/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

[Post a Reply]
[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply
Säge:
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.

05/01/22 /auspol/ and /ausneets/ have rebranded to /aus/

Spam has messed up the catalog, CTRL+F if you can't find a thread
[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(59.61 KB 1068x601 gigachad.jpg)
How to actually end the ZOG Blackshirt 05/01/2022 (Sun) 01:02:15 ID:6b35f3 No. 27790
As some of you seem to be under the delusion that the economic situation could cause ZOG to collapse, allow me to explain to you one simple fact: empires can endure mismanagement. What they cannot endure, however, is assasinations from hostile elements within their population or rampant domestic terrorism. This can cause an empire to collapse regardless of the economic situation, for an empire is merely an extension of its elite, the little people drones in a hivemind answering to the whims of said managerial class, obeying so long as their needs of comfort and security are met. These can be met, in a lot of cases, even in the worst of economic times, barring of course the Great Depression of the 1930s. The only true way to topple ZOG is to chop off the head of the snake or target its very organs in the same way Covid spike proteins wear down the organs of its host. If President Alzheimer and his half-caste nurse were all shot in the head tomorrow, that would actually bring the White man a lot closer to achieving his goals than say—boomers having to save money more gradually because of economic inflation—brought upon by the communist kikes trying to crash the government, bringing about commuinism in the same way they brought about democracy during the French Revolution. In fact, something as simple as killing cops and shitskins will also be a viable method of saving the White race, as White Enclaves, in the same way shitskins form no-go zones, could be formed through a climate of fear. If ZOG bots are too afraid of dying from lead poisoning and shitskins are too afraid of that one area because they are afraid of Cletus bashing his fuckin' brains in with a slugger, you will have your self a White enclave to rebuild Civilization from the wilderness, gradually reconquering it from the mexicans, niggers, and slants. My point is, Whites cannot wait for a deus ex machina to save them in the face of this horror; civilizations have only collapsed because White men made them collapse before they were ethnically replaced completely. Did Rome collapse simply because of Jewish mismanagement? No, it collapsed because Whites, running in fear from slants in the East, completely sacked it in order to secure land away from the huns that were raping them into extinction in Scandinavia, known as Germania at the time. Latins are extinct, replaced by Nordics in the North and Semitic half-castes who can sometimes pass for White in the South. Rome also collapsed because Emperors were assassinated left and right until the Huns looted the cities, and the Aryan conquerors came to reclaim the land. Being an American President should be the same as being an Emperor in Rome, a death sentence, if we want any hope of saving our race from extinction, same with being a cop or shitskin in a majority White area. In those Enclaves, only the strongest White men should be allowed to procreate, with as many as five women per strong White men, fulfilling their role as baby factories to be filled with the seed of strongest. That way, litters of ubermenschen can be formed from small sample sizes, allowing for the strongest—as nature intended—to overtake the weakest. Soyjaks should not be allowed to reproduce, for their weak, feminine nature will create weak, feminine sons who will, with their psuedo-maturnal instincts, let shitskins back into our new White nations. This cannot be. Only strong men should be allowed to reproduce, and the whole kiked idea of monogamy should be thrown away in favor of patriarchal polygamy, to ensure, as stated previously, the mightiest, most agressive Whites, propagate the gene pool. The only future in which I see Whites survive is one where there is a war without end, the strongest gradually moving through the continents, killing shitskins, and securing new land from the remains, clean and pure of non-Whites. Eternal war is eugenic for a population.
>>27790 >In those Enclaves, only the strongest White men should be allowed to procreate, with as many as five women per strong White men, fulfilling their role as baby factories to be filled with the seed of strongest. total support for this, this is also the origin of the evo-psych of the clan. a great man sets the foundation for a clan when he has many wives and maxes out their fertility. His sons will have brother-tier allegiance to their maternal brothers and half-brother allegiance to their half-brothers. A generation composed of as few as 5 unique paternal lines but comprising hundreds of people will embody the social trust borne of close genetic kinship at scale but without any degree of in-breeding having occurred. This stage is meant to be the origin of a new collective identity for the population and their descendants, as the need to develop an individual as opposed to interpersonal ego is less in this generation. Anyone with a good sense of how game theory and evopsych interact can confirm most of what I've said intuitively. eternal war hypothesis might be more of a cathartic fantasy than anything else though. Conflict will abound and subside in more measured cycles eventually.
