>>883 Well done, LaTeX really makes for clean documents. I wish it was used more outside of science. Thank you.

>>890 I hope you don’t anhero anon

>>896 Ty. I've no plans to do so. I have health issues which may dispatch me sooner than the glowies can suicide me if they have the stones for it. kek. Here is a serious topic with a funny title that always makes me laugh.

Do you have anything relating to Tor or the old internet before 2000? I have a fascination with niche communities and the history of modern computers.

>>898 I don't have anything related to TOR specifically but the title attached to this post may be of some interest to you. You probably know that TOR was developed by spooks and made available for public use to create traffic on the network for them to obfuscate their own use of the network. There is a lot of info on TOR available but I'm really no expert on high level commsec in this age.

Thank you for the books, hope you are doing well. I noticed the books you've posted had recently been released together with everything paladin press put out. All of the files can be downloaded here: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/s1rp9mx4330z6/PALADIN_PRESS_COMPLETE_COLLECTION Maybe you'll find other interesting books in these collections. 10.3 GB worth of reading all together.

select a lines to copy text

ghislaine evidence exhibits. larger files in the link https://www.mediafire.com/file/gjwlkbxlb60owot/filedump4chan.zip/file

>>892 ok i didn't know. newfaggot status

April 4, 1998 - Judicial Insanity and Schoolyard Massacres April 11, 1998 - Building Understanding April 18, 1998 - The Mestizo Menace May 2, 1998 - The School Problem May 9, 1998 - Cowardice and Individualism

May 16, 1998 - Paying the Organizatsiya May 23, 1998 - Nationalism v. New World Order May 30, 1998 - How to Improve Our Souls June 6, 1998 - The Lesson of Africa June 13, 1998 - The Genocide at Vinnitsa

June 20, 1998 - Democracy June 28, 1998 - Lew, Bill, Tupac and Mitchell July 4, 1998 - More on Reparations July 11, 1998 - Thinking About a White Future July 18, 1998 - Thoughts on the Fourth of July

July 25, 1998 - Superman, Volkswagen and Lazar Kaganovich August 1, 1998 - The Romanovs, Child Porn and "Hate" Laws August 8, 1998 - The Lesson of Amy Biehl August 15, 1998 - Media Myths August 22, 1998 - David Geffen, Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg

bump ty for contributing. i panicked when i saw that archive got deleted and downloaded all of the files just in case they disappeared forever, can't remember from where. anyway, ty for uploading

https://theconservativemind.net/conservative-books/ https://alt-right.com/books/ http://www.bookride.com/2009/06/collection-of-right-wing-books.html https://third-reich-books.com/

Theres that other website where i can't remember the name but it contains many types of books such as philosophy, history, culture, christianity, the jewish question, nationalist socialist and hitler related books, fiction, etc. An alt right white library website. Dunno if its still up but its a goldmine. If anybody recognizes it, please refer the link to it.

pic related. hammerstorm.org too but you'll have to register to see the links

>Redpills on Trans Are you serious zoomie, redpill on self harm patients with XY(male) pretending to be XX because they're mentally ill? It would give the mental patients credibility to adress them with anything else than ridicule

>>825 Wtf are you even replying to?

>>826 OP

>>827 Go be a faggot somewhere else, the point of most redpills is not to preach to the choir, but to be baby's first steps to waking up to the bullshit they are fed every day. Half of the women repills are obviously normie tier as are most of the trans ones If the "story" is that trannies are normal, then ridicule makes it easy to dismiss as merely biggotry™ . The easiest way to redpill a normie on the subject would be to show them the obvious mental instability of trans and body dysmorphia and/or the connections to sexual abuse both the high rate to which they report being abuse as a child and the high rate that they abuse others. If you don't have something to share or to say besides another shit post, then fuck off back to 4chan

The great replacement https://pastebin.com/uSRnph6T Diversity https://pastebin.com/wLUVNAaW Diversity + Proximity = War https://pastebin.com/8KzwzHkE random https://pastebin.com/VedZEJQP Immigration https://pastebin.com/NPru70TB Race mixing https://pastebin.com/Gjqxz47w

>>152 first image should say PHENOTYPE not GENOTYPE lets not look stupid please

>>510 https://archive.fo/HvLg9

>Debunking the Out-of-Africa Theory https://prisonplanets.com/2016/08/04/man-did-not-come-from-africa-debunking-the-ooa-theory/ https://archive.fo/wip/Z2LoJ Erectus Walks Amongst Us, by Richard Fuerle, challenges the political correctness and mainstream assumptions about race, genetics, and the origin of modern Man. I found the book absolutely amazing in terms of information. Much of the stuff I never heard before. I had briefly written a review of this book earlier this year. This article explains more in depth about my findings. BTW, a hard copy of Fuerle’s book is over $150 from Amazon the last time I checked. Fortunately you can read it here for free: http://erectuswalksamongst.us. (As of 1/29/17 I was not able to access it) (Archived https://archive.fo/http://erectuswalksamongst.us/* ) The out-of-Africa theory goes something like this: all humans on earth evolved from Africa (By “Africa”, I’m referring to sub-Sahara Africa). Africans migrated out of their continent around 65k years ago. They first replaced the Asians and then the Europeans. Because of their superiority and strength, the Africans were able to replace the more primitive populations of homo erectus and neanderthals in those continents. Thus everyone’s roots can be traced back to Africa. According to Wikipedia, the OOA theory is the most widely accepted model of the geographic origin and early migration of anatomically modern humans among paleo-anthropologists. I will show you, based on the book, that this theory is flawed. “Throughout history, most of the instances of people from one region attacking and conquering substantial portions of another region have involved ‘northerners’ invading more southerly lands.” (Hart, 2007). Large Genetic Differences Until the 1960s, Neanderthals were classified as Homo neanderthalensis, a different species from us, Homo sapiens. But the genetic distance between Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis (<0.08%) is less than the genetic distance between the two chimpanzee species (0.103). Today, Neanderthals are classified as Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, a sub-species of our species, while we are another sub-species, Homo sapiens sapiens. The genetic distance between (sub-Saharan) Africans and Eurasians (0.2%) is more than twice the genetic distance between living humans and Neanderthals (0.08%) so, at the very least, Africans should be classified as a sub-species, Homo sapiens africanus and Eurasians as another sub-species, Homo sapiens eurasianensis. Finally, the genetic distance between Homo sapiens and Homo erectus is estimated as 0.170 (mean given as 0.19), about the same as the genetic distance between the Bantu Africans and the Eskimos, but the genetic distance between living Africans and Eurasians is 0.23 (Table 7-1, p. 45). Thus, Homo sapiens is more closely related to Homo erectus than Eurasians are to sub-Saharan Africans. Either erectus should be reclassified as Homo sapiens erectus or sub-Saharan Africans should be reclassified as Homo africanus. (Fuerle, Chapter 28) Source: