/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, News, History

[Start a New Thread]
Posting Mode: New Thread

Max message length: 5000


(used to delete files and postings)


  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.

11/25/19 Just launched Formerly Chuck's, an imageboard dedicated to television and film! Come check it out and quality post.
11/23/19 Donations can now be made via PayPal, thank you for all of your support!
11/21/19 We have successfully migrated to LynxChan 2.3.0, to see all of the changes to 16chan, click here.
08/15/19 The 16chan Android app is now live! Instructions on how to download it and set it up can be found here.

[Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(215.72 KB 1440x715 NVapF.jpg)
Marriage & Divorce: "Trick to get trad marriage in a fag state" PrussiaBro 01/07/2020 (Tue) 09:07:20 ID:55bb39 No. 20423 [Reply] [Last]
Let's discuss and share inforgraphics about marrying in a foreign country, so their country's marriage laws apply in your country. Which likely has no-fault-divorce and feminist civil law marriage. For what I am concerned, civil law marriage isn't real marriage. The goverment fought religious institutions, because they were a sort of parallel structure to the state (especially the catholic church) and the state now not only "recognises" marriages. But also regulates them. We are now at a point, where the goverment through feminism, has completly corrupted marriage. They actually fucked it up completly. The natural law says that a woman gets a man's ressources by submitting to him as the patriarch of the newly created family unit. He protects and provides for her. Authority and responsibility are linked in perfect harmony. The woman is sexually exclusive to him and bears him children, which are of his dynasty. Now normies still think that this is basically what marriage is, when they marry. This is how strong the Institution is. But what the actually get, when they commit to civil law marriage is this: >contract solely legally binding for the husband >husband pledges to maintain the marital lifestyle of the wife >also pledges to maintain that lifestyle for a very long time, if the contract ends or breaks >pledges to see no legal difference between the contract being ended or broken >actually because of no fault divorce, there is no such thing as breaking the contract anymore, making any reference to "cheating or breaking the marriage contract" only a colloquial phrase, but not one of legal relevance

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

1 post omitted.
>>20450 The ceremony isn't the marriage... you could do a small ceremony for the family after you already got officially married in another country. Weddings outright though are a scam it cost around 10 grand just to do a backyard wedding. The judge ruling over would depend on the state laws, don't get divorced in California, NY,Florida or NJ. I think the best to help fight against a shitty judge regardless would be claim of religious factions must be presided over by male relative and sexual orientation. Claim that your religion can not giver over earnings because they are your payment in to heaven and that your sexual orientation is that you are sexually attracted towards money.
>>20458 >Claim that your religion can not give over earnings because they are your payment in to heaven and that your sexual orientation is that you are sexually attracted towards money Make sure when you are before the (((judge))) to bring your black hat and long coat. Maybe a few shekels to rub for good luck.
(135.31 KB 1125x1313 thot.jfif)
Good thread. This discussion should be held more. To many people on the chans still have the "just get married, lmao" mentality. I would like to add that there is still the option of solely marrying before the church and not before the state. If you were to find a denominational of Christianity that has very low divorce rates, you could convert and seek a wife within that religion. I think the options in the US are: >Mormonism >certain sects of Baptism >certain sects of Protestantism >Mel Gibson-tier Catholicism Does anyone have any statistics on divorce rates within these religions? And does anyone know any good denominations in Europe? As far as I know there are very few Christian fundamentalists left in Europe. >>20423 >And the sad thing is that somehow marriage itself or women get blamed and create gender wars Women are to blame for a big part of it because if a political movement were to call for a return to previous marriage laws, most women would oppose it, since they consider it "oppression of women" which it kind of is, and that's a good thing
>>20423 >christian >not Odinic I'm not sure why in the fuck I would want a different brand of cuck shit over another brand of cuck shit.
>>20532 How many Odinic temples are there in the US that provide men with lasting marriages? 0 It's not necessarily about religion, but about finding decent marriage partners. In order to prevent a woman from divorcing, there needs to be pressure from the community.

