. the original Christians acted just like their bolshevik children do today.
>>4279 >>4277 Samefag
>>4282 >schizo
>>4279 What's the big deal if we banter, discuss, research, and for very specific reasons, don't like your semitic desert derived religion, you don't have to participate in them. If you saw White race and 1488 being the most important( more important than some dead rabbi from 2020 years ago which cult were just freeriding on roman republic's decline and wealth bluntly stated) I'm sure you'd agree with me too.
>>4283 Yeah, totally a schizo. No, just realized that Christains have been the hotbed for system supporting and just race traitors in general among our people since Rome, which they destroyed in the same manner the bolsheviks are today, not that I'm complaining Rome was killing itself anyway but America would probably be just fine if it weren't for Christains and Christian Values which the "marxists" you claim to oppose follow to the letter better than many of you..
>>4284 >>4285 You are both so pathetic you punch the soft target of pacifist Christians (the same target the rest of the world punches) before you do anything about the problems we all face. If Christians are such a big deal, why bother doing anything? Not only is the rest of the world working to destroy them, they are destroying themselves. The number of Christians is DECREASING worldwide. Go ahead, keep writing strong letters in a niche corner of the internet about those DASTARDLY CHRISTIANS!
>>4271 What you say about jews being parasites does not refute the fact that Europeans for the last two millennia have been kike slaves. The exact process is different, but jews are akin in some respects to slave-making ants who infiltrate other ant nests and set the ants of another species to work for them. They are helpless without their slaves. Same with the jews. >Yes but actually it has become remarkably easy with the internet at disposal. Of course aside from the propaganda brainwashing and mental terrorism the jews try to inflict to people, and this is eliminated by not tuning in to their propaganda, especially TV. Turning off the TV is not enough. Every aspect of your life is controlled by the jew and you can hardly even realize it. Most of the food you eat is owned and distributed by jews. Most of the laws are passed by jews. Most music you hear is written by jews and put out by jew-owned radio stations. Most religious people follow jewish religions and celebrate jewish holidays. The only way to escape the jews today is to live in the woods away from civilization, and even then the jews will eventually chop down the trees and build some apartments for their pet apes or shit up the entire area with the pollution and litter from their shekel-making schemes.
>>4279 Christians are fundamentally leftists and proto-Marxists. This has been discussed here time and time again, and for anyone who has not drank the Cool-Aid this should be abundantly clear. I advise you to read the effortpost attached. Also >>4281 is very right—the first Christians exhibited Marxoid tendencies extremely clearly, as can demonstrated in my second and third quotes. >>4286 >the same target the rest of the world punches For different reasons. Ultimately Christianity is a form of Abrahamism, i.e. of Judaism. This is the number one reason /fascist/ raises the alarm about this mental virus. Leftists / progressives attack Christianity because it is basically an out-of-date system of control that has been superceded by materialism, atheism, communism and globo-homo in a general sense. This is why Marxists in Russia and elsewhere slaughtered Christians. Both spring from the same Judaic foundation, but one is newer and more suited to the times, thus it was decried as being “regressive” or “reactionary”. Christianity is a false religion which turns us away from our native gods, that undermines the Aryan’s ability of self-assertion, his values, and way of living. It must be rejected, along with all Abrahamists. >If Christians are such a big deal, why bother doing anything? We must deprogram Christians and lead them down a positive path in order to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children. Oftentimes they may be right about some things, but they are very, very far astray due to the kike brainwashing in other areas. Christianity, the entire Abrahamic phenomenon in truth, is killing our Volk. We must overcome it within ourselves.
>>4288 >Christians are fundamentally leftists and proto-Marxists Complete load of hogwash. Absolutely laughable that you think any of what you've said passes for intellectual rigor. I'm only replying to watch you faggots sperg more over the C-word. Nigger cucklord.
>>4289 Guffawing is not a refutation. You clearly fail to grasp what the essence of leftism truly is. Christianity falls under that umbrella. Think more, lash out less.
(2.39 MB 368x368 shit.mp4)
>>4291 >so mad you’re reduced to posting cuckchan memes at a post you’ve already sperged at once Yikes
>>4292 Fuck you nigger, that video came straight from my grandma you faggot bitch.
>>4293 Not a very Christlike way of speaking
>>4294 >perfectly predictable response i spoke this way specifically to show how gay and manipulable you cookie cutter faggots are. fuck you. >whines about shitposting and doubleposts in unpopular opinions thread while expressing a popular opinion on the board
>>4286 How am I pathetic just asked you a genuine question about what your problem is with us discussing your religion because; If you see that your White race is more important than religion religion is almost irrelevant and a frivolous matter, and there's no two way's about this question. >>4287 No they haven't, unless you are willing to make a whole bunch of incredibly far fetched connections especially considering how many times they've been expelled and killed. I also can't help but notice how you love talking about aryan/White slaves and slaves to jews in your sentences to so much schlomo, are you some fag with a masochistic streak or are you just a jew getting turned on by writing untrue fiction? both? >Turning off the TV is not enough. Every aspect of your life is controlled by the jew and you can hardly even realize it. Wow such news most people here and our side realize this.
>>4296 >faggot can't even stick to /anti-abrahamism general/ you can discuss Christianity all you want, you can discuss it forever while you burn in hell, dickless sissy nigger.
>>4296 >No they haven't, unless you are willing to make a whole bunch of incredibly far fetched connections especially considering how many times they've been expelled and killed. “It was real in my mind”—Christians here have never refuted the anti-Christians here once. They all screech and cry just like you and your little autistic buddy ITT right now are doing. >I also can't help but notice how you love talking about aryan/White slaves and slaves to jews in your sentences to so much schlomo, are you some fag with a masochistic streak or are you just a jew getting turned on by writing untrue fiction? both? Do facts hurt? Should I tell you that everything is good and that the magical sky jew is coming to rapture us all away? To trust the plan? I have never said all was lost and that you should be blackpilled—it says more about the person who draws such a conclusion than the bare fact itself.
>>4297 Race is infinitely more important than Religion, until you realize this and can hold a conversation without your desert religion programming interfering with normal neuron function you can get fucked christcuck death cultist.
>>4299 >death cultist Idk bro, my God loves and protects me. >imagine a religion that can’t even be spoken about positively on the unpopular opinions thread of a niche “free speech” corner of the internet Yeah, those darned Christians are keeping us all down, man! Enemy of the White race for sure! You fucks are absurd.
>>4298 If you write fiction here expect to get called out on it. Imagine calling the objectively greatest race on earth, all, collectively, "slave to jews" for not 100 years but 2000. The most untrue masochistic loser garbage I've read in a while and It's an embarrassment.
>>4302 It’s just a fact, bro. You seem to envision all slavery as just abject submission to the master—this isn’t what I mean. I mean that in one sense or another the people of Europe have been mentally colonized by foreign Semitic ideologies that have gradually inverted Aryan values and spawned the monstrosity of modernity. Full slavery to the jews really began with the industrial revolution. I know it’s terrifying to acknowledge, but that’s the truth of the matter. Acceptance is the first step.
>>4303 >zoomer drivel
>>4286 I'm punching you faggots because you aren't just pacifists but are the single most present threat to my cause the survival of the Aryan race. At every turn you christniggers have not only destroyed the lives of millions upon of our race. You also killed the priest classes of all our native religions so that all we have left is stories written down by you putrid fucking parasites or written down by the grandchildren of the last actively practicing generation, from half-remembered stories they were taught as children. Furthermore, every fucking time our people have tried to rise up and throw off the shackles that YOU assholes put on us at the command of your jewish masters, you attempt to assassinate(Hitler multiple times) infiltrate and snitch out and eventually cause the assassination/Incarceration of(Rockwell, Lane, Matthews), every single group that has tried to organize resistance to the system, and to add insult to injury you fucking niggers come here with your JESUS WAS ARYAN nSHIEET BRO and WE WUZ ISRAELITES shit, and have the audacity to claim you are the only "Real nationalists". So, no I am done with your cries, I am done with you traitors and I will see the Aryan race cleansed of your filth before I die.
>>4301 So your Race or Religion? Which is it? >Yeah, those darned Christians are keeping us all down, man! Enemy of the White race for sure! You fucks are absurd. Not exactly but If you picture all the millions of White people just sitting around praying and "worrshippinnn" pacifistic-ally conveniently just believing the volcano god will axe and punishhhh all the evil, sadistic, collections fucked up bastards clinging to life on this planet trying their best to make our their/our White lives miserable. It's especially bad when these idiots teach others to be pacifistic against people who are murdering or abusing them in their lands so they can allegedly go to some mythical place then yes it is a problem, quite a fucking big one actually, not to mention the race mixing shit they do where they literally claim everyone is equal and so much more. And perhaps one of the biggest problems; for some reason despite the religion existing for so long literally none of it is ethnocentric, at all. Really not even one widely popular ethnocentric offshoot of it. >>4303 >Make total lie up about 2000 years by total extrapolation Now changing word definitions on the fly? Honestly lol.
>>4307 >Now changing word definitions on the fly? Not entirely, especially if we distinguish between indirect / mental enslavement and direct / physical enslavement.
(533.03 KB 1280x1280 Real_Jews.jpg)
>>4306 Bro jesus descended from king david who was literally White. Just look at this meme bro.
(475.85 KB 1059x701 1620098175809.png)
>yet another thread devolves into "christkeks bad" We have a thread for this already, it's called /aag/.
>>4311 >literally posting soyjak memes It's so obvious that you people are outsiders it's not even funny. You fail to realize that just because this in an unpopular opinions thread, that all retards will be able to post whatever they want without being responded to or mocked for their stupid opinions. /fascist/ is a board dedicated to raising awareness about Abrahamism
>>4296 Expulsions are failures to deal with the problem. It's also likely that there were always crypto-jews in power, like Christian converts, who remained even when the visible jews were expelled. The cryptos would make sure their tribesmen were let back in very quickly.
(48.49 KB 600x476 jew devil.jpg)
>>4334 >Expulsions are failures to deal with the problem. Very true. It is like playing hot potato with the JQ. You just pass it onto another group and hope that the jews won't come back. And of course we know they always come back. Today especially given mass media, communication and transportation, expulsion has been completely bankrupted as any sort of solution to the JQ, as has Zionism. The only solution is gas-chambers, and I truly believe that. Many of the kings of Europe were ensnared into Christianity by their wives and by promises of power. They were completely beholden to jewish money and interests. It was quite literally a deal with the devil.
>>4328 >pic not even related Surprising really, I would have thought that /fascist/ is for fascist discussion and not whining about "abrahamism" every thread.
(3.89 MB 1920x1080 william pierce christianity.png)
>>4336 I can't emphasize enough the importance of understanding the nature of Abrahamism and its role in history. If you want to truly grasp the JQ, you have to understand Abrahamism. Same with leftism and many things which have had a pernicious influence throughout recorded history.
>>4336 How come you don't see it that our worldview is factually elaborate, steady and mature enough to discuss many different problems without melting down like literally every other ideological group? All I see are people who believe in Yaweh complaining and no one else. Weird huh? I've not heard one compelling argument from abrahamists as to why exactly we need the jewDesertScrollz(r)NonOrganic TorahLiteCuckDeraciated4GoysTM by the way, if you really feel the need to believe it go ahead but don't act like it's great or just, because it isn't. Compare it to great societies and you find christianity teaches fucking none of our core organic ethnic values, quite opposite it teaches egalitarian marxism and inversion, censorship where intelligent people and early visionaries, thinkers and inventors were not appreciated as in the past but often tortured and murdered at a pyre for literally not "respecting" some strange volcano god. See:Galileo Galilei who was inches close to being murdered by christcucks. If you ask me the garbage religion has been the shame of our race. Martin Luther had already shown what the desert religion was really about in 1510. He was ignored when he actually proved it was a philosemitic scam by investigating the talmud/torah when being tasked to write the new testament finding out what jews really wrote about nonjews in the "real old testament" and told no one in the new cult about. For this finding especially christcuck catholic jew world order (((elites))) at the time reacted violently attacked him for simply telling the truth about jews, how harmful they were and were ready to murder him so he had stage a kidnapping and hide as a knight. But when Christianity's pitfalls become evident is for example evident in the enlightenment age beginning in 1620 where White people realized they had to rethink because theocracy was clearly a miserable, and so we gave up focusing so much on dark ages causing christianity and again like 'pagans' not being bound to insane rules and focusing on trying to understand our real circumstance; Nature, again, which was sparked by people like Francis Bacon who wrote Novum Organum(true directions concerning the interpretation of nature). Only there is where we found our success. Only then were most amazing inventions and feats made again.
>>4334 >Expulsions are failures to deal with the problem That's for kikes. What about anybody not White?
>>4337 ah yes the freemason shill WLP
>>4344 Expulsions are workable for them. Non-Whites don't have the same international networking capabilities and powers the way jews do.
Fucking married women to cuck weak men (and making them watch) is based and alpha. If you disagree you're a cuck and you know it. Women ARE resources.
>>4437 The real question here is whether it's worth it steal used goods. If I had the level of chadness that you're describing here, I'd be looking for unmarried virgin girls to marry
>>4449 >>4437 Get lost, you just need a girlfriend, unironically.
>>4479 >you just need a girlfriend, unironically. I know
>>4347 WLP was no freemason shill.
>>4511 >>4347 Regardless of whether WLP was a freemason shill or not, his efforts and memoirs serve as excellent tools for increasing the resolve of any fascist.
I think the ANC needs purging from SA; not in and of itself an unpopular opinion here, but after that I'd like to see the land split between a new Boer polity, and the Zulu kingdom, since king Goodwill Zwelethini has been extremely critical of the ANC, and has supplied a lot of tacit support to the Boers.
>>4533 It's probably the most realistic future if Boers were to get an independent state. There are too few Whites to control all of South Africa at this point, I'd say, especially when the blacks have gotten a taste of freedom the last few decades. I cannot see them going down softly. Places like Orania and Kleinfontein would be the foundations of any future Boer state. I'm not going to pretend like I know the whole history of apartheid, but it seems like part of the mistake was creating these bantustans and large-scale segregation, and then relying on the labor of these people and becoming dependent on them, especially when they were massively growing in population compared to the White areas of South Africa.If there's one thing we can learn from history it's that becoming reliant on non-Whites for labor is always a mistake. Also apparently that king Goodwill Zwelethini just died about a month ago. I wonder what his son will be like
>>4536 Well shit. You never can tell with monarchies. Sometimes you get a dud. However, if he is a lemon, the good thing is somebody might chuck a spear though his 'eid. Bit harder to do that to a whole parliamentary democracy.
Abortion should be legal in case both parents agree.
>>4536 >Goodwill Zwelethini How is this nigger able to go against the feral niggers of ANC? >>4837 >However, if he is a lemon, the good thing is somebody might chuck a spear though his 'eid. Cannot compute, can you explain?
>>4841 People should not have sex if they are not prepared for the consequences.
>>4846 Disagreed. You can be prepared and still get it wrong.
>>4347 Do you have proof that he was a freemason shill or are you just the same butthurt christcuck? >>4437 You must be the same cumbrain who spouted nonsense about how we could break women's mental state into submission by raping them and then recommended a porn game on the QTDDTOT thread. Go away and stop watching porn. >>4848 This doesn't make sense, if you're prepared then there shouldn't be any excuses for why you've gotten it wrong. It's either you want a kid or don't want it, and if you don't want a perfectly healthy child then the option for abortion is off the table and should not be up to the parents. If you're talking about in a case of eugenics, then again it shouldn't really be up to the parents to decide what genes should the child have and carry over and they should not kill them off because the offspring didn't have the genes they wanted personally.
>>4856 >This doesn't make sense, if you're prepared then there shouldn't be any excuses for why you've gotten it wrong. You speak as if preparation inevitably lead to success, but that is not how life works. Preparation increases the odds of success, but doesn't ensures it. Nothing does. >if you don't want a perfectly healthy child then the option for abortion is off the table and should not be up to the parents. Why? >If you're talking about in a case of eugenics, then again it shouldn't really be up to the parents to decide what genes should the child have and carry over and they should not kill them off because the offspring didn't have the genes they wanted personally. I disagree. It's their offspring and their genes. Forcing couples to keep an unwanted child will not lead to a good rising environment for the child, the parents and everybody around.
>>4862 >Forcing couples to keep an unwanted child will not lead to a good rising environment for the child, the parents and everybody around. That's why people who do not want children should not have sex, period. This might be impossible for retarded animals though, who can't seem to realize that ultimately sex is for having children and not just mindless pleasure.
>>4866 >That's why people who do not want children should not have sex, period. Disagreed. >This might be impossible for retarded animals though, who can't seem to realize that ultimately sex is for having children and not just mindless pleasure. This is not true. Sex is not "mindless pleasure", nor is it just for having children. Sex is also a complex group behavior which is directly linked to the psychosocial hierarchy.
(378.29 KB 1080x1350 pregnant white woman.jpg)
>>4878 >Sex is not "mindless pleasure", nor is it just for having children. Sex is also a complex group behavior which is directly linked to the psychosocial hierarchy. I'd say at least that it's primary purpose is having children—that much should be fairly uncontroversial. This isn't to say that you should only have sex to have children. That is a fairly extreme position and far too puritan. A man and his wife can (and will) certainly have sex just for 'recreational' purposes. I still think that if people want to avoid having children so badly that they should just avoid having sex. Obviously you disagree with me here but I'm assuming we'll just have to agree to disagree on this particular matter.
>>4879 First this: >That's why people who do not want children should not have sex, period. Then this: >This isn't to say that you should only have sex to have children. That is a fairly extreme position and far too puritan. Those are contradictory positions anon, choose one. >I'd say at least that it's primary purpose is having children The kidneys's primary purpose is to filter blood. Another function of this organ is to produce hormones which regulate the creation of red blood cells, and without them, a quick death is certain. Non-primary purpose is not neglectable purpose.
>>4881 >Those are contradictory positions anon, choose one. They're not contradictory though. What I am saying is that if you're having sex you should be prepared to deal with any potential consequences, i.e. pregnancy. This is far from saying to only have sex to have children. >Non-primary purpose is not neglectable purpose. I wouldn't deny this, but there are still potential consequences people should be prepared to face.
The average White woman peaks around 15, then it's all downhill from there.
>>4843 What I mean is, an heir is like a keystone. A bad heir can be removed far more easily than a bad system, and the whole shitshow will collapse ready for reconstitution under a more suitable pretender. Makes cleaning house easier. And the reason the Zulus don't really bend to the ANC is that they have an identity that isn't pedicated on being the perpetual victim of da whyte mann. All the same, maybe he will be a good king. Time will tell.
(75.47 KB 674x506 schopenhauer 2.jpg)
>>4884 This should really just be common sense as far as I'm concerned. >With girls, Nature has had in view what is called in a dramatic sense a “striking effect,” for she endows them for a few years with a richness of beauty and a, fulness of charm at the expense of the rest of their lives; so that they may during these years ensnare the fantasy of a man to such a degree as to make him rush into taking the honourable care of them, in some kind of form, for a lifetime—a step which would not seem sufficiently justified if he only considered the matter. Accordingly, Nature has furnished woman, as she has the rest of her creatures, with the weapons and implements necessary for the protection of her existence and for just the length of time that they will be of service to her; so that Nature has proceeded here with her usual economy. Just as the female ant after coition loses her wings, which then become superfluous, nay, dangerous for breeding purposes, so for the most part does a woman lose her beauty after giving birth to one or two children; and probably for the same reasons. http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html
>>4862 >You speak as if preparation inevitably lead to success Not that anon, but what do you mean by "success" if you're not prepared to take care of your child, because it's not what you wanted personally then you aren't fit to be a parent. You don't need to constantly abort the fetus when it's already perfectly health. If the kid will not suffers from any mental and/or physical issues then there should be no reason to kill it. >Preparation increases the odds of success, but doesn't ensures it. This implies that we are willing to allow just anyone to reproduce and create children. >Why? Foolish question, parent's aren't always smart and going to know what is best when it comes to birthing kids. Some parents are dumb enough to want abortions simply, because their child does not particular genes they want to see in their child as if they're a toy. What is best for the family and race is going to be decided by state. >I disagree. It's their offspring and their genes. It's their offspring and it's the improvement pf our race that is more important than what parent's what especially if they're christcucks. NS is supportive of eugeneics and improving our people to the next evolution by both physical spiritual means. The rights of White does not matter when their opinions and feelings get in the way of our progress to help them for a greater good. > Forcing couples to keep an unwanted child will not lead to a good rising environment for the child I agree, which is why the only couples that should be allowed to reproduce are the ones who are actually prepared for a child even if it isn't what they expected. A family who can only produce healthy and strong offspring has to take care of what they've created no ifs or butts, otherwise they lose their right to be proper parents or even citizens. Good parents are always willing to take responsibility for the sake of their race and future for a better nation. I only support abortions if the child is unwell on a genetic level.
>>4884 The average White woman peaks around 18 which is their best age for beauty and pregnancy at the same time.
>>4909 >or even citizens Harsh.
>>4910 I can only imagine someone had a gun to your head as you typed this.
(289.81 KB 1440x1689 9aphmdnwpul61.jpg)
(5.70 KB 225x225 images.jpg)
He did nothing wrong.
>>4910 18 is also the time where they get cum dumped and fucked. Pick your poison.
>>4910 They should be married before that or they are likely already ruined by that age.
>>4927 >implying this is an unpopular opinion also, I began seeing memes about him a couple of months ago. Have these memes always been around? Or have they popped up relatively recently (probably due to the worsening state of our society)?
(186.71 KB 336x502 Dirlewanger.png)
>>4927 >highly decorated >fought against communists after WWI >fought in the Spanish Civil War >helped criminals find employment during the tough times of the war >BTFO jews >ruthless towards the enemy Yeah I'm thinking he's based.
>>4937 Sir, your CV lists your main skills as >"Rape, molestation, and buggery" Your employment history only has gaps for the periods where you were out of jail. And your Alma Mater is an infamous Brothel. You are exactly the kind of man we need.
(713.07 KB 1999x1934 dirlewanger 2.png)
>>4943 >You are exactly the kind of man we need. Jawohl
The jackoffs who are promoting DOTR or even ethnoglobe are either fedposting or really out of touch with how the world really works. We don't have the public support that would be needed to successfully overthrow the government or anything like that. It's a pipe dream. They're trying to suppress us by associating us with terrorism so that they can (((shut it down))).
>>4288 (wasted dubs) >Christians are fundamentally leftists and proto-Marxists. If so, why is it that Christians in the West have traditionally been conservative and right-wing? We need to get the support of the majority of Whites behind us. And that would require us to cooperate with Christians instead of turning on a group of people who are, by some measures, the best expression of the White race on Earth.
>>5027 I disagree on DOTR, but I do think that ethnoglobe is a bit far-fetched in my mind, as well as unnecessary. I would ask you though what you think the actual solution is - democracy is useless. It is trying to come to power by playing by the jews rules. We're set up to fail from the very beginning. This is why these fascist parties all over Europe never get any votes. It's by design. >>5029 I'm being a bit hyperbolic when I described Christians as 'leftists'. When I say this I am talking mainly about some specific facets of the Christian worldview - particularly slave morality. Slave morality is fundamental to the Christian worldview and the leftist worldview that Christianity spawned. 1 Corinthians 1:27-29, etc. Christianity was the form of proto-leftism that was pushed 2,000 years ago. It's going to look conservative to people today who are following the newest versions or mutant ideologies unleashed by our enemies. When one really picks apart the Abrahamic worldview these things can be seen though. Ultimately Christianity is at odds with Nature, White survival, the truth and the pagan worldview in displaced. >We need to get the support of the majority of Whites behind us. And that would require us to cooperate with Christians instead of turning on a group of people who are, by some measures, the best expression of the White race on Earth. Being enslaved to the beliefs of the masses is not how you lead a movement that wishes to reshape society. Christians should be tolerated so long as they don't wish to divert the goals of White Nationalism. They should be kept very far from leadership as well, but they might have a use. The next Hitler is going to be called the anti-Christ by dumb Christcucks, I can guarantee it.
>>2797 To add to this post of yours. The reason why men are attracted to girls down to 12-14, is because they are attracted to what the future holds in that girl. You're 100% correct. Girls are most fertile and best prepared for pregnancy when they are women. Age 19-27. But they already show how genetically successful they will be at that age by 12-14. That's where the nuance is.
>>5027 You haven't been paying attention conservacucks have tried to play their rules and lost since 1945. If you think jews will let us legitimately get votes so that we can get into power you are mistaken, look at Greece, Finland, Russia, even America now. The media jews who fake news control democracy, control the votes to a massive extent. Don't be gullible. You think jews are ever going to stop defaming literally everyone who disagree with them and their cancer genocide politics? They will not, you could be a PETA animal rights activist with no criminal record and they could twist you into being a "terrorist" , "nazi" its happened to a lot of people, even milquetoast conservacucks who seemingly align with ZOG. And if you think this is a "blackpill" post it is not, it's the reality and we are in a war for our futures against sick evi; sadistic jews and their sycophants who are literally destroying it. That's why Everyone White are justified in taking their nations back from this scum by any means availible and if you think or want this to be peaceful which means compromise to jews/playing their game you are not radical enough have not prepared your mind to be ready to fight for freedom which means killing and terrorizing them until they stop killing us by proxy of shitskin hordes.
>>5037 There might also be the angle that besides girls becoming fertile at that particular age, they are also unshaped by any other man than their father or potentially brothers. Women adapt to men they are attracted to, and the less worn out and shaped by others they are, the easier it is to marry and shape a good wife and mother. Today too many young women have their heads filled with garbage during this crucial age and are turned into little cultural Marxists and are groomed to be whores.
>>4909 Just realized I've made a ton of errors on this post and will never stay up late at night again. >>4921 It only makes sense to be harsh especially in this age. Mankind would rather entertain themselves with wasteful pleasures and be influenced by degenerates than to learn and act on improving themselves and their blood 24/7. If being harsh is what it takes to improve the race, then it must be done. The Greeks and Romans were not afraid to reduce their own kin to slavery or "freemen" if they did strayed away from being proper citizens/kinsmen. >>4926 >>4928 >No arguments >MGTOW tier faggotry No surprise you type of niggers don't have anything intelligent to say. Do us eugenicists a favor and not birth any children, okay? We don't need any more mutts. >>4931 >They should be married before that or they are likely already ruined by that age This doesn't make sense, if she goes off to fuck some other dude then that's the patriarch's fault. A woman can maintain her chastity even if she grows to 25. 16-18 year olds are literally the best for pregnancy.
>>5046 >This doesn't make sense Earlier marriages are better for a whole host of reasons. 18 year olds are of course of a good age, no one can argue against this in their right mind. The thing is in the modern society they are often ruined by the time they are in their late teens or early twenties. Maybe this would not be so in a society that controlled the influences and gave patriarchs back their natural rights. This is a very broad statement though - not all women are ruined. There are good women out there.
>>5047 >Earlier marriages are better for a whole host of reasons. I agree with this, but it would still be best for pregnancy for women to start at the age of 16. > The thing is in the modern society they are often ruined by the time they are in their late teens or early twenties Not necessarily, most late teens and early twenties females in this age are not having sex at all. As matter of fact most young adults for American and European Millennials to Gen Z are mostly virgins, both male and female. Even in our hypersex world people are afraid of having sex and would rather masturbate. >Maybe this would not be so in a society that controlled the influences and gave patriarchs back their natural rights. It wouldn't, because I know most males would not like to see their own daughters becoming sluts or having sex without them knowing. One of the reasons why so many women get away with this is due the anti-social and individualistic cultures that has prevented most parents from keeping a close eye on their children and punishing them for having sex without their acknowledgement, particularly the father doing the watching. Even Asians get this right, despite being less active and social.
>>5049 >I agree with this, but it would still be best for pregnancy for women to start at the age of 16. I have no problem with this stance. I have heard or read somewhere that this is when a woman's body becomes best suited for pregnancy. >Not necessarily, most late teens and early twenties females in this age are not having sex at all. As matter of fact most young adults for American and European Millennials to Gen Z are mostly virgins, both male and female. Even in our hypersex world people are afraid of having sex and would rather masturbate. Are virginity rates rising for females as well? I know it is rising for men, obviously, we've all seen the studies. Admittedly I have not looked into the numbers for them. If this is true this is a small Whitepill for those who want to find good quality virgin women. Maybe I am just surrounded by degenerate women. Most of the girls I knew growing up turned into total whores, unfortunately. >One of the reasons why so many women get away with this is due the anti-social and individualistic cultures that has prevented most parents from keeping a close eye on their children and punishing them for having sex without their acknowledgement, particularly the father doing the watching. Yeah I can imagine that if the media brainwashing was shut off for a generation or two, and families actually being allowed to discipline, shame or punish their children, that this would problem would largely self-correct. This is a good thing about many of the things that we hold. The jews are doing unnatural reprogramming of the population. It's doable, sure, but it's an uphill battle. We are wanting to work with what is natural to people, it's like rolling a rock down a hill when the jews are slowly trying to push one up the hill. Same with homosexuals and trannies really. The only reason this is allowed to fly in families today (barring total brainwashing) is that you'll get shamed or arrested when you try to stop your son from being a faggot.
>>5046 >No surprise you type of niggers don't have anything intelligent to say Sticking to the ZOG approved age which is killing us is the retarded nigger stance, luckily you've already backpedaled and I have no need to post anything "intelligent".
