/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion


[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply Return
Säge
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.


04/08/21 New logo contest is now open for the upcoming site update! Submit your entry here.
08/28/20 Come and join our Matrix/IRC servers, the info can be found here.
02/09/20 /ausneets/ has been added!
11/23/19 Donations can now be made via PayPal, thank you for all of your support!
11/21/19 We have successfully migrated to LynxChan 2.3.0, to see all of the changes to 16chan, click here.


[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(124.10 KB 600x747 zeus.jpg)
(59.14 KB 960x638 A_Russian_Hindu_girl.jpg)
(633.35 KB 718x1050 paganpilled.png)
(107.54 KB 633x624 plato abrahamic cave pagan.jpg)
Aryan Religion Thread IV Blackshirt 03/14/2021 (Sun) 18:57:15 ID:9dc13e No. 6
This thread is for White pagan religions, or more broadly, non-Abrahamic pro-White religious and philosophical discussion
(765.49 KB 1125x1250 celtic pagan list.png)
(531.22 KB 1100x1100 germanic pagan list.png)
(3.82 MB rigv (1).pdf)
(50.79 KB 500x489 indra-fighting-asura-1.jpg)
Here's the Rig-Veda
(1.09 MB 2166x1446 kurukshetra war mahabharata.jpg)
>>30 I would love to see some of this Vedic / Puranic art reproduced one day by Whites. The Rig-Veda is very explicit in describing Indra as 'golden'. His body is golden, his hair is golden, his beard is golden, his soma is golden, his visor is golden, his thunderbolt is golden, his 'car' (vimana?) is golden, etc. It said that "In Indra are set fast all forms of golden hue". Like Ukko in Finnish mythology, the bow of Indra is the rainbow as well. It clear that the real Indra would be an immensely radiant golden humanoid, much more like Thor than how he is depicted in "Hindu" art today. Even the storm gods who are companions of Indra, the Maruts, are described as beings who "shine self-luminous with ornaments and swords, with breastplates, armlets, and with wreaths" (again quoting from the Rig-Veda you attached). So much untapped potential.
>>34 They also describe The Lord Buddha as being golden specifically with his hair
(639.55 KB 1151x849 buddha blue eyes.jpg)
>>41 This would not be surprising in the slightest. I believe another one of the traditional features ascribed to him are blue eyes as well. When we take into account the fact that the Shakya are very likely descended from Scythians, this only becomes even more plausible. I believe Herodotus described the Scythians as having blue eyes and red/blond hair, and this has been echoed in many other ancient sources: https://pastebin.com/YQ7iYfKW
(945.98 KB 532x746 kalash girl india.png)
(254.60 KB KalashaReligion.pdf)
Reposting the PDF on Kalash religion.
(9.89 KB 679x81 ClipboardImage.png)
>>69 I've criticized StJ for his over-reliance on academia before, but I've gotta admit his content's not bad. Since you posted this I'm now about 40 minutes in. What is most interesting for me personally is seeing how many places throughout Germanic lands are still with names that are taken from the gods. I saw another good video from him a few days on sacred cows: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BS4D95ejpl0 Also spotted a hylic in the comment section
Does anyone have info about the Roman/Hellenic gods also being described as golden or even blue-eyed?
>>114 No, but orphic hymns state poseidon with dark hair.
>>116 I don't think Poseidon was ever a God that orginates from Indo-European cultures, but from Mesopotamia.
>>114 Apollo's hair is described as Golden as the rest of the things that associates with him and the other gods. >To Apollon >Come, O blessed Paian, O slayer of Tityos, O Phoibos, O Lykoreus, giver of riches, illustrious dweller of Memphis, O god to whom we cry “Ië,” O Titan and Pythian god, 3 yours are the golden lyre, the seeds, and the plows. Grynean, Sminthian, slayer of Python, Delphic diviner, wild, light-bringing, lovable god you are, O glorious youth. You shoot your arrows from afar, 6 you lead the Muses into dance, O holy one, you are Bacchos, Didymeus, Loxias, too, lord of Delos, you are the eye that sees all, you bring light to mortals, your hair is golden, 9 your oracular utterance is clear. Hear me with kindly heart as I pray for people. You gaze upon all the ethereal vastness, upon the rich earth you look 12 through the twilight. In the quiet darkness of a night lit with stars you see earth’s roots below, you hold the bounds of the whole world; the beginning and the end to come are yours.
>>114 Hera: >Even as when the lord of fair-haired Hera lighteneth http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0134%3Abook%3D10%3Acard%3D1 >All-powerful Hera drove these daughters in fear from the lovely halls... while still virgins, they entered the sanctuary of the purple-belted goddess, and said that their father far surpassed in wealth the golden-haired consort of holy, widely powerful Zeus.” http://lyk-kalavr.ach.sch.gr/docs/germanschool/bak_epinikoi_xi.pdf Demeter: >But golden-haired Demeter sat down and stayed there [in the temple], shunning the company of all the blessed ones [the gods]. https://chs.harvard.edu/primary-source/homeric-hymn-to-demeter-sb/ >when fair-haired Demeter amid the driving blasts of wind separates the grain from the chaff, http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0134%3Abook%3D5 Athena: >Theano took the robe and laid it upon the knees of fair-haired Athene http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0134%3Abook%3D6%3Acard%3D297 Remember too that Athena is often referred to as “Grey-Eyed Athena” or “Bright-Eyed Athena” in English. But what is the Greek word? It’s γλαυκῶπις. This word is derived from an adjective γλαυκός, which can mean any of the following: >gleaming, bright >blue-green, blue-grey >(of an eye color) light blue or gray https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/γλαυκῶπις https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/γλαυκός#Ancient_Greek Athena was a blonde-haired, blue-eyed goddess. Apollo: >So the fair speech of Cyprus echoeth around the name of Kinyras, him whom Apollo of the golden hair loved fervently https://archive.org/stream/extantodespinda00myergoog/extantodespinda00myergoog_djvu.txt Apollo is often referred to as “Phoebus Apollo” as well, and Phoebus means “pure, bright, radiant”. Hercules >First he cleared the grove of Zeus of a lion, and put its skin upon his back, hiding his yellow hair in its fearful tawny gaping jaws. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0102%3Acard%3D359 Rhadamanthus (son of Zeus) >they carried fair-haired Rhadamanthus to visit Tityus, the son of Gaea http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0136%3Abook%3D7
(161.71 KB 1305x639 the blond gods of greece.png)
(193.11 KB 1341x602 zoroastrianism.png)
>>121 Screenshotted. Also reposting the one anon's Zoroastrianism image.
>>130 This should be less blurry
(241.47 KB 1200x683 ob_69db37_image.jpeg)
What do you guys think of the annunakis?
>>136 What exactly makes them so special that has caused people to latch onto them? Is it some form of ancient alien theory? If so, it's not entirely unbelievable. They might not be aliens in the extraterrestrial sense (or they very well could be), but I do think there is something to the fact that every culture on Earth depicts such similar things and the frequent occurrence of interaction of humans with higher beings whether they came from the 'sky' or lived alongside with us on Earth. Whether they are Devas, Aesir, Anunnaki, etc there is a common core that has to be acknowledged. In fact, it is this fact present in so-called mythology and folklore along with modern sightings of certain unexplained phenomena like UFOs that are one of the best forms of evidence that ancient traditions are referring to something that is not 'metaphorical' or 'archetypal' but 'absolutely real
>>117 >Poseidon was ever a God that orginates from Indo-European cultures, but from Mesopotamia. Poseidon is definitely IE, but the Greek theogany is definitely not. The basic IE creation story would have Zeus be the father of everything. Hesiod adapted the Hurrian-Hittite creation story, with An being Uranus, Kumarabi being Cronus, and Teshub being Zeus. You can see this as both have the son of the Primordial Sky God castrating his father. Greek polytheism is unfortunately very much tainted in near-easten non-Aryan mythology.
>>139 I was wondering if there were any interesting evidence that they may have a connection to the Indo-Europeans. I always wondered if they were just foreigners who gave culture and life to the East or are White gods.
>>140 >The basic IE creation story would have Zeus be the father of everything. Struggle between different races of deities for supremacy until one race reigns supreme is common to many IE beliefs. Think of Aesir versus Vanir, Devas versus Asuras, Titans versus Olympians, etc. Neither Indra, nor Odin, nor Zeus are supreme in the creator sense, yet exercise government over the material world. Sanatana Dharma would supplement this with the fact that all of the gods ultimately emanated from Brahman / the Supreme Person, drawing on some of the oldest texts in any IE language. This would make sense to me given the Odin, Zeus and Indra are all beings with fathers in every culture, not ultimate and self-existent. I guess some Hellenic versions of this that appeared in later philosophy would be Neoplatonism and the like where everything is ultimately an emanation of the One. This is not to downplay them in the case that this is true—why would they not be respected and worshiped, for they are immensely more powerful, long-lived, knowledgable than any human and have done much for our race.