(378.11 KB 1660x1024 the chad robert bowers.jpg)
MAJOR HAPPENING ONGOING Anonymous 12/10/2019 (Tue) 21:17:08 ID:9a476d No. 17706 [Reply] [Last]
>Five dead, includes shooters, cops, civilians >multiple shooters, possibly still active >multiple explosive devices, including a truck bomb >3 Jews among the injured https://www.broadcastify.com/listen/feed/25863/web https://www.rt.com/usa/475522-active-shooter-jersey-city-police/ https://mailchi.mp/jewishmediagroup/three-chassidic-jews-reported-hurt-in-jersey-city-shootout Wonder if it's one of /ourguys/
48 posts and 16 images omitted.
(161.36 KB 1594x1466 232323.png)
>>19942 Jokes on you, shit meme maker, you linked my schizo troll comments. Guy who posted brainlets is the real Chad.
(8.97 KB 259x194 download (2).jpg)
(59.37 KB 1135x847 Rally exposed.jpeg)
>>17706 >jersey-city- Wait, I thought they B&'d guns how could this happen?! We clearly need stricter gun laws.
(66.76 KB 381x602 1578253844699.jpg)
>>20538 I too thought that more laws would prevent more crime but I was wrong. I admit, /pol/ was right. Can I come hang out with you guys now?

(48.49 KB 198x232 kike.jpg)
What are jews? Anonymous 10/26/2019 (Sat) 07:37:18 ID:87b70d No. 11665 [Reply] [Last]
In your own words, go
287 posts and 70 images omitted.
(22.73 KB 474x266 76786.jpeg)
(69.37 KB 950x644 Hansi-5433.jpg)
>>20289 I'm neither a boomer, nor a bot, and the comment I replied to was pretty much a flowery disinfo word soup with no facts and only appeals to emotion. That low-brow strategy works on 4chan, but not here.
>>20292 >>20292 Mate I was not calling you a bot. But referring to the comment you replied to I know for a fact that post you replied to is copy pasta from a automated spam bot that is on a lot of boards, Most of us here can recognize it due to how slow to board moves, it is easy to tell friend from foe >the comment I replied to was pretty much a flowery disinfo word soup with no facts and only appeals to emotion. That low-brow strategy works on 4chan, but not here. Yet it was enough for you to respond to, had you just ignored it the janny could have simply removed it after getting my report. Yet here we are now further derailing the thread.
Jews are spawn of Satan, his literal children on this earth.

