/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

[Post a Reply]
[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply
Säge:
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.

08/28/20 Come and join our Matrix/IRC servers, the info can be found here.
[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(40.84 KB 1200x800 National_Bolshevik_Party.svg.png)
National bolshevism thread Blackshirt 04/22/2021 (Thu) 16:28:54 ID:0a3033 No. 3362
Do you think national bolshevism is much potential alongside other 3rd positionist movenents.Why is the national bolshevism isnt as legit movement nowdays somelike many leftists are obsessesd with infighting alongside themselfs seeing it as a violent Threat to leftism.
National Bolshevism is a complete meme, and an oxymoron. It is subversive and anti-Nature in itself with its principles of class warfare as well. I do not know who would purposely choose to label themselves with the name used by a gang of jewish gangsters who massacred and enslaved the people of the Russian Empire. Communism in itself is unworkable at large scales, and is synonymous with technocracy, which, as we see today, obviously works so smoothly and well with the medical dictatorships instituted since the beginning of Covid. The tragedy of the commons prevents any sort of public ownership working on a mass scale. NazBols are leftists who think they should be accepted because they pay lip-service to the nation.
Nazbols is a meme and something that cannot and should not exist. It's just an idealology created by a bunch of edge-lords leftists who accept some social conservative policies. It's no less of a daddy issue idealology than Marxism.
>National Bolshevism Sorry but we don't accept LGBT or any jewish threads being made on here.
We don't need this kike degeneracy. Kys, natbol faggot.
Sure. It's basically Stalinism with more emphasis on national identity.
Thuletide has the best compilation I've seen on why NazBols / Duginists are subversive literal faggots, I'm not sure what is left to discuss other than continuing to point out which controlled opposition they're connected to and wondering which side will hang them first.
(1018.02 KB 1000x1000 duginists.png)
>>3393 Thuletide's article on Nazbols and Duginists was great, you just reminded me about that. Anyone who for whatever reason isn't aware of the nature of these people, as well of the nature of people like Keith Woods and the like, absolutely has to read this article: https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/05/18/alt-right-duginism/
>>3395 Sometimes I wish we had a comprehensive website that went through all of the controlled opposition like this, and a sticky at the top of every /pol/ or third position board pointing at it, as it would seem that a lot of the youth just fall for it over and over again. Just yesterday I saw that some "Australian" (with an American accent) NS leader was found to have a gook wife in the midst of his doxing members over nothing and advocating that anyone taking action is reported to the police, and here we still have people thinking Trump was on our side for a single nanosecond of his orange kike life. It's like Charlottesville never happened.
>>3399 >Sometimes I wish we had a comprehensive website that went through all of the controlled opposition like this They don't make their articles this detailed but Renegade Tribune does a pretty good job at exposing controlled opposition.
>>3389 Which doesn't work and is retarded. Stalin is a kike and a faggot.
>>3389 >It's basically Stalinism with more emphasis on national identity. It's just another "ism" meme that doesn't make any sense. >>3399 > and here we still have people thinking Trump was on our side for a single nanosecond of his orange kike life. I don't know what you're talking about, because no one here has thought that Trump was on our side.
>>3389 Stalin and his views are diametrically opposed with those of National Socialism, and even beyond this, they are not healthy for our people. And to zoom even further out, it is not Fascist. The real litmus test here to see how 'revolutionary' Nazbol is is to go out with a hammer and sickle and wave it around. Some people will like it, some boomers will sperg out and most people won't give a shit. If you did the same with a Swastika you'd probably be beaten bloody within a half an hour depending on the area and the cops would be called to remove you.
>>3414 Don't care if it isn't actually fascism, Saddam and Iraq wasn't either. Communists consider Stalinists traitors to the revolution for good reason and it's because they had to completely change communism from it's theoretical manifestation to make it workable with reality and the result was Russian imperial ambition. >>3402 Achshually he killed kikes and faggots
>>3395 What is your obsession with Keith m8? You brought this autism from cafe and he's not even a duganist.
>>3422 >Saddam and Iraq wasn't either. Your point? There's little to celebrate about Iraq and Saddam except to say that it was better under him than after he was deposed. Stalin was no friend of Whites. Despite all of your talk about 'muh socialism in one nation', Stalin's USSR was still quite active in funding anti-fascism activities throughout Europe and attempting to subvert free European countries. We all know how much Stalin contributed tons of aid to the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War. The USSR used (civic) nationalist sentiments to rally people around the regime when it was literally in shambles. The USSR was a massive multikulti empire. >>3423 Keith is a crypto-Marxist.
>>3424 Stalin supports people with his ideology? You don't say!? My point is that in order for communism to work he had to heavily modify it with national characteristics that the theory of Marx didn't account for. Doesn't mean he's a fascist sympathizer or even a third positionist, it just means he shares characteristics of it much in the same way that China does today with it's "socialism with Chinese characteristcs". Also Russia itself was multikulti and unless you kill every single central asian native to Siberia it's always going to be that way.. Explain how he's wrong with that assessment. You might actually have autism if you can't see the implication the comment below is making in regards to your interactions with other races, especially as far as /pol/ as a community goes. It does come off as sociopathic in the vein of loving your own people because you make it an all or nothing dichotmy where you aren't willing to help others if you're in a position to do it to no detriment to your own people. It isn't necessary for nationalism.
>>3428 >It does come off as sociopathic in the vein of loving your own people because you make it an all or nothing dichotmy where you aren't willing to help others if you're in a position to do it to no detriment to your own people. So basically you're saying that if White people were well off then the White races should be helping the non-White races? Wow you got balls saying that around here.
>>3430 I'm not saying we should be doing anything for anyone. Our own people take priority in a situation like this but if we're well off I don't see a problem with giving excess food to third world countries in the middle of a drought or international relief efforts. The problem with these things now is that it's being used against us. The african population is breeding far above their capacity to feed themselves on their own because the modern west is giving them obscene amounts of support all for the sake of importing their excess population to our shores for cheap labor and dividing us to keep from becoming nazi again. Support should only come in a crisis and we should never let them through our borders. tbh my concern is mostly for the endangered wildlife the niggers would have to eat to keep from starving which is why I wouldn't have too much of a problem with relief.
>>3428 Nationalism / ultimately prioritizing one’s group isn’t sociopathic though, it’s retarded to even say that. Nationalism relies on the exact opposite of sociopathy, but rather on altruism and cooperation among a group of closely-related people. This typically involves multiple tens of millions of people working more or less together. Is putting this group ultimately first, especially when one only has a choice between one’s own and another sociopathy? Of course not, it’s a Law of Nature to side with one’s own and to seek their survival before all else. >you make it an all or nothing dichotmy where you aren't willing to help others if you're in a position to do it to no detriment to your own people. You’re not wrong but ultimately it comes down to only one’s own group mattering, regardless of what one does or says. This is even true with those say “a place for every race”. Ultimately they would throw other nations under the bus and destroy them if they had reason to, not carrying about that race’s “place”. Why? Because ultimately—if one is not totally cucked and brainwashed—they will realize that they are their group matter the most from their subjective point of view. Other groups operate the same. >>3432 >I don't see a problem with giving excess food to third world countries in the middle of a drought or international relief efforts Same problem with giving nigger’s welfare. It’s dysgenic and is keeping afloat people who ought to die off if they get themselves in such situations in the first place. Droughts and famines are Nature’s way of thinning out overpopulated areas and the weak. There are already too many people in third world countries, as you say. I’m not really one of those who constantly seethe about the mere existence about non-Whites but I truly couldn’t care less if they die off in large numbers in a crisis someplace. Ultimately better for the Earth
>>3433 Right, but Keith isn't saying prioritizing your group is sociopathic, he's an Irish nationalist himself. This autist likes to take things out of context and obfuscate the meaning behind the words and you can see it plainly with the fucking filename itself. Keith is talking about the /pol/ types you find in nationalist circles that do think it's an all or nothing dichtomy where you can only care about your group and not have any empathy or altruism to other groups because of that. That's where the sociopathic tendency lies and it's used constantly to attack us and prevent even our own race from joining with us because it comes across as us being broken toys of society rather than people that want what's best for our race. A place for every race sounds nice but reality is much different than that. Anatolia would be Greek land or atleast they would have a strong claim to it, but they just don't. Luckily for most Whites we don't need to expand into areas inhabited by other races, we already did it long ago with America, Australia, and etc. The only question now is resources of which we can just trade for. Like I said, we shouldn't have to do anything for any other race, infact if we were to (rightfully) stop giving welfare to africa millions would die, but it would bring their population down to a level that only they would be able to sustain with their own technological development which would be needless to say, low in comparison to asia. If such a thing like that were to happen I wouldn't have a problem with the leftover populations getting aid from a crisis, but definitely not this overly inflated population number they have that's only being kept afloat due to the west's pathological altruism.
(1.12 MB 1173x1136 duh.png)
>>3423 >What is your obsession with Keith m8? You brought this autism from cafe and he's not even a duganist. He identifies as and promotes NazBol, is connected to Dicky and has the same thousand cock stare, I'm not sure the pictured quote above was the best example of this. May I ask what makes him worth defending to you?
(30.37 KB 960x488 1517828339776.jpg)
>>3432 > if we're well off I don't see a problem with giving excess food to third world countries in the middle of a drought or international relief efforts AYY LMAO
>>3441 There's the expected reply! There's this unspoken rule of /pol/ boards >the probability of a fuck you reply to a shitskin-sympathy post increases to 1 over the time. A guy posts how shitskins are okay and aren't too bad. The fuck you reply to that will be posted in a day, a week or even a month (bumping the thread unexpectedly). But, the "fuck you" reply STILL gets posted. Fascinating isn't it?
>>3457 It's exactly this kind of cancer that has driven our best posters like synarchist anon from the board.
>>3461 I said basically the same thing a few hours ago in the unpopular opinions thread. Retards this type are the single biggest type of cancer on /fascist/ and are actually part of the reason why /fascist/ was originally created to get away from low-quality /pol/tards like >>3457. And before some spergs attack me, I don't think that giving aid to Africa is a good idea either, but it is highly irritating to see good quality posters driven away and replaced with low IQ tards who would be better off on /pol/
>>3462 This is the the "curse" of imageboards though, every pleb has the right to voice his opinion, it only really works if you are small enough or if there is something to keep them away, sooner or later plebs will flood every last corner and turn it into a nivellated swamp, a possible answer is heavy moderation but that's just another cursed blade. I don't know a good solution either, maybe custom capchatas like on zzz to at least filter out the worst cases would be a step in the right direction.
>>3466 I think an autobot for nigger-tier typing like /a/ has is effective at filtering retards. Provided it can be implemented without weighing down the site too much like Hoihoi did on 8chan.
>>3467 Something like Hoihoi would be nice. Anything open for plebs to reign free always degenerates. The problem with Hoihoi is that it was just too strict. I remember that you could forget to end your sentence with a period and it would ban you and delete your post. That's a bit excessive, but filtering out nigger babble and certain conventions is always a good idea.
(2.28 MB 1680x2975 The fascist BO betrayal.png)
>>3461 >>3462 There's nothing "high IQ" about subsidizing the breeding of future enemies, or engaging in liberal moralism.You'd think that self proclaimed "pro Whites" would want to avoid making the very same mistakes that our predecessors made, mistakes that lead to this mess in the first place. But I guess being perceived "as le high IQ intellectual" by sperging about your "super special, obscure brand of fascism" or your bizarre mix of communism, with fascist aesthetic, is just more important than securing an existence for our people, huh? I was there on 8chan when fascist was first founded, and yes, it was made for higher quality discussion about fascist ideology, while /pol/ was more for more general discussions. Yet, always the populations of /fascist/, and /pol/ came from the same general worldview, and were part of the same struggle, not even mentioning that most of us were cross-posters. It was only the retarded strasserist board owner who tried to turn it into some anti /pol/ board, "he was also the creator of "le based nonWhite anime girl" intergalist chan", and he eventually closed the board down "with another anon reopening it later" then went onto /leftypol/ and announced that he was a full blown commie, and fuck fascism, because he decided that Strasser didn't care enough about "muh class" and fascism was "ebil" because "muh waycism, muh holocaust, muh imperialism". like every other commie on that board. Presumably most of you fags will join him in eventually deciding that going communist will be the right way to go, since you get to larp, and pretend that your le super special "intellectual" that's just so much smarter than "those dumb, evil, hateful /pol/ peasants" because you know what "historical materialism' truly means, and you understand that not every nigger is a bad person, while not compromising your bourgeois, liberal, morality, in the process. Pseudo-intellectual, idiots, who only care about their own egos love that kind of shit. Also I was the one who took this screenshot, looking back the Kosher thug comment was cringe, but at the time I was still a big fan, and his video's on NS Germany, such as the "Nazi economy" showing how they solved the class problem, are still good
>>3470 >I remember that you could forget to end your sentence with a period and it would ban you and delete your post That was actually a meme. Hoihoi doesn't know when your sentences end with punctuation or not. It just checks if your post contains a specific list of words or acronyms. The meme was just to discourage plebs from even trying to post, at least if memory serves. That, or it was pushed by /animu/ to get people away from /a/. I don't remember certainly. But I agree that it shouldn't be too hardcore - walling out acronyms and flavor of the month meme phrases like "hot take" would be sufficient.
>>3473 You don't have to advocate for foreign aid (I don't, I think it's antithetical to fascism and furthermore it's unintelligent) to see that >>3441 is low-effort nonsense.
>>3475 Meh, some amount of shit posting is alright. Especially when it's making fun of retarded bullshit like what that anon was posting. Don't be a pretentious faggot.,
>>3362 Fuck off tranny cancer cell, there will NEVER be any compromise.
>>3473 I hope you know we have the same BO today as the "Strasserist BO" who created the board
Edited last time by FashBO on 04/23/2021 (Fri) 18:53:44.
>>3478 So you're the guy who reopened the board after the strasserist chimp out? Cool, thanks for keeping it alive after all these years.
>>3479 No, I am the Strasserist who created the board in March / April 2018 until July 2018 when I lost control of the board and was then given the board back in April 2019 by the guy who reopened it when he left.
>>3480 Was that guy on /leftypol/ larping?
>>3482 Nah I don't know who that is, it's a larp. That along with the idea that I was some sort of Brazilian mutt was another thing that was stuck on me after the board was wrecked kek. After /fascist/ went down everyone went to an alternate board that someone set up called /3rdpol/ if I'm remembering correctly. I tried to come in and make a board with almost the exact same name, until I realized I was being retarded and was basically splitting the board, especially after I had not shown up immediately after the problems. So I realized I was being an ass and quietly closed the board and mainly lurked and quietly posted on /fascist/ in the months that followed. And when the BO who had taken over in the meantime decided they wanted to leave and leave the board to someone else, I stepped up and volunteered and he gave the board to me since he wanted to maintain a similar style of moderation that the board had had.
Edited last time by FashBO on 04/23/2021 (Fri) 19:21:26.
>>3483 Ahhh, ok, sorry for posting misinformation. All this time I thought that post was real, lol.
>>3483 What was the actual problem with the board, than?
>>3485 Kek, don't worry. >>3486 Which board do you mean? Are you asking what happened to the original iteration of /fascist/ when it got wrecked? Someone got into the board since my password was literally something like '123' and they proceeded to fuck with CSS, make the board unusable and then got the board shut down over that since the 8chan global rules said you had to have the board usable / accessible. The reason I didn't get control back of the board was because I didn't come and see what happened for too long afterwards, which of course made people upset (rightfully) and led to the board being given to a new BO.
Edited last time by FashBO on 04/23/2021 (Fri) 19:37:21.
(303.85 KB 541x800 Salute.jpg)
>>3487 OK, everything makes sense now. Thanks for explaining things. And thanks for keeping the board alive, even after everything that's happened, mega chad BO.
(393.61 KB 1680x1050 colored heil.jpg)
>>3488 (heil) >And thanks for keeping the board alive, even after everything that's happened I hope that our struggle of having to move and move has finally came to an end. I do not think that any board has had to move as much as /fascist/ has since the end of 8chan. We have had four different homes at this point, so really I have to thank anons like you for sticking around as we hop from place to place.
Edited last time by FashBO on 04/23/2021 (Fri) 19:47:44.
>>3422 >Achshually he killed kikes and faggot Actually he helped built Israel and empowered the jews in Russia, when Hitler came to kill they Bolsheviks. Stalin didn't "kill" kikes and fags, but only jailed pedophiles and anyone disloyal. This "le based Stalin" is a lie and delusion.
>>3432 >I don't see a problem with giving excess food to third world countries in the middle of a drought or international relief efforts You are a liberal, no wonder why /fascist/ on 8chan, civic nationalists and strasserniggers always attract homosexuality wherever they go. Next you'll say we're too harsh on the lgbt and allow them to co-exist. Literal retarded cowards who play too much EU4 and think they understand politics.
>>3499 *no wonder why /fascist/ on 8chan was filled with so many gays*
>>3422 >Achshually he killed kikes and faggots He potentially married a jew, has possible jewish ancestry himself, and helped established the state of Israel. Stalin was never against jews he didn't like the zionists who refused to stay absolutely loyal to him and then fact that Israel refused to join the Soviet Bloc and decide to be on thr Western capitalists' side of the Cold War. You guys can stop pretending you're totally agaisnt jews, and not just Zionism as well, because National Bolshevikism is bluepilled on race and then JQ in general. https://www.deathofcommunism.com/stalin-the-jew/ https://www.jweekly.com/2007/09/27/did-stalin-have-a-jewish-wife-and-stepdaughter/ https://fitzinfo.net/2021/03/21/the-soviet-unions-forgotten-role-in-the-creation-of-israel/ >>3432 >I don't see a problem with giving excess food to third world countries in the middle of a drought or international relief effort Of course you don't, because you have a liberal mindset just like all Nazbol cuck or even reactionaries do. Western countries don't need to be giving jack shit to other countries unless they are the same race as them at all. We need to focus and only care for ourselves and fight for our interests. I couldn't care if a nigger nation is on the bring of collapsed and their children are dying ever single day because of war, rape, famines, etc, fuck em, it's a waste of resources and time to ever care about people who wouldn't do they same for you if you needed help. Do morons like you ever not have cuck mentalities? >>3461 >muh synarchist anon >muh cancer on the boardz!!! Feel free to leave and fuck off forever. There's nothing more cancerous than oribiting around a faggot who's political opinions are about as retarded as niggers here thinking that there was ever any based/fascist-like communists. Get over it, we don't like non-Whites. The le ebin 8chan days are over and trying to bring them back is pointless.
>>3502 You lack nuance. There are a few high-IQ or fascism-inclined non-Whites with perspectives and information that we can learn from. No one is saying to fuck them. There are exceptions to everything, the slippery slope is only a Fabian tactic, stop looking for it everywhere. You could use some perspective because apparently you haven't been around long enough to recognize a fracture point and not be used as a useful idiot on it.
>>3504 >You lack nuance. There are a few high-IQ or fascism-inclined non-Whites with perspectives and information that we can learn from. Learn from what? You're ignorant even calling non-Whites "high-IQ" or there anything to learn from when all non-Whites all believe in the same or similar bullshit, such as civic nationalism, muh economics, muh equality, and the other stupid ism and stupid shit that does nothing of value. High-IQ people don't go on imageboards just to shill their crap ideas that they think only works in their mind. In reality your IQ is about the same as liberals and kikes. >There are exceptions to everything, the slippery slope is only a Fabian tactic, stop looking for it everywhere. >Fabian tactic You are literally the type of faggots I hated fuck off with your intellectual bullshit. >You could use some perspective because apparently you haven't been around long enough to recognize a fracture point and not be used as a useful idiot on it. That's funny coming from someone who thinks non-Whites have good advice, when they have the same sentiment as I do, whether they're as much as intellectual as you are or not. Their "perspectives" are the type of ideas that end up with Whites in being submissive. I don't need "broaden" my perspective you psuedo-intellectual virgin, especially from the type who always have nothing to say and pretend that they're totally fighting jews from reading retarded philosophy and liberal thinking points. There's no advice I need from a nigger other than telling me how I can rid of a problem that affects my race nor a , spic or a jew. Also you're calling someone a "useful idiot" is ironic, because you want us to take ideas from people who are idiotic enough to easily become brainwashed by kikes.
>>3504 Nice LARP, but there are no high IQ non-Whites, there aren't any high-IQ anons on /fascist/ at all either. The Mexican was a literal nobody who browsed the board spewing gay shit and you guys praised and worshipped him like Christ. We didn't lose anything from not having him on here just like Hitler didn't lose anything from calling Strasser a retarded liberal and banning his literal homoerotic idealology. We don't need non-Whites to broaden our perspectives for it has already been broaden by looking back at history, and reading literature that talks about how our world has come to the way it is and is completely fucked in every single way, which are also not from non-Whites. Telling someone to listen to a spic on political advice is liking asking us to take advice from a autistic cow.
>>3438 He promotes the 3p worldview. That's it, that's all I need. I don't care if he wants to say marx hates niggers to showcase how leftists are out of touch with their own founder's worldview or accurately saying that national socialism wasn't actually socialist regardless of Hitler's definition of it. >>3499 I don't think you know what a liberal is. >>3502 He certainly hated his daughter getting married to a jew enough to send him to Siberia. Also I'm not a nazbol but fuck you I'll take an intelligent nazbol over the iq89 chimp nig nogs such as yourself that invaded this board and tried to gaslight everyone into thinking it's always been filled with ethnoglobe retards when the reality was this board was filled with leftist leaning fascists and red-fascist sympathizers. Your underdeveloped chimp brain probably skimmed over this part >infact if we were to (rightfully) stop giving welfare to africa millions would die, but it would bring their population down to a level that only they would be able to sustain with their own technological development which would be needless to say, low in comparison to asia. If such a thing like that were to happen I wouldn't have a problem with the leftover populations getting aid from a crisis, but definitely not this overly inflated population number they have that's only being kept afloat due to the west's pathological altruism.
>>3504 >There are a few high-IQ or fascism-inclined non-Whites with perspectives and information that we can learn from. I've been on /fascist/ since it's creation and never saw anyone I could say was high-IQ at all. There was just anons who read philosophy, history and reacted to current trends and pretended they knew it all. >There are exceptions to everything, the slippery slope is only a Fabian tactic, stop looking for it everywhere Yeah no, you're asking us to work with non-White fascists nationalist who are willing to do anything to bring their country and race on top of everything. This isn't a Fabian tactic, which shows you don't really means. Can you stop shilling for once?
>>3507 >He promotes the 3p worldview. That's it, that's all I need. Sets a very low bar for the controlled opposition network using him and keeping him unbanned from platforms, doesn't it? >or accurately saying that national socialism He was inaccurately saying the opposite. Furthermore the goalposts from moved from "he's not a duginist" to "okay so he's a duginist, but they promote 3p (because he's allowed to deliberately by the very enemies of 3p)". He is practically a clone of every other "face of the alt-right" that were so "intelligent" enough to get articles about them in Time Magazine and other globalist rags before anyone knew who they were. >>3505 >entire post of generalizing and ignoring the end of the bell curve even though my whole point is to not do it to a fault What's next, telling Savitri Devi to go back to the kitchen? >you want us to take ideas from people who are idiotic enough to easily become brainwashed by kikes. Who, most Western Whites?
>>3509 >from moved from *have moved from
>>3507 >He certainly hated his daughter getting married to a jew enough to send him to Siberia. And that doesn't mean he hated jews. His daughter was a major sperg, so it only makes sense, but you should also know that the articles were on his marriage to someone who may have been jewess. >when the reality was this board was filled with leftist leaning fascists and red-fascist sympathizers You mean the faggots right?
>>3509 >What's next, telling Savitri Devi to go back to the kitchen? Your comeback is gay. >Who, most Western Whites? Stupid answer, but expected from an idiotic shill. No it's most Western shit-skins.a perfect example of what I'm talking about would have to be the Algerians in France who turn themselves into transvestites. Also jews aren't White, but your post I'll give your post an E for effort.
>>3512 Also let's not forget the Chinese and Koreans in America who are willing to do anything Israel's puppet tells them to do, along with their own home countries celebrating Judaism and reading the Torah to become spiritually jewish.
> If such a thing like that were to happen I wouldn't have a problem with the leftover populations getting aid from a crisis Yeah you're still a faggot. Let em die off period.
>>3508 >never saw anyone I could say was high-IQ at all Takes one to know one, I suppose. >you're asking us to work with And since you can't read, that would explain it wouldn't it? >>3512 >ad homs that got old in '03 /b/ You're deeply boring, and once again you can only give another example that also defines current Western Whites.
>>3509 Which platforms have unbanned him? He's had to jump ship to other platforms like the rest of us and he promotes alt-media for this reason. I'm not referring to that specific tweet but I remember a video about him talking about how national socialism wasn't truly socialist. I never admitted to him being a duganist either, I didn't mention it because it's not worth the time to do it since he doesn't promote eurasianism and doesn't want Ireland to be filled with non-Whites which would be counter to Dugin's race blind philosophy. People call him a Duganist because he takes an interest in the philosophy like he does with other philosophies counter to his politics and everyone else sees this and just runs with the memes. Don't know where you get the idea about him getting promoted from, he's been censored plenty of times. >>3511 >but you should also know that the articles were on his marriage to someone who may have been jewess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ He had his wife killed And yes, the people who built the board up so you can have a community to sperg out about "muh shitskins" in.
>>3515 >Takes one to know one, I suppose. No I'm giving (You)s to the ones who aren't. >And since you can't read, that would explain it wouldn't it? You just argued that we needed to take perspectives from other anons, aka working and assisting non-Whites, but go off. >Muh ad homs Do we have to go through this shit again? >>3516 >¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Please stop... >He had his wife killed Are your trying to make a point? He still impregnated her and have an entire state to Israel. Yoh aren't making a point. I may be a retard, but only shit you're gigantic faggot. You're the type of nerds to get shoved into lockers.
(30.61 KB 405x405 facepalm.jpg)
>>3518 >There's no such thing as left-leaning or right-leaning fascism and it misses the entire point of fascism in the first place. Actually, yes there is. Not every fascist nation employed the corporatist economic model. If there wasn't state oversight you might have had a point, but it's clear you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. You niggers need to go back to /pol/ where you belong, there's no reason not to at this point since it's 2 clicks away.
>>3516 I was speaking past tense, I recall him remaining unbanned as people that were actually promoting truths were being eliminated some years ago, while putting out the exact same vibe as the other subversionists like Spencer and all the other undermining grifters. They've all since "changed their views" somewhat to fit in more on whatever alt-platform they're harvesting user DMs on now I'm sure, and everyone has made a big show of being banned like Alex Jones, yes. Anon, all I'm saying is, don't follow him to the next Charlottesville.
>>3516 >He had his wife killed Pretty sure that she shot herself. Even if he did kill her it doesn't matter, because in the end he married and impregnated a jew and gave an entire state to Israel. The guy wasn't killing jews, because he hated them, he wanted loyality. >>3522 >Actually, yes there is Actually there isn't and putting us on the wings, defeats the entire point of fascism. Read the Doctrines of fascism and stop getting your information from idiots. >Not every fascist nation employed the corporatist economic model. Bluepilled, economics and le ebin compass is why is why fascist hated it and rejected in the first place. Also what fascist country didn't go by the corporatist economic model?
>>3508 >I've been on /fascist/ since it's creation and never saw anyone I could say was high-IQ at all I don't understand. Whites have better IQ than nonWhites. So all of /fascist/ are spergs/schizos?
>>3522 >Actually, yes there is >Not every fascist nation employed the corporatist economic model. Compelling and stunning argument. Thanks for confirming you don't understand what fascism is in the first place. There's no such thing as left or right wing you imbecile and the fact that you think of economics as a political leaning goes to show that you're dumbass newfag. Your mentality is literally on par with /pol/.
>>3525 >/fascist/ was filled with Whites Oh sweet summer child.
>>3521 >Are your trying to make a point? Nope, just having fun with it really. I don't care about his personal life or family tree or anything like that. My interest in him is in regards to how he reformed communism into what it became with the USSR. I'm surprised no one has made a big deal about him not even being an ethnic Russian yet tbh. >>3523 I think he did the same thing Fuentes did to avoid being banned which was not saying anything too out there and deleting the post that were controversial. He still got b& in the end anyway. >>3526 >>3524 >What is national syndicalism >Who is Sorel >What are proto-fascists hurrrr
>>3527 lmao you might as well say all /pol/ related boards over the web are just non-Whites shitposting. (Except for Neuchan)
>>3529 They practically are ever since Imkampfy molded the perfect little retard out of /pol/acks by subtly banning effortposters and removing book threads/self-improvement. That's why the modern /pol/ack is a fucking idiot, they all gestated in that instead of killing /pol/ and moving on like the better boards that produced Saints did.
>>3528 You said some fascist nations did not always use the corporatist economic model and I asked for what actual fascists countries did not use it. You're just taking a bunch of LARPs that you read about on (((Wikipedia))) and identify them as fascist. Also proto-fascists aren't fascists, they're inspirators of fascism and the men who lead to fascism and used a variety of different economics of what you consider to be either left-wing right-wing or mixed. >>3529 /pol/ and /fash/ were never filled with any Whites. These boards have always been Latino movements just like the Alt-right.
