Questions/Posts That Don't Deserve Their Own Threads

In an effort to minimize the amount of questions/one liner posts please post said content in this thread.

Welcome to /pol/ - 16chan's Politics Board.

This board is dedicated to the discussion of all topics pertaining to politics.

Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are some examples of off-topic and/or /b/-tier threads:

>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>Are X white?
>Is X degeneracy?
>How come X girls love Y guys so much?
>If X is true, then how come Y? Checkmate Z.

The variety of threads allowed here are very flexible and we believe in freedom of speech, but we expect a high level of discourse befitting of the board. Attempts to disrupt the board will not be tolerated, nor will calls to disrupt other boards and sites.

Please check the global rules and board rules before posting:
https://www.16chan.xyz/.static/pages/globalRules.html
https://www.16chan.xyz/pol/rules.html

In 2017, we had openly pro-White marches drawing hundreds of participants, in the open, in broad daylight. Say what you will about Richard Spencer and Mike Enoch, or the proven infiltrator Mathew Heimbach, in 2017 pic related made sense. But it has been 4 years since then and our real-political strength has grown weaker. Paradoxically, the regime has placed itself in such a weak position that if we had been organized today, we would be in a fantastic position to begin affecting the real politics of America. Not running random people for irrelevant positions, but garnering public support for direct action against the regime. Yet obviously, we are much weaker today than in 2017. Why? The regime has thoroughly embarrassed and discredited itself, appearing exceptionally oppressive and incompetent. Meanwhile, it has dropped almost all pretense of being a nation of laws and has morphed into a media and drug corporation controlled po1ice state. It has been humiliated abroad by being defeated by the Taliban, while domestically there is both strong factionalism and dysfunctional government. While the Biden regime is obsessed with enforcing ever more unpopular and draconian mandates, the willingness of local authorities to enforce the increasingly deraigned mandates is questionable. While the regime is transforming America into a po1ice state, they have simultaneously hamstrung their own enforcing terror apparatus by purging everyone who will not take the death-vaccine. They have no reasonable way to replace the unvaccinated zogbots. And given the evidence for an ineffective or harmful vaccine, the remaining zogbots may suffer from health problems or even death. Meanwhile, the economy is imploding around us. The regime is weaker than it has ever been, yet no one is fighting back? Why is this? I am not entirely certain, but my theory is simply that people are experiencing shellshock from the sheer czutspah of the regime. Meanwhile, the living standards have not yet collapsed to the point where the worthless lemmings experience true privation. Only inconvenience. Ironically, by turning America from a liberal democracy into a totalitarian po1ice state with hyper inflation and shortages of basic goods, the jews will be doing us a favour by removing the main impediment to galvanizing the lemmings against them. By hamstringing their own enforcing terror organizations through purges, the ability for the FBI to disrupt and destroy dissident organizations will likely be greatly hindered. Still though, it is depressing to see that so many people will mindlessly go along with whatever humiliating new rule the regime comes up with. Dr. Pierce was right about everything.

Stripped down to its essential aspects, an empire is a state where a core population exerts control over non-core subject populations/territories. By very definition, an empire is a non-homogeneous, multi-ethnic state. A state of many nations. A homogeneous state cannot be an empire, it is a nation-state. The primary problem with an empire is that the non-core population not like their subjugation to the imperial heartland and will always seek independence from it. This means that they will not fight for the empire very hard or contribute anything more than what they are forced to pay. In order to suppress revolts and maintain the flow of taxes/loot, the core population will be mobilized by the jews to plunder and suppress the subject peoples. They will also be mobilized to defend the frontiers against truly foreign states seeking to expand their empires. For a while, plundering conquered peoples will be very profitable, especially to the jews of the core population. However, eventually there is only so much that you can loot a subject population until it becomes too impoverished to make your occupation profitable. The smart thing to do at that time is to abandon it, stripping its last wealth away and taking it back to the home province. But this never happens because of human nature. The jews will never stand for the "shame" of abandoning a worthless territory to move onto greener pastures. So the result is always taxing the core population more and more to pay for and to defend increasingly worthless hinterlands. This is a heavy price for the core population to bear. First of all, while you are soldiering, you are far from home and thus not contributing to your people's genepool or the economic vitality of your core homeland. Thus, every hundred thousand men you send out to defend the far flung provinces of your empire is another hundred thousand men who will not become fathers or who will not be around to raise their children. This happened on a micro-scale in Rhodesia where the White men were called up to defend Rhodesia constantly and thus were depriving wives of their husbands (decreasing population growth) and children of their fathers. The stress of constant war drove many White families to just emigrate, leading to a population collapse in just a few years of war. Seriously, look into just how often White men were called up to defend Rhodesia and think about what this did to the economy and society. Even if this were only a small effect, it compounds over decades and generations to produce a collapse of the core population and the withering of the economic prosperity of the core territory. The Empire suffocates both the subjects and the core population. While the core population suffers from constant war, the non-core subjects will have one small advantage; They will not need to defend the empire, so they can focus on expanding their own populations. Sure, they will be ruthlessly exploited by the imperial armies, but they can at least grow over generations while the core imperial population declines. An example of this on the micro-scale is the American black population remaining at "home" breeding and moving into the cities while the White population went abroad to get slaughtered in WW2. The cynical, rootless elite of a late stage empire will eventually seek to expand the core population (they view us as resources) by extending citizenship to the conquered peoples. However, rootless jews fail to understand that tribalism/nationalism cannot simply be dictated from the top. Subject peoples will never embrace Romaness the way the Romans will. And at the first opportunity to defect, they will do so. Meanwhile, by diluting the core population with expanded citizenship, you cause two catastrophic reactions. 1. You remove the feeling of unity which allowed the core population to endure the hardship and sacrifice necessary to conquer and maintain the empire. If everyone is a Roman, then being a Roman is a worthless identity. One of the reasons why the Romans were so open to foreign religions was because they had lost the sense of rootedness and purpose after generations of fighting the original forever wars for no understandable purpose other than a paycheck. The Romans had lost their reason to exist because there was no reason to want to be a Roman. 2. You invite foreign interests into the power structure. Instead of uniting Britons, Africans, Syrians, and Thracians in common cause with the Roman people, you bring in their own internal squabbles into the power structure and end up causing more fractures within the empire. The Britons and Thracians have aspirations and needs which have nothing to do with Italy. Their jews will always seek to syphon wealth away from Italy and channel them to their territories and peoples. If they have any power, they will use their power to sap the wealth of the empire for their benefit.