>>143 Literally this.
(45.82 KB 330x423 man golden field pagan.jpg)
>>143 Who were you meaning to reply to, anon?
>>178 That picture is the encapsulation of the feeling of transcending Abrahamism
>>136 No one knows who they are and what they represent to be honest. All we know is that they referred the Mesopotamians as a "black-headed" people. This could refer to the fact that their hair color was different from the inhabitants or maybe some cultural/racial significance between them and the commoners. The gods of the Sumer, language and culture are said to be very similar to the Indo-Europeans, so it could be possible that they were White, although I don't want to we wuz kangz, because that brings no purpose to anything other than egotism.
>>268 I have read that Sumerian is a language that we can demonstrate no other relationships with, at least when it comes to modern languages or languages attested in the past. I can't comment regarding culture because I don't really know much at all about Sumerian culture, but at least with the gods I can say that this isn't too unexpected, especially if we adopt a hypothesis that whatever they built their religions around was not entirely fictional. Unless you are referring to something in specific regarding their gods that I am not aware of.
>>274 The culture of the Sumerians is said to be inspired by a Indo-European group known as "Samarra", which is said to contain pottery very similar to the Corded Ware and Indo-European cultures. The name of itself also seems to be Indo-European alone. Concerning their gods, they are said to be blue-eyed and having some similarities with the Greek, Roman, Hindu, and Celtic goddesses of war, hunt, fertility, and wisdom. Their mythologies are also not the same as Semites who do not share such as the goddess Inanna similarities with Diana and Kali. Many of the Semetic gods come from the Sumerian, but I haven't heard any coming from the Semites themselves.
(159.18 KB 800x812 Samarra_bowl.jpg)
>>283 Forgot pic
>>284 Not gonna lie that's a pretty nice bowl.
(58.51 KB 320x320 swastika.png)
>>284 >>283 Interesting, but how do we know that the Samarra were an Indo-European group? I only ask this because their appear to have been present in the area prior to the Indo-European migrations. The swastika alone is not proof, of course, because this symbol is relatively common in cultures all over the world due to its origins in our sky. You're right about the blue eyes though. There is something going on there. This article covers aspects of the problem: https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia2/historia_humanidad103.htm Of course though, even if the Samarra were not Indo-European, they may have been very close to White if not White. We of course know that even non-Indo-Europeans can be White, just look at the Basques. Knowing what we know from the past, it is extremely likely that White-skinned blue-eyed people were far, far more common in the past.
Simply an academic study of Rodnovery I've posted before and a copy of The Lightning and the Sun.
does anyone know good videos on celtic paganism all I keep getting is stupid britsh vids and all the "sorces" they have are just roman properganda
>>454 What do you mean by Roman propaganda?
>>494 I mean all the sources they have are Roman bullshit saying the celts were human sacrificers and fags lol
>>498 >>454 I have an aversion to not trusting people like Marcus Aurelius and Ceasar on what they said about NORF FC's natives at the time to be honest.
(1.57 MB 1755x1996 wicker man.jpg)
>>498 It's entirely possible that they practiced human sacrifice of some kind. Though they are both Roman sources, there are a few mentions to the wicker man and various sorts of human sacrifices practiced by the Celts over time. Regarding the wicker man it is said that they filled it up mainly with thieves and robbers We have other reports from other groups out near the Volga how they sacrificed a young slave girl for a chief's funeral. One could just dismiss the report because it is from a Muslim, but even he reports that the girl volunteered to die. In fact, compared to the behavior we see in non-European societies, most depictions of human sacrifice by pagans seems to be rather tame.
>>500 I know both of those and they seem to be true but the shit they were saying and talking about were 10x more autistic I just want a good vid not made by britbogs and fags pls and thank you >>499 thanks for the tip anon
The Havamal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvt5jJnMruc Asha Logos' new video, not sure if it's been posted already.
An introduction to Neoplatonism. I haven’t read this yet but it seems to be an interesting book. We have first actual writings of Plotinus that are annotated, and then there follows commentary by the author which explains the text in order to make it clearer since it is quite in-depth stuff for modern people. http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=D6F42109812CED489A9D0BB32A20A1B8
(34.82 MB 1280x720 The Scythians and Their Kin.webm)
(2.25 MB 1920x1080 Screenshot..png)
(750.34 KB 1920x1080 Screenshot.png)
(1.66 MB 1920x1080 Screenshot .png)
>>873 Full playlist Subverted History: Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 1 - Setting the Stage https://www.bitchute.com/video/FBcNhNVybPS8/ https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history-part-3:1 Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 2 - The Scythians and Their Kin https://www.bitchute.com/video/QQIzzSfr3Yvm/ https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history-part-2:e Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 3 - Hellenic Greece, Troy, and the real 'Game of Thrones' https://www.bitchute.com/video/gHzDC0QvT3iR/ https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history-part-4:e Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 4 - The Germanic Peoples: A Root and its Branches https://www.bitchute.com/video/QIzCwJxMQ2Rh/ https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history-part-5:3 Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 4.2 - The Germanic Peoples: The Goths, Justice and Order https://www.bitchute.com/video/gsR5RdmuZUtq/ https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history-part-6:0 Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 4.3 - The Germanic Peoples: The End of the Goths https://www.bitchute.com/video/9NDTj4oHPHKe/ https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history-part-7:8 Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 5.1 - The Oera Linda Book https://www.bitchute.com/video/3afMkHPJwAiX/ https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history-part-8:7 Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 5.2 - The Oera Linda Book https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XujB_NhKTy4 https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history-part-9:8 Conspiracy? Our Subverted History, Part 5.3 - The Oera Linda Book https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvt5jJnMruc https://odysee.com/@ashalogos:92/conspiracy-our-subverted-history,-part:1
(197.24 KB 878x420 julian national gods.png)
>>900 Wow, he looks like it goes really deep. Can anyone vouch that this is worth watching?
>>901 >Can anyone vouch that this is worth watching? I think two of us >>873 >>900 just did :^) Gettting off topic, but I have always enjoyed Asha's work. Very well done and very carefully written to avoid jewtube censorship. Has been at it for couple years now. Couple of his older vids The War on the Masculine and Feminine https://www.bitchute.com/video/uXt7t9teAaqr/ Waking to the Lie of Globalism https://www.bitchute.com/video/c0DtgkR12XVr/ The Subverted history series is less opinion and more history. In the case of the Scythian's, it is well sourced from contemporary writers like Herodotus, Tacitus, Hippocrates, Pliny the Elder, among many others. Without a doubt is worth a watch
>>901 If your attention-span is so bad that you need an answer before watching it, yes. It's about the best amateur documentary series I have seen online.
>>907 I just watched 'The War on the Masculine and Feminine' that you linked and really enjoyed it. He was spot on about both MGTOW and feminism being both chaos ideologies designed to turn everything upside down, an inversion of natural relationships and complementary roles. If all of his work is on par with this I'm a bit upset that I never started to watch him earlier. I'll definitely have to binge some stuff here very soon now.
(1.26 MB 2124x1317 hylas and the nymphs.jpg)
This site is a reference guide to Greek mythology that some anons might find interesting: https://www.theoi.com/
The Assyrian Gods Baal Shamen and Malakbaal mirror that of the Slavic Svarog and Dahzbog a lot.
>>1226 What do you see as the biggest similarities? It’s certainly possible that they could be related in some way, or at least of the same class of beings.
Does anyone have proof or any decisive evidence that the Romans said that the North was the creation of Roman or all Indo-European culture?
>>1309 I've never heard anything like this really. What is exactly the claim, that the Romans came from the North?
>>1319 Someone claimed on the last board that the Greco-Romans had something about how all cultures of Europe originated far North of Europe. I also heard some claim that the meaning of German means brother, which is to imply that the Romans also saw the Germans as kin.
>>1322 >I also heard some claim that the meaning of German means brother, which is to imply that the Romans also saw the Germans as kin. Well this was never said on the other board, but on Twitter and maybe 8chan.