(12.38 KB 302x167 Gun-confiscation.jpg)
Electric Boogaloo Virgina Anonymous 01/04/2020 (Sat) 21:58:24 ID:6e577a No. 20152 [Reply] [Last]
>Governor “Blackface” is supporting SB 16, which would ban commonly-owned firearms in more than one million Virginia households -- a ban that would even outlaw sporting weapons such as the Mossberg 930 Snow Goose. >The Governor has requested $4 million and 18 law-enforcement positions to enforce his gun ban -- a request that could be the preparatory steps for confiscating the guns which would be banned by SB 16. >Moreover, the Governor is requesting another $3.5 million to enforce gun control that has NOT been passed by the legislature and is NOT even current law in Virginia: universal background checks, one gun a month limitations, so-called “red flag” gun confiscation orders, and more. 1) The Governor is requesting $7.5 million to enforce a gun ban, Universal Background Checks, a one gun a month limitation, “red flag” gun confiscation orders and more. Do you support this appropriation of money even though NONE of these provisions are currently law in Virginia? 2) Given that NONE of these gun control restrictions are currently the law in Virginia, would you support a budget amendment preventing the governor from using any funds to implement these anti-rights restrictions via executive order? 3) Would you support a budget amendment that would prohibit any funds from being used to implement the provisions of any new Northam gun laws until a final judgement is received from the Supreme Court that they are constitutional? 4) Would you support or oppose a budget amendment prohibiting the governor from using the National Guard or police to implement any confiscation or registration of firearms pursuant to legislation passed by the General Assembly? 5) Would you support or oppose a budget amendment prohibiting a locality from using any funds made available to such locality to implement any confiscation or registration of firearms pursuant to legislation passed by the General Assembly? 6) Would you support or oppose any budget amendment attempting to penalize Second Amendment localities by reducing funds otherwise available to those localities because of their Second Amendment Sanctuary status? 7) Would you support legislation to immediately outlaw and confiscate guns, without compensation, when the gun can currently be legally owned in Virginia and all 49 other states? Moreover, if that provision was challenged and overturned, would it be okay with you if the costs of such a lawsuit were placed on those legislators who voted for it? http://archive.md/dMljY
29 posts and 28 images omitted.
>>20495 Today The House and Senate conviened for the first time this year. The house Voted a Speaker and a Clerk. After that they are supposed to vote on House Rules. In an unprecedented act they placed temporary rules (which were not discussed or voted on) and delayed adoption of actual house rules. They then voted to notify Senate that they were Dully Ready to proceed for the year... In order for them to be ready they must adhere to three things constitutionally 1. Vote Speaker 2. Vote Clerk 3. Vote House Rules They unconstitutionally passed their Dully Ready notification to the Senate.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>20496 Yeah and? Kill them or stop posting.
>>20496 Record Number Of Guns Sold As Dems Vow To Disintegrate Rights >In a not so surprising report, the FBI conducted a record number of background checks for gun sales in 2019. All of these gun purchases ramp up every time democrats open their mouths voicing support to disintegrating the rights of the people. >The FBI carried out a record 28 million background checks on firearms purchases in 2019, as Americans rushed to buy weapons amid calls by wealthy elitists in Hollywood and Democrat politicians for tougher gun laws. According to FBI data, 28,369,750 background checks were performed in 2019, smashing the previous record of 27 million in 2016. The agency ran 202,465 checks on Black Friday alone. The Christmas period was a festive one for firearms retailers, with just under three million checks carried out in December, the second-highest month since the National Instant Criminal Background Check System began in 1998. –RT >“Americans are choosing to invest their hard-earned dollars in their ability to exercise their rights and buy the firearms they want before gun control politicians attempt to regulate away that ability,” a spokesman for the National Shooting Sports Foundation told the Associated Press in December. >Though violent crime has decreased by more than 50 percent since the early 1990s, mass shootings continue to make gun control a headline issue in the US. Last year saw a number of high-profile slayings, including two shootings in Texas in August that left 30 people dead, a massacre in Virginia Beach that killed 13, and a bloodbath at a nightclub in Dayton, Ohio, that killed nine. But that’s all in how the mainstream media (a mouthpiece for the government) prefers the populace “feel” about guns. Every Democratic candidate for next year’s election has promised to restrict gun rights in some manner, with Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke proposing a mass confiscation of AR- and AK-style rifles in September, shortly before dropping out of the race. O’Rourke’s fellow Democrats, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, then announced that they too would introduce their own mandatory buyback schemes. The following month saw the third-highest number of checks in the whole year. –RT
(53.17 KB 1280x725 article-4609-4.jpg)
>>20504 Study Shows Leading Cause Of Gun Violence Is Those You Disagree With Politically POLK, UT—An exhaustive new study from the CDC reveals that the leading cause of gun violence in America is your political opponents. Researchers looked at a number of potential causes of gun violence such as mental health, family situation, cultural shifts, gun laws, rap music, videogames, sugar consumption, and the actual gunman, but by and large, the most prominent cause of gun violence was what most already suspected. The fault lies with those who you disagree with politically. Researchers say they almost forgot to even consider the idea that the shooter had any volition or free will of their own. After looking into it, they said that the gunman was, "...a moot point. The fact is, even if the gunman didn't act, your political opponents would have caused the violence one way or another," lead researcher Karl Porkenheimer. "They wanted this in the first place." Other findings include: 99% of gun violence will end the moment your political opponents are wiped from existence A large amount of gun violence is prevented every year by vulgar tirades against your political opponents online Tests revealed large traces of blood on the hands of your political opponents "These results are pretty conclusive," said Porkenheimer. "Your political opponents are the real problem here. Americans have a lot of work to do, and that work starts with calling those you disagree with politically murderers. If enough of us can manage to do that, just maybe we'll see a shift in these horrible attacks."