>>5051 >Are virginity rates rising for females as well? >According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the average age Americans lose their virginities (defined here as vaginal sexual intercourse) is 17.1 for both men and women. The CDC also reports that virgins make up 12.3 percent of females and 14.3 percent of males aged 20 to 24. That number drops below 5 percent for both male and female virgins aged 25 to 29 and goes as low as 0.3 percent for virgins aged 40 to 44. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/03/on-late-in-life-virginity-loss/284412/ >More and more young people are abstaining. No less than 27 percent of 15- to 24-year-old men have never had any form of sexual contact (oral, vaginal, or anal) with another person, up from 22 percent in 2002. Meanwhile, 29 percent of females in that age bracket have never had sex, also up from 22 percent at the time of the last study. https://www.livescience.com/13072-sex-stats-virgins-rise.html Both males and females are largely becoming virgins on equal rates. Sodomites will be the only ones having most of the sex in the future, but I think they rising in virgins as well. Although it seems that most males and females non-virgins have had sex with their current partners that they've been with for at least a couple of months, But I could be wrong. >The only reason this is allowed to fly in families today (barring total brainwashing) is that you'll get shamed or arrested when you try to stop your son from being a faggot. It's also, because boomers unironically thought that it was better for women to be in control of the family over the father. You can blame them for bring this retarded mindset into 21st century men as well. Women no longer hit on men and praise their virginity, because boomers had and still have shitty theories on sex and how women are only interested in you if you talk to them first. >>5054 >Sticking to the ZOG approved age which is killing us is the retarded nigger stance ZOG also enjoys fucking children who are barely old enough to know what sex even is, age marrying and breeding to a certain age is killing White race. I'm not sticking to le ZOG's age restriction laws nor their bullshit about marriage or "age of consent" I'm talking about creating an environment and society for healthy and happy children and people who are fit for parenting. I'm still waiting for that argument. You can't disagree that women are better off birthing children at least the age of 16 and no longer than 28 years.
>>5056 Hmm, interesting. Thanks for the links. If that's true (and I don't have much reason to doubt it) then things aren't quite as bad as I had thought they are. It's possible that Internet hyperbole is getting to my head a bit in this area. Not to say things are good though, they're quite obviously not, needless to say. I'm in my early twenties myself so I will be slightly more Whitepilled when looking for a woman eventually.
>>5056 Again, you already revised to 16 after being corrected, what is left? Would you like me to point out that if we were truly interested in racial survival we'd be pulling a Rape of Sabine on Christian middle schools? Muh studies are for those with a dulled instinct, and your initial post indicated yours was very dull indeed.
>>5059 >Again, you already revised to 16 after being corrected No I didn't I've said at least 16 and made a mistake in my previous post to include "at least" because I'm tired and forgetting a-lot of words to make myself more clear, but I prefer it to be 18 due to studies I've read. >Would you like me to point out that if we were truly interested in racial survival we'd be pulling a Rape of Sabine on Christian middle schools? Are you pretending to be retarded? We ain't Romanz n shiet nor facing a similar issue as bad as they did. The Romans kidnapped females, because they lacked them it was necessary for them to do so, otherwise they cease to exist and never birth a great nation. Reducing women to breeding status is one thing, but defending impregnating a 12 year kid and claiming that it is necessary for racial survival even though there are over millions of young and stable older White women in the world is not the same thing nor is it needed. You don't need to attack a Christian Middle School to save the White you race dumb kike, as matter of fact your mentality is both cum-brain tier and you sound like a kike with the thought as well. >Muh studies are for those with a dulled instincts Ah, so I guess the truth and understanding a better way to breed a strong race does not matter to you? Just simply saving Whites even it means it will lead to the inferior offsprings who turn gay and fuck niggers? When you prove that you have experiences and knowledge and understand what it means to save a race, then maybe I'll consider you a source of information. Sure not all studies are true, but to say that all studies do not matter or are false is retarded. >and your initial post indicated yours was very dull indeed. Or you're coping and don't have a way to argue. Again sterilize yourself.
>>5060 >The average White woman peaks around 18 which is their best age for beauty and pregnancy at the same time. This was your original post, goldfish. As for the rest, realizing the immediate need of getting White girls out of the system once they reach the age of promiscuity before they are corrupted to the point of being unfit to be mothers regardless of biological functions is a subject too radical for you, which I don't care to explain since you'll forget it anyway.
>>5029 >If so, why is it that Christians in the West have traditionally been conservative and right-wing? They have been "conservative" which as has been established since the time of Arminius if not before is just dumb niggers who support the status quo, no matter what the cost is, and the cost in America and the entire European world, has been the slow and accelerating death of Whites and the draining of Whites to benefit niggers and all other non-Whites mostly due to christianity and it's egalitarian core. What is right wing besides being supportive of monarchy or Free market economics? nmothing one need only take a look at the Conservatives in America over the last 80 years or so and they can't even hold off the onslaught of the gays and they are the christian party and always were going back even before the civil war which that party caused. >We need to get the support of the majority of Whites behind us. And that would require us to cooperate with Christians instead of turning on a group of people who are, by some measures, the best expression of the White race on Earth. We do not need majority support for anything, revolution occur ONE way, a visionary leads the best of the best to completely uproot a society and change it to fit his vision, we lack that visionary right now. WE DO NOT NEED NUMBERS, WE NEED QUALITY, PURE AND SIMPLE. We cannot cooperate with christians on any front, not if you're holding yourself to the truth and being honest with yourself, AT EVERY TURN THEY HAVE BETRAYED THIS CAUSE, FROM HITLER AND MUSSOLINI ON DOWN TO THIS VERY DAY, THERE ARE NO MORE CHANCES FOR THIS JEWISH CREED AND IT"S MORONIC FOLLOWERS. Under no circumstances is anybody who is not a National Socialist " the best expression of the White Race", and we aren't here for the White race, we are here for the Aryan/Nordic/Germanic Race, that is it, no more, no less.
>>5027 >The jackoffs who are promoting DOTR or even ethnoglobe are either fedposting or really out of touch with how the world really works. We don't have the public support that would be needed to successfully overthrow the government or anything like that. It's a pipe dream. They're trying to suppress us by associating us with terrorism so that they can (((shut it down))). There is only one solution to our problem, only one, period. that solution is ENDLESS UNADULTERATED CEASELESS VIOLENCE AGAINST OUR ENEMIES, WHICH ARE OF EVERY RACE, MANY ARE EVEN OF THE WHITE RACE, we can only begin to apply this solution when the grip of the system is to weak to stop us. This is caused by us committing various acts of terror to force the system to act, and over extend it's resources, until it breaks or you can snap it yourself. if you find that people who are willing to do this have a few dreams they wish to reach for even if they're excessive or unworkable in any short term scenario, it doesn't matter. Quit countersignaling it doesn't help anything.
>>5060 >No I didn't I've said at least 16, Women should be married by at least 14, this is a policy Hitler even supported, and evidence of that has been posted on past iterations of /fascist/. >Are you pretending to be retarded? Are you? our situation is that desparate, the majority of the White race alive today is not of birthing age, it is of Old age, a good 50% at least is over 50, in nearly every western nation. >Ah, so I guess the truth and understanding a better way to breed a strong race does not matter to you? It is you the truth does not matter to, women with extremely rare exception must be put under the authority of their father until they are married, their husband once they are married and their sons if they outlive their husbands, the best way to facilitate this to get them married as early as possible, for the greatest level of stability for any potential offspring, and for the happiness and health of the marriage. the best policy is a 14 minimum, before a state authority should get involved. >Or you're coping and don't have a way to argue. Again sterilize yourself <4cuck lingo Get out, and only come back when you understand what Truth is.
>>5059 > Would you like me to point out that if we were truly interested in racial survival we'd be pulling a Rape of Sabine on Christian middle schools? Lel >>5060 >We ain't Romanz n shiet nor facing a similar issue as bad as they did. The Romans kidnapped females, because they lacked them it was necessary for them to do so, otherwise they cease to exist and never birth a great nation. Reducing women to breeding status is one thing, but defending impregnating a 12 year kid and claiming that it is necessary for racial survival even though there are over millions of young and stable older White women in the world is not the same thing nor is it needed. One thing I will note about the other anon's post is that he says nothing about impregnation. You can certainly marry someone without immediately impregnating them. I think what he says would only really have any sort of reality or justification to it in the event of a hot race war. >>5064 > Women should be married by at least 14, this is a policy Hitler even supported, and evidence of that has been posted on past iterations of /fascist/. Yup, that's exactly what Hitler said, He also supported the same thing for men, and believed that the state and community should support the young couple. Maybe I will have to write up a post on this if it comes to it, since this has came up time and again. Might make a good screencap.
>>>5061 Didn't I just say that I made mistake on my wording? Can you also read that part as well or are you just going to keep low IQ points? >As for the rest, realizing the immediate need of getting White girls out of the system once they reach the age of promiscuity before they are corrupted to the point of being unfit lol nothing I said was against this notion, but cool. Also you're not going to get White girls to become pozzed by going to a Middle School and le raping them. I'm convinced the faggots here are all talk and no action. >>5064 > Women should be married by at least 14, this is a policy Hitler even supported I love you accidentally exposed yourself. I never said anything about marriage for sex isn't about marriage. I only talked of impregnation and agreed with anon that it is best for children who are young to get married as soon as possible while stating that it is best for developed teens to get pregnant. Do you see marriage and sex or do you see it as a union? >Are you? our situation is that desparate, the majority of the White race alive today is not of birthing age, it is of Old age, a good 50% at least is over 50, in nearly every western nation. [citation needed] The White race isn't even blow 50 million inhabitants and there are still millions of Whites who are over 16 years old who are ready to birth children. There's no desperation, this is you being schizio. >It is you the truth does not matter to, women with extremely rare exception must be put under the authority of their father until they are married, their husband once they are married and their sons if they outlive their husbands, the best way to facilitate this to get them married as early as possible, for the greatest level of stability for any potential offspring, and for the happiness and health of the marriage Lmao I literally said all of this and yet you're saying that I don't understand truth. I never said anything against you fucking nigger, I specifically stated this in my previous post that you clearly didn't give a shit fully reading. >4cuck lingo Hey retard are you going to also complain about the redditfrogs and other lingos that originate from cuckchan across the board as well? I love how cuckchan lingo is acceptable until here is an agreement. >the best policy is a 14 minimum, before a state authority should get involved. No it isn't, this is literally you being thirsty for child pussy. We don't need anyone under 14 for impregnation you stupid kike and you've yet to give an actual reason why other than nonsense. Fucking A the absolute state of this introverted board. >>5071 >One thing I will note about the other anon's post is that he says nothing about impregnation. The Rape of Sabine was all about impregnating women by kidnapping them. I'm convinced that this is a fucking samefag, because how does three retards mistook that I said anything about marriage when I clearly didn't.
>>5085 >how does three retards mistook that I said anything about marriage when I clearly didn't. People clearly see impregnation as best tied to marriage in this thread. It is a natural assumption to make, especially in overcoming the current degenerate paradigm. > this is literally you being thirsty for child pussy 14 year olds are not children.
(2.27 MB 378x478 bitch.mp4)
>>5071 >You can certainly marry someone without immediately impregnating them. Bingo, and anyone who automatically jumps to "y-you just want to fuck children" immediately outs themselves as unqualified to talk about the topic by putting their ignorance of history and saturation in the status quo on display. It is a nuanced subject and retards cannot into it. Anyway, the point is women need to be attached to a man, their first and only man, and controlled by that man, as soon as possible, and get them the fuck out of modern schools and away from their "peers" who will just introduce them to porn and tumblr, or you will end up with video related even after you pump some kids into them. Anyone not home schooling at this point doesn't deserve to keep their kid because they are just completely fucking up, full stop. And we will at some point have to take action in this direction, so get used to the idea.
>>5106 >that video Disgusting. This, folks, is why domestic discipline was a thing. Women are children and will act like it if you allow them to. Feminism is just the process of continuously inflating women’s egos to insane proportions.
>>5085 >I love you accidentally exposed yourself. Exposed myself how? Marriage and sex are inseparable, sex should ideally only be had within a marriage, this is true of Aryan beliefs stemming back to the Vedas, iterated in literally every society we have ever had, I do not separate the two, nor should anyone else, You can whine and argue about fertility all you want but menses are happening earlier and earlier probably thanks to the insane levels of Xenoestrogens in our air and water thanks to our extreme overuse of plastics, this isn't going to change much for the next few thousand years, though nutrition may have a more immediate impact on when it occurs. >Do you see marriage and sex blah I see Marriage and sex as a union, marriage is literally a contract for a woman to provide sex and raise children going back to very ancient days, predating christcuckery and probably even the vedas, the view of these as separate is modern and like most of the ills in our society stems back to christcuckery and it's many and varied bastard children. >The White race isn't even blow 50 million inhabitants blah blah you're a schizo Disregarding your jewish medicalization of my position. Tell me what percentage of the US is pure White European Americans? No statistics exist which show the number removing the jews Arabs and North Africans and many many more which are put in those statistics, that do not belong in that category, the standard of 70% or so includes Hispanics, the actual number is less than 50% of the population. The average age of an Adult in this category is 58 years old, per pew research, go search, look for yourself. >Lmao I literally said all of this and yet you're saying that I don't understand truth. Not the post I responded to, and even if so, I don't care you still are not here for the truth or you would know our situation is far more desperate than it may appear. >No it isn't, this is literally you being thirsty for child pussy. Projection, the age of consent TO MARRY, in every western nation was far lower than it is today less than 150 years ago, it was 8 in Delaware until the 1990s and raising it was driven by Christian feminists, some of whom were ethnically jewish, but most were not. >We don't need anyone under 14 for impregnation you stupid kike and you've yet to give an actual reason why other than nonsense. Who said anything about Impregnation under 14? NOBODY. >Fucking A the absolute state of this introverted board. I have a wife, a job in the trades, at which I have several friends whom I talk to and hangout with outside of work, but yes I am an introvert, totally
(334.18 KB 697x724 ClipboardImage.png)
READ THE LAWS OF MANU
>>4340 >How come you don't see it that our worldview is factually elaborate, steady and mature enough to discuss many different problems Yes, so many different problems are being discussed except those problems get ignored after a few posts in favor of going back to bashing christianity. >without melting down like literally every other ideological group? Please. Rifts like Strasserism and other strains of ideological revisionism continue to infest whatever is left of the fascist movement, which just shows in the end where their loyalties lie. The same way how the strasserites sought division, and continue to do so, while the National Socialists desperately tried to promote a united front. So why does the fascist movement need to be split over pointless shit again? >All I see are people who believe in Yaweh complaining and no one else. Because it has no effect to them? They are not directly affected by these low quality posters, so they have no reason to speak up. >I've not heard one compelling argument from abrahamists (i mean christians but i want to use nonsensical terms to lump you in with kikes and muslims) as to why exactly we need the Bible. We don't. It is just one of Europe's religions that majority of the religious Whites follow. >christianity teaches fucking none of our core organic ethnic values How so? >quite opposite it teaches egalitarian marxism How can you have Marxism without Marx? "Greeks and Roman can go to heaven" is not some secret code for "everyone is the same". >censorship where intelligent people and early visionaries, thinkers and inventors were not appreciated as in the past but often tortured and murdered at a pyre for literally not "respecting" some strange volcano god. See:Galileo Galilei who was inches close to being murdered by christcucks. Most of the time, you'll see that the so called visionaries/thinkers/inventors were killed/ almost killed for political reasons, rather than religious ones. For example, Galileo was nearly killed because he not only asserted that the sun was the center of the universe, but he made the mistake of claiming the church endorsed his views. Such a move was catastrophic, especially during the Protestant crisis. >Martin Luther had already shown what the desert religion was really about in 1510. He was ignored when he actually proved it was a philosemitic scam by investigating the talmud/torah when being tasked to write the new testament finding out what jews really wrote about nonjews in the "real old testament" and told no one in the new cult about. The Talmud is not the "real old testament", this is a garbage take. >For this finding especially christcuck catholic jew world order (((elites))) at the time reacted violently attacked him for simply telling the truth about jews, how harmful they were and were ready to murder him so he had stage a kidnapping and hide as a knight. Luther's anti-semitism was not a motivation for him being hunted down by the Church. In fact, most of the Church would agree. jewish blood rituals and attempted control over the monetary system of Europe's kingdoms had done its work, and the general opinion of jews went from the naive "our brothers in the bible" to "disgusting heretical vermin". >But when Christianity's pitfalls become evident is for example evident in the enlightenment age beginning in 1620 where White people realized they had to rethink because theocracy was clearly a miserable Theocracies in Europe were very uncommon. >and so we gave up focusing so much on dark ages causing christianity. Christianity never caused the "dark ages" & the dark ages did not halt scientific progress to a halt, or reduce it. >But when Christianity's pitfalls become evident is for example evident in the enlightenment age beginning in 1620 where White people realized they had to rethink because theocracy was clearly a miserable, and so we gave up focusing so much on dark ages causing christianity and again like 'pagans' not being bound to insane rules and focusing on trying to understand our real circumstance; Nature, again, which was sparked by people like Francis Bacon who wrote Novum Organum(true directions concerning the interpretation of nature). Only there is where we found our success. Only then were most amazing inventions and feats made again. Christianity always followed the natural order
>>5559 >How so? First we need to define what 'organic ethnic values' are for sake of clarity. I will assume that the anon you are replying to will largely agree with what I say, but he can put in his piece if he disagrees, I guess. 'Organic' in this context is referring to the idea of an organic society, i.e. a hierarchical and organized society with a division of labor and different roles working together harmoniously. The individuals within such a society are more akin to cells in an organism than they are atomized individuals. This is the idea of both the Fascist state and the traditional Dharmic conception of the state. 'Ethnic' is self explanatory. A homogenous group able to preserve itself against threats internal and external. The values in question will be those that are compatible with the two terms that I defined above. The question here is whether Christianity bolsters these organic ethnic values or whether, in its purest forms, it is detrimental to these. First, we see Jesus preaching in Matthew 10:34-38 that this teachings will disrupt the family unit, the most fundamental building block of all societies. This is hardly compatible with organic ethnic values. Indeed, the whole Sermon on the Mount, if followed, would lead to the destruction of society, as it commends the meek and says that they shall inherit the earth (Matthew 5:4), that evil should not be resisted (Matthew 5:39), that you should give in to those stronger than you and give them more than they were demanding (Matthew 5:40), that we should love our enemies (Matthew 5:43-44). Things on Earth don't matter. Jesus tells you to store up treasures in heaven, not on Earth (Matthew 6:19-21). You shouldn't even plan for the future (Matthew 6:25-34). Before one attempts to say that 'he didn't really mean it', they should realize that Jesus told his followers to be more righteous than the Pharisees (Matthew 5:20). Many Christians throughout history have read these commands literally, especially in the early Church. One must be glad that the Romans co-opted Christianity in a sense, because they diluted it, and threw out the garbage, but only in order to oppress Europe and to spread this religion of meekness and weakness all across Europe. Even still the values of the Bible, which are a morality of slaves commanded by a nigger-loving, weakness loving God (1 Corinthians 1:27-29, Galatians 3:28), continued to infect the people of Europe, and has grown even worse as time as passed, as literarcy has risen and the words of the Bible have been read firsthand. To summarize, Christianity teaches the following: >the meek and weak are chosen by God >that planning for the future is bad >that you should turn against your family >that you should store up treasures in heaven, not on earth >that you should be a doormat cuck A complete 180 from what the Semitic war-god was demanding of the jews in the Old Testament. None of this is compatible with the desire for an organic ethnic society or its values. Interestingly many of the same criticisms here have been repeated quite independently of anti-Christian pagans online by Japanese critics of Christianity from the Tokugawa period. >How can you have Marxism without Marx? Marxism was hardly invented by Marx, when one really looks deep into the roots of it. It is just an atheistic, materialistic rendering of the common Abrahamic scheme. It still teaches conflict between classes within society, slave morality, the idea of progress, a great utopia to come, etc. >"Greeks and Roman can go to heaven" is not some secret code for "everyone is the same". That's not what it says though. It literally says that 'There is neither jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.' They are not part of an organic, flesh and blood ethnic society, but rather they have defected into a mystical body of 'Christ'. It is a sort of spiritual civic nationalism. Paul even uses this same organic terminology in referring to the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 12:12-27). Paul says the Christians are ONE BODY, all limbs of Christ. <And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you. <Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary: <And those members of the body, which we think to be less honourable, upon these we bestow more abundant honour; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness. <That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another. Translated: Niggers are part of you, all are necessary, all are brothers!
>>5559 >Christianity always followed the natural order Forgot to address this. This is quite obviously false. The Christian worldview is precisely an inversion of the Natural Order as understood in almost every single culture on the planet prior to Abrahamization, Aryan and non-Aryan alike. The fact that Christianity prioritizes membership in some mystical body of Christ over the flesh and blood of one's own kin is a great example of why it is in total conflict with the Natural Order. The Aryan view of Nature is infinitely superior, and would not stand for any of this garbage. Reading the works of these ancient men, we read that the organic society was integral to the pagan worldview, that racial hierarchy was indeed recognized, and the community had a purpose. Abrahamism has always been a factor in the spread of individualism and other poisonous ideologies, believe it or not. On the whole it is a life-hating doctrine in conflict with Nature's Laws, and therefore the real God, who is not a jew or a volcano deity.
(475.56 KB 998x1635 DoD Deradicalization.png)
(237.29 KB 1058x1512 1621966855205.jpg)
>>5142 > We don't have the public support that would be needed to successfully overthrow the government or anything like that. It's a pipe dream. They're trying to suppress us by associating us with terrorism so that they can (((shut it down))). Demoralization lies. It is fight or die for our race. The cattle have proven that they do not care, by submitting to the sterilization shot. >>5030 Ethnoglobe is not far fetched. It is the actualization of the 14 words. For as long as our racial enemies exist, they will always be a threat to us. Miscegenation destroyed Rome, Persia, Sumer and Ancient Egypt. China, India and non-White countries are destroying the planet that we live on, poisoning the land and the oceans which we depend on. Ethnoglobe is a matter of NECESSITY if we want to continue to exist. There is hundreds of reasons, for example. Non-Whites are causing a mass extinction of marine life in the oceans, what this means is MASS STARVATION for White countries, as it creates a cascading effect that effects all life on earth. >>5030 The Christian slave morality is the crucial centrepiece to the current destruction of our civilization through jewish subversion. If christianity never existed, our folk would rightfully recognize that niggers are not "humanity", are not "souls", are not "brothers in the lord", but sub-human beasts that should be dealt with the same way as eradicating mosquitoes. >>5039 >>5047 Very true unfortunately. I had ashamedly high amount of sexual parters at age 16, that was long before I was red pilled though. >>5060 >We ain't Romanz n shiet nor facing a similar issue as bad as they did. We are facing a much worse and dire situation than they did. Our people are being genocided, not only by the invaders but also by sterilization. The populations of all White countries are falling dramatically. Within 5 years, America's population will be reduced to 100million through deaths from the vaccine which will be attributed to other causes or COVID, meaning that more people will take the poison injection. Rome never ever faced a population collapse this bad, this quickly, and this gigantic. You must only think of one word when strategising for our future. PRAGMATIC The jews have won for so many hundreds of years because they are pragmatic about their strategy. They call this the Begin Doctrine, which means to protect Israel at all costs, nothing held back etc. We need to be pragmatic about our survival as a race, that means securing reproduction at all costs no matter what. We cannot afford to lose this war. We cannot let our people become extinct just to pander to a moral system that our enemies never play by the rules.
>>4927 >>4937 >>4945 Esoteric Dirlewangerism when?
>>5597 Does anyone have an archive link to that deagel page? All old links I've found to it lead to the site's homepage and it seems their insane population forecasts have been removed.
>>5604 https://web.archive.org/web/20210416204712if_/https://deagel.com/forecast >>5601 >Esoteric Dirlewangerism when? Now. Dirlewanger was clearly the fullest manifestation of what Savitri Devi would call 'Lightning' traits. No mercy for his enemies, doing whatever he had the power to do. The ultimate redpill is that he did nothing wrong. If the entire Wehrmacht was full of men like that who had no qualms about crushing and exterminating the enemy the war would have been won.
>>5610 Every instance of ruthlessness toward one's enemy kvetched about by modern lemmings was par for the course pre-Enlightenment.
>>5623 This definitely seems to be true to an extent. For whatever reason (linked with slave morality, of course) violence has been consistently and hypocritically demonized in modernity, used by people to virtue signal. The irony is of course that modernity is far more violent and dehumanizing than anything that has ever existed in the past, and can kill larger numbers of people extremely efficiently. I'm sure they know this, but they ignore it for propaganda reasons.
>>4437 You're a kike and cumbrain degenerate. Stop coming on here to soley be a faggot.
>>8127 Where is this from?
>>8132 The pic is from cuckchan. The book is "The SS-Sonderkommando "Dirlewanger": A Memoir" by Rolf Michaelis, but I couldn't find a pdf.
>>3152 >>3154 > Loki shapeshifting to justify transgenderism The meaning of the myth can be explainend. https://thuleanperspective.com/2020/06/26/gender-homosexuality-in-norse-culture/
>>3152 Using the example of Loki or any other form of shapeshifting deity is just retarded to justify transgenderism. It's like claiming that Athena was promoting transgenderism in the Odyssey when she shapeshifted into Mentes and later Mentor in order to order to speak to Telemachus and to accompany him on his search for information about his father.
>>8155 How retarded is man to compare himself to the Gods? May they be struck down for their ignorance.
>>8160 From what I can see, the Kali Yuga literally turns people retarded. Ragnarok can't come soon enough.
>>9773 >Homosexuality/Bisexuality is not unnatural Define unnatural
>>9776 >>9773 Homosexuality is an abomination. From the design of the bodies of the two sexes alone it is clear that one was intended for the other, and that the species would perish without this. Homosexuality is also a breeding ground for STDs, AIDS (or more accurately GRIDS) and other sex-related diseases. Foul practices and homosexuality come hand-in-hand due to the filthy nature of homosexual intercourse. Homosexuality is a sure sign that one is morally degenerated and has damaged instincts that lead them to incorrect targets for their lust. It is like how certain flies that lay their eggs on corpses are attracted to certain plants like the dead horse arum lily and try to lay eggs on them because they smell like rotting flesh. A very apt comparison with sodomites.
>>9773 >homosexuality/bisexuality is not unnatural Stop reading right here. I don't care what Yukio Mishima said, because he isn't a god or some great saint who upholds all truth. He was a man and simply was wrong and a degenerate sodomite, despite my respect for him as a person, his bravery, and his books. >>9776 >natural homosexuality I already knew that Evola said something as dumb as this and some of the other disagreeable and outright incorrect things he has said in his books as well. Homosexuality is unnatural and a sign of decadence of uncontrollable lust. Man was made to mate with women and vice-versa for the female and we can clearly see this with all species who have two different sexes. Just because it has happened for years does not mean it is natural and should be common today. A monkey raping another monkey does not mean that nature is in favor of male rape or merely the out of context of two males kissing each other is also acceptable and totally normal behavior even though it is known that chimps are naturally foolish creatures who masturbate and throw their feces everywhere as immature joke and lack of discipline. To further prove that it is unacceptable to be gey is the account of the Greeks banning and arresting anyone who bedded with their same sex and ruined purity of both their mind and spirit. I'm guessing you're either a shill, a troll, or just confused.
>>9779 >I'm guessing you're either a shill, a troll, or just confused. Bingo. The lengthy quotes basically prove that this is just shilling, as if the quoting of people like Evola or Mishima means that we automatically approve of their words. Mishima was a great writer and did some great things, but he was also a degenerate in some areas. This is undeniable. You are also correct about Evola. He makes many mistakes in his books, though he also offers good insights in other places. Faggots need bogged. This is what is truly trad.
>>9776 >Carl Gustav Jung You do realize that around the time he wrote this, Switzerland was a very liberal country along with the rest of Western Europe, right? Even religious christians took part in being and becoming secular overtime and ceased to practice the traditional views of what the bible encouraged and Western laws instituted. Thus you've seen a-lot of tolerance and gays due to nullification or removal of anti-sodomite laws that were implemented all over Europe until the 1700s to 1900s. All Institutions become areligious or went with research without with regards to religions during the 19th and 20th century as they completely negated tradition and conservative values. Most of what he said were only things he thought in regards to homosexuals based on one-sided perspectives and not understanding their true nature of how they are naive and love to undermine family and nation, two things Jung supported. Like anon said about Mishima-senpai and Evola, they are only men who have thoughts and opinions that can be corrected and proven wrong.
>>9773 >>9779 >implying Confessions of a Mask is autobiographical
(68.70 KB 588x368 ClipboardImage.png)
>>9790 You're definitely right that it's not strictly biographical. It has biographical elements but anyone reading it as a factual autobiography is seriously mistaken. Even with the homosexuality issue aside, I have seen far too many people try to tell me that Mishima was a LARPer and a coward for faking sickness to get out of fighting for his country in WWII, as is depicted in Confessions of a Mask, but in reality he even wrote his last will and testament but failed the physical exam, as Andrew Rankin shows in his recent book on Mishima - >>567. And of course Mishima would later say that he wished he had died in the war. It was clear to me from reading the book that Mishima was exaggerating and changing a lot of things in order to make an interesting story. It's sort of analogous with The Temple of the Golden Pavilion as far as I'm concerned. It is based on a grain of true (crazed monk burns down temple in Kyoto), but the story Mishima built around it is a story of its own, and people would have to be dumb to take it as 1:1 with reality.
>>9773 >>9776 These quotes are interesting and all, but none of them are solid arguments nor analysis of why homosexuality is natural. Even if it was something common throughout all of history and society it still goes against both nationalism and fascism, so there is no reason for us to accept sodomy.
>>9792 Is it considered sodomy if you're doing anal intercourse with a woman? Sorry for the blind question.
(10.88 KB 1109x164 ClipboardImage.png)
>>9813 Yes it's sodomy 100%. Why would anyone want a shit-covered dick when God/Nature literally DESIGNED a hole to squeeze the cum out of your dick in the most pleasurable way possible literally 1cm next to the asshole you so covet?
>>9813 Yup, the laws of manu and Vedas makes it clear that sex was meant for the opposite sexes and procreation. A man's penis is meant to penetrate only the vagina and nowhere else. Anal is degeneracy created out of lust. Some argue that it is actually a demonic sex ritual.