(15.19 KB 910x168 ClipboardImage.png)
>>1322 >>1323 The thing about brothers is true. The Latin noun Germānus means 'a Germanic person; member of a Germanic tribe'. There is also a homonymous adjective germānus. Exact same spelling, exact same vowel lengths, etc. This word means 'of brothers or sisters' as an adjective, or 'brother' as a noun. Now Wiktionary says that germānus should not be confused with Germānus, but I have my doubts. They have no clue about the etymology. It makes more sense to me that the Romans readily would have recognized the fact that these words were homonyms, and germānus (brother) likely gave us the word Germānus. Because this certainly isn't a name these people used for themselves. Many Germanic ethnonyms come from proto-Germanic *þiudiskaz, which gives us 'Deutsch', 'Dutch', etc.
>>1327 >This word means 'of brothers or sisters' as an adjective, or 'brother' as a noun. Now Wiktionary says that germānus should not be confused with Germānus, but I have my doubts. I don't see how there is no connection. The Romans used their own word for brother or someone of an intimate relationship and coined it as a way to describe the Northern tribes. I doubt this was, because they lacked another word to describe them considering the Ancients were all about using specific words to describe something. I think Caesar may have straight up said something about how the Britons were of kin and exactly like the Romans, although I unfortunately don't have the image that makes the claim. If true, then this only confirms that the Romans never saw that the Northeners were stupid and inferior especially when they've shat Easterns and never considered some Syrian or Ancient Levantine to be of kin to them.
>>1334 >If true, then this only confirms that the Romans never saw that the Northeners were stupid and inferior I of course cannot be said to have read everything that the Romans wrote on the Germans, but from what I remember in Tacitus' Germania, there is nothing but praise for the virtue of the German people, their racial purity (this is outright said) and their ways in general. I would have to look for the quote from Caesar, but it would not not surprise me. It's pretty funny how the words are literally identical in pronunciation but they reject this etymology for what is seemingly no good reason. It just has to come from another source! The simplest explanation is literally that they are identical in pronunciation because they are literally the same word. This isn't just some one syllable word either
(79.94 KB 800x535 romuva.jpg)
Revival of the ancient Baltic religions >In 17th, 18th and 19th century Protestant and Catholic chronicles and church documents complain of wide spread Lithuanian heathenism practice and disinterest in Christianity. In 19th most Lithuanian were nominally Christian, i.e., they had been baptized as infants. They did not readily practice their new religion, preferred to celebrate the old holidays and traditions. The church for centuries has actively advocated the destruction and removal of Lithuanian Pagan Religion elements. >The Balts were the very last European Pagans. >Many Middle Age chroniclers describe the features of the Baltic pagan religion: cremation rites; the belief in reincarnation; the veneration of holy groves, trees, fields, waters and fire; the belief in the existence of many gods and spirits; sacrificial offerings and soothsayings. >Romuva movement started its activities in 1967, was suppressed by the Soviets in 1971 and is tolerated since 1988, although attempts to restore Baltic Romuva's religion started in XIX century. >The name "Romuva" were chosen in honour of the famous Baltic Prussian sanctuary Romuva, which was destroyed by Christians. "Romuva" means "temple" or "Sanctuary" as well as "abode of inner peace". Sources from the 14th century state that in the center of Baltic lands (today Kaliningrad region), there existed Romuva sanctuary, which was revered by all Baltic nations, the eternal fire burning there spread her light and peace throughout the entire Baltic coast and even further. Beliefs >Romuva's philosophy's central idea is the sacredness of Nature, which is based on Baltic beliefs and ethnic folkloric tradition. Christianity was half accepted only in 18th-19th century. For this reason Lithuanian folklore, beliefs and customs retained the pre-Christian features to high degree even to this day. Lithuanian Baltic folklore, especially the mythological dainas, legends and the traditional way-of-life, is the basis of Lithuanian Baltic religion, Such traditional our attitudes correspond very well with the contemporal ecological and spiritual ideas. Eternity of Life, holiness of Earth and Nature, aspiration for Darna (harmony) - some of our ideas >Converted to Christianity, people were forced to ignore the Zemyna - Goddess of the holy earth and were made to honour the virgin Mary. In Christian teachings Mary was not a deity, but just an instrument of God. Looking into folk traditions and art - we can see the true essence of the Goddess. The return of the ancient Goddess is unavoidable, it is demanded by nature and peoples' conscious disposition. We begin to understand that we are the children of one Mother - people, animals, trees, plants, and that the Mother lives here, near us. Let us remember the words of M.Gimbutiene, "All that is alive - is a sign of the earth's kindness. Every earth born object is full to the brim with life's strength, granted by mother earth. Tree, flower, stone and man - all from the earth. They are all full of earth's power, although in each, the power is of various shape and form." >Romuva worships one supreme reality, which encompasses the worlds of the living and of the dead, the family and tribe, including all ancestors, all of nature, and the universe. It proclaims no eternal hell, no damnation, nor eternal salvation -- only the continuity of life in the presence of divinity. It accepts all genuine spiritual paths. Each soul is free to find its own way, Whiter by devotion, meditation or service to society. Festivals, pilgrimage, chanting of holy hymns (dainas) and home worship are most valued dynamic practices.
(147.41 KB 750x612 romuva 2.jpg)
Darna = Dharma >The idea of Darna (harmony) lies in origins of Baltic culture. The rule of darna harmony will lead to change and growth. Morality is the most important ideal of nature and man and is attained and maintained through persistent effort. Darna - the rule of harmony has always been of significance in the ancient faith. Man lives and the world exists due to harmonious interactions rudimentary to life and through man's own correct and moral behavior. Such differing pairs like light - darkness, fire - water, man - woman and others, do not necessarily imply a good - evil relationship. These opposite pairs are not static. They not only interact but also change and grow. From the human standpoint, there are neither absolutely good nor absolutely evil gods or goddesses. Goodness is born from interaction of differing but not of hostile forces, with man's interactive participation. Blogis - Evil is harmony's downfall, the absence or inability to restore harmony. This is most evident in nature's devastation, man's activity against nature and her order. The communities of man and nature and of family and community bear the fruit or create dora (morality) and darna (harmony). Darna is the most important nature's and man's ideals, attained and maintained with constant work and toil. Darna is not a steady and unchanging happiness, good fortune. It depends heavily on the efforts and concerns of man and his Gods. Baltic Darna - harmony is very close to the Hindu Dharma - the principle moral order of the world. https://www.infinityfoundation.com/mandala/h_es/h_es_trink_j_baltic_frameset.htm https://archive.fo/RnlZk
Happy Easter, anons. Hail Ostara!
(203.50 KB 1024x768 divorces.jpg)
(116.60 KB 898x701 girls-welcome-refugees.jpg)
(10.27 KB 275x183 refugee-girl.jpg)
(114.81 KB 955x500 refugees-1.jpg)
(1.08 MB 800x5618 single_mothers.png)
>>907 >The War on the Masculine and Feminine I had posted about this on 16pol, but their aDmiN banned it, so here it goes >"we cannot ask ourselves whether 'woman' is superior or inferior to 'man' any more than we can ask ourselves whether water is superior or inferior to fire... there can be no doubt that a woman who is perfectly woman is superior to a man who is imperfectly man, just as a farmer who is faithful to his land and performs his work perfectly is superior to a king who cannot do his own work." >says that comparing men and women is like comparing fire and water <proceeds to compare men and women >what nature tells us? hypergamy >nature informs us that creation is the ultimate goal, self propagation, recreating ourselves into new and sligthely different forms. any species that turns its back on this universal law, commits suicide by so doing, and proves itself unworthy of continued existence. *our age has been indoctrined into denying this aspect of our true nature...* true, and women have been very active on helping with that. they are the ones starting almost all divorces, raising their dauthers to be entitled bitches, putting their children on hormonal blockers and adhd meds, welcoming 'refugees' >men viewed this mysterious feminine nature with great awe and respect. simps viewed this mysterious feminine nature with great awe and respect.
>>1587 >t. angry incel Guess shouldn't be surprising, your reading comprehension is that of a 9th grader. >we cannot ask ourselves whether 'woman' is superior or inferior to 'man' Doesn't imply there is no difference between men and women nor that the differences can't be compared. Good luck saving the White race with your faggot boyfriend, shithead >aDmiN banned it Based. D/C mgtow is jewish, kys faggot
>>1587 Women are acting how they are because they are not following their natural role. Their natural role is in the domestic and child-rearing spheres, among a few others, but these are their primary places. Ancient Indo-European texts and historical information are unequivocal in this domain. Men are superior in a sense, but the role of the female is 100% necessary to the survival of our people. I hate whores, feminists and sluts. Not really women in a broad sense.