(1016.34 KB 2858x2442 328c1c10130bf625.png)
Anonymous 12/17/2019 (Tue) 05:50:35 ID:ca49ed No. 18503 [Reply] [Last]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp8-fsqWj0c What's the deal with Belarus? Anyone have any insight? "The last dictatorship in Europe." He doesn't sound so bad from here. Lukashenko seems more out of the Stalin mold, than the Hitler even though he seems tolerant of Jews. Also, of note, in the video, the recreation of the assassination of Lukashenko's political opponent is done to make it a real event in your head, when it's not proven that it actually happened. I've also heard that it is the poorest nation in Europe, but a crime rate comparable with Japans. From wikipedia: <Belarus was once a major center of European Jews, with 10% of the population being Jewish. But since the mid-20th century, the number of Jews has been reduced by the Holocaust, deportation, and emigration, so that today it is a very small minority of less than one percent. And Yiddish is a recognized language. It's odd that he allows them to stay.
6 posts omitted.
>>18503 >10% of the population being Jewish Holy Fucks We already get screwed when they're 0.1%!
>>20089 Learn to Read Belarus was once a major center of European Jews, with 10% of the population being Jewish. But since the mid-20th century, the number of Jews has been reduced by the Holocaust, deportation, and emigration, so that today it is a very small minority of less than one percent. The Lipka Tatars, numbering over 15,000, are predominantly Muslims. According to Article 16 of the Constitution, Belarus has no official religion. While the freedom of worship is granted in the same article, religious organizations deemed harmful to the government or social order can be prohibited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belarus They are 0.1% not 10% now Judaism See also: History of the Jews in Belarus >The first Jewish communities appeared in Belarus at the end of the 14th century and continued to increase until the genocide of World War II. Mainly urban residents, the country's nearly 1.3 million Jews in 1914 accounted for 50 to 60 percent of the population in cities and towns. The Soviet census of 1989 counted some 142,000 Jews, or 1.1 percent of the population, many of whom have since emigrated. Although boundaries of Belarus changed from 1914 to 1922, a significant portion of the decrease was the result of the war. In late 1992, there were nearly seventy Jewish organizations active in Belarus, half of which were country-wide.[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Belarus >The history of the Jews in Belarus begins as early as the 8th century. Jews lived in all parts of the lands of modern Belarus. Jews were the third largest ethnic group in the country in the first half of the 20th century. Before World War II, the Jewish population had dropped from roughly 910,000 to 375,000 due to mass migrations, but Jews were still the third among the ethnic groups in Belarus and comprised more than 40% of the population in cities and towns. The population of cities such as Minsk, Pinsk, Mahiliou, Babrujsk, Viciebsk, and Homiel was more than 50% Jewish. In 1926 and 1939 there were between 375,000 and 407,000 Jews in Belarus or 6.7-8.2% of the total population which was down from roughly 13.6% of the total population in 1897.[3] Some 246,000 Jews of 375,000—66% of the Jewish population—were killed in Belarus during the Holocaust.[4] According to the 2009 national census, there were 12,926 self-identifying Jews in Belarus.[5] The Jewish Agency estimates the community of Jews in Belarus at 20,000. However, the number of Belarusians with Jewish descent is assumed to be higher.[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Belarus
Belarus is probably one of the Whitest countries in Europe. You could probably walk down downtown Minsk at 3 in the morning and not have to worry about being attacked for being White.
>>20092 >religious organizations deemed harmful to the government or social order can be prohibited. BASED
>>20141 How is it based? It is asscancer