>>27799 >eternal war hypothesis might be more of a cathartic fantasy than anything else No shit, he's talking about ethnoglobe. He was the same dude from the ethnoglobe thread but couldn't handle the fact that others just want non-Whites gone from White countries. So he made a brand new thread lol.
>>27807 >>27807 >couldn't handle the fact that others just want non-Whites gone from White countries He's right though, non Whites should be erased from the world. There won't be anyone left to moan about race if all the other races are minecrafted.
>>27790 How would Cletus bash a predator or a swarm of switchblade drones? >in the same way shitskins form no-go zones, could be formed through a climate of fear And you really believe that those governments couldn't take care of that problem if they really wanted to? If Whites tried that, they'd get Waco'd in days and kikes would make sure to also kill as many Whites who had nothing to do with that and label the rest as terrorists. To create a White enclave, or a White ethnostate, you need strategic leverage. And that takes much more than larping as the Legion from Fallout:NV. ZOG will ultimately defeat itself, because ZOG has no real purpose other than a bunch of primitive, psychopathic desert brigands playing out their bronze age fantasies and acting as the gatekeepers of this world. It doesn't matter what kind of deranged "mission" they delude themselves of having, since it has no basis in reality or the truth whatsoever. Let's not mention the dysgenic nature of this system, just look at how retarded all those (((young leaders))) are. The problem is that they will take everyone else down before they finally rot away, but there might be a small window of opportunity when they begin disintegrating. Their over-reliance on technology won't help them either. *An opportunity to consolidate a White ethnostate with all that's needed for it to defend itself. This is the only realistic goal as far as near future is concerned.
>>27790 >As some of you seem to be under the delusion that the economic situation could cause ZOG to collapse And a delusion it is: Those who *print* the fake money do not care about the fake money. It takes a tremendous amount of ignorance to think otherwise. >economic inflation—brought upon by the communist kikes trying to crash the government They are not 'trying to crash' anything. They can kill it in an instant and at will. What they are doing is managing the collapse so that it is gradual so that people don't wake up and fucking kill them. P.S. It's working. >In fact, something as simple as killing cops and shitskins will also be a viable method of saving the White race, as White Enclaves, in the same way shitskins form no-go zones, could be formed through a climate of fear. Maybe. But it would be considerably more effective to kill politicians, members of the mainstream media, the heads of big tech. big pharma, etc. Then, instead of killing people for 'muh White ethnoglobe', you're actually killing the primary enemy that stands in the way of an actual ethnoglobe. Oh, and take down every cell tower you can find along with every telco/cable company central office you see. If they can't spread their indoctrination and propaganda, shit will go south fast. Without their cell towers, internet and tv - they're flat-out *fucked*. >Did Rome collapse simply because of Jewish mismanagement? No, it collapsed because Whites... All do respect, neither you or I have any fucking idea why it collapsed - or if it even existed at all. Thank the fucking kikes for rewriting and subverting history. Hell, the entire planet - US included - was fucking FULL of Greco-Roman architecture until the late 1800's when there was a series of 'fires' that somehow destroyed thousands of buildings made of marble and granite but left the fucking trees standing. Look it up. As of this moment, we should *NOT* be killing shitskins or niggers. Why the actual fuck would you kill what could be a weapon in a fight against the real enemy? Ok second thought, go ahead and kill the niggers because they're truly more trouble than they're worth, but everyone else will take direction from a White guy that asserts dominance. Think about it: an ethnoglobe will be a natural by-product of the elimination of the kikes.
>>27790 >As some of you seem to be under the delusion that the economic situation could cause ZOG to collapse I was arguing about collapse in another thread. To clarify, I don't think ZOG will collapse, but our current way of life might. I don't rule out the possibility that ZOG would do an intentional demolition to try to force us into pod-living and bug-eating. This point got muddled, which led to alot of disagreement. >White enclaves Problem is, what's to stop ZOG from giving you the Waco treatment? They would either do a media blackout, or utilize a wave of propaganda on how they're fighting "nazi terrorism" or some nonsense. That's why I think we can't establish a White ethnostate out in the open, at least not until ZOG is out of the way.