Any fascists who calls himself left or right leaning is not only retarded, but an enemy. This is just typical leftoids trying to take over a board that was never meant from them.
>>3532 It's also pointless, because we don't care much about what is considered to be left or right wing when it comes to social and economic policies. I want to use anything that would help my nation and kin even if it does originated from a liberal, but for some reason there are people trying to rebrand something artificial and made politics so stupid in the first place and think it's a good idea to do what the leftoids are doing. I think this explains why we are seeing the existence of tranny fascists.
>>3533 >originated meant originate whoops.
>>3533 Don't forget that fascists were often betrayed or let down by those who identify as one of the wings. I don't care what a bunch of leftoids from /fascist/ and their e-celeb of a spic thought. Left wing and right wing only exists to illude you that you can't take ideas from your opposition and something exclusive to democracies. I couldn't care for what can be considered left or right, what matters is that we strengthen and unify the ethnic faces of our nations.
>>3507 >the reality was this board was filled with leftist leaning fascists and red-fascist sympathizers That's exactly why I avoided this board like the plague in the 8chan days. Stop crying about /pol/ as if you didn't crosspost or browse there back in the day. A few of you fags are entering lolcow territory with your worship of some mexican anon and the constant kvetching about ethnoglobe, which is only a far away and abstract concept. I don't know how you can cry about /pol/ all day when it's a fact that almost all the IRL effortposters in the past 5 years have come from there. Just get over, stop the whining and move on.
(35.49 KB 681x548 1456022525722.png)
>>3532 >This is just typical leftoids trying to take over a board that was never meant from them. You are definitely a newfag gaslighting. No one but other newfags are fooled by this. You're the rapefugee migrants parasitizing off the community we built, not the other way around. >>3531 >You're just taking a bunch of LARPs that you read about on (((Wikipedia))) and identify them as fascist. Are you actually iq89?
>>3536 Then post over there niggerfaggot. Who the fuck would want to crosspost on /pol/? We left it for a good reason and it wasn't so we could turn into a smaller, slower offshoot of it.
>>3537 >You are definitely a newfag gaslighting. >MUH G-GASLIGHTING I can tell by this post alone that your skin is softer than baby shit. You even cry like a left winger, I wouldn't be surprise if you were also going under a sex change as well. I don't care what the old board was like or not, there's nothing stopping you from making your own board. If you're high-IQ enough, then it shouldn't be a problem for you to shit-up a single posts with your TOR samefag.
>>3537 >Are you actually iq89? No argument, only ((( ad homs))), sorry buddy going to have to invalidate your opinion and arguments, until you decide to argue like an adult and not someone who was dropped on his hard enough to give him brain damage.
>>3539 I have a board and you have yours. Back to /pol/ nig nog.
>>3541 *head*
>>3542 I'm not from /pol/ and there's nothing from stopping me from posting here, so sad too bad?
>>3542 My bad I thought you responded to me.
>>3542 Lol is this the BO?
>>3548 BO is too nice to to tell the migrants to GTFO.
>>3547 >If the premise is retarded to begin with why should I take the time to "debunk" it? Or maybe it's just that you don't have an argument and being disingenuous. >If I bring up D'annunzio are you also going to dismiss him as a LARPer? The moment you use him as argument, is the moment I'll remind you that he was hated by left-wingers in Italy and switched his political standings. You aren't making a point and using D'annunzio isn't going to change what I said about how it's retarded to put yourself on the wings.
>>3541 If the premise is retarded to begin with why should I take the time to "debunk" it? If I bring up D'annunzio are you also going to dismiss him as a LARPer? Following the same logic in that post you likely would, so I don't really care.
>>3549 True, he allows manchildren, who cry /pol/ and throw tantrums over boards to stay. :^)
(88.05 KB 500x474 Gay nerds.jpg)
This thread in a nutshell.
>>3550 Are you also going to debate with radlibs about the validity of putting pre-pubescent children on puberty blockers or are you going to say they're fucking retarded for thinking such things? If anon wants to dismiss Sorel as a LARP despite influencing our worldview then I'm dismissing him as retarded, simple as. Honestly you're putting too much into the left leaning and right leaning comparison. There was movements that were more focused on workers and there were some that guaranteed private enterprise. The thing that ties them all together is the state. To say that there were no left or right leaning movements is disingenuous when the most famous example of Strasserism was in opposition to Hitlerism despite being both fascist.
>>3554 >Are you also going to debate with radlibs about the validity of putting pre-pubescent children on puberty blockers or are you going to say they're fucking retarded for thinking such things? This was a shit comeback and even you have to admit it. Although this does seem something right on your alley along with the other left wingers go trans. >If anon wants to dismiss Sorel as a LARP despite influencing our worldview Sorel doesn't say anything intelligent or anything that needs to be known. Who cares if he inspired your worldview? You are a retard for thinking that ism are good ideas. >Honestly you're putting too much into the left leaning and right leaning comparison. There was movements that were more focused on workers and there were some that guaranteed private enterprise. Yup I'm telling you that they're both retarded. Fascists shouldn't care whether you're a worker or capitalist, because they dickson between both is bad and meant to divide people. The jew has worked to exploit this all the time and you're ignorantly for it. >The thing that ties them all together is the state Yeah and a fascist state should rid the existence of left-wing or right-wing or any class and political division for the sake of stability and cooperation. >To say that there were no left or right leaning movements is disingenuous when the most famous example of Strasserism was in opposition to Hitlerism despite being both fascist. To say there exist a such thing as right or left wing is dumb, because it means that you recognize (((democracy))) and its lies meant to divide all classes within society on purpose. Strasserism isn't National Socialism for it and misses the entire point and meaning of what NatSoc is all about. You are red-liberal and I'm done talking with you. I could spend my time talking to a brick wall and get more of an intelligent conversation than out of (You).
>>3556 >Fascists shouldn't care whether you're a worker or capitalist Maybe they should have cared more because it was the capitalist class that helped to sabotage fascists in the war. >To say there exist a such thing as right or left wing is dumb, because it means that you recognize (((democracy))) and its lies meant to divide all classes within society on purpose Are you seriously fucking telling me all this time you were thinking of the American definition of left and right? Goddamn you are fucking dumb, neck yourself immediately. >Strasserism isn't National Socialism for it and misses the entire point and meaning of what NatSoc is all about Really? Because Strasserism was the original party, not the Hitlerist faction that overshadowed them. >You are red-liberal and I'm done talking with you. You couldn't even tell the difference between what left and right actually is, If anyone is stuck in a liberal mindest it's you.
National Bolshevism? National Syndicalism? ust say you're /lgbt/ and have daddy issues and go bro lmao.
>>3562 National Syndicalism? More like National Faggot! Ayyyy
(62.71 KB 720x960 cosplayer.jpg)
Why yes I am a National Syndicalist, how could you tell?
>G-god you're fucking dumb, now I have to dilate my giant piss hole as I pray to femboy Stalin, because you rent free in my head! N-neck yourself immediately bigot!
>>3435 Keith is a Irish twink who thinks we need to work with a bunch of grifters and feds who don't do anything but Tweet and shill 24/7 and then turns out to gay. >Luckily for most Whites we don't need to expand into areas inhabited by other races, we already did it long ago with America, Australia, and etc. Nah fuck you, we're expanding in every places and cucking every race. If you want to suck big black nigger cock or if your girl needs a tumbling in bed while you watch, then go to Africa and fuck off from imageboards forever.
>>3567 K, good luck taking Rhodesia back irl and not just doing it with gsg to cope.
(16.68 KB 683x384 untitled2.png)
(296.04 KB 1150x800 IMG_20210417_151556.png)
I swear to יהוה if I have to endure another FILTHY FUCKING STRASSERITE BOLSHEVIK PUSHING HIS RETARDED IDEOLOGY IN 2021 STRASSERITES AND "NAZBOLS" DO NOT HAVE GOOD INTENTIONS. Strasserism was a proxy for Russian bolsheviks and when they flopped politically became a straw man "fascist" group. They aligned themselves with the homosexuals and troons, and were funded by kikes for the purpose of getting rid of Hitler. 100% of "nazi troons" and "pink swastika" images that strasserites spam on cuckchan in a desperate attempt to get people to join their retarded ideology can be (ironically enough) traced directly to strasserites from the past, with their entire ideology being filled with fags and troons. "Nazbols" aren't free of this either. 2 of the troons I spoke to on twitter were both nazbols, and every time they mentioned their mental disorder, they also made sure to describe themselves as fascist, even though they very clearly are not. You can see the same thing happening in trans-nazi discord servers. Literally every one of them are strasserites and nazbols larping as NS in order to discredit Hitler and National Socialism. This can also be observed for the forced "fascist femboy" meme. It was never organic, yet it keeps being shilled by these people. These ideologies are projecting, homosexual and troon-loving, crypto-bolshevik, kike-funded, and disloyal. In other words, they are just modern communist that can't escape the reality of race. They give up successful fascist social organisation and economics in failed communist ones. They can't get away with it. Expose false-flagging strasserites and nazbols whenever you see them, and call them out for being subversive parasites whenever they acknowledge their strasserite beliefs.
>>3570 >cope Go back to cuckchan >K, good luck taking Rhodesia back irl You make it seem as if it was impossible to bring it back. Rhodesia lost due to the Soviet Union, and Western powers cucking put and appeasing to their jewish masters. It worked perfectly fine with Whites having most of them power and doing everything, despite being a minority in their own state. Even Africans fought for Rhodesia were happy to have Whites ruling and populating the area and knew it was more of a fair state than the communists. Just like how you're serving your jewish masters by being a gigantic faggot who thinks modern isms matter. I don't care if you don't like ethnoglobe or not, or whatever faggy political leanings you're on, but don't come here shilling stupid shit and telling us that there's such thing as left or right. I swear to God I have never found people like you guys who always turned out to be homosexuals or contain kike ancestry. >>3577 >Nazbols" aren't free of this either. 2 of the troons I spoke to on twitter were both nazbols, Marxism always attracts the weak, stupid and inferior, so it only makes sense there would be trannies within their idealology. I also argued with one on Twitter on how the idea of being part of the lgbt and accepting them completely defeats the purpose of National Socialism, and he gave an asshurt answer about how all workers matter, no matter their "sexuality" or race. What's the point of being fascist if you're just going to be act as communist?
>3583 >Even Africans fought for Rhodesia were happy to have Whites ruling and populating the area and knew it was more of a fair state than the communist Since when? Many WNs meme Rhodesia bc it proves that White men used to take action. Wouldn't what you say shit on the narrative?
>>3526 > There's no such thing as left or right wing you imbecile Maybe there's no in America or in most ZOG'd countries, but I think what you're saying here's really a tired meme that needs to die. The basic definition of a leftist is a slave moralist who always sides with the "oppressed" and "downtrodden" against (natural) hierarchy, and pushes forward agendas such as egalitarianism, equal rights and the idea of "progress". Under this framework we see that 99% of everyone in the mainstream today are leftists of some stripe, especially from a historical standpoint since these ideas would be totally foreign in the past. True right-wing is affirming hierarchy, tradition, inequality and the like. Today all that exists is leftists and super-leftists, and all of them are really just puppets of the jew. Even Christians are leftists and don't know it. Maybe the real paradigm is Natural Law versus anti-Natural Law, and free versus jew-controlled
>>3593 >Since when? Are you really being this retarded? Blacks in Rhodesia could vote and had better conditions than today of what used to be Rhodesia. > Many WNs meme Rhodesia bc it proves that White men used to take action. WN use it as an example that Whites are internationally hated and could make a state fair and prospering state and everyone in the world would still seek to destroy. > Wouldn't what you say shit on the narrative? You're aren't very smart. Philosophy not only makes you gay, but retarded as well. INB4 you samefag with your IP and then TOR like a coward.
>>3606 >WN use it as an example that Whites are internationally hated and could make a state fair and prospering state and everyone in the world would still seek to destroy. I half-assed this. *WN use it as an example that Whites are internationally hated and could create a state that is fair and prospering for everyone and the world would still seek to destroy it and the White people within it.
(179.49 KB 612x816 untermensch.jpg)
>>3583 Absolute bullshit. You'll see a small minority of Africans say they want Whites back because they're starving now but the vast majority of them like controlling their own country despite having to resort to stealing White farmland. Same with S.Africa. Most of the niggers there aren't even native to SA but that still doesn't stop them from celebrating overthrowing boer rule and taking it for themselves and running it to the ground. I have no doubt in my mind your physiognomy. It's the same short head, thick lipped, wide nosed nigger like features that all self-respecting Whites from a century ago could tell would lead to it's modern low iq counterpart.
>>3609 > You'll see a small minority of Africans say they want Whites back because they're starving now You see communists saying this you dumbass. Mugabe was the one who made them think this way in the first place. >but the vast majority of them like controlling their own country despite having to resort to stealing White farmland This mentality was rarely in their minds before, because niggers were too stupid to give a shit who ruled the land they inhabit as well, because they were given their own land and autonomy. Again Mugabe was the one who lied and told niggers that "Whitey stole muh landz" and they fell for the lie, because Africans don't think to ask how and why. >Same with S.Africa. Most of the niggers there aren't even native to SA but that still doesn't stop them from celebrating overthrowing boer rule and taking it for themselves and running it to the ground. Again their celebration was out of ignorance and being fooled into thinking they were benefiting themselves. We can clearly see that they regret this now and I've even seen blacks mock their stupidity thinking that murdering White farmers was ever going to help them. Even the Zulu tribe who fought the Anglo called out the niggers and their stupidity for being fooled by the Marxist thinking that they could ever rule and prosper the lands that Whites built and developed. It's easy to manipulate stupid people and make them think that the White man is evil, which is why the jew always uses non-Whites. >I have no doubt in my mind your physiognomy. It's the same short head, thick lipped, wide nosed nigger like features that all self-respecting Whites Yeah sure, keep LARPing as a White man Jamal. You have a inferiority complex and obsession with IQ, but maybe that's because in reality you're nothing more, but another self-hating Amerimutt with a brain of a nigger and the phenotype of a spic.
(87.61 KB 427x448 nazbol.png)
I think the real question is what exactly does National Bolshevism even imply. Okay, so we have the idea of nationalism or the importance of the nation-state implied in the first half, but what I really want to know is what does "Bolshevism" in this context imply? Does it still imply Marxism materialism or atheism - something which is clearly a failed model in practice? Does it imply class war? - there's nothing wrong with putting the capitalists under control and stopping them from betraying their race and nature (as they are prone to do) but when it comes to the idea of eliminating other classes entirely, this is just simply impossible. Hierarchy is natural to all complex societies and all attempts to dissolve it have only led to the formation of new classes. If it is mainly these two differentiators I fail to see the appeal of "National Bolshevism", as these alone are basically fantasy-tier or undesirable elements. Nazbolism is a false path.
>>3657 The Marxist idea of class is totally divorced from the hierarchy apparent in the Natural Order. Marxist "class" is purely based in the material, or "who has more money than I," in theory - in practice it sabotages and attempts to undo the aforementioned natural hierarchy. To that point, nationalism is in part the belief that your nation rests atop the national hierarchy. In other words, nationalism and bolshevism/marxist socialism are irreconcilable. The "National" half of "National Bolshevism" is a veneer, a front, a facade, but in practice the ideology is thoroughly anti-Nation.
>>3702 To be clear, when I speak about "the Marxist idea of class being divorced from natural hierarchies in theory" I am not saying "the theory is good or correct," just that it's intent is not to dissemble natural hierarchy, even though that has historically been the result.
>>3702 >>3703 The problem with Marxism is that in practice it is 100% a moral theory. Marxists are prone to deny this by saying that it is merely a former of ‘analysis of class relations / class struggle’, but in practice this Marxism doesn’t exist. As has been discussed here before, Marxism is best viewed as a materialistic Abrahamic religion of sorts. Any Marxists advocating for natural hierarchies and anything not kosher to the general leftist program of slave morality would instantly be reviled as a ‘Nazi’ or ‘reactionary’. As soon as Marxism comes in contact with reality this is inevitable, because the real world doesn’t work on *allegedly* disinterested theories of class struggles and material conditions. Marxism and related theories will always find their home best in losers, the resentful, the envious, subhumans and those with no other place to go. Nietzsche was right about these people. So essentially you are correct. A truly nationalistic form of Marxism will never exist. What happens in practice is the following—either the natural values will to an extent win over, and the regime will adhere to a thin veneer of socialism and support Marxist talking-points occasionally in words but not deeds (think North Korea), or the leftists will keep pushing and pushing until they are put down either by those more grounded in reality, or until they are killed off by people who have had enough of the madness. Ironically enough most third world ‘Marxist’ nations went the first route. They mostly de-Marxized and only adopted the ideology to get support from the USSR and to sweep away the old social structures so that globohomo industrualization could be adopted all the faster. Real modern Marxism has its home in the West today, and it is highly potent. It’s the natural conclusion of Marxist thought, and all leftist thought, and Nazbols need to realize this fact.
(1.09 MB 875x590 ClipboardImage.png)
>>3423 Keith Woods was just providing a platform for Christcucks yesterday, I think this is even more proof that he is a bad influence on our circles.
>>3764 On his Youtube channel, of course. They all go back after a street-cred ban, don't they?
(909.51 KB 929x4200 nazbol based.jpg)
nazbol is basically >appreciating the authoritarian and economic aspects of stalinism and third world socialist dictatorships while also supporting NS its not that deep
(120.46 KB 480x563 laughing marx.jpg)
>>3808 >appreciating the economic aspects of Stalinism Top kek.This is why no one likes you faggots. There's nothing to appreciate here. It's even funnier to look at your meme and see Hitler lumped in with Nazbols. It's almost like you people have not read Mein Kampf, or even Otto Strasser's alleged dialogue with Hitler from 1930. Not only is it funny since Otto Strasser published it himself, but he gets BTFO by Hitler on his own dialogue. He completely dismantles Strasser's socialism, ideas of class struggle, ideas of nationalizing everything and other pozzed, Marxist ideas. https://institutenr.org/2016/12/30/hitler-vs-strasser-the-historic-debate-of-may-21st-and-22nd-1930-otto-strasser/
>>3808 >jew lovers are nazbol >Trump is nazbol >Putin is nazbol Holy fuck you people are retarded and gay. No wonder why you attract so many trannies and it's because you have so much in common lol. Most of the people in this image are faggots and never actually supported the working class.
>>3808 The last thing you want to do is claim that Stirner, the degenerate individualist anarchist faggot who hated socialism, along with Jim Jones the guy who ran a crazy death cult, as nazbol. The rest of the meme is just outright wrong and doesn't make any sense. As matter of fact I would argue that Gaddafi and Hitler are probably the only ones who did more to become the enemy of the jews and support the working class than anyone else. This meme just doesn't make sense especially when Hitler, Stalin, and Putin all helped jews.
>>3812 >Hitler, Stalin Putin I'm retarded I meant Trump, Stalin, and Putin, but my point still stands.
>>3812 >Jim Jones the guy who ran a crazy death cult You'd be surprised to find some WNs who would believe he's based for killing so many niggers.
>>3814 >>3812 >>3810 I think the pic is supposed to be an obvious meme (at least one would hope), though this is obscured by the fact that the post it is attached to appears to be in good faith. Really besides Hitler the only good figures in that pic worth even having a debate about are Pol Pot, Gaddafi and Idi Amin
>>3820 >I think the pic is supposed to be an obvious meme It's hard to tell, because nazbols have made similar memes that are just as bad. >Really besides Hitler the only good figures in that pic worth even having a debate about are Pol Pot, Gaddafi and Idi Amin Is it true that Pot, Gaddafi, and Amin all had soft feelings for Hitler?
>>3829 >It's hard to tell, because nazbols have made similar memes that are just as bad. Yeah at some point the irony gets so heavy I can't even tell anymore. >Is it true that Pot, Gaddafi, and Amin all had soft feelings for Hitler? Idi Amin eventually became aware of the nature of the jews and said that he understood why Hitler killed them this didn't happen, of course since they subverted Germany and it is obvious that the Israelis / jews are not working in the interests of the world. I don't know about Gadaffi or Pol Pot. The only reason I mentioned Pol Pot is because he was an ethnonationalist, or at least professed to be (read pic related). The major problem with Pol Pot though is that he was shipping tons and tons of rice to Communist China while his own people were starving, which is not very nationalistic. I even read conspiracy theories allegedly held by some Cambodians from after the DK years that China was trying to depopulate Cambodia for Chinese settlement. There's no real proof of this, and Pol Pot and his closest associates actually abandoned Communism in the years after the Vietnamese toppled and them and continued to wage war. If anything, we could say that he was a utopian leftist with somewhat ethnonationalist / racialist leanings.
>>3808 Please tell me this is a joke..... >>3829 Armin understood why Hitler fought against the jews around the time he got J-pilled. Although there's no information on what Pol Pot thought of the NSDAP, and Gaddafi can only be said to be similar to Hitler in a way that they are both hated by jews and wanted to save their country from the debt slavery. I do have a theory that Gaddafi had soft feelings for Hitler, but he just didn't want to openly admit it due to the lies spread around about what the Germans did during the WW2 and how they were going to ethnically cleanse everyone who weren't them. >>3832 >The major problem with Pol Pot though is that he was shipping tons and tons of rice to Communist China while his own people were starving, which is not very nationalistic Don't forget that Pol Pot also worked with the CIA, which was also a mistake on his hands as well. You could argue that he only wanted to use them or maybe it could be because he was not aware of who they were during his contact with them, although sooner or later he should of realized that you never relax around CIAniggers, especially if they can gain something from your successes.
>>3859 Gadaffi also seemed very aware of his role in preventing Europe from being flooded with blacks. He knew what would happen if he was removed, and warned / threatened Europe over this fact. Not saying that he was /ourguy/, but he knew what was going on, to say the least, and that is why the jews destroyed him and had him brutally killed. Pol Pot must have gotten tied up with the CIA after he was kicked out of power, because otherwise it just doesn't make sense to me. Before he came to power, the United States was just flat-out carpet-bombing Cambodia, leading to at least some 150,000 deaths. Eventually it was the Khmer Rouge who toppled the US-supported regime of Lon Nol and executed anyone they could get their hands on from the old regime. This makes it hard to think that he was a CIA puppet at this point. Many leftists too are just butthurt that Pol Pot killed Vietnamese people just for being Vietnamese and genocided Muslims, as well as going to war with Communist Vietnam for Lebensraum
>>3832 >>3859 >>3862 I get why some would understand Gaddafi, but Pol Pot was a maniac. He starved his own people. Plus he sends people to gulag over idiotic reasons like being bespectacled. As for Idi Amin, he knew about the kikes but he was a fucking cannibal. If he wasn't one, then good for him.
>>3808 >appreciating the economic aspects of stalinism I'll never understand why people choose to side with tried-and-failed bolshevik economics rather than the highly successful fascist economic system. Is it edginess? In any case, "NazBol" will always evolve back is National Socialism, as their economic weakness gets worse.
>> 3876 >Is it edginess? Kosherness. Governments and mega corporations aren't tracking down nazbols and arresting or blacklisting them. It's a non-threat ideology, which makes it a safe hobby.
>>3879 This also explains why they are so weak on race and the ethnic struggle as well. It's better to be apart of no idealology, than suck up to the jew, because you're too "radical".
(1.31 MB 1025x1500 POL POT URBANITE FERTILIZER.png)
>>3866 >Plus he sends people to gulag over idiotic reasons like being bespectacled This is pure propaganda. Cambodia in the 1960s and 1970s was an extremely rural and poor country. Most of the country was composed of peasants, none of whom would have had many Western luxuries like glasses. On top of this, the people of Phnom Penh and other cities were often capitalists and foreigners. There was almost no working class in the Marxist sense either, it was extremely small. So if one is fighting a revolution ostensibly against all things Western, urban and capitalistic, and is separating and treating the proponents of these ideologies and activities as different from the 'purer' peasants less infected by modernity, it would in fact make sense why those with glasses were treated badly, if this is not complete bullshit in the first place, and the reason would not because they need glasses therefore they're evil, but due to the fact that them owning glasses marks them out as a member of a class of people that the Khmer Rouge set out to abolish
>>3884 He's a communist.
(87.50 KB 1119x686 pol pot kampuchea.jpg)
>>3885 Correct, but not in the Marxist sense despite how aligned himself. That's what makes him so interesting. What we see with the Khmer Rouge is a genuine example of an ethnonationalistic movement that persecuted / killed ethnic minorities, liquidated foreigners and capitalists in the cities and then basically instituted a two-tier caste system. Check out this post that I made back on 8chan /fascist/ here >>3832 (attached pic) where I show that Pol Pot and his movement were closer to the non-Marxist Narodnik movement in pre-revolutionary Russia more than anything else.
>>3764 Oh no, the horror! Giving a nationalist Christian a platform to try to dispel out of context lies told by LARPers! With how much you try to divide nationalists into these tiny obscure categories I'm starting to believe you're a kike.
>>3969 It really is horrific, because I value the Truth. Leading one into falsehood and glorification of a jew as the Son of God is horrific, and once one accepts this basic premise, their mind is primed for all sorts of other doctrines that could very well be harmful to nationalism. Abrahamism is no tiny problem.
>>3971 And what alternative do you offer? A reconstruction of a religion long since dead that you have to take from it's last remaining relative from India, or pure atheism where everything is broken down to it's material components? No one is going to flock to either of these in a noticeable amount except for atheism given we're in globalist hell right now.
>>3972 Well atheism is clearly not the solution, as it has shown itself very inadequate in almost every regard. Interactions with these people alone and the voting statistics (indicating how left-wing / progressive self-described atheists are) show all of this fairly conclusively. When it comes to Christians, I would never try to lead one into atheism. I think that would be a mistake, and I would not feel right about doing that, but I have tried to free them from Christianity when I could. I have never had any success, but I have broadened the horizons of some at minimum. With paganism, I don't think it's as bleak as you think. In some parts of the world we're already seeing small, yet still remarkable revivals—the example of Romuva in Lithuania and the various forms of Rodnovery in Russia are good examples of this. The problem with reconstructionism is that it's almost purely exoteric. It is not a problem to look into how our ancestors performed rituals or how they spoke or looked, but this is clearly not what a religion is founded on. A religion that is purely exoteric is missing its spiritual heart. What is needed is a genuine rebirth, one that may incorporate the elements of the ancient traditions, but will also be something of its own. The will only be done when someone hits literal Vishvamitra or Buddha levels of enlightenment. The Truth is always accessible, and what is needed is direct intuitive insight into said Truth. The entire system of Aryan spirituality flowed from the top downwards from suprarational and transempirical insight into reality. Not everyone can reach this level, but a small number can. Mainstream Christians today are reliant almost solely on flimsy things like 'faith' and not direct experience of God, and this is where they fall short. Faith might be enough for most people though, I cannot entirely fault them. For pagans today, they think that merely aping the external actions of their ancestors is enough, when it is clearly not. Personally though, I do not see the problem with borrowing concepts from India. Many of them are rooted in great wisdom and truth, parallels of which can be found in numerous traditions around the world. I adhere to a semi-Perennialist view though, I must admit, and believe that Truth has often expressed itself in many different ways.
Is it just me or are a lot of nazbols are Satanists?
>>4013 A lot of these weird 'ideologies' (if they can even be called that) cluster together. It's sort of like mental illness. When you're one, you're more likely to be a whole cluster of others. Satanism is a whole rabbit-hole of its own. Why and how it got associated with Fascism or National Socialism or any other sort of related set of ideas is beyond me, but I know it's malicious, just like those people who laud Aleister Crowley
>>4015 >A lot of these weird 'ideologies' (if they can even be called that) cluster together. It's sort of like mental illness. True, but why Satanism? I don't see how you're going to own the jew by becoming like them. >Why and how it got associated with Fascism or National Socialism or any other sort of related set of ideas is beyond me, but I know it's malicious, just like those people who laud Aleister Crowley I think this lie was spread on purpose or misunderstood, because of some Satanist had supposedly claimed to be fond of Hitler. NatSoc Satanism has to be nothing more, but a psy-op to subvert modern NatSoc. And you would have to be dumb to use Crowley as an example, because he loved Lenin and didn't care for Hitler that much at all. I think he even admitted he preferred Communism, which is just further proof that communism no matter how "trad" will always attract sodomites.
>>3885 He's not a Communist, he hated Marxists as much as we do.
>>4020 Satanism appeals to edgy rejects, and unfortunately National Socialism has been made attractive to edgy rejects through its demonization by the jew in the course of the latter half of the 20th century and beyond. Satanism appeals to the atheist as well. It is materialistic, indulgent of the ego and desires, not to mention that a load of it is quite transparently ripped off from Nietzsche, Ayn Rand and Ragnar Redbeard. Satanism is a psyop, as can be seen obviously in things like the Order of Nine Angles. I would argue that you are downplaying Crowley's influence too much. ONA has been influenced by him, and echoes of it can be seen in LaVeyan Satanism. Wicca too is a direct mashup of Freemasonry and Thelema as well.