(434.63 KB 1339x739 5ae6e40140b80.jpeg)
Anonymous 12/20/2019 (Fri) 12:19:52 ID:a349b8 No. 18832 [Reply] [Last]
Idea #1: Making an alternative wiki to sites like wikipedia or infogalactic, we either hijack an existing wiki (like metapedia), or create a new one from scratch, then we copy over everything from wikipedia/infogalactic to our own wiki (with the possible exception of the pre-existing articles in a hijacked wiki), and then we proceed to edit the shit out of it until we make every article our own. finally, we promote the hell out of it, without indicating that it is in any way politically motivated, simply call it a "free speech" wiki, dedicated to "facts and truth before opinion and bias" in opposition to the "censorious and biased existing wikis, whose management, staff, and editors wish to control how their audience thinks with dishonest tactics".
29 posts and 15 images omitted.
>>20306 we are not exactly looking for votes here. we need to create a generation that aligns with us, that is how we win. The votes don't matter as much as the general shift in culture. We need a legion of the disaffected to evoke large-scale change, even if it's over a period of time we can't see right now. Think about the Jews in the united states, the new deal was passed on slight of hand, and it would not have lasted had the following not occurred: - americans were distracted by ww2, a foreign war pushed by bankers - jewish subversion agents enter usa, some as refugees fleeing german persecution - jews insert themselves into institutions of power and influence via shapeshifting, then dominate them via ethno-nepotism aka loxism. - they proceed to create the hippies, the first woke generation, they knew how to sell their subversion to the target demographics, framing it as something they would see as being harmless and innocuous, they knew just how far to push things, and refrained from going too far too soon, their extreme ideas look quite tame to us today compared to the modern degeneracy they eventually escalated to over time. - then they either co-opted or created new subcultures, each of which took things a bit further, all of which were targeted to the youth and became commonplace in high schools, often on the backs of the newest art and media. Metal, Punk, Goth, Glam, Disco/Funk, Emo, Grunge, Rape/Hip-Hop ("Flyting" adapted for Blacks), Nerds, Jocks, Preppies, etc. they used the PT Barnum rule: something for everyone. Thus they gained control over multiple generations of youth by controlling the limits on what they would think. Look at the enemy now, legions of adult bodies with the minds of children, specifically teenagers and tweenagers, tey have never grown out of rebellion for rebellion's sake, and they are no longer cute, but now dangerously insane. We are following the example of subversion set to us by the kikes, now that they are the establishment, they have become vulnerable to their own tactics, targeting the young, and focusing on where our strengths lie is the key to our eventual victory in the political arena. the kikes are great liars, so they use entertainment and fiction, the realms where good liars prosper most, to change how the young thought. we have the truth on our side, so we teach the youth how to think, and present facts and logic to them, free of bias, we show our work in detail, and demand that they investigate to debunk our claims, in the case where they do, we admit our errors, and change the claim to be correct.
>>20324 If I was to teach the young a new paradigm, this is what I would teach them: - there is only one truth shared by everyone, only one objective reality, the evidence does not take sides, it does not lie. The word "Truth" should never be used to refer to opinion, and one should never believe in multiple "truths", especially on a personal/individual level. - the scientific method is the perfect system of rules with which to approach the truth, the philosophical method is the perfect system of rules to argue by, science is not a set of facts, nor is it a community, appeals to any majority or form of authority is the behavior of an insidious cult. - groups of people do not aggress upon one another because they are different, nor because one thinks themselves superior to the other, the only reasons for aggression of any kind by one group of people against another is because they think the other group is a threat to their group, or because they think that one group has committed some injustice against their group that must be punished or compensated for. Groups committing some form of aggression against another never claim to be the ones in a position of power, they always claim to be oppressed, they never claim to be the perpetrators, they always claim to be the victims, they never claim to be acting out of hate or fear of the other, but out of love or courage for themselves. This is truly how humans can do evil and think themselves righteous. In the case of Milgram and Bystander effects, obedience to authority is only practiced when the authority is perceived to be trustworthy, competent, and benevolent, scientists are regarded as the preisthood by those who think authority of consensus has a place in science, or that science is merely a body of knowledge rather than an epistemological process. Bystander effects are reduced ones people are de-individualized, the bystander effect is the result of people no longer thinking of themselves as a member of some collective. - we must learn to ignore our amygdala, we must reject religion which results from amygdala overactivity, yet also reject globalism which results from amygdala underactivity, I agree with Dawkins in that the magnet experiment he was right about the role of the amygdala in pattern recognition and threat assessment. - the only objective good is the goal set by evolution in the propagation of our genes, this justifies things such as "anti-semitism"/"racism"/"sexism"/"homophobia" etc. the only objective evil is the violation of the NAP, as these are the only system of moral that can truly be said to be universal to human civilization across location and time period (having existed at least since ancient Sumeria and it's "code of Hammurabi"), the concept of a system of laws based around ownership of person and property and informed consent as the only acceptable medium of interpersonal interaction is the foundation of all justice. - contrary to any depiction in fiction, the humans who care for the environment are setting themselves further from nature by doing so, the humans who care about their own genes and their own species first is actually closer to nature. the beings of the wild only care about the good of their own species, none wish to do anything for the sake of another species or for the world in general, that is a quality of humans that is unique to us. Mother nature cares not if the whole world dies out and can no longer support life, she is a social darwinist, pitting everything against each other, she promotes discrimination and savage conflict, to frame her as anything but this is to ignore all the true lessons of nature about you. To be a part of nature, you must become selfish to your genes, and, by extension, to your species as well.
>>20327 you know what? I was wrong about one thing, there are two other reasons one group of people would do anything later seen as being unjust to another. a third reason is that they think they are helping, such as by bringing civilization to them, or allowing them to share the same territory. the forth is that they are improvising, and things just work out in a way that later appears to some as being unfair, but which were fair in the context of the events surrounding those actions at the time, the designated "bad guys" were simply coming up with solutions to problems as they arise, not intending to do any harm or good to anyone, in fact, in most cases, they were doing the absolute minimum needed of them to deal with whatever they were going through. For example, jew paid nobles to build them the jewish quarters as they desired a place where they had complete political autonomy and exemption from the rules everyone else had to follow, and the walls and curfew were built because people were attacking them for usurping their power over their government and because they were stealing land away from them and practicing their own laws on the stolen ground, essentially building another country within their country.
>>20327 >>20340 I just thought of another thing: - anyone believing in prophecy is a fool, the claim that some particular vision or form of governance, even in terms of specific laws or policies, is fated to be the ultimate future of human civilization is a liar or madman. Marx's divination of humanities "progress" as a species from dialectical reasoning, is as scientific as harold camping predicting the end of the world in 2011, it's pseudoscience, claiming science for the appearance of authority, there is no way for us to know what the "ultimate form of governance" would be, or even if there is such a thing, the idea of some fixed "progression" of human history is a supernatural belief system that induces zealotry and violence in it's name, just like the Salafist doctrine of Jihad found in Islam. Prophecy is the motivating factor of aimless, directionless violence against any who dare explore a different path than what their predictions claim to be "fated" to occur. Anyone who is a "progressive" or who talks about "progress" and "regressive" concepts believes in the supernatural idea of fate. it also makes no sense, if one policy replaces another, it is by definition "progressive", even if it was a policy that was in place at some point in time before the one which it had displaced. globalism has been tried many times before, as has democracy, and egalitraianism, and socialism/communism, and every other idea you consider "progressive", in fact, they have been first tried before "regressive" policies like nationalism and fascism, and much more times than these well, by this logic, fascism is more "progressive" than any tired thing modern liberalism has had to offer.
yeah, what are you ideas?