(15.31 MB 648x360 Hotline NZ2.mp4)
>>27881 >And you really believe that those governments couldn't take care of that problem if they really wanted to? If Whites tried that, they'd get Waco'd in days and kikes would make sure to also kill as many Whites who had nothing to do with that and label the rest as terrorists. Not if there was a risk of said politicians in said government getting assassinated 24/7. Sure, they could Waco it, but if they are already getting assasinated by lone wolves by the time that is happening, survival will be their only concern, not stamping out small communities of White whose destruction would probably lead to even more dead politicians. What people do not understand is that politicians are not the brave demigods the media makes them out to be; rather, they are fat, old, hypogonadal faggots whose only concern is getting elected for the twentieth time. You see, there can not be another election if one of them goes the way of John Fitzgerald Kenneday, their prefrontal crotexes blasted out the back of their skulls, much to their family's horror. Hell, if you target their wives and children, they will back off in fear after the first few politicians find their wife and child dead, burned to death as a result of a car bombing. Brutality sends the state a message. That is one of the reasons why no-go zones are not dealt with, for they fear the potential terrorist backlash from Muslims. White terrorist backlash, which is infrequent but far worse in terms of damage per individual, needs to become the norm.
>>27885 Said Government's will run like scared bitches once their leaders start getting sniped, too afraid to even Waco anything for fear of it going further. The proverbial giant that is the ZOG will be too dazed after constantly getting struck in the jaw, the fist in question being the assassinations of their top frontmen. If President Alzeihmers and his half-caste nurse got the bullet on live TV, then it is the the end for the homosexual, interracial porno known as America. From that point, the kikes will have to go into total war mode to survive, establishing a military junta and murdering everyone who so much as even looked like a straight, White male—on live television—to further strengthen their anti-hate message. Optics do not matter. Strength really is the only optics that mattered, and if we could fight back against the Zog, voting from the rooftops instead of the Ballot, we could, quite easily, cause enough instability to cause a collapse in our favor, flipping their chess board over and shooting the cheating kike in the skull. By the time their leaders are dying from lead poisoning, we should be able to establish White Enclaves in the confusion, preferably in strategic regions with nuclear weapons. They will either run in fear or you'll have a kike, foaming at the mouth, beating his chest like an ape, and ordering hordes upon hordes of non-Whites upon our Enclave, which will be—with how desperate everything is—the last bastion of Western Civilization, held by superior tactics until they run out of the brains to build their fancy military equipment; thus, we shall be the only nation left with the labor skilled enough to build advanced weapons of war that actually work.
>>27888 this has alot of potential, but would require bold action.
>>27887 You underestimate the risks that some people would be willing to take in order to get some breadcrumbs of power and wealth. They could find plenty of those with nothing to lose as well. All puppets are replaceable and they are not the ones who decide on policies. Kennedy was offed by Mossad (with support of many structures within the US), that's hardly a good example. >That is one of the reasons why no-go zones are not dealt with, for they fear the potential terrorist backlash from Muslims They are allowing them to do so because they are a biological weapon against Whites. They took down Iraq (a country with an actual army), do you really think some neighborhood full of durkas would be a problem? And we have seen how easily NPC's are manipulated by the media, the population would be easily conditioned to support whatever action their governments might take. Sage for fedposting bait thread. You niggers should really change your script, it's awfully stale.
>>27907 >anyone talking about direct action is a fed Feds want Whites to stay docile and punish anyone who steps out of line, even the dumbass boomers on Jan 6th were acting too far out of the norm which is why they were punished for just walking about. They fear what would happen if that White mob was actually bloodthirsty and willing to burn down the capitol. They fear actual action. Action is what powers revolution, not just “spreading a message” and voting harder. You don’t need a majority to fight or even sympathize, and it’s impossible anyways with american demographics. Look at how small the Irish groups were the multiple times they struggled against the brits. Look at how small the number of taliban fighters were until they had enough strength to field armies openly. We need quality men willing to act, not a horde of cowards like the open-tent “conservatives”. There is no political solution anyways when the govt openly hates Whites and wants us dead. Fuck all of you assholes who accuse anyone who wants to act or at least discuss it as feds.