>>4026 >I would argue that you are downplaying Crowley's influence too much. ONA has been influenced by him, and echoes of it can be seen in LaVeyan Satanism. But like you and I agreed on, Satanism is a psy-op. The Order Of Nine Angels can't be legit NatSoc group, but just a bunch of glowies made to make White supremacy look worst than jewish terrorism. Also wasn't LaVeyan exposed as a CIAnigger cult?
>>4027 LaVey was a kike and was a close associate of another pedo creep named Michael Aquino, who was lieutenant colonel and military intelligence / psychological warfare officer in the Army. I haven't looked into this stuff too deep but that alone is telling.
(149.83 KB 1284x1265 EzlvpMEUcAgO1CW.jpeg)
>>3829 Lol you think that meme is bad? Check this shit out nigger.
>>4069 I don't see how the meme is wrong. It's low effort, but pretty accurate.
>>4070 Ah yes Occupy (((Wall-Street))) the most racist or rejectors of anti-racism and greatest threat to capitalism with their orgy camps, druggie hippies, mutts LARPers who cry about muh land, and their retarded protestors getting pepper sprayed and shot by rubber bullets for being spergs.
(345.02 KB 1440x907 occupy_wall_street_cc_img.jpg)
>>4070 No it's not, correct, look at his own chart which proves him wrong. It literally shows and proves that racism was bitched since the fucking 80s (even though it started and grew in the 60s) and that the left never saw racism, even after the cold war, as fake and gay and a non or lesser issue. OWS shouldn't be used at all as an example of nazbol or le based leftists, because they were always bitching about muh racism like a bunch of soyfreaks and using it to paint wealth inequality and mass poverty on the fault of Whites. OWS was never a threat to capitalists nor capitalism ever for they were just a bunch of dumb protestors controlled by the jew, and their goals and actions were the same as #niggerlivesmatter. I had a feeling someone on here was going to agree with this shit-tier meme lmao. Repost to fix my previous shitty post.
(104.60 KB 460x268 william pierce.jpg)
>>4069 Go spend a few days listening to old William Luther Pierce broadcasts from the late 90s and early 2000s. The exact same stuff that we are talking about today was being talked about, and he regularly cites articles and outlets peddling such things. Also the meme here >>4069 makes it look like there was literal militias about to overthrow the government and kill all of the bankers, but in reality it was a bunch of smelly hippies living in tents and banging on drums and holding "clever" signs up for the media owned by the same people they were protesting against. Americans don't even know how to protest. Just compare Euromaidan or even fucking Gilets Jaunes to the average American protest.
>>4076 >No it's not, correct, look at his own chart which proves him wrong. It literally shows and proves that racism was bitched since the fucking 80s (even though it started and grew in the 60s) and that the left never saw racism, even after the cold war, as fake and gay and a non or lesser issue. OWS shouldn't be used at all as an example of nazbol or le based leftists, because they were always bitching about muh racism like a bunch of soyfreaks and using it to paint wealth inequality and mass poverty on the fault of Whites. OWS was never a threat to capitalists nor capitalism ever for they were just a bunch of dumb protestors controlled by the jew, and their goals and actions were the same as #niggerlivesmatter. I had a feeling someone on here was going to agree with this shit-tier meme lmao. Repost to fix my previous shitty post. I think what you are failing to grasp is the sheer change in how it's been used to silence Whites and create a massive divide between different groups. Think about how these kikes work- when they sense the masses coming together to revolt against their jewry what do they do? Divide and conquer at fuel it warp speed. If they keep everyone fighting with each other they can continue jewing unmolested. In 10 years they've brought the entire Western world to it's knees,, to crisis. The immigrant flooding of Europe started in 2011 as well. OWS was the catalyst for their accerationism which led to GamerGate, and the voting for Trump.
>>4114 >I think what you are failing to grasp is the sheer change in how it's been used to silence Whites and create a massive divide between different groups. OWS never cared for White people or the truth, it was always just a bunch of middle-class retards pretending to be poor and oppress for state gimmes. No one in OWS ever said shouted that it was Whites were becoming poor, taking the biggest hit from the economy, and suffering from the hands of the banks. >Think about how these kikes work- when they sense the masses coming together to revolt against their jewry what do they do? Yeah listen here, if you're going to "revolt" against the jew then don't go around spreading aids, doing drugs, and shitting things up while holding protest signs and crying about muh 99%. Rarely did anyone at OWS treat the situation seriously and in the end it became a big fat joke that was easily infiltrated by the jew. I don't know why you're still trying to defend them and act as if the jew subverted and destroyed them when they were always kikes. >Divide and conquer Again there's no one to work with who doesn't share the same motivates as the jew. >If they keep everyone fighting with each other they can continue jewing unmolested And the fascist and right-wingers are the only ones trying to actually fight the jew. > OWS was the catalyst for their accerationism which led to GamerGate, and the voting for Trump. What are you talking about? OWS never accelerated anything other than annoyance and hatred for hippies and how they're useless hacks who literally need to pay people and promise the return of pozzery during their lame protests, for anyone in jew York to give a fuck about Wall-Street being kikes. OWS never lead to gamergate, because GG was filled with a bunch of ancaps who didn't like leftists injecting their politics and ruining the market for the industry, which had nothing to do with OWS. And the vote for Trump was nothing more, but one gigantic shill for MIGA from boomers who didn't like liberals not shilling for Israel enough, and a disguised vote for right-wingers who were dissatisfied with the current state of America and hoping for more social conservatism with Trump. You nazbols or whatever political leaning you are, need to stop this LARP about muh divide and unification with non-Whites or "fellow workers". There's no possible way to work with people who are completely brainwashed and have racial hate for Whites no matter what. If you ask a leftoid what they thought about race and the JQ, then they're just going to say the same stupid shit about minorities being oppressed under White people and cry antisemitism. It's time to recognize that the only revolutionaries who actually attacked the banks and capitalists now were usually ethno-nationalists, because Marxists and every leftists as a whole do not give a shit about the banks. Excuse my cuckchan lingo, but I'm seeing a tremendous amount of cope from former leftists who won't admit that their views were always gay and filled with the slave moralists, because their ideals were for them this whole time. But I'm just making assumptions based on your post.
>>4124 >nazbols or whatever political leaning you are, need to stop this LARP about muh divide and unification with non-Whites or "fellow workers" I've only seen non-White ethnonationalists doing this on telegram. Are they considered nazbol?
>>4124 >OWS never cared for White people or the truth, it was always just a bunch of middle-class retards pretending to be poor and oppress for state gimmes. No one in OWS ever said shouted that it was Whites were becoming poor, taking the biggest hit from the economy, and suffering from the hands of the banks. I never stated that OWS cared about White people, only that it was a catalyst and tipping point for normal fags and some leftists who saw what was happening in 2008, how jew banks like Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers siphoned wealth away from people, destroyed a large portion of the middle class and respective job market and got rightfully pissed off about it. This scared the jew bankers on Wallstreet into ramping up the war on Whites as a divide and conquer stratagem to misdirect their anger towards their main enemy. They do this shit all the time, why do you think they are forcing Muslims into every aspect of our lives and creating hatred among us? They want to destroy two of their enemies with one stone. >Yeah listen here, if you're going to "revolt" against the jew then don't go around spreading aids, doing drugs, and shitting things up while holding protest signs and crying about muh 99%. Rarely did anyone at OWS treat the situation seriously and in the end it became a big fat joke that was easily infiltrated by the jew. I don't know why you're still trying to defend them and act as if the jew subverted and destroyed them when they were always kikes. I'm not defending hippie trash at all, in fact I could care less what they actually did at the event. The point I'm trying to make is that as limp dicked as the OWS movement was, it clearly set off alarm bells in the bankster jew's head to ramp up the division and hatred among everyone, pre-OWS was a much less (albeit not safe) hostile environment for Whites in general. Since they have continued to push for more and more division, they are terrified that people may put their differences on hold to come together and get rid of the real threat. >Again there's no one to work with who doesn't share the same motivates as the jew. This is only a half-truth. There are many Whites who openly and faithfully serve the jew, and many many non-Whites aswell, but there are still other factions who share our knowledge and understanding of the true problem. >OWS never lead to gamergate, because GG was filled with a bunch of ancaps who didn't like leftists injecting their politics and ruining the market for the industry, which had nothing to do with OWS Actually it did, think about it. If OWS didn't happen and the bank jews didn't start accelerating their divide and conquer pozz harder and faster, the poising of video games wouldn't have been so blatant as to cause a reaction (GG). Trump's election came mostly from disenfranchised Whites who were sick of the communist trash they were fed everyday, they (foolishly) believed that they could vote their way out of jew hell. I'm stating that one event led to another, constant tensions rising between the dividers and Whites who sense their race and freedoms being under attack and looking for solutions. >You nazbols or whatever political leaning you are, need to stop this LARP about muh divide and unification with non-Whites or "fellow workers". There's no possible way to work with people who are completely brainwashed and have racial hate for Whites no matter what. First, I'm not a nazbol and I hate bolshevism with all of my being, but you are not seeing the big picture here. These jews want us to focus our hatred on these other groups to distract us from the real problem. There are many non-White trash who are openly hostile to us, and they can never we worked with and must be death with - but to imply that every single one is a lost cause is foolish at best. The biggest fear of the jew is people uniting across groups, across racial/ whatever lines to target them and rid themselves of their slavery and poison. They constantly kvetch about this and say shit like "it is a bad day for us when the left and right come together". Think about it, why do you think they brought the non-Whites here in the first place? Why do you think they promote sexual deviancy etc? To cause division and strife while they "suck the milk of the gentiles" like parasites while we are all fighting each other.
>>4132 (con't) >If you ask a leftoid what they thought about race and the JQ, then they're just going to say the same stupid shit about minorities being oppressed under White people and cry antisemitism. It's time to recognize that the only revolutionaries who actually attacked the banks and capitalists now were usually ethno-nationalists, because Marxists and every leftists as a whole do not give a shit about the banks. Excuse my cuckchan lingo, but I'm seeing a tremendous amount of cope from former leftists who won't admit that their views were always gay and filled with the slave moralists, because their ideals were for them this whole time. But I'm just making assumptions based on your post. There are plenty of former leftists who had the intelligence to figure out that the same jews are behind both Communism and Capitalism, and their banks funded both, as as such abandoned their previous views. It's obvious at this point that the others are a lost cause. In-fact any vocal anti-White, pro-communist group at this stage is a lost cause. However; there are plenty silent men/women of different backgrounds who don't subscribe to those views and are waiting for a chance at change, even a temporary unified movement against a common enemy. With the mask slipping and millions of normalfags seeing the hook-nose behind the curtain a perfect storm is forming where we may have an opportunity to work in unison against the jew, temporarily putting our main ethno-centric goals on hold. Just something to think about.
>>4132 >but there are still other factions who share our knowledge and understanding of the true problem. Can you list those factions? Most of those of the "factions" who recognize the JQ, are usually small and filled with very few non-Whites who don't act as subversives like /pol/ served. I don't see any non-White factions fighting kikes as much as fascists are trying to do now. I just see non-Whites and "fellow White people" working with together to undermine and fight agaisnt Whites. Again like anon said this isn't a video game, the mind to work with White supremacists only worked for men like Malcom X, because he had brains enough to realize what was going on with America, and that it was better working with White supremacists than kikes and black panther. Now no other non-White thinks like Malcom-X or spic NatSocs today.
>>4127 >Are they considered nazbol? I don't see why not if they consider themselves to be nationalists and in support of some sort of state socialism.
>>4132 >I never stated that OWS cared about White people I know you didn't say it you're missing the point I'm getting at. If unification was ever possible at hand, then is would of recognized the fierce struggle of White people. You can criticize the banks all you want, but when your entire ideals are more-so about having more butt sex and crying for minorities to get free shit without the jew needing to divide and subvert you, then there's no possible way for Whites and non-Whites who hate banks to unite against a common foe. >This scared the jew bankers on Wallstreet into ramping up the war on Whites as a divide and conquer stratagem to misdirect their anger towards their main enemy. What proof is there that this scared the jew? The jew hides and cowers behind the pigs and inside their million dollar homes, why would they fear protestors who held up signs and flags and not guns with bullets? I'm not just talking about the OWS either, but most movements that called out the banks and market were just dumb protests. >This is only a half-truth. There are many Whites who openly and faithfully serve the jew, and many many non-Whites aswell, but there are still other factions who share our knowledge and understanding of the true problem. Can you list those non-Whites and actually list the ones who are fighting against the jew in as great or greater numbers than the National Socialists? >Actually it did, think about it. Um no it actually didn't you're just making stuff up now. I don't have to think about this, because you can simply look up GG and go through all the archives of 8chan's /v/ and it was indeed mostly ancaps who did not like the direction where ethical journalism was going, due to an increasing amount of Buzzfeed-tier being written for games. GG demanding for better ethical journalism from the gaming media did not share the same goals as OWS. > If OWS didn't happen and the bank jews didn't start accelerating their divide and conquer pozz harder and faster, the poising of video games wouldn't have been so blatant as to cause a reaction (GG). Again there was literally no relation of OWS to GG being created. Ancaps hated OWS and lauded at them for criticizing and shitting on capitalism. OWS might as well not happened, because it got no one other than leftists to play pretend about how much they hate the banks and capitalism as they buy and drink Starbucks and deposit money into their ATM. >I'm stating that one event led to another, constant tensions rising between the dividers and Whites who sense their race and freedoms being under attack and looking for solutions. Lol, but OWS' spergy and degeneracy was literally one of the reasons why Whites did not like the change of cultural in 21st century America. For WN they voted for Trump, because they hopped for him to change the trends of things and make America more pro-White, while boomers disliked the direction of political correctness and disregard for Judeo-Christianity. Again OWS didn't lead to GG or the vote from Trump, it was an example of how the internet spread lies and controls the minds of people like the MK Ultra project was implemented. >These jews want us to focus our hatred on these other groups to distract us from the real problem. Yes you are correct, but you're missing my point. Non-Whites and liberal Whites are dumb enough to fall for their tricks. I mean why do you think jews are able to divide huWhites, spics, and niggers against each other in the first place? >>4133 >There are plenty of former leftists who had the intelligence to figure out that the same jews are behind both Communism and Capitalism, and their banks funded both, as as such abandoned their previous views. I know this and most of those leftists are either reactionary, fascist, or national socialist, because we're the only ones who recognize the same thing and trying to defeat them. > In-fact any vocal anti-White, pro-communist group at this stage is a lost cause. I mean pretty much, which is what I'm saying about leftists and the non-Whites who act like to play doll house with hating capitalism lol. > However; there are plenty silent men/women of different backgrounds who don't subscribe to those views and are waiting for a chance at change, even a temporary unified movement against a common enemy. I agree with this, but I'll say like >4137 said, the people who acknowledge what is actually going on are a small minority. Most women are either NPCs or couldn't care less in the world about the truth, and niggers only want free shit and the chance to chimp out and claim that they wuz kangz.
>>4185 >With the mask slipping and millions of normalfags seeing the hook-nose behind the curtain a perfect storm is forming where we may have an opportunity to work in unison against the jew, temporarily putting our main ethno-centric goals on hold. Which is pointless, because most normalfags/NPCs I've seen who have awaken to what is going on are usually young Whites and boomers who finally realized that their generation was dumb and malicious. And this is all due to the anti-White rhetoric we are facing in our countries and across the world at the same time.
>>3435 >Right, but Keith... than people that want what's best for our race. Kieth is a subversive culturally, or possibly actually, Christain faggot, he is not an Irish nationalist, he doesn't want whats best for Irish people he wants to sit on his dysgenic ass and do nothing for his people but constantly counter-signal the warriors and fighters who actually seem to be the only ones making sense these days. This is all or Nothing, it has never been anything but all or nothing! Shitskins are OKAY you say, Why are so many of them in the cities of my country, my land, land built by and for White people? Is that nigger down the street, who raped a White girl, okay? How about the spic who did the same the other way? how about the thousands now crossing the border violating our borders? Many of whom are undoubtedly agents of the cartels, who are very well organized, and because they are not suppressed at every turn like Whites are, have a damn good shot at ethnically cleansing half the southwest of everybody else once lawlessness occurs. ARE THEY GOOD? ARE THEY OKAY? The answer is no, and the ones who are back at "home" are being supported by the money the fuckers here make, in essence steal from us, and most of them actually save that money it to get here themselves through better means. The members of our race who would join you in whining and bitching about "MUH VIOLENCE" are, just like you, traitors. You and everybody like you fails to see the issue that deportations aren't going to stop shit, they know where we are, they know we have better societies than they do, and they will never stop coming! >A place for every race . . . resources of which we can just trade for. It doesn't sound nice to me, it sounds like you want to be lazy, that you want your descendants to be lazy and to fall prey to the same shit we are now again. I do not want this, I would rather see the earth burned in atomic fire than to keep seeing this disgusting state of affairs occur again and again because the weak elements of our people refuse to do what is necessary. We do not need to trade for resources, firstly because giving them anything in exchange for something we could simply take and kill those who complain about it, is detrimental to our people what are we giving away? Technology? Thats worked out extremely well for us so far. Medicine? the result of this is 1.4 billion chinks and Indians respectively, almost as many Arabs and nearly 4 billion niggers, all of which damage the environment in ways we have never done, sure we did some bad shit but we turned it around very soon after the damage was done, in most cases. Clothing? This one isn't bad per se, but it is pointless, Resources? we've done this and they squander it and use what we give them against us to hurt us, why would we continue doing so? >Like I said, . . . due to the west's pathological altruism. First, ask yourself why you think you stand against "Pathological Altruism", when you are in effect simply shilling for more of it. Also, ask yourself where it comes from, it's not natural to our people it's a symptom of a particular Abrahamic Mind Virus. Just stopping the aid to Africa would kill billions, while at the same time killing a HUGE portion of what nature is left there, as the niggers consume everything to survive. What little technology they do have would be destroyed within 50 years if not shorter, what they can't destroy would simply wear away. Asia, is not going to keep going at all, everything China specifically does is supported by the US, when it goes, china loses most of it's economy, and it will not be able to forestall things such as the inevitable collapse of the three gorges dam, which might go this year and kill about 400-800 million or so?
>>6729 >Kieth is a subversive culturally, or possibly actually, Christain faggot Keith isn't a Christian nor even culturally, he wants to be a muzzie and LARPs on this retarded lie about being anti-zion"ism" as if any of Abraham's crap wasn't zionist in itself. He is definitely a subversive, because I've never not met a nazbol who wasn't a cuck, jew, or just all-round retarded shills. The (((Dugin))) shills and apologism was a red-flag on his twitter to exposing that he doesn't take the issue with kikes seriously. >>3435 >Right, but Keith isn't saying prioritizing your group is sociopathic, he's an Irish nationalist himself Kill yourself defending an e-celeb. Keith used to be or is still possibly a (((duginist))) shill who wants to appeal to muzzies and unironically believes that they're more anti-semitic than Christcucks, despite the fact that jews hate CIs more than mudslimes.
>>6746 Kieth is culturally Christian, he follows Christian morality, being an Anti-Nietzschean dipshit. You can try and claim but his morality isn't "real christian morality" but then you would have to account for just how similar the origins of Christianity are to what is happening now and your entire argument will fall to pieces. Btw the way the Jews do not in the slightest fear the CI niggers, because they are confidential informants by and large, one need only look at the story of David Lane to confirm this.
>>6757 > Anti-Nietzschean What is his critique?
>>6758 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxRdW7KmffQ see the idiotic take for yourself, it looks like he hasn't read even half of what it takes to understand Nietzsche.
>>6757 >Kieth is culturally Christian, he follows Christian morality, being an Anti-Nietzschean dipshit Mudslimes are also against Nietzsche as well. >Btw the way the Jews do not in the slightest fear the CI niggers I never said fear, I said they hate CI and it's quite obvious why they hate them. For one, Christianity is the dominant religion among Whites and Europeans have a history of constantly killing and expelling jews, which was been done more often than anyone else. Whether the priests were sucking them off or not, doesn't exclude the fact that local peasants and nobles hated jews.
>>6760 They don't hate them either, CI niggers are a direct line from British Israelism. The CI niggers are naught but an inwardly Zionist Philosemitic Psyop that neuters the resistance of any dumbass who buys into it, very similar to bas christianity, it does this by double reinforcing the idiocy of believing "JeWsUS IS CoMIiIuNg!" and makes one, or perhaps simply reveals how one is, philosemitic by placing the jews history in place of our own, as a falsity this is a betrayal to our people of the highest order. In comparison to the outwardly Zionist and Philosemitic, British Israelism which does the same but is more open about it's intentions placing the power in the hands of the british royalty who perpetuated the straight bullshit. Christianity is shit and has ALWAYS aided the jew, few nobles were anti-semitic, most, even in many cases the vocally "anti-semitic" ones, directly aided jews in escaping the wrath of peasants, and in finding them new homes, whose ire for the jew had NOTHING to do with christianity and everything to do with the actions of jews themselves. No, the pre-christrian Romans still hold that record for both killing and expelling jews, the christains never came, and never will come close.
>>6759 Eh, I don't think Keith is 100% off the mark here. There are certain aspects of Nietzsche which aren't good, and as Keith points out, those are the aspects of his thought that have to do with relativism and the denials of things such as absolute truth and the like. Where Keith is wrong where he says this stupid shit about how the modern elites are somehow fundamentally Nietzschean in their outlook. Nietzsche was right in a lot of things. He saw this degenerate herd society coming, and he accurately diagnosed the core of Christianity and how its adherents work, especially the leftists of today. He also was right to an extent in talking about the influence of perspective on the formulation of some peoples ideas of morality. I think Keith was fairly on the mark when he was talking about how we believe ourselves to have the Truth on our side even though we are currently lacking any real financial power or elites of our own. This sort of shit about Nietzsche or Christianity being the two paths available to us is just a false dichotomy. He also makes some good points about the modern ontology and its problems.
>>6762 >They don't hate them either You're actually retarded. I swear to god ever since neuchan invaded /fash/ the braincells of this board has drained away. Jews do hate christians you moron, they hate christlovers, because they're mostly White, the bible having mention of how they're the synagogue of satan which means evil in Abrahamic context, and (((jesus))) naming his own kin for their degeneracy, which makes sense, because jews are fucked in the head. The British israelism was a LARP to replace the semeites with Europeans, not kikes being friends with christcuckery. This anti-xtian faggotry is starting to get annoying and repeitive and to an extent the mutts on this board are shitting on their ancestors, just because they're asshurt about x-tians.
>>6763 Keith is parroting better men, and poorly so, criticize Nietzsche's relativism all you want but at least be original in doing so. I, for one, don't think Nietzsche actually believed there was no such thing as Truth, there obviously is. Nietzsche seemed to me to be making a point about how it isn't exactly the truth that matters, but the story that the lesser men are made to believe, one reason he finds Christianity abhorrent is precisely because it makes the worst most disgusting men think they are noble, and that they are inherently better than the strong, and the noble who are evil and sinful in christianity simply for being strong. Moral Relativism is, at least partially, the truth morality is different depending on the situation and the people whom you are dealing with. Objective morality and adherence to it, is part of what's killing us now. The only truly objective part of morality is preserving and living in accordance with the Natural Order, this is fairly simple but can be extremely difficult to accomplish in todays world. It seems like you're telling me that on the blindingly obvious, Keith is okay but beyond that he's an idiot and begins to break down. It's not really a false dichotomy, or a dichotomy at all, Nietzsche is part of the truth and Christianity is not, one is false down to it's origin, the other seeks the truth, through denying truths existence. .
(150.80 KB 967x753 christgolem.png)
>>6765 >I swear to god ever since neuchan invaded /fash/ the braincells of this board has drained away. /fascist/ has always more or less been redpilled on Christianity. It has nothing to do with Neuchan or Neinchan. Indeed, many of the anti-Christian posts on this board are among the most insightful. >Jews do hate christians you moron Of course they do. An assassin does not drink his own poison. >they hate christlovers They would love for more White people to be good little Christians, worshiping a Jewish god and following the slave morality of the Bible. It would effectively neutralize them as a threat if Whites were to do so. >because they're mostly White Most Christians today are brown mud-people. Christianity is literally exploding in Africa. >the bible having mention of how they're the synagogue of satan which means evil in Abrahamic context The oft-quoted 'synagogue of Satan' bullshit is a meme. What it speaks of is 'those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.' So wait, they're not really Jews? This means that a Jew was calling another group of Jews fake Jews, which is apparently an insult. Do you believe you are a Jew? I hope not. >This anti-xtian faggotry is starting to get annoying and repeitive and to an extent the mutts on this board are shitting on their ancestors, just because they're asshurt about x-tians. You shit on thousands of generations of your ancestors when you reject their gods and their traditions. Even above that, you side with the demon Yahweh against the true God, who is not a Jew, and who is the true power behind this universe.
>>6766 Regarding what you say on Nietzsche and Truth, this is certainly possible. I would have to go back and read some things first to make any sort of firm conclusion on the matter. >Moral Relativism is, at least partially, the truth morality is different depending on the situation and the people whom you are dealing with. What you describe here is totally reconcilable with systems of objective morality. The traditional concept of Dharma or a Cosmic Order in Indo-European systems of spirituality was exactly as you describe. Different groups and types had different roles within the Whole, according to their own particular natures. Dharma is remarkably context-sensitive. It is at once a cosmic, eternal principle at the general level, but corresponds to a plurality of different laws and duties within human societies. >Objective morality and adherence to it, is part of what's killing us now. The only truly objective part of morality is preserving and living in accordance with the Natural Order, this is fairly simple but can be extremely difficult to accomplish in todays world. I would say here that false pretensions at objective morality is what is killing us. People pretend that it is objective, but it is far from this, very far. Indeed almost everything society considers wrong / evil today on the social level was seen as normal and natural just a little over a century ago (think different roles for the two sexes, the fact that races are real, to name a few). True morality is indeed expressed in the Laws of Nature. It is objective in that no one, no matter who they are, can escape its justice, though the blowback is not always immediately discernable >It seems like you're telling me that on the blindingly obvious, Keith is okay but beyond that he's an idiot and begins to break down. Haha, perhaps so.
>>6765 >You're actually retarded. I swear to god ever since neuchan invaded /fash/ the braincells of this board has drained away. And you're a shill, before neuchan existed you niggers said Nein, and before that, you probably bitched about 8/pol/ or some other fucking place, Not only is >>6768 completely correct but you added a layer on top of that showing who you are. >Jews do hate christians you moron, they hate christlovers, because they're mostly White. This is false on both fronts, Jews do not hate christains, they love them, because all of them even the CI niggers(whom I was referring specifically to in my previous post) are their slaves, and the vast majority of christians are niggers and other various non-Whites, like South Koreans who are mandated to read the Talmud in school and somehow this hasn't lead to them killing jewish businessmen in Korea. >The bible having mention of how they're the synagogue of satan which means evil in Abrahamic context, and (((jesus))) naming his own kin for their degeneracy, which makes sense, because jews are fucked in the head. Setting aside that jesus never existed. the Synagogue of Satan would have been in his eyes, were he to have existed, Whites or any other goyim who followed jewish religion or, as the CI niggers do, larp as jews. So, the "Synagogue of Satan" is the Catholic and Protestant churches peppering the planet, as well as any, non-jewish christians. >The British israelism was a LARP to replace the semeites with Europeans, not kikes being friends with christcuckery. This is a lie, the British Israelists were literally run around and by a member of the royal family and they were OPENLY Zionist and Philosemitic, even a cursory amount of research would show this which just reveals you haven't even looked. >This anti-xtian faggotry is starting to get annoying and repeitive and to an extent the mutts on this board are shitting on their ancestors, just because they're asshurt about x-tians. I have walked the lands of the dead in my dreams and in deep meditation. Most of my ancestors who were nominally Christians, are in the Nordic realms, with Othinn and the other Aesir and Vanir. They know the mistakes they made and also had forced on them in life, those who were Christian in full, truly sincerely "christian", those who truly became the race traitors the doctrine of christianity demands they become, are not there. where they are I know not, but I get the feeling they are but husks being fed upon by the jewish god. I will continue to shit on those ancestors who betrayed the race as christains and those who were only nominally so, are not insulted, because in death they know the truth.
>>6771 >/fascist/ has always more or less been redpilled on Christianity This has nothing to do with the fact that neucucks are on here with their retarded cuckchan lingo and 24/7 asshurt about christlovers. And you're lying, because /fash/ had a some christians. > It has nothing to do with Neuchan or Neinchan. It has everything do with you low IQs, because OG /fash/ wasn't this annoying and spergy. >Most Christians today are brown mud-people Most Whites today are still christians, so you're not making point. > What it speaks of is 'those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.' So wait, they're not really Jews? Yes that's the entire point of why Jesus cried about them in the first place. His entire revolt was against supposed "new jewry" that was a case of how Israelis truly became decadent. The old jews beforehand were not a threat of the Aryan until the Greeks and Romans conquered most of West Asia and became world powers. Otherwise they were just stealing and doing their typical shittery in the Middle-East along with harmful trades that got Whites to hate jews and avoid doing trade with them. But the war against jews didn't began until Alexander conquered and his successor states occupied Jerusalem. >You shit on thousands of generations of your ancestors when you reject their gods and their traditions LOL you're an idiot, I'm not christcuck. Also it can be said for you as well, because you fools call anyone who worships Yahweh and Jesus a retard, not realizing this also includes your family-lines who have been christians for centuries. You're shitting on your ancestors as much as they do simply, because they aren't apart of your grand LARP that no one on this board actually practices or really care about at all as some of you samefag a fake opposition as if they would would ever come on this board after seeing the constant bitching about Abraham in each thread. Fucking idiots.