Why don't White Nationalist/sympathizers bring this up more often? The Jews have been milking this hoax for 2000 years. We know how all the Egyptian Pharaoh's who allegedly stormed into the parted Red Sea died. None of them died by drowning or blunt force trauma, as one would expect had they died when the Red Sea supposedly collapsed around them. Egyptians never recorded a slave rebellion of such size. They kept excellent records. There would be some mention of such a thing occurring. Why would Charlemagne do picrel? Likely, (just a guess) the kikes were spewing the same guilty lies back then as they are today about the hollow hoax. The big advantage is that, I believe, normies will be more receptive to it, than hollow hoax deboonking. Once they see that the kikes were lying about how they wuz slabes en sheeits they will be more receptive to the idea the holocaust was another kike lie. I think the main reason it hasn't been brought up much, is Christianity. Christians want to enshrine their holy book as unquestionable fact. When it's just as absurd to think Moses raised his septer and the Red Sea parted, as to think that some Jewess pooped diamonds.

Legit if anyone is blackpilled/wants a white pill you really fucking should give this article a read. Probably the only enjoyable thing i have ever read from Salon: >https://www.salon.com/2021/09/06/beyond-the-crisis-of-democracy-does-anyone-still-believe-in-liberalism/ "There's been considerable chatter over the past few years about the crisis of democracy — sometimes more clinically described as a "democratic recession" or "democratic deficit." And for good reason: When Donald Trump stripped the flesh off the American body politic, he revealed a disease that has become endemic throughout the so-called Western world." "Faith in the power and goodness of democratic self-governance, previously as unchallenged and ubiquitous as belief in God during the Middle Ages, has decayed into the empty, hopeful rituals of the Anglican Church. " "Trump and Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán and Jair Bolsonaro and Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Rodrigo Duterte and all the other pseudo-democratic usurpers around the world didn't arise out of nothing. To suggest that they all simultaneously tapped into a current of know-nothing darkness and bigotry and moral weakness that has been there under the surface of society all along, like undiscovered crude oil, is not a remotely adequate historical or political explanation. " "To see so many marginal democracies tumble into the abyss — and a great many well-established ones tiptoe right to the edge — suggests that something else is going on, a deeper pattern we aren't ready or willing to look at. " >>>"That deeper pattern isn't just a crisis of democracy in the narrow sense, meaning a system or mechanism for selecting hypothetically representative leaders, because that itself is a symptom or symbol. It's about the failure of liberalism" "If liberalism remains the only paradigm available to resist the rise of Trump-style autocracy, as generally seems to be the case, then we're in deep trouble, and the dread so many of us feel about the inexorable erosion of democracy is fully justified. Does anyone today — literally anyone — possess the kind of universalist, upward-trending faith in liberal progress that drove the mythology of John F. Kennedy's brief presidency or the moral clarity of the civil rights movement? " "Only someone with a time machine could tell us whether it will be possible to redeem or renew the better aspects of the liberal tradition as a vibrant force against the rising tide of jingoism, tribalism and autocracy. What we can say right now is that every few years someone emerges on the world stage who is embraced by the media and political caste as the savior of liberalism — or, worse yet, as the "transformational figure" who will overcome political paralysis and division — and it never ends well. " "Obama came to office hoping to put an end to the era of red-blue political division and change the terms of American public discourse. Even his extensive post-presidential fanbase doesn't talk about that too much now, because it makes his entire project sound hilarious and doomed, like King Canute trying to hold back the tide. His utter and complete failure to do those things — like all other failures of all other liberal politicians — usually gets blamed on Republican intransigence, entrenched public prejudice or his own lack of Beltway backroom negotiating prowess." "Barack Obama was the most charismatic and eloquent political leader most of us will ever see. He won a landslide election (over a widely respected conservative war hero) as the last great defender of liberalism. His presidency failed because he was the last great defender of liberalism — maybe, in retrospect, something like the Mikhail Gorbachev of liberalism —not because Mitch McConnell was mean to him or because Revolutionary War cosplayers terrorized members of Obama's party into pretending they didn't even know him. Or rather, all those things amount to the same thing: Obama believed he could make us believe in the promise of liberalism again, but he couldn't because we don't, and because none of these golden-boy savior-hero types can ever do that. He tried and we tried, and it was a nicer exercise in nostalgia than the one that came afterward. So at least there's that." ... Holly fuckin shit bros. I can only get so errect..

