/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, News, History


[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply Return
Säge
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.


02/27/20 IRC/Matrix/and Discord servers are now available, join here.
02/09/20 /ausneets/ has been added!
11/23/19 Donations can now be made via PayPal, thank you for all of your support!
11/21/19 We have successfully migrated to LynxChan 2.3.0, to see all of the changes to 16chan, click here.


[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(49.09 KB 971x546 Dmx4MA0UYAER5Ea.jpg)
Non-Whites are the real NPC's Anonymous 02/11/2020 (Tue) 20:02:58 ID:cd2ce4 No. 22702
They are different. ALL non-whites with the save exception of a few anomalies. Maybe 1%. 2%. But the vast majority of them are like this. I don't know how to describe it. It is a difference not only in looks, but in behavior, and something else. It's like they are lacking something. I don't know exactly what it is, but I can best describe it as a state of being. All Non-whites. Blacks, Hispanics, Asians. Even Japanese in some respects. White people are on a different level, mentally and spiritually. That's as best as I can describe it. This level allows us access to additional faculties that other nonwhites cannot access. I don't think this is just IQ and smarts. It's something else. No, don't go telling me its IQ. There is something more to this. Something spiritual. Non Whites are the real NPC's. I feel an unease around them. I feel that something is off. You do too. And its for all nonwhites. Something is just off with them, something is off center, something is just NOT RIGHT. I don't know how to describe it. But it turns them into NPC-like characters in this clown world that we live in. Only Whites display certain characteristics like independent thought. I think this independent, critical thought is being suppressed by TPTB. But we have it. This critical thought manifests itself in what they describe as "Conservative", "Libertarian" or whatever else they want to label our ideals as. The ideals that are in these realms of thought are primarily "White People" ideals. I fully subscribe to the idea that all civilization has been built by Whites. NO ONE, EXCEPT WHITES have built civilization. And the funny thing is that nonwhites want to be around us. They follow Whites. Wherever we go, they want to go, too. I dont want to be around nonwhites. The only nonwhites I feel safe around are ones that have significant White admixture (some Latin, basically). All others I cannot stand, and want to get away from as soon as possible.
Most whites are also NPCs, maybe not to the same extent, but it's delusional to think otherwise.
>don't go telling me it's IQ it probally is >it's something spirtual Druid /pol/ is the next door to your left. Scroll up and you'll see it. I do know what you mean though, blacks seem so empty most of the time. Especially the older ones, some of th younger ones have learned to mimick and don't seem so... but it's werid. Might be a combination of IQ, MOAA and the domestication genome which results in less socialization? There also is the fact that blacks straight up don't have as much empathy for other races like we do. Maybe the majority are pyschopaths? Think about it, morals come from civilization. You don't do things that are bad for it because it's bad for the civilization as a whole and in the long term bad for you. But what about a race that isn't smart enough to see the long term, and never had any real civilization execpt for a short while in Ethopia (which hardly counts).
>>22707 Seems so. The blacks I deal with are usually just surface level pleasant. no real exchange of ideas, just the "sup mane". The IQ is interesting to me, not being much brighter mind you. What goes on in an empty mind? Is it like a rap video? Memories of meals and sex? Again I'm even hesitant to post here do to my bad brains but I just can't fathom having nothing going on upstairs.
>>22715 We all have "bad brains" here don't worry, it doesn't take that high of an IQ to realize negros aren't equal to us. Alot of blacks are "tribal", if they are weak and see you as strong (or they want something) they will asskiss and be nice. And if they are in a majority white group they mimic and try to "act white" to fit in. Just look at old style blacks, they are like a parrot in clothing and mannerisms. Don't be fooled though, they are still niggers no matter how they dress and will always fall back to their natural habits around other blacks. The "smart" ones are very anti-white as they realize what their existance is doing to whites but they don't care. They realize quite correctly, it's us or them. And the dumb ones will go with anything that gives them gibs. This is why Democrats so eaisly sway them. I honestly don't think they are smart enough to even understand higher ideals of any kind. What goes on in their brain is probally very little simplified thoughts... I doubt they have an inner voice or think of much other than "Muh Dick" on constant repeat. It's weird to think about.