(20.98 KB 579x100 dr_pierce_quote.png)
>>27924 There is no cure for opticucks, at this point they are not better than vaxxoloid NPCs, they are so afraid of reality that they cannot let go of the fantasy of some guy like Trump or Musk (lmao) arriving to save the day. They are hopeless.
>>27924 >Fuck all of you assholes who accuse anyone who wants to act or at least discuss it as feds. i would like to ditto this because it is so crucial. fuck all assholes who accuse anyone who wants to act or at least discuss it as feds. it always reeks of newfag, too.
>>27883 >the entire planet - US included - was fucking FULL of Greco-Roman architecture until the late 1800's when there was a series of 'fires' that somehow destroyed thousands of buildings made of marble and granite but left the fucking trees standing Sell me on Tartaria. What I've seen hasn't been convincing
>>27930 What you've seen was pictures of the world fairs of the late 1880's - early 1900's's, I have looked at the evidence for this bullshit, and it is all built on the destruction of world fair sites, most of which were not made of marble or granite, but plaster, and other similar materials which do not withstand the test of time and fires occurred at many of them, many others were just demolished, because there was no point in continuing to waste space for overly lavish, yet cheaply built buildings used for one purpose.
>>27930 tartaria is bullshit. why must it always appear alongside world fairs and mudfloods? the topics are barely related. there are definitely many unanswered questions about the world fairs, and much of history is indeed obscured, but i haven't seen much solid evidence behind tartaria.
>>27935 No, what I've seen are photos of San Francisco, and Chicago both after a 'fire'. What I've seen are THOUSANDS of Greco-Roman buildings that are STILL IN EXISTENCE all over the fucking world. And if you *actually believe* that they rebuild San Francisco - 1850 new buildings in 2 years - you're sucking bong water. As for the Worlds Fairs - Seriously, if you believe the 'plaster' horseshit, you're either a moron or a shill. Who the actual FUCK would build several square miles of some of the largest structures known (to that date) out of *fucking plaster* kek. Meesa' Thinkin' yousa' deeboonked it wif fokkin' WikiPedia. >>27938 >tartaria is bullshit It might have been a real place, but it certainly wasn't a 'global civilization', I agree with you there. There are MANY unanswered questions about the 'worlds fairs', as well as tens of thousands of these buildings that were destroyed in the late 1800's early 1900's. Did you know that there were hundreds of thousands of electric cars in the early 1900's? All over the world. And they had ranges in the hundreds of miles. Dig. You'll find the info.
>>27930 I'm not 'selling' you on anything kike. Go fucking kill yourself.
>>27943 >Who the actual FUCK would build several square miles of some of the largest structures known (to that date) out of *fucking plaster* kek Driven White men trying to flex their artistry and industry to the world, knowing they only have a limited amount of time and a temporary venue to prove it >Did you know that there were hundreds of thousands of electric cars in the early 1900's? All over the world. And they had ranges in the hundreds of miles From what I understand, the ranges were more like 70 miles. Once they got rid of the hand crank and added mufflers, ICE cars became more popular. It wouldn't surprise me if there wasn't some suppression involved to push society that way, but I don't think we had electric cars with approximately the same range as modern cars in 1917. In general, a lot of tech has been around longer than the public would suspect, but it takes a while for it to disseminate. Another example is that we had UAVs in WW2.
>>27907 >Kennedy was offed by Mossad (with support of many structures within the US), that's hardly a good example. he was offed by a communist who got caught almost by accident that this oswald scumbag got support from other commie jews and perhaps the mossad to some extent is more than certain
>>27943 the real destruction is wrought by modern architects, starting in the late 60s, destroying all neoclassic neogothic artdeco buildings
>>27924 And the only alternative to being docile is doing something stupid that would make things even worse, right? You've been agitating for directionless violence for what, 3 years now, and you are still posting here, that should tell us enough. Even if you are not a fed, you are basically trying to incite others to do something that you are not doing yourself. No strategic leverage = defeat. You need clearly defined, realistic goals and the right strategy to achieve them (that can vary a lot depending on the circumstances), not to chimp out like a nigger.