>>6771 >And you're a shill >I-if you don't agree with everything I s-say, then you're a shill! >before neuchan existed you niggers said Nein, and before that, you probably bitched about 8/pol/ or some other fucking place, All of those place are fucking shit and filled with actual shills and faggots like yourselves. You constantly come on this board only to say repetitive stuff that has already been said and understood. The low quality posting needs to stop and the subjects need to change for actual solutions. >This is false on both fronts, Jews do not hate christains, they love them >because all of them even the CI niggers(whom I was referring specifically to in my previous post) are their slaves, >which is why jews sided with mudslimes in every conflict against christians and Europeans >which is why they constantly bitch about muh expulsion being unjustified after CIs got sick of their shit >which is why they love mocking the kike on stick and hate everything about him and refuse to recognize him as a prophet >which is why they kill and torture x-tians in Israel >modern christianity hasn't subverted into full-blown Judeo garbage >Europeans have always been slaves of jews and never attacked the jew back during the age of christcuckery Like I said you're retarded. >This is a lie, the British Israelists were literally run around and by a member of the royal family and they were OPENLY Zionist and Philosemitic They were openly zionist and semites in their own sense of the word, because they were already pretending that they were true semites. You tell me that I should do research, but wikipedia agrees with me and there's no reason to lie about absolute retardation on the part of the British who hated their non-Abrahamic Anglo-Saxon heritage, to make such a dumb lie just to empower christian identity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Israelism >Adherents believe that the Twelve Tribes of Israel are the twelve sons of the patriarch Jacob (who was later named Israel). Jacob elevated the descendants of Ephraim and Manasseh (the two sons of Joseph) to the status of full tribes in their own right, replacing the tribe of Joseph. A division occurred among the twelve tribes in the days of Jeroboam and Rehoboam, with the three tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and partially Levi, forming the Kingdom of Judah, and the remaining ten tribes forming the Kingdom of Israel (Samaria). Thus, they argue, "the great bulk of Israelites are not the Jews". W. E. Filmer, writing in 1964, suggested that the fact that some Jews continue to search for the ten lost tribes implies that their representatives are not found among modern-day, multi-ethnic, Jews.[31] A number of British-Israelites quote Josephus in order to support their claim that the lost tribes of Israel are not Jews: "the entire body of the people of Israel remained in that country; wherefore there are but two tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while the ten tribes are beyond the Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude." >Parfitt suggests that the idea of British Israelism was inspired by numerous ideological factors, such as the desire of ordinary people to have a glorious ancestral past, pride in the British Empire, and the belief in the "racial superiority of White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, and Aikau characterized the movement as being "fundamentally about providing a rationale for Anglo-Saxon superiority. To Kidd, its theology represents a "quasi-heresy," which serves to "blunt the universalist message apparent in the New Testament. Its role in fostering anti-semitism in conservative Protestant Christianity has been highlighted, along with its role in fostering a feeling of "racial chauvinism" which is "not always covert". >I will continue to shit on those ancestors who betrayed the race as christains and those who were only nominally so Except most christians didn't betray the race and were pretty racist and kept their ancestors traditions in the end to abide by the eternal truth that even x-tians cannot ignore. If you don't believe me, then you can look at how the Anglo, Spaniards, Italians, Greeks treated muzzies and African slaves.
>>6807 >kikepedia agrees with me Sure thing
Same poster as before btw. Not on tor. >>6806 >24/7 asshurt about christlovers. And you're lying, because /fash/ had a some christians. Retards like you are why Christianity is constantly talked about here. Christianity is a subversive form of Jewish death-conditioning. It’s as clear as the sky is blue, therefore when some retard comes and starts spouting this pro-Christian nonsense they ought to be called out for it as many times as it takes. I’m sure there are Christians here, but they’re afraid to get debunked by pagan anons because to put it bluntly we can’t be debunked. The arguments are clearly on our side. I’ve argued this stuff hundreds of times and have never gotten a satisfying response. >/fash/ No one calls the board this, because it’s not the board’s name. You are likely an outsider. >Most Whites today are still christians, so you're not making point. Yes, most Whites are Christians nominally, just as they adhere to other similar subsersive doctrines such as democracy, liberalism, egalitarianism, cultural marxism, anti-racism, atheism, etc. Christianity is just another form of Jewish mind-virus killing our people. And it is a religion for mud people and slaves. >His entire revolt was against supposed "new jewry" that was a case of how Israelis truly became decadent. Jesus didn’t revolt against shit. He was just another hippie jew preaching apocalypticism who was critical of the Judaism of the Temple. Many Jews were such as John the Baptist and the Essenes. These people still despised goyim as animals, foresaw their destruction and hated Aryan Rome (See: Essene ‘war scroll’) I will warn you now, any verse about Jesus whipping people in a temple, or referencing swords are all about Jewish prophecies and have nothing to do with actual violence and bloodshed, so don’t even waste your time quoting them at me, especially when these gospel accounts were written decades after Jesus’ supposed life and death, making them meaningless and horrible sources. >I'm not christcuck. You’re dangerously close to be a traitor to your race with how you defend this Jewish death cult. You should get the same treatment as if you came in here and started shilling for anti-racism (‘ugh, come on, so many Whites are anti-racist, we can’t repudiate this doctrine!!’) >you fools call anyone who worships Yahweh and Jesus a retard, not realizing this also includes your family-lines who have been christians for centuries. They were forcibly converted by the elites. They were victims, and were mostly illiterate peasants who didn’t know better. I pity them, truly. People today have no excuse. They have the ability to READ and LEARN the truth about (((Christianity))) and what it has done to our people. We no longer have to be enslaved to this foreskin-hungry demon. OUR ABRAHAMIZED ANCESTORS WERE FORCED TO WORSHIP A “GOD” FROM THE DESERT, A LIE, A DECEPTION, YET YOU EXPECT US TO PERSIST IN FALSEHOOD???? >your grand LARP that no one on this board actually practices or really care about at all Keep coping. Abrahamism is false. Yahweh is a demon and literally exists. The gods literally exist. There is a God. The pagan picture of reality is 100% in line with the world around us. >Fucking idiots. Jesus was a jew btw
(15.46 KB 260x183 756475674.jpg)
>>3490 > I do not think that any board has had to move as much as /fascist/ has since the end of 8chan. I'm going to one up you. All the pedo boards since the dawn of 4chan. 7chan,12chan and 8chan that all literately started as sanctuaries for them. Two enemies hunted by the same system often ended up taking shelter on the same platforms. When one became censored you knew something was up. 8chan changed when it started banning boards and it didn't start with anything /pol/ related.
>>6818 Under a fascist system pedophiles will be hunted down even more ruthlessly than they are today.
>>6819 I've stopped watching porn because if that reason alone. Porn made me to be way too desensitized to the point where anything goes in my brain. Mind you, I never saw CP in my life. And yet my brain does the intrusive thoughts bullshit. (Yes I was the guy in the QTDDIOT thread). So far, my worries have lessened. The thought appear from time to time but I've put my thoughts into my studies and videogames more often. If the urge to gap ever happens, I'll try to not watch porn instead and use imagination. But holy shit, the fact that I can resist it for almost a week now is interesting.
>>6826 Sorry for any spelling errors, was on a rush.
>>6826 >>6827 Glad to hear you from you again and to hear that you are doing well and making progress, anon. Keep it up.
(2.51 MB 1920x1080 2021-01-12_DPRK_Congress#18.png)
(1.22 MB 1920x1080 2021-01-16_DPRK#1.png)
(1.32 MB 1920x1080 2021-01-16_DPRK#17.png)
(1.76 MB 1920x1080 2021-01-18_DPRK#11.png)
(1.81 MB 1920x1080 2021-01-18_DPRK#13.png)
>>3424 >Stalin's USSR was still quite active in funding anti-fascism activities throughout Europe and attempting to subvert free European countries. Hitler's Germany literally did the same? When they literally conquered their neighbours with fire and blood? Time and time again, you fascists vindicate the stupidest Stalinists when you consider yourselves the lapdogs of bourgeois capitalist traitors. Even Goebbels did it, unfortunately. Never forget that it was the fascists who supported the degenerate Weimar Republic! Who needs enemies with such friends? >One could almost weary of being a prophet, since the bourgeois world simply does not want to see. They are entirely unmoved by the horrible misery that Bolshevism brings upon the unfortunate peoples that fall under its power, waiting until it reaches them when defensive is usually impossible. https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb84.htm Why, oh why do you ever look towards the West? Don't you understand that the enemy is Christian America? And everything it spawns? Even American Communists are... gay! America is the vilest nation on Earth. Neutralise America, and then something beautiful will emerge. >>3428 >My point is that in order for communism to work he had to heavily modify it with national characteristics that the theory of Marx didn't account for This is correct, in part. Theoretical Marxism prophecises the dissolution of the state, and I can almost sympathise with anti-Communists. A modern Russian Marxist such as Klim Zhukov can claim the Soviet Russians fought not for Russia but... for a superior economic system! Utterly disgusting. Of course, Juche Korea has never professed to dissolve itself, LOL! But both the USA and the USSR have done so. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kZNqqcpc5U >>3428 >It does come off as sociopathic in the vein of loving your own people because you make it an all or nothing dichotmy where you aren't willing to help others if you're in a position to do it to no detriment to your own people. It isn't necessary for nationalism. All foreigners are your enemy. Aiding foreigners is only justified if they are used as a weapon - the Zimmerman Telegram to Mexico, Khrushchev's anti-colonialist Negrophilia, the Pyongyang-Hanoi-Havana axis. But the moment they no longer need you, you will be abandoned - see the Korean history for examples; where were the Russians, the Chinese, the Vietnamese when the Koreans starved to death in the 1990s? Politics is dog eat dog, the harsh survival of the luckiest murderer, make no mistake.
(63.21 KB 600x338 Children-in-mines.jpg)
(50.15 KB 600x331 Childminer1.jpg)
(56.57 KB 600x284 Childminer2.jpg)
>>6819 >Under a fascist system pedophiles will be hunted down even more ruthlessly than they are today. But the age of consent will be lowered to ca. 15. Our ancestors did it while malnourished and eating acorns and straw. Modern 15 year olds are healthier than any 25 year old of yesteryear. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breaker_boy It's honestly sickening how modern folks decry the supposed modern exploitation of children - when little boys and girls in the past were made to work for 10 hr. a day in the coal mines! >>6826 >I've stopped watching porn because if that reason alone. Porn made me to be way too desensitized to the point where anything goes in my brain. Never understood this argument. But I won't press the issue, as I never considered the sight of naked men pounding whores with tanned skin more arousing than stills of tastefully-clad ladies. I guess, I must be a NazBol gay pedo then.
>>6877 We should avoid terminology like "age of consent." This phrase now implies something besides commitment. Our ancestors married off young females to relatively-older men, and other species have seemingly analogous practices as well, although "age of consent" is now entirely sexual (i.e. recreational, not necessarily constructive/procreative) in the public lexicon.
>>6880 >>6877 Are we being raided or something? This is such an enormous lie that there's no chance it's organic.
>>6881 All of these freaks from some blog ran by a non-White Mexican who feels that he can smugly talk down to Whites and tell them what they need to be doing. Every one of them who has crawled in here has routinely been mentally ill like this and bad for /fascist/
>>6881 It isn't a lie though. Are you the guy who was arguing for the ZOG-approved age of used up, telogeny infected 18 year olds in the other thread?
>>6897 >Paedoposting Yeah we have a problem here, the mods on this site are compromised. Paedophiles from 8moe?
(582.80 KB 790x1100 pride family.jpg)
>>6881 What that guy is saying about the AoC is pretty accurate, I think. It's been discussed here several times before in the woman threads and in the unpopular opinions threads. The term 'AoC' is degenerate and makes people think exclusively about casual sex, which is part of a larger societal problem itself that is detrimental to the healthy organic societies that we wish to create. We should be talking about early marriage instead. In almost every Western nation you can legally sleep around with niggers before you can legally get married. This is an absurdity. Early marriages alone would be a major factor in saving the West, and I say this unironically. If men and women got married with no chances to sleep around, marriages would be stabler. There would be less divorces. Children would then grow up in a more stable and healthy environment. This idea of fixing marriage can't happen in a vacuum though. Earlier marriages will indeed fix some of the issues of feminism, but as long as women are blasted with propaganda to make think that they ought to be pursuing college degrees and working for Jews, many of the problems such as low birthrates, female entitlement / arrogance and unstable marriages will continue. A girl of 15 or 16 should be preparing for motherhood and learning how to care for a family, not learning a bunch of bullshit STEM garbage or taking gender studies courses.
>>6899 >Early marriages alone would be a major factor in saving the West There are currently more Whites than ever before. Even if we destroyed the entire none-White population of the world, we'd still be overpopulated. The maximum population of the world that can be sustained indefinitely is around the current population of the European Union. Simply put, no, it fucking doesn't. There's no saving the West by fucking children, you degenerate filth. The problem isn't that White people are not breeding enough - we can easily sustain our own population indefinitely as it stands, and infact are overpopulated with that in mind. What we have a problem with is the fact that Africa is rapidly growing, to the extent that even if your filthy paedophile fantasies came true and we could instantly create traditional families similar to the Gaelic Clans where each woman has an average of five children in her lifetime, you would still be outnumbered by niggers who have been doing this to a greater extent since the 1960s. It is clear you have no real perspective of the world and have simply attached yourself to right wingers thinking you will be accepted for your degeneracy. Kill yourself. The only saving of the West is to overcome the differences between Russians, Americans, Germans, Australians and actively unite to keep our countries secure. You clearly have no fucking clue what's coming.
(499.79 KB 472x750 Hitler10.png)
>>6898 >NO YOU CAN'T JUST WANT TO MARRY FERTILE GIRLS IN PUBERTY LIKE ALL MEN HAVE THROUGHOUT HISTORY Fuck off to Reddit you oversocialized feminist Christcuck. Hitler himself supported early marriage. The Laws of Nature are on our side. <To wage war against syphilis means fighting against prostitution, against prejudice, against old-established customs, against current fashion, public opinion, and, last but not least, again false prudery in certain circles. <The first preliminary condition to be fulfilled, before the State can claim a moral right to fight against all these things, is that the young generation should be afforded facilities for contracting early marriages <Late marriages have the sanction of a custom which, from whatever angle we view it, is, and will remain, a disgrace to humanity, an institution which ill befits a creature who is wont to regard himself as having been fashioned in God’s image <Marriage is not an end in itself but must serve the greater end, which is that of increasing and maintaining the human species and the race. This is its only meaning and purpose <This being admitted, then it is clear that the institution of marriage must be judged by the manner in which its allotted function is fulfilled. <Therefore, early marriages should be the rule, because thus the young couple will still have that pristine force which is the fountainhead of a healthy posterity with unimpaired powers of resistance. <Of course early marriages cannot be made the rule unless a whole series of social measures are first introduced without which early marriage cannot even be thought of.
>>6900 I'm increasingly convinced you're the schizoposter commenting above the link on Cesar's blog.
>>6901 Early marriages were the norm in Germany for hundreds of years. You are not German and likely cannot speak German so I'll sum it up for you: Woman in late teens, man in early twenties. Five year gap on average, this is why women retire five years before men (so married couples retire at roughly the same time)
(201.73 KB 582x527 age of consent pepe.png)
(102.28 KB 398x1932 age of consent history.jpeg)
>>6900 >>6903 13, 14 year old girls are not children. You are an oversocialized feminist. The age of consent in Germany was 14 in 1880 and it is 14 today. It was 13 in France in 1880, 12 in Spain. All around the world until feminists began to campaign for much higher ages (in order to 'liberate' women and to destroy the family structure) it was clustered around 12-14. This is when women should be married and by age 15 or 16 they should be giving birth to their first children, just like Nature / God intended it. >>6902 Why is literally everyone from Cesar's blog such a weirdo? I know we have one regular poster from there and he seems fine but the ones that come in straight from the blog are unbearable faggots
>>6902 Who the fuck is Cesar? >>6889 This sounds about right, suddenly the board quality took a fucking nosedive. I've been posting in the Race War thread for weeks since I'm intensely knowledgeable on guerilla warfare against an industralised modern nation, yet suddenly I get banned when Jap-posters show up and start saying stupid shit.
>>6905 Look at you acting like you're some ebin /fascist/ oldfag
>>6904 >Why is literally everyone from Cesar's blog such a weirdo? I'm not "from" there I suppose but I've lurked for years and there's lots of good commenters, but Cesar himself while being perfectly anti-Christian and pro-NatSoc/Pagan, upholds the official ZOG story on modern jewish tricks like 9/11 etc and bans accordingly. So you end up with a strange community response whenever modern happenings come up. >>6905 >start saying stupid shit You're the one holding contradictory positions within the same post and attacking people who agree with you, I suggest some time off.
>>6904 Yeah that's because we didn't have proper policing and we had local rulers who usually enforced cultural norms up until the mid-1800s. Paedophiles were considered sodomites and usually killed. Hanged in the civilised countries, stabbed with pitchforks in the more brutal lands like the HRE. I have no fucking idea why you're pretending to be a historian, but I will clue you in - these laws are written exclusively for nobility, as a political system, not as a legal or moral system. All records show that there are more child marriages, now, due to the introduction of third worlders to Western countries. The average age of marriage and sexual intercourse were considered the same, ceremonies and paperwork were rare and long-term relationships were assumed as marriages. That is, if you slept with a woman, you are now married to her and can't sleep with anybody else. Cheating on your new wife was considered about the same as it is now, and would lead to ostracisation at best and being stabbed to death by her family at worst. There is endless evidence for this - practically every national Church, including the Catholic Church, hold endless vaults of paperwork showing exactly this. Infact, in the past, people had sex later in life than they do now. You're nothing but a paedophile. Kill yourself or atleast fuck off.
>>6908 >still can't seperate hebe from pedo 5 posts in while listing off endless minutae with reddit spacing Okay new guess, you're the Polish equivalent of a Qboomer?
(6.13 MB 3064x3232 feminism white birthrates.png)
>>6908 >You're nothing but a paedophile Advocating for marriage to pubescent girls is not pedophilia, you hysterical femcunt. Nature's Laws are eternal and inviolable. Anyone who spurns them for their fake, artificial, anti-Nature 'laws' will be humbled in time, and met with destruction.
>>6909 I'm British. I am familiar with Poland and its history, as I am familiar with all of European history. I don't at all separate your paedophilic fantasies from one another. I know history very well. You on the other hand are a degenerate who wants to attach your perversions to European history. It's a naked attempt to cement your fantasies into a larger historical context to grant legitimacy to it, similar to how niggers make up shit about contributing to the European industrial revolution. >>6910 Again, five year gap, late teens to early twenties. This is historical fact in all of Europe. A uniquely European phenomenon and a core basis for European culture - women chose who to marry and men were under intense pressure to choose their wives carefully, since the second they put their cock inside, they were stuck with them for life and expected to provide for life. The age difference was, on average, five years. Even Romeo and Juliet was a commentary on the dangers of doing this too young, with both being far too young to accept the twin roles of marriage and militaristic politics. The figures are usually 18-23 or 19-24. In some area, the band was narrower, so 17-21 or 16-19. This is why many countries have laws specifically applying to this, each developed from their own specific local cultures. Natures laws are simple - people meet and engage in relationships in their late teens. We live by natures' laws to this day. Infact it is only recently that people stopped marrying their first girlfriends - this is what propaganda does, it teaches people that casual sex is more important than a stable relationship.
>>6911 You blab on and on about what people in the past did and try to smuggle this under our nose as the eternal Laws of Nature. It's not going to fly. You are demonstrating profound ignorant (and perhaps kikery) when you fail to make the basic distinction between nomos and physis, something which every /fascist/ should be profoundly familiar with. You are a newfag and you are shitting up /pol/ right now as we speak, so I can conclude that you are indeed a shill.
>>6911 To oversimplify - there are plenty of Europeans to go around. We do not have a problem of too few Whites. We have a problem of too many of everybody else. A hundred years ago, White Europeans made up a third of the world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Europe The population of ethnic Europeans is stable at around the level it was in 1913 provided there are no major disasters which destroy agriculture - possibly more as Russia modernises and puts its land to better use. This is not due to propaganda - this is an easily observable cycle which has been going on for hundreds of years in some places. It is a natural process. Most animals adopt this, as population density increases, fertility rate decreases. This has been artificially strengthened by propaganda. This is most significant in certain birds like those in New Zealand, which adopted a slow reproductive cycle to make better use of its local resources. The problem is that somebody forgot to tell the niggers this, who have exploded in population massively and continue to do so at such a rate that all-out-war is guaranteed within the next fifty years. War is a perfect 10, it will happen, one way or another. There is no saving grace - anything which isn't putting you into a better position to hold ground against an enemy of incomprehensible size is wasted effort.
>>6912 It IS the "Law of Nature" unless you're implying we should adopt a dysgenic approach to reproduction. Why are you quoting Greek philosophy like it's somehow relevant to anything? Laws of nature don't exist, we are animals with highly developed social systems. Pseudo-religious philosophy is a waste of time. Let's talk hard reality - black Africans have a population which is doubling every 25 years and showing no signs of slowing down. How does Greek philosophy allow you to handle this problem?
>>6914 Don't think I don't see your IP-hopping, faggot >Laws of nature don't exist > Pseudo-religious philosophy is a waste of time. Now you're going full retard.
>>6914 >Law of Nature Let's explore this concept - scientific Laws are impossible to break by any known means. If they are broken, they are no longer a law - simple as. A Theory is a best-fit. This that you're speaking of is neither - it makes no sense. It sounds like you're referring to the "Nigger method" of simply beating and raping anything which you can until you accidentally produce children. There is no evidence at all that Europeans ever did this - infact White Europeans have so many aesthetic qualities that it is more likely that every single female ancestor you have actively chose the father of their children based off of these qualities. This is the closest thing to a "Law of Nature" - aesthetic-based reproduction, leading to paler skin, higher muscle mass, greater height, less body hair and a diverse set of eye colours and hair colours, thinner, softer hair, redder lips, larger chests, louder and deeper voices, bonier facial features, the list goes on. >>6915 IP Hopping is automatic. Laws of Nature do not exist in any sense - they come under a Theory because they are so easily broken.
>>6916 Are you really this much of a retarded materialist? Wow. Confusing scientific laws with the Laws of Nature? Embarrassing.
>>6917 A materialist? As opposed to what? I'm not arguing about wealth or greed, I'm arguing about actual survival. If you want to live in some fantasy land, you can get there early by tying a noose around your neck.
>>6918 So you don't even know the philosophical definition of materialism? Come on, buddy, this isn't 4chan, you're expected to know this shit.
>>6919 what the fuck? Why would I bother with any kind of philosophy? This seems like an intense waste of time for anybody to consider - why the fuck would anybody who considers themselves as intelligent try to scrape philosophy from a bunch of paedophiles?
(14.38 KB 192x255 laugh.jpg)
>>6920 >Why would I bother with any kind of philosophy? HAHAHAHAHAHA Holy shit. If you're not philosophizing, a bunch of Jews are philosophizing for you. Just go back to 4/pol/
>>6920 We have actual problems. These cannot be solved by trying to browbeat intelligent people with philosophical shit. It's obvious that you, >>6919, are an intensely stupid man who failed to understand any fruitful subject and now spend your time trying to push degenerate shit, because you failed to hold any relationships as a young adult. This explains your paedophilic fantasies, since anybody who had any relationships as a teenager would, sensibly, find teenagers repulsive and incapable of holding serious responsibilities. >>6921 See what I mean? I don't follow any philosophical route. It holds no interest for me. I simply cannot view philosophy as a subject worth my time, it is useless. Atleast something like microbiology can be weaponised, philosophy is just what idiots teach themselves to make them seem more intelligent. You haven't actually addressed any of my points - why bother with increasing White birthrates? There are enough Whites in the world for a stable population, and increasing our population would only stretch resources thinner. Why is this philosophy worth something to you? It seems entirely worthless to me, and infact, counterproductive.
(31.82 KB 500x396 pepe resisting laugh.jpg)
>>6922 Your points aren't worth addressing. You think you are beyond philosophy, but really you are operating according to some Jew-approved metaphysics of naturalism, atheism and materialism and it shows. So no, I will not drop the philosophy question. Just look at you going on about your kiked psychoanalysis as well now.
>>6923 Because I can see right through it. It's not even a good attempt. It's not even "psychoanalysis" - anybody who had any sizeable experience with teenage relationships would actively avoid relationships with teenagers. It is extremely rare that these relationships go well. It is this simple - like when a child touches a stove and gets burned. This is why you are ridiculed and most people are disgusted by you. You are not intelligent - you are, in fact, extremely stupid. A meth addict, to a chemist. Somebody who doesn't understand the material and, like many addicts, are arrogant in your opinion. This is a major problem to overcome for moderators in my opinion - your ideology will fall-flat on its face so long as you fail to comprehend basic reality. Some philosophy may be helpful to some people who hold strong delusions, but philosophy is not a task worth more than a brief glance. Material problems require material solutions, and you have no perspective on either - leading to the simple question, what use are you to anybody in any material sense? Your philosophy is shit and completely out-of-tune with reality, you hold no significant propaganda value, they are not financially significant, they are not scientifically significant, they are not militarily significant - what is their significance? It holds no value to the subject and you come across as a Cultist with an aim to convert people to some kind of scheme.
>>6924 > your ideology will fall-flat on its face so long as you fail to comprehend basic reality. Indeed, and you fail to grasp it.
>>6923 >>6921 >>6919 In fact - this is something worth its own thread imo, Cults. Social conditioning methods here: >The teachings are not wrong, but they can be wrongly interpreted See: >>6925 >>6919 >>6917 >>6915 >>6912 Obscure mentions of an unfamiliar subject and social objections to the presence of an alleged outsider: >>6912 "You are a newfag and you are shitting up /pol/ right now as we speak, so I can conclude that you are indeed a shill." I have never heard of your weird shit. It is likely worthless to me, like any of the other thousands of Cults. I'm sure you will attempt to say that Cults can be effective, like Shoko Asahara or Charles Manson, which is true - but they are a social phenomenon, and their teachings are only worth studying if you plan on being a cult leader of some sort. But as a philosophy itself, nope, absolute worthless shit. Take it into the real world if you must but don't shit up imageboards with your nonce filth.
This user was banned.
>>6905 >who is Cesar Isn't that a non-White blogger? Lol imagine hating yourself to the point where you worship White people
(148.44 KB 308x364 ClipboardImage.png)
>>6929 Yep, he's built his entire image online off of trying to 'help' White people win back our nations. It's funny to see his entire blog decorated with NatSoc imagery and pictures of Dr. Pierce when he's literally a Meximutt living in Mexico City. Pic related is him as a 15 year old kek
>>6907 Cesar has always seemed pretty anti-spiritual to me.
>>6930 I see it more as "modern Whites are pathetic for needing this non-White to tear down the Jewish poison pill that is Christianity (and the residual effect on secular Whites)". He was far ahead of /pol/ on this even back when /pol/ was good. There are comments on there from 2012 that mirror posts finally being made on imageboards today. >>6931 "Spiritual" is a meaningless word to me despite benefitting from a strange experience myself, so I guess that's a good thing? Surely you don't think he's materialist. Anyway this is a derail so I won't reply anymore, it was a case of mistaken schizoposter identity in the first place.
>>6933 I meant more in the sense that he doesn't seem very concerned with paganism. He is quite evidently concerned with the transition between the values of pre-Abrahamic Europe and Christian set of values today, but it doesn't go much beyond that from what I have read of him (not tons, admittedly). He's more right than not on some issues though, I have to admit. He directly identifies the problem of Christianity, and he points out that Christfaggotry in one form or another is dragging Whites to their deaths. That's at least commendable in itself. There are some testimonies on his blog from readers saying that some Christian Whites have woke up due to his work too, at the very least.
>>6898 Fuck off astroturf kike. This is common knowledge.
>>6929 >imagine hating yourself to the point where you worship White people It could be worse: https://www.bitchute.com/video/xXCSExxfvj2A/
>>6936 This disgusting video can’t even be dismissed as a single crazy church. Christianity inducing its followers to literally worship Israel is an international phenomenon. Recently in the Japan thread an anon >>6208 drew my attention to the Makuya in Japan, an entire group of Israel-worshiping Japanese people. It’s spiritual / mental malware
>>6937 I'm sure it's just a cohencidence.
>>6942 Of course, it’s all one big cohencidence
>>6819 Yes. However as of right now, hiding under free speech no longer works. Those old /b/tards everyone disregards were always 4-5 migrations ahead in terms of free speech on chans. Many on 8chan knew the site was done for years before the zonald attacked Syria starting that exodus.