>>9816 This pretty much sums it up. It is interesting that you mention the demonic angle, because it would definitely fit within the the Vedic stuff that you mention. This sort of unnatural sexual activity is highly tamasic (i.e. degenerate, materialistic, dull, lethargic). Demons are basically hyper-tamasic psychopaths. The fact that Aleister Crowley did stuff like try to summon demons in sex magick rituals incorporating homsexuality and anal is very telling.
>>9820 >Synarchist Flag Holy shit are you that spic way back in anoncafe?
>>9820 >but what about homosexuals/effeminates who never engaged in any physical acts at all? Please don't tell me that you actually believe this. >fall of the fascist regime >WIllhelm It's just typical Christians being stupid and cucking out, because fascists wanted to do things differently in regards to tradition and how a state should function and not hop on LARPs. Wilhelm disliked Hitler, because he refused to become some type of Catholic monarchist. His criticism are hypocritical and are based on nothing factual. >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achilles_and_Patroclus >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Band_of_Thebes Achilles wasn't gay that's a misinterpretation done by liberals on purpose. If you read Homer's Iliad that does not come from modern sources, none of the words said portrays Achilles' relationship with Patroclus nor Hector were sexual, but it was brotherly love. Libshits just cannot comprehend that two males can share a bedroom together and not be gay. The Sacred Band of Thebes has no evidence of sodom other than an Anglo pedophile making such claims. >Aren't the laws of manu(manu smirti) considered forgery Nothing of the Manu was forgery.
>>9773 >>9776 FUCKOFF F A G G O T >>9820 >but what about homosexuals/effeminates LITERALLY KILL YOURSELF TRANYY SPIC FAGGOT YOU LITERALLY EAT SHIT WHY IS THIS SHITEATINGCOCKSUCKINGNIGGERLOVER EVEN ALLOWED TO FUCKING POST >>9821 >Holy shit are you that spic way back in anoncafe? >Spic appears >Gay posts appear OF FUCKING COURSE
I tend to do effeminate shit like biting my nails, sitting down to pee or appreciating how a man looks (since they need to work out to produce the results). Thing is I don't want homosexuality to take over the world. Just because I do slightly effeminate stuff, does this mean I'm gay? Even though I've been attracted to women. If it is considered bad, what can I do? >inb4 kys
>>9821 This can't be synarchrist anon, because I don't remember him ever defending homosexuality. Or am I wrong? >>9829 >Just because I do slightly effeminate stuff, does this mean I'm gay? Do you think the effeminate things you do are normal and acceptable behavior?
>>9830 I would say the answer should generally be no. However if I have never had sexual relations with another man, then am I committing any crime whatsoever? My little actions circle back to me.
>>9829 >inb4 kys Actually do us all a favour and proceed to do so. >>9830 >This can't be synarchrist anon, because I don't remember him ever defending homosexuality. Or am I wrong? That sinaloan spic nigger literally admitted that he was into fascism because of aesthetics first rather than theory or a desire to preserve his non-existent race. He's literally no different than strasserite trannies that LARP as fascists because of their obsession with bright colours, obscure symbols and useless theory. It wouldn't surprise me that he defends faggotry, like how he defended the degenerate mishimaa literal shitskin or his tranime addiction. He probably spends his days swallowing and filling his asshole with negro semen, links related. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/mexican-state-sinaloa-approves-same-sex-marriage-2021-06-15/ https://www.proceso.com.mx/nacional/estados/2021/6/15/congreso-de-sinaloa-autoriza-los-matrimonios-gay-265973.html
>>9831 Grow some Ts and stop acting like a fag.
>>9831 >I would say the answer should generally be no. Then don't do it. If you acknowledge they are bad behaviors, then you should not do them at all. >However if I have never had sexual relations with another man, then am I committing any crime whatsoever? Is this another way of admitting that you're gay? Yes, you are committing a crime, specifically crimes against your spirit as you allow your mind to be corrupt and impure. Don't be gay or effeminate at all. Learn on how to be a man and grow some Ts.
>>9837 >>9835 I think the two of you need to understand and learn that not all people can be salvaged, it's sometimes better to simply ignore these posts and report them as they break the board rules on degeneracy. How many precious hours of your day will you waste conversing with literal homosexuals, when you could have spent it doing something more productive. Like reading a book or excercising.
>>9834 You type like a faggot.
>>9830 >This can't be synarchrist anon, because I don't remember him ever defending homosexuality. Or am I wrong? Almost every Synarchist to have ever lived is either gay or effeminate. That anon on /fascist/ was just a pseudo-intellectual who didn't really support third position politics.
>all these /pol/tards trying to drive synarchist anon away again
if i post anime girls, my post has weight. whoa.
>>9852 He isn't a high-IQ poster, he's just some dude who plays pretend in being intelligent. We don't want him anymore, because he's a faggot and retard and always was one. It's no surprise that he's an effeminate faggot as well.
Anyone thinking that this guy who was shilling for sodomy ITT is the Synarchist anon doesn’t know his typing style at all. His style included strange types, use of quotes like «this» and other tell-tale signs of Mexicans like ¿?. The fag ITT is a troll, and I’m glad he is now b& for spreading his degeneracy in this thread under the guise of unpopular opinions. Someone putting on a flag doesn’t make them a particular poster who hasn’t been here in over a year now.
>period of constant Christfag shilling >period of recent Nazbol shilling >sudden wave of degenerate homosexual apologism These are one person, I’m almost sure >constant peppering of concern troll posts about if it’s okay if they racemixed once or masturbated to XYZ This might be a legitimate autismo or a shill, hard to tell. Either way it’s cancer. Thank God the faggot ITT was removed.
>>9863 >These are one person, I’m almost sure Probably (((CREST employees))) larping to annoy, reminder to be vigilant.
>>9883 They hate being called out like this, so I expect them to pop up again here soon. I have noticed that they haven't released any imageboard studies since Neinchan and /fascist/ discovered them. The shill wave after that and the suddenly convenient removal of the report was very telling.
>>9863 >legitimate autismo >a shill >faggot Integralist anon?
>>9968 Nothing would surprise me at this point.
(65.91 KB 600x651 nietzsche braindead.jpg)
Nietzsche is a third-rate philosopher and offers almost nothing of value to Fascists. His sort of thought was refuted by Plato and others millennia ago.
>>10059 Still, his ubermensch theory is valuable, and most here respect him for his anti-christianity.
>>10059 Nietschze offers more to value than anyone on this board. He insipired and debately fascism, and National Socialism. This is just a shit (((take))).
>>10112 What did Nietzsche offer? Atheism? Rejection of moral realism? A failed life where he couldn’t even live his values? Pathologizing all worldviews through his perspectivism? Into the trash he goes. Fascism and National Socialism in truth stand against everything he preached. Nietzsche hated political parties, hated his own people and nation to the extent that he LARPed as a Pole, hated any form of community or the values that hold it together (but muh slave morality), and doesn’t even offer a coherent philosophical system, in fact he rejects them all. He is an abortion of a ‘philosopher’ compared with actual Aryans of value who lived historically. National Socialism and Fascism owe far more to Giovanni Gentile, Hegel, Plato and others than they do Nietzsche. The only accurate thing the man did was diagnose Christianity and leftists. >>10110 >Übermensch Thinly-veiled transhumanist nonsense
>>9883 I missed that one, what is CREST? A new name for the JIDF? >>10115 >...and doesn’t even offer a coherent philosophical system... In the absence of an omnipresent authority(god), men must be moral themselves to be civilized and reach new heights. How is that not a coherent philosophical system?
>>10115 >What did Nietzsche offer? Atheism Rejection of moral realism Nietzchze was not an atheist and his attack was on modern morality, and how it was another way to turn everyone into brain-dead cattle. We talked about the problem with moralities before and now you're here sounding like the Christcucks do when they complain about Nietschze and the rejection of what is considered to be "moral". >Pathologizing all worldviews through his perspectivism? Have you ever read a single book from Nietschze or this just you bitching and complaining that he wasn't a LARPing trad? >Fascism and National Socialism in truth stand against everything he preached. Fascism and National Socialism were inspired by his most of the things he preached, now you're just making stuff up. The idea of ubermensch, slave-morality, race artisocraticism, etc that the NS and Italian Fascist were fond of were all inspired by him. >Nietzsche hated political parties, LOL, is this a bad thing? I mean even I can understand his hatred of them, because they were all the same back then and today. National Socialism isn't merely a politcal party or ideaology, it's a religion of itself. >hated his own people He was a retard for this, but that doesn't negate his philiosphy at all. >and doesn’t even offer a coherent philosophical system Retard statement. >Ubermensch is trans-humanist Ubermensch isn't trans-humanist.
>>10120 >Nietzchze was not an atheist Ecce Homo, 'Why I Am So Clever' §1 <"God", "immortality of the soul", "redemption", "beyond"­ without exception, concepts to which I never devoted any atten­tion, or time; not even as a child. Perhaps I have never been child­ like enough for them? <"I do not by any means know atheism as a result; even less as an event: it is a matter of course with me, from instinct. I am too inquisitive, too questionable, too exuberant to stand for any gross answer. God is a gross answer, an indelicacy against us thinkers — at bottom merely a gross prohibition for us: you shall not think!" The Gay Science §344 <But you will have gathered what I am driving at, namely, that it is still a metaphysical faith upon which our faith in science rests — that even we seekers after knowledge today, we godless anti-metaphysicians still take our fire, too, from the flame lit by a faith that is thousands of years old, that Christian faith which was also the faith of Plato, that God is the truth, that truth is divine. (The Gay Science §344) He was clearly an atheist, even if he was *NOT* a Richard Dawkins type of atheist. >his attack was on modern morality, and how it was another way to turn everyone into brain-dead cattle. He did attack this most vehemently, I don't deny this. >We talked about the problem with moralities before and now you're here sounding like the Christcucks do when they complain about Nietschze and the rejection of what is considered to be "moral". Believing that such a thing as moral realism exists (which Nietzsche denied) does not mean I agree with a stinky Jewish book, needless to say. >Have you ever read a single book from Nietschze? Yes. Have you even heard of his perspectivism? Nietzsche clearly describes morality as an interpretation of certain phenomenon, and he is clear to say that this is invariably a misinterpretation. It is a sort of symptomalogy. Nietzsche is clear that life itself forces us to establish values, and when people speak of values, they are speaking under the inspiration of the sort of life they live - Nietzsche here later inspires all sorts of (((psychoanalysists))) who use these sorts of ideas to reduce every conviction to psychological states and nothing else. Nietzsche says that all philosophers are spokesmen for their prejudices, and that every great philosophy is no more than a personal confession of its author and an unintended personal memoir. Though Nietzsche of course denies moral facts, don't get me wrong - he does distinguish between healthy morality and anti-natural morality. How you respond to this paragraph will be extremely telling when it comes to the question of whether you have truly read Nietzsche or not, because I can assure you that I can directly quote the here to support every single statement I say here. >LARPing trad A telling statement.
(1.76 MB 1241x8770 crest.png)
(187.51 KB 1128x658 new page edit crest.PNG)
>>10118 >I missed that one, what is CREST? A new name for the JIDF? CREST is the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. They are based in the UK and are funded by the UK government to research online activity by the 'far-right' and Islamists. Pic related is how we (/fascist/ and Neinchan) discovered them. Tellingly, as soon as anons began to post about CREST and dig into the people behind them we got hit by a massive wave of shilling and gay-ops. The page for the first image I attached on 'mIning the chans' went down too. They quite literally shut it down. >In the absence of an omnipresent authority(god), men must be moral themselves to be civilized and reach new heights. How is that not a coherent philosophical system? The thing is, Nietzsche denies moral facts of all kinds, for reasons discussed in the big paragraph in this post >>10131 starting with 'yes'. Some people will (and do) deny this here, but there is abundant evidence in support of it that I will most likely having to post again before long ITT. The real question is whether the idea of an Ubermensch 'creating new values' or whatever the fuck he said is even compelling, or worthwhile. We don't need new values, we need old ones, but Nietzsche has already trashed worthy pre-Abrahamic philosophers as 'Christians' and 'degenerates'
>>10131 You only quoted what a book is claim to have said, but no direct sources nor pages. Are you retarded. Even if what you said is true, it doesn't negate any of the philosophy that Hitler and Mussolini were insipired by at all. >Believing that such a thing as moral realism exists (which Nietzsche denied) does not mean I agree with a stinky Jewish book, needless to say. Can you prove to me that moral realism exists? Because no even the OG Dharmist believed in such a thing. As matter of fact, the only people I've seen to believe in it are Christcucks, which I'm guessing you are. >Nietzsche is clear that life itself forces us to establish values, and when people speak of values, they are speaking under the inspiration of the sort of life they live This is true, are you denying that the Romans and Greeks never done anything similar at all, fascism greatest inspiratiors? >Nietzsche says that all philosophers are spokesmen for their prejudices, and that every great philosophy is no more than a personal confession of its author and an unintended personal memoir. Somewhat true in a way. We can see this with Marx and Socrates for example. >Though Nietzsche of course denies moral facts What is a moral fact? How can something that seeks to control and make you think a certain way, factual? >A telling statement. Ah, but it is true, because I've only seen trads complain about Nietschze, the same normalcattle who unironically believe that society and civilization will go their way if they only listen to mouths of moralfaggers and slave-moralists who tell you to not use your left-hand, because paganism, or that sex is bad.
(164.83 KB 1512x577 ClipboardImage.png)
(129.50 KB 1419x648 ClipboardImage.png)
>>10140 >You only quoted what a book is claim to have said, but no direct sources nor pages I gave you the exact section numbers and work that he wrote these things in, they are easily findable online. I've links to the both below and attached images of the passages since the wording is slightly different in this translation I'm linking: Ecce Homo https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52190/52190-h/52190-h.htm The Gay Science https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52881/52881-h/52881-h.htm >Can you prove to me that moral realism exists? Because no even the OG Dharmist believed in such a thing. Now you are just talking out of your ass. Dharma literally means 'Natural Law', and Natural Law is not some dry, scientific laws of a materialistic universe, it is a divine moral order. In Zoroastrianism this is why we have the Truth / Asha opposed to the Lie / Druj. The Laws of Manu are literally a codification of divine laws, and the entire work begins with the process of creation and the ordination of the cosmic order. In the works of Plato, namely Timaeus and Phaedo, we hear talk of unvirtuous men become subhumans and animals when they are reborn, and the virtuous man is received into the host of gods. Even in Hesiod we can read that Zeus is enforcing a moral order on mankind and punishes them for injustices and degeneracy. All of Neoplatonic philosophy, which is the highest form of European pagan insight into the divine and nature of reality, talks about the return of the soul to the form of the Good, or the One. All things seek the One and the Good in their dealings, and the One is the material, formal, efficient and final cause of all reality. Dharma, in truth, is no more than the One in its function of the final cause (the purpose of goal, which results in harmonization and eventual reconciliation with itself for the soul. >As matter of fact, the only people I've seen to believe in it are Christcucks This is absurd. >which I'm guessing you are. Don't try to pull this shit again, if I say I don't worship some Jewish carpenter, I don't worship a Jewish carpenter. I take what you say on face-value, and you have no reason not to do the same for me. >This is true, are you denying that the Romans and Greeks never done anything similar at all, fascism greatest inspiratiors? So you believe that they weren't fighting for the truth and were instead just interpreting and operating off of their psychological dispositions? Wew >What is a moral fact? How can something that seeks to control and make you think a certain way, factual? An objective moral fact is a proposition which concerns the 'rightness' or 'wrongness' of some action or outcome, which is true regardless of the opinions of individuals, or whether people vote on it, or anything. For example if it is a moral fact that 'homosexuality is wrong', then regardless of whether it is legalized, or popularized in the opinion of the masses through propaganda, it will remain wrong. The natural question is what these moral facts are grounded in, and this of course must be a divine source. The Euthypro dilemma is avoided because traditionally the Source has been identified with the Good itself, which is expressed in Natural Law / Dharma.
Is morality totally wrong, from what I'm getting here?
>>10141 >So you believe that they weren't fighting for the truth and were instead just interpreting and operating off of their psychological dispositions? When have the Romans and Greeks ever fought for truth?
>>10059 >Nietzsche is a third-rate philosopher and offers almost nothing of value to Fascists. His sort of thought was refuted by Plato and others millennia ago Ah so you're a faggot. I'm not going to stop reading Nietzsche and taken a-lot of his great ideas that Hitler saw, because of personal problems out of him. Plato is old and outdated who unironically thought Socrates was the smartest man in Greece.
(132.71 KB 1007x452 ClipboardImage.png)
(13.74 KB 1176x130 ClipboardImage.png)
>>10150 I guess I made you so mad that you had to respond to me two days in a row, or did you mess up your IP hop attempt?
(310.00 KB 680x1024 1426621795031.jpg)
>>10146 When they worshiped Mithra & Pallas (Athena).
>>10146 Romans and Greeks, like every ancient people, were religious fanatics by modern standards who built their entire society around worshiping the gods and winning their favor. There was no secularism. Anyone who has read Herodotus, Thucydides, or other accounts would be aware of this. The fact that these people believed that there was a cosmic moral order and a world filled with gods and spirits who gave protection and punished wrongdoers and injustices is proof enough that they tried to be on the side of the truth, and we can even see them sacrificing to the gods of the Roman state prior to clashes on the battlefield and attempting to use divination to discover the gods' will. They absolutely were concerned about these things It's not surprising to see people like Cicero, who was a Roman consul, senator and philosopher, stating the following: <so that you may be the readier to defend the Constitution, know this: for all who have preserved their fatherland, furthered it, enriched it, there is in heaven a sure and allotted abode, where they may enjoy an immortality of happiness. <For nothing happens in the world more pleasing to that supreme Deity, who governs all the universe, than those gatherings and unions of men allied by common laws, which are called states. From this place do their rulers and guardians set out, and to this place do they return." <Exercise this soul in the noblest activities. Now the noblest are cares and exertions for our country's welfare. And the soul which has been enlivened and trained by these will speed more fleetly to this its resting-place and home. And this will it do more readily if, even while still imprisoned in the body it strains beyond it, and, surveying that which lies outside it, as much as possible, endeavours to withdraw itself from the body. http://people.reed.edu/~wieting/mathematics537/Dream.pdf
(196.06 KB 518x617 ClipboardImage.png)
(126.57 KB 517x409 ClipboardImage.png)
>>10155 Mithra is a giga-chad god
>>10152 >IP-hop I just logged into my computer, now I'm going to insult you for being a massive retard.
>>10159 Also cool that you have no arguments for why I should stop liking Nietschze.
>>10160 >>10159 Your IP hop evidently failed, since like I said you responded to my first post twice over two days because you were so butthurt over it. It should be exceedingly evident why you shouldn't like Nietzsche, and this has already been discussed in detail, try reading the thread instead of sperging out.
>>10161 I read your thread and still sucks ass, tell me why I shouldn't listen to Nietschze outside of your retarded LARP and ignorant assumption of spiritual faggotry?
(31.82 KB 500x396 pepe resisting laugh.jpg)
>>10162 >and ignorant assumption of spiritual faggotry? If you are a materialist you should just kill yourself at this point
>>9861 Your boyfriend is fag, dilate harder troon.
I believe that Covid 19 vaccines are most likely safe for the following reasons: Israel has been sucking billions of dollars out of the US and the rest of the West for years. As a result of this they have very advanced levels of (medical) technology. Due to historical, economical, genetic and cultural reasons there have also always been a disproportionate amount of Jewish doctors. Jews are extremely ethnocentric. The result of this is that, unlike Western governments, the Israeli government is benevolent towards its (Jewish) population. If there were any significant risks to these vaccines, the Israeli government would have discovered them, and would not have administered these vaccines to it's own population. There are also plenty other governments in the world that do not adhere to western liberalism and are relatively benevolent towards their people, who have also administered these vaccines to their respective populations. The entire "vaccination agenda" also does not add into the anti-White agenda at, as non-Whites have received priority for vaccinations. Lastly, as I see it, the anti-vaccine rhetoric is a knee-jerk reaction to the mainstream media. >the media says A, therefore the answer is B It stems from mostly cuckservatives and cuckservative-adjacent WN's (like the dailystormer). They do this on every single issue, and as a result they are wrong on multiple issues. For instance: >the media supports environmentalism, therefore we oppose it >the media supports various forms of social policy (health care, subsidized education, etc), therefore we oppose it. They are often typical low IQ bible-thumpers who cannot distinguish adaptive policies from non-adaptive policies and just oppose everything the government does. A lot of them are lolbergs or lolberg-adjacent. They believe, for instance, that even if a certain virus (not necessarily Covid) is deadly, the government does not have the right to implement lockdowns, which is completely retarded. Lockdowns have been a thing for centuries and every responsible government has utilized them.
(1.21 MB 2360x1407 covid kill list.png)
(210.98 KB 609x591 jew vaccines impfung.jpeg)
>>10316 > the Israeli government would have discovered them, and would not have administered these vaccines to it's own population. This is based on the assumption that Jews are getting the same stuff as the rest of the world. Since we have even seen articles from mainstream outlets about politicians in Germany getting their own vaccines, it's not too wild of a jump to assume that entire groups could get this, especially when the vaccine production, whether we are talking about Pfizer or Moderna, or even the Russian vaccines, are disproportionately under the influence of Jews. To say that the vaccines are safe too is to ignorant the growing amount of evidence that many people are getting very sick from the vaccines immediately after taking it. This is not just hearsay from the Internet either, because even anecdotally I have heard from normalfags that they have gotten bad reactions from the vax. This is experimental technology that is being forced onto the populations of almost every country on the planet. Given the fact that Covid is not even deadly in the slightest, and especially given the fact that the vaccines clearly don't even work by their own admission, it is worth asking why the fuck they are still shilling for everyone to be vaxxed so hard. And then there is the fact that numerous presidents have been literally killed or have had attempts on their life for not playing along with the Covid narrative. One or two is a coincidence, three or more is a clear pattern. There is a growing Covid kill list. Covid is a complete hoax, and it's very much worth asking why they want us to take their experimental vaccines with horrible side-effects that have been made by Jews when they themselves had admitted that they don't work, yet they still want you to get it...because reasons. Over 20,000 people have died in America alone from the vaccines already, and that is not to even take into account the data that is being fudged to hide the true numbers, and the people who don't even report the case, and all of the people in every country on the planet. There are probably hundreds of thousands of people have who died from the vax already. I don't know what it's end-goal is, but you'd have to be dumb to take the vaccine.
>>10316 >they are [x] or [x]-adjacent twice >they are things I don't like >ergo they are wrong You're too obvious.
>>10156 <so that you may be the readier to defend the Constitution, know this: for all who have preserved their fatherland, furthered it, enriched it, there is in heaven a sure and allotted abode, where they may enjoy an immortality of happiness. <For nothing happens in the world more pleasing to that supreme Deity, who governs all the universe, than those gatherings and unions of men allied by common laws, which are called states. From this place do their rulers and guardians set out, and to this place do they return." The trads on this board, then, should be careful to avoid the pitfalls of tradcaths, who make themselves enemies to political order / politics in general. As Cicero himself says, that a healthy body-politic is considered pleasing to the supreme Deity and that unions of men and the state held a very cherished role. The Church itself, being a building in the City / Polis, benefits from healthy politics, so it isn't only priests we should idolize. >Now the noblest are cares and exertions for our country's welfare. And again, advancing the political interest is so controversial to tradcaths, b/c they juxtaposed the Church to the Body-Politic, that like other traditionalists, they only revered men who wore priestly cloth, and not noble people who cared for their country and wanted a healthy body-politic... Calling anyone who is involved with the state to be a "secularist", even Kings and Emperors, and statesmen, whereas here you see that this is pleasing and good to nature to have political unity and not tear it apart through denominational shitflinging. You see, how the political interests need to come first, in certain instances, and not at all contrary to any Deity to build and cherish the political... These political institutions for the Romans were considered almost in a similar religious light, and paramount to them. >Plato himself is for a Divine Power assisting in Human Politics... 'tis a remarkable passage that of his in his Meno. "We may properly call Governours, or Statesmen, Divine, as we call those who give out the Oracles, or Prophets or Poets by that name; and we may affirm, that they have a Divine Illumination, and are possessed by the Deity, when they consult for the good of the Commonwealth." -William Nichols
(7.79 MB 7000x3850 Part 7 fixed.jpg)
(7.70 MB 7000x3850 part 8 fixed.jpg)
>>10326 I made a mistake, in criticizing NRx, by stating that they were only concerned for economical (which, maybe, is still true, but the opposite of the political orientation). The absolutists agreed with Plato, that there was no difference between a small state and great household. A king, politician/dictator, and household ruler (like a father) held the same expertise. (Whereas Aristotle mentions, they had different ends and relationships), but ultimately the absolutist view agreed with Plato... So how could you say, that you are pro-family, if you are against the political good? If the people became a great family, seeing as how there is no difference between a small state and great household from this point of view?
>>10320 Yes, lolbergs and conservatives are wrong.
>>10326 Very good post. Christians have trouble understanding what our ancestors understood with ease, namely that politics and the spiritual are not separate, but instead they form an inseparable unity. The divine order above is imitated from below. As above, so below. This is merely common sense as far as I am concerned. The New Testament oversteps in its repeated condemnations of all things 'worldly', to the extent that literally nothing seems to matter except for the beyond. This is contrary to common sense, as well as the wisdom of our ancestors and even other Abrahamic religions, surprisingly enough, all of which (esp. Islam) incorporate a political dimension into their religious traditions. The Aryan traditions encompassed all, envisioning society as an organic entity with different functions all working together harmoniously. The purpose of the king is to enforce the Natural Law on society and to deal with day-to-day political / temporal matters. The priests are in charge of sacrifices and spiritual matters of importance. TL;DR - Pagan theocracy now
(928.75 KB 1378x1378 Grace n Erika.png)
>>10328 >>10326 And a small correction: political & economical matter to an absolutist, seeing no difference, or that they are conjoined here. As Robert Filmer states, "Suarez proceeds, and tells us that 'in process of time Adam had complete economical power'. I know not what he means by this complete economical power, nor how or in what it doth really and essentially differ from political. If Adam did or might exercise family the same jurisdiction which a King doth now in a commonweal, then the kinds of power are NOT distinct. And though they may receive an accidental difference by the amplitude of extent of the bounds of the one beyond the other, yet since the like difference is also found in political estates, it follows that economical and political power differ no otherwise than a little commonweal differs from a great one. Next, saith Suarez, 'community did not begin at the creation of Adam'. It is true, because he had nobody to communicate with. Yet community did presently follow his creation, and that by his will alone; for it was in his power only, who was lord of all, to appoint what his sons should have in proper and what in common. So propriety and community of goods did follow originally from him, and it is the duty of a Father to provide as well for the common good of his children as for their particular." -Robert Filmer "Aristotle gives the lie to Plato, and those that say that political economical societies are all one, and do not differ specie, but only multitude et paucitate, as if there was no difference between a great house and little city.' All the arguments i find he brings against them is this: 'The community of man and wife differs from the community of master and servant, because they have several ends. The intention of nature, by conjunction of male and female, is generation. But the scope of master and servant is only preservation, so that a wife and a servant are by nature distinguished. Because nature does not work like the cutlers at Delphos, for she makes but one thing for one use.' If we allow this argument to be sound, nothing doth follow but only this, that conjugal and despotical communities do differ. But this is no consequence that therefore economical and political societies do the like. For, though it prove a family to consist of two distinct communities, yet it follows not that a family and a commonwealth are distinct, because, well in the commonwealth as in the family, both these communities are found." What he means, by both communities, I think, is that Romans had the Pater Familias doctrine, really, the basis for the absolutist view, since the father had the power of life and death, so the monarch should have this pre-eminence like the whole in relation to a part. Roman servants/slaves were buried with the Roman family, and the Roman state also had slaves, so that's why he says these communities were found in both... which, btw, the absolutists didn't support slavery, and saw it as potentially dangerous for a state (like the Spartacus revolts / criminals coming from slavery such as pirates). "That objection is vain, because I have already declared, That the family is a little City." -Hobbes
>>10319 Also assuming anyone gives a fuck about those retarded jews that spend their whole day banging their head against a wall of an ancient Roman fort.
>>10332 >Also assuming anyone gives a fuck about those retarded jews that spend their whole day banging their head against a wall of an ancient Roman fort. Kek, this. I can't imagine the average rabbi caring for the masses of Jews that much. We have to remember that these rabbis think they are literally more intelligent and wise than their own God. The Talmud has stories where a wise rabbi literally out-pilpuls Yahweh, if I am recalling correctly. It's no surprise they view the average Jew as a step above goyim.
>>10330 <the king is to enforce the Natural Law on society and to deal with day-to-day political / temporal matters. The priests are in charge of sacrifices and spiritual matters of importance. Take what this anon said >>4003 >Control the church and you control the Christian perspective. >Positive Christianity was done to reconcile National Socialist thought with the German Protestant Church. >>3950 >Fascism and NatSoc will never work with Christcuckery. Christcucks strongly believe in being spiritually Semitic and cucking themselves for all eternity for organizations that don't care about them and only wanted to mind control their useful idiots who. The NSDAP failed to work with the Catholics despite, most fascists across Europe being Catholic and the Western Axis Power collaborating with the Vatican State. The NSDAP failed to work with the Lutherans who didn't want their churches to be absorbed and integrated by the Reich to create a single unified church, so everyone could hold the same beliefs and ideals in compatibility and unity of the NatSoc government. I'm concerned about this dilemma. You don't want the antagonism between a political orientation and spiritual. It greatly hinders and creates political dishevel when they are against the political inclinations of a state, but also political authorities finding that they should opt to disregard the spiritual altogether. This is how the rise of secularism began, when after religious dishevel, it was apparent that political order had to take over, and so bad that secularism became inevitable. So I was saying, that even the Roman assembly, was a sacred space, and that consuls and the ceremonies, also have a great significance. And that the Pontifex maximus was also held by Augustus. If you enter certain tradcath circles, you'll find that not only are they against secularism, but they also blurt out against political order & having a state in general. Some even align with anarchists, some ancaps, and others flirt with doing that, because they miss a time when the Church substituted these political matters, but also in contempt of it. (And also lambast Protestants for national churches, etc, other issues). This tension goes back to the Investiture Controversy between the Emperor & Pope, and King Henry II & Thomas Becket, and John of Salisbury, who raised fears of another Julian the Apostate or anti-christ.