>>27883 >Hell, the entire planet - US included - was fucking FULL of Greco-Roman architecture until the late 1800's when there was a series of 'fires' that somehow destroyed thousands of buildings made of marble and granite but left the fucking trees standing. Look it up. How would one look this up? Not the other tartaria stuff, but this specific claim about fires destroying marble buildings. (I get you mean it as cover, but I want to source the original claims the compose this cover)
>>27943 Seriously you think that given the choice a builder wouldn't have gone woth the cheaper much more cost and time effective option and would have wasted his time fucking around with giant slabs of marble?, which to build anything of any great size with it, takes fucking years, even with the aid of modern technology, it would have taken decades to do so in the 1800's, you are a moron of the highest degree.
>>27965 Yeah, advocates for unfocused attacks against random civilian targets obviously glow. But well, we all know the decision making apparatus are so far above our heads that we cannot reach them. This frustrates people, because they know that the only people in reach of them (local politicians, religious leaders, sign-waving useful idiots) are utterly replaceable. It almost doesn't matter if you assassinate your leftie mayor and mutilate his body as a warning to the rest; there will always be some venal cunt waiting to fill their shoes for an NGO checque. The only way to calm these people down is to provide them with a sense of community and belonging among their own kind. We need to build our communities and power bases before we can attack the forces arrayed against us meaningfully anyway.
>>28204 No, we don't, we can't build the kind of community necessary to wage this war until ZOG is already weakened beyond the point that it can enforce its myriad community destroying rules, Attacking critical infrastructure is the only path currently open to us, until you are willing to do that, this will continue just as it always has, a slow fall into oblivion.
>>28204 >Yeah, advocates for unfocused attacks against random civilian targets obviously glow. And they can never answer the question why are they always agitating for someone else to do it >We need to build our communities and power bases A non-violent movement with realistic goals that are understandable to most people other than the most braindead ghouls of ZOG would be a way to go, provided it's decentralized enough to avoid any (((leaders))) from being forced into prominence. Of course, you will find zero answers to those when proposed. It would be much more difficult today, but looking at the history of groups like Mormons shows us that it's possible, at least in theory. We would just need to avoid their mistakes. A "settler" type of movement, the only issue is that all land on this planet seems to be occupied by ZOG, but there must be a solution to that (artificial islands or something).
>>28196 Here's a good introduction to the mass fires and destruction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js8y-04VkYg
>>27965 >>28204 >>28213 16/pol/ has a thread, >>>/pol/48258 discussing the fact that there is no political solution with hundreds of replies. Of course, none of you will acknowledge any merit to it, only strawmanning talk about Direct Action as merely "directionless violence". The only solution you all offer is to run and hide. >>We need to build our communities and power bases >A non-violent movement with realistic goals It's been talked about for many decades. Conservatives haven't managed to accomplish anything since they existed. George Lincoln Rockwell attempted the political route and got assassinated. Fringe right groups routinely get co-opted. Isolated communities can get Waco'd. What defense do you have against the government deciding to bus hundreds of niggers into your little White town? If non-violent, none. Where the fuck do you think you will be able to settle without eventually attracting government attention? Any mass of Whites will be a red flag for them. All you are advocating is White Flight. There's very little places to run and growing far fewer. Keep running and don't consider any other option. Anything else would _glow_.
