The reasons I like NWS Minarchism:
1. It allows for racial separation without giving the anti-whites and Jewish supremacists some bogeyman to blame (white nationalist government authoritarianism), by having it come out of the cumulative effect of choices made by private individuals and businesses, so that when separation occurs, it is the people's own damn fault (and thus it has a lasting effect by providing numerous examples that teach people about why and how racial separation occurs out of pragmatic/practical and rational/reasonable responses to small-scale racially-linked issues/problems).
2. It kills the welfare state by ending governmental roles in all forms of charitable enterprises (welfare, healthcare, education, social security, etc.), forcing private individuals and businesses to fill in the gap, and causing people to become more compassionate for one another in their daily encounters since they can no longer claim to have "done their share" to help their fellow man by dint of being forced paying taxes, it also makes the receiving of charity conditional instead of guaranteed, forcing needy individuals to have to at least pretend to be somewhat decent rather than giving them a license to be complete dickheads knowing that a check is always going to be in the mail. Finally, it removes any chance of politicians counting upon welfare-reliant populations for seizing the holing power, and returns their duties to the interests of those people whom their nation was initially intended to serve.
Ending the government's role in education will fulfill the dual purposes of returning the family to it's proper form (the mother at home with children while the father works to support the unit), an removing children from the care of complete strangers with alien political interests, it also might fill a third role of cutting down on self-imposed social isolation or externally-imposed social dysfunction that comes with forcing children into the company of a (somewhat) random sampling of their peers for five days a week.
3. A simple system of domestic civil law based upon the foundation of the NAP makes it easy to intuitively know what separates a legal and illegal action (legally requiring the informed consent of an individual or business to any physical interaction with their physical person or physical property, and only to the extent that this informed consent continues to be given by the owner), it also has the benefit of legally prohibiting neonatal circumcision, and abortion, if human life is defined as beginning at the union of a human egg and human sperm. By making this set of laws unable to be added to, subtracted from, or otherwise altered, authorities will no longer have the leeway to abuse their powers for the purpose of social engineering or to serve political corruption. Punishing the authorities for intentionally failing to enforce the laws an protect the people from it's violations will prevent them from selectively choosing who is worthy of the sworn sacrifice of their lives.
4. Abolishing the legal concept of "intellectual property" (such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets) will be the death knell for any existing corporate, media, and academic monopolies that exist, and which currently serve the anti-white agenda.
Totally abolishing the government's role in policing any form of expression in any capacity is going to be a massive blow to any force the benefits from the control of information and it's expression, while degenerate media such as pornography and any media that records the perpetration of a crime (such as child pornography) would be legal under this system, the absolute freedom of all acts of expression that result from the total loss of government jurisdiction to involved itself with non-aggressive crimes (such as "hate speech", "unauthorized assembly", "incitement", and yelling fire in a crowed theatre) completely justifies this sacrifice (BTW, the reason the government has to be completely unable to involve itself with speech is because all of the censorship today slowly crept it's way up from "common sense" laws that regulated legal speech, such as those against CP, and the only way to prevent this from occurring again is by completely shutting the door to government being able to say anything about what information we are permitted to expose ourselves to or to expose to others, besides, just because the recording of a crime is no longer legally prohibited as being contraband media, doesn't mean that the recorded crime itself is made any more legal, doing porn will be defined as a form of prostitution, and anyone involved in the production of CP is still going to be either guilty of child sexual assault/rape, or a willing accomplice to it, let hell come to any who would harm/corrupt a child or deprive them of their entitled period of innocence, we can also hit them with a charge of enslavement on top of the child abuse charges).