>>6937 That is true but I was focusing on another take - I said White people not jews after all.
>>6935 No, you just keep saying it and despite being disproven, objectively, as Goebbles said, form into jelly and retreat only to return with no knowledge of the matter. Paedophiles must all be killed. I have no doubt about this - no matter their day-job, they're such lying filth that they need to be exterminated with maximum prejudice. It disgusts me when people say that you filth have served some kind of sentence - only an unmarked grave and a bad memory will deal with you.
>>6952 That's nice, tough guy, but you're the only one talking about pedos here. Yes, child molesters, child pornographers and Jews who molest children and suck the blood out of freshly circumcised penises should indeed be killed, but no one is talking about doing any of those things ITT. We're talking about re-adjusting the age of average marriage to be more in harmony with the Laws of Nature and the actual development of men and women. When someone has started puberty it's time to start finding them a suitable life partner. You can cry about this, but Nature only laughs at you in return.
>>6806 This has nothing to do with the fact that neucucks ... some christians. Quit calling it /fash/ faggot, not even the BO makes it sound that gay and he's one of the people you are bitching about. and so what? that there were some christains? They are the enemy, they are the race traitors Mason talked about, they hold the power structure and they are the ones who will pay for this state of affairs. >It has everything do with you low IQs, because OG /fash/ wasn't this annoying and spergy. It has nothing to do with neuchan, and everything to do with Deradicalizers like all christains. >Most Whites today are still christians, so you're not making point. I am making a point, you don't like that point because you are defending a race traitorous creed that must be destroyed. >Yes that's the entire point of why Jesus cried about them in the first place. Jesus didn't fucking exist, the entire story was made up psyop by the fucking jews for revenge against romes elites, the Nordic people >His entire revolt was against supposed "new jewry" that was a case of how Israelis truly became decadent. Nope he wasn't real, so being that Paul, Mark, and Gamaliel, are the authors of the story only one of which was a essene jew(they still followed and taught the talmud) like jesus is in the fiction of the bible. >The old jews beforehand were not a threat of the Aryan until the Greeks and Romans conquered most of West Asia and became world powers. This is not the case either there are several stories that give hints as to what they did in opposition to Aryans stretching quite far back even into Egypt which we know was ruled by Red Nordic Aryans, the enmity may stretch back even farther but neither side has any recorded history of it, mostly thanks to the jews machinations in creating and spreading christianity. >But the war against jews didn't began until Alexander It began before that the jews were already infiltrating several places in Greece when alexander unified it, his actions may have made it worse but it was already there. >LOL you're an idiot, I'm not christcuck. ... I never said you were, what you are is an atheist, and as such, a midwit. I addressed your entire argument on "Shitting on your ancestors" the truly CHRISTIAN, ones who wholeheartedly gave their devotion to YHWH, they DESERVE the shunning by US and the other Ancestors, but you fail to even look at it because you think yourself above concerns such as the spiritual, take your idiocy and go away.
>>6902 Which link? and if you are referring to Adunai, then he probably is .>>6904 It's not everyone from there, or even everyone who reads and contributes in both places least of all Cesar himself, who probably hasn't even looked at this place, he has a varied collection of people who comment on his blog ranging from the mad jewish dipshits out there like Adunai to people who agree with most of what he says, It's got nothing to do with his blog as far as I can tell. >>6931 He isn't, he is somewhat shallow on that front especially if you don't make the effort to read his book. if you do you see that he seeks to make the 14 words a religion in and of themselves, which him being Mexican is admirable, at least.
>>3362 NazBol is badass
>>8583 No, nazbol is kikery and for faggots.
>>8587 nope, pretty cool, all slavs should be nazbol
I don't see why people dislike NazBol. It seems like an updated version of NS with greater attention given to treasonous capitalists, something that was much needed with NS.
>>8912 Everything about the ‘Bolshevik’ part of it is the problem. Capitalism and communism are two sides of the same shekel. They both have the same sort of materialistic view of the world were humans are primarily consumers and producers. Everything is reduced to numbers, quantities and material goods. With communism it is even worse because heavily egalitarian ideas are mixed into the equation, along with those of class war, which is antithetical to the fascist / völkisch organic view of the nation. Communism, national or international, is basically technocratic enslavement of the populace too. Nothing that NazBol wants can’t be accomplished under NS. Hitler took the whip to capitalists, while using their industry for the revitalization and rearmament of Germany. With the case of Junkers, his aircraft manufacturing business was seized by the government when he refused to serve the interests of the German Volk. Most of the capitalist class would be liquidated today if fascists got control. They are race traitors, spiritual jews and rootless cosmopolitans.
>>8910 >all slavs should become nazbols So all slavs should become sodomites? >>8912 >I don't see why people dislike NazBol. It seems like an updated version of NS with greater attention given to treasonous capitalists, something that was much needed with NS. Nazbol was and still is a small movement filled with a bunch of gay jewish LARPers who go around worshipping Lenin, Stalin, and Mao as gods, three guys who failed to tackle capitalism and ended up making their states Judaic oligarchies. The NS brought justice to both the capitalists and communists who refused to obiedence to the state. What did or would nazbols do other than shill and spam forced memes that no one takes seriously?
>>8912 I'll never take seriously anything that has the word bolshevik and the hammer and sickle on it.
>>9331 Reactionaryism.
>>8940 >three guys who failed to tackle capitalism and ended up making their states Judaic oligarchies. idk about Lenin, but Stalin purged most of the powerful jews and China is not jewish to this day. >What did or would nazbols do other than shill and spam forced memes that no one takes seriously? According to them, slaughter all capitalists, communists, and jews. Not sparing the "obedient ones," but all of them. >>8922 >Nothing that NazBol wants can’t be accomplished under NS. That makes it seem like, as I said, an updated version of NS. >Most of the capitalist class would be liquidated today if fascists got control. They are race traitors, spiritual jews and rootless cosmopolitans. That sounds like things NazBols say.
(120.46 KB 480x563 laughing marx.jpg)
>>9365 >That sounds like things NazBols say. No, it's not. Because unlike NazBols, I'm not operating on a worldview where these people should be liquidated just because of some class role that they they have. They need to be, by and large, liquidated because they are major race-traitors who have been complicit in White Genocide, who have shipped jobs here in America overseas to Mexicans and Chinks, who have directly sided with Cultural Marxists over the nation and race, and who are the main destroyers of this planet's environment. To say this is 'NazBol' is just insane, especially when we can find all sorts of super extreme monarchists / Japanese ultranationalists saying basically the exact same things about capitalism, class, individualism and modernity during the Taisho and Showa eras. I have nothing against private property per se, nor do I want to abolish classes, or incite a class war or institute anything that has to do with (((Bolshevism))). States like the USSR that killed millions of innocent farmers in places like Ukraine and all throughout Russia, and who worked tirelessly to dissolve the culture of the Russian people, and which was a state that was founded on Marxism by a pack of Jews deserve no sympathy.
>>9364 Both the word bolshevik and the hammer and sickle are jewish symbols. I don't want anything to do with jews.
>>9365 You still haven't given up kike?
>>9366 >a worldview where these people should be liquidated just because of some class role that they they have but because they are major race-traitors who have been complicit in White Genocide One and the same. >>9371 Fair enough. (((>>9372))) Hello moshie. Retard.
>>9373 Hey (((You))) fuck off back to cuckchan and go shill your garbage somewhere else. Also >I-i'm not nazbol also >That makes it seem like, as I said, an updated version of NS. You have no right calling anyone retarded buddy. Get reported kike. Your head will be on a stake soon enough.
>>9373 If some capitalist throws his weight totally behind helping NS and the White race, I have no problem with him. Marxist slave morality has no place in White Nationalism.
(((>>9375))) >shills for israel >lies like a kike >accuses actual White nationalists of being jews Insanity >>9378 >If some capitalist throws his weight totally behind helping NS and the White race, And which one would do that? Bill Gates? Greg Penner? Jeff Bezos? Literally every single capitalist is totally and enthusiastically pursuing a policy of genocide against us.
>>9382 It doesn't matter if I can't name one, I was speaking hypothetically. Your egalitarian NazBol project is Jewish to the core and is based solely on the intellectual fruits of Jews. Egalitarianism, class struggle and Bolshevism are anti-White.
>>9382 >>shills for Israel You even lie like a kike. Too much cuckchan has rotten your brain. >accuses actual White nationalists of being jews <White nationalists downplay NS and shill for Judaic bullcrap >And which one would do that? >Bill Gates? Greg Penner? Jeff Bezos? Amazing how one man can prove himself to be a retard and a shill. None of these men are White. We had guys like Henry Ford. We have rich Whites who have shown to be worried about the upcoming status of Whites in America. The issue here has always been the ultra-rich jews and zionists. How does one call all politics racial, but downplay and accuse White capitalists to our enemy? Rich Whites can and are being redpilled. Anyone dedicated to mainstream medias are 90% likely to be kiked. You're literally validating Marx's retarded theory on class-struggle which was a lie and trying to make it racial. Fuck off and die.
>>9384 >It doesn't matter if I can't name one, I was speaking hypothetically. If your hypothetical is pure fantasy, then it is irrelevant as an example. Do you also bring up the hypothetical good jew or good nigger as well? (((>>9387))) >Accuses me of what he is doing That is jewish. You lie and argue like a kike. Therefore, I am 100% justified in calling you a kike.
>>9390 The hypothetical isn't pure fantasy, we don't know who would show themselves as being pro-White if the time came. Even the capitalists of the Third Reich knelt to Hitler in time. The other anon just gave the example of Henry Ford. I will say it again - class struggle is Jewish, as is Bolshevism, as is egalitarianism, as is materialism, and as is all sorts of Jewish utopianism and economic determinism. NazBols get the bullet.
>>9390 >You lie and argue like a kike. But where have a lied or argued like a kike? You lied about Stalin kicking out jews, where is my lie?
>>9391 >we don't know who would show themselves as being pro-White if the time came Are you telling me that you would trust an opportunistic traitor who suddenly became "pro-White" only when it was profitable to do so? These subhumans have gleefully collaborated to exterminate their own race because it was profitable to do so. They have forfeited their right to live. They are pure evil. They are literally worse than jews because at least jews have the excuse that they are ethnocentric non-Whites doing it for their own racial interest. What is Bill Gate's excuse? >Even the capitalists of the Third Reich knelt to Hitler in time And betrayed him the instant it was profitable. >the example of Henry Ford. Obviously, I like Henry Ford. But he shut up about the jews after WW2. He could have funded opposition to the war or American counter-semites. But all he did was distribute counter-semitic literature. Which is a good deed, to be sure. But we are doing that already despite us not being multi-millionaires (billionaires). So frankly, what he did was not that impressive. Hero-worshiping Ford is like hero-worshipping Trump because he called out the lying media. Yes, calling out the media is a good thing. What Trump did was good. But he was the president of the United States for 4 years and did almost nothing to actually hinder or stop them. Why do you have such low expectations for the richest and most powerful men of our race? >>9395 You falsely accuse me of being jewish with no evidence. That is the lie.
>>9482 >Hero-worshiping Ford is like hero-worshipping Trump because he called out the lying media. Yes, calling out the media is a good thing. What Trump did was good. But he was the president of the United States for 4 years and did almost nothing to actually hinder or stop them. What are even the grounds for comparing Ford and Trump? They are completely different. Ford distributing counter-Semitic literature and information through his newspaper and other means did far more than that fat crypto-kike Trump ever did. He was kosher from day one, married off his own kids to Jews, hung out with pedophiles like Epstein, and single-handedly swindled large swathes of White America by dropping rhetoric that could mean that he was 'based', but in reality was just bait to attract and consolidate an undeserved personality cult around himself. Even at this very moment the Trump cult isn't dead, even after his failed presidency where not one thing of value was accomplished and he flip-flopped on literally every thing he ever did. Millions of White Americans are still 'trusting the plan' and treating this fat kike like a messiah. Trump = (((Trumpeldor)))
>>9484 >Ford distributing counter-Semitic literature and information through his newspaper and other means did far more than that fat crypto-kike Trump ever did. Obviously. But as I said, Ford was what today would be a multi-billionaire. He had power and influence the likes of which all of 16chan combined cannot even compare with. And what did he do to defend his people? Exactly what we do; Distribute counter-semitic literature. The comparison is the fact that that you appear to be doing to Ford what the so called "White nationalist" Trump fans do. The Trump fans will say something like >Sure, Trump never called out the jews on TV, how could he? That'd be bad optics! But he called out the jewish media and got a bajillion Americans to oppose the media. Isn't that based? As I said, yes, it is good to call out the lying media. Yes, it is good to distribute counter-semitic literature. But when you are talking about men of such indescribable power and influence, I expect a tad more than lip-service to the cause of White survival. I asked you before; Why do you hold the rich to such low standards? Shouldn't you be holding them to higher standards since they have tens of thousands of times more wealth and influence than you?
>>9482 >You falsely accuse me of being jewish with no evidence. That is the lie. You give us one example, but in reality you argue like a jew and shilled a thread like jews would. Since you have no true answer, it seems to me that you're admitting that you are indeed lying and pull things out of your own ass as you type out each post. >He could have funded opposition to the war or American counter-semites. No, he would of gotten shoah'd and this obvious. America forced or convinced all major industries to devote their resources into WW2 thanks to their fear-mongering. If he refused, then American agents would of either assassinated him or worse made Ford out to be public enemy number one. >And betrayed him the instant it was profitable. No they didn't. The first traitors were the priests, reactionaries, and crypto-Marxists. The capitalists were put on a leash or were hand-picked by the NSDAP who were loyal to their cause. You're acting as if socialists have never betrayed others for their own mutual benefits either. >Hero-worshiping Ford is like hero-worshipping Trump because he called out the lying media. No one hero-worshipped anyone. Ford was admired, not worshipped as a hero. He was one of the few successful capitalists who was willing to stand against the jews and their control of the West's industries and helped Hitler for free to rid of the kikes. You are one unique idiot you know? The stuff you post is always nothing, but ignorance and lies, but hey you swear up and down that you aren't a rabbi at all.
(85.33 KB 1000x700 yikes pepe.jpg)
>>9485 >But as I said, Ford was what today would be a multi-billionaire. He had power and influence the likes of which all of 16chan combined cannot even compare with. And what did he do to defend his people? Exactly what we do; Distribute counter-semitic literature. This is just stupid. Yes, a man in the 1920s (literally a hundred years ago before television and the Internet) was redpilling people through newspapers and books that he got published. This is the equivalent today of owning a news channel and releasing 24/7 redpilling content on mainstream media. Ford's newspaper alone was second only to the New York Daily News. You would have to be retarded to think that a man in Ford's position today would just be distributing newspapers and books. That is easy today for anyone to do.
>>9485 Not to intrude on your disc but rich people are cowards, in other words not revolutionaries and I've yet to see anything that points to the contrary. What will it take to get the rich off the conservacuck-scam wagon? I hate having to compare to jew, but where is the soros of the good side? I talk with some of these people on the regular, they hate nonWhites and most of what's going on as much as I do, and if they can't do anything why don't they support the ones that can.
>>9485 >But as I said, Ford was what today would be a multi-billionaire. He had power and influence the likes of which all of 16chan combined cannot even compare with. Holy blue-pilled post! Do you think that every billonaire was in power in 20th century America? Billonaires are nothing compared to what the zionists had over Weimerica. You claimed to be a White revolutionaries, but never mention the work of the jew, funny. > And what did he do to defend his people? Exactly what we do; Distribute counter-semitic literature. What should of have he done, sperg out and threaten to shut down his company only for the jew to take over and run everything themselves? He did everything he could to fight them and it simply wasn't enough. You're expecting too much out of him and think he should of been successful out his actions simply because he was rich, despite the fact that being rich didn't mean shit in America because everything was control by the zionist and banks in the first place. Try looking into reality and the circumstances of America and learn why it was impossible to be a fascist or against jews without getting your actions countered, cancel cultured or getting assassinated. >But when you are talking about men of such indescribable power and influence, I expect a tad more than lip-service to the cause of White survival. >I asked you before; Why do you hold the rich to such low standards? Shouldn't you be holding them to higher standards since they have tens of thousands of times more wealth and influence than you? LOL! How would Trump be able to succeed to call out and fight the kikes? Firstly, Trump is part jew and is a zionist himself. Secondly, even if he called out the jews for their subversions it would only result in his death, which would give victory to the shitlibs and soycalists who hated him. Trump is a jew and a coward, expecting him to do anything is like expecting JFK to simply not get shot for declaring war against those actual run the United States, because " he had enough money therefore he had all the resources in the world to stop his assassination". Things aren't so simple, you have to understand your surroundings and situations at hand before making life-factoring decisions. It's better to rely and have high-expectations out of brave low-background revolutionaries that no one knows about than weaklings and normalcattle.
>>9485 >But as I said, Ford was what today would be a multi-billionaire. He had power and influence the likes of which all of 16chan combined cannot even compare with No he didn't, Ford was a business man who ran a big car industry in Detroit and boomed Michigan economy to being one of the richest states in 20th century America. His power compared to what Eisenhower, American politicians, and the bankers had was miniscule. What exactly could Ford had done to fight off the Zionists, when he only knows how to obtain capital and run a company? >But when you are talking about men of such indescribable power and influence, I expect a tad more than lip-service to the cause of White survival. But Ford didn't have that at all he was popular, sure, but he didn't have enough power to change the entire United States to counter Semitic influences. The best of what he has done was fund and helped the NSDAP and start his own newspaper business The Dearborn Independent, to inform Americans about how the banks control their homes, shops, corporations, etc. Ford literally did everything in his power to defeat Zion compared to Trump's action which have been little to nothing at all, but you can't expect much out of him, because he's a controlled opposition anyway. How are you a National Socialist and do not acknowledge this for it is basic education. >>9487 Anon simply just hates capitalists. He detests them so much that he blames even the White capitalists who were as redpilled as we are as the reason why the jews subverted the United States to argue and conclude that all capitalists are bad. The entire point of fascism isn't to divide rich Whites with the poor, or the socialists with the capitalist, but to unite them under a single banner to resolve all conflicts or struggles that are tormenting the White race. Fascist seek to eliminate the purpose of purpose capitalism and socialist as mere ideology. If a capitalist is disloyal he will be liquidated, arrested and executed, period. The solution isn't to rid of all them simply for being rich, otherwise we would be no different than the Soviet Union's irresponsible actions. We are to capture the hearts and minds of all classes for a better nation and put those who are strong, wise and pure in charge for a golden future. What you're suggesting is something very Judaic.
(74.97 KB 627x429 jew elephant.jpg)
>>9493 Yup, you pretty much sum up why NazBols are subversives. They completely fail to grasp the doctrine of Fascism, and thus find themselves outside of the fold of Fascism. They have more in common with Marxists, Jews and envious subhumans tricked by the formerly mentioned groups than they do Fascists or other great men or philosophies of the past. If one does not accept the idea of a Volksgemeinschaft, i.e. of the organic nation-state, they are useful idiots for the Jews at the best, or outright subversives at worst. I myself detest capitalism and recognize that it is a harmful economic system, but the problem is not ultimately the system. The Jews always point to nebulous classes and groups to divert attention from themselves
>>9493 >His power compared to what Eisenhower, American politicians, and the bankers had was miniscule That is idiotic. He was one of the richest men in the world. >What exactly could Ford had done to fight off the Zionists, when he only knows how to obtain capital and run a company? Fund genuine White movements. >Ford literally did everything in his power to defeat Zion Bullshit. If you were a billionaire, what would you have done? If all you can imagine doing is handing out leaflets, you lack imagination. >>9490 >Billonaires are nothing compared to what the zionists had over Weimerica. You claimed to be a White revolutionaries, but never mention the work of the jew, funny. Clearly you do not understand where power comes from. Power in a democracy is a product of influence and control over information. >What should of have he done, sperg out and threaten to shut down his company only for the jew to take over and run everything themselves? See above. If you were a billionaire and you would not bankrupt yourself in defense of your race, then you are not a revolutionary or a White nationalist at all but a traitor and a materialist. >>9488 is correct. The rich are cowards and traitors. Every single one of them have betrayed their race and either remained silent in the face of White genocide or wholly gone over to the jews. They have virtually infinite money and we are poor. All men like Pierce and GLR needed was enough funding to conduct the kind of political theater that jew politicians do but even the most charismatic of our Greats were chronically short of cash. Where is the Soros of Whites? We have no Soros. Not even a single White billionaire will lift a finger to help us. Instead, virtually all of them have joined hands with the jew to destroy us. Why? Why do they do this? Because they are nothing more than materialist moneygrubbers. They are effectively jews.
(188.64 KB 768x768 gay corporate logos.jpg)
>>9493 >The entire point of fascism isn't to divide rich Whites with the poor, or the socialists with the capitalist, but to unite them under a single banner to resolve all conflicts or struggles that are tormenting the White race. This is as idiotic as civic nationalists who want to unite with blacks against jews. The rich have made it 100% clear that they hate us and want us to die. And you want to suck their cocks and pray that they help us? Why the fuck would they do that? They hate us. They have wholly aligned with the forces of globo-homo. They are the forces of globo-homo.
>>9549 I think you just don't understand Fascism. Fascism has always been opposed to class warfare and the leveling of the social order. Capitalists and the heads of corporations have by and large exposed themselves as traitors. This is uncontroversial. There will have to be trials and executions for almost all of these people for what they have done, but not for what they are (rich). In a sense capitalism will be irrevocably BTFO when Fascism takes control again, because the system they are perpetuating is simply unsustainable, anti-human, anti-White, anti-Nature and anti-nation. This type of person (i.e. businessmen in general) has a role in society, but it should not be a lauded one like it is today, and they ought to be firmly subordinated to the rule of the state. Profit cannot dictate the course of our nations and whether we care for the planet or not. I think there is less of a divide than we think here between you and the other anons, I don't think we should identify in any way with kosher terms like Bolshevism and all that implies though.
>>9549 >This is as idiotic as civic nationalists who want to unite with blacks against jews. This isn't even close to being the same to civic national you retard. The capitalists today are jews and the ones who worked against Whites have always been jews you utter imbecile. Fuck off to /pol/ and stop coming here with your low IQ nonsense. Fascism is about uniting a common face no matter their background. To conclude that this is liberal nationalism is a reach and just proof that you're a mongoloid who enjoys shilling and exposing himself as a utter moron who knows nothing about White survival and nationalism.
>>9551 He's a nazbol shill from cuckchan. Just report him, he isn't here to argue honestly.
>>9549 Civic nationalism is about protect America with no sense of "color". As in >I don't care where you come from as long as your allegiance is to America Some ethnonationalists consider having anybody of any ethnic origin to oppose jewish interests. But whether said ethninationalists have an ulterior motive for such non-Whites is something I don't know of. >>9551 >always been opposed to class warfare and the leveling of the social order. >caste system I am confused, can you elaborate?
>>9555 >protect protecting >ethninationalists ethnonationalists
>>9555 The Fascist conception of the state is based on organic theories of the state, i.e. where the state is viewed as very similar to biological organisms in its functioning, composed of many interdependent parts working more or less harmoniously as a greater unity. This theory has a long history. Aristotle used it as the basis of this theories in his Politics, the origin of the four classes in Vedic society are based on a legend about them emerging from different parts of the body of a 'cosmic man' and Hegel was also known to refer to the nation-state as an organism. The state to him was not just a machine or dead mechanism, but was akin to organism bound together by a communitarian glue that bound differentiated elements together, subordinates their interests to the whole and provided them with a shared overarching purpose. Right now we exist in a degenerate state of differentiation-without-unity. We are atomized, individualistic, hedonistic, self-serving, etc. The Fascist state in its ideal form embodies unity-in-difference—this is not meant in a cucked civnat sense, but in the sense of what we see in biological organisms. There are diverse types of cells, tissues and organs within the human body, and they are all interdependent, subordinated to the organic unity of the whole and each fulfill their own specific role. This is a division of labor. Division of labor is the basis of class differences, and the same sort of things exist in human societies at complex levels of development. Different people do different kinds of work (ideally best suited to their natures), some people lead, others people follow, some people care for domestic concerns, others for public concerns. If all of this is integrated harmoniously together, we have a healthy society.
>>9548 >That is idiotic. He was one of the richest men in the world I see that you enjoy producing zero arguments as well. Did you not read what anon said? Being rich = power is an illusion compared to what the Zionist and banks had, because they held all the political power and influences since the Great Depression i.e which is how they eliminated a-lot of rich Whites. Being rich compared to owning the entire legislation and sentate is comparing a rock to a boulder. >Fund genuine White movements. >The NSDAP wasn't genuine Seems to me that you are the one being idiotic here. >Bullshit. If you were a billionaire, what would you have done? Inform, radicalize and help White Americans against semitic toxicities. These are all these things Ford did and yet you're claiming that it wasn't enough. Hmmm, I think you just hate the rich, even when they are on our side. >Clearly you do not understand where power comes from. Power in a democracy is a product of influence and control over information. Clearly you have no understanding of history and how the majority of the American congress back in the 1940s were zionists who usupered power by jailing and assassinating anyone who dared question and oppose Zion. The fact that you think American democracy is saying a-lot about ((((You))) right now. >If you were a billionaire and you would not bankrupt yourself in defense of your race, You're not making any points, the billionaires beforehand weren't even White and the ones who tried to save White America failed, because in the end, those who worked for the jew were the only ones in power. Look at all America's top industries and rich and you will either see semite or MIGA advocate. >This is as idiotic as civic nationalists who want to unite with blacks against jews Civic nationalism is about uniting all races, not classes. Fascism is far from civic, because it centers on enstreghtening and eliminating class warfare among kin. There's no corrleation at all that this even remotely similar to ethnicnationalism/National Socialism at all. You're either an Ashkennazi or a blue-piller. >The rich have made it 100% clear that they hate us and want us to die. Ah I see, you're a jew who wants class warfare. It's time to head back /pol/, we don't want your kind here if you aren't going to be a true White revolutionary. Btw it wasn't the rich that fucked over White America it was the Middle-class jews.
>>9555 >Some ethnonationalists consider having anybody of any ethnic origin to oppose jewish interests Then they are not ethnonationalists, they are civic nationalists. Anyone who thinks that any race can become ethnic of nation does not understand the meaning of ethnicity in its organic meaning.
>>9563 Civic nationalism itself, needless to say, is a complete oxymoron. I almost wish there was another catchy term for them.
>>9567 >Civic nationalism itself, needless to say, is a complete oxymoron. True, I've never seen the idea work out anywhere in history or in the world. Funny enough not even the classic liberals acknowledge the idea of allowing other races to become citizens and be regarded as part of the ethnos of a nation. It seems to only be jews and their ideological slaves to want to unite all races as one. > I almost wish there was another catchy term for them. I usually just call them cucks,.liberals, zionists, or Amerimutts.
>>9563 Then how do other races come into play in the idea of ethnonationalism?
>>9573 Ethnonationalism is a position adopted by an ethnic group that involves conducting the affairs of state with the concerns of the nation / ethnic group held closely in mind at all times. The nation will be based on their preservation, sovereignty, health and well-being. This comes first. How other races come into play is more of an ethical question that you'll probably get a lot of answers on. To simply things and adopt more of a realpolitik perspective, some other nations will be allies, some enemies. But even the allies aren't people who we would invite to live in our country perpetually, nor should we expect them to allow us to settle in their own lands. In accordance with the goals and purpose of the state mentioned above, other races would not be allowed to live or miscegenate with the native population of the nation. This is fundamental. Some LARPers will say 'hurr kill them' but in a realistic sense this will never happen. That's not to say that illegal immigrants would be expelled with force or that those trying to cross the border wouldn't be shot at or anything
>>9555 >Some ethnonationalists consider having anybody of any ethnic origin to oppose jewish interests. They are fools nonetheless. Blacks will never shed blood to help Whites. They hate us. Just like capitalist traitors. >>9551 >In a sense capitalism will be irrevocably BTFO when Fascism takes control again, because the system they are perpetuating is simply unsustainable, anti-human, anti-White, anti-Nature and anti-nation. That is why I denounce capitalism. >>9554 >refuses to argue honestly OY VEH SHUT IT DOWN!!!! DON'T LET THE GOYIM KNOW!!! >has the Czutspah to accuse me of what you yourself are doing. Jews are astounding.
>>>9573 Anyone who are in our homeland and do not share our blood are to be eliminated or simply kicked out forever. Anyone says otherwise is a jew period. >>9574 >realpoltik Realpolitik is a meme and doesn't matter. Confirmed you're the same shil. >LARPers will say 'hurr kill them' but in a realistic sense this will never happen. You know you seem to have a talent for saying stupider things for ever post you make. Yes hurr we should kill them, because that's an easier and much more valid solution. Tired of you losers coming here telling us actual Whites what we should and should not do. >>9576 Nice samefag.
