/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, News, History


[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply Return
Säge
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.


02/09/20 /ausneets/ has been added!
11/23/19 Donations can now be made via PayPal, thank you for all of your support!
11/21/19 We have successfully migrated to LynxChan 2.3.0, to see all of the changes to 16chan, click here.
08/15/19 The 16chan Android app is now live! Instructions on how to download it and set it up can be found here.


[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(49.09 KB 971x546 Dmx4MA0UYAER5Ea.jpg)
Non-Whites are the real NPC's Anonymous 02/11/2020 (Tue) 20:02:58 ID:cd2ce4 No. 22702
They are different. ALL non-whites with the save exception of a few anomalies. Maybe 1%. 2%. But the vast majority of them are like this. I don't know how to describe it. It is a difference not only in looks, but in behavior, and something else. It's like they are lacking something. I don't know exactly what it is, but I can best describe it as a state of being. All Non-whites. Blacks, Hispanics, Asians. Even Japanese in some respects. White people are on a different level, mentally and spiritually. That's as best as I can describe it. This level allows us access to additional faculties that other nonwhites cannot access. I don't think this is just IQ and smarts. It's something else. No, don't go telling me its IQ. There is something more to this. Something spiritual. Non Whites are the real NPC's. I feel an unease around them. I feel that something is off. You do too. And its for all nonwhites. Something is just off with them, something is off center, something is just NOT RIGHT. I don't know how to describe it. But it turns them into NPC-like characters in this clown world that we live in. Only Whites display certain characteristics like independent thought. I think this independent, critical thought is being suppressed by TPTB. But we have it. This critical thought manifests itself in what they describe as "Conservative", "Libertarian" or whatever else they want to label our ideals as. The ideals that are in these realms of thought are primarily "White People" ideals. I fully subscribe to the idea that all civilization has been built by Whites. NO ONE, EXCEPT WHITES have built civilization. And the funny thing is that nonwhites want to be around us. They follow Whites. Wherever we go, they want to go, too. I dont want to be around nonwhites. The only nonwhites I feel safe around are ones that have significant White admixture (some Latin, basically). All others I cannot stand, and want to get away from as soon as possible.
>>23200 And I asked you to define the word "Adamites" as it is not currently a race known to man. The Torah and the New Testament are sperate works. The New Testament was written in Greek the Old One (ana the Jew one) was written in Hebrew. >Iberia No, it comes from a Greek word which in turn comes from the name of the River Iberos in Iberia. >Carthage Carthagians were not white and infact was a heavily semetic empire that relied on mercanary troops. That's not an example as it is A) Not European and B) Already known as an Empire with Semetic roots. >Abraham Abraham was Jewish along with his lineage Moses and his kind. He was born in Ur and lead the Isrealites and became the "original Jew". He and his kin are as Jewish as it gets. Oh and "Hibernia" means the "Land of Winter" in classical Latin and comes from the word "Hibernius". Which means "Winter".
>>23117 This isn't a forum you fucking newfag. Lurk 2 years. Also, learn to understand the point of religions, like how semitic religion is the complete polar opposite of any and all White European views.