For anyone into the greco-roman I recommend Friedrich Nietzsche's Birth of a Tragedy. It's a personal favorite, although most of the ideas in it are probably not the ones NS would adapt from the author. http://www.russoeconomics.altervista.org/Nietzsche.pdf
(99.47 KB 854x480 asha-men-women-water-fire.jpg)
>>1593 >t. angry incel <hardcore projection >Doesn't imply there is no difference between men and women nor that the differences can't be compared. it literally mentions that comparing men and women is like comparing water and fire. >Good luck saving the White race with your faggot boyfriend, shithead <not having arguments >Guess shouldn't be surprising, your reading comprehension is that of a 9th grader. of course, because cursing and banning statistics are very adult things to do. >Based. D/C mgtow is jewish based for what? my post is not mgtow. >>1593 >Women are acting how they are because they are not following their natural role. Their natural role is in the domestic and child-rearing spheres, among a few others, but these are their primary places. Ancient Indo-European texts and historical information are unequivocal in this domain. 100% agreed. that's what the statistics demonstrate, women are not following their natural role. and as a coping mechanism they manifest their instincts by welcoming "refugees". >Men are superior in a sense, but the role of the female is 100% necessary to the survival of our people. also 100% agreed. >I hate whores, feminists and sluts. Not really women in a broad sense. I hate no women, except jewesses of course.
>>1648 What you say is true but of course men are not following their natural role either. Weak or absent fathers, inter-marriage with asians and hispanics, BLM advocacy, the list goes on.
(143.67 KB 1189x1428 b2b39d9d5a880750869d1b42907f446d.jpg)
I don't know much about women but I like pumping hot loads in their bums and sometimes they're cute I guess. So I can't really hate them
(23.63 KB 399x388 disgusting pepe.jpg)
>>1734 >in their bums Nature made you a hole to use, and you neglect it.
>>70 Pretty sure i saw some info that STJ is a jew. let me check.
>>1738 He has some shady connections, but I have never seen him called a jew
>>1327 The Latin 'Germanus' coming from Proto-Germanic 'Germanniz' (spearmen) is certainly plausible, but only a German-speaking Roman would've made that connection while every Roman would make the 'sibling' one. >>1738 Probably something by an angry Vargfan. STJ is our guy .
>>1741 >Proto-Germanic 'Germanniz' (spearmen) Hmm, the only issue with this is that the proto-Germanic word for spear is reconstructed as ‘*gaizaz’. We do have descendents of that in some languages such as Old English gār, German Ger and Norse geirr. The real question is whether the Proto-Germanic *z sound had shifted to ‘r’ yet in the time of the Roman Empire. Looking at runic inscriptions it’s hard to say. We do have some attested 2nd century and 4th century inscriptions which still have the *z sound. If it’s true that this sound hadn’t changed to ‘r’ by this time it’s unlikely to me that it is a Germanic borrowing, but it’s definitely an interesting and somewhat hypothesis that I can’t outright debunk. I am surprised I’ve never heard this.
>>1739 >>1741 No it's his connections to Dave Martel, an italian larping as a Teutonic pagan and running the reborn Norroena society which has always sought to syncretize Christainity and Germanic pagan beliefs and Boaz Villalonga who is a jew.
>>1741 >STJ is our guy You're a fucking shill, look at my post >>1716 he isn't "our guy" he's a kike who larps as a pagan. It is evident considering he admited that he used to be a marxist and has suspicious connections with his wife who seems to be a jewess.
>>1716 >>1744 Your link doesn't load. So he was a leftist as a teen? STJ is English and his wife is Swedish, both seem to be from families of protectant priests. He pretends to be normie, but he used to frequent NS-Pagan discord servers and I've seen no evidence to him changing his views.
>>1743 How does David Martel syncretize Christianity and Norse Paganism? I watched a bit from him in the past and I’ve never detected anything like this. >>1744 I have seen no proof that STJ or his wife are jewish. What I *have* seen though is proof that his wife used to hang around with a bunch on non-Whites when she was younger and acted / looked a bit trashy. There also seems to be some Zionist Christians in her family. Some also take issue with how STJ was married in a church. Despite this his content’s not had. I take it with a grain of salt since he loves genetics-faggotry so much, but he’s doing good work in general.
(354.22 KB 1440x2560 Screenshot_20210405-234124.png)
>>1747 The links works on my machine. >STJ is English and his wife is Swedish, That's something he and she claims, but there was straight up evidence that his wife is a jew, considering she was talk with a fellow jew about a visit in Israel or something. >He pretends to be normie This is obviously SP with shilling of this faggot. Pretending to be a normalfaggot is we like to call optics cucking. He isn't le based and redpilled, he's just a materialist who tries to use modern science thinking he's defending Europe. You and STJ and primary examples of people who think DNA will end the jew or something when it serves no purpose at all. The dude is an e-celeb and his dna test have no meaning other than him trying to appease the jew by not being a radical. >>1748 >I have seen no proof that STJ or his wife are jewish We had proof on the last board, so maybe you missed it or lying. It seemed on she facebook she was talking from Israel itself, which sets a major redflag. Also your wife shouldn't be hanging out with non-Whites in the first place. Why is this acceptable to you? >but he’s doing good work in general You mean shilling his jewtube channel and larping as a pagan? Speaking agaisnt narratives that NS believed? He's just another e-celeb with a suspicious background. This is like the 50th time fascist fell for faggots who can't be trusted. When are we not going to be gullible?
Is Varg the greatest boogeyman to exist considering he rents free in SP and every faggots head on Earth?
>>1752 >We had proof on the last board, so maybe you missed it or lying. >It seemed on she facebook she was talking from Israel itself, which sets a major redflag. Also your wife shouldn't be hanging out with non-Whites in the first place. I have no proof for this claim, but I’m literally the one who posted the proof from the last board. I’ve seen it all, and it certainly calls into question many things. This said, none of it proved that either of them were jewish. Plently of Zionist Christcucks visit Israel, so in itself it isn’t proof that any of them are jews. I’m not trying to excuse any of this behavior here. Hanging out with non-Whites is a problem, especially for a woman. Many of the old kikebook photos were very trashy as well in my opinion. >You mean shilling his jewtube channel and larping as a pagan? Is he LARPing though? I honestly don’t know what his view on the nature of the gods is. I have heard him talk about Evola a few times, as well as Guénon. He’s some form of Traditionalist as far as I can tell. I’m genuinely ignorant here so I’d be interested to hear what you know, especially if you have proof. >Speaking agaisnt narratives that NS believed? If you’re referring to the pic you attached, what he is saying is just stupid. I get what he is saying, but it really doesn’t work in practice. Diversity of any variety naturally implies inequality, and comparison of two beings becomes more and more feasible the closer two beings are. It’s hard to compare the superiority or inferiority of a bee versus a tree, for example, they are quite different beings, though my hunch leans towards a bee. With men and women, or between Whites and non-Whites comparison is quite easily done, and Whites and men come out on top, of course. >He's just another e-celeb with a suspicious background Yes. But I have found his videos are interesting starting points for further digging and inquiry, given that he sources himself. I’m not talking about genetics-faggotry either, I’m talking about old stories and comparisons between traditions.
>>1748 >I’ve never detected anything like this. I don't care what you've detercted or not, and i didn't say he did necessarily only that he runs the Norroena society 2.0 which does little to distance itself from the blatantly Christian syncretist past of it's membership, I took one look at one of their translations of the poetic eddas and it was so arrogantly pro-Christian, i almost puked, he also quite literally shill Boaz Villalonga, who is a jew.
>>1759 >I took one look at one of their translations of the poetic eddas and it was so arrogantly pro-Christian In what sense?
>>1760 see for yourself
>>1757 >who posted the proof from the last board. I’ve seen it all, and it certainly calls into question many things. This said, none of it proved that either of them were jewish. No you weren't, because the guy who posted it was a Varg nigger. I doubt you've seen anything, because the post on the /fash/ was pretty decisive enough to prove that he fucked not only a Paki, but a jew as well. >Is he LARPing though? Yes he is, he refers himself as a pagan, but doesn't really understand it outside of modern science and references. He advocates dumb shit like "sleeping like a pagan" or something of the sort. He's a larper for sure, considering he lives nothing like a pagan.