(786.79 KB 1418x1128 1568937213720.jpg)
mass shooting 'accelerationism' works and is vital to our survival. Anonymous 12/24/2019 (Tue) 10:18:49 ID:555f6e No. 19090 [Reply] [Last]
The left is INSANE. The political whores in the democrat party can't be controlled well enough by their masters. They will fuck up and cause violence against average gun owners if we put enough pressure on them, which will at least lead to riots and scattered armed conflicts, which will in turn put pressure on the economy (normies/lemmings can't function under pressure, the left will instantly shit itself and overall productivity will plummet), and likely cause it to crash (it's already extremely weak, the fed is desperately plugging the leaks by printing billions of dollars). Then we have our civil war, then we have our chance to throw off the chains of the jew, regroup, unite europeans worldwide, form an ethno-empire like Third Reich Germany, and finally exterminate those jewish demons for all time. Everything we need is lying on the table. This is our last chance. TAKE IT.
149 posts and 13 images omitted.
>>20253 Look if someone wants to argue that this was orchestrated, that he was coached into it, or given orders to do it, I'm more than willing to entertain that. Of course, that's hard to prove, because all you got is this video for your evidence. Solution lets comb a shitty resolution, stream compressed uploaded, downloaded, shit bitrate gopro video for for the tiniest anomaly. But as soon as you start on the schizo cgi bullets, shooter armed with 4 guns 12 mags, but HANDLER places ONE mag in floor of hallway for shooter, odd things like a car moved, unidentifiable blob then you can fuck right off. possible: the men were in main room/side room, the women were in different area, shooting starts, women flee, one wife runs to car, she wants to save her life, her SON and husband is inside, pulls out of parking lot, waits,

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>20034 >Opportunists Reducing nation states to "opportunists" is grave error in underestimation. Almost every state that has the means would become embroiled in an American domestic conflict, especially our immediate neighbors north and south of the border. There is no room for victory in this scenario. Whilst the past is beneficial to study, the odds we would face are unprecedented; we would literally be trying to resist scores of militaries from across the Earth. I appreciate your confidence and attempts to defend your rationale in a logical manner, but when you slow down and examine the big picture, we are at a new junction in history where asymmetric warfare has been rewritten. Think about millions of highly equipped foreign troops, armadas of cutting edge land, sea and air assets converging on one nation, think about the inevitable deprivation, futility and chaos of trying to mobilize, coordinate and supply a fundamentally out-gunned and out-manned force that faces decimation from domestic, foreign and natural threats. We are talking WW3 here, an event that will have no historical comparison because of its fundamentally new nature. Willpower and optimism is not enough, reality will break you if you gamble with poor odds. If our people keep throwing the hand all in too many times, we'll be out of the game, permanently. >Idealogy Heh, I strongly doubt I'm aligned with 70% of what anons here stand for, maybe if you dropped the 0, that number would be more accurate : ) Anyways, I see you've responded in my other thread, which I am grateful for. I'll go address those points and I appreciate the comments and concerns. As far as the application of violence, some things are not suitable for public discourse; that being a big one. Let's be smart, discuss strategies that don't incriminate ourselves or draw too much unwanted attention. Dirty laundry should always be kept in the family; away from prying eyes and spoken in hushed tones...
>>20406 Based anon
>>20263 >But as soon as you start on the schizo cgi bullets, shooter armed with 4 guns 12 mags, but HANDLER places ONE mag in floor of hallway for shooter, odd things like a car moved, unidentifiable blob then you can fuck right off. If you used "you" in a general manner then it would be hard not to agree with you. What you list as stupid statements, that's the usual disinfo ; counter-intelpro seems to be the high brow name for this method of outrageously stupid claims. >the women were in different area They were indeed supposed to be in their own room. >So what? Maybe the event was 37min's and Zog is claiming 33. Doesn't really help your argument, that shooting was fake. >>20253 did not claim it's fake. >As to the fake deaths? Why? You retards accept that Zog sacrificed people on 911, but no, can't have a few normies get shot, they have to go to an extreme length to fake that event Again, the message you refer to does not contain any claim it's fake. >Could SOME shootings be FF, sure. >Can they ALL be FF. >No. Thus far most of the biggest events seem to have been on the side of FF. One thing for sure, they all have this unsettling habit of happening exactly during drills.
>>19090 Shut up Hitler