>>23203 >And I asked you to define the word "Adamites" as it is not currently a race known to man. I broke that down in another post. Here I'll repeat it: The name Adam comes from the Hebrew word ‘aw-dam’ which has a special meaning. It means to 'show blood in the face', 'to flush', 'to turn rosy' or 'to be ruddy'. Only the white race has red rosy cheeks, is capable of blushing and can show color in the face. since all the Children of Israel, descended from Jacob (Israel), from Isaac, from Abraham, from Shem, from Noah and all the way back to Adam. If Adam was white and ruddy, and Eve was made from Adam, would it not be obvious that their descendants and the Israelites must also have been white and ruddy just like all of their ancient forefathers. "Adamites" are White people, effectively without genetic degradation. We are the descendants of Adam. >No, it comes from a Greek word which in turn comes from the name of the River Iberos in Iberia. "Iberia" translated means Hewbrew Land or Land of the Hebrews. Hebrew = Whites. >Carthagians were not white and infact was a heavily semetic empire that relied on mercanary troops. Semites are Whites. I'm not sure why Mercenary troops are related to the conversation. By saying that Carthage was "Semitic" (whatever the hell that means) you are actually supporting the idea that non Whites can build civilizations. Let's make it clear here, non Whites cannot build proper civilization. There is no evidence of that today. And it didnt happen back then, either. Or do you believe that they can build a civilization like Carthage? Really? Fake history. You believe in fake history. Carthage means "New City" in Hebrew - literally. Carthage was White. >Abraham was Jewish along with his lineage Moses and his kind. No, Abraham is a descendant of Adam, the first White man Hibernia comes from "Eber" and the Hebrews. Eber is an Ancestor of the Israelites. White People.
(79.75 KB 500x756 3pq954.jpg)
>>23203 pic related...when you think about it, when did it ever make sense that non whites can build anything? With the exception of the Japanese, maybe?
(1.16 MB 1459x463 scrnli_2_19_2020_9-55-59 PM.png)
>>23203 Ancient Israel flourished, because it was ruled by Whites. What happened to the promised land that was given to Israel. Why is it now but a desolate desert? What happened? The Bible clearly describes it as a beautiful lush country the children of Israel were being brought to. “For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys and hills; A land of wheat, and barley, and vines, and fig trees, and pomegranates; a land of oil olive, and honey; A land wherein thou shalt eat bread without scarceness, thou shalt not lack any thing in it; a land whose stones are iron, and out of whose hills thou mayest dig brass.” Deut. 8:7-9 A further description of the fertile lands of Galilee, Perea and Samaria during the time of Josephus: “…for their (Galilee) soil is universally rich and fruitful, and full of the plantations of trees of all sorts, inasmuch that it invites the most faithful to take pains in its cultivation, by its fruitfullness: accordingly, it is all cultivated by its inhabitants, and no part of it lies idle. Moreover, the cities lie here very thick……by the richness of their soil…” “…But for Perea……yet hath it a moist soil, and produced all kind of fruits, and it’s plains are planted with trees of all sorts, while yet the olive tree, the vine, and the palm tree, are chiefly cultivated there. It is also sufficiently watered by torrents, which issue out of the mountains, and with springs that never fail to run, even when the torrents fail them, as they do in the dog days.” “Now, as to the country of Samaria….made up of hills and valleys, and are moist for agriculture, and are very fruitful. They have abundance of trees, and are full of autumnal fruit, both that which grows wild, and that which is the effect of cultivation. They are not naturally watered with many rivers, but derive their chief moisture from rainwater, of which they have no want; and for those rivers which they have, all their waters are exceedingly sweet: by reason also of the excellent grass they have, their cattle yield more milk than do those in other places…” Book III, chapter 3.2-3.4 of war Once the Israelite’s left those region we find the lands declined rapidly. Yet wherever the Israelite’s formed new Nations they transformed them into beautiful, lush lands as God promised they would do. ....because the Israelites are White.
(76.41 KB 400x339 salvia-officinalis.jpg)
>we wuz jews and sheet being pro-white is great. thank you for your service. please stop with the jew stuff, even the "good" jew stuff. >CI militias and communities are great but the beliefs are fucking garbage
>>23207 Everyone is descended from Adam according to the Christan Mythos (unless you are a pre-adamite) and Jews might be swarthy but they can still blush. Red men have been used to refer to White people but that's a bit of a strech considering ruddy has also been used to refer to tanned skin. And doesn't deny anything even if it's true? I guess you could say that means that Adam was white so all his children are? But that's a weak argument and I doubt that's what the authour is implying and doesn't negate the fact it was written in Hebrew and Hebrews are infact sand men. An ancient fiction book doesn't negate that. >Genghis Khan (Mongols) >Darius I (Persians) >Janaab Pakal (Mayans) >Bäbur (Mughals) Non-Whites can form civilizations just not as good of ones. And no ancient Isreal wasn't a "good society". It was just another sand nigger tribe just it happened to be semetic. >Iberia What are you talking about with any of these. A simple search for the root defintion of these words prove you wrong as I already have. Hibernia Land of Winter Comes from Hiberus meaning Winter, where hibernate also comes from and is associated with winter. Learn your Latin or at least Ancient Greek please. None of these names have Hebrew origins.