>They are different. I don't know how to describe it. It is a difference not only in looks, but in behavior, and something else. It's like they are lacking something. I don't know exactly what it is, but I can best describe it as a state of being. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAoNhacojmM
>>22702 I had a chance to observe negroes in their natural habitat, and not for a moment did I feel like I'm interacting with human beings. They completely lacked the spark of higher consciousness, acting no different from highly functional animals. Same applied to a lesser or greater extent with other non-whites. The difference was even greater with the kikes, they did not even feel like animals, but like machines/insects. Complete absence of self-awareness/sapience, of mind. A creature acting entirely on it's hard-coded programming, a lot of it being allocated to mimicry of human beings. You can usually notice this by looking at people's eyes, with kikes it's usually a completely blank state, something is missing entirely. Think of it in terms of computing, public consensus has very little understanding of how the human mind (actually) works, especially since certain types of research have been sabotaged by kikes for a very long time, and certain narratives were being pushed by the same vested (((interests))). IQ could be seen mostly as processor speed and memory capacity. But then you also have radically different processor architectures, instruction sets, etc. which often make them specialized for different things or general purpose. Kikes were designed with sole purpose of preventing the higher consciousness to arise in mankind, meaning that their processors are highly efficient in, well, kikery and general subversion/parasitism, while either completely lacking the capacity for anything else, or, being awfully inefficient in it. It goes something like this: IQ (raw processing power combining memory capacity and clock cycle speed) x [certain utility/instruction set efficiency] = Result (The sum of which gives actual intelligence) A typical nigger has low IQ, and very limited (animalistic) instruction sets. A higher IQ nigger is just a more capable animal. IQ alone does not make you any more "human" , the way your brain is wired does. A higher IQ kike (the so called "smart" Jew) would have high IQ and extremely limited instruction sets (even less than a nigger), making him extremely efficient in certain areas (such as subversion, deceit, parasitism) but completely lacking any utilities which would give rise to the Self, creativity, taste, values, or higher understanding. Meanwhile, an Aryan with the same overall IQ would possess all of those, but he would fall prey to the Jew due to being less specialized and more of "jack of all trades" intelligence-wise. >>22715 >The blacks I deal with are usually just surface level pleasant. When they are acting "nice" , they are only doing so because it increases their chance for survival. The dogs are instinctively acting the same, so retards think how their dog "loves" them, while it's only loving the food and protection it's been given. A dog doesn't understand you, it's even incapable of seeing you as a person, not to mention contemplating abstract concepts like love, how the hell could it love you? You will often notice the same type of mentally defective people (SJW's for example) being both subhuman and animal lovers. I remember reading about some kind of mental disorder that children sometimes have, manifesting in them being unable to recognize that their dolls are not people, way past certain age. This is probably the root cause of SJW/egalitarian phenomenon that kikes are exploiting to the fullest.
>>22752 I agree with you wholeheartedly, 100%. I absolutely think there are anomalies, 1-3% of the population maybe, but they will fall into the greater genetic mesh once Whites become a minority. The real question is this: What is the game at play here? What's going on? Why is the world like this? These are big question, and they really need to be answered. The problem is that our history has been subverted, there are lies upon lies, so we really dont know the truth. Do we really come from Europe? Do we all really come from apes? Here is the interesting thing: Whites are the people that seem like a fish out of water. NOT the other races. Whites are the unique bunch. Without Whites, the world would devolve into chaos, or at least a chaotic state in which highly intelligent beings (Kikes) would be able to grasp even further control. Which is exactly their plan through Agenda 2030 and the use of advanced technologies. Where did they get this technology? Its obvious that its being slowly released to the public. So whats going on here? Why are all of the races of the planet like highly functioning animals, but save Whites? Why are we unique here? I'm not sure if you heard about Christian Identity. It's very interesting. They hypothesize that Adam is actually the first White man. The GOD of the Bible - not Jehova, "Yahweh", perhaps - created Adam, the first White man. Adamites are considered separate from the other earthly races. It's a fascinating theory. "Dust to dust" is for the races of Man. Man =/= Adamites (White People). It is suggested that Whites are actually eternal beings, and when we die, our spirits regenerate in "Heaven". There is no heaven or hell (more Jews lies) but rather it depends on your state of being. So what's our purpose here? What's the purpose of all this? Are we here to free the earth from a kind of evil? More and more its becoming clearer than there is this kind of malevolent force on this earth that seeks total control. Are we here to free earth?
>>22761 You're trying to astroturf hebrew theology on an anti-jewish platform once again. You did it before when in a previous thread you were going on about how the Old Testament is amazing and makes for solid morals and how modern jews are either imposters or severely degenerated from the ancient israelites. Then someone told you how not amazing the torah is and how it was partially ripped off from neighboring regions and how it is still filled with anti-Gentile screeds. The real question is, what's your purpose for sneaking in hebrew theology sympathy, and why are you pushing christian identity, which has been roundly rejected as nonsensical, fakeloric (Tribe of Dan = Danes, Brith = Brit, Isaac's son = Saxon, etc.), and has been shown to have jewish and freemasonic origins? >Man =/= Adamites (White People) Whites aren't men/human? Thank you for your theology, rav. You're also completely delusional if you think that 90% of whites aren't "NPCs" just like you accuse the muds of being.