>>10328 >>10331 >>10338 Aren't you that Monarchist faggot that was banned on anon.cafe for endlessly talking for your Speshul form of Christian Monarchy?
>>4003 >Control the church and you control the Christian perspective. Nope, Natsoc Germany alone disproves this Christains were a continuous source of disunity throughout the war, including assassination attempts on Hitler. >Positive Christianity was done to reconcile National Socialist thought with the German Protestant Church. It succeeded until the war was lost, with most protestant christians supporting the NS cause. Positive christianity had been abandoned by the beginning of the war, it was abundantly clear it wasn't wortking as intended, as it is all it did was pacify some christcucks and most simply ignored it. >To bring over the Christians to accept racial separation, it must be brought about on moral grounds. The moral grounds of christianity do not allow for racial separation. >For example, if more than half of the Papal conclave are sympathetic to our cause, they will elect a Pope with proper ideals, with sufficient justification to ban race-mixing and racial integration. False the Catholic church has never and will never dop this, their actions directly resulted in the creation of the Mestizos of South and Central America, with Isabel I's aid under them they pushed Iberians who were still relatively pure at that time to further sully themselves this cannot be done, better to destroy and raid the archives of the Vatican, than to try and reconcile the Truth of Nat6ional Socialism with the single most anti-White organization of all time bar none. >When the masses hear about it, they too will be more accepting of our position. Nope.
>>10342 A certain thread was deleted, he was never banned.
>Unpopular opinion Jewish girls are cute
>>10354 It's really hard to tell these women apart from a lot of Polish, Lebanese, Serbian, and Russian girls that don't directly have blonde hair.
>>10354 >droopy, dead eyes >hooked nose >dark hair I'll stick with White girls. Many Asian women are more attractive than these Jewesses, even.
>>10354 Oh yeah this is like that "I think they are cute" post from the old /fascist/ about hapas. This is a good thread for subversives to weasle in for sure.
(37.06 KB 450x461 Chosen jewess.jpg)
(62.77 KB 800x600 Chosen.jpg)
(10.51 KB 202x223 ugly jewess.jpg)
>>10354 They're literal goblins.
>>10358 I'm not being fucking subversive just for funposting, nigger.
(115.32 KB 1800x1578 autism.png)
>>10358 >anon posts opinion in unpopular opinion thread >get mad because you disagree Stop being stupid.
>>10354 >thinking this is unpopular There's a Memri meme about this, that I can't find right now, that pretty much sums it up. It goes something like this: >the Devil tries to seduce you by making them all pretty and seductive >but Allah gives them that nose You could argue Jews have evolved to produce attractive women, as they have often used them to subvert their enemies. It's deeply embedded into their mythology too (story of Esther). They also have bigger tits on average, if I'm not mistaken, which is where the Khazar Milkers meme comes from.
(66.85 KB 512x628 hpl.jpg)
>>10367 for got the pic
>>10367 Nah. All women are sexually selected by men to be beautiful. Yes, even aboriginies. If a beautiful jewess can use her looks to seduce and manipulate goy boys then that's purely secondary.
(70.28 KB 640x853 ohs.jpg)
>>10370 Yes, but with Jewesses, the effect is doubled. They are selected by their own men to be attractive, just like any other population. But they're also selected by men of other populations. Basically, if you're going to be a people that fundamentally undermine the very foundation of every civilization, you have to develop ways to avoid the consequences of that as much as possible. Also pic related is an interesting story regarding Jews and the Esther phenomenon talked about here >>10367
(832.93 KB 914x710 wasmannian mimicry jews.png)
>>10368 The Jewish female is definitely used as part of their survival strategy. Statistically it has been reported that European men favor women's breasts over their asses, and accordingly, it is no surprise that Jewesses are known for their large breasts over all, which like you said, is where the Khazar Milkers meme comes from. They seduce weak Aryan men, reproduce with them and give birth to Jewish children, and at the same time, steal Aryan genetics in order to improve their own racial stock and to blend in in European societies. The best way to defend oneself against Jewesses is to be redpilled on the JQ, and to be self-mastered in sexual matters so that they cannot seduce you. >the Devil tries to seduce you by making them all pretty and seductive >but Allah gives them that nose Top kek.
(29.79 KB 600x909 doubt.jpeg)
>>10370 >Yes, even aboriginies If you had said any other race I would not have said anything, but I have never seen an attractive abo in my life.
>>10376 Abo women are selected by Abo men. It's called natural selection. How do you not understand this?
(32.71 KB 430x640 white woman.jpg)
>>10382 White women have been judged by men of all races time and time again to be more desirable and attractive than the women of their own people. Even abo men know that their goblins are inferior to White women. The problem for them is that White women, if they have any class or character at all, don't want anything to do with inferior races (even if they don't intellectualize it like this)
>>10386 >>10376 Two things: 1, beauty standards change. What was hot 700 years ago may be considered less attractive today. 2, not all people have the same selective pressure towards beauty. Obviously a people that live a hard life are going to be less picky about looks even if they do have preferences.
>>10354 I would choose a 300 lb, unvaxxed White woman over these goblins. And this from a man, who under any other circumstance, rejects fat women. She's still more attractive than a non-White broad from the mere fact her genes won't wreck your genetic heritage. Just make sure your sons stay fit. That's it. And if she has blue eyes, blonde hair, and creamy skin, well, it makes up for the fact she's fat. Not ideal but better than bestiality.
>>10403 >Beauty standards change >What was hot 700 years ago may be considered less attractive today. No they did not, beauty standards have only changed until the late modern era. Ancient Greece, Rome, and China viewed that women with proper portions and light-skin were the epitome of feminine beauty, our standards have been that way until the 1990s. Aboriginals can't complain about their fugly females, because it's all they have as far as attractive women.
>>10319 I think that most vaccines are placebos, and the best and brightest of the goyim, regardless of race, gets the vaccine. How I know this is that someone in my family is pregnant and had both pfizer shots prior to conception, but she's a total retard who couldn't even graduate high school. Think about it, to get control over Whites and replace them, you weed out anyone who can express any independent thought or has an IQ above 90. The only thing unusual is that she gained ninety pounds following the vaxx and pregnancy. I don't even understand why my cousin even stays with such a hog at this point, on an unrelated note.
>>10403 >beauty standards change The White Aryan phenotype has always been viewed as objectively more beautiful, and the reason is because it is. The main beauty standards that actually change are secondaries like makeup, clothing, hair-styles and the like. >Obviously a people that live a hard life are going to be less picky about looks even if they do have preferences. Niggers living in the jungle surrounded by fruits and animals to eat should be the epitome of beauty according to this logic with their easy lives, yet they are ugly and dark. Similar examples can be given for many other people who live very hard lives in deserts and mountains and don’t look like goblins. ‘Muh natural selection’ doesn’t explain shit. >>10440 A 300-pound White woman can be worked into shape too with some effort. Completely fixable. Wouldn’t be my first choice though.
>>10443 The 90 pounds is pretty much just from the pregnancy, she's only about ten above the recommended weight gain during pregnancy, which is two pounds per week, if I recall.
>>10444 Not my first choice either. It's just that when you look at how ugly non-White women are, even the low-hanging fruit of our women are light-years beyond any non-White woman I have seen, including the ones in (((hollywood))). That's why racemixing disgusts me so much. Why even bother being pathetic enough to fuck some disgusting, ape-faced shitskin, when even average or below average White women are goddesses compared to such subhumanity like Kikes, slants, and niggers. I look at it from a eugenics standpoint. If a woman has a pear or hourglass body, blonde/red hair, green eyes, and milky White skin, I can forgive a personality/physical flaw like being fat, and I am no simp. That's what I hated about 4cuck's/fit/ board; they would fuck non-White women like Asians/mestizas because they are not fat. If men simply used their brains somewhat in the process of mate selection, we would have no kikes subverting our civilization, as their default shit-coloured skin wouldn't allow Whites to be fooled by their subversive Tom-fuckery. Hell, if we used our brains when selecting mates, Latin America would be as White as America and not infested with mestizos. Our societies would be stronger, healthier, and in a much better state than they are now.
Okay, let's have a try at this too. We are too many on this planet anyway and there are too many idiots who have to be culled, so the Great Reset's implicit depopulation end goal is a boon: Let it happen and then see where we go from there.
>>10358 If you look at these hapa girls with patience, you start to realize they're White with an annoying yet mitigated down syndrome feature that is nevertheless repellent.
>>10330 >The purpose of the king is to enforce the Natural Law on society and to deal with day-to-day political / temporal matters. The priests are in charge of sacrifices and spiritual matters of importance. In exceptional times, the Higher King can be holder of both temporal and spiritual keys. In other times, the seat remains empty and a federation of lesser kings must maintain the cohesion.
(198.85 KB 1034x1200 pentti linkola.jpg)
>>10549 Well if the vax actually is a sterilization agent (I remain agnostic, but it is worth considering), it's already too late for most of the planet, so we will be seeing the depopulation happen anyway if it is going to happen. It's too late for the vaxxed. Most of the population does need to be removed though, one way or another. If they really do kill most of the population, the real question is whether we will be able to escape from the clutches of the Jews after the cull is over. Because they will try to herd the survivors like cattle, make them live in pods, eat bugs, all of that.
(2.76 MB 480x480 hitler video.mp4)
>>10555 >the Higher King can be holder of both temporal and spiritual keys. Yes, such an individual is exceptionally rare, especially in this age, but when one comes, everyone knows, demonic and spiritual in nature and alike. The perfect philosopher king and warrior at the same time. Hitler was most likely the last one we have seen, because it is clear that all of history from 1945 onward is centered on the person of Hitler.
>>10319 >kill list Brandy Vaughn anyone?
>>10549 >We are too many on this planet anyway and there are too many idiots who have to be culled,... We have too many Niggers, Asians and Jews. The world would be in a good state if it was a White World.
>>10604 Maybe if all Whites were spread out across the planet it would be good. We have a lot of surplus human garbage too, though, if one thinks about it.
>>10604 <b-b-but that's like baaaad man. I got some okay non wite friends Some nerve the people have who say something like that. On here too, I've seen.
>>10626 No one has denied that non-White populations are too high, shill. What people have disagreed with are retarded ethnoglobe fantasies.
>>10628 Everytime you post against "ethnoglobe" you out yourself as a traitor to the race, "We must secure the Existence of our people and a future for White children, because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from this earth." The only logical conclusion of doing as those words instruct is the complete or near conplete destruction of all other races on the face of this earth, because so long as any other race exists the White Aryan Woman and her beauty areat threat of being sullied and of disappering. Get your fucking head out of your ass and shut the fuck up.
>>10549 Not a terribly unpopular opinion for /fascist/.
>>10666 >rage-posting shill The logic doesn't even follow in what you say. I'm convinced that ethnoglobe posting is some sort of fed-op. If you can't see how dumb your logical jumps are in your post here, I don't know what to tell you.
>>10668 Have you noticed that a brown ethnoglobe is already being carried out by ZOG right now?
>>10674 I wouldn't call these comparable. The Jews are encouraging and facilitating racial mixture, but fully intend to keep their golems around and to lord over them. The Jews are not going to join the brown masses. They might do away with all of the golems in the distant future though, but that would be a Jewish ethnoglobe, and not a brown ethnoglobe. Also, there are hints in the Old Testament that they will have slaves to serve them in the future.
>>10668 My logical jump is not only obvious, but very simple, you can be convinced that advocating for a complete extermination of Jews, Niggers, Gooks, Chinks, Japs, Mongols, and all the others is a fed op, but the only reason anyone even talks about it, because it is a lofty goal, but not impossible, is because you keep coming around calling it a fed-op, the one behaving like a shill is you. >>10674 Of course he hasn't, he doesn't actually care. >>10675 >Implicitly calling jews White I didn't think you'd show yourself to be even more retarded than you already had, no jew, not even an Ashkenazi is White. Jews are brown, and they hate life and this world so much that they willfully seek to destroy all that is beautiful, especially the Aryan Race. What they are seeking to create is a subhuman ethnoglobe, with no Whites whatsoever, with them just slightly less subhuman enough to rule it.
>>10676 >Implicitly calling jews White You are even dumber than I thought. There are multiple varieties of people, i.e. different races. Jews are different from Asians, who are both different from niggers, who are all different from abos. Of course they're all non-White, just like everyone but Jews are goyim, and how everyone but niggers are non-blacks. Ethnoglobe and the Jewish plan are fundamentally different.
>>10677 No there are two kinds of people, Aryans and Non-Aryans, quibble over the differences between Jews, Niggers, Asians and so on if you wish, they literally don't matter, they will all cease to exist, if you think it can't be done quickly or efficiently or within our liftimes, it would seem you haven't learned your history. Using far more primitive methods than are available now, the Mongols slaughtered 9 or so million under Genghis Khan and that was just in his campaign into the middle east, how many more did his legions kill, of his own people? Or the Chinese? It's just lucky for them that he didn't care about race at all, only his own family, and it's dominance. In short and very simple; longnose tribe brown too, kill all browns for Aryan woman safety, take special care in killing all longnose tribe. Or does that fly over your simple head too?
>>10678 >No there are two kinds of people, Aryans and Non-Aryans You can construe this any sort of way that you want depending on one's perspectives. As I said before, a Jew only sees Jews and goyim. It's literally no different, what you're doing right now. <just kill everyone! Just convert to Judaism.
>>10679 The reasons why I want them all killed differ greatly from jews, and you also seem to forget(despite mentioning it up above) is that jews don't want everyone but them killed they specifically want 1000 slaves for each of them. So it is really not at all simIlar, and Judaism is an anti-life and Anti-Nature creed I am diametrically opposed to that. Continue thinking that being for the extermination of all subhumans is somehow jewish, if you wish, it just shows you to be completely unaware of the Truth, and what it means, and dictates, for us, and our actions in this world.
>>10680 > and you also seem to forget(despite mentioning it up above) is that jews don't want everyone but them killed they specifically want 1000 slaves for each of them. So it is really not at all simIlar, Yeah, that's why the ZOG plan is completely different from ethnoglobe. You see the world in the same dichotomy as goy and Jew, that is why I told you to convert, especially once I show you that Judaism is not 'anti-life' or whatever buzzword you want to use for it. >Judaism is an anti-life and Anti-Nature creed An utterly meme-tier statement, have you even read the Old Testament, or are you just regurgitating some Nietzschean bullshittery? In the OT, the Jew learns that even despite the calamity of the Fall, there is still hope in the future in childbearing (Genesis 3.16, 20). Children are seen as blessings, and it is a blessing from Yahweh to have a fertile wife and many children, and to see one's children's children (Psalm 128). It is a sign of Joseph's blessedness that he is able to see and hold his own great-grandchildren (Genesis 50.23). It is clear in the OT that to perpetuate the nation and one's family was considered a sacred responsibility, and even required special customs to safeguard it (Genesis 38.6-11, Deuteronomy 25.5-10). It's clear that Jews saw it as more than just keeping the family name alive, but rather it was a way in which Yahweh's promises for Israel would be fulfilled. This is why the Jews in the OT even make prayers to Yahweh lamenting how the Israelites have not kept separate from the neighboring tribes, and have race-mixed with them. They 'have mingled the holy race with the peoples around them' (Ezra 9.1-2). Malachi 2.15 says that the Jews belong to Yahweh in body and spirit and that Yahweh seeks 'godly offspring'. They are not permitted to mix with other nations, even (Deuteronomy 7:3) Along with family and nation is a great focus on the land. Yahweh of course promises Abraham's offspring the land of the Canaanites, which is eventually conquered and the promise is fulfilled. All of the promises of Yahweh to the Jews are worldly promises too, seeing as how Yahweh tells the Jews that he will devour and disposess nations (i.e. goyim) before him (Deuteronomy 7:16, Joshua 23:12-14). And then we can't forget the predictions that the Jewish messiah will bring the Jews back to Israel and restore Jerusalem (Isaiah 11:11-2, Jeremiah 23:8, 30:3, Hosea 3:4-5). He will establish a government in Israel that will be the center of world government for both Jews and gentiles (Isaiah 2:2-4, 11:10, 42:1). He will restore the religious court system of Israel and establish Jewish law as the sole law of the land (Jeremiah 33:15). And then let's not forget how it predicets that the nations (goyim) will come to Zion for instructions, and the word of Yahweh shall come forth from Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:3). Kings will pile up their wealth for the Jews (Isaiah 60:3-5). The kings shall serve the Jews and foreigners will rebuild their walls (Isaiah 60:10-11). All who resist will be annihilated (Isaiah 60:12) and humiliated, bowing before the Jews (Isaiah 60:14). The Jew will suck the milk of nations (goyim) (Isaiah 60:16). Foreigners will tend their feels (Isaiah 61:5), and the Jews will be priests over all mankind, just as promised by Yahweh (Deuteronomy 26:17-19) they "will feed on the wealth of nations" (Isaiah 61:6) WHERE ARE THE ANTI-NATURAL IDEAS? WHERE IS JUDAISM ANTI-LIFE? It's almost as if this is a Nietzschean meme phrase with zero actual meaning. Even Schopenhauer defined Judaism along with Islam as 'life-affirming' in constrast to Christianity, and it is undeniable. Funnily enough, the 'otherwordly' spiritual views are far more often found in European (i.e. Aryan) philosophies, long before Judaism was even a thing.
>>10675 >The Jews are encouraging and facilitating racial mixture, but fully intend to keep their golems around and to lord over them. Yes the mixed race that the jews are pushing for globally already exists, it's called latinos. A freak mix of africans, amerindians, europeans, and asians. When the whole world is mixed that is a brown ethnoglobe. You sound more concerned about a hypothetical future White world than the actual brown ethnoglobe happening right now. If the other races are concerned about this hypothetical White ethnoglobe in the future they should make their alliance with European nationalists explicit and repatriate their ethnic brethren to their own lands. If you want to be treated as honorary, act honorary. Flooding our countries with their people to capture land and influence is not honorary. It's an act of war. You can't declare war and cry when you are treated as combatants.
>>10683 Jews are anti-nature and life-denying, because they hate and want to control everything that concerns life. There is nothing life-affirming about dominating nature and fighting for a semitic god who wants to control and overturn everything. It obvious that you probably a mischling or some dumb non-White who likes to illude a fabian tactic that non-Aryans are merely just slaves to the jew, forgetting that the Rigavedic talks of the barbarians that are non-Aryans and how they attempted to nearly erdiated the darker races. Those who are not Aryans and reject nature go hand in hand thus jews, niggers and East Asians always fighting siding and fighting along the kikes in racial struggles. Wanting to eliminate our racial enemy is not Judaic, this you suffering from a lack of brain-cells and being a e-priest LARPer.
>>10692 We all know that the Rigveda describes the conquest of the non-Whites and their cities by the Aryan gods and conquering humans, that is indisputable and something that I would never deny (it's right in the text). One of the names of Indra is Purandara, the destroyer of cities, and it is outright said that he hates swarthy skin. I'm not preaching any sort of 'a place for every race' ideology. Whites have won land by conquest in the past, and may likely do so again in the future if they need to. I don't think there is anything in the Rigveda about total eradication though, and neither is it said that these people were 'anti-Nature' in any way just by virtue of existing. Aryans wanted land, and so they took it with the favor and assistance of the devas, simple as that. And non-Jewish non-Whites are certainly slaves to the Jews at this point in history, I do not see this as any sort of controversial statement. Most of their anti-White measures today involve using social issues and past-resentment from non-Whites to stir up the non-White population, particularly niggers, against White society. They don't really like these people, they're just tools for them. It is incorrect to say that non-Jewish non-Whites are inherently anti-Nature, and if you are going to maintain that, you'd better define exactly what you mean by 'anti-Nature'. And we can find examples of East Asians fighting against Jewry. The obvious example is Japan. >Wanting to eliminate our racial enemy is not Judaic Maybe not, but it's certainly not necessary. Population reduction is. Ethnoglobe is really no more than a LARP and does not contribute any interesting discussion every time it is astroturfed here.
>>10683 <Wah Wah you're a jew >especially once I show you that Judaism is not 'anti-life' or whatever buzzword you want to use for it. All you showed was that Judaism is not Anti-jewish-life, there is, in all creeds, even in Judaism, the predominant creed of the disintegration and degeneration of the world and those who revel in it, some small amount of Dharma/Physis/Natural Order/Orlog must be in it, for it and those who carry it to survive at all. >It's almost as if this is a Nietzschean meme phrase with zero actual meaning. It's almost as if you're that Anti-Nietzsche shill I've personally BTFO'd before and all you did was screech literal bullshit about him his works and how jews have misused them. >Even Schopenhauer defined Judaism along with Islam as 'life-affirming' in constrast to Christianity, and it is undeniable. Life affirming FOR JEWS ALONE you absolute fucking moron, Schopenhauer didn't need to say that for that to be the obvious conclusion of any reading from the Old Testament. >Funnily enough, the 'otherwordly' spiritual views are far more often found in European (i.e. Aryan) philosophies, long before Judaism was even a thing. Buddhism, Akhnaton, and a few of the great Indian religious thinkers who are classed as Men Above Time, are who you are referring to, no? Quit referring to men who are infinitely smarter than you will ever be. Schopenhauer was a midwit and looked up to jews, just like all the Protestant Christcucks did and do to this day, he was absolutely wrong about Judaism being "life-affirming" it is a blueprint to the dominance of Man and Nature. One of those is not inherently negative, We as men always have, and always will aspire to dominance of other men. No man of any sort can dominate nature, master it, by living in accordance with it's will, absolutely, but never dominate it. That false and disgusting idea is the very core of Judaism and and it is Anti-Life to it's core. >>10697 >Maybe not, but it's certainly not necessary. Population reduction is. No it most certainly is necessary, it's like you don't believe in the Gods. If you had even just a little bit of the faith, that you utterly lack, you would shut your fucking mouth and listen to what the Gods are saying, and they are saying to kill all of our racial enemies permanently. Not just because of the threat they are to us that would be too petty, mostly because of the suffering they have caused and are to this day causing Nature because of our stupid, arrogant, and very jewish inspired, mistake of handing these fucking sub-humans our technology, we have made a grievous mistake and it's time for a reset, this earth will burn in heavenly fire as all is made in accord with Dharma. >Ethnoglobe is really no more than a LARP Blah blah, I don't like it therefore it's a LARP. There's a nhoose hanging from the tree to your left, put it around your neck and jump.
>>10666 It's not entirely erroneous but be careful with such absolutisms. For example, you could easily argue that the Whites carrying within themselves the germs of self-destruction too, we have so often proved it and I'm loathe for claiming a Jewish involvement in all of them. A reduction of the non-White population is most needed, definitely. Not that I take much pleasure in it but niggers are wasting Africa, sandniggers don't deserve the oil and Asians have reproduced in too large quantities (Whites too to some degree). How would you do that? A preliminary destruction by war, followed by a forced program of sterilization for the larger civilian populations? And if you're there, if you can enforce such a vast removal of non-White life, why not go all the way through it? Really? If we were to keep around some non-Whites, what would be the acceptable criteria? Intelligence, creativity, honesty, bravery? Should we even bother? >>10668 It is not totally stupid although the planetary regime needed for this would have surely terrified a man like Hitler. However, I think we can all agree that Jews (full or not) must go in toto. >>10677 >Ethnoglobe and the Jewish plan are fundamentally different. Correct but I think what is in the stores for Jews, if they ever complete their Zionist Empire, would really be even weirder, all with the obvious push for a greater bridging of man and machine. I'm more and more convinced that if in a distant future they could convince themselves to go full cyborg while growing limbs and blank cloned slaves, before shifting to being pure machine, they'd do so. They are schizo enough to do want it and do it. Will they still care about the authentic taste of honey if they ever discover that they can trigger this same pleasure by activating a nerve or two in the brain? Their eschatology is fully compatible with that futuristic and cold projection of application of technology as envisioned by the farthest projections of transhumanism.
>>10705 >It's not entirely erroneous but be careful with such absolutisms. For example, you could easily argue that the Whites carrying within themselves the germs of self-destruction too. We do, our poisonous elites prove that, but we are the only race alive today that has the potential to undo what has been done. >we have so often proved it and I'm loathe for claiming a Jewish involvement in all of them. There are many things that are not the jews fault, We hold responsibility as well >How would you do that? A preliminary destruction by war, followed by a forced program of sterilization for the larger civilian populations? If you went to war why would you not just liquidate the "Civilian" populations as well, why waste time and effort and resources creating and performing sterilization procedures, when a bullet or knife to the gut, or whatever method solves the issue that much quicker. >If we were to keep around some non-Whites, what would be the acceptable criteria? there are no acceptable criteria. we should not even bother.
All lifeforms are locked in a ruthless competition for survival and control of resources. In the wilderness, natural balances are established. Predators reproduce less and do not hunt beyond what they need. Parasites are limited by their dependency. Do Whites truly ''need' the whole world? Pros/cons? >>10683 >Judaism is not 'anti-life' or whatever buzzword you want to use for it. Indeed, they are actually extremely pro-(((life))) and much interested in owning the world's wealth. This is also why they've been winning thanks to such realism when Christianity OTOH sold us some kind of pie in the sky, coming all the necessary sermons about giving up all we have. How cohenvenient! >are you just regurgitating some Nietzschean bullshittery? I don't recall Nietzsche ever arguing that the Old Testament was anti-life. Maybe I'm missing something. This said, Jews really hate Nature as the way it is. They fight against it and hate Whites who have reverence for Nature. Jews want to dominate it to the point of reshaping its essence into a mold fit for their peculiar desires.
>>10697 >I don't think there is anything in the Rigveda about total eradication though, and neither is it said that these people were 'anti-Nature' in any way just by virtue of existing Ever heard of reading between the lines? Total eradication was never mentioned, sure. But it's implied. >>10692 >non-Aryans are merely just slaves to the jew They are. That's why I said the battle is Whites vs non-White subhumans in an earlier post. >forgetting that the Rigavedic talks of the barbarians that are non-Aryans and how they attempted to nearly erdiated the darker races. Good, subhumans murdering each other is gonna make it easy on Whites. Another thing is that whatever 999543 said was what the correct path was for a long time. Fucking WLP knew that eventually the world was gonna go to war when the jews were gone. And that Whites will emerge victorious and cover the globe again while they trample on dead bodies of shitskins. I suspect there is/are non-White(s) who come here to slither in and try to act like ethnoglobe iz ebil. To any shitskin using this whole website (or any imageboard) at all, you're giving Whites more reason to exterminate you. You try SO hard to the point where you'd even come to Mongolian basket weaving political boards to convince White men to not kill you. You wanna know why? Deep down you know that you suck and you are weak. You know for a FACT that the White race is your biggest threat in the never ending struggle in this world. So that is why you fucks come here and convince people here that muh non-Whites ain't soooo bad. (look at the Japan thread on /fascist/, jfc) Anons aren't stupid. We're still coming for you shitskins. Oh and of course it will be foreign aid, ending your pathetic lives as mud people. Keep being scared, we don't care :)
>>10709 >Ever heard of reading between the lines? Total eradication was never mentioned, sure. But it's implied. Not really. In the same Vedic text we can also see the famous hymn where the Natural Order emerges from a cosmic man, creating the four orders of humanity (one of which is non-Aryan). There is nothing about eradication in any of these texts, except for destroying their civilization and bringing it under Aryan control. The survivors were subjugated and made slaves of the Aryans. > and try to act like ethnoglobe iz ebil. No one is saying ethnoglobe is 'ebil'. The crux of the matter is essentially what >>10708 is saying - "Do Whites truly ''need' the whole world?". The answer is No. The non-Whites of the world need their numbers thinned desperately. We need to cut off aid and stop providing them with technology. We need to bomb their cities, destroy their crops and send biological weapons into their lands to devour their crops and bring them back down to a level where there is a healthy balance between their Lebensraum and their population. Whites don't need the whole planet, it would be better for us to leave much of the world untouched for the sake of the environment as well. It does Whites no good to live on every inch of the Earth and to populate it. I do not agree with the Abrahamic idea of dominating the entire planet for the sake of a Jewish deity. Long term it's better for Whites to remain within their natural environments too. >>10708 >I don't recall Nietzsche ever arguing that the Old Testament was anti-life. I can't recall anything specific either, honestly. He did call the Jews the biggest purveyor of anti-natural ideas and ideologies, if I am recalling correctly, though. That one is fairly uncontroversial in my mind. Even if we can't find anything truly 'anti-life' in the Old Testament, there is of course the Kabbalah, which cannot be overlooked in these discussions, especially Lurianic Kabbalah, which is all about Tikkun Olam and freeing the lights in order to restore the world to its (((original state))). Mix in the Frankist ideas about redemption through sin and other modern ideas like Reconstructionist Judaism (look this one up for a redpill), and stuff will start to click into place slowly.
>>10713 >No one is saying ethnoglobe is 'ebil'. You literally are saying that by calling it a fed op.. >The crux of the matter is essentially what >>10708 is saying - "Do Whites truly ''need' the whole world?". The answer is No The answer is yes, for the sake of the planet, we will also never use biological weapons that is an incredibly stupid idea and could actually destroy entire ecosystems irrecoverably.
>>10708 Humans are much more like invasive species in their environmental impact, rather than a predator in its natural setting. Races that show no self-control and spread their filth like wildfires should be wiped out for the sake of nature. A Whites-only world is not an issue if the global population regulates itself.