Infact Adama means "earth" or "soil" in Hebrew since you know... Adam was mad of the dust. So your "ruddy argument" ,if you can even call it that, doesn't make sense.
>>23211 >Everyone is descended from Adam according to the Christan Mythos The Christian Mythos is Communism and Satanic. >Jews might be swarthy but they can still blush. That's because modern Jews have mixed with Caucasian blood. At the time of Adam's creation, the world was filled with non Whites and they could not blush. >But that's a weak argument and I doubt that's what the authour is implying and doesn't negate the fact it was written in Hebrew and Hebrews are infact sand men. Hebrew language = White. Not sure how many times I have to say that. >Non-Whites can form civilizations just not as good of ones. None of those are true civilizations, gimmie a break, what a joke. None of them can compare to the glory of White Nations. Nearly all of the "civilizations" you listed were ran by savages. The history books gloss over many of the savage natures of these civilizations and makes them out to be much nobler than they are. while lowering the glory of White civilizations. Again, communism in action. "Everyone is a child of God". No, only Whites are a child of God, and only Whites go to heaven. The others go to "dust". Dust to Dust. >What are you talking about with any of these. A simple search for the root defintion of these words prove you wrong as I already have. Why you gotta lie? Pic related.
(37.78 KB 460x413 WhitePersiansandGreeks.jpg)
(1.46 MB 2919x1993 Xenophon Hellenica 3-4-19.jpg)
>>23211 And Persians were Whites. A scientific restoration of the original color in ancient Geek sculpture. Here we have a battle scene between Persians and Greeks. The Persians here are exactly as the ancient historian Xenophon described them in his Hellenica.
>>23212 Yes, but it also comes from the term "aw-dam". (to blush). Adam was made from the dust, but he was breathed the "breath of life". The "breath of life" is codeword for a higher level of consciousness that only an Adamite body can hold.
>>23212 “MY BELOVED IS WHITE AND RUD­DY..." (Solomon's Song 5:10) "Nazarites (See Matthew 2:23) WERE PURER THAN SNOW, THEY WERE MORE RUDDY IN BODY THAN RUBIES..." (Lamentations 4:7) THE HOLY BIBLE IS THE BOOK OF ADAM'S RACE AND ADAM WAS A WHITE MAN. The implications of this presupposition are as follows: FIRST: Since the Holy Bible is the Book of Adam's Race, it means that the White Race of Adam was made the custodians of the Sacred Scriptures [not the Jews]! The White Race was given the stewardship of Divine Truth. IT IS THE BOOK OF THE RACE OF ADAM, NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS! It does not belong to the other races, for they have and will receive their blessings through the Race of Adam. "And in thy [Abraham's] seed shall ALL THE NATIONS OF THE EARTH [other races] BE BLESSED..." (Genesis 22:18)
>>23214 Carthage was the only one I didn't disagree with since Carthage wasn't even White and is historical semetic. Nice Cherry Pick. Look up the defintions of "Hibernia" and "Iberia" both non-semetic orgins >Hebrews White No, bad meme 0/10 Langage comes from semetic tribe and Caabites. >Semetic. >Non-White. >"Ruddy" Adama means "earth" or "soil" reffering to the fact he was made from that. >Blah blah civlization Yes case in point. Isreal was a non-White civlizations non-whites can still make them they just aren't as good and infact some are stablized like the Mughal or the Ottoman's until the end. >Ruddier in their body than Rubies Rubies?! So Adam was middle-eastern in skintone. You can't back out of that. Rubies are bright red; that's past the point of mere blush and denotes a darker or "tanned skintone" as Adam means in Arabic.