>>22761 It's been covered many times here, race is about potential, not predestination. While the majority of whites are actualized as NPC's, white race has the highest (by a very wide margin) chance to spawn PC's, while for the animal-men and genetic robots (kikes) that chance is minimal. >Why are all of the races of the planet like highly functioning animals, but save Whites? >I'm not sure if you heard about Christian Identity. It's very interesting. Mate, you should stop grasping at straws and take the Serranopill already. >It is suggested that Whites are actually eternal beings, and when we die, our spirits regenerate in "Heaven" A certain portion of whites at least. One gets to recognize those throughout life.
>>22783 > You did it before when in a previous thread Mate, this is my first time making a thread here, and I've only posted here a few times. My intentions are just to talk about race, and my personal observations. I just mentioned Christian Identity because its something I stumbled upon and I find what they say fascinating. > (Tribe of Dan = Danes, Brith = Brit, Isaac's son = Saxon, etc.), and has been shown to have jewish and freemasonic origins? Is that true or a myth? They claim that the Israelites are actually Whites, and that the entire Bible is dedicated towards Whites - and that Freemasonry was originally Aryan in nature, only to be subverted by "Jews." (who are also imposters) Your post is accusatory. There is another thread in here entitled "How do we attract more people to our forum?" If you are going to accuse people right off the bat and act in a hostile manner, then no one is going to want to post. Some people reported being banned just for talking about things mods didnt like. >While the majority of whites are actualized as NPC's, white race has the highest (by a very wide margin) chance to spawn PC's, while for the animal-men and genetic robots (kikes) that chance is minimal. I agree with you here somewhat, but at the end of the day, you're going to want to stick with Whites, are you not? In fact, everyone wants to be with Whites. >Serranopill What's that?
>>22797 >>(Tribe of Dan = Danes, Brith = Brit, Isaac's son = Saxon, etc.), and has been shown to have jewish and freemasonic origins? >Is that true or a myth? No one is this stupid. No one actually thinks that Isaac's son = Saxon. >They claim that the Israelites are actually Whites, and that the entire Bible is dedicated towards Whites - and that Freemasonry was originally Aryan in nature, only to be subverted by "Jews." (who are also imposters) Why do you continue to capitalize jew? >Mate, this is my first time making a thread here, and I've only posted here a few times. You didn't deny making the previous posts I was talking about. Your choice of words and grammar structure are the same, like your consistent use of the word fascinating. >Your post is accusatory. <Oy vey, don't notice patterns and point out repeat shills, goyim! >Serrano Another fruity spook.
>>22797 >What's that? Miguel Serrano, he covers those topics to a great extent, without reverting back to Judeo-Christianity (just recognizing some of it's ancient elements). I can post some of his books if you are interested. There were a lot of shills astroturfing Christian identity in here (and other chans) so certain people are quick to jump to conclusions and assume you are one of them. The part about capitalizing the word Jew is just laughable, to think that you are somehow making a statement and harming them by not capitalizing their name lol.
>>22816 You get that kike shit off my board right the fuck now. God, just call yourselves "Postive Christans" at least. This "Anglo-Isreal" shit makes me vomit in my mouth. This is why National Socialism needs to remain a secular folkish movement. No Satanism, Paganism or Judaism. It can only lead our heads into the clouds and our movement astray by presupposes ideas instead of hard facts. We are a movement based on reality and the natural law, not religious lies.
>>22811 CI presents ample evidence that Whites are descendents of Israel, and that Israel itself is actually White. The Bible itself is for White People and is entirely about blood lineage. The whole Bible is about preserving Aryan genetics. But you wouldnt know that because you are so terrified of kikes and Jews, anything that doesn't have a Swastika on it and it's somehow subversion. Lul. This is a discussion forum. If you aren't willing to hear and talk about new ideas, you can fuck on off. This is the whole point of discussion, fucking retard Snowflake. Like anything else other than NatSoc and you dicklets get triggered. Same for >>22824 as well. Whats ironic is that CI is more nationalist than Nat Soc. In fact CI people claim that Hitler knew about CI and that National Socialism is simply a derivative of CI. CI Lite, essentially.