/CVG/ No Gooks Edition Coronahoax Lockdowns & Vax Discussion, News, and Memes >As of February 2021, eleven vaccines are authorized by at least one national regulatory authority for public use: two RNA vaccines (the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine and the Moderna vaccine), four conventional inactivated vaccines (BBIBP-CorV, Covaxin, CoronaVac, and CoviVac), four viral vector vaccines (Sputnik V, the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine, Convidicea, and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine), and one peptide vaccine (EpiVacCorona). Coof Tracker >COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6 Previous Thread(s) >>20758 >>25345 >>36899

MEMES & OC Dump your /pol/-related webm / mp4 / memes / OC here.

Every day I contemplate what is maintaining the jewish regime in America. By any metric of the past, the USA should be a warzone right now. Yet barring some relatively minor incidents, the USA is as peaceful as you would expect a dystopian but stable empire. Why? What is maintaining the regime's stability? Historically, two things maintain a regime; Popular perception of its legitimacy (public support) or fear (state monopoly on violence). Obviously, both are necessary but ideally, your evil empire is maintained by public support more than fear because fear is a weak motivator. A regime which has no perception of legitimacy is a weak one, yet it may be maintained by an overwhelming security apparatus. If a regime lacks both legitimacy and a monopoly on violence, then it is nothing more than a club of men who will be replaced by whomever is strong enough or popular enough to overpower them. Now, idk about you, but I do not trust any polls from the regime. So I must base my analysis on my own experiences with people. I admit that this is not scientific, but given that the regime is not going to be polling people on whether they'd support an insurgency anyway, it's what I have to work with. Based on the information I glean from my interactions with random people, there is almost no active support for the regime. Not among cuckservatives nor even among shitlibs. Thus, I must conclude that if the general population isn't too dissimilar to the people I know, there is low support for the regime. This actually is backed up by system polls which show extremely low support for both Biden and the US congress, even among shitlibs. So why does is America not a warzone? It seems to me that the problem is cops, feds, etc who are maintaining the regime by creating an aura of fear + general apathy among all elements of the multi-racial US population. So long as cops and feds are "doing muh job," Whites are too cowardly to oppose the regime. Or are they? The Irish managed to summon up the courage to resist British imperialism despite the full force of the British army set against them. This kind of thing has happened repeatedly across time. So maybe there is more to the story than merely the presence of cops. If we examine what facilitated the Irish insurgency against London, it's clear that widespread popular support for the revolt was present. But even the best of our speakers have so far failed to come up with a way to garner widespread support for White Revolution in America. In any case, if you know any cops, I suggest you find out what is motivating them to continue enforcing jewish laws. If police would just fuck off and stop enforcing jewish laws, then maybe White people would have enough breathing room to recover our courage. As a kinetube shitlib, StormCloudsGathering, once said; "Talk to a soldier"

How does it work? >we take a poster like pics related >replace the QR code with one that links to a /pol/-tier video (or other piece of media) >the video can be anything: Moonman, information about the JQ, memes mocking George Floyd, footage of the Christchurch Prank (only if it's legal of course), etc. >we post the images IRL or on social media >sit back and watch the chimp-out There are many websites with which you can convert URL's to QR codes. A quick search brings up this one for example: https://www.qr-code-generator.com/ Any of the images posted can be used. The KFC one is highly recommended. Anons can also make their own posters if they want. Another suggestion is to place fake coupons with QR codes in Jewish neighborhoods. That way we can be certain that they will be scanned. Anons can be as edgy as they want. They can choose themselves what they put behind the QR code, which encourages participation. This thread also serves as a way come up with ideas for posters and for material to put behind the QR code.