>>27790 I hate to dash out blackpills, but ZOG cannot easily be uprooted and later supplanted with a White ethnostate. Not that the politics and ideals for what to replace ZOG with aren't worthy of discussion or don't have merit. Politics is a very worthy subject matter. Anons who contemplate the overthrow of ZOG are no better than squabbling anarchists wanting to abolish the State. Comfort and security are valid reasons for most White people to submit to civil authorities, like it or not. ZOG would probably still thrive and survive even if radical action were undertaken -- what you can learn is that those who provide comfort and security have a great vantage point of political power, but that really cannot easily be supplanted. Civil authority is strong, and it isn't the resistance that usually brings down civil authority as an external force, no matter how much people cope by having 'decentralized movements' or 'fighting ZOGbots'. As long as civil authority functions by design and brings comfort and security and continues to be a provider, the vast majority of White people will continue to be obedient and there's nothing much to say about it -- it's easy to talk about civil disobedience, but it's usually more bark than bite. What really undermines the State is its own pitfalls rather than resistance. -- And when it comes to resistance, it would be the State's own internal fluctuations and internal disputes that open the gate for revolutionary activity to succeed. So what I would tell political activists and wannabe rebels is that their own force against the State is weak -- the State by its natural course is intended to be this way for everyone's benefit. I'm not saying civil disobedience cannot up the pressure and melting point, where ZOG would start to collapse in on its self -- but I personally think its really the internal weakness that provides that opportunity for rebellion to be successful. I think organization is much more potent than emphasis on a kind of 'decentralized resistance'. That's like trying to bring life to movement without vital organs. Sure, it has weaknesses, as are vital organs, but they're still necessary.
>>28241 Also, while hivemind quote-on-quote "decentralization" is ideal for spreading the views like some imagine with /pol/, it's not enough to severe their civil obedience as long as they believe they are sustained by and are being sustained. For political action, you do need political organization and leadership. For success, you ideally want to be the providers and amass social power and wealth. Look at cartels. They have structure and organization and because they are providers with wealth from their illicit dealings, they have tremendous political influence. Not only because they are illegal organizations, but because they have the influence by providing for people and wealth to influence. Really, the ZOG is no different in being a provider as social power, through banking and lobbying, becoming a source for these politicians to depend upon.
>>28284 The IRA is a fascinating case study when it comes to political organization. They had some cell-like elements because of infiltration and informants, but even then there was a huge network of community members, ex-pats, and foreign countries like Libya providing material and physical support. I don't think they would have been nearly as successful without this framework
>>28295 I don't think they would be successful at all if Ireland wasn't a backwater shithole that nobody cares about.
>>28295 Niggers allying with White cause is temporary. They'll be discarded in the long run.
>>28296 Well yes, the fact that the UK couldn't risk glassing their own loyal citizens played to the IRA's advantage. >>28302 The point is that pretty much any modern revolutionary movement requires foreign support to be successful, which requires some degree of centralization
>>28303 >pretty much any modern revolutionary movement requires foreign support to be successful, I disagree on the claim and upon its implications. Firstly, the claim that a pro-White movement would need foreign support in order to succeed. I will admit, foreign support is extremely helpful for any insurgency. Foreign backers can provide a safe heaven for insurgents to train, recruit, and make propaganda. They can also provide arms and money to support the insurgency. However, are these things impossible to attain without foreign support? Not at all. Americans already possess all the physical tools they need to overthrow the regime. They certainly possess the tools to wage decades of intense insurgency without the need of a foreign backer. Safe heaven is another matter. It's true that the lack of such a safe heaven would be a blow. But let's not imagine that one would be totally safe in, say, China or Russia. The CIA is not the best organization for assassination, but they can and have had dissidents killed in almost every country on earth. Secondly, the implication is that White insurgency is impossible because no one would back us. This is not true. Just because every country acknowledges the supremacy of jewish interests doesn't mean that they like it. No one likes jews. A silly example people like to make is China. Xi Jingping has gone to Israel and works hand in hand with jews. But that is not because he likes jews. He is Chinese and the Chinese are as ethnocentric and racist as the jews are. The reason why almost every single country on earth pays homage to jews is because not doing so will bring destruction and death to whoever is brave enough to resist them. And the reason why jews wield so much power is their iron grip over American foreign policy. A White insurgency would severely weaken America's ability to be the world police. This would allow China more options to accomplish their geopolitical aspirations. Why hasn't China funded a White insurgency yet? Because there isn't one and you cannot force a resistance movement to be viable if it lacks the support and willpower to do so on its own first. To give money to an unviable resistance movement is to commit suicide as a state. It would be a waste of money and the retaliation from the USA would be disproportionate and brutal. China is not the only geopolitical enemy of the US out there. Iran, Russia, and to a lesser extent India all have geopolitical interests which America is blocking. Politics makes strange bedfellows and I fully expect that some day American White nationalists will employ Chinese AA missiles. Or, if the Chinese missiles don't work (very real possibility considering Chinese manufacturing), at least be given money to buy them on the black market.
