>And he never once suggested that we denounce everyone who acted.
Who said "everyone"?
His words as per his article make it clear where he stands in light of these glowops and what their purpose is (which hasn't changed at all and is very efficient so the Jews will keep using it) in opposition to meaningful targets of value, as more than clearly implied here, >>57756
, which I have to quote again because the chimp you are can't comprehend anything:
<Both the Jews and the government, in fact, are using the recent Los Angeles shooting now as ammunition to chip away at the Constitution. Janet Reno is using it as an argument for a national gun registration law. The Jews are using it as an argument not only for more restrictive firearms laws but also for laws against what they call "hate speech." Jews want to abolish both the First and the Second Amendment.
<A final word: I'm not trying to say that we must be careful not to provoke the monster, that if we don't provoke it maybe it won't eat us. The monster fully intends to eat us as soon as it can: as soon as it has proceeded a bit further in its program of persuading the couch potatoes that if they will just give up the First and Second Amendments -- and perhaps one or two others -- they all will be safer and happier. Ultimately the only way we can prevent that is by killing the monster. The monster is at war against America, against our people, against our freedom, against our traditions, against our children's future, and it is a war to the death. So far the monster is winning that war. If we want to change that, if we want to begin winning instead of losing, then we must fight the monster with intelligence and self-discipline, not with childish daydreams of victory through drive-by shootings.
>Dr. Pierce praised Bob Mathews and all his supporters as Revolutionaries.
You really are nothing more than a lump of human waste if you think you could compare the Bruder Schweigen with these groomed shooters. Only a traitor would make such a comparison.
>And Pierce always implied that only through violence would we ultimately overthrow the System.
By attacking the System where it makes a difference and hurts it. All the shootings we have seen never hurt the System but made it stronger, as pointed out by Pierce.
>So you lied
You proceed with strawman arguments.
You are the only one thus far who claimed that Pierce would denounce everyone. It's absolutely insane how you could even get that from the text he published when the course of action he advocated for what rather obvious, a course that is simply the same as that repeated by all skeptics who knew (((who)))
these attacks truly benefited in the end.
>That is strike one which indicates that you are an anti-White shill.
Pierce wasn't anti-White and he was clear on what or who should really be targeted. I agree with him wholeheartedly.
>Strike two is the fact that instead of attacking my argument with facts, you resort to jewish tactics of insulting like a child
What a fucking man baby you are. I blended facts with
an insult, because you totally deserved it. Nigger.
Message too long. Click
to view full text.