>>9552 > The capitalists today are jews and the ones who worked against Whites have always been jews you utter imbecile. Then by your own retarded definition, you are both a jew and a Nazbol. >Fascism is about uniting a common face no matter their background. Civic nationalist cuckoldry. You dishonestly accuse me of judaism whilst you yourself promote (((liberalism))) (((multi-racialism))) and (((civic nationalism))) >>9558 >>The NSDAP wasn't genuine wft? Why do you lie like that? >These are all these things Ford did and yet you're claiming that it wasn't enough. How much of his extraordinary wealth did he spend "radicalizing" (informing) Americans? >I think you just hate the rich No shit. I hate jews and shitlibs too. It is their behavior which causes hate. >even when they are on our side. Name one. Name a single rich gentile on our side. >the billionaires beforehand weren't even White and the ones who tried to save White America failed Why did they fail if capitalists are so based? Seems like everyone apart from Ford was a jew worshiper, even according to your pro-liberal/capitalist version of history. You accuse me of being a kike like you yet you yourself defend jewish ideals. You accuse me of being bluepilled while you yourself are bluepilled. Anyone defending liberalism is either a kike or a civ cuckold. Which one are you?
>>9578 >Realpolitik is a meme and doesn't matter Truly an astounding rebuttal. Good luck doing anything political when you can't even acknowledge the fact that there are multiple actors at play and that in some ways we are constrained in how we act on the political stage. And then you even conflate me for who knows what reason with this NazBol nigger I've been arguing against in this thread for days. Wew. "JUST KILL THEM ALL" is 4/pol/-tier politics. It sounds fun to say, and sounds like an easy solution, but things aren't that simple. Please come back when you are 18.
>>9579 >>Fascism is about uniting a common face no matter their background. <Civic nationalist cuckoldry. He doesn't mean 'background' in that sense, you absolute retard. >You dishonestly accuse me of judaism You promote COMMUNISM, which is an outgrowth of (((liberalism))), Judaism and Abrahamism in general. Tu quoque fallacy (and a spurious one at that)
>>9576 >They are fools nonetheless. Blacks will never shed blood to help Whites. They hate us. Just like capitalist traitors. Who are the capitalist traitors? Do you mean Mark Zuckerberg? A jew. Bill Gates? Also a jew. There are no capitalist traitors, because the rich capitalists who worked against us have always been jews. >That is why I denounce capitalism. You denounce being White and rich, not capitalism. >>refuses to argue honestly You literally are doing this and are just a burden here. You are constantly shilling literal nonsense and aren't here to say anything intelligent other than being typical /pol/ack jew. You act like a subversive you get banned like a subversive. This is no different than how Hitler btfo'd Strasser and his philosemitic ideology. >Jews are astounding. Of course you would say this. You all find yourself to be a master race, despite being masters of nothing. >>9579 >Then by your own retarded definition, you are both a jew and a Nazbol. <Hehe I'll use your own terms against you Literally doing what typical /pol/acks shills do. >Civic nationalist cuckoldry. <uniting all White people together to fight against jews is civic nationalism I'm not talking about background in the sense that all races should be united, which is obvious. You're reaching for straws once again. >You dishonestly accuse me of judaism whilst you yourself promote (((liberalism))) (((multi-racialism))) and (((civic nationalism))) Nigger, no one has done this, at this point you're just a bad troll. You are Judaic, you can't even argue why you aren't jewish lol and why we're wrong. >wft? Why do you lie like that? You literally said that he didn't fund genuine White movements, despite the fact he did and it was the NSDAP. >How much of his extraordinary wealth did he spend "radicalizing" (informing) Americans? He spent more than million dollars transporting newspaper across America to inform people about the jews and their control of the economy. What have you done compared to him, lie and sperg out on an imageboard? Please you're nothing compared to Hitler or Ford, because they were actual revolutionaries. Talk smack when you've actually accomplished something. >No shit. I hate jews and shitlibs too. It is their behavior which causes hate. No you love jews and their lies, which is why you argue like one and hate rich Whites and act as if they are the problem with everything. Then you are making attempts to paint Ford as a bad guy. You are a kike, deny it all you want. >Name one. Name a single rich gentile on our side. Ford, Disney, I.G. Farben, Krupp, Siemens >Why did they fail if capitalists are so based? At this point we're just repeating ourselves and you do not like to accept facts. You only desire attention, so consider this your last (((You))). >>9581 >Truly an astounding rebuttal. Good luck doing anything political when you can't even acknowledge the fact that there are multiple actors at play and that in some ways we are constrained in how we act on the political stage. LOL, there are no political actors that we have to consider, because all le "actors" hate us and want to eliminate us anyway. Organism and animals know that it's upmost logical to eliminate parasites who do not belong and you're asking for optics-cucking. You're either with us from the beginning, aka are a honorary Aryan or against us. >And then you even conflate me for who knows what reason with this NazBol nigger I've been arguing against in this thread for days. Wew. The nazbol nigger was spewing stupid shit about realpolitik just a week ago, and here you are doing the same stupid thing. Maybe you are him or not, but either way you're both incredibly stupid and love to take "ism" to heart and other political illusions that never really existed. I haven't seen anyone with a high IQ regard that realpolitik as something necessary. >"JUST KILL THEM ALL" is 4/pol/-tier politics. Who would of knew that a broken clock can be right once in a while? Anyway I'm not saying to kill all non-Whites, I'm saying that we must kill all invaders into our lands. This is indeed a solution, if you say otherwise then you have confirmed that you are a brownie in our lands and do not want to be exterminated.
>>9583 >you're asking for optics-cucking To be against optics-cucking has never meant to act like a total retard without regards for the consequences of actions. There is smart maneuvering and then there is optics-cucking. The two are very different. The latter entails a kosherization of the content of the ideology. This is definitely something that has to be strongly rejected. We are definitely going to have to kill a lot of people, but it's really not that simple. We'll kill them quietly, some of them we will deport and dump over the border, etc. When it comes to Jews, they will die. All Jews have to die. This should just be a given at this point. >The nazbol nigger was spewing stupid shit about realpolitik just a week ago, and here you are doing the same stupid thing Well he doesn't have ownership of the word itself, obviously. I would hope that what I am saying is at least somewhat smarter than teaming up with literal globohomo socialist states like he suggested. >Anyway I'm not saying to kill all non-Whites, I'm saying that we must kill all invaders into our lands. We essentially agree then.
>>9582 >You promote COMMUNISM You are so ideologically confused that you call White racial survival communism. Exactly as cuckservatives do. Some people think that sucking the cock of anti-White billionaires is the path to survival. Others reject this kind of cuckoldry and say kill them all. However, both sides of this debate at least have the greater goal of White survival at heart. But only the most judaized cuckold calls it communism. >>9583 >Bill Gates? Also a jew. You and I both know that Gates is not a jew. Just because you dislike someone doesn't make them a jew. By that logic, I should just accuse every collaborator of being a jew. >u iz a jew No, you are the jew That was easy. Any retard can make false accusations. It's easy to do. Tougher is to make consistent arguments. You need to be White to do that. You refuse to engage honestly, as a jew does. You make false accusations and accuse me of doing what you do. And as a jew does, you seek to ban every true position out of fear.
>>9594 If you support NazBol you are supporting communism. It's that simple. I don't know what is so hard to understand. You have not denied any of the accusations that have been raised against you about leveling the social order, egalitarianism, abolishing private property, etc. That is what NazBol is.
(35.42 KB 229x378 Bill in his youth.jpg)
(620.21 KB 879x1160 Bill Gates.jpg)
>>9594 >You and I both know that Gates is not a jew If Bill Gates was exposed to be a jew, then it would reveal that the jews rule the world. Gates looks nothing like a White guy from his youth and today. Remember that this is the same guy who supports Israel and has done nothing, but hung around and worked with fellow jews. Just because (((Wikipedia))) has no mention of someone being jewish doesn't mean they aren't one. His rival and best friend Steve Jobs was a jew as well. Amazing, all you've done here is post lies and dare call anyone jewish. > By that logic, I should just accuse every collaborator of being a jew. Except his logic is firm and true. You're so stupid and I don't know how it is you came here, but you're a parasite. Almost every rich (((billionaire))) has done nothing, but support Israel, communicate exclusively with powerful jews, and validated all of their lies. You're trying to pin everything on the rich like a communist, despite the fact that every rich person who has fought against the White race and help Zion enslave humanity has been a jew. Anons here have given you numerous reasons why it is dumb to pin the blame on the rich Whites and explain your faulty logic and lies, and yet you persist in making things up and making one-liners, because you have no arguments other than lying. Give it up. No believes, just stay on /pol/.
(1.66 MB 1134x595 ClipboardImage.png)
>>9610 Worth pointing out that Bill Gates' father looks himself like a massive kike - just see his hooked nose, his massive kike ears and Jewish lips. Bill in his youth has Jew lips too
>>3362 >Why is the national bolshevism isnt as legit movement nowdays.... In the 18th century Europe you had the original Liberals and their various offshoots like Socialism, Communism, Capitalism, Republicanism and Anarchism etc. On the other side you had the original Conservatives and their various offshoots like Monarchism, Restorationism, Christianity and Traditionalism etc. These two groups used to be violently opposed to each other most of the time, because they had opposing worldviews and moral systems that were completely different from another. They fought over which path the Western World should follow. However instead of one side winning over the other, both sides failed, became compromised and corrupt in their greed for power and money. The best example for that is the German Revolution of 1918: Social Democrats, Anarchist and Communist revolt during a national crisis(WW1) and overthrow the German Emperor, only for the Social Democrats to ally with the aristocratic and traditionalist German Army to gun down the Anarchists and Communist. Both sell the Nation to it's enemies and found a Coalition to rule over a Capitalistic Kleptocracy, in which the upper class lives like pigs while the masses are starving and morality is abandoned. Because Liberalism and Conservatism have failed, a third way evolved. This what we know today as National Socialism and Fascism. By trying to combine National SOcialism with Bolshevism(Communism), you are polluting and subverting the third way with concepts from the same old failed and corrupt Liberalism the third way was created to destroy. Both have nothing in common. Communist try to end all Nations and try to force everyone in their global utopia they believe will come. They are anti-nationalist when they try to destroy and subvert a Nation and they are only promoting fake Nationalism for their Communist Superstate as a means to manipulate peoples tribalistic nature to fight for communism.
Everyone should take note here that the NazBols in this thread have never denied the fact that they are egalitarians, materialists, and against all private property. Yet they still deny that they are communists. >>9621 >you are polluting and subverting the third way with concepts from the same old failed and corrupt Liberalism the third way was created to destroy. Both have nothing in common. Bingo. In connection with this it is quite telling that ideas such as these quite often (almost always, really) push people away from a more pure focus on racial preservation into bizarre things that no one cares about such as long-dead African dictators, Muslim states and other assorted Marxists. NazBols from what I can see are basically a cheerleading squad for these people who masquerade as pro-White when it suits their grift.
(284.49 KB 780x875 462346.jpg)
>>9610 Name one Jewish physical feature Bill gates sports. He looks pretty White to me. >Steve Jobs was a Jew No, he was half-Syrian. Now you are just straight up making things up. You don't even have a shred of evidence to support this claim. >everyone I don't like is a Jew. White race traitors exist anon. I don't know why you can't understand that. The Jews could never have subverted our societies if it wasn't for their White collaborators. >>9612 Neither of them strike me as Semitic. Jews usually have a slightly darker complexion, also another tell-tale sign is the eyes. Middle Eastern population tend to have very distinctive eyes, and you can often see come of it in Jews. Also, >Jewish lips kek
(204.89 KB 1574x1068 jews.jpg)
(3.51 MB 4272x2848 Ashkenazi.jpg)
(65.34 KB 1000x541 Israeli PM.jpg)
>>9798 Why are you back here? >L-look this site says he isn't a jew Yeah, and kikepedia denies this as well despite him and his father having jewish features and his connection with fellow zionists. Once again you're here just to low quality post and fail at shilling as much as you fail at life. >Neither of them strike me as Semitic. Jews usually have a slightly darker complexion Ah yes, ashkenazis do not exist or are all darker complexions. It's not as if his parents interbred with ethnic Anglos and this resulted in him and his family having lighter-skin. Every you post you only know how to say something dumber, go back to cuckchan and go be a spineless moron there. Tired of you losers, you act just like spooks and kikes.
>>9798 The Rockefellers weren't jews either, but people like them and Bill Gates might as well be jewish because they're completely involved in the jewish power scheme.
>>9800 The rockefellers are jews. Their gentile or partial jewish fathers likely intermarried with jewish females, which would mean you will be treated as equal or somewhat to a jew. The Rockefellers and modern historians sold this lie that they are ethnic Europeans and Christian on purpose to lead away from the fact that ethnic jews and zionists rule the world through banks. This is all to pin lies on the christcucks and blue-pill the world. This retard is doing the same by lying about muh race traitors and liburls.
>>9798 >unironically posting an image from 'Jew or Not Jew', a site meant to mock counter-Semites This whole post is like you have never taken the time to research Jewish physiognomy. Many Jews absolutely have White skin. These are Ashkenazis, obviously. And then on top of that, once on is familiar with certain Jewish features, it becomes very easy to spot Jews and crypto-Jews. Particularly: >dolichocephalic skull shape >thick or fat lips >large nose like the number six >beady or droopy eyes >larger than average ear size
(567.80 KB 731x592 ClipboardImage.png)
(614.23 KB 680x602 ClipboardImage.png)
(657.70 KB 714x637 ClipboardImage.png)
(3.80 KB 195x200 jew face.png)
Bill fits that composite Jew head that we drew up on Anon Cafe pretty well tbh.
>>9803 >dolichocephalic skull shape Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't most jews actually brachycephalic?
>>9798 Jew or not jew, is about as reliable as wikipedia. Bill Gates is only said to be from WASPs, because his parents claimed they are, but why should we trust the mouths from a family of zionists who are downright wicked? I've seen guys who were mixed of German, Anglo, Scot and/or Irish and they do not even remotely resemble the Gates family. It seems that you don't understand the meaning of "White" nor understand what we look like by physiognomy.
>>9805 You're right, good catch. Apparently dolichocephalic skulls are actually very rare in the Jews, while brachycephalic skulls are basically 76%+ of Jews. The Jewish encyclopedia from 1906's website has a good article on this.
>>9811 This makes sense, because most Northern Europeans and Whites in general are usually dolichocephalic. Short-headed skulls are said to be common among East Asians, Africans, and Levantcucks as well.
>>9806 >>9811 It's quite misleading to say jewish unless it's confirmed, it would make a lot of sense for him to be from a crypto family though, that's where the -ish part and shabbos-goys come in, which is just as important for us, actually they are worse than just jews because they are full on 100% traitors who's life goal is following literal jewish White genocide plans and to kill and sell their own people out at every turn. Just like how it was discovered musk apparently is right just like trumpstein's family etc, these discoveries come all the time. And as we see investigating them a whole shit-ton these powerful traitors with huge wealth and abnormal success are over represented in that they have some kind of jewish blood and affiliations mixed with generational wealth.
>>9817 >It's quite misleading to say jewish unless it's confirmed, No it is not, Bill Gates looks and act like a jew, so it's quite obvious that he is one. Only /pol/tards rely on wikipedia to confirm if someone is a jew. >they are worse than just jews because they are full on 100% traitors who's life goal is following literal jewish White genocide plans and to kill and sell their own people out at every turn. You're really bad at being a subversive and need to stop IP-hopping. You're not convincing anyone other than yourself with the ignorant rhetorics and lies. He's not White and never was for he doesn't look or not act it. Your definition of White is either the common thought of it referring to light-skin Caucasian, which is obviously false.
>>9819 >No it is not, Bill Gates looks and act like a jew, so it's quite obvious that he is one. Only /pol/tards rely on wikipedia to confirm if someone is a jew. >You're really bad at being a subversive and need to stop IP-hopping. You're not convincing anyone other than yourself with the ignorant rhetorics and lies. He's not White and never was for he doesn't look or not act it. Your definition of White is either the common thought of it referring to light-skin Caucasian, which is obviously false You misunderstood my post. It's confusing and can be seen as retarded, in general, when it's not 100% confirmed to say something like that. Bill is a Crypto-jew or crypto for short. Because it's not obvious(to people outside our circles) in reality the -ISH part of jew what bill gates is and we know, but normaltards sure as fuck don't.
>>9584 This will not now, nor will it ever be, "quiet" we won't have state power at all, we will be conquering and making our own state, while opposing the crumbling remnants of the current power structure and the many varied factions we will also be opposing.
>>9822 >Bill is a Crypto-jew or crypto for short. BIll is a jew and always have been one. There's nothing crypto about him.
Bill Gates may be a jew but it's not certain either
>>9825 Well then since you make the claim you can provide the evidence of his family we are eagerly waiting for.
>>9867 The real question is whether it is safer to conclude that someone is a Jew until there is hard evidence, or that someone is not a Jew until otherwise proven. When I go with most people I use the latter assumption usually, but sometimes with the elite the former may be warranted.
>>9872 Well you can still be suspicious without knowing enough to be certain
>>9868 We already gave the evidence, you just refuse to accept it just like you refuse to accept that it is not healthy in being a faggot. What more could it be obvious that he is a jew due to his support for Israel and the fact that he has worked and aligns with top powerful jews.
>>9610 >If Bill Gates was exposed to be a jew, then it would reveal that the jews rule the world. If you are unsure that jews run the world if Bill Gates is not a jew, then you do not understand where jewish power comes from or what it is. I will explain this to you since you clearly have not listened to Dr. William Pierce. Jewish power is simple; They are the only people networking for racial dominance among the ruling class and they have media dominance. All the gentile capitalists do not give a shit about you, despite all your cucking for them. They are not racially conscious. The jews on the otherhand are fiercely racially conscious. Thus, jews are effortlessly able to dominate the culture and direction of the ruling class. >Remember that this is the same guy who supports Israel and has done nothing, but hung around and worked with fellow jews. Is George Bush a jew? Is Donald Trump a jew? Is Barrack Obama a jew? Is Hillary Clinton a jew? All these people meet the ideological standards you presented as evidence that Gates is a jew. You do not seem to understand that being a jew is not an ideological choice but a racial group. >all you've done here is post lies and dare call anyone jewish. Not sure if you messed up your insult, but the only one spewing lies is you. And your lies coincidentally are immensely damaging to genuine counter-semites like me. Every time you make an easily refuted claim about someone's ancestry, you discredit all the true claims I make. If you go around screaming that Bill Gates, George Bush, and Obama are all jews, people will be more likely to dismiss me when I correctly say that Larry Paige, Mark Zuckerberg, and Sari Redstone are jews. > Almost every rich (((billionaire))) has done nothing, but support Israel, communicate exclusively with powerful jews, and validated all of their lies. >every rich person who has fought against the White race and help Zion enslave humanity has been a jew. Holy shit. You're actually an idiot.
>>9597 >If you support NazBol you are supporting communism. If communism is pro-White, then by definition, you are being anti-White. If communism is not pro-White, then by definition, I cannot be a communist. > You have not denied any of the accusations that have been raised against you about leveling the social order, egalitarianism, abolishing private property By definition, anyone who is pro-White wants to raise the (((social order))). No one has ever made any true specific claims about what I or NazBols believe about economic agendas. So I genuinely have no idea whether my National Socialist views on capitalism are egalitarian in your warped view. But I will proudly state that I believe in nationalizing many corporations. Especially media corporations. Does that offend you? Cucking for capitalists who want you dead is identical to cuckservatives cucking for niggers who want them dead. They openly and in no uncertain terms have stated that they want White genocide. They hate the White working class. They chose jews and niggers over us. And no matter how much you cuck for them, no matter how much you suck their cock, they will always hate you too.
>>9621 >In the 18th century Europe you had the original Liberals and their various offshoots like Socialism, Communism, Capitalism, Republicanism and Anarchism etc. You forgot one; Nationalism. History is not the black and White dichotomy you want it to be. Also, >Both sell the Nation to it's enemies and found a Coalition to rule over a Capitalistic Kleptocracy, in which the upper class lives like pigs while the masses are starving and morality is abandoned. Yes. That is why I do not like capitalism. >>9795 ought to take note since you clearly did not read that part if you are freaking out over my anti-capitalist views. Communism is a spook ideology that has nothing to do with helping the working class. Communists actually hate and fear the working class.
>>10125 >No one has ever made any true specific claims about what I or NazBols believe about economic agendas. Then you should not be identifying with the term if you don't support literal Communism masquerading under a nationalistic guise. That's what NazBol is.
>>10129 I just want you to know that you're wasting your time responding to a subversive jew.
>>10130 Yeah, I think you're mostly right.
>>10125 >>10126 >No one has ever made any true specific claims about what I or NazBols believe about economic agendas Actually we did, here's my example: >Some people think that sucking the cock of anti-White billionaires is the path to survival. You confuse and unironically think that these billionaires are White, denying their zionist agendas and connections as a whole. Refusing to accept that most billionaires are kikes and were made to be rich on purpose for a greater global plan. This something nazbols all deny and argue insteaf for the the idea that being rich is a "sin" and the sole reason why the world is like it is today. Negating factors such as technology, Judiasm and its influence on the European court systems, the rise of powerful semitic merchants across thr world, etc. Simply put you all unironically believe that the world's problems would be solved by killing or overthrowing the rich, even if they are not guility of anything. >Civic nationalist cuckoldry. You strawmanned anon and reject the idea of uniting all Whites and eliminating class-disctintion for collective interest and health as "civic nationalism". No one else would insult something like this other than Bolshevieks and liberals, but you're a special shill, so you have to lie and call it something that we clearly hate to cover that you aren't a true WN. My favorite one is here >Why did they fail if capitalists are so based? Seems like everyone apart from Ford was a jew worshiper, even according to your pro-liberal/capitalist version of history. >How much of his extraordinary wealth did he spend "radicalizing" (informing) Americans? Just more strawmans and downplaying Henry Ford and others' great achievements. You blame everything on the fault of the rich even when they do act and succeed in undermining the jews. There is a special hatred for them because they didn't do things they way you wanted. All politics are racial, unless they disagree with your nazbol perspectives. >You forgot one; Nationalism. You really thought you made point here did you? Both sides have a different definition of their own nationalism. Fascism nationalism rejects the liberal version of it. >you are freaking out over my anti-capitalist views. You aren't anti-capitalist you just hate the rich in general and clearly show yourself to believe in the lie that is class-warfare. You're trying to divide and conquer the poor and the rich Whites, but claim to be knowledgeable of realpoltik and what is suitable for White survival. These hypocripsies and inconsistent views of yours have only shown that you have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to racial politics and White nationalism. The anti-capitalism you are arguing for is Bolshveikism, not fascism and you clearly distinct yourself from our views and Hitler's on why every rich White man should be liqudated and that the White capitalists who are not guility of any thing should automatically be treated like dirt like racial traitors. All these arguments, speakings, and ideas are things (((National Bolshvieks))) support as they try to ignorantly pin the blame on liberals for everything as if socialists and jews didn't lead Europe to the fate it is today. The refusal to acknowledge that the liberal is only a jew and that ideaological "ism" are a distraction from the truth for why Whites are like they are today, is blue-pilled and denial of racial politics itself.
>>10144 >You confuse and unironically think that these billionaires are White Your assertions to the contrary are not evidence. Since I follow the truth rather than comforting lies, I must accept that Bill Gates is a White collaborator, not a jew. >denying their zionist agendas and connections as a whole That is a lie. And an outrageous one since I constantly point out that the White collaborators are zionists. >you all unironically believe that the world's problems would be solved by killing or overthrowing the rich, even if they are not guility of anything. Again, false. I believe that the world's problems will be resolved when the jews and all their collaborators are shot. Then the niggers, the liberals, and other threats to our race. So far all you have accused me of has been inaccurate. > uniting all Whites and eliminating class-disctintion for collective interest and health as "civic nationalism". You cannot unite with people who want you dead. >everyone apart from Ford was a jew worshiper Unironically yes. Cite a single living capitalist oligarch who is not a zionist and a liberal. >You blame everything on the fault of the rich even when they do act and succeed in undermining the jews. If Ford succeeded in undermining the jews, why did America enter WW2 against Germany? >There is a special hatred for them because they didn't do things they way you wanted Because they are not pro-White. I am a genuine White nationalist. You are a pseud and a pretender because you excuse racial treason and zionism among collaborationist elites while I do not forgive them for trying to exterminate us. > All politics are racial, unless they disagree with your nazbol perspectives. All politics are racial, period. >You aren't anti-capitalist Laughable considering you just accused me of being anti-capitalist. >You're trying to divide and conquer the poor and the rich Whites They are already divided. The rich ones are all zionists. >The anti-capitalism you are arguing for is Bolshveikism Then Adolf Hitler was a Bolshevik. > ignorantly pin the blame on liberals for everything as if socialists and jews didn't lead Europe to the fate it is today. ALL modern socialists in the West are liberals LARPing as communists. They have totally embraced anti-White bigotry and support the rule of capitalist corporations. Literally every single thing you accused me of was an abject lie.
(188.64 KB 768x768 gay corporate logos.jpg)
>>10129 >Then you should not be identifying with the term I never did. I was accused of being a NazBol by someone who lies with every single sentence >>10144 >>10671 And by someone who literally is spamming SHUT IT DOWN!!!! >>10130 I am pro-White. Period. Whatever ideology means pro-White, that is what I am. And since I am pro-White, I hate capitalism which is inherently anti-White. Since I am pro-White, I hate race traitors who openly call for my extermination.
>>10671 >>10672 You are jew stop coming here D&C.
>>10672 What are your stances on >nationalism >private property >egalitarianism >hierarchy >Marxism This is your last chance to prove you aren't a subverter.
>>10671 >Laughable considering you just accused me of being anti-capitalist. So are you anti-capitalist or not? It's not an accusation if it's true. Also he argued that you weren't truly against capitalism. >Then Hitler was a Bolshviek At-least read what your opponent is arguing. Hitler's anti-capitalism was class unification, while Bolshevism is class-division. Hitler didn't care if you were rich or poor, what truly mattered to him was the race, and all the Aryans working together for their collective interests. The fact I have to spoon-fed you this is proof that you spend more time reading Marx over the Mein Kampf and are skimming through posts. >ALL modern socialists in the West are liberals Thanks for confirming that you are nazbol and invalidating your denial. You aren't Pro-White in the sense of the word, but are just a worthless shill because only leftists and nazbol trannies believes this moronic cope. There's no difference between the liberal and a communist outside of the fact that they have different end goals. Calling modern socialists larpers is just a refusal to accept that socialism is a failure and holds no true opposition nor differenation against liberalism as it does with capitalism. Communism has always been a radical and much more Judaic form of liberalism. I don't care what Marxist advocate, because I look at their ideologies history and actions and it all confirms that they are no different from 19th century French liberals. >Literally every single thing you accused me of was an abject lie. You done a spectatular job of proving that you aren't a fascist, so I would have to say he's correct on mostly he accuses you. >>10672 >And by someone who literally is spamming SHUT IT DOWN!!!! No one is acting this way, anons are just tired of seeing a low quality poster who lies and fails to read and comprehend posts. >I am pro-White. Period. Whatever ideology means pro-White, that is what I am. If you are pro-White then you will advocate class-unification and not division and not lie about pro-White capitalists being worthless, because they didn't do the things that you unrealisticly expected out of them, acting as if zionists do not contain more power than rich Whites. Also a flaw in this idea that something or someone is pro-White, just because they or it allows Whites to only survive, and read carefully, does not mean it is something good to follow behind and support. The Soviet Union didn't flood Russia with browns and yet it was still a country that was ran by jewish pedophiles who dehumanized ethnic Russians and made several attempts to destroy their culture and assisted the anti-Aryan agendas of our racial enemies. By this logic any country or leader is good for Whites as long as they get to live and breath, and slowly breed even when Whites are being poisoned and reduced to slaves. You are not convicing me that you are pro-White, but just some idiot who has an obsessession with this thread and refuse to give-up on his Judeo views. Either drop them or go back to /pol/, if you refuse, then you are only confirming your accusations. Stop bumping this dumb thread.
>>3395 Thuletide's two articles about NB and Dugin are must reads and you should save these pages too, or archive them. This thread is most important. We must expose all forms of controlled opposition as they stand against our survival, power and liberty. NB is obviously not White in the slightest. >>3400 Yes they do, although their podcast and moderation criteria suck completely are not up to the overall website's quality. They also have that still strong pro-woman bent that triggers them easily, because Hunt is his wife's bitch. He can't even handle her on the Broadcast shows, it's pathetic. Not that she has nothing of value to say, but there's obviously not even an ounce of authority exuded by Hunt when she starts to open her claptrap. It's unfortunate because it sort of hurts RT's criticism of Anglin. Still, they have such a good bunch of articles against Daily Stormer's Anglin and I never tire of directing people at them. renegadetribune.com/tag/andrew-anglin/ renegadetribune.com/andrew-anglin-daily-stormer-timeline-deception/ renegadetribune.com/greg-anglin-con-artist-fraud-and-serial-womanizer/ It is important to understand all the forms NB will take to disrupt our victory. Why is Andrew Anglin a NB shill? Because he ticks all the boxes. We must preserve the existence of our people and a future for White children. Care to explain how you are going to uphold this when Anglin never once even tries to promote a respectable vision of White women integrated into a proper White National Socialist worldview? Anglin has those pointy eyes which we often find in Eastern Jews too which already makes him very shady. The main and obvious feature of undercover NB is the promotion of the Russian-Chinese axis. With Anglin, everything about China and Chinese women is superior. China is above White nations because they do not have democracy (which we know to be a Jewish tool) and are therefore free, as if living under a communist regime prevented a country from being owned, if only intellectually, by Jews. Another vector of NasBolism is in the defense of Christianity or any form of recycling of Abrahamic cults, albeit Whitened on the surface, as if this alone would suffice. And by Whitened I mean the old tired farce of being a White Nationalist and Christian at the same time. As the absurd contradiction that National Bolshevism is, Anglin already referred to the Fourteen Words while defend Christianity at the same time, pushing even further the unthinkable limits of bridging a life-affirming and segregating pro-White principle to a universalist, Semitic death cult. And let not yourself be duped about the lack of liquidity DS supposedly always suffers from. It is most obvious he's a paid shill. He's not alone either.