>>10715 >You literally are saying that by calling it a fed op.. I would say that the idea itself is not a fed op (as some predictions about this kind of thing were made in the 19th century, admittedly), but many of the people who actively push it type like feds and 4cuck users. Could be wrong, but I have noticed that there is a high correlation between low-quality posts and ethnoglobe posting. >The answer is yes, for the sake of the planet They only destroy the planet when they are introduced to White technology. If we have trouble using, they just can't use it at all, their countries are full of filth and pollution. This is of course why they need to be culled, a good deal of them. What they do afterwards is up to them, but they won't be getting anywhere without the tech. They'll be harmless. I don't care what some nigger does in the jungle halfway across the planet after we destroy their imported civilization. >we will also never use biological weapons that is an incredibly stupid idea and could actually destroy entire ecosystems irrecoverably. Some forms of limited entomological warfare might be good for destroying crops, or maybe it would be easier just to target them different, burn them out, and destroy supply lines. Spreading diseases might be a good option too.
>>10719 >but many of the people who actively push it type like feds and 4cuck users. Could be wrong, but I have noticed that there is a high correlation between low-quality posts and ethnoglobe posting. No you haven't, as literally every time I see it mentioned, usually in passing and completely unremarkable, I then see you being spergy going "Ethnoglobe is such a fed-op, it's low quality" or "You guys got us banned from anon.cafe" or some variation thereof. You did this even to the effort-posts of Ethnoglobers on Anon.cafe, and probably on julay, but I didn't see it much there, and you have done nothing but bitch about it, and be btfo'd each and every time. Just fucking ignore it already, your autistic reaction wastes more time effort and energy than any TOTAL NIGGER DEATH ETHNOGLOBE NOW poster ever has. >They only destroy the planet when they are introduced to White technology. No they do not, they do it completely independent of White technology. If they didn't already do these things prior to contact with us our technology would not have made them do it any more than a gun makes people kill.\ >This is of course why they need to be culled, a good deal of them. They need to be exterminated to protect nature, first and foremost, not just from them, but from what will reoccur if we do not get rid of them entirely. Second so that what resources they have or live over that we can use, and thirdly so that our women and our children are never under external threat(barring the existence of Extraterrestrials) ever again. >Some forms of limited entomological warfare might be good for destroying crops, or maybe it would be easier just to target them different, burn them out, and destroy supply lines. Spreading diseases might be a good option too. No, manipulating Nature never ends out well, No bioweapons will ever be used whether it's a horde of locusts or fucking Ebola on steroids, both are a dumb fucking idea and will harm more than just t5he niggers or whatever non-Whites are the target, it would absolutely be better to nuke it instead at least then the environ recovers within a few centuries at most,.
>>10721 >>10721 Ethnoglobers were cancer on anon.cafe as well, but they are clearly not what got us kicked off. Any poster who has used this board for some time will know that the gay-ops perpetrated against us on Julay and the Cafe were out of control, and there was a clear agenda to fuck with /fascist/. The post that was emailed to the BO though as an example of the sort of posting the admin was allegedly sick of was an ethnoglobe post, but to me this was clearly just a random post that the admin there pulled out of his ass to cover for something that was going on behind the scenes. Glowies probably forced him to drop it, threatening him somehow or another. Only shills bring up ethnoglobe as the reason we were removed there, just like posters who cry about some spic poster from years ago as well. >No they do not, they do it completely independent of White technology. If they didn't already do these things prior to contact with us our technology would not have made them do it any more than a gun makes people kill. Without Whites importing machinery, factories, building roads and building cities, not to mention giving these apes education, the vast majority of these people would still be living in the jungle. The only exceptions are China and Japan, and maybe the Middle East. And China was literally a third-world country worse off than fucking India before it got a hold of White development and technology (partially due to imperialists meddling there). I don't think they were doing any sort of planet destroying pollution and development though. They weren't industrialized. They didn't have the means. There were likely too many of them in China and India even though, to be honest.
>>10709 >Ever heard of reading between the lines? Total eradication was never mentioned, sure. But it's implied. The Rigaveda literally states that they nearly killed all the native poos in India. If it was a implication, then we can clearly fault that they should of either eradicated them or reduced their numbers to a very small minority. I'm finding it funny how we are finding new types of shills and idiots on this board every time. I come back after searching for Whites in China research and I find a nazbol shill and now some anti-Nietzschean. >>10719 >They only destroy the planet when they are introduced to White technology. <This is White people's fault Holy shit you're dumb. They've been destroying ecosystem since the dawn of man, retard. Niggers and red-skins don't need White technology to destroy their surrounding environments, because they've been doing it with spears and horses way before the Bantu took over most of Africa and Indians were introduced to gunpower from Anglo and French colonists. Modern technology has only hasten the process to harm if not destroy nature. You're literally blaming shit on Whites when they had nothing to do with it.
>>10722 China and India treat one of the most sacred parts of nature like a goddamn arms race. They are incapable of keeping their legs shut to any degree. Why does it matter to keep a few pets of lesser races around to squat on land that could be improved by Whites (or, at the very least, left alone and pristine instead of razed for all its value and then some by the incompetent freaks of nature)?
Going to be switching IPs after this post before some retards calls me a samefag when I come in with an ID later. >>10723 >and now some anti-Nietzschean Mad that Nietzsche has been exposed as being a negative influence on the West? Gay French postmodernists just can't get enough of the man. >They've been destroying ecosystem since the dawn of man, retard <source: my ass >they've been doing it with spears and horses Completely different than the destruction caused by industrialism. It's not even on the same scale, it's laughable that you even mention this. >Indians were introduced to gunpower from Anglo and French colonists. Again, it's Western tech falling into non-White hands that leads to destruction, like I said. >Modern technology has only hasten the process to harm if not destroy nature. Yes. >You're literally blaming shit on Whites when they had nothing to do with it. I didn't say it was White peoples fault beyond the fact that retards actually didn't take active measures against NOT letting them get a hold on our technology. This was the mistake. Everything afterwards is not our fault. Whites aren't responsible for Chinks polluting rivers and making their cities into unbreathable smoggy hellscapes today. That's on them. >>10724 China and India need 95% of their population removed. I don't think we need to kill every single non-White on the planet but I understand the need for massive reductions.
>>10726 But again, what does keeping around a few pets of other races do for Whites or the land they occupy? I don't want them gone because I like violence; I want them gone because I am completely disgusted by their attitudes toward nature. The majority of the population should be White races, then any other ethnicity that lives in accordance with natural balance to a lesser extent.
>>10727 >what does keeping around a few pets of other races do for Whites or the land they occupy? Nothing. They can just do whatever the fuck they want so long as it doesn’t harm Whites, and since they’ll be driven back to the Stone Age, they more assuredly won’t. It’s not like I foresee them living among us. That is a failed experiment, and is anti-Nature, it seems, at this point. Maybe we can keep a nigger or two in the zoo though. The majority of the population will be White, and there will be segregation on a global scale.
(154.62 KB 1024x768 do not touch the heated bed.jpg)
>>10722 >Without Whites importing machinery, factories, building roads and building cities, not to mention giving these apes education, the vast majority of these people would still be living in the jungle. You think the chinks won't step in to fill the void? They are already doing it now. You can't put the genie back in the bottle. They have copies of all our books, the blueprints to all our inventions, and they are capable of making cheap good-enough copies of it all based on that information, ready for export.
>>10729 Of course they would. Regardless of what happens, any attempt to depopulate people is basically going to devolve into a nuclear war. China is armed to the teeth with over a billion people, and India too is a nuclear state. We would have to absolutely cripple these states to such an extent that they wouldn’t be able to lift a finger in retaliation. The genie is out of the bottle regarding tech, but tech is a two varieties, as Ted taught. Organization-dependent tech is what we have to keep focused on. That is absolutely capable of regressing, and has in the past after societal collapse, which is basically what an attempt at depopulation would be accelerating and forcing to happen. Thermonuclear strikes on Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chengdu, Chongqing, Dongguan, Shenyang and Wuhan, and China is dead. That’s every major city, and at least 100,000,000 dead, which is not enough, but would cripple China economically, politically and socially.
>>10728 So what major contention is there with the ethnoglobe crowd, then? Keeping a few subhumans around is functionally the same as completely wiping them out in my eyes. I want a world where Whites obtain such a crushing victory that they will guide the world for the rest of time. I'm not sure if that's even better, keeping a few around. Even if they aren't on the same level as Whites, such an incredible subjugation has to be mind-shattering. How could they even live normally afterward? >>10723 made a good point that they don't necessarily need higher technology to destroy their ecosystems, and that's partially what I had been alluding to by mentioning China/India's rabbit-like nature. I guess it's hypocritical that I feel sorry for big, deadly African fauna and wish niggers were gone at the same time, but I consider other animals more important for the environment than any subhuman race.
>>10732 >So what major contention is there with the ethnoglobe crowd, then? I don’t see it as absolutely necessarily or worthwhile to go around hunting down every non-White on planet. A lot of it just seems like power fantasies to me too. Not the idea itself but the posters who frequently post about it (a certain Torfag seems to sporadically do this). I don’t have as big of a problem with it as one may think. I even made a lot of the posts about it in the past, but got annoyed with it when low-effort retards started shitting up every thread with ethnoglobe nonsense (that doesn’t happen anymore, though). >and that's partially what I had been alluding to by mentioning China/India's rabbit-like nature. If they were deprived of Western medical care though this wouldn’t matter though. They’d be living in squalor and would again have extremely high infant mortality rates, which is what modern medicine has “fixed”, and has allowed populations to unfortunately sky-rocket in non-White developing countries. Not to mention they’d be living in an irradiated destroyed landscape for quite some time. Not sure how long it would take nature to recover, probably rather quickly, it’s not like every square inch of land even needs hit. Not in the slightest. Industrial centers, ports, major towns, military installations, etc. >I consider other animals more important for the environment than any subhuman race. Animals just follow their instincts and play their part. Niggers don’t know when to stop exploiting and overreaching
>>10733 >Animals just follow their instincts and play their part. Niggers don’t know when to stop exploiting and overreaching This is my problem with just leaving nonWhites alone. I don't want the ecosystem of their localities left to the nonWhites' devices, but I also think it's a bit cruel to basically zoo them. I wouldn't even have zoos full of other animals around if it were up to me. I am slowly abandoning the "live and let live" idea, given how it is applied to other aspects of civilization. Leaving nonWhites around to any degree might just be kicking the ball down to the future descendants of Whites. This whole business of dragging nonWhites kicking and screaming into civilization should never be repeated, and I don't have faith that Whites can overcome their relatively-strong sense of compassion. Whites' ancestors had the world in their palm and didn't crush the ones that plague their descendants today.
>>10736 Yeah, I would have to look into or think about how these people react when by themselves towards the environment around them and in regards to local fauna and the like. I know that when people have moved into continents or islands the natural wildlife often suffere, some of it going extinct, but I would think that there would be a stasis reached at some point between the people and the animals, assuming that the people’s population isn’t growing too rapidly. I know on Pacific islands the islanders in multiple different places completely deforested and then fucked themselves over in one way or another, but then again those were more examples of settlement rather than an environment they were indigenous too. It also seems to depend on who we’re talking about. Asians seem to be a problem in particular, but then Abos don’t really seem to do anything. They’re literally hardly human in that case. But they live on White territory at this point, so it would be better to just gas them or something, because they just sit around huffing gas fumes all day anyway. It’s a tough question. If ethnoglobe seemed inevitable I wouldn’t oppose it though. At the end of the day it’s either us or them.
>>10726 >source:my ass https://wildlife.org/early-humans-also-drove-megafaunal-extinctions/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_expansion https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2012.10011 The Bantu expansion was one of the earliest eras where niggers gained access to iron metals and created weapons and cities that not only brought upon the domination of the Bantu within Africa, but lead to the destruction of the rainforests that used to reside everywhere. Hell the North Africans from Egypt and Levantines could also be credited for migrating and trading resources that the niggers never knew existed, lead to the desertification and loss of many African forests and landscapes. Muh Whites lead to mass environmental destruction is bull, because it was also Whites who prevented most of the ecosystems and animals within North America and Africa from being wiped out in the first place. >Completely different than the destruction caused by industrialism. No it isn't, industrialism wasn't rapid within Africa during the colonial era until America, (((The Soviet Union))) and (((CCP))) all butted into African affairs and exported resources all across the continent for proxy wars and muh human rights. Africa didn't become like it is until after the major European powers of the 19 and early 20th century gave up on their colonies during the Cold War in which many didn't do much, but establish cities and export and import resources from White segregated settlements and nations, as they slowly invited technology into Africa under the hands of Whites to prevent instability and control niggers. Horses and ironworks attributed to the destruction of Africa's many ecosystems way before Europeans arrived. You quite literally do not want to argue with knowledge in hand and only takes things that you think is true.
>>10741 >first link This certainly happened in North America and Australia, among other places, but it is not like this is unique to these people. Just look into the fact that several thousand years ago there lived pygmy elephants in Cyprus, Malta, Crete, Sardinia and Sicily, among other islands in Europe. These islands were also known for pygmy hippopotamuses as well. Europe used to be populated as well by lions, especially in the area of Greece, the Balkans and Spain. One could probably point to the aurochs as well. >Muh Whites lead to mass environmental destruction is bull Industrialism and rampant capitalism has led to far greater environmental devastation within two centuries than has thousands of years of shitskins chopping down trees and killing off megafauna when they move into a new area. Acting like if Whites hadn't come into Africa and North America there would have been a complete destruction of the environment imminently is retarded, because all we ended up doing is accelerating the process by bringing them 'civilization'. >Horses and ironworks attributed to the destruction of Africa's many ecosystems way before Europeans arrived Laughable.
>>10759 >This certainly happened in North America and Australia, among other places, but it is not like this is unique to these people. Not that anon, but You are such a faggot holy shit. Now you're defending non-Whites and making excuses for them . You project others for being Judaic, but act more-so than anyone else within this thread. They literally destroyed entire ecosystems and extinct numerous species that used to reside in many of their lands and yet you're still hungry for brown dick with faulty excuses and lies. >Just look into the fact that several thousand years ago there lived pygmy elephants in Cyprus, Malta, Crete, Sardinia and Sicily, among other islands in Europe These are not Whites via Northern European, these are medcucks who contain Levant-shit DNA. It only make sense that the descendants of browns would extinct many European animals. Also you're contradicting yourself and admitting that ancient ironworks can indeed kill off our ecosystems, but don't seem to think this when the credit attributes to non-Whites, hmmm. >Industrialism and rampant capitalism has led to far greater environmental devastation This argument doesn't hold up when environmental destructionism was not rapid until the late 20th century. Also you're dumb, because neolithic farming has lead to devasation of Earth's landscapes as much as industrialism have. You're trying to pin shit on Whites like a jew. >laughable >No argument Typical.
(1.70 MB 1008x672 ClipboardImage.png)
(314.89 KB 843x472 ClipboardImage.png)
(897.80 KB 1012x519 ClipboardImage.png)
(1.02 MB 791x546 ClipboardImage.png)
(677.33 KB 553x407 ClipboardImage.png)
>>10760 >Now you're defending non-Whites and making excuses for them I don't think anyone can seriously maintain in good faith that the first three pics are on par with the last two. The mental gymnastics must be insane.
And before I am called anti-White again - by no means am I anti-White. The sort of technology that White minds have created is truly impressive, but with great powers come great responsibilities, and if there is one area that Whites have failed in, it is in exercising proper responsibility in regards to our technology, and allowing it to enslave us, and to allow it to slip into the hands of non-Whites, and to make profits off of selling them our goods. Spengler predicted nearly a century ago that this would lead to the destruction of our people, and everything he has said is coming true right before our eyes. Read 'Man and Technics'. There is nothing controlling the development of our technology except for a lust for short-term gain and maximum efficiency, which necessarily leads to the destructive clownworld we have now. Part of the reason is because we have fallen under Jewish influence. Just as it is Whites who have inadvertently wrought much destruction, it is also Whites who are the first to have actually begun to care about the environment, the health of the planet and the preservation of animals. Non-Whites don't care. They would keep going down the path of the destruction if they are not stopped before long, they are content with living in their polluted muck. Only Whites can save what has been brought about.
>>10762 >I don't think anyone can seriously maintain in good faith that the first three pics are on par with the last two Again mentally retarded, because it's also Whites who are saving environments and you are forgetting that we were forced to adapt to industrialism like Anglos were in the US and Victorian England.
>>10709 >Anons aren't stupid. We're still coming for you shitskins. Take your meds already.
(115.33 KB 636x832 tarrant anger.png)
>>10765 Clearly you did not read the post I made minutes after that one to avoid this sort of mentally retarded response: >>10763
>>10796 >Oh shit I've been found out! He knows brown niggers are using the board <let's make a stock overused response <that'll teach him Man I can't fucking wait to hang you darkie scum. Getting worried that your "journey" of "redpills" have come to an end and how the truth is going to turn on you? Guess what, the game was rigged from the very beginning. You being redpilled is pointless. It's only White people who ever mattered and will matter in the future. Get fucked.
(85.33 KB 1000x700 yikes pepe.jpg)
>>10803 >another post utterly devoid of quality
>>10722 >The only exceptions are China and Japan They got a massive upgrade from Whites. Japan did it much earlier. Meiji asked for hundreds of Whites to help the nips modernize their society. Chinks and pajeets keep sending their best ones in our (((open))) academies and universities. Then, as Jews organize the dismemberment of the Western world, they put it on a platter for Asian countries and their billions of people they can tax to buy at a bargain our companies that are desperate to sell their shit in Asia, or sold by CEO/COOs who only care about adding a few more nice zeroes at the end of their yearly bonus. >and maybe the Middle East I wouldn't think so. There is nothing technology wise that comes out of that area that is ahead of Western level or is obtained without, again, collabs with White scientists. Only Israel stands above because of the more clever Ashkenazim, thanks to centuries of assimilating White DNA into their disgusting mix up. The point being that even the most minute trace of White DNA can considerably improve a whole lineage. You see that in Japan, those who succeed the most are Whiter and have facial features, faint for sure, that are reminiscent of some very distant non-pure Asian addition. Even the "great" Middle Eastern philosophers and theologians were most likely mutts, which is fairly easy to understand since they practiced slavery very openly until the last century, and loved picking on Whites. This is going to repeat itself in Israel because of the sexual White slaves taken from Eastern Europe, mainly Ukraine. Huh, one more reason to annihilate that rapacious country.
>>10723 >they should of Please. Don't write like a wigger.
>>10719 >They only destroy the planet when they are introduced to White technology. This introduction is the problem. We should have kept it to ourselves. Niggers can destroy an ecosystem without even any technology, just numbers. Cue Haiti. But their increase in numbers and presence in Haiti is, again, due to Whites being bewitched into bleeding for niglets who starve.
>>10807 >Japan did it much earlier. Meiji asked for hundreds of Whites to help the nips modernize their society. They were even trying to get White women imported at one point in order to get a better gene expression among their people. I think the pro-race mixer guy was assassinated though, since he was trying to do kiked shit like abolish the Japanese language and writing system as well.
>>10726 >China and India need 95% of their population removed. I don't think we need to kill every single non-White on the planet but I understand the need for massive reductions. If you have removed 95% of people, mostly be direct mass murder, why keep the last 5% and not finish them off too? Also, your numbers are off. Chinese and Indians are respectively 1.4 and 1.3 billions each in their homelands. That's 1,400 and 1,300 millions. 5% is 70 and 65 millions. Within thirty years they can reach 100 millions, if only because the removal of former demographic biowastes has liberated copious amounts of food. The good news is that these countries depend on food imports to unfathomable heights for their survival, hence their rabid obsession for land acquisition. This is going to put them on a crash course with us. Israel invests in Asia only to make sure the most advanced Asian countries will be powerful enough to guarantee a maximum destruction on Whites. Meanwhile Jews will turtle up and feign being neutral. A nuclear war means we must, at any cost, fire nukes at Israel as much as possible, even if some White countries fall in the process. No way a nuclear war would happen without these cockroaches coming out unscathed. >>10727 >I want them gone because I am completely disgusted by their attitudes toward nature. If you remove the plastics and technology for a moment, you see that many backwater Asiatic populations are rather close to Nature, much more than us. It's just that they don't mind the squalor of their desolate modern lives.>>10732 >Even if they aren't on the same level as Whites, such an incredible subjugation has to be mind-shattering. How could they even live normally afterward? Talking of mind-shattering effects, have any of you actually imagined the kind of empire that would be needed to indoctrinate so many soldiers into xeno-slaughtering death machines? :3 How would Whites even walk out of this still sane?
>>10811 >Also, your numbers are off. Chinese and Indians are respectively 1.4 and 1.3 billions each in their homelands. That's 1,400 and 1,300 millions. 5% is 70 and 65 millions. Those are decent numbers when one takes into account population density. If India had 65 million people, it would have a population density of 51 people per square mile compared with its 1,067 people per square mile that it has now. That population would roughly be around where India was estimated to be at in 1 AD, over two millennia ago. With China, even with 70,000,000 people, the resulting population density would be ~19 people per square mile, compared to the 375 people per square mile that we exists now. That's over twice as low as literal desert countries like Saudi Arabia, for a huge chunk of Asia. Looking at estimates, this is basically sending China back into the BC era. Now this still might not sound satisfying, but there is a further Whitepill here. We are increasingly living in an age that is utterly dependent on supply routes, grocery stores, and the government. People don't know how to naturally hunt and find food like they could in the past. So even if 95% of the population of these countries are wiped out, they won't be able to feed themselves well, and there will likely be further outbreaks of disease, radiation poisoning, starvation and other problems resulting from our devastation of their lands. >If you have removed 95% of people, mostly be direct mass murder, why keep the last 5% and not finish them off too? It's mainly out of not caring whether some live on afterwards. Anyone who is claiming that we just HAVE TO hunt down every single last non-White is being dumb as far as I'm concerned. I don't see it as a worthwhile concern, personally. >Within thirty years they can reach 100 millions I partially discussed some of this in my early post, but I am not 100% sure this would happen, especially with no modern medicine. It's possible though, and maybe this would show that eventually total eradication might be necessary. Those lands will be miserable after we are done with them, I can't imagine them being areas of much growth. It's hard to speculate though, we are talking about levels of destruction that have never before been seen on this planet. >Meanwhile Jews will turtle up and feign being neutral. A nuclear war means we must, at any cost, fire nukes at Israel as much as possible, even if some White countries fall in the process. No way a nuclear war would happen without these cockroaches coming out unscathed. Oh, believe me, any scenario I think of here is predicated on every Jew on the planet being dead prior to this happening. Every Jew on the planet must die. I do not budge on this issue.
>>10811 >How would Whites even walk out of this still sane? I think we'll manage fine. Crushing foreign tribes in retaliation for a war of genocidal aggression waged upon us is a hell of a lot closer to fulfilling man's natural drive than being forced by the government to live among your enemies in a sprawling paved shopping mall dystopia and bear witness to fighting age brown men replace you every day while being doped up by big pharma to cope. If anything we'll probably come out the other side of this in a healthier mental state than now.
The International Jew is way more concise and detailed about the Jewish Question than Mein Kampf.
>>10808 >>10805 So my posts are bad but you fail to realize that it's being talked about by other people, in this very thread. Again my point keeps being proven, someone or some people just find some topics about the future to be "pathetic" or "cringe" because muh violence. I find satisfaction knowing that some butthurt mutt or coffee colored nigger is realizing that he is in big trouble when more and more Whites wake up and prepare to do what's necessary. And it just ain't the jews going away, Jamal. Or Pedro. Or Kumar.
>>10836 It's the future they chose. They could have allied with us instead of agitating against us. It's not too late. But no, they will counter-signal us until the minute before the blade is against their throat.
(107.98 KB 823x737 dma.PNG)
>>10316 >The entire "vaccination agenda" also does not add into the anti-White agenda at all, as non-Whites have received priority for vaccinations.
>>10831 I wouldn't doubt that. Mein Kampf is a good book and interesting read, but it's not exactly concise.
>>10831 MK gets a lot of praise and has very solid pieces worth sharing but it's a sludge in some places. TIJ was meant to go straight to a given point, notably because it was the result of an inquiry financed precisely for that. However, wasn't Fordism dehumanizing to some extent?
>>10798 Fuck you and your post dumb post. I'm making arguments of the stupid shit your saying either make a counter or shut-up.
>>10316 >It stems from mostly cuckservatives and cuckservative-adjacent WN's We have proof that it literally kills people and turns them sterile. You shills are retarded and need to stop allowing muh cuckservatives to rent free in your tiny brain. Do not take the vaccine, if you do then you're a faggot. The jews and liberals desperately want you to take it and here is one trying to make excuses.
>>11000 So what's the play here? The regime is trying to kill off the most loyal heckin' science believing segments of the population?
I am anti-modern. I only browse this place because I find the content interesting and like some of the environmental stuff posted here. Fascists are naive because even if all Jews dropped dead today, the technological problem would not stop at all but be ever-present just as it is today. This problem will not dissipate just because Whites have "souls" or whatever you want to believe because of the principle of technological determinism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_determinism ^Marx came up with this theory, but it was mainly elaborated on by Veblen and Ellul. Ethnic scapegoating distracts from technological problems. Ecofascists on here are subverters of real anti-modern ideology. The people whining on here about Jews are analogous to someone complaining about mosquitoes while standing in front of a firing squad. Almost none of you have your priorities straight.
>>11011 Technology is power, like all power it is neither good or bad it just is. Thanks to technology we have gained more knowledge about the universe and it showed us the doom that will happen to our race if we do not become more advanced and expand beyond our planet. Decry the change of humanity all you want, but confining humanity just to Earth is a form of burying your head into the sand.
>>11016 Technology is not just "power" but is incompatible with nature in the long run. You can see from the widespread damage to the environment that this is clearly the case, and it will only get worse internationally in the following decades. Even if modern society lasts forever, people will be modified for the sake of maximizing efficiency; in other words, they (including White people) will be gradually turned into or replaced by machines. See the arguments of chapter 2 of this book.
>>11006 >So what's the play here? The regime is trying to kill off the most loyal heckin' science believing segments of the population? The regime is trying to cull the population in general for control. After they've failed to get everyone to take the vaccine they are now are tracking down anyone who refuses which is why they are going after mostly spics and niggers and WNs. Even if what you said was true, there is no way we should take the vaccine and crying muh cuckservatives is just you a shitty projection, because even a broken clock can be right once. Notice how everyone who has taken the vaccine is a jew, liberal, or subversive.
>>11011 >Ethnic scapegoaping > Ecofascists on here are subverters of real anti-modern ideology. It seems that you don't understand anything about ecofascism. Jews are behind and run our world's technology today. The fight between Aryans and jews have never been about just killing off the other and running the world as it is, but for a complete change as far as what technology is to be used for each own's respective goals and purposes. Many NSDAP members were always skeptical of technology and knew that it was turning Germans into degenerates and destroying our ecosystems which is why they saw that it was only a means to the end. Limiting tech is the only solution at this moment. >>11016 > Thanks to technology we have gained more knowledge about the universe This isn't even close to being true, because we've known a-lot about the universe way before modern technology took the credit for everything. As matter of fact, arguably we have know less about the order of things than our pagan ancestors due to NASA and their puppet scientists are trying to force in materialism as the explanation for why our universe exists and 'how it functions". >and it showed us the doom that will happen to our race if we do not become more advanced and expand beyond our planet. The doom of the White race is also happening because of technology. It is one of the main reasons reason why there are so many human cattle in the world who buy iphones and eat shit food 24/7. You don't need tech to even analysis and recognize this just look out the window and examine the everyday life for the average urbanite. We already have books from Hitler, Spengler, Evola, and Kaczynski who explained the damage modern technics have done to the world.
>>11027 >Notice how everyone who has taken the vaccine is a jew, liberal, or subversive. Right.. so is the regime trying to cull it's own adherents and support base? It doesn't really make sense.
>>11031 >Right.. so is the regime trying to cull it's own adherents and support base? It doesn't really make sense. You tough nut of a retard you know that? They're culling everyone and everything who isn't an elite. Do you think they give a shit about some liberals and socialists who were dumb enough to vote for Joe Biden and think he was going to deliver his promises? They're cannon fodder and always have been. Any self-inflicted casualties is either a mistake or purposely done. I think you just should admit that you want to take the vaccine, because you unironically believe that COVID is killing people. What would the jew lose from killing off the people who still believe in everything ZOG says? They're not trying to preserve anything, but their own skin.
>>11035 accurate. if anything, this is a "general culling." the pieces don't fit together any other way. those on this board constantly pushing the narrative that everything is always about jews killing Whites have a bizarre victim complex akin to jews themselves. most of the contrary data (articles and videos) have been put out so as to confuse the strong signal that the vaccine is lethal. since the elites cannot properly censor everything off the internet, they must dilute and confuse the information transmitted. those first to take the vaccine were always known as the useful idiot footsoldiers of the elite. thanks to God, these people have been sacrificed first. "the lessons we learn are written on the tombstones of others." we can be grateful to God that many spics, niggers, and leftists will perish due to this vaccine. those crying about losing Whites are the same that were crying about us needing to eliminate these same people just 2 years ago.
>>11031 You ever come to realize that our elites aren't very smart? They're egoists and only care about saving themselves as they willingly sacrifice their own to accomplish their greater goals. Why is this illogical to you, when Israel does this type of shit with the United States and all of their goy or mischlings fanatics? BLM and Antifa have mostly attacked and damaged liberals and their shit-hole cities. They're literally the type of idiots who would rather harm themselves over their own enemies just to enforce some rules and changes. Getting a nurse or a doctor killed is nothing to them, because they are easily replaceable and have the media to lie about the state of everything.
>>11040 the main thing we have to worry about is the elites flipping the table over when they "lose." these people are completely unhinged and i wouldn't put a nuclear exchange or worse past them.
>>11035 Different anon. The elite are arrogant, but not stupid. If you constantly underestimate them, you will lose. They know that, as Jews, they have a parasitic relationship with the goyim and need them in their utopia, which is why the Torah and Talmuds talk about the goyim becoming spiritual slaves to the Jews. What would they stand to gain by killing people who would make perfect ZOGbots in their empire? NOTHING! The vaccine is the aforementioned spiritual enslavement. My best theory right now is that they will use the graphine oxide nanoparticles to constrict blood flow to certain parts of the brain to eliminate nationalistic/spiritual thoughts. If you want to look at it spiritually, accepting the vaccine is submitting the soul to yahweh.