>>1762 Honestly I don't see what is particularly 'Christian' about this translation. It merely appears like the authors tried to replicate the poetry of the original Norse text, which leads to the marked and poetic word ordering. The thou / thee stuff isn't necessarily bad either, because it can help one distinguish between whether the pronouns in the original were second person singular or plural, since the distinction is blurred in modern English, unless one were to write "y'all" or "you guys", which would sound out of place in a text like this. Unless I am completely missing some obvious fact here. You are likely more acquainted with the Eddas than I am. >>1763 >Yes he is, he refers himself as a pagan, but doesn't really understand it outside of modern science and references. He advocates dumb shit like "sleeping like a pagan" or something of the sort. He's a larper for sure, considering he lives nothing like a pagan. It's definitely true that it's not a good sign that I can't even tell how serious he is or what he really believes. He never really talks on it, or if he does I don't watch those videos. I watch maybe a video or two of his every few months
(737.60 KB 1276x696 stj 5.png)
(79.79 KB 518x549 stj 1.png)
(98.73 KB 518x560 stj 2.png)
(83.70 KB 518x544 stj 3.png)
(544.55 KB 878x616 stj 4.png)
Reposting STJ info
(722.14 KB 814x606 stj 6.png)
>>1774 Visiting from Tel Aviv is a red-flag and may just confirm she is indeed a jew, considering no one but them are allowed to visit any part of Israel, unless there maybe certain exceptions that I don't know about. I'm always seeing supposed right-wingers and fascists having relationships with jewesses or connections with an Israeli period. I don't know whether it's because they're indeed subversive or do it out of fear that if they don't have a jew to hide behind they will get canceled turned into a scapegoat like all the other who refused to join their narratives. I never liked STJ, because he shills paganism as if it's a movement or some sort. It's even dumber to think that you're stopping anti-White narratives by actively involving yourself in science that can still be easily manipulated and is in the hands of kikes within American Universities.
>>1782 >considering no one but them are allowed to visit any part of Israel, People can visit Israel as tourists fairly easily as far as I know, but what people have to be careful about are certain types of jews there. They will harass you and sperg out if they find out you are a goy. I've seen videos of inbred-looking jewish youths harassing Israeli tourists.
>>1783 >harassing Israeli tourists. *tourists in Israel
>>1782 A whole lot of christians go to Israel as free labor. You can criticize StJ on his Haploautism and Patreon-shilling, but his videos on ancient history are very good. Calling him a jew is just retarded.
(8.79 MB 776x432 jews slaves torah.mp4)
>>1787 >A whole lot of christians go to Israel as free labor. Kek you can't make this shit up
>>1787 >A whole lot of christians go to Israel as free labor. Ok that doesn't cancel the suspicion off of her. >but his videos on ancient history are very good. Not really or at all. >Calling him a jew is just retarded. I called his wife a jew, so you're the only one being retarded here. But continue to suck off your favorite e-celeb, SP it's getting quite pathetic.
Also I don't trust anyone who proclaims to be "pro-European", but refuses to be a racialist and supremacist in any way or form. If you want to repeat the same stupid mistakes that every imageboard autist makes, then that's your procative. Just don't come here shilling jewtube videos on here like a retard and using normalfag words such as "normie".
>>1791 Isn't it more likely that she comes from a family of Ziocucked Christians rather than themselves being full-blooded jews? I'm not saying that this is excusable, but the evidence for her family being ethnically jewish is next to nothing, especially when the Facebook comments talk about them visiting Bethlehem and the Church of the Nativity. STJ is an admitted racemixer though too, someone post the discord screenshot
>>1793 >Isn't it more likely that she comes from a family of Ziocucked Christians rather than themselves being full-blooded jews? Ziocucked Christians are usually part jewish themselves, because many of the pro-Israel boomers are proudly partially jewish, which is why they love Israel more than America. Even if she isn't a kike, which is the point you're all missing, it doesn't make anything better for him marrying a zionist who visits Israel and hangs around non-Whites. Calling yourself a pagan, but marrying someone who's spiritually a jew is not only retarded, but raise all suspicion on you to infiltrate our circle which that retard SP never seems to comprehend. STJ has already shown that he believes mankind are all the same and willing to validate jewish science even if it is willing to destroy the truth that Whites are indeed better than other non-Whites and what the Greco-Romans/Aryans thought of those who are damned (shit-skins, non-Aryans). There is no way in hell I can trust or believe anyone like him. Varg is an idiot and annoying as hell, but at least he has children, isn't fucking non-White females, marries a zionist and then talk and acts like a retarded shitlib. I generally cannot stand e-celebs.
>>1797 >Even if she isn't a kike, which is the point you're all missing, it doesn't make anything better for him marrying a zionist who visits Israel and hangs around non-Whites Of course not, I've never tried to excuse this fact about STJ. There's photo evidence and everything. I was merely wondering if there is enough evidence to call her a jew in the blood sense. Of course in the spiritual sense it appears that his wife's family is spiritually jewish, and likely his wife himself is / was. And I completely agree with when it comes to relying on genetics put out by literal kikes like (((David Reich))) to say anything substantial or trustworthy about the history of our people. This is not the best approach to take, as we all know. Varg was in the right to expose STJ and call him out for being a degenerate. Varg at the very least is practicing what he preaches to a T, even if I find his paganism a bit dubious and his solutions a bit misguided.
>>1733 >Weak or absent fathers helloooooo??? who starts 80% of the divorces?? >inter-marriage with asians and hispanics true, these ones are disgusting. >BLM advocacy, the list goes on. what proportion of them advocate this? > What you say is true but of course men are not following their natural role either. totally true. men should never have let cucks, cowards and women have legal status. the greeks were totally right in not allowing these people to be citizens.
>>1887 >helloooooo??? who starts 80% of the divorces?? His point being, part of the reason women start 80% of divorces is due to weak/absent fathers
https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/04/02/are-iranians-White/ >Iran has the highest number of nose surgeries on earth (which isn’t a good thing, Iranians should be happy with their Iranian noses). >Western Iranic elites initially may have had increased European ancestry, due to the caste-based nature of Indo-European society, but were probably no more than half European. I'm convinced this dude is becoming more of a liberal.
>>2093 I’ve felt the same. It was disappointing in particular to see him slide into David Reich’s genetics-faggotry and do stuff like claim that modern Italians = ancient Romans. I suspect that he posts here so if he does he’ll be sperging out before long ITT. >but were probably no more than half European. Claim asserted without evidence. The fact that millennia after Aryans arrived in Iran there are still numbers of Iranians wity Aryan pheotype shows that there were probably tons of Whites living there in ancient times, not loads of half-breeds.
>>1889 Think about how hilariously wrong that is when kike society abducts children and fervently brainwashes their minds just so that they may be hostile to their parents, race, tradition and loyal to the sick jewish propaganda filth instructed. Now in video related is not in entirety be such a bad thing as it's made out to be because it can be used for ultimate good or ultimate evil however it's a tool to be regarded with much importance and protected, a crack that jews noticed and so one of their first goals were to corrupt the educational institutions. Modern education is completely disastrous for the health and mental fitness of young White people.
>>2119 >It was disappointing in particular to see him slide into (((David Reich)))’s genetics-faggotry I don't understand how he isn't suspicious of David Reich and never talked about some of the dumb shit he says about how we all come from Africa and that there is no such thing as purity. He is also willing to take any DNA test that comes from American labs and try to spin it as a truth, because it supposedly stop anti-Whiteness, but fails to recognize that the DNA tests are still in the hand of the jew and can be easily overwritten. DNA doesn't even tell you the whole or most of the story of what transpired during events and ages, nor does it confirm anything other than there was supposedly a people buried in a grave and scientist give their estimate number of a historical date, which isn't accurate either. What's even worse is that he is willing to attack and deny Nordicism just to protect and unite us with the medcucks. When is this faggot gonna realize that modern science can't save us and the only tests that matter are the ones that come out of fascist labs?
>>2130 It's honestly so strange to me why there are so many people who just unquestioningly accept this information from David Reich and his buddies. These are the same institutions pushing critical race theory and other forms of cultural Marxism onto young minds, yet we are supposed to think that they are wholly objective in this one particular domain? There is an absolute wealth of writings available from ancient Europeans that seems to paint a very different picture of the past, but so many people StJ and Thuletide seem to throw a lot of it away in favor of this nonsense. Like you I don't trust any sort of datings of these things either. Carbon dating is very inaccurate from the little research I've done myself as well. I'm honestly at the point where I have almost zero faith in what (((science))) tells us, and will not change my views on a matter unless I can observe it and test it out myself, which, most of the time unfortunately, is not possible, but I think that this a far more honest view of things rather than spouting factoids from jews and claiming that their data and picture given of the European past is the truth. Attacking Nordicism too is a bad look, especially in the light of the ample evidence in favor of at least a soft version of it.