Did Meritocracy create the hellscape we know today? Anonymous 12/28/2019 (Sat) 02:08:24 ID:134968 No. 19469 [Reply] [Last]
I was curious what you guys think about this thought that hit me. I've been pondering a lot lately the ultimate question of who the true marionette masters are. Many will say Jews; some will say Freemasons, others secret banking cartels, some might say there is no one in charge and we're witnessing the results of a chaotic world - and some may even suggest aliens, or as we know our ideological adversaries would say "White Men." But it got me thinking - ALL of the above. Our society is being drained at the pump by a conflagration of unchecked GREED. Now before you view this as me taking heat off of Jews - I'm not. They have a unique role in all of this. So to boil this down my MAIN QUESTION was: "Have Nationalists in the West ever had the support of their own Elite classes and if so, when did this stop and why?" - Because this is going to be a keystone foundation in the adversaries plans. If you read Culture of Critique by Kevin M. you'll see that he briefly explores the degredation of influence that he old WASP military and industrialist families lost at the beginning of the 20th century in the US and how this vaccuum (in part created by Jews) enabled them to begin the subversive take over of the US government and ALL of America's cultural institutions. Including the military. So why did our Elites so obviously abandon us now? Why has no new crop re-surged and taken up the torch? BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT THE SAME PEOPLE. PERIOD. As the old Anglo-Military complex. Western Europe for the past thousand years was ran by a LANDED and BIRTHED aristocracy - and it's upper class had to marry into that system in order to succeed. I.E The Elites had a stake in the ethnic composition of the nation, as they were it's founding stock and the nexus point of the State's construction. I believe that over the course of the industrial revolution, with the way wealth traded hands in European society - A MERITOCRACY (capitalist) was put in place and our Elite who were in charge due to good personal bearing, the trustworthiness of their family names and the reputation trading game that had built their Kingdom's - well that was all supplanted by the burgeoning wealth of a growing upper class who DID NOT INHERIT their wealth. THEY ACQUIRED IT. Could this change in circumstances have changed the fundamental state of who lead European society - a changing of hands from old guard military families to Capitalists who's GREED allowed them to join the upper ranks of society. >TL;DR What happened to the Anglo upper class that had racialist sympathies? Was the upper class in Western society replaced with greedy salesman opposed to philosophical gentleman?

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

4 posts and 1 image omitted.
>>19533 I feel that this is our new role to become the new generation. Amass wealth, live the double life and connect in the shadows to one day build us up again. I just don't know how we get that message out again.
>>19507 >the conditions that best generate wealth You mean rent-seeking backed up by state violence to ensure compliance for the subjugated?
>>19469 No. Jews did. They usurped power from the weak-minded, materialistic Anglos and are now in a position to put the most useless and evil people in positions of influence (stupid niggers, warmongering neocons, etc) while keeping intelligent Whites out of elite schools and high-paying jobs.
>>19469 Here is who is at the top. Illuminati Pharaonic blood line families of Satanists. Their home base is Switzerland. This is the Crown Banking cartel which rules over Britain, her commonwealth countries and the US. Next, the Jesuits and the Black Pope. These created the CIA. Next, the Pope. Next comes Britain, the Queen. Next, all of the above forming the 3 city state. Next, the Knights of Malta who run the banking cartel. Add to that the Rothschilds and main banking families. They own U.S. Inc and Congress.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Satanism is misdirection to ruffle the feathers of christcucks and give a banner to stooges. The real deal is qabalism in its many forms. From the brit royalty, to freemasons, to jews, to all the abrahamic, egyptian cuckish even mormons. Its the well spring that has demonically possessed this planet for far too long.