>>22824 Who said anything about Anglo-Israel? I'm just showing that guy a less poz'd alternative to CI since he seems to be interested in those subjects, genuinely or not. >This is why National Socialism needs to remain a secular folkish movement Didn't claim otherwise. But this thread is not about political organization, it's about why most non-whites act like animals or NPC's. He is showing a religious perspective, others are showing a more secular one. And yes, I'm fully aware that CI is a kike subversion, but there is no reason to lash out at everyone before verifying it's a shill. >>22831 >Like anything else other than NatSoc and you dicklets get triggered. Aaaand, here it goes. Verified. Gotta give them a benefit of the doubt first, but they can't help themselves after a while
>>22702 Only Whites have souls
>>22831 CI has nothing to do with National Socialism it's a kiked religion more akin with the (((KKK))) then anything else. It's not more "nationalistic" it's dumb and if Hitler knew about it, he would of done the normal thing of laughing and then forgetting about it.
(47.44 KB 96x96 avatar8603_1.gif)
>>22824 Why do you want to be the Jew? What's wrong with being white and having traditional European religions instead of some kike Eastern abomination? Seriously, is y'all want to BE the Jews you'll meet the ovens too.
>>22702 I'm not really sure what the point of this OP is.
>>22832 >Preserving Aryan genetics is Kikery >>22863 That's literally what they say in CI. Only Whites have souls. "dust to dust" applies to non whites >>22882 Go on Christogenea. You can also go on Bitchute. There's a whole load of pro White content and it all links back to CI. Israel is originally White. Like everything the kikes subvert and steal. Isn't it obvious the real Chosen Ones are Whites? Think about it. They are the ones stealing from us.
>>22890 "The real chosen are whites" No we aren't Semites and that doesn't even make sense. It was "Abraham's Blood" that are the chosen ones and the guy was a kike. Not to mention why would you want to be the "Chosen One" we aren't niggers or kikes so this whole parastic old testament is alien to our race and directly harmfull. Jesus Christ, Wodan and Svarog. Do you listen to the words coming out of your mouth?
What this guy said >>22882 Why would you want to be kikes? When I read the Talmud I am disgusted and think "What a disgusting race of people" not "Oooh I want to be a KIKE we are the real chosen people!!". CI kikes should get the gas chamber, I mean there is being a kike by birthright and then choosing to be one. Ew.
>>22890 Relying on some retarded semitic religion to "preserve" the white race can only have dysgenic effect on it over time, spiritual kikes turn into physical kikes after a while. But that's not the goal of (((CI))) in the first place, the goal is to get ethno-nationalists to embrace christcuckoldry and then gradually poz them until they start praising godly niggers, worshiping kikes and kissing refugee feet. Just as Christianity itself was devised by a bunch of kikes as a memetic weapon/psyop against heathen Europe. Jesus probably never even existed, and if he did, most accounts point to him being a kike, or a mischling at best. Certainly not a role model for Europeans. Unlike semitic rats who had to somehow reconcile their utterly subhuman qualities with their superiority complexes, we don't need to be (((chosen))) by some sand demon to have a sense of superiority, it's rather obvious and self-evident. All we need to do is to follow the eternal laws of nature.
>>22707 >Maybe the majority are pyschopaths? No, they're animals. Animals don't give a shit about other races/species. You only see this happening with domesticated animals. Whites are domesticated. We need to return to roots. Violence.
>>22907 >Jesus Yeshua
>>22811 Don't you capitalize Germans, Hindus, Christians, Swedes?
>>22899 >>22907 You guys are completely off your rocker, lol. Christian Identity =/= juedo Christianity. You really have no idea what you're talking about. According to CI the Bible is all about White Peoples lineage. It has nothing to do with Jews. The Jews are actually the Edomites the sons of Cain with cursed blood of the fallen angels. Just look at the chapters of the Bible. All of the names especially on New Testament are White people names. Lol. John, Peter, Matthew... Lol. At first I just listened to people like you but then I went on Bitchute and I realized that you guys are either really stupid or agents working a Psyop on here. All you do is mindlessly bash kikes and any discussion that veers from that you can't handle. You're just irrelevant and not productive for the movement.
>>22991 You're not fooling anyone.
Abraham was not a kike. Of the descendants of Abraham, Semites are the descendants of Shem and Jews are the descendants of Judah. Semites aren't a race. I'm not necessarily agreeing with what you're calling CI, but if we're going to use biblical terms, we should at least accept their biblical definitions.
>>22991 Real good advertising. I'm Christian Identity now.
>>22995 At best he was a descendant of the people who survived the local flood around the Black Sea and that's it. The tales, they don't fit chronologically, probably a lot of what is said about the man is Biblical BS.
>>22991 You want to be Jews and want to subvert Judaism so you can instead the chosen people. You're right, in some regards you are worse than Jews since you deicided to become one of them. >>22995 Semites are a racial groups and Caabites and the tribes of Isreal where all part of that. Abraham was a Jew.. he is the father of all Jews are you joking? You can't be serious, Moses (his great grandson) is also a Jew by the way.