>>10865 As part of the list provided above, this one exposes Anglin's duplicity further and also covers the rest of his fucked up family: renegadetribune.com/christcuckoldry-celibacy-psychopathy-and-the-daily-stormer/ The next one covers the DS' routine part on attacking White women. It also deals with Feminism at large and provides a solid strategy out of the Jewish mind trap: renegadetribune.com/stormer-fallacy-blaming-White-women/
>>10872 Renegade Tribune stinks to high heaven. The only time I see this site being cited is because they're slandering someone and engaging in personal attacks and drama.
>>10748 >The Soviet Union didn't flood Russia with browns and yet it was still a country that was ran by jewish pedophiles who dehumanized ethnic Russians and made several attempts to destroy their culture and assisted the anti-Aryan agendas of our racial enemies. The Soviet Union literally went to war against israel.
>>10875 I have never seen them expose anyone not worth exposing, in my experience (Spencer, Anglin, Cultured Thug, Enoch).
>>10878 Not familiar with them, but you make it sound like they just go after people who don't subscribe to American conservative orthodoxy + racism.
>>10878 Why are you so interesting in 'exposing' people who speak out against the regime? Shouldn't you be more worried about exposing the jews with actual power that are destroying the world?
>>10880 >>10879 If a movement does not have quality control over those who are setting themselves up as a figureheads, the movement will flounder and be led astray. Public figureheads are the most important individuals. They spread ideas to the masses of passive followers, and they give a public image which normalfags associate with the rest of White Nationalism. With all of the people I listed in my previous post there are loads of suspicious connections and ideas pushed. Cultured Thug is the least egregious of the four by a long shot, but there is no reason why the other three should be accepted by any self-respecting White Nationalist. It is people like them, or people like Matt Heimbach, who hold us back. Renegade Tribune does great service to our people. They spread much good information about National Socialism, White Genocide, the Jews, the Great Reset, and promote European artists of the past and present in dedicated articles there, spreading White culture in the process. They are also uncompromising in regards to Christianity and similar religions that are killing us. The fact that they support people like Pierce, Rockwell, Savitri Devi and similar figures shows to me that they are legit and willing to expose Nazbols.
>>10881 >Renegade Tribune does great service to our people. They spread much good information about National Socialism, White Genocide, the Jews, the Great Reset, and promote European artists of the past and present in dedicated articles there, spreading White culture in the process. They are also uncompromising in regards to Christianity and similar religions that are killing us. The fact that they support people like Pierce, Rockwell, Savitri Devi and similar figures shows to me that they are legit and willing to expose Nazbols. Yeah.. but doesn't TRS do all of that, too? To a much greater audience than Renegade Tribune?
>>10882 TRS is associated with Kike Enoch though, which says everything we need to know. Even if it looks like a tasty meal, it is laced with poison.
>>10881 Sounds like you made the site yourself. It's a terrible idea to listen to the anonymous accusations of posters on image boards and obscure sites about 'exposing' people who have invested thousands of hours into White advocacy and personally suffered repercussions to do so. Who's going to do the quality control you speak of? You, anonymous internet poster with a newcomer site that has a terrible track record of attacking all the established figures? I don't think so.
>>10884 > It's a terrible idea to listen to the anonymous accusations of posters on image boards and obscure sites about 'exposing' people who have invested thousands of hours into White advocacy and personally suffered repercussions to do so. Please, the sort of stuff that people post on these people are literally clips of their own words and posts / tweets that these people themselves have put out. That's the value of the content like that, that anyone can see for their own eyes that many of these figures are bad news. Anglin, Enoch and Spencer literally provide nothing of value for White Nationalism. >Sounds like you made the site yourself. No, just because I recognize the value of a site that I occasionally browse myself doesn't mean I made it or that I fully endorse it as 100% reliable and infallible.
>>10883 >>10886 I think the effort that Mike and the other guys at TRS have put into exposing the holohoax and trying to highlight the scholarly work of Mottogno and Rudolf has been valuable. As well as Striker's work deconstructing conservatism.
>>10887 And yet it is ran by a man with a Jewish wife and mixed-race relatives, not to mention the fact that he hid this for years. Does that not cause you to stop and think?
>>10888 Way to lie on the first sentence of your post. That does make me stop and think.
>>10888 I can get the "Jewish wife" thing beig repulsive but he can't change the fact that he has "mixed race relatives". Cutting off from relatives cannot be easy.
>>10891 Sorry a Jewish ex-wife! That he didn't divorce until he was doxed. That changes everything
>>10897 It does. He lives in New York where 9% of the population is jewish and most of them are liberals that don't care about intermarrying. I don't see how marrying a half-jewess in NY when he was a lolbertarian means anything.
(583.58 KB 844x479 ClipboardImage.png)
>>10900 His wife worked for B'nai B'rith, a Jewish service organization. B'nai B'rith states that it is committed to the security and continuity of the Jewish people and the State of Israel and combating anti-Semitism and bigotry. As soon as this man got redpilled, if he was serious he would have divorced his kike wife and threw her out of on the streets. Ignorance is no excuse at that point.
>>10902 Most people don't disown family members over politics.
>>10908 Not everyone is fit to be a political fanatic, clearly. But these people then shouldn't try to prop themselves up as paragons and figureheads. Wherever a great man goes, all the world will follow. Everyone looks up to leaders. When you're fat, married to a Jewess working at B'Nai B'rith and have mongrels in your family (that you still associate with), it is clear that this person should not put themselves in the spotlight as any sort of representative of White Nationalism. Because it's literally a joke, just like how Heimbach and some other retard in his party literally had some trailer park fight involving a cuckbox and sleeping with another man's wife. Embarrassing. These people are even extremely retarded or feds.
>>10875 >Renegade Tribune stinks to high heaven. The only time I see this site being cited is because they're slandering someone and engaging in personal attacks and drama. Nice try. The content of their website, the seriousness of their articles and the promotion of White history, peoples and culture speak louder than your flimsy attempts at damage control. Anything else to add?
>>10880 And this is why I said that reading Thuletide's articles was paramount to understanding the long term problem. Besides, 18+ answers on this calm board since I posted the content this morning, it looks like someone hit a nerve.
>>10909 I'll take you more seriously when you stop being anonymous, disown all your family member who don't believe in national socialism and create a more successful site than TRS. Until then, I just think you're a jew or a zogbot yourself.
(2.76 MB 480x480 hitler video.mp4)
>>10915 You're just a TRS shill at this point, it's obvious. I wouldn't put myself out there as a some sort of White Nationalist figurehead if I had a family full of Jews and mutts. Imagine spending time defending this human garbage. Look to real heroes, not ecelebs with Jewish wives.
>>10884 >Oy vey stop attacking our shabbo goys! it costs us a lot of shekels (and err... hours) to prep them!! >why does it matter if those super nazi websites are owned, funded or just plain related to fellow jews? |> | |3 We wonder. https://archive.org/details/IsMikeEnochOfTRSJewishLetsFindOut >"Jew Hater" Mike Enoch of TRS Admitting He is a Jew "Of Coursh!" > Publication date > 2018-07-04 > Topics > Mike Enoch, TRS, anti-White racism, sabotage >Mike Enoch is a fraud. He pretends to be a non-Jewish White nationalist who hates Jews and promotes a virulent form of anti-Semitism because he so "loves" the White race and "hates" their supposed enemy "The Jew." >Here he is in his own words admitting not only that he was married to a Left-wing Jew but is one himself. The recordings come from early "Daily Shoah" podcasts. >Is it merely a "cohen-cidence" that Enoch's form of "White advocacy" is perfectly calibrated to confine White identitarianism to a toxic little ghetto where it can never reach the normie masses? >Meanwhile in Europe identitarians go from strength to strength by ignoring the trajectory that (((Enoch))) and his friends advocate for American nationalists and identitarians in the USA. >>10902 >His wife worked for B'nai B'rith KEK. That's like just one notch below Mossad. >B'nai B'rith states that it is committed to White genocide and Jewish supremacy.
>>10917 Of all the reasons why you wouldn't put yourself out there as a WN figurehead, those are fairly low on the list. You wouldn't do it because >you're a coward who wants to hide behind an anonymous internet persona <you don't have the charisma or intelligence to attract any audience >you don't have the expertise to stay on the game despite having the entire regime wanting to censor you <you're literally a jew or zogbot
>>10865 Wodensson's own motto grafted onto the Fourteen Words was: >Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth We so get that feeling when reading DS, don't we frens?
>>10920 >Of all the reasons why you wouldn't put yourself out there as a WN figurehead, those are fairly low on the list. <having Jews and mutts in your family and being fat as fuck These are actually the WORST things someone could do as a White Nationalist. Fuck off, faggot.
>>10923 It didn't stop him, though. So what's your excuse?
>>10918 >>Is it merely a "cohen-cidence" that Enoch's form of "White advocacy" is perfectly calibrated to confine White identitarianism to a toxic little ghetto where it can never reach the normie masses? I'm pretty sure they are already reaching a very large audience. Large enough where they have completely undercut the occupation regime's first line administrators, the conservatives. >Meanwhile in Europe identitarians I assume you're talking about the israel/steve bannon organized cadre of kosher nationalist parties -- AfD, Sweden Democrats, Fidesz, etc?
>>10924 Being an e-celeb grifter doesn't appeal to Whites who aren't spiritually jewish.
>>10937 Nice cope, fag.
>>10939 Keep sucking some fat jewish faggot's cock, fucking nerd. Better yet, fuck off back to 4chan where simple-minded retards like you jack off to BASED jew and spic grifters all day.
>>10939 He's right though, you're the one coping hard and sucking off some beady-eyed kike.
(31.52 KB 645x444 pepe hammer.jpg)
>be (((Mike Peinovich))) >be married to a Jewess >run my little 'White Nationalist' website and trick goyim for a living for years while married to a Jewess >get doxed >the goyim figured out I'm married to a Jewess >OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN, THE GRIFT IS UP, I GOTTA ACT QUICK >quickly divorce my Jewess wife >dumb goyim believe it and think I'm based still Yikes
>>10943 >muh Shapiro
>>10943 Your posts sound like >a pathetic attempt at self-promotion That, or a really butthurt fan. >There's a reason nobody is looking at your shit. Shit, you're right. Being a self-absorbed fat faggot and trading money for lip service online sounds like such an honorable profession. I'll get right on that...
>Nazbol thread >it's absolute garbage and full of eceleb shit Imagine my shock
>>10948 And I guess you'll continue being a retarded faggot with no identity who has to be told what to think by a fat jewish grifter. Talking to nobody is better than talking to someone as fucking dumb as you. Neither you nor your doughboy bring anything of value to the conversation. Feel free to fuck off whenever.
>>10950 lol now not only you'll have to settle for writing posts on obscure chans that nobody will read but it'll also appear like you're talking to yourself become the janny deleted everything
>>10951 Only a retard would get that impression. You're very desperate to get the last word in, as if it validates you pathetically orbiting a fat kike. You may as well just watch whores on Twitch all day. Nothing is keeping you posting here besides your own bruised ego. Again, feel free to fuck off whenever.
>>10955 Imagine thinking anybody other than your broken cumbrain cares about getting the last word on a dead board about a dead ideology.
>>10956 I don't give a shit about nazbol crap. I just saw you being a huge fag and derailing the thread by shilling for your favorite fat faggot. Keep pouting, little guy.
>>10957 I don't understand how an ideology about unity tolerates fags like you who are clearly only trying to sow disunity. And sure, I'll take my favorite fat faggot anytime over you mentally ill retards.
>>10958 <wah wah wah y-y-you don't like my pet e-celeb grifter, you are d/c!!!1 Just because no one else is retarded enough to fall for the jewish father simulator you're stuck on doesn't mean that at all. You're basically not even a real person at this point with how butthurt you get on behalf of some literal who fat jew who tries to corral people when he can't even be bothered to reflect what he preaches. You got scammed out of your time (maybe money too) thinking about this asshole. Boo hoo, cry more. If your feelings weren't so fragile, you would've fucked off to go whine in Kike's ear a long time ago instead of continue sitting here and shitting yourself. Stay mad, 4toddler.
>>10960 That's a lot of words to say absolutely nothing.
>>10962 >too mad to give any actual response or even just gracefully bow out and fuck off finally Keep screeching into the void, since this little faggot derailment and temper tantrum you're on is probably gonna be deleted the same as earlier. >and nothing of value was lost
>>10963 Dude, you're clearly the only one throwing a temper tantrum here. I'm just wondering why Mike Peinovich evokes such a histrionic reaction on you.
>>10944 >>10918 I didn't know this, It's really amazing isn't it. About the only "e celebs" I ever followed was WLP, Zundel, AJ before the cuckening. Patrick little(awol).. >>10956 Don't you understand that it's fucking nonsense to think just listening to some person will change anything at all when you're already redpilled? Reminder that you are not redpilled if you don't accept yeah killem and see politics more as a para operation, still important but as a means to an end that doesn't begin at the voting stall for cattle, because jews are WAGING SUBVERSIVE GENOCIDE, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL WARFARE and will NEVER allow us to get there to the booth, and if we get there they fake entire elections without problems, because we already know that now in America of all places the jews just baldface callously faked the entire biden election without a care in the world, in the supposed "home of democracy", let nigger vandal looters, aronists, run amok with support but terrorize and jail all who protested the election, calling them terrorists for merely entering a building, when niggers were robbing entire neighborhoods. Really sets the standard for the rest of the world, Because of how they operate it's plausible for all we know that they have when their attempts to get rid of political canidates they don't like fail, proceed to fake entire elections of nearly all countries since 1945. >>10949 nazbol is literally meme so we use it for random shit we will never compromise with leftards or jews, also this thread probably attracts idiots so there's that.
>>10964 <n-no ur the mad 1... Says the faggot who goes on and on about how he'd rather being jacking off into some jew's fat rolls instead of arguing with "retards" on muh dead website. Funny that you're still here if it's such a big problem for you. Like I said, I prefer a slower pace if it means not having a few dozen clowns like yourself wasting all their time pushing the conversation in a mindless direction (as you have been doing all day). If you're such an ADHD-ridden child that you need higher PPH, feel free to fuck off back to 4chan. I'm just pointing and laughing at the retard in this thread (you). I don't think about some fat dumb kike besides when his retarded orbiters bring him up. If you weren't a loser, you wouldn't either.
>>10968 You're a mentally ill terminally online broken brain faggot. lol.
>>10970 Means nothing coming from someone so bent on orbiting some random faggot online. You're just sad at this point.
>>10971 I bet you hate Richard Spencer too? He's one of our best guys.
>>10974 >I bet you hate Richard Spencer too? He's one of our best guys. I agree he is one of (((your))) best jews.
>>10876 >The Soviet Union literally went to war against israel The SU literally created Israel. Shut the fuck up and go back to reddit. Stalin was a literal zionist and you can't argue against that so you're just going to have to cope.
>>10977 He's not a jew, he's nordic with blonde hair and blue eyes.
>>10979 Pretended to be retarded still makes you a retard.
>>10980 You just make wild accusations and pretend everyone who disagrees is retard.
>>10974 Yeah, he sucks dicks too. You don't belong here, with your obsession of e-celeb cucks. Just fuck off the zero PPH board you're so butthurt over already. You're just as big a faggot as your false idols are, and your feelings are a hundredfold more fragile.
>>10876 >The Soviet Union literally went to war against israel. lol. Are we forgetting that The Soviet Union helped create the state of Israel and was the first country to recognize them as an independent country? Or how about the fact that Lenin criminalized antisemitism and invented the term "racism"? Stalin still kept the laws despite the betrayal from the kikes within Palestine and that's likely, because most of his closet companions and governors were jews. They only declared war against Israel, because they didn't want to join the comintern, because they knew that America had more power and resources than the Stalin's failed republic. >>10981 >You just make wild accusations and pretend everyone who disagrees is retard. You are indeed a retard who only comes here to troll and have bad arguments with the (1)s and lying. Your attention-whoring is tranny-tier.
>>10985 >re we forgetting that The Soviet Union helped create the state of Israel Why do you guys always freeze time when you make your arguments? Is it because you think every country operates like the (((West))) where policy never changes despite outward changes in leadership?
marxism of any form is jewish simple as
>>10987 >Why do you guys always freeze time when you make your arguments? Why do you continue to forget that it was the SU that acknowledged zionism first? You keep ignoring this and pretending that this never happened and refuse to argue why it's wrong. >Soviet anti-zionism The Soviet Union never attacked jews as capitalist they only hated capitalists and that jews were one of them instead of just becoming oligarchs for the Bolsheviks, your article is just simply wrong. The supposed antizionist rhetorics and actions were only a direct response to Israel's betrayal, although this was never indicated as hatred of the jewish race. They stance on Judaism is only similar to how the left today hates Israel, but not the jews themselves, because they denounce racism. https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/03/13/the-ussr-invented-hate-speech-laws/ https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/03/15/quotes-anti-racism-of-lenin-trotsky-and-stalin https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1251&context=prism
>>10985 >>10989 >The Soviet Union never attacked jews as capitalist they only hated capitalists and that jews were one of them instead of just becoming oligarchs for the Bolsheviks Jews certainly didn't see it that way and they made that abundantly clear with their behavior after the wall came down. But, I'm not going to press the issue any further. I'm getting strong conservative priors vibes.
>>10990 >Jews certainly didn't see it that way and they made that abundantly clear with their behavior after the wall came down You're so blue-pilled and you clearly show yourself as a pawn of the jews, because every true WN knows a simple fact here. JEWS PLAY AND ACT ON ANY SIDE OF POLITICAL SPECTURM, they will act as anarchist, fascists, conservatives, liberals, communists, etc etc. Their role in politics is to control and manipulate all political parties and groups, so they will never face a true opposition like they've done with the NSDAP, but none of that was needed Soviet Russia, because they were already a jewish state. I'm sorry, but your cope about muh jews leaving the SU doesn't hold-up, because they've lied about the true reason why they left Russia for Weimerica, the same country that got indoctrinated by Marxists as soon as the kikes arrived. >I'm getting strong conservative priors vibes. I'm getting strong "I love Stalin's cummies and pretend to hate the state of Israel" vibes from (you), only that it is closer to the truth than your retarded projection and boogeyman that of muh conservatives. cuckservatives aren't the only ones who hate Marxists you know? They only hate them for the wrong reasons, but it's not as if they aren't liberals or Trotskyites themselves. We despise you nazbols faggots and will literally put your head on a spike. Go away and go back to /pol/, kike.
(42.30 KB 600x373 BuchananGottfriedSpencer.jpeg)
>>10990 >Jews certainly didn't see it that way and they made that abundantly clear with their behavior after the wall came down. You do realize that jews will complain and leave countries for the smallest shit right? If America banned jews from reading and practicing the radical views of the (((Torah))), then many American kikes will move from the United States to Canada. The Soviet Union wasn't le based, it was cringe and blue-pilled and was never pro-White. A pro-White state and anti-semitic nation must be ran by Whites, purge and eliminate the jew, and seek to improve our kin, not use them for proxy wars and not idealisms. You clearly aren't for pro-White politics and shot yourself in the foot by defending (((Richard Spencer))), aka the guy who was tutored by the paleocon (((Paul Gottfried))), blames the state of everything on le White liberals and a proud supporter of Joe Biden as he proudly get vaccinated. I know it must be boring working at the spooks office, but you won't find anything here that you CIAniggers haven't seen before.
>>10994 I never brought up Richard Spencer. There's several different posters here. >You do realize that jews will complain and leave countries for the smallest shit right? If America banned jews from reading and practicing the radical views of the (((Torah))), then many American kikes will move from the United States to Canada. Doesn't seem to jive with the historical record. Plenty of "small things" that happened to jews in the liberalizing "West" over the decades and even centuries now and they've never packed up en mass. Not like they did in Germany or the USSR.
>>10984 You fags are just mad because you'll never be as cool as Richard Spencer or Nick Fuentes.
>>10126 >You forgot one; Nationalism. History is not the black and White dichotomy you want it to be. I did not. European Nationalism was birthed by the French Revolution in the 18th century, at the time it was a liberal concept that opposed the previous concept of kingdoms. If the state is a nation, the state belongs to all the people of the nation. If the state is a kingdom, all the people in it are subjects of the king. The Napoleonic Wars then caused Germans regardless of political faction to adopt Nationalism, because it became obvious that the aristocratic system of the ailing Holy Roman Empire was not able to stand against French Nationalism. It's not a black & White dichotomy, but an evolution of ideas. French intellectuals invented Nationalism to get rid of the Monarchy, but German intellectuals adopted Nationalism because they didn't want to be subjects of the French Empire and wanted to live in a modern ethnic German state, regardless if it was ruled by a Monarch or a Parliament. Then if you look at 19th century Germany, you see Liberals and Conservatives fighting each others at first, but then their ideas became mixed up and each betraying their original goals(destroying the old ruling class/saving monarchism) for power. Some liberals accepted a German Emperor, while some conservatives accepted and adopted liberal ideas of how the state should look like and all of this ended with the German Social Democrats and German Conservatives allying to create the Hell Hole that was Weimar Germany. This in turn caused the creation of a new movement centered around protecting German culture and traditions in a new state that didn't continue the failed and corrupt political systems of Liberalism and Conservatism. It's name was the Völkisch Movement and National Socialism was born from it.
>>11001 >I never brought up Richard Spencer. There's several different posters here. Nice try, but you're the only person here who has been creating (1)s, while defending e-celeb. >Doesn't seem to jive with the historical record. It does jive with the historical records, you just refuse to read anything we prove to you, unless it proves your shitty point. The jew plays both sides and they've never hated the SU. There still exist a Marxist-Leninst party in Israel that adores Stalin, where is there indication that the Soviet Republic was an enemy of zion when it has helped them since day one and Israeli do not have any intense hatred for communism? Jews leaving Russia seems to be the only argument you have to shill that they were le based.
You're all wasting your time talking with this guy. He only posts on this thread for attention. You be better off doing something productive or talking about some interesting things you discovered.
>>10957 Post in the only nazbol thread here. >I don't give a shit about nazbol crap. Right. I suggest you and the other anon just kick off and leave this place quiet, your input is below tolerable.
>>10987 Quit autojewing, it's embarrassing. You probably don't even know the meaning of the word pilpul. The SU would not exist without Jews. They are as much powerful now as they were in 1920. You're falling for the most basic trick, thinking that if a Jew stands against a Jewish group (or pretends to), then what he aligns with on the other hand must be right and appropriate. There has never been a single Jewish system or doctrine that did us any good.
>>11021 >>11065 >The SU would not exist without Jews. USSR in 1922 is not the USSR in 1952 is not the USSR in 1982. But it doesn't really matter. I'm just arguing with the same dead King Abdullah agitprop from the Cold War.
>>11010 >I did not. European Nationalism was birthed by the French Revolution in the 18th century, at the time it was a liberal concept that opposed the previous concept of kingdoms. It was an abstract concept of putting people under a banner regardless of culture, history or even blood (race). This model was Masonic and is exactly what has been applied in the United States. >>11010 >Some liberals accepted a German Emperor, while some conservatives accepted and adopted liberal ideas of how the state should look like and all of this ended with the German Social Democrats and German Conservatives allying to create the Hell Hole that was Weimar Germany. Hmm... stupid Krauts who were responsible of the Weimar Republic.
>>11067 It has never been anti-Jews, nor pro-White. All its internal variations over the decades are irrelevant. Internal bickerings between Jews do not concern us, it just adds to the useless confusion.
>>11062 This entire thread should be erased from existence, because every soycialist has been exposed to be a jew and anti-White. >>11069 >Hmm... stupid Krauts who were responsible of the Weimar Republic. He never implied that, you're not very smart and it clearly shows. I noticed that you enjoy leaving out the work of the jew in many contributions and actions. Liberals were very philosemitic during the 19th and 20th century. German liberals were forced to accept a German Emperor due to Bismarck's will to assert traditional European hierarchy. >>11070 You can tell him this for the fifth time and he will never recognize this and realize that he in the defense for a Semitic state. We can only assert that the reasons for his imbecilic posts is because he is a jew himself and seeks to subvert and divert our attention towards Marxists.
>>11075 >This entire thread should be erased from existence, because every soycialist has been exposed to be a jew and anti-White. It's endlessly entertaining to see how pathetic these people are though!
>>11010 >European Nationalism was birthed by the French Revolution in the 18th century Are you claiming that before an arbitrary date, the deep feeling of belonging and togetherness expressed by people within an Ethnos did not exist?
>>11070 >It has never been anti-Jews, nor pro-White. Anon never claimed that the USSR was pro-White. Will you address the actual point or keep strawmanning?
>>11101 >>11102 Are you ever going to answer this simple question? >>10698
>>11102 (((You))) were trying to make it seem as if they were less Judaic than America. You are gay and annoying and procceed to say nothing of value here.
>>11103 His non answer means yes. He's dodging the question on purpose.
>>11150 >as if they were less Judaic than America. After the certain point, they were.
>>11152 >After the certain point, they were. Thus it wasn't a strawman that you implied they were more pro-White, also you're wrong and still refuse to read our articles that prove otherwise. You are an idiot and a sad one at worst.
>muh dates The Soviet Republic has always been Judaic. Stalin wanted jews to view communism as their new religion. There was never any counterments nor hatred against jews which is why the anti-racist laws were never overturned. The SU was no different than America. Prove otherwise or you're a shill and I will mass report your ass for being one. >C-conservative Your wife's boyfriend must of been one since you enjoy treating them as a boogeyman.
>>11154 >The SU was no different than America. Prove otherwise or you're a shill and I will mass report your ass for being one. They went to war against israel.
>>11151 Starting to think the same thing. It would completely expose him as anti-White despite his pro-White facade. >>11174 And did they invade Israel? Did they wipe Israel off the map? Did they do anything substantial? No. If they were so anti-Zionist they would not have been the first country on the planet to recognize the state of Israel.
>>11191 >If they were so anti-Zionist they would not have been the first country on the planet to recognize the state of Israel. Clearly the concept of an internal elite changing over time is entirely inconceivable to judeo-Americans.
>>11069 >It was an abstract concept of putting people under a banner regardless of culture, history or even blood (race). This model was Masonic and is exactly what has been applied in the United States. There used to be two kinds of Masonic Lodges in the 18th and 19th century. The older ones with a history from before the french revolution tended to be staunchly anti-semetic, while the younger lodges founded during or after the french revolution were usually extremely philosemetic unless they were new chapters of an older lodge. This was recognized even by Hitler and was the reason why he kept the old Prussian lodges open and banned only the younger ones, until he was betrayed by Heß. >>11101 >Are you claiming that before an arbitrary date, the deep feeling of belonging and togetherness expressed by people within an Ethnos did not exist? It did exist but it wasn't called Nationalism. Before the invention of Nationalism these things were expressed with the concepts of Honor and Loyalty for ones family and kin, it is the glue that keeps tribalism together. The majority of attacks from jews against non-jews are trying to weaken and destroy those two institutions because otherwise they can't get into a group. In a society in which Honor and Loyalty towards ones kin are valued the jew cannot play his game since his non-kin status allows people to retaliate against him in full force without social backlash. The other Anon I cite further up is correct that the original concept of Nationalism declared all people of the state to be citizen of the Nation, it was closer to what we today call civic-nationalism and the reason why the Haitianische Revolution of 1791 could happen. It was later intervention by people like the Völkisch Movement who created a concept of Nationalism which was centered around ones race. This is also the reason why ethnic groups from third world shitholes often seem to be able to resist the jew much better than the western world, even if they don't have their own country. They still have the oldschool concepts that tells them that blood is thicker than water and that foreigners that act like bastards are not people for which the rules of society count.
>>11265 Nationalism was never invented. The nation-state strictly-speaking is a modern phenomena, yes, but nationalism is simply a more advanced form of the in-group preference of in the context of modern nations.