>>28309 >I disagree on the claim I cannot name one revolutionary movement that didn't take advantage of foreign support. Maybe that's because there's always another nation with an axe to grind, but unless there's some other existential threat to the state, I suspect the sheer material advantage will ultimately be insurmountable ninety nine times out of one hundred. And in domestic insurrection, rebels don't have the luxury to simply outlast. I agree with your points in the second paragraph, excepting the existence of the implication in the first place. Unrelated, but the word you are looking for in your first paragraph is haven, not "heaven".
>>28302 There is no allying with blacks. The arrangement they have with ZOG is too good for them to give up. All posturing you see from them otherwise is just haggling over the split.
>>28323 >I cannot name one revolutionary movement that didn't take advantage of foreign support As you said, foreign support is easy to come by. If any country is hostile to Country A in any way and Country A has viable rebels, Country B is extremely likely to support them. The primary stumbling block is meeting the qualifier "viable," and even then, some countries are willing to throw money down the toilet just to fuck with a rival. >I suspect the sheer material advantage will ultimately be insurmountable ninety nine times out of one hundred. Firstly, the primary goal of any insurgent organization is to survive the next day. Please read this https://exiledonline.com/wn-38-ira-vs-al-qaeda-i-was-wrong/ By merely existing, they exert disproportionate power over the state. The war is still asymmetric and the state will possess more resources than them, but the mere existence of a dozen rebels willing to strike from time to time grants them disproportionate influence over the state's actions. Secondly, once the primary goal of an insurgent organization is met, the secondary goal is to strike at either the members of the ruling regime or the regime's economic base. By doing so, one whittles away the asymmetry so that an insurgency can grow into a civil war. This is made much easier because the infrastructure of even a major insurgent organization can be as small as a few bank accounts. Maybe not even this. Meanwhile, the infrastructure of the state is scaled exponentially with the rebel organization. A state is a target rich environment in every way. Thankyou for the spelling correction.
>>28429 >Firstly, the primary goal of any insurgent organization is to survive the next day. A good article, and I agree with this, but I still maintain that domestic insurrections have a much harder time outlasting. I don't think I emphasized this point enough originally, so I'll expound here. When the guerilla force is operating against a foreign power, the foreign power will be less invested, because they always have the option to retreat. If the guerilla force is persistent and annoying enough over a long enough period, the foreign power can suffer the temporary hit to international reputation and pull out. In the case of a domestic insurrection, the state will be significantly less likely to come to terms, as its own power will be directly affected: its tax base is diminished, insurrection of other regions become more likely, and international threats suddenly have a potential launching point on their doorstep. Because of this, the state will dedicate many more resources and force, because the cost of losing is potentially catastrophic. So, the state will be much less likely to enter a war of attrition in this scenario, because that will play to the guerilla's strengths, and the state knows it. I also maintain that the domestic state will have other relative advantages compared to a foreign one, such as proportionately more support with the populace, as they won't be viewed as invaders, and better intel on potential rebels. The IRA straddles the line between a domestic and foreign guerilla group, and used this to their advantage. NI is viewed by England as a bit of a backwater and a distinct population and location, so the British government didn't feel obliged to dedicate all the resources available to stamping out the IRA. If an English guerilla group started operating out of the West Midlands, the British government would seek immediate and decisive retribution, which was never the case in Ireland. I suppose my ultimate thesis is that domestic insurgents are at a greater disadvantage operating against their own government, and thus would need to exploit every possible advantage possible to succeed, including foreign support.
>>28447 >Because of this, the state will dedicate many more resources and force All of this is true, but no one said that it would be easy. It is the job of the insurgent to overcome these barriers. Do or die. As I said, foreign support is ideal and probably inevitable. But it's not required for an insurgency to exist. What is required is a significant degree of public (White) support for the cause.
>>28809 >foreign support is ideal and probably inevitable. But it's not required for an insurgency to exist Much in the same way as it's not a requirement for a professional basketball player to be taller than 6 ft./183 cm.