Is monotheism necessarily a subversive force? Many pagans seem to believe this, but they don't seem to tackle the philosophy regarding this and what their ancestors have written. The true subversive monotheism is monotheism which banishes all gods from existence other than God, and castigates all others as demons. Meanwhile it is clear from looking into what both Greeks and Hindus speculated on in ancient times (very ancient times, far before jewish influence) that many -at least among the more philosophical - considered there to be one supreme being / principle and a host of deities created subordinate to him
>>2229 >Is monotheism necessarily a subversive force? Yes. >Many pagans seem to believe this, but they don't seem to tackle the philosophy regarding this and what their ancestors have written. The true subversive monotheism is monotheism which banishes all gods from existence other than God, and castigates all others as demons. This is all monotheism >Meanwhile it is clear from looking into what both Greeks and Hindus speculated on in ancient times (very ancient times, far before jewish influence) that many -at least among the more philosophical - considered there to be one supreme being / principle and a host of deities created subordinate to him. This is not monotheism, this is the logical discovery of the Supreme Godhead/First Cause(or First Causes we do not know how much was changed in Aristotles works by christkikes over several thousand years of having their hands on it) believe in this thing all you want, silent though it may be, but to acknowledge the existence of other gods you are by definition NOT A MONOTHEIST, how do people not get this?
>>2246 Monotheism and polytheism are kiked terms which do not overlap in the slightest despite the similarity in names. Fundamentally the type of deity that would fall under the label of monotheism is different in every way from beings like Zeus, Thor, Odin, Indra, etc, in that this deity is described as a necessary being who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent. I do not say this to denigrate these gods, but Zeus, Thor, Odin, Indra, etc. are not any of these. They were born at a point, can likely die according to many myths or prophecies, and are not omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, etc. The reason to think that these terms are in any way mutually exclusive is to make a massive category error. It is due to the terms that this happens. The existence of the Supreme Godhead / First Cause can be reasoned to and sustained philosophically, while the other gods cannot (just like any contingent entity), and this alone shows that they are two fundamentally different types of beings—note that I am *not* denying these beings or saying that they are not worthy of worship or devotion. >we do not know how much was changed in Aristotles works by christkikes over several thousand years of having their hands on it We can be reasonable certain with comparison to non-European philosophies and scriptures that there wasn’t too much tampering, as in India since the very beginning (i.e. when it was still White) they spoke of Brahman as the absolute / ultimate reality, the material, efficient, formal and final cause of everything. And yes I am the same poster as the Tor poster.
>>2229 There being a supreme being/origin is not strictly monotheistic. Hell Christianity sure as hell not monotheistic. I think the Trinity, angels, and demons are proof of this.
>>2515 I don’t think angels or demons count against Christianity’s claims to monotheism much, but the trinity always gives me a good laugh. Christians are schizophrenic, alternating between tritheism and monotheism depending on the situation. The entire doctrine is a mangled version of Plotinus’ One, intellect and soul
>>2515 >Hell Christianity sure as hell not monotheistic. I think the Trinity, angels, and demons are proof of this. No that's not what Christians believe nor how it works out. The trinity is the idea that God is one person who plays three distinctive persons who are all of the same substance meaning they would still worship the same God. Angels are the servants of God created from his will/nature to bring upon his faith and image on the universe, while the demons are simply the rejection and opposition of God. The existence of monotheism is about the worship of one God, merely believing in Angels and Demons doesn't mean you believe in other deities for they aren't deities at all.
>>2609 >No that's not what Christians believe nor how it works out. The trinity is the idea that God is one person who plays three distinctive persons who are all of the same substance meaning they would still worship the same God Which is still hypocritical and quite dumb, because they are clearly showing they believe in different persons. >Angels are the servants of God created from his will/nature to bring upon his faith and image on the universe, while the demons are simply the rejection and opposition of God. And those they call demons are non-abrahamic/goy deities, technically they are acknowledging that they are deities as well, but plaster over a lie that they are evil and demonic, even though not all demons are always evil.
>>2610 >Which is still hypocritical and quite dumb, because they are clearly showing they believe in different persons. It's dumb, but not hypocritical. They are still worshiping the same essence/nature of the God. Gods are not worshipped for being different persons for they aren't just persons, but all have different natures and spirits as well. The worship of Jesus and God himself isn't like worshipping Zeus and Apollo. >And those they call demons are non-abrahamic/goy deities, technically they are acknowledging that they are deities as well, They aren't acknowledging them as deities, but as servants of satan or goys as you say. Romans saw the non-Latin/Roman Gods as useless and inferior to their own, but they still acknowledge them to have existed and contain different natures and roles within life. Christians do not acknowledge any divine nature within Odin at all and cannot see him as a God.
Also question, why did mythologies personify the Sun as a woman Sól/Sunna, Saulė, Amaterasu) and the moon as a male? Does this contradict the idea that light is masculine and darkness is feminine?
>>2610 The big mistake the Abrahamist makes is denouncing everything other than God / angels as evil and not worthy of respect. This is what is truly radical about Abrahamism. In English unfortunately it’s difficult to see the real distinction Abrahamists are making here due to the word “god” being used in either case. The gods of Europe are essentially equivalent to Hindu devas as a class of entities. Unlike in English and many modern European languages, they’ve always been able to distinguish between devas and God, which is often given terms like Iśvara, Brahman, etc. The confusion simply doesn’t even arise. The Abrahamist identifies his Semitic volcano demon with this Brahman, a quite dubious claim, and demands of it exclusive worship. We should remember that in the OT the jealous Yahweh demanded of the jews exclusive obedience because he was “jealous”. The jews make a false identification and topple the entire hierarchical Natural Order flowing from the top-down, knocking out anything between man and highest principle / God or whatever you want to call it. This is of course subversive.
>>2612 >They are still worshiping the same essence/nature of the God. Gods are not worshipped for being different persons for they aren't just persons, but all have different natures and spirits as well. The bigger issue is that the doctrine is just incoherent. It has been defined in such a way that any attempt to understand it has been labeled heretical at some point, and most attempts to rationalize it are derided as either some form of tritheism or modalism. Anyone who hasn’t been brainwashed into trinitarianism will be hard-pressed to even find justification for it in the Bible either. All Arians, Adoptionists, etc. were stamped out and these retarded 2deep4u doctrines adopted. >>2613 Other cultures, including Indo-European ones, are of course also known to have sun gods and moon goddesses. The real question is which one is the oldest interpretation.
>>2614 >The big mistake the Abrahamist makes is denouncing everything other than God / angels as evil and not worthy of respect. This is what is truly radical about Abrahamism. I saw this telegram group that's so pro-christ to the point where they think "all other religions are shit and shouldn't be respected". And then they go on to say how Chinamen, Japanese and other non-Whites are the "anti-christ" who should be exterminated. You believe this shit? >inb4 based To say that only your religion is THE religion is kike-ish, no?
>>2613 >Also question, why did mythologies personify the Sun as a woman Sól/Sunna, Saulė, Amaterasu) and the moon as a male? The sun and the moon both have masculine and feminine characteristics and either one can be seen as male or female. The sun being personified as a woman does not contradict the idea that light and fire are masculine energies/symbols.
>>2626 >You believe this shit? I don’t see how you’d think that I’m saying anything like this. >To say that only your religion is THE religion is kike-ish, no? It depends. There has to be some reference to truth. The real question is whether a single way can have a monopoly on truth, or whether there is a single way to respond to truth. The Abrahamist says there pretty much is. The pagan will (if he is serious) say that there is a clear distinction between truth and untruth, but that there is a greater deal of flexibility and natural diversity in how this is responded to. This shouldn’t be construed with complete relativism though. Not everything is just permissable, but neither does everyone who has a slightly different idea needs to be eradicated. Some types would be better off being eradicated though. Christians, jews, Muslims, Wiccans, most atheists, etc
>>291 Late to reply but there is an interesting site that connects the Sumerian language with European ones. https://new-indology.blogspot.com/2015/05/sumerian-and-indo-european-surprising.html?m=1 Borrowing words along with the blue eyed brings me to the conclusion that Samarra was European or partly and the rulers of Sumeria were also Aryans.
>>2636 Hmm, there's actually a little more collected here than I thought there would be. If this is true it would definitely show that some sort of language like PIE or closely related to it influenced Sumerian in some way or another. Sumerian itself is clearly unrelated to any living Indo-European language, but that of course says nothing about their race, of course. There are Whites who speak non-Indo-European languages, needless to say, such as Caucasian languages, Basque, Finnish, Hungarian, etc.