(71.90 KB 1024x615 Nat.jpg)
Any anti capitalist nationalists here? Anonymous 11/02/2019 (Sat) 08:24:58 ID:944f13 No. 13025 [Reply] [Last]
Strasserist here, I wanted to know if you guys have some positive attidutes towards us and if we can have debate regarding economics.
>INB4 Ancaps yell "Lmfao you do not understand economics hahaha"
I actually do understand it, Capitalism is a moving contradiction, a fraud system at very best, yet despite EA being the peak of capitalism, and free market being general bullshit, people would for some reason defend it.
58 posts and 17 images omitted.
(156.07 KB 395x302 SW.png)
(166.61 KB 1280x720 serveimage2.jpeg)
>>19440 >Anti-capitalism should be the foundation for all third position/fascist beliefs. Agree, while anti-capitalism is important ... capitalism is only one symptom of a greater problem, exploitation can exist in every system and spotting it and shutting it down is important. Something Marx would hate because he insisted that his ideas are perfect and can never be subverted. At this point shilling capitalism is like shilling square wheals its simply dumb. >>19452 >Capitalism as much as communism cares nothing for the survival of white race Agree. >But planned economy is untenable. Nonsensical, there is no distinction between a planned economy or anything. Everything is planned the corporations today have boards who plan how many products to produce, shops are not some magical infinite product generation places. No idea what you even mean under "planned economy" all products where always planned only this is hidden from you the pleb (see industry secrets and know how). Do you think agriculture is a "planned economy" ? You know you plan how many seeds to plant and expect yealds in the harvest based on some formula who takes factors like bad weather and pests damaging the product into account.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>16923 I know I'm late to the thread, but your typical sports fan in these parts is not a pub hooligan, let alone an athlete. Your typical "Superbowl is a holiday" sports fan is usually fat, lazy, and dim witted, no better in terms of morality than a trust fund baby or welfare queen. They only work when forced to or when it explicitly and immediately benefits them directly. Otherwise, they can't be bothered to perform even the simplest of tasks. Furthermore, they'll support whatever ideology is in power, as long as it guarantees them a steady supply of junk food and escapist entertainment.
>>20321 That and there is a another factor for the US. It use to be. If your were from Boston your team was the Sox. You knew the all the players, hell maybe you went to the same school as the star player, or had his lil brother in your class. Maybe his dad was on the team way back when. Their was a history there and more. Now a player might grow up in NY, play for LA and live in Seattle, Paris in the off season. Worse than that, he is a free agent and for sale. Another 1 million on his contract and next year he is playing for the rival team. Then some cunt buys the rest of the team and moves it to Dallas and changes the name to Shithawks. There is nothing to fight for or get passionate and exited about
>>19759 >No idea what you even mean under "planned economy" fucking hell dude
>>16057 Without a chassis, it looks a lot like the Keaton Batmobile

(32.82 KB 600x350 dims.jpeg)
Book Thread Anonymous 11/12/2019 (Tue) 01:23:29 ID:41e129 No. 14430 [Reply] [Last]
Hello /pol/. I've been busy since the shut down. I hope this thread stays up. I will share Zundel's Bunker. I am reading AK Chesterton's "The New Unhappy Lords."

40 posts and 36 images omitted.
>>17228 In essence. Morgoth's got expanded from 18gigs to near 25 gigs.
Hitler, Born at Versailles by Léon Degrelle Table of Contents Léon Degrelle Biography...................................3 Introduction........................................................5 Author’s Preface................................................8 Part I Ambush At Sarajevo.................................9 Chapter 1 Black Hand In Sarajevo....................9 Chapter 2 Europe Reacts..................................11 Chapter 3 The German Dynamo......................15 Chapter 4 Ambition and Revanche..................18 Chapter 5 Poincaré and Caillaux.....................24 Chapter 6 Remote Conspiracies.......................27 Chapter 7 Russia Mobilizes.............................31 Chapter 8 German Restraint............................34 Chapter 9 The Word of a King.........................37

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>20310 Part III The Scoundrels of Versailles.............175 Chapter 44 The Armistice: a Fraud................175 Chapter 45 British Demagoguery..................176 Chapter 46 The Morass of Paris.....................180 Chapter 47 The Soviets in Germany..............181 Chapter 48 Populist Noske Takes on Communism...................................................187 Chapter 49 First Weeks in Paris.....................191 Chapter 50 A Comedy....................................195 Chapter 51 The Sabotage of Disarmament....198 Chapter 52 Soviet Republics in Germany......200 Chapter 53 The Communists in Budapest.....205 Chapter 54 Germany Crushes Communism. .208 Chapter 55 The Alsace-Lorraine Booty.........210 Chapter 56 The Rape of Saarland..................214 Chapter 57 France in the Rhineland..............217

Message too long. Click here to view full text.


no cookies?