(1.71 MB 960x740 koevoet practicing.png)
>>28204 This is wrong. The only way to win is to continuously k*ll the people responsible for enslaving White people in this new police state of the USSA. No one said anything about mutilating a dead person's body, that is atrocious jungle-tier behaviour and would only drive people away (and anyone on our side should be penalised heavily for that because it shows anti-social behaviour devoid of any morally-necessary issuance for violence). Furthermore, operations need to be conducted so that our racial enemies DO NOT know who did it, OR the evidence points to someone else, such as an enemy of ours (leftists/communists/j*ws). The latter of those two choices would be even more difficult to do, so it wouldn't be worth our time. While doing this, propaganda should be spread EVERYWHERE including garbage heaps such as South LA and Crenshaw (operational strength and capacity permitting). tl;dr: get in, get out, act surprised like everyone else and do not talk about it and certainly NOT with the piggers. GOT IT?
>>28302 The ghetto-dwellers are too cowardly to face armed and livid White people head-on, which is why they gang up on lone Whites or families and murder innocent children like what happened with Cannon Hinnant. Once Whites begin to actually resist with arms, then the cowardly minorities will run and hide. Mexican gangs in USSA are a little different, because they hate blacks more than anything and many have a weird fetish for lighter features.
>>28956 If we are all 5'6'' and we will die if we don't win basketball, then I guess we better get very good at jumping.
>>29046 >Mexican gangs in USSA are a little different, because they hate blacks more than anything and many have a weird fetish for lighter features. And? What's the verdict on them?
(1.60 MB 1600x1200 koevoet - sean crozier.png)
>>29055 I imagine that minorities (except faggots who must be disposed of when they are found out to be so) will quiet themselves down and likely, Whites will see a minstrel show so as to not bring upon themselves what the hymies have. My point was that Whites who actually fight for themselves are some of the baddest sons of bitches in the world, and that if we ever find a way to curtail ZOG through v*olence, then the ethnic minorities will be too scared to anger us. I imagine though, that the castizo/mestizo horde more loyal to Mexico and south of there will haul their caramel-coloured asses south of the border. This assumes that Whites will do anything about it, which seems unlikely. Remember, the trumptards who rightly believed that the election was stolen, didn't do anything constructive and instead of killing members of ZOG, stormed the capital which provided propaganda for our enemies (and gave us even more evidence that the police are not our friends). I'm free-wheeling this post, but I have one last thought. I was thinking of compiling a kill list which would detail every politician worth of d**th, but then I thought, that would essentially be all of them, even the new ones, since they would undoubtedly be prone to corruption and being the lapdogs for ZOG anyway. There is only one solution available for these animals, and that is to put them d*wn.
>>29057 >will quiet themselves down and likely, Whites will see a minstrel show so as to not bring upon themselves what the hymies have I'm not sure whether the non-nigger nonWhite races will be more peaceful than niggers, but sure.
>>29079 once again, I have failed. I meant that once the destruction is beholden to the naggers, then they would move mountains to put on a harmless minstrel show rather than gain the ire of Whites. dunno why i said minstrel show, as that was a jewish creation and continuing project. whatever
>>29057 >Remember, the trumptards who rightly believed that the election was stolen, didn't do anything constructive and instead of killing members of ZOG, stormed the capital which provided propaganda for our enemies (and gave us even more evidence that the police are not our friends). Even if the election was stolen, maybe it was maybe it wasn't, the kind of person who would be really amped up for Trump by that point would be a system enjoyer anyway. Very little raw material to work with in the US.
>>29083 >Minstrel show No, get rid of them too. Not one race's getting excluded.
>>29094 >the kind of person who would be really amped up for Trump by that point would be a system enjoyer anyway. Very little raw material to work with in the US. Exactly my point. It's not impossible, but we have to find and be around people who are not going to fall for the "voting solves everything" nonsense. Those same idiots would sell you down the river to the police if they get wind of any sort of *"t3rr0r1$t"* inclinations (back the blue, right fellow goyim?) and leave you to rot in a cell. >>29095 fair enough i suppose, my point was just that the minorities would be too afraid to retaliate or plot any sort of violence against Whites if they ever happen to see what Whites are capable of.

Delete
Report