(1.62 MB 3392x2028 USSR hate speech laws.jpeg)
>>11192 >Clearly the concept of an internal elite changing over time is entirely inconceivable to judeo-Americans. The elites never changed, it seems that niggermonkeys like you cannot comprehend that you are wrong and do not hold any solid grounds to confirm this. The Soviet Union's (((elites))) were the same during the time of Stalin. They never hated jews, never tried to destroy Israel, never killed jews in masses to stop them from killing Palestinians and punish them for their betrayal. Their stance was the same as the socialists today, they do not want to kill jews they only want to stop zionism. You're repeating yourself now, meaning that you actually do not have a constructive answer to why and how the SU is totally not the same as it was during and after Lenin's and Stalin's regime. To be an enemy of the jew, one must reaffirm life and nature itself and be completely against Judaism and all of its creations. None of the cominterns were like this and the only ones who have rejected Abrahamic dribble are the NSDAP. https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/03/15/quotes-anti-racism-of-lenin-trotsky-and-stalin/ >>11276 >Nationalism was never invented. The nation-state strictly-speaking is a modern phenomena, yes, but nationalism is simply a more advanced form of the in-group preference of in the context of modern nations. This is true, we can look at the Romans and Greeks an example to all their references and prospering the people and lands of Rome and to zealously die to destroy her enemies and all that harms her. Rome was usually referred to as the collective gathering of its citizens.
>>11075 >This entire thread should be erased from existence, because every soycialist has been exposed to be a jew and anti-White. It's a useful thread to demonstrate how NB is retarded and poisonous, yet manages to hide its true end goal because it's distant both in political scope and in geographical area of influence. Moreover, every time NB is found, we find duped Whites and con men wasting White talent for what is nothing more than another anti-White garbage doctrine. >He never implied that, Sure, the WR is just the mere result of two German groups disagreeing upon being pro-emperor or liberal. That's exactly what he typed. His piece came out just as nothing more than an unsubstantiated opinion that conveniently ignores the economical context of the creation of WR, the lack of meaningful power the Germans actually had on their country, and the action of Jews to make sure the Germans would find no way out of it. > I noticed that you enjoy leaving out the work of the jew in many contributions and actions. The anon you're defending is the one guilty of this omission, not me. >>11102 >Anon never claimed that the USSR was pro-White. Oh but he's just zigzagging with his chief argument being that in the long historical breadth of this Jew-infested USSR, it might have once, as an anomaly and for a little time, shown some kind of disagreement with Israel, but no true anti-Semitism as claimed. As if it makes any difference. Why should we care that at some point it was 90% shit only instead of 100% most of the time? >>11192 The argument is not much different from looking at the Saudi who backed some armies that stood against Israel too... and therefore should be called anti-Zionist, when they're crypto kikes and have been best friends with the United States for a long time. One of the few countries that really wanted to roll onto Israel was Iraq but they got shunned by Syria so essentially Iraq gave up too. Also, fast forward to modern Russia. Who inaugurated the biggest mosque on European ground again? Putin has the face of a mischling and throws revisionists in jail.
>>11298 Yup, exactly. The Greeks are a particularly good example. They recognized themselves as a people, even if there was much internal diversity in cultural practices, dialects and the like within the label of 'Greek'. Yet they still drew a strong line between Greeks and Barbarians, and there existed Panhellenic religious sites and Panhellenic games. These sorts of attitudes are literally as fundamental as it gets for humans, along with making a distinction between family and non-family.
For those shilling for National Bolshevism on many different threads, thank you for reminding me that I had this archived. Will Vladimir Putin Save The World Part 1: https://files.catbox.moe/ag3j8s.mp4 Part 2: https://files.catbox.moe/oyspug.mp4 Part 3: https://files.catbox.moe/ovx6em.mp4 Always remember to ARCHIVE EVERYTHING!
>>11276 >Nationalism was never invented. You are wrong anon, the word Nation didn't exist before the 14th century and only slowly gained today's meany in 16th century France. What you mean is basic tribalism, but tribalism and nationalism are different.
>>11345 They’re not that different at all. Nationalism is a more complex form of tribalism with more territorial implications. The term ‘nation’ has also always implied various senses of ‘race’, ‘country’, ‘tribe’, ‘people’ ever since the time of Latin, and into old varieties of French, into Middle English and into modern languages. Don’t let Yids trick you here. Latin: >a being born, birth >A breed, stock, kind, species, race >In a more restricted sense, a race of people, nation, people (used commonly in a more limited sense than gens, and sometimes as identical with it http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=natio Old French (8th to 14th century): >birth (instance of being born) >nation https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/nacion#Old_French Middle English (12th to 16th century) >(a) A nation, people; a race of people; a political country, nationality; ~ and lede, nations and peoples; of english ~, of English nationality; (b) in pl.: country; (c) fellow countrymen; also, members of a delegation; (d) an Irish clan >(a) A class or group of people; cristen ~, Christendom; mannes (mennes) ~, the human race, mankind; ~ of bestes, the animal kingdom (excluding man); of al nacioun(es, of all types; (b) progeny, offspring, children; descendants, a generation; (c) ?family, birth; ?social class. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/dictionary/MED29003
A letter from a German soldiers in the Soviet Union. Understand that the people that support Bolshevism of any kind are not your race's allies. They are subversives. Lieutenant Otto Deissenroth, Military Post Number 12 827D writes to local group leader Kemmel in Altenau (Mainfranken). Dear Comrade Karl! I write this letter from the desolation of a Ukrainian forest village, 40 kilometers from Kiev, which we hope to capture in a few days. The fruitful land of the Ukraine is all around us, but 20 years of Bolshevist mismanagement have brought it to ruin. The poverty, misery, and filth we have seen and experienced in the past weeks is indescribable. You back home cannot imagine the terrible results of Bolshevism in this fruitful land. Everything that we formerly read in newspapers and books pales in the face of terrible reality. Our eyes look in vain for some sign of construction, for a trace of progress, for a bit of culture. We yearn for the sight of a clean house, an orderly street, a few tended gardens, a few trees! Wherever we look there is filth, decay, desolation, misery, death, and suffering! Everywhere we see the ghost of Bolshevism in the tortured look of farmers, the blank stares of captives, the hundreds of murdered people, the farm houses, desolate buildings, and ruined houses. I sometimes think it is all the work of the devil. The land was rich when it was inhabited by German, Ukrainian, Czech, and Polish farmers. Then Bolshevism came, and with it enormous misery. Everything that was prosperous or cultured was killed or burned. I spoke with dozens of people whose family members, fathers, husbands, brothers and sons perished somewhere in Murmansk, Siberia or the icy north. Thousands died during the great famine, particularly in 1932-1933. Thousands more ended up in prisons and jails. The misery of those freed from Bolshevism is indescribable. Any free expression was prohibited, any movement banned. Everything in nature that was beautiful, good, and free was destroyed. Everything created by God was exterminated! They took the blessing from the land and the soul from the people. They reduced them to the level of animals, impotent, miserable enslaved animals with no hope of life who did not know if they would be alive tomorrow, who lived from hand to mouth, and were happy only when someone killed them. Hell can be no worse that this “Soviet paradise.” There is no hope of salvation. What Bolshevism has done to humanity is a sin against God, a crime one cannot begin to understand. Every German who formerly thought Bolshevism was a worthy idea and who threatened we National Socialists with death and bloodshed only because we didn’t believe in this nonsense should be ashamed! We were right! We are all shaken and moved as we face this misery, this suffering, this hopeless Bolshevist life. They stole everything from these people except the very air they breathed. The land they inherited from their fathers became a collective, the property of the state, and they became slaves worse than those of the darkest Middle Ages in Germany. They had a tiny plot of land of their own, and even that was heavily taxed. They had to report to the collective’s commissars each morning, work the whole day, even Sunday, with no free time. They belonged to the state. They were supposedly paid, but rarely saw the money. They got 33 kopeks a day, about a third of a mark. They owned no plow, no spade, no wagon, no yoke. Everything supposedly belonged to everyone, everything belonged to the state. The Jews and party bigwigs lived in prosperity, the farmers had only hunger, misery, work, and death. No one felt himself responsible for the soil, no one felt the love we Germans have for our homeland, for soil that is ours. The knowledge of blood and soil had died out. I spoke with 30-year-olds who did not understand the concept of property. They had been educated in Soviet schools. That explains why they had no sense of culture, no need for it. Their homes are empty, cold and desolate, much poorer than in Poland. No pictures, no flowers break the desolation. The art of cooking also disappeared, given the food shortages. The daily diet consists of milk and bread, along with a bit of honey and a few potatoes. When one see this dismal poverty, one is reminded that these Bolshevist animals wanted to bring culture to us industrious, clean and creative Germans. How God has blessed us! How justified is the Führer’s claim to European leadership! The poorest German village is a pearl in comparison to these ruined Russian villages. Sometimes as I face the thousands of murdered people that we found in the cities and villages, and in the numerous occasions where we found women and children wailing over the corpses of their family members, or when they asked us to free their men who had been hauled off just before we arrived, I see the Führer before me. He saved an enslaved and raped humanity, giving it once more divine freedom and the blessi
>>11429 blessing of a worthy existence. The last and deepest reason for this war is to restore the natural and godly order. It is a battle against slavery, against Bolshevist insanity. I am proud, deeply proud, that I may fight against this Bolshevist monster, fighting once again the enemy I fought to destroy during the hard years of struggle in Germany. I am proud of the wounds I suffered during the election battles in Germany, and I am proud of my new wounds, and of the medal that I now wear. It is as if the people here are awakening from a deep sleep. They cannot yet believe in their new freedom; they do not know where to begin. They sit down and wait for orders. Now they have them: “Go back to work, harvest the fields, now you have your own home.” That is what all the posters say, and one sees the masses at work in the fields. Man and nature are free again, God has his place once more, his eternal order has been restored. We National Socialist soldiers of Adolf Hitler have restored the godly order, though some call us heathens. That is the way life is. And what did those who spoke about God do? Ask them!” In the East, 30.7.1941
>>11348 From its etymology, nation means a kin with a blood link, or near so. When the Nationalism idea came forth, it was something different, it grew in countries where Jews prospered and they did all they could to turn it into an administrative question of papers, so to speak, than one of blood. Just so that you could shove anyone under the same banner, starting with Jews being accepted as members of the "nation" actually hosting them. because these parasites always need to be accepted first. The more cosmopolitan a nation would then become the better. Look at what Hitler lamented about when he arrived in Vienna, yet he was mainly looking at Whites from varied places. He would probably fail to find the words today. >>11429 >Any free expression was prohibited, any movement banned. >They stole everything from these people except the very air they breathed. >They had a tiny plot of land of their own, and even that was heavily taxed. >The Jews and party bigwigs lived in prosperity >I spoke with 30-year-olds who did not understand the concept of property. >They had been educated in Soviet schools. That explains why they had no sense of culture, no need for it. (((Fuckers))) are totally applying a mix of Weimar and Holodomor, all rolled into one neat package called GREAT RESET.
>>11458 >they did all they could to turn it into an administrative question of papers, so to speak, than one of blood. Just so that you could shove anyone under the same banner, starting with Jews being accepted as members of the "nation" actually hosting them. This is of course civic 'nationalism' and not actual ethnonationalism, which is more in accordance with the etymology. The only real nations are ones based on blood. All others are just centralized economic zones that exist for capitalists to trade goods and swindle their wage slaves
Russian National Bolshevism has degenerated into nothing more than an internet meme but the ideology of Karl Otto Paetel is based.
>>11788 I have one of Paetel’s books, a facsimile of apparently an old German edition. I wish it was in English though. I am not too skilled in German, especially when it is in Fraktur script. Do you have anything in English?
Nazbol is based as fuck
(20.88 KB 228x320 Denied Expectations.jpg)
>>12060 No it's not
>>11317 >the ussr wasn't anti-semitic Okay. Well, no shit. You and I both know that basically no government in all of history was genuinely counter-semitic. Even Hitler's Germany failed utterly to truly counter the jews. Hitler should have actually done the Holocaust. Except effectively instead of with gas-rooms and electric floors. Just machinegun jews into a pit like any normal genocide. I've been accused of being a Nazbol, so I'll use this label to say that if that is true, not all Nazbols like the USSR. I don't think that it was an ideal system of government to aspire to. However, they did get some things right and we are allowed to learn from our enemies. >>11265 >It did exist but it wasn't called Nationalism. Okay. That is an irrelevant statement. Before 1660, the word "economy" hadn't been defined as a science. Does that mean that before 1660 there was no economy? Look, racial nationalism as a defined political movement is a "new" concept. That is because before recently, different races barely even co-habited a single country, let alone tried to exterminate each other. Sure, you had Mongols invading Russia, and Russians responded by becoming extremely xenophobic against Asiatics. But these kinds of true racial conflicts were rare and localized. Europeans colonized Africa and Africans evolved a kind of racial struggle mentality very early on. Earlier than us, in fact. But that could only exist because people instinctively recognize that there can be racial struggles. If the Romans had somehow sailed to east Asia and conquered it, the Asians as a whole probably would also have developed a kind of pan Asiatic nationalism in response to this. Nationalism is a human defense mechanism against foreign exploitation. It naturally develops. When liberals claim that it did not exist before an arbitrary date, they are being hopelessly anachronistic.
>>11150 Pretty much every post I have made contributed far more than your temper-tantrum posts do. >>11103 >>10698 >nationalism Yes. Read my posts. >private property (rights) Yes for normal people (but not things which harm the community and nation). Yes but not unlimited for corporations. No for globalist corporations. Never for media corporations... but also not government run either since that leads to corruption. >egalitarianism Women have no place in politics. Jews are a threat to the world and have proven incapable of living on the same planet with humanity. Niggers should go back to Africa... but realistically will need to be exterminated. Other races deserve the same treatment. Between White people, what exactly do you mean by egalitarianism? I am not in favour of communism. However, I am also not in favour of monarchist style aristocracy. If we do have an aristocracy, it should be based on merit with no barriers to the best rising to the top. >hierarchy See above >Marxism Marxism is a spook ideology for most people. Almost no Marxist genuinely believes in Marxism, but uses it as a tool to advance other agendas. Should Marxism become our national economic policy? No. It is unworkable.
>>11191 The truth is simply that I didn't see your post. It would literally be impossible for me to be both pro White nationalism yet also anti-nationalist. Think.
>>14379 >Niggers should go back to Africa... but realistically will need to be exterminated. Other races deserve the same treatment. Same treatment like White people (having their own country and people) or same treatment like niggers (being blowtorched till all are gone)
>>14389 You wanna know how I can smell the fact that you're a closet shitskin? Because I smell your fear. Even your anonymity won't save you now.
(660.68 KB 1078x874 Disappointment.png)
>>14389 what a retarded post
>>12060 >samefagging You are the gayest shill to exist. >>14379 >read my posts <never provides a coherent answer in any odf them >Women have no place in politics. Jews are a threat to the world and have proven incapable of living on the same planet with humanity. Niggers should go back to Africa... but realistically will need to be exterminated. Other races deserve the same treatment. This is a normalfag's view of what National Socialism or fascism is about. Anons questioned you, because you were shilling Marxist' ideals , which was the abolishment of private or familial property, wanting to kill the rich, thinking that most capitalists were White despite being the o contray. Now you're doing a 180, because you got caught being a gigantic faggot. >spooks No one says this buzzword other than Stirnertards (anarchist). You have to go back from wherever you came from.
(35.12 KB 754x502 92498429439842954.jfif)
I've been lurking this board since 8, in all its homes. Have been on 16 since it started, and can definitively say that 16/pol/ has gotten shittier and 16/fascist/ is the best place we have left online. The survival of this board is due in large part to how rock solid our BO is. All that gay shit aside, this thread needs to be removed from /fascist/ and sent to /b/. Anons have btfo this nazbol faggot, which I know is the BO's intent on keeping opposing views around. Anything nazbol retards believe in is better accomplished by National Socialism, so they come off as spergs arguing eye-rolling pedantics and wasting time/energy. Here's the real reason this thread needs to be /b/anished: This is our living space. Where the swastika is supposed to be, the faggot OP of this thread posted a hammer and sickle. He might as well have posted the star of remphan. This is equivalent to graffiti tagging another tribe's space irl. Every time these nazbol faggots bump this thread and one of us looks at the catalog, we see the enemy inside our gates. So does anyone who is just coming to /fascist/ for the first time. This isn't about safe spaces, we have none of those. This is about subconscious subversion and core principles. The question of this thread, to remove or entertain, is analogous to the solution to our racial struggle. If we defeat our enemies but keep them around and do not have the resolve to REMOVE them from our space, then we make the same fatal error that White civilizations have always made. This is where the civil war thread on /pol/ shines. The only solution is to exterminate the enemy when we come in contact with it. Period. No half measures. Everything else has been tried and failed for thousands of years. We aim to secure a better future that does not repeat previous mistakes, and we are out of time. This starts within ourselves, here and wherever we are, right now. We do not tolerate the enemy walking into our house with a subversive flag and a smile, offer them a seat and some tea, and listen to what they have to say. As a race, we have done that for thousands of years and it has lead to the extinction threat we face now. We are about to die. When faced with an obstacle or a hostile enemy, we destroy them. Why? Because we can. The only right we have is the right to struggle for survival. If we can't do that mercilessly, without exception here or irl, we are lost. No more compromise on our homeland, period. Debate this subversive thread in /b/ if you don't want to ban it, we will die as a race if we keep entertaining subversives instead or exterminating them.
(582.00 KB 1920x1080 On Understanding the Overman.jpg)
>>14421 *instead of exterminating them.
>>14421 >16/pol/ has gotten shittier It's been under intense shilling the past few weeks. One of the keywords they use is "retard", and one of their strategies is to just flood threads with low-effort posts flinging shit everywhere. I think you're right the difference is in moderation, because you need to be proactive and clean that shit up otherwise it takes over the board fast. For the couple of months before this I noticed 16/pol/ was actually getting some decent quality discussion and image/video uploads.
>>14661 this post is made either by a retard making low-effort replies calling everyone jew on pol or someone retarded enough to fall for their crying. i'm pretty sure it's the former. the faggot is bringing it over to this board as well now.
>>14661 >One of the keywords they use is "retard" It's most likely just a very spastic Tumblrina or some Jewish soyak, but it has more to do with them being shitposters than some coordinated shilling
>>14666 the difference is i was providing counterarguments whenever applicable in my posts calling them retards whereas they replied quite literally with just "ok jew." either way, this thread has already been derailed once with off-topic conversation. let's not do it again. for the poster of 14661 to complain about something as specific as getting called a retard then to concern-troll about moderation raises a red flag to me about their intentions. posts can be replied to cross-thread or even cross-board (format >>>/insertboardhere/postnumber), so please move conversation about this topic to more appropriate threads. part of board hygiene falls on regular users to respect thread topics.
>>14667 You are right, better stay on-topic. Effort-posts are a good way to discourage such behavior, regardless of reason.
>>14389 >Same treatment like White people (having their own country and people) or same treatment like niggers (being blowtorched till all are gone) If blowtorching makes you happy, I won't stop you. But behaving like a nigger will get you in trouble. >>14417 ><never provides a coherent answer in any odf them I speak plainly and answer all questions, liar. I am 100% confident in the truth of my positions. Cite a single unclear post I have ever written. >you are shilling for the abolishment of familial property Once again, you lie like a jew. I never once said that families should be deprived of their property. Only corporations and jews. The fact that you lie so often proves that you are disingenuous and not serious about your own claimed ideology.
>>14421 >All that gay shit aside, this thread needs to be removed from /fascist/ and sent to /b/. Shut up kike. Your tricks are transparent. This thread is a weapon against NazBol. It's purifying. If lefties can be lured into it, what they will read will destroy their programming.
>>14855 I'm not even a Nazbol but reading the shrill posts poorly trying to dispute Nazbol ideology makes me more sympathetic to it.
>>14860 >I'm not nazbol 1. Then you wouldn't constantly bump this thread 2.You aren't very good at lying. Refer to >>8912 >but reading the shrill posts poorly trying to dispute Nazbol ideology makes me more sympathetic to it. There are no shill posts other than your own. Anons aren't trying to subvert anything they are just calling you retarded for making jewish arguments and talking points. The janny should just ban you and stop being retarded. You literally contribute nothing to this board other than being an autistic sperg. I wouldn't be surprise if you were that Adolfstalin guy.
>>14894 >you wouldn't constantly bump this thread >everyone bumping this thread is a NazBol That is preposterously retarded. > Refer to >>8912 Yes. And I never claimed to be one. Frankly, I am not well educated on their policy proposals and upon further discussion with Nazbols whom I have sought out to pick their brains, I have discovered several things which I am opposed to. Namely, their support for collectivized property for everyone. I believe that distributionism is a far superior economic policy since collectivization has historically led to misuse of assets and stagnation. Similar to how renters usually do not improve their property and some even mistreat it. Another example of this is in farming. A farmer who owns his land is far more likely to steward his property well than someone who does not own it. In just a few sentences, I have made better arguments against National Bolshevism than literally every single shrill idiot screaming that I am one myself. >There are no shill posts other than your own. I am not the one going around screaming that anyone who disagrees with me is an ad hominem. Nothing demonstrates disingenuous people than asking me to answer a question and then ignoring my answers when you don't like them. Nor could you possibly be more shrill than screaming that the jannies need to literally Shut It Down whenever someone questions your conservative values.
>>14895 >everyone bumping this thread is a NazBol This is proof that you are a nigger. If YOU aren't nazbol, then you wouldn't have such a fixation on this thread and leave it be. That alone would prove anons here wrong that you aren't one, but you keep coming back here, because your tiny ego is fragile and you cannot stand being exposed as a dumb kike. I think this confirms that you are indeed autistic and warrant a perma ban. >just more lying BS and excuses If you never claimed to be one, then you wouldn't ask why we dislike nazbol and call it an updated version of NS. You act just like they do, they constantly ignore the facts present at them and lie about it straight in your face like retards. Hell to further prove you're dumb af, let's just look at your other posts >>9365 >>9482 >>9548
>>14898 >everyone bumping a thread is a nigger Then you are a nigger. >If YOU aren't nazbol, then you wouldn't have such a fixation on this thread and leave it be. If you were not a NazBol, why are you so fixated on this thread? >you keep coming back here Just like you. >if you weren't one, you wouldn't ask why we irrationally hate them!!!! You are the kind of cuckservative retard who would start a civil war over a word rather than fight the common enemy. You are a jewish sleeper cell in waiting, ready to sabotage genuine resistance the moment you encounter someone with a slightly different opinion on what is good for White people. >they constantly ignore the facts present at them and lie about it straight in your face like retards. Something I never once did, yet the shrill retards screaming at me do constantly. >look at these true posts which no one could even dispute except to scream SHUT IT DOWN!!!!! You claimed that this thread is a weapon against an ideology. Yet your inability to refute it only turns it into a weapon for that ideology.
>>14894 >I wouldn't be surprise if you were that Adolfstalin guy. He posts the same way as he does. He calls everyone he doesn't like jewish, despite admitting to be partially one, and loves to create fallacies while crying about the ones you supposedly made against him. If you call him out for it, then he gives (you)s the same way he did with you. He's literally retarded.
>>14860 Are you an idiot or what? Nazbol was attacked almost dead on as soon as a faggot started this thread. It totally backfired and 99% of its content is weaponized words against Nazbolismus. This thread is kept around for dumping incisive reinformation on NB and as a trophy hall. Now go back to sucking on Dugin's balls.
>>14901 >everyone bumping a thread is a nigger How is someone this retarded? You cry about a fallacy that doesn't exist and then make strawmans. >If you were not a NazBol, why are you so fixated on this thread? Hey brain-let, this is my first time posting on this thread after discovering it. I couldn't find it after we left cafe and now it is one of my very few post here. You still haven't answered my question, because you've only posted on two threads. >Just like you. I'm not talking about at the moment, you keep coming here period. >You are the kind of cuckservative retard who would start a civil war over a word rather than fight the common enemy. You are the type of moron to complain about ad hominems, but then make ones yourself. Nazbols are jews, they are enemies to all of fascism and Whites. They have never fought against a common enemy, because they only validate and work with our own. You aren't fighting anything, you're bumping a thread, because you can't stand your ego getting attacked. >You are a jewish sleeper cell in waiting, ready to sabotage genuine resistance the moment you encounter someone with a slightly different opinion on what is good for White people. This is some Q-anon mental gymnastics lol. You can't say this when you're a White knight for the Soviet Union, an anti-White state. >Something I never once did, yet the shrill retards screaming at me do constantly. <shrills Yes you did, you have done nothing, but that this entire thread. I've read all of your interactions with anons in the past and you only make stuff up and miss the point that everyone says to (((You))). >>look at these true posts which no one could even dispute except to scream SHUT IT DOWN!!!!! See? More mental gymnastics. You should be banned, because you bring nothing intelligent to this board nor thread. You constantly strawman your opponents and then lie about the history of the White race. You know who else does these type of things? The same people who work for the ADL and Mossad. >You claimed that this thread is a weapon against an ideology I did no such thing. Why are you so arrogantly naive? Were you dropped on the head or are you just looking for attention, because no one in your life given it to you? You act like that pedonigger Vaush. >>14904 >He posts the same way as he does. I don't think so, I think he had a different style of posting and was way more autistic than this shill is. All we know is that he's a shill from cuckchan and /pol/.
>>14910 > You cry about a fallacy that doesn't exist and then make strawmans. After anon said that anyone bumping a thread is a Nazbol. >this is my first time posting on this thread after discovering it. And according to >>14898, you are a nigger Nazbol. >You still haven't answered my question, because you've only posted on two threads. What question? I post because retards like you keep making shrill arguments in bad faith, so I respond to each claim and correct your lies. >you keep coming here period. People keep making jewish non-arguments. I respond with the simple truth. >complain about ad hominems >EVERYONE I DISLIKE IS A JEWWWWWW! Amazing. You are unhinged. You are literally the kind of person jews use to slander White nationalism. You are a jewish asset, and worthless to whatever cause you claim to support. If NazBol is jewish, point out what policies it proposes which are jewish. So far as I can tell, the debate is between two philosophies which both have the best interests of White people at heart, but with different economic goals. You are the one freaking out over a word and trying to start a civil war for jews when what should happen is calm discussion. >you're bumping a thread, because you can't stand your ego getting attacked. Says the shrill shill bumping a thread because his ego is threatened. I am here to discuss politics. You are here with nothing to add and are screaming non-arguments because I threaten your ego. >This is some Q-anon mental gymnastics lol. No, it is quite obvious. You are a jewish asset because you are flosing your goddamn mind and freaking out over a political disagreement. >You can't say this when you're a White knight for the Soviet Union I am not pro-USSR. However, I am also realistic about the USSR and Stalin did purge many jews. Your problem is you are such an emotional and unstable person that you cannot even conceiver of a non black and White situation. Everything must either be wholly good or wholly evil. This demonstrates that you are a newfaggot who has not been involved in the White struggle for more than a few years. Eventually, you realize that the world is more complex than your post-conservatism views. >you have done nothing, but that this entire thread. Says the person using nothing but shrill ad hominems and not providing one single actual argument against NB. >SHUT IT DOWN!!!! You argue like a jew. > you bring nothing intelligent to this board nor thread. >literally every single word in a long post is just screaming like a jew >You constantly strawman your opponents >EVERYONE WHO I DISLIKE IS A JEW >YOURE A JEW >YOURE A COMMUNIST! >YOURE A NAZBOL!!!! >I did no such thing The anon I was originally responding to did. You wrote this long post, each line screaming ad hominems at me. Yet not a single argument against NB.
>>14909 >This thread is kept around for dumping incisive reinformation on NB And yet I have not seen one good argument against it, except the one I wrote.
>>14920 >only my posts exist ITT t. sollipsist
>n-no you're the nazbol Yeah this dude is a kike. Janny you are a retard not banning this obvious shill and thread.
>>3362 Bolshevism was a construct created in test runs of jesuits when they experimented on new social models. It is a slave society.
Bumping this because we're having some posters shilling for the utopian Sino-Russian Duginist paradise.
>>14919 >If NazBol is jewish, point out what policies it proposes which are jewish. So far as I can tell, the debate is between two philosophies which both have the best interests of White people at heart, but with different economic goals. Read thread moron, then you'll know. Stop trying to reboot it like a kike.
>>18042 A reminder as to how White-friendly China is when it comes to truth that is essential to us and our collective memory: >>5250 And >>5286 >>8123
>>18060 The real question is, however, whether China would ever be willing to admit such embarrassing aspects of their prehistory. Regardless, I agree with the spirit of what you are saying. The current Chinese government is dedicated, it seems, to covering up any history that is not Han.
>>18063 >The current Chinese government is dedicated, it seems, to covering up any history that is not Han. Probably a better way to go for them internally. Nothing outside the State.
>>18069 Certainly true from their perspective for sure. Every group feels the need to ‘we wuz’ to some extent in order to foster a feeling of pride and continuity
It might be good for one thing, slowly turning a democratic or communist country into a fascist one >>3577 I've actually seen transphobic and anti-semitic nazbols, but those were on the russian side of the internet. >>3657 >What's the point of it, what is it. Left nationalism. Albeit it's not too much thought of it. Just like national anarchism
>>18689 >It might be good for one thing, slowly turning a democratic or communist country into a fascist one That really seems to be the natural progression of a so-called 'communist' state in numerous instances. Just look at North Korea.
>>18689 >It might be good for one thing, slowly turning a democratic or communist country into a fascist one The wealthy are overwhelmingly liberal and anti-White, exponentially more so in the United States. It's actually more suspicious when nationalists pop up who don't want to confiscate their assets.

Delete
Report