>Right, but Keith... than people that want what's best for our race.
Kieth is a subversive culturally, or possibly actually, Christain faggot, he is not an Irish nationalist, he doesn't want whats best for Irish people he wants to sit on his dysgenic ass and do nothing for his people but constantly counter-signal the warriors and fighters who actually seem to be the only ones making sense these days.
This is all or Nothing, it has never been anything but all or nothing!
Shitskins are OKAY you say, Why are so many of them in the cities of my country, my land, land built by and for White people?
Is that nigger down the street, who raped a White girl, okay? How about the spic who did the same the other way? how about the thousands now crossing the border violating our borders? Many of whom are undoubtedly agents of the cartels, who are very well organized, and because they are not suppressed at every turn like Whites are, have a damn good shot at ethnically cleansing half the southwest of everybody else once lawlessness occurs.
ARE THEY GOOD? ARE THEY OKAY?
The answer is no, and the ones who are back at "home" are being supported by the money the fuckers here make, in essence steal from us, and most of them actually save that money it to get here themselves through better means.
The members of our race who would join you in whining and bitching about "MUH VIOLENCE"
are, just like you, traitors.
You and everybody like you fails to see the issue that deportations aren't going to stop shit, they know where we are, they know we have better societies than they do, and they will never stop coming!
>A place for every race . . . resources of which we can just trade for.
It doesn't sound nice to me, it sounds like you want to be lazy, that you want your descendants to be lazy and to fall prey to the same shit we are now again. I do not want this, I would rather see the earth burned in atomic fire than to keep seeing this disgusting state of affairs occur again and again because the weak elements of our people refuse to do what is necessary.
We do not need to trade for resources, firstly because giving them anything in exchange for something we could simply take and kill those who complain about it, is detrimental to our people what are we giving away? Technology? Thats worked out extremely well for us so far. Medicine? the result of this is 1.4 billion chinks and Indians respectively, almost as many Arabs and nearly 4 billion niggers, all of which damage the environment in ways we have never done, sure we did some bad shit but we turned it around very soon after the damage was done, in most cases. Clothing? This one isn't bad per se, but it is pointless, Resources? we've done this and they squander it and use what we give them against us to hurt us, why would we continue doing so?
>Like I said, . . . due to the west's pathological altruism.
First, ask yourself why you think you stand against "Pathological Altruism", when you are in effect simply shilling for more of it. Also, ask yourself where it comes from, it's not natural to our people it's a symptom of a particular Abrahamic Mind Virus.
Just stopping the aid to Africa would kill billions, while at the same time killing a HUGE portion of what nature is left there, as the niggers consume everything to survive. What little technology they do have would be destroyed within 50 years if not shorter, what they can't destroy would simply wear away. Asia, is not going to keep going at all, everything China specifically does is supported by the US, when it goes, china loses most of it's economy, and it will not be able to forestall things such as the inevitable collapse of the three gorges dam, which might go this year and kill about 400-800 million or so?