>>23014 No, Abraham and Moses are White
>>23017 Yeah and the sun is a heating lamp. Nice try at a troll; too obvious.
>>23020 But that's he message of CI. Abraham and Moses are White. Abraham made a Covenant with God and that Covenant created Israel. The Israelites left the Middle East and went over the Caucus to Europe. It kinda makes sense when you think about it. Only White people were able to build civilization... We are people of the Covenant. Makes sense to me, anyway...
>>23021 He was born in the city of Ur in Babylonia according to the mythos. He's not white and Semites have existed for a long time. Also why do you guys want to be kikes so bad? The people of the covenant are abhorrant even in the old testament. They are parasites and thieves a lazy race of disgusting semites. CI is truly trash and anyone who tries to join any movement while partaking in it should be spat in the face of and then turned away.
>>22991 > All of the names especially on New Testament are White people names. Lol. John, Peter, Matthew... Lol. The Hebrew name "מַתִּתְיָהוּ" (Matityahu) was transliterated into Greek to "Ματταθίας" (Mattathias).[2] It was subsequently shortened to Greek "Ματθαῖος" (Matthaios); this was Latinised as Matthaeus, which became Matthew in English Low quality bait >The Jews are actually the Edomites the sons of Cain with cursed blood of the fallen angels. Or was it the other way around :>) >>22995 >Abraham was not a kike A guy who not only fucked, but also pimped out his sister to various rulers so that he can extort shekels from them and bring their nations to ruin was definitively not a kike. Such a righteous character could have only been a white man. >>22997 This, at last I truly see. I'm going to the synagogue to convert tomorrow. I've been denied my Jewish heritage long enough. >>23021 >Only White people were able to build civilization... The same people who got attacked and pushed out by the (((people of the book)))
>>22702 wow what a data set you have anon,I am Indian, do you seriously think we want to have a third world? Hitler in his early speeches talked some stuff about how India has different caste for different people, we had a social order which was mostly based on anthropology I guess I am a non white, heck near to Jiddu Krishnamurti phenotype, he is a Tamil Brahmin I am Telegu, I know you wouldn't care but in your perspective its like a Polish and Slovak guy with difference in some gene components, I consider myself privileged because I had internet computer while this was a socialist shithole and I ended up in chan, I had questions back then I am a autist in /pol/ sense,I know exactly what is going on with the world all the NatSoc literatures, everything posted here in 16ch. https://indiachan.com/pol/res/39718.html I know for the fact that the Jewish banking system landed our country to the state we are in along with Muslim and British invasion, we are in this ride together anon there are high IQ anons here who don't want to go anywhere and wants to fix this shithole, I can understand your tribal hate, but damn.
>>23040 If you weeded out your most bottom castes and racial muck you might be better off. The problem with India is that it was never meant to be together and was only forged together because of the Raj. Even the Mughals didn't reach so far. And you have been splintering slowly, but there is clearly one superior Indian race that must assert its self if you are to be homogenus and a powerfull. India would be a stragetic ally in some regards as they are abbuting the sandy underbelly of China. But going through Tibet and the Himilas would be suicide for any army. We might have similar enemies but we can't pretend we have similar goals. And I won't pretend like your race is at all anything but inferior to mine; that would be a lie and a spit on the face of my own. Once the dust has settled we must stand apart.
>>23014 All I'm saying is that the bible itself says some pretty similar things about "jews" as do many of us. I find it interesting that the bible is very concentrated on genetics and lineage, and goes to great lengths to describe them. The events also fit much better historically than I had realized until recently (I'm not religious). When the bible refers to jews, it's specifically referring to the kingdom of Judah, who consist of maybe 3 of the 11 tribes of Israel. It describes them almost exactly as the degenerate subversive merchant we see today. It says they were jealous that they were not the children of the covenant, which leads them to attempt to conceal and rewrite history to make it look like they are. We're god's chosen, don't ya know. Why is it that jews reformed their "holy land" and named it Israel? Shouldn't they have named it Judah, or Canaan? I don't necessarily believe all of that, but I don't disregard it either. As someone who wasn't very familiar with the bible, I found it to be much more interesting from a jq and natsoc perspective than I ever would have imagined.
>>23017 Jesus too lol. kys faggot
>>23035 You people still don't get it. According to CI Hebrew is White. That is why they say the "Jews" stole everything from us. Hell the term "Jews" is a derivative of Judeah, which was one of the tribes of Israel. I've spent some time on here and this forum is a sad state. Everyone is so afraid of the Jews you cannot see the truth... They stole our heritage from us. The Bible is about White lineage and bloodlines. Terminology alluding to that is right in the beginning when Adam the first White man was created
>>23117 Can you explain then why the Old Testament wasn't written in Indo-European languages?