>>11035 >>11040 Doesn't really mesh with the whole "one billion Americans" elite consensus.
>>11029 "Limiting tech" will never realistically happen because each autonomous region / nation that does so puts itself at a significant disadvantage if it limits its technological development out of concern for long-term consequences. Even if a global government was established that limited technological development, it would eventually be subject to destructive competition via the processes of natural selection described in Anti-Tech Revolution - destructive competition from another self-prop system that would likely have less regard for limiting global technology, otherwise it would probably not succeed in overthrowing the global government in the first place. Do you think technological development can realistically be limited? Nations cannot even agree on banning nuclear weapons, restricting carbon emissions, etc. There is no way in hell that particularly wasteful countries like the United States and China, the latter with a very poor environmental track record, are going to limit technological development. They will gladly support mining advances regardless of the environmental consequences that result, they will support transportation advances even if these alter the atmosphere more, and they will support the modification of human beings for maximal efficiency, everything from improved antidepressants and propaganda techniques to eventual cybernetic-genetic engineering of humans to fit into the mold that the technological system requires. These modifications, even if they are introduced at first as optional, will often eventually become required. All focus needs to be placed on overthrowing the technological system. No doubt, many people on here are True Believers, so they default to blaming Jews for nearly everything. Jews are disproportionately leftist, and I dislike both leftism and Zionism, but ethnic scapegoating serves as a distraction from the problem of technology. The people on here mock conspiracy theorists for scapegoating when they blame reptilians or other nonsense, but they fail to see it in themselves that their hatred is misplaced because the influence of technology on society is vastly more insidious than anything that Jews or blacks have ever done. Lastly, you might be referring to "limiting tech" itself. What good will this do if the moment that a new technological gadget comes out, it is inevitably used for both good and evil purposes on a worldwide scale? Drones that deliver packages can be used to harm innocents. The same thing applies to planes and biotech and all the rest of it. Ecofascism serves as a far-right subversion of anti-modern ideas in the same way that anarcho-primitivism is a far-left subversion of these ideas. Both these groups of people are foolish because their ideas fundamentally contradict anti-modern ones. Totalitarian statism and wild nature, just like leftist values and nature, are ultimately incompatible.
>>11044 >Different anon. The elite are arrogant, but not stupid. If you constantly underestimate them, you will lose. They know that, as Jews, they have a parasitic relationship with the goyim and need them in their utopia, which is why the Torah and Talmuds talk about the goyim becoming spiritual slaves to the Jews. What would they stand to gain by killing people who would make perfect ZOGbots in their empire? You people are actually retarded and your samefag is even dumber. The Torah talks of killing and enslaving goys you imbecile to the extent that render as insignificant. They're not killing everyone enmass, just one by one, but if they could they would and, are trying to do so right now. They gain everything from this scenario, because their goal is to cull the numbers to be suitable for their agenda. This isn't hard to understand and it's clear that most anons here don't know the nature of the elites. >>11045 >Doesn't really mesh with the whole "one billion Americans" elite consensus. One billion Americans goal is a made-up nonsense and not the goal of the jews. >>11046 >"Limiting tech" will never realistically happen because each autonomous region / nation that does so puts itself at a significant disadvantage if it limits its technological development out of concern for long-term consequences. Most advanced tech are solely within and handled by urban cities you moron. Ecofascism goal is limit tech to all civilians. You don't need every region to have advance technology to gain an advantage. You're not hurting yourself from limiting technology from the masses. I can't believe that there are people here who think America's most rural regions are harming the United States' technological advantages against the world. You're a true midwit lmao.
>>11047 It's clear that we are not even on the same page. This argument will go nowhere and will seem absurd until we get there. I am talking about the large-scale and long-term sociological and global effects of technology. When you said "limiting tech," I originally thought that you meant technological DEVELOPMENT, not merely technology. Regardless, both technological development and technology itself will not be limited in the long run. Those countries that unnecessarily limit technology in general will be putting themselves at an economic and technological disadvantage, meaning that other systems will eventually prevail against them. For example, if the United States instituted policies that significantly limited technology, it would be putting itself at a clear economic disadvantage. You declare me a "midwit" but did not even address my argument. Look at my argument again that you quoted. You completely misinterpreted if not downright hallucinated what I stated.
>>11047 >One billion Americans goal is a made-up nonsense and not the goal of the jews. Agree to disagree.
>>11045 >Doesn't really mesh with the whole "one billion Americans" elite consensus. That's the goal of leftists, not jews or the elites in general. Their goal is more-so to depopulate the planet to one billion humans. I don't see what they gain from having allowing America's population to reach the billions. It's only going to create more violence and become harder to maintain. If they wanted one billion Americans then they would've at least created conditions for Americans to do so, that includes niggers who have the highest abortion and I think are first in having the highest death rates out of all races. The current state of America is not suitable for growing population towards one billion human inhabitants unless you migrate them here, but that even has its flaws and can work against the men and women in power and create even more environmental destruction, which the regime knows will only generate more diseases and cause mass famines.
>>11051 Agree to disagree. And I mean that. I don't need further opinions.
>>11050 They want one billion immigrants in America, this way they can castrate and kill them off in larger batches. It's more efficient that way.
>>11052 So no arguments? >>11053 Samefag? >this way they can castrate and kill them off in larger batches. This doesn't make any sense. It's just better to keep them low and maintained. One Billion is too unstable and will only work against them. They're already having a hard time trying to control spics and niggers, so why would they want at-least 300 million of them each?
>>11047 At any rate, every region of a country DOES need a technological advantage for that country to be maximally efficient. Farmers and miners need modern technology to be efficient in the work that they do even in rural areas, etc. It is very clear that maximally advanced technology generally corresponds to maximum efficiency. >I can't believe that there are people here who think America's most rural regions are harming the United States' technological advantages against the world. I never actually said that. All you're doing is just name-calling and strawmanning what I've declared. >You don't need every region to have advance technology to gain an advantage. Nonsense. Every region (or at least many of them) must have advanced technology or be exploited by advanced technology for a nation to gain maximal advantages in competition against other nations. Imagine if half of the states in the United States reverted to highly primitive farming methods. They would no doubt be less efficient than the technological means that they currently use. Farmers are forced to use advanced technology in the long-run whether they want to or not. Practically everyone is or will be given enough time.
>>11055 >So no arguments? There's no argument to make. You're of the opinion that one billion Americans is not elite consensus. The end. We're both looking at the same exact information and coming to different conclusions. Agree to disagree.
>>11049 > I originally thought that you meant technological DEVELOPMENT, not merely technology. It's both and you failed to explain why. >. Regardless, both technological development and technology itself will not be limited in the long run. Literally you can just not give it to them and outlaw it. You're once again on lolbergs-tier of "you can't do this!". >Those countries that unnecessarily limit technology in general will be putting themselves at an economic and technological disadvantage, Of course you will say this, fucking ancap faggot with the stupid nonsense of muh economics. I bet you think Afghanistan would of faired a better chance if they simply had large cities and gave iphones to every rural village, as they build mass factories. Fucking retard. >>11057 >At any rate, every region of a country DOES need a technological advantage for that country to be maximally efficient. No they do not, and you fail to prove otherwise. >Farmers and miners need modern technology to be efficient in the work that they do even in rural areas, etc. >Need modern technology Fucking midwits lmao.
>>11059 >There's no argument to make There are arguments to make. Simply argue and prove that the elites want one billion Americans and will gain something from it. >You're of the opinion that one billion Americans is not elite consensus. Lol what? What consensus says otherwise. America's population is slowly growing and hasn't had a boom since the 1950s. They're about as the same rates as they were during the Great Depression. You said nothing, but mere claims lol.
>>11061 As a matter of fact, even if it were true, this only proves that the elites are indeed stupid. Such an idea will likely turn against them, especially with all the niggers harassing and harming every race within Weimerica. They would be better off killing niggers and spics rather than allow them to reach numbers that will turn America into a 1st world African country.
>>11063 >First world Whoops, meant third world.
>>11057 >Farmers and miners need modern technology to be efficient in the work that they do even in rural areas, etc. Farmers don't need modern technology, it's just that the jews want every job on Earth to be dominated by corporations or agricultural sectors. Another option is to create more jobs and offer White Americans land to work at as farmers. Most industrial jobs can be reduced to cities and suburban areas. Not every rural region needs to have advanced tech to keep up with a country like China, a nation where farming is the most occupied job and has always been technological advanced as it stayed at-least 80% rural.
>>11047 > The Torah talks of killing and enslaving goys you imbecile to the extent that render as insignificant. No, it doesn’t. You would have to know nothing about the mindset of Jews to interpret it that way. The Jew thinks that death is the end for himself, so he seeks enteral life through trans-humanism. They were promised godliness by yahweh, so they seek to establish themselves as gods over goyimkind. THEY CANNOT ACHIEVE THEIR GODHOOD WITHOUT GOOD GOYIM SLAVES TO RULE OVER The vaccine will only cull good goys. What you are saying is that it is beneficial for them to remove the good goys, when that is not at all the case. Here is some evidence from the Torah Psalms 2:8 <Ask me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession. Psalms 18:43 <You have delivered me from the attacks of the people; you have made me the head of nations. Psalms 22:27 <All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations will bow down before him Psalms 45:17 <I will perpetuate your memory through all generations; therefore the nations will praise you for ever and ever. These quotes clearly show master/slave or god/subject dynamic being desired in the Torah. Their insane idea that the universe extends to everything. All are beasts of burden, or cattle if you will. You refusal to engage in polite debate and repeated use of the term “elites” instead of Jews leads me to think that you are either uninformed or some variant of a shill or CREST employee.
>>11068 USING RED TEXTS DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE MAKING A POINT RETARD >No, it doesn’t. You would have to know nothing about the mindset of Jews to interpret it that way. You clearly don't if you think they only enslave humans. > The Jew thinks that death is the end for himself, so he seeks enteral life through trans-humanism. Which is why they're for killing and have killed Aryans and goys in general. >They were promised godliness by yahweh, so they seek to establish themselves as gods over goyimkind. And their idea of Gods means they can do whatever they want from genocide to rape. You're not making any points that contradict and prove me wrong to assert that they will cull the population for their own benefit faggot. Slavery is all about the master and servant and the jews want to be the master by their own definition. Which is why jews have done nothing, but cause death to rid of all those who are goys even if they are servants to the jew. The jew still plans to colonize America as the majority and rid of Palestinians for opposing them. The jews recognize the racial war and yet you faggots gain nothing nor make any sense lying about how they will breed one billion Americans with the samefagging. >The vaccine will only cull good goys. The vaccine has killed liberals and niggers you idiot. Most vaccine users are liberals and they have been the ones who make-up for most of the death toll. Nothing you've said have proven me wrong, other than you're retarded and so need to call someone a shill when they disagree with you're bullshit. Here's an idea, how about you take the vaccine and die, so we can finally have some good posts on here, hmm?
>>11071 i wouldn't bother arguing with him, lad. it's a waste of time. this website is no longer a worthwhile place for such discussions, better discussions can be found elsewhere. we see and they don't. who knows the true reason for their fixation on the jews. it may be honest, it may be an operation. one thing you and i can agree on is it does not fit the data.
>>11071 >You clearly don't if you think they only enslave humans. Of course they don’t only enslave humans. They kill dissidents all the time, and will kill many more in the future. You’re pilpulling > And their idea of Gods means they can do whatever they want from genocide to rape. You're not making any points that contradict and prove me wrong to assert that they will cull the population for their own benefit faggot. They think they can do anything they want, sure. That doesn’t mean that killing those who would best serve their needs is the best option for them. They’re kikes, not retards. More pilpul. >Slavery is all about the master and servant and the jews want to be the master by their own definition. Their definition of slavery is the eternal rule of Jewish law. How does depopulation of prime slaves fit their definition? Not only that, but Jews also seem to love tradition slavery from the transatlantic slave trade, to trade with the caliphates, to the sections of their holy books devoted to the rules surrounding slavery. I guess they like to play god anyway they can. > Which is why jews have done nothing, but cause death to rid of all those who are goys even if they are servants to the jew. Like I have said before, this is not what they are doing. The main purpose of the vaccine is to ensure the control of Jewish law over the mind of the vaccinated. They would not be killing their ticket to utopia. > The jew still plans to colonize America as the majority and rid of Palestinians for opposing them. The Jew has done much more than colonize America. They rule it. America will not become the new Israel, though. It’s economy only has 5-10 years left, and they know it. As for the Palestinians, the Jews do hold a grudge against them. That’s more of a petty squabble over their favorite desert than anything else. > The jews recognize the racial war and yet you faggots gain nothing nor make any sense lying about how they will breed one billion Americans with the samefagging. The one billion Americans anon misinterpreted what that meant. The idea is that they want to import non-Whites until America has enough of a population to compete against China. It’s just meant to encourage cuckservatives to support being replaced out of some warped sense of nationalism. I doubt they actually want to up the population to a billion people. If you are a genuine anon who is a bit misguided, I encourage you to read the anti-Abraham thread and the Esoteric Motives of the Jews thread. There is a lot of good information in both of them about the core of the motivations and psychology of the Jews.
>>11011 Do you think that a mixed brown Earth will be able to solve the technological problem? Get real. Low IQ mongs will deal with the problem even worse than Europeans, who are the only ones with a chance of dealing with environmental problems in the future.
>>11074 Cont. >>11071 > The vaccine has killed liberals and niggers you idiot. Most vaccine users are liberals and they have been the ones who make-up for most of the death toll Exactly. You’re saying that the vaccine would be killing the good goys. That would be a disaster for the Jews. >Nothing you've said have proven me wrong, other than you're retarded and so need to call someone a shill when they disagree with you're bullshit. I have though. Through the posts I’ve made, I’ve shown you that a death vaccine would be a detriment to the plan of Universal Jewish Law. >Here's an idea, how about you take the vaccine and die, so we can finally have some good posts on here, hmm? Why would I do that? I don’t want to be a Jewish slave.
>>11074 >Of course they don’t only enslave humans. They kill dissidents all the time, and will kill many more in the future. That's what they're doing right now. I'm pipuling you're just a fucking retard. But no surprise, because you guys have admitted to being Amerimutts before. >That doesn’t mean that killing those who would best serve their needs is the best option for them. Who says they're directly killing them? They do not care, again they're cannon fodder for whatever happens for their great goals. Also you're wrong, because reminder they hate goys and won't to reduce to them to mere nothingness as soon as possible. They're literally too stupid to realize that everything they've worked and fought for was only going to work against them. They are literal idiots, like you are. >Their definition of slavery is the eternal rule of Jewish law. How does depopulation of prime slaves fit their definition? Man I swear just take the suicide pill at this point. You're fucking hopeless. Fucking retards can't even comprehend that it only makes sense to depopulate your enemies and enslave them entirely. The Greeks literally faced the issue of having their slaves outnumber them. You think the jews won't learn from the same lesson? >The Jew has done much more than colonize America. They rule it. America will not become the new Israel, though. It’s economy only has 5-10 years left, and they know it. How? They are already killing off Whites and doing their best to do the same for niggers. What would they lose for not colonizing Weimerica? If anything you can only argue that they are failing at it. Proving my point that they are idiots. They are actively buying land and establishing numerous communities throughout the country. How is that not colonization? >The one billion Americans anon misinterpreted what that meant. The idea is that they want to import non-Whites until America has enough of a population to compete against China. LOL! The elites love China, there is no war between them and the chinks, only lolbergs and cuckservatives who want to fight China. You guys suck at comprehending this whole scenario that is going on. >>11078 You're just dumb dude.
Bisexuality is fine, but exclusively fucking men is not.
(468.41 KB 905x1810 fags.png)
>>11080 There's no justification for any sort of homosexual behavior. It's all degenerate, even if you still are attracted to women.
>>11078 >Exactly. You’re saying that the vaccine would be killing the good goys. That would be a disaster for the Jews. No it wouldn't. The vaccine is not killing people in masses. It's only killing a few. This is clearly a miscalculation among the jews who expected everyone to take it. Which is why they're forcing it on everyone. They lose nothing from killing one spic who tells everyone to take the vaccine. Their goal here is to cull the population of Whites, Hispanics, and Negros all at the same time and at a consistent rate that allows them to become the majority and sole racial rulers of Western civilization. You're implying that they actually lose something from killing one White dude who thinks believes in ZOG in which they don't. The vaccine is indeed about culling humanity as we speak to a more suitable and stable growth to prevent any uprisings. Slaves can easily revolt and it's too much to handle when you have a country that is overpopulated and can easily be redpilled, because you cannot control the internet nor information that is spread amongst the masses.
>>11083 Please don't take me as a shill or anything, because I'm not gay myself, but I do have a friend who is red-pilled and likes both sexes. >There's no justification for any sort of homosexual behavior. What if it isn't common and advocated?
>>11085 >What if it isn't common and advocated? It does not matter, for it's abnormal and should not exist in a White or any society in general. Penis is meant for the vagina, not the butt. Your friend is just going to have to accept this as a fact and realize that he is walking down the wrong path.
(2.46 MB 1080x1920 the homosexual agenda fag gay.png)
>>11085 Your friend needs to think beyond his lust. Unfortunately he, like many young people today, has been raised in a society which increasingly says that if a person has a desire, it is good and valid for him to act on said desires and that to deny them the freedom to act of their lowest passions, that this is 'oppressive' or 'backwards'. You should read this post that I made the other day: >>10611.
>>11079 >That's what they're doing right now So agree with me? > Fucking retards can't even comprehend that it only makes sense to depopulate your enemies and enslave them entirely. The Greeks literally faced the issue of having their slaves outnumber them. You think the jews won't learn from the same lesson? I don’t doubt that they are depopulating Whites, and creating racially mixed people to serve as better slaves. That isn’t what the vaccine is for though. The vaccine is meant to restrict thought through use of the graphene oxide in the vaccine. > They are already killing off Whites and doing their best to do the same for niggers. They are encouraging blacks to have kids, and they are killing off Whites. They don’t need vaccines for that. The vaccines are only a consecration of their power. > What would they lose for not colonizing Weimerica? If anything you can only argue that they are failing at it. Proving my point that they are idiots. They are actively buying land and establishing numerous communities throughout the country. How is that not colonization? Everyday Jews wound not rule the world. The few hundred to a thousand from large banking families and the like would be the rulers, and even then they would be tripping over themselves for power. The people planing this have no concern for the majority of Jews. The land they are buying is for renting. If they can keep their vaccinated slaves renting forever, they can only ever worry about the bare minimum aspects of their survival. You can’t do that if all of the gentiles die from vaccinations. > LOL! The elites love China, there is no war between them and the chinks, only lolbergs and cuckservatives who want to fight China. You guys suck at comprehending this whole scenario that is going on. Do you see how you cut off the part where I said it’s a strategy to exploit the natural sense of nationalism some cuckservatives have for the purpose of importing massive levels of non-Whites to make it look like I was saying something I wasn’t. More pilpul. What a surprise. I’m totally the shill though, right? >You're just dumb dude Do you see how you can’t respond to the first point of that second post. The point that completely destroys your argument, that being that a death vaccine would only kill the people most fit for being slaves to the Jews. You have no interest in productive discussion. We don’t want any CREST employees here.
>>11084 Which group is more likely to get the vaccine, the one with high trust in authority and government who are easily intimidated, or the one with low trust in authority and government who are not easily intimidated?
(8.79 MB 776x432 jews slaves torah.mp4)
(751.67 KB 1534x1318 amalek redpill.png)
>>11068 >>11071 The bad goyim will be destroyed and their nations completely annihilated (Isaiah 60:12), while the good goyim will serve as the slaves of Zion. Most of Europe is Amalek and is slated for annihilation.
>>11079 >LOL! The elites love China, there is no war between them and the chinks, only lolbergs and cuckservatives who want to fight China. You guys suck at comprehending this whole scenario that is going on. No, I'm not quite so sure they do anymore.
>>11079 >You guys suck at comprehending this whole scenario that is going on. You lack self awareness or awareness of what is really going on. The elites despise what China is and want to turn it into a liberal democracy. That is why they funded the Hong Kong protests and probably are funding a hell of a lot more in China. The jews do not like "big scary dictatorships" because no matter how loyal you think your dictator is, he can turn on you in the blink of an eye and one day, you will wake up at 3 AM to be dragged out of your house by troops you knew were loyal to you just hours before. Then you find yourself put on trial before a cigar smoking dictator who you thought was in your pocket just yesterday. All your friends are in the same cage and you are shot after your show trial to the sound of cheering crowds who love to see the Dear Leader stand up to the corrupt bureaucrats they know are responsible for their misery.
>>10316 >It stems from mostly cuckservatives and cuckservative-adjacent WN's case in point: >>11035 >muh Biden There's also plenty of other posts below this one, probably coming from the same anon(s), claiming that: >it's not the Jews, the elite wants you to think that! They want to divide is by race and ethnicity! Typical Alex Jones-tier nonsense. There's also a lot of typical anti-China bullshit. Not the mention all of kookery and mental gymnastics that these retards engage in. Here's an example: >>11053 There's also the Dunning-Kruger effect and the typical smug "I know all the details of the conspiracy" talk. Example: >>11040 >You ever come to realize that our elites aren't very smart? The elites are either high estrogen, or are just Jews, but they're obviously intelligent.
>>11085 >What if it isn't common and advocated? I'm more of the "see nothing, hear nothing" type but that's just me. With the advent of porn, it's become like this. For me, porn sexualizes anyone (age is not even a barrier which is fucked up) and anything. Thing is I have watched straight porn but sometimes I see a man in a street and go "wow he is in a great shape". But does this mean I am "attracted" to him? The whole homosexuality thing destroyed the idea of man to man bromance friendships in my opinion. That's why whenever two men want to have a wholesome hug or give emotional support to each other, it's considered "gay" or some stupid shit.
>>11110 Yeah, it's very unfortunate what the normalization of homosexuality has done to male friendships. It has really gotten to the extent that you can't even compliment someone or express any affection (even if non-physical) without there being a certain awkwardness due to the gay specter. Hence having to couch this stuff with 'no homo' and shit. >but sometimes I see a man in a street and go "wow he is in a great shape". But does this mean I am "attracted" to him? Obviously not. That is just appreciating / recognizing that someone is healthy and has an aesthetic body. It's not really a 'base' reaction in the same that eye-fucking someone and getting aroused is when you see their ass from across the room >bromance This term is really gay though.
>>11011 >Vebbleb and Ellilu As if a strong power couldn't redirect the might of technology to have it serve human interests.Same tired argument we had in that ecofash thread, same point served warm by the Pennti Ted cult. NS proved technology could serve people. It was mandatory for urban youngsters to spend time in the more primitive rural areas, to bond with the soil and a more natural culture. >>11029 >The doom of the White race is also happening because of technology. Used by Jews against us. Technology is neutral, just more efficient in allowing groups to dominate or destroy others. The existence under Aryan principles applied to technology would be night and day with what we know today. Also you don't need technology to be able to destroy a land mass, to remove its forests or kill to many creatures of a given type. This happened several times, way before our smartphones ever existed.
>>11011 Technological determinism is partially true. The real problem is rampant technology. There is no guiding system of values or morals that prevent the spread of technology into every domain of our lives. All that matters today in the modern mindset is purely quantitative concerns. More efficient, faster, more production, etc. This growth of rampant, unchecked technology encroaches on organic human communities and incorporates them into the system, thereby enslaving them and dehumanizing them. At the end of the day though, we are not helpless before technology, it is not autonomous and fully deterministic. But then on the other hand, Jews are absolutely a factor that we cannot ignore. True, if Jews vanished today, there would still be the problem of modern technology and modern mindsets. I 100% agree, but Jews also have a role in spreading these sorts of mindsets among us. Many aspects of the modern world were directly prophesied in the Old Testament and they seem to be coming true before our eyes in how the Jews are acting today. Many Jews see themselves as a sort of advancing civilization, which is synonymous as far as I'm concerned with modern technological society. Jews love this. They want more and more control and efficiency, and globalization, etc. But to go even deeper, there are problems such as rationalism, materialism, etc that don't seem to have sprung directly from Jews, but are fundamental to modernity. The picture is very complex, really. Jews are a key component I cannot overlook, but there is certainly economic and environmental and other ideological components at work here. Even mass immigration can be linked to capitalism, globalism and modern technology, but Jews are the foremost proponents of this, as we all know. The best approach is a two-pronged approach that attacks modernity and Jews simultaneously.
(78.02 KB 960x720 himmler on christianity.jpg)
>>11321 >NS proved technology could serve people. It was mandatory for urban youngsters to spend time in the more primitive rural areas, to bond with the soil and a more natural culture. Not quite. There were promising signs that showed that it could have moved this way if they had won the war though. The Third Reich certainly had people with positive mindsets towards Nature in the highest places though.
The BO/Janny is a faggot for deleting posts.
>>11066 >Farmers don't need modern technology, it's just that the jews want every job on Earth to be dominated by corporations or agricultural sectors. This is true. I do not understand why one or two anons cannot consider that such technology restraining policies would be put in place by people who also protect the economy with tariffs. Parallelal to this, each household in the country side should have a lot for growing crops. Modern peasantry need not be dumb fucks with no internet. As for the billion amerimutts, what kind of nonsense is this? Migrants aren't being brought in for the sake of making the overall population greater but just to swarm Whites who, on the other hand, are locked into a psychological and economical trap where making babies is both unwelcome and unsound.
>>11071 >The vaccine has killed liberals and niggers you idiot. Most vaccine users are liberals and they have been the ones who make-up for most of the death toll. Nothing you've said have proven me wrong, other than you're retarded and so need to call someone a shill when they disagree with you're bullshit. Here's an idea, how about you take the vaccine and die, so we can finally have some good posts on here, hmm? Their strategy is to create a normie-NPC world which is both liberal and extremely constrictive at the same time, depending on the topic at hand. Liberalism is simply for everything that destroys Aryanhood. They knew they would have little effect on unruly goys, their point is simply to have enough NPCs and terrorize them legally. Their entire structure depends on this, the legality. This is why only illegal action, civil war and witch hunts of our enemies will free us. Jews spend all their resources mentally enslaving Whites, chipping at our numbers one by one. It's attrition in the hope that if we were to wake up and bear arms openly, we would be too few and too old. Their entire power pyramid is extremely precarious and we saw it when rather soft rioters entered the Capitol which had all the polfags coiling in complete fear. The death by vaccine is part of this strategy to hammer us down into obedience but it's also only working on idiots, ignoramuses and other leftist liberals. They could never apply any form of communistic regulation of dissenters by vanning and murder until they have properly locked down the whole of society. This is exactly what they're trying to do right now but they're actually struggling a lot. So they will use more shock and terror, more mass murders blamed on us Whites, and crack down on us as much as they can by sheer brute force. This is why they need total control through the pass system and achieve a maximum surveillance society with snitches, cops, non-privacy at home (IoT) and CCTV apparatuses everywhere. Vaccines are as of yet absolutely not meant to cull anyone, they're a terrorist tool. If Jews want to kill hundreds of millions, they will either try to turn the whole Western world into a giant gulag, or if this fail they'll resort to the age old trick of world war that, miraculously fails to harm the Jewish power structure.
>>11074 >The one billion Americans anon misinterpreted what that meant. The idea is that they want to import non-Whites until America has enough of a population to compete against China. It’s just meant to encourage cuckservatives to support being replaced out of some warped sense of nationalism. I doubt they actually want to up the population to a billion people. They made sure that the United States has antagonized all brown nations and with Europe are presently used as cum dumpsters for all shitskins. The increase of non-White population is only meant so that regardless of the outcome of war or if civil wars are even triggered ahead of invasions, White would be too few to organize and repel the foreigners. I don't think they're looking at increasing the US population to one billion, they could not handle it (they barely hold the country whole right now). Their propaganda is much less effective on the migrants, it only works because there's still a lot of proud White liberal or Christians who love their flag and the Constitution somehow. I mean that strategically and militarily, one billion people, mostly shitskins, would not be valuable in a NATO vs Nazbol scenario if you think they would be meant to bring numbers against Eurasians. They're only useful in the sense that once a world war erupts, the US would implode with most of these unfaithful migrants turning against each other and Whites. Jews would simply watch the whole shitstorms happening from a walled distance.
>>11079 >They are already killing off Whites If you call that "killing off Whites" then you've seen nothing. We're not even at South Africa levels and that too is quite tame overall. Jews probably thought they could brainwash all Whites into good Jew loving goyim but that seems to be failing spectacularly so now they're planning on using Eurasians, including Russia which still has a favorable ratio of Whites, to do Israel's bidding and increase its landmass. Yet they're barely achieving it. Trump gave them plenty of concessions but that has not moved their agenda much overall. It's totally possible that in the eventually of a failure of Zionism, Jews would drop it entirely and revert to the good ol' parasite roadmap and settle in Eurasia in greater numbers again, until perhaps much much later they could goad the current power block to destroy most Middle Eastern nations. Short of a wide scale genocide in the Middle East, I do not see how Israel could expand any more. The best they could perhaps achieve would be to create puppet states around Israel and that too is extremely hard considering the hostility of their neighbors. 90s USA was a great tool, all they had to do was crank up the Zionism without threatening Whites. But they fucked up this opportunity with mass immigration (whatasurprise.jpeg) and have now to find a better super bully, which will be Russia-China. This Nazbol international regime seated in Eurasia will control the parts of the Europe which will have fallen into utter chaos and balkanization. Such is also a part of the Nazbol program (read Thuletide's articles about NB for more information, links in the NB thread). They will nonetheless have a hard time taming India and the other Asian nations but you can count on a communist Eurasian block to achieve this with maximum prejudice.