>>2646 I like the Jayanta = Thor equation. I was skeptical at first, but the more I thought about it the better it seemed to me. Thor is clearly not the king of the gods. He is the son of the king of the gods. Unless we are to assume that the pantheon is just totally fluid and that pagans make shit up constantly, there is the inexplicable question of why Thor was demoted from being king of the gods, and made the son of the king of the gods. In every other Aryan pantheon, the king of the gods never lost his spot. Jupiter, Zeus, Perun, Indra, etc. Thor is a storm deity. Sanatana Dharma has Indra surrounded by tons of storm deities called Maruts, as well as sons like Jayanta. Interestingly Jayanta is said to have transformed for a time into a raven / crow in the Ramayana. I cannot help but think there might a connection with Odin's ravens here.
>>2646 He also equates Odin as Agni. I don't know much about Agni, but can anyone else see the similarities? I'm having a hard time as see them as the Romans supposedly Odin as Mercury.
Arya Akasha is an absolute meme, and I have yet to see one equation of deities between traditions from him that is not spurious or stretching things in the extreme. I almost wonder what his real goal is. Daily reminder that this is who you're reading: >We often hear people attack Hinduism as being ‘impure’ from an Indo-European perspective – purportedly hopelessly “compromised” via incorporations of all manner of non-IE customs and cults. >Perhaps it is quite literally racism – because we so often hear people drawing from some 19th/early 20th century books to talk about “race-mixing” prohibitions in ancient legal codes that then ‘fail’ producing the purported “decline” of India past that point (Which is fairly blatantly untrue, historically speaking, but another matter for another time); although I am not sure that that sort of ‘morality play’ approach can be really at the root of it either – as the Hittites quite famously mixed and integrated with various non-Hittite and not even Indo-European groups, and built a great empire in the process of it. Indeed, it was literally central to their approach! https://aryaakasha.com/2020/11/22/of-hittites-and-hindus-and-their-respective-differing-receptions-amidst-some/ > I shall say one thing. I am no fan of Neo-Nazis, and have regularly found that some of the most obstinate and ridiculous of outright *intentional* distorters and perverters of our area of expertise here at Arya Akasha and #NAS, have come from within their ranks. >I therefore am not penning this in order to attempt to defend (Neo-)Nazi utilization of Runes, any more than I – a pious Hindu – would be especially keen upon Neo-Nazi co-option of any of our symbols, such as the Swastika, or even the very word “Aryan”. https://aryaakasha.com/2019/05/23/man-cannot-ban-what-man-did-not-create-on-swedens-proposed-rune-ban/ He's an anti-White subverter.
(872.90 KB 1067x665 ClipboardImage.png)
(22.03 KB 483x277 ClipboardImage.png)
(17.32 KB 483x214 ClipboardImage.png)
(1.04 MB 1480x790 ClipboardImage.png)
(506.80 KB 1434x826 ClipboardImage.png)
Curwen Ares Rolinson, the primary author of Arya Akasha
>>2665 Those rat ears give it away big time. Just another inbred jew liar making up bullshit as usual.
>>2665 Where does this faggot live, exactly?
(561.49 KB 532x536 ClipboardImage.png)
>>2667 New Zealand. There's a comment saying "It's a Swedish nose, not a jewish nose!" from one of his buddies too, I'll have to dig it up again
>>2668 >New Zealand. Shame Tarrant did put him on his hit list.
(449.02 KB 1291x878 ClipboardImage.png)
Here's the comment I was talking about. >>2669 I was going to dig for what he said about Christchurch but got tired of going through photos. I'll have to find it now that I'm at it again.
Apparently he's a Muslim apologist too, kek >What I *am* saying, is that – as applies the New Zealand experience today, especially – “terrorism has no [intrinsic] religion”. >It is “political” violence, sought to be amplified through media, to push whatever abys(m)al agenda could not be attained through reasoned discourse. >If you’re from any of the various tendencies out there which have previously sought to suggest that it’s “only” a “Muslim issue” [which flies flat in the face of the fact that, for a start, the previous incident of international terrorism which took place here in NZ was, in point of fact, *French* government authored] you should probably Adjust your Perceptions, accordingly. https://archive.fo/y18hv https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2019/03/16/flipping-the-script-on-fridays-terror-attack-in-christchurch/
>>2671 Nothing more disgusting then a filthy jew pretending to be Swedish.
(290.68 KB 329x385 ClipboardImage.png)
(3.63 KB 195x200 jew face.png)
(199.07 KB 329x385 jew check 2.png)
(207.68 KB 329x385 jew check 1.png)
I have performed a jew check on him, and he aligns remarkably well with the the model here: >>442. There's a high chance that he is a kike. >>2673 Sadly much of the Indo-European scene online is crawling with Zionists and other weirdos trying to subvert it.
>STJ exposed and BTFO >Thuletide exposed and BTFO >Arya Akasha exposed and BTFO Is there anyone that is actually good who is prominent in the pagan / Indo-European scene?
>>2676 This freaks me out. I have a similar looking nose. This guy's nose isn't even like the stereotypical one.
>>2679 His nose isn’t really that jewy, look at the pics I have attached and console yourself. In general this guy has a very strange skull-shape as well and a host of other factors and pieces of evidence that point to be him being a kike
>>2678 Thulide hasn't been exposed and btfod, the problem with him is that he acts like a liberal when it comes to DNA. The real redpill here is that anyone who goes on around acting like some form of e-celeb is a subversive or a glownigger. Even imageboards aren't same from it, considering we seen the 8chan's /fascist/ and /pol/ filled with so many actual shills that it wasn't even funny.
>>2665 >Le Nazi Never mind fuck this guy.
>>2681 >Thulide hasn't been exposed and btfod, the problem with him is that he acts like a liberal when it comes to DNA This is true, you are right. He’s really out of place with the other two, really, where there is ample evidence for kikery afoot. Thuletide has made some good articles here and there. I don’t think he is subversive, but perhaps slightly misguided in some areas >The real redpill here is that anyone who goes on around acting like some form of e-celeb is a subversive or a glownigger. Very true
>>2678 don't seek idols period. you will always become letdown.
>>2680 >His nose isn’t really that jewy, look at the pics I have attached and console yourself. In general this guy has a very strange skull-shape as well and a host of other factors and pieces of evidence that point to be him being a kike The nose isn't always a telling factor, kikes are also known to have bulbous noses; in this case the nose bridge and his ears are more telling of his kike blood than the traditional hook nose.
>>2678 What about Varg? He seems like the least kosher out of all of them.
>>2693 Varg is a retard who thinks Nordics originate from Neanderthals and refuses to admit doing the action that saves Nordic people and not tweeting to your cult 24/7. He also wants to distinct Nords from "White" as well, which makes me think he's a controlled opposition.
>>2678 >Is there anyone that is actually good who is prominent in the pagan / Indo-European scene? Out of prominent people, probably Sri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya. At the very least I can tell he's not LARPing and his books are actually decent. I've benefited from him. He's not perfect though either, one should always keep >>2685 in mind. The problem areas with this guy are seemingly his position on women and how it is not in accordance with the Vedas and potentially caste. I wouldn't join his group or anything but I enjoy listening to him. >>2693 Varg is the least kosher. The issue is that he his paganism is very bizarre ('everything is a metaphor for a placenta') and statements about how autism is a superpower and the like. I don't know if he's controlled opposition necessarily, but he's a bit wacky. He practices what he preaches though. He has what, seven kids now?
(1.00 MB 888x597 75 percent wamen.png)
>>2713 So you say that this native New Yorker whose real name is Frank Morales and who dresses like the average street shitter of pooistan and paints his face like the cannibals of new guinea is not a LARPer? A guy who literally goes by an invented fantasy name he gave to himself? A chubby, pudgy, balding Wannabe-Latin-Lover-Antonia-Banderas-Lookalike with the body height of Gimli son of Gloin, who calls himself a yogi, master of self discipline? And he is not in any way a LARPer you say? Ok, sounds perfectly reasonable. And "probelm areas"? Lol. His deeds contradict his words, he is extremely dishonest. He called Prabhupada an avesha avatara (that means he thinks that Prabhupada's deeds and words are God's own by proxy) in many of his videos yet he completely disregards Prabhupada's and the Veda's stance on the role of women in vedic society. He even went so far as to initiate women as vedic teachers by his own admission. Empowering the shiksas like a true jewish feminist, isn't he now? Why does he do it? Look at the picture. What do you think is the male to female ratio of his disciples / donors? There's no vedic guru more authentic than the one selling cofee mugs 'n t-shirts on his website after all!