>>23117 The Old Testament is the adventures of people with a lower moral standard than the Trailer Park Boy's. Raping and being general parasites in all the land they inhabit much like today. >Jew comes from Judea Really? Wow I didn't know that... Jews come from one of the semetic tribes of Isreal (Caanites were also semetic). My mind is blown. Ahem "And the Son's of strangers shall build up thy walls (U.S payed for and helpt build Isreal's new wall), and their kings shall minister onto you. For in my wrath I smote you, but in my favour I had mercy on you." Isaiah 60:10 "Therefor their gates shall open countiually and they shall NOT BE shut (souhnd familar?) day nor night. To bring onto you the forces of the gentiles and their kings." Isaiah 60:11 "For the nation that will not serve thee shall perish; yea those nations shall be utterly wasted." KJV Isaiah 60:12 Sounds like a bunch of White guys am I right my fellow goyim?
>>23157 >Taking Bible verses out of context Yeah these aren't cheap shots at all
>>23163 >quotes the whole verse >out of context God is that your only defense ever? The Bible has no meaning what so ever and the words are nonsense apparently.
>>23163 "For the isles shall await me, and the ships of Tarshish first to bring thy sons from afar, their silver and their gold with them, unto the name Jehovah thy God, and to the holy one of Isreal for he has blessed the" That's the quote before it, I don't want to see you so much as quoting someone unless you quote the whole chapter that quote was in. It's not out of context and notice how Tarshish (Meaning lands away from Isreal in some verses and the Greeks in others) gentiles (all non Jews) are all used? This applys to everyone goyim.
>>23165 Jehova is the false pretender God of the Jews. Yahweh is The God of Adam and Abraham. The Bible is all about bloodlines and lineage which is why they spoke about opening the gates and building walls. Yahweh was extremely hostile towards all non Whites and very protective of his children (Whites and Greater Israel) And Israel tribes = Whites. You can go ahead and watch 100 reasons the Israelis were White by truthvids if you actually want to have a productive discussion. But I'm sure you're just here to bash the Bible, take verses out of context and say "ha! Told ya so". You already have your mind made up so what's the point.
>>23165 Actually scratch that I think I'm wrong about Jehova, I think it's one and the same with Yahweh. Regardless "the Father" is the Father God of Whites Gentiles are all non Whites
>>23166 So your argument is that I took a "verse" out of context. I gave the context so I didn't. You still have no argument. How are Jews White. Explain in your own words.
>>23167 >Gentiles are non-whites Gentile comes from Hebrew. The word stems from the Hebrew term goy, which means a "nation". The plural article "goyims" comes from "ha-goyim" which refers to any "nation" outside of Hebrew. The Hebrews are non-whites. Goyim means non-Hebrew. Gentile comes from Hebrew. Whites are included in the Gentile defintion.
(180.74 KB 580x580 tribes-heraldry.png)
>>23168 >>23170 >>23168 For CI, the whole Bible must be taken into account from a certain perspective and understanding. When you quote these things, you think that they are talking about the modern day Jews, when in reality, the Bible is essentially a history book for Adamites and their descendants, the children of Israel (that's us). It's a book purely about race. Modern day Christianity has little to do with CI. CI is simply the understanding that it's not about religion, it is about heritage. >How are Jews White. Just by asking this question, shows that you are either not reading what people have been writing here, or you still dont understand the whole point of CI. "Jews" as you know of them - the people who follow the Talmud - are NOT WHITE. Let's make that really clear. They are not White. What they did was steal the IDENTITY of Whites. They say THEY are Israeli. They are not. White people are technically Israeli. The 12 tribes of Israel are WHITES. They are all WHITES with slightly different altered attributes. This is why you have "Diversity" within White peoples' Look at the picture I attached. What does this look like? Medieval heraldry. These are the 12 (technically 13) tribes of Israel. So when you are talking about the Jews, you are talking about the Edomites and the sons of Cain, infused with the blood of demons (fallen angels). Remember that in reality we're talking about the top maybe 1% of Jews having this blood, like the 13 bloodlines. The rest are possibly mongrelized similar to the Arabics, which is why so many of them show sings of genetic degredation. Yes, White people are indeed the direct descendants of Adam. Whites are the ONLY PEOPLE to build civilization. Which is why White skin is revered throughout the world. All civilization was built by Whites, no exception. We still see some evidence of this day in India, with a very few Elites showing Caucasian traits, even though most have succumbed to genetic corruption. Yahweh was hostile towards other non-whites, and he hated the Canaanites and Edmoties (sons of fallen angels). That's because he knew what they would do if they ever gained power, which is what is playing out right now. THEY are fulfilling the Bible prophecies because they are absolutely compelled to do so by Satan. >The Hebrews are non-whites. No, the Hebrews are Adamites, which are Whites. Are you starting to see the bigger picture now? In fact there are root words and names for European landmarks and regions in more modern day languages (I forget off the top of my head) that basically directly translate into Hebrew. It's pretty damning evidence that the Hebrews were just White People... So you see how this all lines up? Even so-called "Pagan" religions, essentially stemmed from the same bullcrap that the Edomites worshiped - false idols. The Edomites want paganism, they want idolatry. Yahweh was all against that, Yahweh was Pro-Heritage, and did not want people giving away their energy to demonic entities, which is what Paganism is all about. You see remnant of Aryan/Adamite heritage in so-called Pagan religion like Ragnarok, for instance. It's the same thing as Revelations, just re-branded.