>>11097 >The elites despise what China is and want to turn it into a liberal democracy. That is why they funded the Hong Kong protests and probably are funding a hell of a lot more in China. Liberals might do that, but China is well on its way to become mentally jewed. Only neocons who blindly believe in the American Empire meme might, might dislike China, but they're living in the past. Most of them have moved on onto accepting a total control of society on the basis of technology produced by Israel and China. In case you didn't understand, China is the current successful model we are being forced under. You should really look into how far the Social Credit system extends and also look at the economical ties that bind Israel and China as we speak. China has become an extremely materialistic, Talmudic nation. The real (((elites))) are at peace with China. >That is why they funded the Hong Kong protests and probably are funding a hell of a lot more in China. That again is probably organized by lower tier elites that still desperately want to preserve the Juedo-American hegemony, or perhaps are just doing it to keep China on its toes and remind it that the not-CCCP could be toppled too. >The jews do not like "big scary dictatorships" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASOVIETUNIONHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
(14.03 MB 320x240 Jesus on jews.mp4)
I am not a Christian myself, but I don't see Christianity as irreconcilable with national socialism or racial salvation in the same way as more recent modern ideologies like marxism or liberalism. Many White nationalities like the Greek and Serbs rely on their churches to maintain their racial and cultural identity and act as a shield against degeneracy. Even today most Whites seem to subscribe to some form of Christianity even if the religion as a whole is getting more mongrelized. In fact, Christianity seems to act as an incubator for the dharmic and platonic traditions that inspired it. Because of it's European influence, Christianity is far more Aryan in character than any living religion today. It would do us no good to reject White Christians out of hand, especially if they refrain from degeneracy and share anti-JQ sentiments.
>>11368 isn't the soviet union a good example for his point? the jews ended up having problems there.
>>11391 I'm not sure what the point of the guy in this video even was. First he says that the term 'Jew' doesn't appear in the beginning of the Bible at all, and then it doesn't appear (allegedly) until 2 Kings 16, but the king of Judah in that chapter that is driven out of Elath, Ahaz son of Jotham, is literally in the genealogy of Jesus according to Matthew 1:9. He emphasizes that 'Jacob Israel' is at war with Judah here, but then lambasts the ones who calls themselves Jews today for claiming to be Jews even though they are not, but instead they are the Synagogue of Satan. So is being a Jew good or bad if they are falsely using the name of Jew? (not even to mention that Jesus has descent from figures of Judah, as mentioned). This video was a clusterfuck, unless I am just failing to comprehend on a fundamental level here. This is what happens when someone tries to justify their counter-Semitism via the Bible, one gets a mess like this. The only counter-Semitism that can be justified from a Biblical perspective is non-racial. Ultimately the problem of Judaism in Christianity is that the majority of Jews rejected Jesus as the Messiah, and in doing so they became false Jews (as per the synagogue of Satan comment), but of course they are still of the same bloodline as Jesus, Paul and every other early Christian. >It would do us no good to reject White Christians out of hand, especially if they refrain from degeneracy and share anti-JQ sentiments. It really comes to how much they divert the movement off the tracks.
>>11356 >p-please stop deleting my pedo-posting!
>>11394 That's only because sheer tyranny and destruction of wealth and culture can only work that long before it falls apart. Stalin had an issue with some Jews close to him and within the politburo but overall he maintained the death penalty against antisemites. It changes nothing that at its beginning and for several decades, the USSR was precisely what the other anon said the Jews would loathe having power over, a big scary dictatorship.
>>11459 I guess this could be more accurately reworded to say that Jews fear big scary dictatorships that they exercise a high degree of control over. Then it becomes a wild-card. The Third Reich is the best example, of course. The early Soviet Union was completely controlled by Jews and pro-Jewish figureheads, so they did not have much reason to fear it for quite some time.
>>11459 >It changes nothing that at its beginning and for several decades, the USSR was precisely what the other anon said >>11461 >so they did not have much reason to fear it for quite some time. Right.. but I don't think anywhere in the discussion anyone was disputing jews having an outsized impact on the Soviet government. It was more about the illiberal mechanisms that eventually broke their grip on power internally, which also cropped up in a few other Warsaw Pact countries and China, to varying degrees. Everywhere jews exercise complete and total control -- the primary Allied nations and those under direct military rule -- liberal democracy is the system they implement under military force.
>>11471 > liberal democracy is the system they implement under military force. Only because they can use it to keep the population docile. Democracy is a meaningless term. It doesn't exist. Democratic states are all about population management. At a core level it's no different from something like the USSR.
>>11471 >Everywhere jews exercise complete and total control Because they're slower in these other countries. Communist is faster and more brutal but Jews burn up (no pun intended) quicker with this system. They exhaust their energy faster.Both Capitalism and Communism lead to the same conclusion. Russian Jews moved away from power and got back into business which admittedly is where they strive the most. >>11461 >I guess this could be more accurately reworded to say that Jews fear big scary dictatorships that they exercise a high degree of control over. I am not sure it makes any better sense worded that way. Didn't you mean that they fear such dictatorships upon which they have actually no control? That would be quite an obvious statement.
>>11473 >>11474 Okey doke, experterinos.
>>11088 but the disease argument only applies to sex involving penetration. It does not apply to intercrural sex. >Intercrural sex, also known as coitus interfemoris, thigh sex and interfemoral sex, is a type of non-penetrative sex, where the penis is placed between the receiving partner's thighs and thrusted to create friction. But i guess you are right regarding the lustful behavior and broken families of the gays.
>>12446 It's still weird as fuck. I don't mind if a woman were to rub man's penis between her thighs, with oil. I think most male to male friendships get too "overtly friendly" so they get confused as to how to let off the over happiness in being best friends as two males. Hence, gay sex? Again, this is just my theory. I still think faggotry ruined male to male best friends relations.
>>12446 Disease argument is only the tip of the iceberg, really.
(304.79 KB 868x2600 faggot gay lgbt.jpg)
>>12466 >? Even if a faggot is having exclusively intercrural sex (like that would ever happen), there is far more to criticize when it comes to homosexuals and their degeneracy than just the disease factor.
society should be run by rebels and outsiders who shift government structures through phases of development to avoid stagnation and idealistically end up at a stage of 99.9% proficiency. mating choice should be primarily up to males capitalism endangers free speech also the reason these rebels should run society is due to the fact most "social adept" people are also the most "domesticated" of society. I think its a fair trade
>>13396 >society should be run by rebels and outsiders Then they wouldn't be rebels or outsiders, they would be just the elite.
>>13396 you sound like a (((claremont))) shill.
>>13396 >>13416 Jews have eliminated the natural aristocracies of nations and replaced them with either Jews (who are the chandala caste and hence the anti-elite) or easily controllable clowns. We live in an inverted world.
>>13427 at this point I'm only vaguely associated with you guys and only come once in awhile to throw opinions down the well.
>>13416 by that I mean those who society claims on the lunatic fringe
>>13798 Society should be run by lunatics? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here.
(222.93 KB 972x647 ClipboardImage.png)
(272.36 KB 980x711 ClipboardImage.png)
(13.45 KB 739x116 ClipboardImage.png)
(1.44 MB 1210x795 ClipboardImage.png)
>>13800 You're talking with the autist Adolf Stalin who was arrested for throwing his mother down the stairs. He wants society ran by people with autism
>>13801 I'm usually not judgmental, but that dude is a scummy loser. >autism autism is unfit and dysgenic. we have social skills and intuitive thought because these mental capacities help us survive and prosper, and have been fine-tuned for millennia. we shouldn't accept autism, for the same reasons we shouldn't accept obesity, deformity, or retardation -- these things are bad for us as a species. if a person can't be fixed, they should be prevented from breeding and kept out of sight, not accommodated by institutions. that reminds me, even back in my blue-pilled days, I couldn't help noticing things about old footage of Nazi Germany, and how it seemed like a great place to live. not just the clean orderly streets, but the people seemed fit and well-dressed, with a notable lack of fatties, uglies, and dysgenic retards. last but not least, everyone was White.
>>13834 Mild autists are the last dam against mass miscegenation that was brought by oversocialized cattle whose "social skills" told them to listen to the Jews. People with serious cases of autism belong in the bog though.
>>13848 I’m not even sure if what are called ‘mild autists’ really have anything wrong with them. I am a bit of a socially awkward and introverted person myself who comes off to normalfags as weird at times, but I think has more to do with how I was raised and how I spent most of my time back in the day (reading, internet, video games) more than anything else. They are square pegs who just don’t fit into the circular hole of Jewish wage-slave society. Eccentricity, limited social skills, and a resistance to mass-brainwashing are not a neurodevelopmental disorder per se. Regardless though, I am being pedantic towards something beyond the point. The type of people you are talking about have definitely proved very receptive to redpills. ‘Mild autists’ have lots of time on their hands, and so lots of time to research controversial topics, and certainly no reason to care about negative societal reactions towards their beliefs.
>>13852 It's considered to be a spectrum, from being a bit socially awkward and having unusual interests to being unable to interact with your environment and talk with other people. Internet autists and "schizos" (as a modern phenomenon) had their roles in organic societies, it's just that, as you said, they don't fit into the Jewish machinery. That doesn't make them dysgenic, but the exact opposite. The Jew, like HIV, programs the society to attack it's own immune cells. Of course, the extreme cases that are completely dysfunctional should be euthanized.
It's important to be knowledgeable on the Palestinian issue and to spread this knowledge, because it shows what the jews plan on doing to all the goyim what they do openly to the Palestinian without a murmur of reproach, and because it will de-program the normies from their jew-worship and eternal-victim culture.
>>13871 Agreed. They should be supported on principle. They are victims of the Jews and a perfect way to slowly begin to introduce normalfags to Jewish supremacy and the JQ at large. There will be feds and other losers who will say not to focus on them because they’re not White, but they need to just be kicked to the curb. Even William Luther Pierce celebrated heroes like Wafa Idris, and Hitler allied with them as well. Judea delenda est.
>>13871 >>13875 >Even William Luther Pierce celebrated heroes like Wafa Idris Hey illiterates, read his final chapter of Turner Diaries. Then you'd know what WLP had in mind.
>>13848 there's an important distinction between mild autists & introverts (I'm an introvert myself) versus severe cases. by "social skills", I don't mean the oversocialization that Ted taught me about (slavishly following trends, popular opinion, and validation), I mean the basic ability to function as a person, read others and relate to them. I have no problem with mild autists, they have in fact proven themselves quite useful in cuckchan raids. my post was really aimed at the more serious cases that can't be treated or integrated, they are just another kind of human glitch that pulls us away from eugenic ideals. a couple other points I just thought of: I've noticed that globohomo goes out of its way to nurture dysgenic freaks and invalids who don't belong in any healthy gene pool. also, reflecting on oversocialization, I think this plays a role in the tranny epidemic.
>>13901 The Turner Diaries was written, in part, for shock value. Pierce openly supported movements within other races that were aligned with his own cause. He supported Arabs, Palestinians and Indians among others. The final part of the Turner Diaries was written for drama. It ends with a completely White earth that is 100% at peace, which is unrealistic to say the least. Fighting would inevitably break out among the different nations at that point. If everyone is White, then no one is. Pierce knew that, just like everyone else with a triple digit IQ. The Turner Diaries serves as a tool to get people into a revolutionary mindset. The last part was just a "shoot for the stars and you'll reach the moon" kind of thing.
>>13913 >my post was really aimed at the more serious cases that can't be treated or integrated, they are just another kind of human glitch that pulls us away from eugenic ideals Those are functionally no different from people with Down's syndrome, simply broken. No point in keeping them around. >I've noticed that globohomo goes out of its way to nurture dysgenic freaks and invalids who don't belong in any healthy gene pool They are the ones most likely to be dependent on the system and to be it's strongest supporters. On the other hand, they can give little to no resistance. It's no different from christcucks refusing to abort children with serious genetic defects. Abrahamists (including Marxists) love the weak, sickly, degenerate and subhuman, because it's from their weaknesses, flaws and suffering that Jews derive power. It also feeds their god. >also, reflecting on oversocialization, I think this plays a role in the tranny epidemic It plays a role in every cultural phenomenon. Most people perceive reality through the cultural matrix, as it's objects. As such, they are helpless against the influences of the cultural priests. And it's not only because of the external pressure, it's because they base their own, inner identity on such frameworks. With sufficient knowledge of neurology and psychology, it's not too difficult to gradually rewire their neural pathways responsible for sexual stimulation to be receptive to different stimuli. This is also how they have managed to rewire White women to find beastmen attractive, that was even easier because women are much more socially sensitive and culturally receptive by nature.
(58.15 KB 500x400 1623327879150.jpg)
(91.30 KB 500x350 Bhalswa-Slum-Delhi.jpg)
(925.30 KB 2000x1350 Mexico slums.jpg)
(432.46 KB 649x753 Microplastics.png)
>>13919 We are at a point in human history, where have no choice but to exterminate lesser hominids if we want to continue to exist and have a future for White children. This planet is being made uninhabitable by swarms of parasitic sub-humans that pollute, waste and destroy everything they come into contact with. This cycle cannot go on. Either we kill them, or they destroy this planet killing themselves and taking us down with them. Is it even necessary to explain what China alone does to the natural landscape?
>>13925 >They are the ones most likely to be dependent on the system and to be it's strongest supporters.
>>13901 >some fictional novel versus Pierce's actual words in a radio broadcast Yeah, I think I know which ones I'll put more credence in. >>13927 I hate to break it to you, but per capita Westerners consume and waste far more wastefully than some third-world shitskin. We made their countries like this so we could do this at home.
(314.91 KB 500x375 1561557464141.png)
(299.40 KB 1766x1242 1622818170526.jpg)
(5.04 MB 2048x1821 3 year old.png)
(115.30 KB 827x1024 1590468903584.jpg)
>>13932 Return to their own countries will not suffice. This is a modern world with rapid communications, transport and other technology. We have tried separation from non-Whites countless times and has never succeeded. We have encountered lesser humans and concluded that they are inferior and stipulated laws that as long as we live near them we must never let them in among ourselves and we must never mix with them. Then we let them in, mix with them and perish. Every single time. Remove every non-White now, and two generations later people will re-accommodate them claiming “It’s not going to do anything if we just let a few of them in” much like the arrival of Africans as freed slaves in dockside settlements such as Canning Town, Liverpool and Cardiff in Victorian Britain. One century later, London has become a wasteland where the invaders comprise the majority of the population. If the Roman Empire had killed every last Jew, then our current situation wouldn't exist. “The attractions of the vast and rich Orient for one Nordic conqueror after another are obvious. What is unfortunate is that none made racial considerations the basis of his program of conquest—and it could have been done. Alexander, for example, could have laid the foundations for a Nordic empire which could have stood against the rest of the world—including Rome—forever. The Macedonians and the Greeks shared common blood and had similar languages (ancient Macedonian was an altogether different language from modern Macedonian, which has its roots in the sixth century c.e. conquest of Macedonia by Slavic tribes). If, before invading Asia and defeating the Asian armies, Alexander had devoted his energies to forging just these two peoples into a unified population base, casting out all the alien elements which had accumulated in Greece by the latter part of the fourth century b.c.e.; and if, while conquering Asia, he had carried out a policy of total extermination—then he could have colonised Asia with Nordic settlements from the Indus to the Nile, and they could have multiplied freely and expanded into the empty lands without danger of racial mixing. But Alexander did not cleanse Greece of its Semitic merchants and moneylenders and its accumulated rabble of half-breeds, and he chose to base his Asiatic empire on the indigenous populations instead of on colonists. And so the Greco-Macedonian world, despite its uninterrupted prosperity and its maintenance of the appearance of might after Alexander’s death, continued its imperceptible downward slide toward oblivion.” —César Tort, On Exterminationism
(1.34 MB 696x1024 1625987484293.png)
(131.52 KB 676x767 1624080410779.jpg)
(996.99 KB 1131x1280 1621938515692.png)
>>13941 Industrial society was created by White people for White people. Through colonization, christian missionary work and corruption, White technology was implemented in non-White inhabited lands and bequeathed to them as part of decolonization. The effects of non-Whites holding industrial technology have been disastrous. The full scope of the problem is still partly unknown. Our enemies posses nuclear weapons capable of killing millions of people. In China, more than 500 million citizens drink filthy, polluted water, and almost every urban area has critically polluted air that is unsafe to breathe. The lower hominids have used technology to putrefy the planet we live on, making enormous stretches of land and water uninhabitable. In Central Africa, Brazil, and Indonesia, millions of square kilometers of tropical rainforest have been erased and replaced by monotonous agriculture to feed their rapidly expanding populations. 10 rivers carry 90% of the plastic entering the oceans. Two of them are in Africa – the Nile and the Niger – while the others are in Asia: the Indus, Ganges, Amur, Mekong, Pearl, Hai he, Yellow and Yangtze. The Yangtze River in China carries up to 1.5 million tonnes of plastic into the sea every year. In contrast, the Thames puts 18 tonnes of plastic into the ocean. The Oceans will become barren and fish global fish stocks will collapse if the population of non-Whites keeps growing. Water is the precondition for all life on Earth. Rivers are the veins of the planet, the lifeblood of civilization. All of the ten most polluted rivers in the world are in non-White inhabited countries. This pollution – Industrial chemicals, pesticides, fertilizer, plastics, urban waste, and other toxins – kills the life in the rivers and oceans, creating massive die-offs of marine life, insects, frogs and birds. It also turns the formerly clear water streams and rivers into murky brown channels of waste that unusable for any form of human use unless thoroughly cleansed. Dams also impact water quality Dams impede the very functionality of rivers and planetary life cycle processes. The Aral Sea in Kazakhstan is an example of a major water body almost being emptied by uncontrolled extraction of its in-flowing water for irrigation. Another example is Lake Chad. It was Africa’s third largest lake but now 90% empty because of irresponsible over-extraction. In China, Hubei, once known as the “Province of 1000 Lakes” has lost 900 of them to development and land mismanagement. There are many lakes at risk of disappearing across the world, and ground water is also extracted irresponsibly. Even in countries such as the United States which holds great amounts of fresh water, water availability will become critical in the south-western region.
(267.26 KB 990x649 the invasion front.jpg)
(110.69 KB 950x633 hindu01.jpg)
Rapid population growth is happening exclusively in non-White countries. India had a population of 388,997,955 in 1941. India now has a population of more than 1.38 Billion and is increasing. The Population of Nigeria has increased from 37 million to 206 million since 1950. The Population of Pakistan has increased from 37 million to 220 million since 1950. As more people on the planet compete for the same finite resources, worldwide famine and drought will soon become a reality. It is predicted that the world’s population in the 2050s will require a 60% increase in food production – and supplying that will entail an expansion of 20% in global water use. In addition to that there will be an increase of water use for industrial and domestic use in homes and factories. This would raise the share of world freshwater required by farming to 79%. In many countries where the demand for water is greater than the supply this will lead to war. China, India, and Pakistan will most likely be first to experience this water resource crisis. Pakistan maintains that India is stealing its water. In a massive drought scenario, the two nations would certainly go to war, and likely use nuclear weapons. The agricultural lands of the world are rapidly being depleted. The natural result of soil depletion and desertification is famine. 45% of the United Kingdom’s food is imported. Most of America’s fruit is imported. To feed their own famine-stricken populations in non-White countries, they will stop exporting food to other nations. This means that the availability of bananas, cocoa products, sugar, and imported foodstuffs will in turn collapse. Productive soils are degrading globally. The world’s fertile farmlands are wasting away. The food chain is fragile; truck drivers not working, diseases affecting livestock, antibiotic resistance, pests, bad harvests, crop failures, can be catastrophic when a nation no longer receives imports. Food and Water scarcity works as an accelerant to conflict. Key food production areas will be heavily fought over. 44% of Nigeria is cultivated land. 57% of India is cultivated land. 65.5% of Bangladesh is cultivated land. Agriculture replaces the natural habitat of native flora and flora; killing the biodiversity. The land that is used for planting crops is squandered and the soil becomes degraded. This putrefaction of the planet is unsustainable.
(492.75 KB 1024x768 004.png)
(356.38 KB 1024x768 014.png)
(342.91 KB 1024x768 913.png)
(410.87 KB 1024x768 841.png)
(547.65 KB 1024x768 066.png)
Our existence is a struggle, and lesser hominids are our competition. The only way to truly secure the existence of our people is to completely eradicate the Jewish parasite and create the Ethnoglobe. To win this racial struggle we must be pragmatic. This means nothing is too extreme to avert our destruction. You are the destroyer or become destroyed. There is no alternative. The youngest generation is the bearer of demographic destiny. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Thus, all racial enemies – no matter how young – must be killed. Aryans eliminating inferior hominids is Natural Selection. With large mammals it is incredibly easy to create a mass extinction event. Many animals have been threatened by extinction by man or actually been made extinct, even when that was never the intent. Numerous peoples have been exterminated throughout the times with far more primitive means available than what we have today such as Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons. In order to secure the existence of our people and a future for White children, all Jews must be exterminated. The crisis in our lands has reached a critical stage, and there is no other option. Any other action simply permits them to plot their revival and launch a new offensive against us. The population of Negros in Africa has escalated to numbers which the land can no longer support. Negros are uncivilized animals. They are life unworthy of life. To allow this vermin to even exist and continue multiplying makes an utter mockery of all the White victims who have been murdered by Negros and is unacceptable. A mass extinction event can be created artificially by violently seizing control over the most essential resources – food and water – creating mass starvation and millions of deaths from no access to water. Cities can be erased by kinetic orbital strikes and population centers can be devastated by nerve gas. That is the actualization and solution to an evolutionary biological struggle that has been ongoing for thousands of years. AVENGE OUR FALLEN RACIAL KINSFOLK SOLVE THE PROBLEM ONCE AND FOR ALL TIME
>>13943 Those posters trying to appropriate the term minority are always so cute in a cringe kind of way. The reason is because they fundamentally misunderstand the root of the issue. Face it, NOBODY CARES ABOUT MINORITIES. In fact, EVERYBODY HATES MINORITIES. Communists and jews run away from them at every opportunity. Minorities are ugly, filthy and disgusting. So why would you use it to refer to yourself? The reason why the word minority has any clout is because it brings social status to the user when it's used to advocate for niggers and other reprobates. This is a consequence of jewish propagand and manipulation of media in their hateful persecution of people of European descent. So, when you try to flip the term... it just feels like you're dumb and you misunderstood something. The average twitter jewish prostitute and cuckservative is not a good actor, they're not interested in helping minorities. They're interested in jumping through jewish hoops like the good little dogs that they are in order to get a pat on the head from their jewish masters. And that's why even the most sympathetic person to the cause of European Heritage and self-determination will most likely just feel icky and roll their eyes when they see those.
>>13942 >>13943 >>13944 Law of /pol/ : The probability of someone mentioning that the all-or-nothing solution is the only one increases to 1 as more time passes, when someone else suggests a peaceful solution. It's a truth no one wants to think about.
>>13945 >don't point out we are called the majority despite being 3% of the world population They already call Whites "majority minority" in the town I am from which went from 95% White to 35% in two decades. Lugenpresse will play both sides and call us majority when it's politically convenient one way (to mask our ethnic replacement), and minority when it's politically convenient the other way (to justify taking away our power, like in South Africa).
>>13946 It's the usual agitators who never offer a plan how to achieve the so called "all-or-nothing" solution given the overwhelmingly negative circumstances. Their goal is to incite awake Whites to perform self-destructive acts that would not only eliminate them individually, but also serve as a pretext for further violent actions and repression against other Whites. Unfortunately, we do not have kinetic orbital weapons
(326.77 KB 1200x800 1620222761720.jpg)
(3.19 MB 1857x2500 Javan leopard.jpg)
(2.87 MB 1920x1280 Pongo_tapanuliensis_female.jpg)
(604.13 KB 998x2268 DoD Deradicalization online.png)
>>13965 >It's the usual agitators who never offer a plan how to achieve the so called "all-or-nothing" solution given the overwhelmingly negative circumstances. I have presented a plan and it is feasible. I'm pragmatic about the resources of this planet, and I have presented my case why it should be us in control of these resources instead of non-Whites. And that's only one argument. There's also the fact that one of the core principles of National Socialist thought is accordance with the natural order. Shitskins are making thousands of species of animals extinct, and turning rainforests into wastelands. >Their goal is to incite awake Whites to perform self-destructive acts that would not only eliminate them individually, but also serve as a pretext for further violent actions and repression against other Whites. We take back our countries and then work on fixing the world. Whataboutism and "what if they hurt us blah" is one of the primary DoD deradicalization tactics. They are openly genociding us as we speak Innaction is racial suicide. Millions of Whites are already as good as dead after taking the clot shot and will die within the next 3 years, and the ZOG is preparing for mopping up operations on all the unvaxxed, which is well underway already with "quarantine" concentration camps already built.
>>13973 >Innaction is racial suicide I agree, when will you actually act?
>>14041 >We are, and have always been, the eternal victims of history. Stop being a black-pilling fag
>>14041 >the eternal victims of history. Pfff Hahaha, did you miss the 250 years in which Europeans colonized Africa, India, South America, Australia, China (not for very long admittedly), and completely destroyed the races inhabiting North America and took their lands for their own? Holy fuck, like 75 years have sucked for us, It's bad but nowhere near extinction bad. For all the blackpilling about the vaxx being sterilizing, I'm not even certain that it is so. There have still been births by the vaxxed. It may be a million different experiments, or something else entirely. We have no idea. Furthermore, as far as the argument of "there are so many more of them than us": Do you realize the whole planet is about to enter a period of decline, with crop failure and water shortage abound? How well do you think the hoards of Africa will survive? 60% of them will likely die off in various crises before that period ends. Even if they attempt an immigration Zerg rush, it is not possible that a majority survive - There are no physical logistical means by which they can immigrate. You cannot predict the future, you just want to be a sad sack. Fuck off, nigger.
If having the balls to admit that our fate is sealed makes me a faggot, then I don't know what is wrong with this board anymore.
>>14046 <wah wah this whole board sucks because they arent blackpilled faggots like i am so fuck off? stop pretending your bullshit belongs here.
>>14046 Because extinction isn't our sealed fate. There are still nearly 650 million of us. 770 million if you count non-Siberian Russians.
>>14046 resident blackpiller constantly shilling the same old shit. maybe take your own advice and end it, faggot.
>For all the blackpilling about the vaxx being sterilizing, I'm not even certain that it is so. There have still been births by the vaxxed. It may be a million different experiments, or something else entirely. We have no idea. That could be due to the fact that some people are immune or highly resistant to it. Gene therepy is essentially infecting someone with a virus to alter their DNA, so some people's immune systems could fend it off before it causes any damage, hence the boosters. They're injected with a virus essentially, more or less, like the Black Plague. If the black plague was 100% fatal, our race would've been dead already. With every disease or bioweapon, there's bound to be people who are immune or highly resistant , and that's what the vaccines, to a greater extent, are: engineered viruses in syringe form . The Jews are injecting us with poison in the same way they poisoned our populace via the black plague through our drinking water, by putting plague infected corpses from their merchent ships into our wells. >14048 >Because extinction isn't our sealed fate. There are still nearly 650 million of us. 770 million if you count non-Siberian Russians. Soon to be 400 million, even if the Vax is not a sterilization/depopulation tool, as it is killing White boomers off in droves where I live. That's what the vax probably is designed to do, hasten the death of the boomer generation for the great reset, as young Whites are outnumbered massively. I am not a blackpilled faggot, but time is of the essence, and if we don't secure an ethnostate before the boomers are dead, I am afraid that's that. And with the vaccine, they'll die five years ahead of schedule, I am certain. We need them.
>>14050 What exactly is the existence of boomers forestalling? I have to disagree with you here. Their only contribution to preventing demographic change is existing (doesn't mean much) and VOOTing which means even less. The shift of a population from older to younger generally means more volatility and growth, not less. I'm not entirely convinced we need them to better our position at all.
If the Germans had won, the movie industry would have been bland, filled with a mandatory sludge of productions ranging from boring and heavy handed cliché romanticism to forced super aryan tropes with the obliged no-fun German culture. American movies from the 30s are mostly boring and try way too hard to be lesson givers. Imagine that, a hundred times.
>>14091 this post is so brainlet, I don't know where to begin.
>>14091 <if germans won we couldnt get excited to watch mindless murder porn 2: son of rapist serial killer or high school casual sex 6 gee, that just sounds so horrible. wont you think of the empty pastimes, goyim?
>>14091 ok I'll respond to this >assuming cultural output would stay exactly the same as the 1930's >calling the culture that invented Oktoberfest "no fun" and as >>14108 said, much of modern pop culture is sensationalist, mindless drivel, shat out by an industry seeking to satisfy the lowest common denominator for shekels. if National Socialism had won, the world would've developed and evolved along very different lines, based on Volkish consciousness and Natural Law. as it is, the central bankers won, and we live in the pozzed world they built.
>>14045 >There have still been births by the vaxxed. The majority of vaxxed fetuses will die before birth and the very few that do, look like this - a life of unimaginable suffering and pain caused by a Jewish made injection of graphene, mRNA technology which provides immunity to nothing, causes blood clots and disables your immune system.
>>14112 Are you just pulling this out of your ass? Because I have heard nothing even anecdotally of the vax causing birth defects. I don't trust the VAERS data but even so, miscarriage and birth defects are pretty rarely reported even by social media and alt media.
>>14091 Glad to see your industry dying, Herschel. Thanks for dropping by.
>>14091 Oh no, you mean Hitler wouldn't give me my biannual Marvel movies??
>>14129 Hitler wouldn't have made such high art as Supernigger Saves the World or a Jacob's Ladder remake with an all-black cast. Nazis BTFO once again. Checkmate, dumbass.
>>14047 Stop responding to niggerpiller and report him only. He's a turkroach liberal.
>>14091 You have a point. I'm gonna miss vidya if that happened. Oh well that's what sacrifices are for.
>>14149 >You have a point. He doesn't. The NSDAP supported a positive form of freedom of expression, something that was more life-affirming within art. Works such as fantasy were not banned for being fictional or because it fails to talk about the greatness of Hitler everday. Most of Germany's artworks are usually propganda because of the war effort. Anon is also likely the niggerpiller within this thread who has outed himself as a soyboy.
<[Moderate thread] Did something happen there? There were several posts that just disappeared.