>>2805 >There's no vedic guru more authentic than the one selling cofee mugs 'n t-shirts on his website after all! Shills always mention this. The man's running a non-profit 501(c)(3), if some retard wants to buy a mug or a T-shirt to support his work, let them. It's no different than giving a donation, except for the donator is getting a product in return. Regarding the women followers and there being more - in general women are more religious on average and get interested in this sort of "alternative" spirituality than do men. That's very well-documented. I don't even think he looks as bad as you are saying, and you obviously have some sort of axe to grind. When I say he is not LARPing I mean that he actually believes in God, the gods and the like and is knowledgeable in the areas he talks on that I have seen. This said, and this was made abundantly clear in my previous post, I think the biggest concern with him is, obviously, women. I wish I could ask him this, and maybe it would be worth emailing him about and seeing if any sort of response could be gotten. I have similar questions about his caste interpretations. I'm not saying that this dude is the savior of the White race or any sort of expounder of infallible truth - at most he is an interesting channel that occasionally provides good information. Everyone should keep an open mind in watching anyone though, because they could always be pushing subversive content without knowing it.
>>2805 >being surrounded by women is muh larps! No one post a pic of Der Fuehrer or anything.
>>2657 Odin's equivalent is Zeus and Jupiter, I think we're missing a myth somewhere where Odin gifts Thor his lightning powers, some of it has to do with Mjolnir, according to the myths but I am not sure how true to the reality those stories are being recorded from half forgotten stories told by the Grandparents of second generation of Christian Norsemen whether on Iceland or elsewhere.
(229.32 KB 1000x681 hitler flowers.jpg)
(44.45 KB 500x488 hitler group.jpg)
(91.17 KB 920x621 hitler group 2.jpg)
>>506 Are you serious, nigger? It's illegal for a britbong to make a video and not be a fag because of ZOG in their country. What I know about Celtic warriors is that being a headhunter was what a warrior aspired to in the same way that a German aspired to be a Viking raider. Clearly that refers to killing as an act of great importance. I'm a VikingCelt and I don't think a man is a man until he has fought, gone off to war, and worked hard for something. We used to have initiation rites for this reason (to make sure). Furthermore, until recently, the Australians would still have their warriors kill a prisoner and called it "blooding," so until recently our people still did normal things. All this kike shit is a recent, faggoty aberration from an otherwise glorious history spanning literally hundreds of thousands of years. The natural man is a warrior, as David Lane once said. If you were born to be a man, then be one. Your instincts will lead you in the right direction. No one ever taught me shit, yet here I am, as an Anon.
(48.20 KB 630x380 ZimZam Infinity.jpg)
>>2821 LMAO, thank you, anon. Also of note for shills are phrases like "Namefag X is our guy." Obvious outsider concepts really should stand out, and if not, go by the old HateChan protocol and lurk the fuck moar. There was some MGTOWnigger up above in the thread who can't seem to figure out that there are plenty of "modern men" AKA not-men AKA faggots and just wants to only blame women for the behavior of the enemy kike jew, which is flat-out retarded. Never go against your own people with D&C. That's an ancient concept called the Frith. Pic unrelated because I have to shitpost a little.
>>2818 >>2821 >Chubby dwarf with the charisma of a potato sitting in a room with 23 self deluded new age hippies Oy vey, goyim! Look over here my fellow aryans! I found you the new Adolf Hitler. The new and improved version of the Fuehrer. He play no games this time around cawse you can even buy coffe mugs 'n sheeeit on his website!! Nomesayn??! He already gets in between one to two thousand clicks per video after a decade of youtube. At least 80 people regularly watch his incredibly well made livestreams. Soon he will top the Adolf in popularity, only 80 million followers more to go. Then the Golden Age will be here. He guarantees it you know, just send some shekels his way. It's non-profit, bros!! (501(c)(3) tax deductible bros!!)
>>2840 This is really just some demoniac behavior. I feel bad for you.
>>2842 >calling a small overweight person with strange mannerisms a chubby dwarf with the charisma of a potato on some obscure internet forum no one really cares about Oy vey goyim. You are literally a demon!!! I just wanted to shill in peace for a guy who literally shits on the vedas and Prabhupada by initiating women as vedic teachers. He is the greatest living authority on Sanatana Dharma. He writes so himself on the backcover of his new book. It's true in his mind!
This book was linked in the reading thread and is a nice overview of Zoroastrianism from what I have read so far. There are also helpful links to the Yasna to the right. It is amazing to read the descriptions of the nature of Ahura Mazda and to realize what the Abrahamics have tried to wholly appropriate from Zarathustra’s experiences. From what I have read so far, I feel like I must change my opinion on Zoroastrianism being subversive. http://avesta.org/dhalla/dhalla1.htm
(44.43 KB 500x488 a bunch of vedic teachers.jpg)
>>2808 > Pictured on the left is the Fuehrer with a new batch of freshly initiated vedic teachers. Soon they will be teaching his generals and ss-officers the dangers of toxic masculinity. There is a reason the jews targeted our women first by unleashing wave after wave of feminist propaganda and brainwashing upon them. Putting any woman in charge of anything other than her own household is absolutely degenarate and adharmic behaviour. The vedas are clear on the role of women in society. To deviate from this puts your idol in direct opposition to the vedas. And selling cheap trinkets on a website does not behoove a brahman. this is acceptable of vaishyas but combined with the constant begging it is the behaviour of a shudra.
(448.29 KB 655x839 ClipboardImage.png)
(372.02 KB 629x637 ClipboardImage.png)
(348.91 KB 588x633 ClipboardImage.png)
Since it is being discussed, it is worth posting what exactly the Laws of Manu say about the dharma of women in society. TL;DR - >women were created to bear children >men should marry women younger than themselves >women are always to be under the control of male guardians >women are 'exalted in heaven' by the mere factor of being obedient to their husbands >a woman faithful to her husband and controlling her body, mind and speech is known as a 'good woman' Prabhupada said all of this himself too, as others have been pointing out. Unfortunately Sri Dharma Pravartaka Acharya is indeed teaching in the area of women highly adharmic doctrines. None of what is said in these passages should be that controversial. Most of it is just common sense repeated by men of wisdom for millennia. Hitler himself grasped the different dharmas of men and women as well. The question is why SDPA ignores this.
>>2891 >The question is why SDPA ignores this. I think it's really anti-semitic of you to ask this kind of questions.
>>2979 I really don't think he's a kike though. That doesn't mean he's based either, mind you. I have read his Dharma Manifesto and he quotes from the Talmud saying that even the best of the goyim should be killed, and goes on later to classify nations into three categories, some of which can sustain civilization (under which he lumps all traditionally White nations) and those which can't (which are all non-White, esp. Africa and South America). And then we read see in that books bibliography citations of Savitri Devi, Evola, Yockey, Mishima, Stoddard and other figures. He's way to woke to be a kike, but he falls flat in particular areas hard.
Why was Angra Mainyu said to fear next-of-kin marriage (Xwedodah), and be powerless before the man who practices it? http://www.avesta.org/mp/shayest.html#chap18 http://www.avesta.org/vendidad/vd8sbe.htm
Can someone explain to me how zodiacs really work and if they are or aren't memed over by new age bull.
>>3188 It's bullshit, unless geocentrism can be proved, or that location of the Earth is special in some way. Otherwise there's no special meaning to the position of celestial objects like stars and planets relative to Earth.
(36.77 KB 575x74 ClipboardImage.png)
>>2891 Ultra-based
(652.76 KB 1280x1822 1460277188593-2.jpg)
>>2891 Could you post the original PDF to that please?
>>3334 I would, but I don't think that particular edition is online. I own a paper copy so what I did was go onto Amazon and search for the parts that I wanted in their book preview to post here. I'll attach another edition / translation of that book though, but I'm not sure about the quality.
>>3188 Zodiacs are real, but also misunderstood by mostly women and liberals.
>>3347 Where does one go for a true understanding?
>>3348 I don't have the PDFs, because I actually bought the solid books, but you can read Evola's Hermetic Tradition.
>>3349 No problem, thanks. Evola's stuff is easy enough to find online at least.
In regards to the germanic pagan religions, has anyone read the Snorres Edda here? I heard it was written in a more raw format before the 'christian' scholars came and translated the poetic and prose eddas.
(516.29 KB 2203x2988 prabhupada.jpg)
>>3323 >>2891 >"As soon as a woman attains the age of puberty, she immediately becomes very much agitated by sexual desire. It is therefore the duty of the father to get his daughter married before she attains puberty. Otherwise she will be very much mortified by not having a husband. Anyone who satisfies her desire for sex at that age becomes a great object of satisfaction. It is a psychological fact that when a woman at the age of puberty meets a man and the man satisfies her sexually, she will love that man for the rest of her life, regardless who he is."

Delete
Report


no cookies?