So gentile is goy which means non-Hebrew. >inb4 The Hebrew's were White! Ignoring the Torah let us look into the foundation of the modern day Jewish parasite. Tracing it back we find the Isrealites. A confederation of Iron Age SEMETIC speaking tribes who inhabited a part of Caanan (Caananites being semetic) during the tribal and monarchic periods. Modern Jews get their name from the southern ISREALITE Southern Kingdom of Judea. Yes Hebrews are non-whites. They are a semetic people from modern day Palestine. Yes the Torah was written in Hebrew. Yes Gentile means Goy which means any non-Hebrew. Yes the people of the Torah are the most vile and basless beats whom's tactics ressemble modern Jews in every way. No they were not white. "I will set Egyptian against Egyptian: Brother against Brother, Neighbor against Neighbor and City against City." Isaiah 19:2
>>23171 Why was the Torah written in Hebrew? If it is white. Why did it use a non-white language. Why not some early Germanic or Runic language.
See this is where I think you are here to either spread disinfo or just troll, because you have not acknowledged anything I have written. Are you a troll, a bot? Who knows... First of all, let's establish the fact that Hebrews are White People >A confederation of Iron Age SEMETIC speaking tribes who inhabited a part of Caanan (Caananites being semetic) during the tribal and monarchic periods. True in the broadest sense >Yes Hebrews are non-whites. FALSE, HEBREWS ARE WHITE! >Yes the Torah was written in Hebrew. Yes the Torah was written in Hebrew language, but the actual Hebrews did not write it. >Yes Gentile means Goy which means any non-Hebrew. True, Goy means any non-Hebrew. Which means any NON WHITE >Yes the people of the Torah are the most vile and basless beats whom's tactics ressemble modern Jews in every way. True >No they were not white. True There we go.
>>23173 Just stop b4 I end up wanting to gas myself. Oy vey already.
>>23173 >Why was the Torah written in Hebrew? Why do we have the English version of the Talmud? What kind of logic is this? So if something is written in a particular language, makes it theirs?
>>23174 Hebrews... they come from Judea. Judea was part of a Semetic confederation in modern day Palestine. Jews come from Judea and still speak Hebrew and modern day reformed Isreal. Hebrew is non-white. Hebrew is non-white and middle eastern, How is it white kek. >>23176 False equivlant It was originally written in Hebrew. Hebrew a language that comes from the Caaniante group of languages who themselves are a branch of North-Western Semetic Languages. Hebrew comes from Caanite languages the Caabites you agree and semetic. Hebrews and Caanite are both semetic. Hebrews are non-white.
>>23174 Wait what actually back up. You believe that the Torah is non-white and that those guys are non-white. But you think Hebrews are white. What. Explain.
>>23165 >>23177 Are you this fucking stupid? He just explained it to you. Fucking robot. You repeat the same shit like a retard
>>23179 Read what I said abpve that were I debunk all that he said. Hebrew started from Judea who are non-white. He's the only one repeating that Hebrews are white without any backing. Are you this stupid you cannot read?
Like >Hebrews are Adamites This makes no sense. The "Adamites" aren't a race. They aren't white or non-white.