>>14252 It was the same pedoposter shill and two anons responding back.
>>14256 It was more pedoshilling. I deleted the replies to him in case he came back and was to post more.
>>14112 The way that baby jitters is so unsettling to me.
>>14112 Go back to Infowars, retard.
(42.78 KB 680x471 tiresome hitler.jpg)
>>14091 Dumb post. If the Third Reich had won, there would be no reason for romanticism and for dwelling on it. Sure, romantic themes are perennial in their appeal, but to be stuck in a mire of romanticism is a symptom of discontentment with the present. I have some romantic sensibilities myself, but I am keenly aware that ultimately it is rooted in what I said, a yearning for the 'good ole days'. Too much romanticism is just like escapism in its toxic influence. We should be focusing on the future right here and now, and not crying over the past. Excessive concern with the past and using it to beat the present is a sickness. The Third Reich would have actualized itself, and it would have, in a sense, been forward-looking and not endlessly navel-gazing. They had begun to realize the ideal. The question is whether the Third Reich could have truly created an alternative modernity free of many of the social ills today. I am in some sense skeptical, but I know the rot would have been far slower if Hitler had won.
>>14091 >Nooo, not my movierinos! Not my precious modern tropes! As if a boring diarrhea with no meaningful plot, educational or artistic value whose only goal is to promote race-mixing, degeneracy, passive detachment from reality and consumerism that gets published today is worth keeping. I'd rather watch old German documentaries about machine maintenance than (((Netflix))). >>15112 Both the past and the future are important, we would likely see something like archaeological futurism.
>>15123 Yes, you're right. The past would not be scorned. That too is a harmful attitude. Our present would then be more in line with our past, and we would not be dwelling on it harmfully, but we would also not just throw it away.
(220.20 KB 671x590 Nietzsche 2.jpg)
Nietzsche identified the problems that we face, and many of the problems that were going to come about in the future as a result of the descent of Europe and the West into nihilism and decadence, but ultimately his project is a failure, and his Übermensch would not fix the West.
>>15411 Übermensch fixes everything. Societies are made of people, the better the people, the better the society. Kikes like having societies full of subhumans and last men because they can easily rule them and sell them their "solutions" that never work. Quality of people is more important than any political or economical system.
>>15421 I'm just not sure if it would work in any way like he thinks it would. Where I'm definitely on board is where he says in The Gay Science that he welcomes any and all signs that a more virile, warlike age is upon us. In this section he lauds them as 'preparatory human beings' those who will come, those who seek in all things that which is to be overcome in them, and he also celebrates living dangerously, to live at war with your fellows and with yourselves, to be robbers and conquerors, etc. I certainly don't fault such an attitude. It is a far healthier one. And this is really the sort of men that appeared for a time in the 1920s and 1930s. What I question is whether anything that comes out this can really cope with the 'death of God' that Nietzsche talks about it. In this famous section on that topic, he is very clear that this is a momentous and chaotic era, not to be underestimated in its significance. It signifies, of course, the collapse of all absolutes, values, direction in history, etc. I'm just not sure whether the feeling of absence or lack can be overcome in the way that he thinks it can, it seems pretty innate to human beings. This said, I'm more Nietzschean than not in a lot of things.
(133.54 KB 500x381 bomber harris.png)
I don't really hate any race other than jews, although I can understand why someone would. Second would probably be arabs since islam is basically judaism for goyim but even still I respect certain aspects of the culture. Anglos have historically kind of sucked too but they're still White so I hold out hope for them
Some I believe are: >just because you were charged with domestic violence doesn't mean you can't own a gun >landlords should have no right to decide whether their tenants own weapons or not >some private ownership must be recinded to allow free speech >aoc should be reduced >the punishment for aborting your kid should be murder >miscegenation should be treated the same way, no exceptions That should be it
>>15992 I think Jews are really the only ones that give off to me a sort of vibe of 'metaphysical evil'. My opinions on the other races vary. I mainly think that they just vary in intelligence and natural traits and behaviors, and some are more tolerable than others. Forced diversity and them being funneled into White countries is the main problem.
If you don't hate races outside your own, then you are a faggot and retard. Note that the ones who say they don't hate jews or blacks are degenerates.
>>16027 Define 'hate'. If you mean some fuming, frothing at the mouth rage, that is dumb and self-defeating. No one in the past ever acted like this. A good concern for one's own and protecting White interests is what is needed. Deriving your energy from hatred is retarded, derive it from love of your people, which will protect it all costs.
>>15992 Get rid of the jews and see how many problems solve themselves. They should be the main goal, any irredentist, dogmatic, or ideological spats come 2nd.
>>16043 Getting rid of biological Jews though does not uproot Jewish memeplexes from the population. The memeplex was really the only good idea that Dawkins ever made.
>>16027 Whatever nigga. I try to keep people of other races, especially jews, at arms length since I know they have their own interests and may or may not be trustworthy. But that doesn't have to mean blind hatred. I would rather fight the ZOG side by side with an afrocentrist pagan than a White christcuck since at least the former has transcended jew worship. Not saying I want to mass import africans or have black kids but I do think the jew is the primary enemy of all mankind. But even some mischlinge can be alright. Granted I've never met a kike that wasn't insufferable but I imagine they exist in small numbers
>>16014 Exactly. Even if you believe that IQ is a worthwhile measure of human intelligence that doesn't mean blacks are irredeemable. I have lower expectations for them in general but there have been a few standouts in history like Malcolm and Garvey. Even Minister Farrakhan is right a lot of the time
>>16442 >Even if you believe that IQ is a worthwhile measure of human intelligence that doesn't mean blacks are irredeemable. I have lower expectations for them in general but there have been a few standouts in history like Malcolm and Garvey. First of all, you're sounding like a cuckservative civic nationalist and secondly no, Malcolm thought his fragile race was superior than Whites and wanted to force White Americans to accept niggers as citizens and give them land they've never earned he's a cotton picker and I don't care if he hated Jews and worked with American NS. A niggers are totally worthless and are as evil as the Jews.
(129.06 KB 1024x952 1632837279210.jpg)
>>16450 I never said I wanted blacks in government or even living in the same areas as White folks, but so long as we're all cooped up in this prisonhouse of nations (america) together we may as well fight against our common enemies. The ideal situation would be balkanisation with blacks getting a few southern states to themselves as a consolation but it isn't like we couldn't deport them back to Africa, too And Malcolm stopped being a supremacist when he left the NOI. He openly reached out to both Whites and black moderates like MLK >wanted to force White Americans to accept niggers as citizens Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm's mentor, straight up acknowledged that blacks were never meant to be American citizens. That's why he wanted to seperate >and give them land they've never earned How many more years of slavery would it take for them to earn that land? >niggers are totally worthless and are as evil as the Jews. Totally disagree, I think they would do much better for themselves if allowed to go it alone instead of being kept under the thumbs of Whites as an underpaid underclass. The current state of affairs is bad for all sides. I hardly blame them for lashing out when this society treats them so unfairly
>>16452 >I hardly blame them for lashing out when this society treats them so unfairly Your argument falls apart when jews are more than happy to give concessions to niggers in order to spite Whites. They are treated more than fairly- they are given whatever they want. Jews do this because they know it hurts Whites and niggers will always be their goy slaves because they're too dumb to create functioning governments which oppose ZOG.
>>16452 >we may as well fight against our common enemies Why do people keep believing this shit? We have many enemies, and many of those are golems of jews. And even if they might seem independent of the jews, they still need to be removed. They are also my enemy. There is no point in working with them. That's the same shit civcucks do all the fucking time. Fuck niggers. Fuck niggerlovers. Fuck people who suggests bullshit like working with niggers.
>>16454 You're another purity spiraling shill. I see a lot of you lately. It's clear you're a Jew when even Hitler is a civnat by your standard.
>>16456 Hitler allied with foreign nations with their own lands and governments. That's not really comparable with "allying" with a group of genetic foreigners in your own lands. First of all, they are not a cohesive group and second they do not share any goals. They want to invade and leech and you want them gone. If a black separatist movement wants take 10 million of them back to Liberia, I'll give them a boat. Until then, get fucked.
(124.35 KB 1024x803 1632880648333m.jpg)
>>16453 This is simply not true. Sure, intelligent blacks are tokenised by big corporations via affirmative action policies but that hasn't done much to uplift the black population as a whole. Watch some videos of people driving around black ghettos in Detroit, Gary, Camden, or other places and try to tell me with a straight face that "structural racism" isn't a thing. Hell, it was even illegal for niggas to learn how to read for hundreds of years. You don't just free people on paper and expect them be instantly equal. That's why sharecropping became a thing. It takes a lot of work to overcome generations of neglect and trauma and it makes me chuckle how other Whites see tokenisation and immediately think "I'm being genocided!" like the stonetoss comic The jew has always been the enemy of all mankind. He stole his religion from the africans and forced it on europeans and arabs via trickery
>>16458 >Sure, intelligent blacks are tokenised by big corporations via affirmative action policies This is an anti-White policy to prioritize an inferior racial group and to marginalize Whites. > try to tell me with a straight face that "structural racism" isn't a thing. It does exist, for White people only. Niggers get everything from the government, welfare, affirmative action, etc. and create their own problems. >Hell, it was even illegal for niggas to learn how to read for hundreds of years They still can't read lol
>>16459 Structural racism exists for everyone but jews because we live in a jewish supremacist system. Welfare is designed to keep people poor and destroy families, you aren't allowed to get bennies if you make over a certain amount or live with the father of your children for example. Elijah Muhammad spoke against it for that exact reason. And in any case no amount of money can make up for the hundreds of years of trauma we're talking about. Blacks will continue to suffer and act out so long as they live in a system that was never designed to help them succeed. That's why they need land and self-determination
>>16460 >That's why they need land and self-determination Boy, if only there were a continent containing 20 countries which are 90% genetically similar they could easily move to. Too bad they have such strict immigration control and high cost of living. Not like half a dozen of them offered cash money to move there and start a business, that would be fucking crazy.
>>16460 Elijah Muhammad was an enemy of the White race. Fuck niggers. Have you not heard of the zebra murders? At minimum 15, over 75+ maximum White people were killed by these black Muslims. Even more spin-offs of NOI like Yahweh ben Yahweh’s Nation of Yahweh have led to the murders of nine innocent Whites.
>>16464 >Yahweh ben Yahweh’s Nation of Yahweh kek idk even know what you're talking about that's just a funny name yes the black Muslim mafia was fucked I'm not trying to defend them, are there are certainly anti-White aspects to Master Fard's teaching. But the fact remains that I would more readily trust a black muslim specifically in regard to the fight against the jew than a White christcuck. At least the muslims want separation, whereas those Whites expect to dominate our communities and force their own brand of wewuzzing jewry on us. I don't want to live in an old testament theocracy any more than our current nihilistic postmodern dystopia. They're two sides of the same shekel >>16463 Garvey founded the back to Africa movement and Elijah Muhammad saw it as a viable option as well. Certainly the latter didn't believe White people had it in their hearts to give blacks land let alone independence Black nationalists would make good allies TEMPORARILY that's all I'm saying
>>16458 >Detroit, Gary, Camden, or other places and try to tell me with a straight face that "structural racism" isn't a thing >literal commie jew schizo babble >we wuz kangz Christianity is derived Greece and theirs is from the Nordic Pantheon you retard which predates even the Vedas. Niggers have never created a religion its always been given to them hence the we wuz kangz. thats called nigger logic and shucking responsibility you trash faggot. You are leaving out the fact Europeans have been longest enslaved race while also managing to be the most powerful and got forced out of Asia from brown over population. The Irish have been perpetual slaves and were the main slaves in the USA. Today they are considered the most successful ethnic group while being the target of jews and anti-White policies even today the Irish culture was stolen by blacks blues, rapping, rock all invented by the Irish including the southern drawl that ebonics pools from. The negro has been given more gifts than other racial group and personally has been prevented form being Genocided by Europeans. All of that was a mistake, too much help has been given to the black man.
>>16468 because all they want to do is fuck White women and further the pollution while never having to risk anything because they can just blend in with the shitskin wave.
>>16465 ONE WHITE OLD MAN DEFEATED THE ENTIRE SIERRA LEONES ARMY THAT HAD ENGLISH WEAPONRY VS A APACHE. Why do you faggots underestimate White fighting ability when we have never lost a open war. Not even islam won a war they had to overpopulate Turkey and North Africa. The wouldn't the black nationalist would cost you your life, loyalty is a White Mans trait. Niggers can't fight but they will back stab you. You have so little experience with niggers or life you foolish nig kissing zoomer.
(123.82 KB 720x960 fabrique des negres.jpg)
>>16458 >was even illegal for niggas to learn how to read for hundreds of years. You don't just free people on paper and expect them be instantly equal Sure. But this wasn't the case for niggers in Great Britain, France, Sweden, Germany, or Italy and they are still overwhelmingly, disproportionately dumb and violent.
>>16465 >kek idk even know what you're talking about that's just a funny name Look it up, nigger. You're literally saying that you'd trust a group that has killed dozens of White people over a White Christian! You are literally retarded. These niggers would kill you in an instant. They're animals. https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/03/the-saga-of-yahweh-ben-yahweh/
>>16477 You do realise that tiny cult doesn't represent all black muslims, right? Elijah Muhammad taught his followers not to even carry weapons. And I'm not saying that I trust them more than White christians irt White interests, merely fighting against the jew. Muslims have a better grasp on the JQ in general, probably because they see jesus as just another prophet instead of worshipping him, a literal jew. You're putting words in my mouth
(85.55 KB 467x700 Cute and funny.jpg)
1.National Socialism =/= fascism 2.National Socialism is trad and based, while fascism was futuristic and technocratic 3.National socialism is the only unpozzed ideology that ever existed, all other ideologies including Monarchy, anarchism, communism, liberalism and to an extent fascism are pozzed garbage. 4.Mussolini was a kikeloving mednigger and an incompetent statesman >Sarfatti was born in Venice, the daughter of Amedeo Grassini and Emma Levi (whose cousin Giuseppe Levi was the father of Natalia Ginzburg). Amedeo was a wealthy Jewish lawyer and businessman. 5.Italy is cringe for not officially banning homosexuality unlike NatSoc Germany 6.D'Annunzio was a massive degenerate 7.Fiume was a cesspool of degeneracy 8.BUF was garbage since it was filled with degenerates like Rotha and Hawkins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotha_Lintorn-Orman >Dependent on alcohol and drugs,[17] rumours about her private life began to damage her reputation, until her mother stopped her funding amid lurid tales of drink, drugs and orgies.[18] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Francis_Hawkins >Francis Hawkins was a descendant of the sailor John Hawkins.[31] A salesman of surgical instruments by trade,[32] he never married and it has been claimed he was gay. >he was gay 9.The ironguards are cringe since they were christCUCKS 10.Cultured thug is a kike for denouncing White nationalism
>>16503 It's strange, I had the image you attached saved on my computer for the longest time, and just today I was looking for it, but was unable to find it. And then you post it. Talk about a coincidence. Most of your points I agree with in one sense or another. >8.BUF was garbage since it was filled with degenerates like Rotha and Hawkins Was Lintorn-Orman even a member of the BUF at any time? Wikipedia seems to be claiming that she was a co-founder of the British Fascists. This part dissolved into the BUF by 1934, and Lintorn-Orman was dead by 1935. Even before that it seems like things were going very roughly for her. I do not think she has much to do with the BUF. >Francis Hawkins <claimed he was gay. <claimed Jews claim Hitler fucked his niece and chewed on carpets too. A mere claim is nothing. >The ironguards are cringe since they were christCUCKS Better Christcucks than Communists and Jews, all of which the Iron Guard struggled against for decades, even after the war: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_anti-communist_resistance_movement Not to mention that they were actually one of the most potent direct-action fascist movements in Europe, assassinating prime ministers and other prominent politicians in service to the Jew. >10.Cultured thug is a kike for denouncing White nationalism Undeniable. He's a civnat cuck.
>>16460 >>16460 >Structural racism exists LMAO, Imagine being such a limp wristed cocksucking faggot. >That's why they need land and self-determination Maybe if you pulled that bbc that's rammed up your mutt ass and stopped drinking nigger cum you'll realize how retarded you sound. Kys sodomitefaggot.
(160.08 KB 691x510 muslims jews spain.jpg)
(123.40 KB 465x392 jews slavery islam.png)
>>16495 >Elijah Muhammad taught his followers not to even carry weapons. You're just lying now. NOI had (and has) a paramilitary wing - the Fruit of Islam. This group has assassinated and killed numerous innocent White people in its existence. It is nothing but an anti-White terrorist organization that is allowed to exist on American soil solely because it is composed of niggers. > And I'm not saying that I trust them more than White christians irt White interests, merely fighting against the jew Again, White Christians do more against the Jew than do these useful idiot niggers. John Earnest attempted arson on a mosque and carried out an attack on a synagogue. His manifesto was chock-full of Bible quotes against the Jews and he described himself as a devout Christian. Robert Bowers' Gab account had the caption "Jews are the children of Satan. (John 8:44,)" and added that "the lord Jesus Christ is come in the flesh." There have been numerous attacks carried out in the past by those connected with Christian Identity as well. I would trust all of these people more than racial aliens. >Muslims have a better grasp on the JQ in general, probably because they see jesus as just another prophet instead of worshipping him, a literal jew This is a Muslim lie too. The Muslims have long been close allies of the Jews, and pride themselves on this when doing apologetics against Christians. See pics. Not only this, Muslims see themselves as mandated by Allah to not harm Jews. Along with Christians, Jews are Ahlul Kitab. They can become dhimmi and are provided with legal protection by the Muslim state. This is extremely cucked. Also, one of the foremost scribes of Muhammad was Zayd ibn Thabit, who ʽAbdullah ibn Masʽud described as having two sidelocks (payot) and playing with Jewish boys while he was a child. They trust a sidelocked Jew for what the Qur'an says lmao.
Eljiah Muhammad was a stupid nigger monkey who never actual read the Qur'an or at-least created his own to kangz LARP. Wasn't that nigger boxer, Muhammad Ali also a fraud? Wouldn't be surprisng considering he was taught by a liar.
>>16511 >Christian Identity Christianity is still a Judaic religion and it's stupid logic like pic related says that is only reason why they hate Jews and it is to replace them with Whites.
>>16513 That's not really the point of what I said though, especially with Christian Identity and the soundness of any of its historical claims. The point is that I have more reason to trust other White people than some UFO cult black supremacists, which is literally what NOI is.
>>16513 >>16514 Actually the Christian Identity hermeneutic is the only way to read the Bible that makes sense, believe it or not.
(61.63 KB 600x600 1634151060817.jpg)
>>16511 The FOI did martial arts bro, not firearms training, and there's no proof any of those killings by black Muslim extremists were ordered by Elijah Muhammad himself, not even Malcolm's assassination And sure, christian identity fags hate jews but still want to force the old testament law on people, at least where I live (america). I don't trust them. Like I said, at least the black muslims want to seperate instead of ruling over us in the name of a jewish worldview The Qur'an says that the jews are the natural enemies of true religion, part of Hezbollah's slogan is "death to the jews" lol, there's even a hadith that says jews will hide behind rocks on the day of judgement and the rocks themselves will cry out "O muslims, there's a jew behind me, kill him!" Both religions are cucked to a certain extent since they still worship the Jewish god and follow the mosaic law but the black muslims in particular have an extra animus towards jews based on personal experience with slumlords, the NAACP etc. The Israel issue is also a huge factor, around 50% of arabs deny the holocaust And sure, muhammad was surrounded by jews, but christians worship one which is still worse imo >>16512 >Elijah Muhammad was a stupid nigger monkey Truly some high-level discourse >>16513 This. Christian identity is a bigger wewuz than the black hebrew israelites. I don't want to larp as da real jooz, I want to expunge all Jewish influence from White societies, including old testament morality >>16517 Although it is true that we can never trust nonWhites to look out for White interests, hating them enough to refuse even temporary tactical alliances is just bad tactics imo
>>16519 >rearms training, and there's no proof any of those killings by black Muslim extremists were ordered by Elijah Muhammad himself Elijah quite literally encouraged his retarded followers to attack Whites and destroy White America. He stated out his own mouth that "Whites are the devil". You are a nigger lover or a nigger yourself. There is no reason to praise this guy when their are niggers who are leagues better than him. Sucking BBCs to own the Jews is your goal?
>>16519 Christian Identity is a way to get White Nationalists to accept Abrahamism and Judaic culture/mindset, once that is accomplished, they begin with talking points like "Current Jews have degenerated a lot, but they are actually one of muh tribes as well" , which eventually turns into your typical pro-Israel neocon attitude. Modern Jews are seen as long lost brothers who have fallen from grace, where good Jews (TM) who listen to their rabbi or accept Yeshu as their savior get "saved" too. Judaic subversion uses several different vectors: - Culture, religion - Values, mindset, behavior - Lowest common denominator - Material dependency or greed These are interchangeable for the most part, meaning that if one gets a hold of your value system and society, the rest are likely to follow. Like any parasite, they seek vulnerable spots to inject their memetic poisons, that are supposed to eventually erode any defenses that a nation might have against jewry.
CHRIST IS DEAD AND HE'S NOT WORTH RESURRECTING
>>16523 No, anon. Christ only ever existed in the minds of the jew and the weak-minded idiots that they control.
>>16521 You don't know anything about Christian Identity. Even Wikipedia knows more about Christian Identity than you do. The 'Jews' in CI are literally the spawn of Satan. This is the serpent seed doctrine. Fake Jews are not 'brothers', they are Satanic spawn who are destined for damnation, just as are all non-White / non-Adamites.
>>16519 Who cares, NOI is an anti-White terrorist organization. They are directly or indirectly responsible for the deaths of dozens upon dozens of innocent White people. You are literally more concerned with defending anti-White niggers who believe that we are created by a mad scientist named Yakub. The absolute state of your priorities. You're also putting more effort into defending Muslims than actual White men who believe that they are chosen by God and that all other races ought to be exterminated and cannot even gain any sort of salvation because they are literal soulless beasts. I am starting to think that you are a nigger. You can't stop posting about niggers. It's ironic that you're also crying about 'muh Old Testament morality', because we all know you are the same faggot from the other thread that is obsessed with masturbating and won't acknowledge it as degenerate. I would bet a great deal of money that you are a porn-obsessed black nigger
>>16539 Oh god this schizo nigga again Listen faggot, I've already said multiple times that I haven't watched porn in years. I'm about to try nofap for awhile too, if only for the lolz. I'm a White amerimutt, but I have read a lot about black nationalism so I just figured I'd provide an alternative perspective. Some anons in this thread seem to be agreeing with me at least irt temporary alliances with blacks, and White christkikes not being trustworthy, which is really all I'm trying to argue anyway. This is the unpopular opinions thread, stop being such a baby. It amazes me how sensitive christfags get when you tell them their jew larp makes you uncomfortable, aside from having no historical basis. Go donate your paycheck to israel chaim
IP-hopping again
>>16541 >can't stop masturbating >obsessed with niggers Is there something you want to tell us?
>>16543 Not him but you're projecting at this point.
>>16544 "Projection" is a Jewish concept from Freud, who was inspired by Kabbalah, and from Talmudic commentaries. Not really helping your case here.
>>16541 >White Amerimutt Oxymoron, also thanks for explaining why you're such a faggot. >but I have read a lot about black nationalism so I just figured I'd provide an alternative perspective. Ah yes, acting like literal niggers is totally a eligble solution to the Jewish question. I am going to bet that you are also the evolutionist from the other threads as well. If I'm correct on my assumption, then imagine being a evolutionist, atheist, and cuckold nigger lover all at the same time. You should just leave this thread, because you're an embarrassment. >>16544 >(1) <T-toally n-not him What fail of a samefag, also pic related has nothing to do with us. This is a result of Jews. You're a fucking idiot.
>>16547 >What fail of a samefag Good catch, anon. I remember that he IP-hopped constantly in the other thread when defending masturbation. What a snake.
>>16544 >posts /leftypol/ screenshots >thinks that Marxist aren't cuckolds themselves. You are a nigger.
>>16544 None of these pics have to do with White nationalism, nor are niggers ever going to fight against the Jews, because they allow them to control their crybaby movements. They are literally interdependent on the state gibs and kikes. They have no real struggle with kikes, just with themselves and the pigs who have to risk their stupid lives just to get them to behave. 3rd pic are either kikes, feds, and/or coomers trannies doing one of their autistic roleplaying fetishes all over discuck. The anime profile pictures are a dead giveaway that they are fake and gay, just like how Arjuna a troon supposed White nationalist was inspired and taught by kikes. proving to all the weebs here that anime is trash. These fake White nationalist are as White and nationalistic as (((Richard Spencer))) and (((Mike Enoch))). You really got to wonder why Europeans hate Americans and it's because of retarded posts like theses. >>16547 >I am going to bet that you are also the evolutionist He may also be the guy who tried to argue that muh nigs have more testosterone and are more manly n shiet.
>>16535 You pretend like kikes don't run countless front organizations that have one official doctrine to draw members and then an entire program to judaize them once they take the bait. The entire lore that CI bases it's identity on would be a long forgotten sandnigger fairy tale if there were not the Jewish (as in, the kikes) authors of the bible who made it popular among Europeans. Even if contemporary Jews have somehow hijacked it, it doesn't make the supposed "true Jews" any better. An idea of "chosen people" is antithetical to Aryan values. Whites don't need a pact with some desert demon to justify their superiority, it's self-evident.
>>16552 >just like how Arjuna a troon supposed White nationalist was inspired and taught by kikes. Can you prove that he was a troon? >He may also be the guy who tried to argue that muh nigs have more testosterone and are more manly n shiet. Wasn't there a guy claiming to be married to a tranny, it's probably him too.
>>16553 The ancient Israelite authors of the Bible were White people, period. Both textual evidence and archeological evidence support this. >An idea of "chosen people" is antithetical to Aryan values Aryan values come from the Bible. Aryan values are Biblical values. God chose and forged a particular nation of White people to bring about Jesus Christ, and then Paul and the apostles preached this doctrine unto the Israelite tribes of Europe. All human beings (i.e. all White people) can attain salvation, no one else. >Whites don't need a pact with some desert demon to justify their superiority, it's self-evident. How arrogant of you to call your own Creator, who made you into a superior White man in the first place, a 'demon'.
>>16557 >Can you prove that he was a troon? I can't unfortunately, because a guy named Zoltanous, deleted his one of his livestream videos where he implied that he was a tranny, although I think he was apart of a group of sodomites and tranny radfems who LARPed as a fascists. Further proving my point that there are a-lot of fake people and groups claiming to be on our side. >Wasn't there a guy claiming to be married to a tranny, it's probably him too. I don't know who you're referring to, but it wouldn't be surprise, because queers love niggers which is why I say they're all anti-White. >16560 Funny bait, now kill yourself.
>>16539 >actual White men who believe that they are chosen by God and that all other races ought to be exterminated and cannot even gain any sort of salvation because they are literal soulless beasts <c-chosen? Whites are le evil as de jewz! No difference! Not referring to you but figuring what a newfaggot would've thought at that statement. I came to the greentexted conclusion only after a while and not immediately. Sadly, others don't get it. Look around and see, you'll know what I mean. Talks of "X people must die but Y people can be redeemable". Comparing which race of the Barbie doll sucked and which one is better. Childish, wishful thinking. Hitler made a big mistake and made non-Whites overstay their welcome. He was oblivious at the time. If he saw what was happening now, kikes would be a part of what he would be trying to crush. Not the whole. Here's another problem, there's the massive hordes of swarthy dirty shitskins. And then there's the ones who are in the know just like us. They are a much bigger threat (in my opinion). They have snuck into speech zones like here (even though no one in the mass media world knows what a 'chan' is) to lie and sweet-talk their way into our hearts. Why? >oh golly jee, I'm cool with these guys, I'm one of them now! They're scared. They know what happens when White men are done with all this mess. They want acceptance. They want relief that they're "okay". We must continuously reject their attempts of trying to impress us, for they can never be a part of us. They should live in fear for their short lives. We should never make the mistake Hitler made from now on, and forever.
>>16560 Whites were doing quite fine before they began getting "saved" . (((Saul))) was obviously a fellow White. >How arrogant of you to call your own Creator, who made you into a superior White man in the first place, a 'demon' No one "created" me, I chose this body for specific reasons. Your Jewish demon has no power over me.
>>16560 The only thing more disgusting than Whites pretending to believe christian garbage is Whites larping as 'israel'. You follow a religion designed by jews for manipulating the la creatura underclasses of Rome.
>>16573 >Whites were doing quite fine before they began getting "saved" Whites who reject Jesus Christ are siding with Satan and his Jewish spawn and will burn in hell. >((Saul))) was obviously a fellow White. Yes. Jesus came only for "the lost sheep of the House of Israel", whom Jesus said were the only reason for His coming. Paul preached to the same lost sheep of Israel, i.e. White people. Whites are the descendants of the ancient Israelites (not "the Jews") who moved into Europe and forgot their identity. Today they are mostly the White nations of Europe, America, Australia, etc. The Jews say that the 10 northern tribes were "lost", i.e. "the lost tribes of Israel", but it's clear that they migrated into Europe, and that they were and are White people. Where the Bible says "there is neither Jew nor Greek" (some versions say "neither Jew nor Gentile"), it's actually a retroactive mistranslation in that the words and meanings expressed no longer mean the same thing today -- A good translation today might read something like "Of the descendants of the man called Jacob/Israel, there is no distinction between those who maintained the knowledge of who they are/were and those who did not (i.e. migrated to Greece and began worshiping their gods, or migrated to Rome and began worshiping their gods). All of the children of Jacob/Israel are one people." Et. cetera. Only White people are human according to the Bible. >>16576 The ancient Israelites were White people. Look into what the Bible says, look at the murals that have been found in the region, etc. They were identical to the Greeks, who were blonds and redheads themselves. You are descended from the Israelite tribes who settled in Europe, as are all Europeans. >>16577 (Yahweh digits) WUZ ISRAELITES