>So do you claim that if he avoided using Nazi, he'd still be a shill?
Yes, because it was just one of the things that made him a shill.
>Hitler sent a positive sign in 1933. When did all these Germans quite their faith?
<In 1939, 94.5 percent belonged to a Christian church, while 3.5 percent claimed to be Gottglaubig, and only 1.5 percent were without a faith
>And is that going to make any difference to your argument since the German elections put Hitler in power through a process that was much more democratic than what the US Constitution intended for US citizens?
Useless strawman. I wasn't saying that Rockwell was trying to get in using democratic means, I was saying that the constitution was based on classical liberalism.
>use of the word untermensch by the Jews are their allies
Strawman. I only ever referred to "untermensch" as in the original German definition.
>We use the term redpill that is a direct reference from a SF multiracial Zion-loving movie made by two Polish guys turned trannies, all produced by a kike.
That's why I don't use "redpill" often or at all. Again, another "strawman". Who's the "we" here, you and your jewish shill platoon?
>I asked you for proof of the skinheads that supposedly hurt Rockwell's party so badly. Where is the evidence?
Literally the image I attached. Are those people you want put in power? No, they look like filthy rednecks.
Another strawman accusing people of shilling for Mathis.
Message too long. Click
to view full text.