All this conversation and quotations are doing is making me realize Christanity is more kiked than I thought. Thanks for the red pill.
(58.70 KB 608x608 Im the jew now.jpg)
>>23221 No kidding... I have dealt with a few CI people online and they go to great lengths to claim that WHITES were the "real" Jews and Jews fake. The stupid.... Soon it will be blacks saying they are the whites now....
>>23220 > Carthage wasn't even White and is historical semetic. Carthage was White >Adama means "earth" or "soil" reffering to the fact he was made from that. And "Aw-dam" means ruddy, to blush, why are we going around in circles? You pretty much ignore every point I make unless you can find some way to subvert it. It's almost as if you're a Jewish agent trying to suppress the truth. >Look up the defintions of "Hibernia" and "Iberia" both non-semetic orgins Iberia: https://www.cbcg.org/booklets/america-britain/chapter-eight-israel-migrates-to-the-north-and-west.html the area northeast of the Black Sea, across the Caucasus, “came to be known as Iberia, confirming the presence of Hebrews from the ten tribes in that region.” As Chapter 9 brings out, the Israelites had long before given the name Iberia to an old Phoenician Israelite colony in Spain—hence, the Iberian Peninsula. Collins adds: “The appearance of the same Hebrew name (Iberia) in the region north of Armenia verifies that this region became an area of Israelite resettlement” (The “Lost” Ten Tribes of Israel—Found!, p. 129). Iberia means “land of the Hebrews” and comes from the word Hebrew itself, Ibriy, which stems from Eber, progenitor of Abraham. Hibernia: The fact that Danite explorers were from a very early date familiar with the British Isles—and most likely established at least a few colonies among the Isles—would prove vital to Israel’s long-term survival after the Assyrian captivity. As a key element in the fulfillment of the Abrahamic promises, these Danite pioneers opened the way for later exilic Israelites to follow to the northwest. Just as significant, however, was the fact that both Iberia and the British Isles received a major influx of Israelites—mostly from Dan and Simeon—just prior to the fall of Samaria. Collins notes that by the time of Samaria’s fall in approximately 722 BC, many Israelites had voluntarily migrated out of Palestine in an effort to avoid captivity. He writes: “Much of the tribe of Dan apparently sailed as far as Hibernia (modern Ireland) in their effort to [avoid Assyrian captivity]. Their arrival in considerable force in Hibernia as the Tuatha de Danaans is recorded in the early histories of Ireland.” (Note the similarity between Hibernia and Iberia, which both originate from the Hebrew Eber or Iber; Tuatha de Danaans means literally the “tribe of Dan.”) He adds that “large contingents of the Israelite tribes of Dan and Simeon (the Danaan and the Simonii) sought refuge in Ireland and Britain after abandoning their old homelands [in Palestine] to the Assyrians…. [Consequently,] many of the succeeding waves of Celtic [overland] migrations to Britain … were also Israelites in search of a permanent homeland.”19 Indeed, for Israelites seeking refuge following the Assyrian captivity, any Phoenician or Israelite colony could have served as a new homeland. It is only logical to conclude that Israelites migrating out of the Middle East would have been well aware of these preexisting Israelite colonies in the British Isles. Furthermore: 19. Collins, pp. 122, 125. According to Fell, “the oldest Gaelic name for Ireland is Ibheriu”—which clearly resembles Iberia and Hibernia. He adds that migrant peoples commonly carried the name of their former homeland to a new homeland (p. 63). Thus, we can see why Iberia (“land of the Hebrews”) was anciently attached first to the Iberian Peninsula and later to Ireland—as well as to the Caucasus region, which migrating Israelites briefly settled. https://www.cbcg.org/booklets/america-britain/chapter-nine-the-tribe-of-dan-trailblazing-pioneer-of-israel.html I am providing you references with links. Can't say you've done any of that yourself...but that's what Jews do, they lie and subvert. >So Adam was middle-eastern in skintone. Rabbi, people with red skin tone are commonly referred to as Amerindians. They were described as being White. You can't concede because you're Jewish. :) >making me realize Christanity is more kiked Modern Christianity is kiked. But here is a video of Hitler the Great on Christianity; https://www.bitchute.com/video/Jn1rvyxWG2Tj/
>>23223 The Whites are not the "real" Jews. If you met any real CI people, they would not have attested this. Its your perception and confusion around Jews and Israel that needs to be fixed.
