If you feel I missed to respond to something you feel is important, you are more than welcome to point it out, it is not on purpose.
> Talking to Nazis like you is always a blast.
Ok, cool, way to go, what a serious first impression you make by starting off with sarcastic subtle insults.
> Lets just assume for the sake of the argument that 100% of CEOs and elites are jewish.
Irrelevant assumption, but sure.
> Jews still don't run the world, simply think about it it really takes 5 minutes to think how stupid this Nazi garbage is.
Strong claims with no explanation, overt insults, belittling language.
> Jews control the world is so stupid its the most stupid X people control the world. Yes dumber then reptilians control the world.
Irrelevant and outrageous comparison, bold claims without justification, more insulting jargon.
Ok, first of all Nazism means National Socialism, and the Nazi interpretation of socialism ( according to Hitler and NSDAP ) is not to confuse with Marxist socialism but similar in some regards.
The Jewish Question is but one tiny, almost irrelevant fraction of a Nazi ideology, there are libertarians, bolsheviks, communists and social democrats who take issue with the Jews and Zionism too.
>Here is what you just admitted in this conversation.
<jews run the world
<jews don't run the world
>Once basic questions are asked Nazism collapses into self contradictory nonsense.
Unfair and biased paraphrasing of what I said, a straw man argument, more one liners without clarification.
What basic question?
What argument collapsed?
Where is the contradiction?
Why are you implying Nazism is sorely based upon the Jewish Question?
>Think about what you have written and how utterly devastating it is to the Nazi position you write:
<jews don't run the world
>Yet you insist
<jews run the world
I see no contradiction what so ever in what I wrote.
What I do see is that you seem to see the world in absolute terms, black and white, no nuances.
By this point I suspect you are trying to imply that Jews cant control something, unless 50-100% of all Jews support it?
You know what, in most EU countries, no single party gets more than say 35%-40% of the vote, yet they rule the country, usually in a coalition.
Does this mean the ruling party does not rule the nation, due to not having 100% support?
>What is a jew? If only 0.001% of jews are in positions of power and do this then you are admitting that jews don't run the world.
Ah, here we are, as I suspected.
If Jews hold around 70% of important positions in media/culture, that means, more than a majority of those people are Jewish, thus Jews control those institutions.
Even if there were 6 000 000 000 000 Jews living in Antarctica that we just discovered, the figure 70% remains the same.
There are still 1.5% Jews in America.
Jews are still over represented by a factor of about 40 or 40 000% in important positions of power.
If everything was balanced they should hold 1.5% of those positions. But if we account for nepotism, slightly higher intelligence and what ever contrived excuses one wants to use, we can be generous and say 5% of those positions.
In most peoples understanding, the word "control", pertaining to politics, implies holding a majority, or a substantial amount of something, alternatively running things behind the scenes.
When 1.5% of the population hold more than 50% of key positions in several institutions, they are by definition "controlling" them.
If the US green party with 2.2% of the vote held 70% of key positions, I would say "The green party controls institution X".
>Explain to me what you understand to mean under jews. Go on. Because if only a tiny minority of the entire jewish population are doing this and 99% of jews don't know about it or are not in on it then jews don't run the world genius.
I use the same definition for Jew as Jews themselves do, because I don't see myself as being in a position to classify people as Jews or not.
The formal definition as I understand it is at least a Jewish mother.
What defines a Jew is subscribing to a relevant part of Judaism and its teachings I guess.
>Yes this is how dumb Nazi shit is.
More insults, gee I am really persuaded by you intellectual remarks.
So far, NOTHING you said is really relevant to the ideology of National Socialism, what you call "Nazi".
You are making false assumptions and false equivalences in almost every statement.
This is dishonest and will not really lead anywhere.
To be continued...