Let me ask you this...if the Jews are Israel, have they ever formed a multitude of nations? Genesis 17:4 "As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, And you will be the father of a multitude of nations.
>>23244 Soooo Adam was an Indian? Makes sense; Asiatic and came through the middle east. Weird but okay. >White Means Red In what world? And Jews do have a slight reddish skintone look at Bernie for instance. >Eber and Iber >Eber Yeah just because words sound similar doesn't mean they are the same. Hibernia is the classical Latin name for Ireland. The name was taken from Greek geographical accounts and the Roman Historian Tactius in his book Agricola (98 AD). Hibernia (hi-ber-nia) Where do you see Eber (ay-ber). They aren't even similar names; Hibernia comes from Greek and Latin roots. And Eber doesn't even mean what you say it means. It means "to come over" or some silly shit. >Iber Not a Hebrew word as far as I can find. And again Iberian from Greek Iberes. Iberes; Iber; Iber River known as Ebro in English and Híber; Iber and Ibros in Latin leading to it's current name Ebros (pronunced the same way). Iberians were defined as "people living south of the Ebros river" Thus Iberians.
>>23233 Well I mean look at Egypt. Blacks have been claiming that for centuries when it was clearly white or at the very least Middle Eastern. Some blacks even say they are the "true Isrealites" it's hilarous. Look up "Black Hebrew Isrealites" my fellow Nigerian and prepare to be amazed.
>>23192 Not to mention how illogical his claims are. First he goes on to claim how Judaism got plagiarized from whites, then argues how it's very different for a long time (to try to dodge the question how almost everything about it perfectly matches the kike psyche while being highly incompatible with white/Aryan values), then uses the same, supposedly corrupt beyond recognition religion to "show" how whites are da real Jews (das rite!). He is just some rabbi trying to throw a giant pilpul ITT. Daily reminder that their goal always was to conquer nations by cultural conquest, and that every man must follow their god, completely renouncing his native religious and cultural heritage. This CI shit is no different from (((Christianity))) itself, they are trying to sell the same poison under the "we were poisoned from the start" guise since they figured out that /pol/ is traditionalist leaning. You will very likely find the same shill try to sell Judaism to "progressives" by presenting it as something new and fresh, a better paradigm compared to those pesky pagans (it was literally anudda shoah!).
>>23197 >Furthermore even Ireland in the past was called Hibernia, again after Eber and Hebrews. It was a variation of Indo-European "Hyper" referring to it's geographical location From Ancient Greek ὑπέρ (hupér, “over”), from Proto-Indo-European *upér (“over, above”) (English over), from *upo (“under, below”) (whence English up). Cognate to super- (from Latin). Nothing to do with subhuman tribe of (((Habiru))) Habiru (sometimes written as Hapiru, and more accurately as ʿApiru, meaning "dusty, dirty"[1]) is a term used in 2nd-millennium BCE texts throughout the Fertile Crescent for people variously described as rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, bowmen, servants, slaves, and laborers. >When the Phoenicians colonized Spain they called it Iberia Hence the Latins called a book (l)iber, which signifies the inner bark of a tree; and the Greeks used the word ome; (Phloios), which also means bark. See also CORDED WARE CULTURE; INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES; ... Thus, Lat /iber'bark, bast', which was used for writing before the advent of papyrus . But let's look for another, more likely possibility: Eber-Nari (Akkadian, also Ebir-Nari), Abar-Nahara עבר-נהרה (Aramaic) or 'Ābēr Nahrā (Syriac) was the name of a region of Western Asia and a satrapy of the Neo-Assyrian Empire (911-605 BC), Neo-Babylonian Empire (612-539 BC) and Achaemenid Empire (539-332 BC). Eber-Nari roughly corresponded with the Levant (Syria region), and was also known as Aramea. It means "Beyond the River" or "Across the River" in both the Akkadian and Imperial Aramaic languages of the Neo-Assyrian Empire (that is, the Western bank of the Euphrates from a Mesopotamian and Persian viewpoint). It is also referred to as Transeuphratia (French Transeuphratène) by modern scholars. The province is also mentioned extensively in the Biblical books of Ezra and Nehemiah as עבר הנהר Evver Hanahar. Additionally, sharing the same root meaning, Eber (pronounced Evver) was also a character in the Hebrew Bible from which the term Hebrew was widely believed to have been derived (see: Eber), thus the Hebrews were inferred to have been the people who crossed into Canaan across the (Euphrates or the Jordan) river. It seems much more reasonable to assume that the people from that region (Phoenicians) used the same term for two completely unrelated regions. "Across the River" could also refer to Straight of Gibraltar, which is separating Europe from north Africa. Then it remained as a geographical term, according to which the people living there were named. Aryan (Celtic) people, nothing to do with Habiru.
>>23244 >First he goes on to claim how Judaism got plagiarized from whites, >then argues how it's very different for a long time (to try to dodge the question how almost everything about it perfectly matches the kike psyche while being highly incompatible with white/Aryan values), Did you not understand what I said? Why do you have to lie? Who is the real Rabbi here? I told you very simply that The Edomites plagiarized White identity. Period. They obfuscate and change what it means to be "Jew". It's really that simple. None of their values match ours, because they are not us. The Talmud is a bastardization of the Torah. Not to mention modern Christianity, which is completely kiked beyond belief. Yes, it is imcompotabile with White Aryan values. WHY YOU GOTTA LIE? Why do you have to attempt to twist what I said into something that wasnt said? Incredible. >then uses the same, supposedly corrupt beyond recognition religion to "show" how whites are da real Jews (das rite!). He is just some rabbi trying to throw a giant pilpul ITT. Why you gotta lie rabbi? Why you gotta lie? You dont paraphrase, you dont quote, you just throw bullshit out onto your computer, whatever fits your narrative, huh rabbi? The truth has already come out. The truth is out, Rabbi. This is our heritage - White people are Israel.
>>23233 So you go on to completely ignore what I say and just ramble on like a moron going on about Indians, about how Bernie is red (lol) and about you focus on particular language (rubies) even though you originally claimed red was middle eastern? I...just cant take you seriously. Sorry bud. I provided you ample evidence, but you just ramble on and on with your own ideas. Yet I provided you sourced evidence from reseachers far smarter than you and I. I can't say you provided me the same... oh wait a minute, what you are providing are mainstream narritives, shaped by the very kikes that you so-called hate so much. Why are you spreading this false narrative about Whites? Why are you denying the glory of our civilization? Let me ask you this...if the Jews are Israel, have they ever formed a multitude of nations? Genesis 17:4 "As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, And you will be the father of a multitude of nations. Again, if the kikes are Israel, where are their multitude of nations? Where? Where are they? Oh wait, the Israel tribes just, poof vanished, the "lost" tribes of Israel. We all know you're the kike here.

Delete
Report


no cookies?