(104.97 KB 540x459 1vzD1iN.jpg)
>>23177 >Hebrews... they come from Judea. False. Judea was simply the region that primarily belonged to Judah, one of the tribes of Israel. >Hebrew is non-white. No, I dont know how many times I have to repeat this until you understand. Hebrews are White People. Hebrews are Israel, and Israel is White People. >Hebrew is non-white and middle eastern, No. Hebrew is White. You do know that the Tribes of Israel MIGRATED OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST, RIGHT? YOU DO KNOW THAT? AND WHERE DID THEY GO? Well, God told them that they will Migrate NORTH WEST of their location. Whilst the children of Israel did conquer and settle in the lands of Canaan, it was prophesied that they would eventually have a new home. This home was to be to the north, to the north west. Which countries are northwest of Palestine? Well all the countries within Europe of course. From all the dispersions during and after the Exodus, the children of Israel gradually spread into, colonized and conquered Europe. It is obvious that Israel can only be the white Europeans and their new home was Europe and from there all the other white Nations over the world which were founded by the European people. "Behold, these shall come from far: and, lo, these from the north and from the west; and these from the land of Sinim." Isa 49:12 "In those days the house of Judah shall walk with the house of Israel, and they shall come together out of the land of the north to the land that I have given for an inheritance unto your fathers." Jer 3:18 "Behold, I will bring them from the north country, and gather them from the coasts of the earth, and with them the blind and the lame, the woman with child and her that travaileth with child together: a great company shall return thither." Jer 31:8 >False equivlant The logic is sound. Just because something is WRITTEN IN A LAGUAGE, DOESNT MAKE IT THE NATIVE PEOPLES' LANGUAGE. YOU OF ALL PEOPLE, should know this, because the JEWS are PARASITES and they adapt to whatever ENVIRONMENT they are in. >You believe that the Torah is non-white and that those guys are non-white. But you think Hebrews are white. What. Explain. Literally Jews. This is what the Jews do. The answer is right in front of you. For some reason, you're so retarded that you understand the Jews subvert and adapt, but NOT IN THIS INSTANCE? Think, use your brain.
>>23181 When God created the first ever man in His image and His likeness He called him Adam for a reason. The name Adam comes from the Hebrew word ‘aw-dam’ which has a special meaning. It means to 'show blood in the face', 'to flush', 'to turn rosy' or 'to be ruddy'. Only the white race has red rosy cheeks, is capable of blushing and can show color in the face. since all the Children of Israel, descended from Jacob (Israel), from Isaac, from Abraham, from Shem, from Noah and all the way back to Adam. If Adam was white and ruddy, and Eve was made from Adam, would it not be obvious that their descendants and the Israelites must also have been white and ruddy just like all of their ancient forefathers. "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." Genesis 1:27
>>23183 GENESIS = Genes
>>23180 Holy fuck Judea is White you robot. You are so focused on nomenclature you are avoiding everything else. The Jews just plagiarized. That's all they did. Almost all of modern day Palestine belonged to Whites at one point and the whole land was fertile. When Whites left what happened? That's why the middle east modern day is a fucking shit hole. Whites left and now it's gone to shit. It's also why they erected modern day Israel there it's a giant fuck you to Whites. Fucking robot.
>>23178 The Torah was written by Edomites the modern day "Jews" as usual they were a minority and they wrote in the host language... Which was Hebrew. Get it now. They did the same shit as they always do. They are parasites.
>>23182 Because they live in Europe does not make them white. There are many Jews that have migrated into Europa even before the Roman Empire as well as Gypsies and the like. The Torah was written in sixth century B.C at the latest. Europeans were already in full swing at that point and had inhabited those lands for a millenia. This doesn't make sense. I mention Judea because as far as any historical knowledge is known that's the Kingdom it came from desecnding from Caanites and various Asiatic languages . And what the Jews wrote the covenant and the Torah. But it was actually made for white people but the Jews lied... while writing it and inventing the story in the first place? Ah okay what? I guess it does come from Oral traditions and a oral god but that God which Yawhew is from is more Moloch than Perun. Infact El can refer to Moloch, Hadad or Yahwew. Yawn
>>23187 >The Torah was written in sixth century B.C at the latest. Europeans were already in full swing at that point and had inhabited those lands for a millenia. At the latest. What doesn't make sense? None of what you said disproves or proves anything. Yawn. >But it was actually made for white people but the Jews lied Where did I say that? Where did anyone say that? Are you stupid? Why are you just making up shit? The Torah was written by Jews, for Jews. What's so hard to understand? >Yawhew is from is more Moloch than Perun. Infact El can refer to Moloch, Hadad or Yahwew. You are really confused....
>>23187 >Because they live in Europe does not make them white. What the fuck are you talking about? We're talking about the tribes of Israel going to Europe and colonizing it. Yes, it makes them White. Are you serious here? Really dude?
>>23189 >>23190 He's not here to discuss, it's a disinfo agent. Trust me. See how he ignores what you say and just tries to paraphrase bullshit? He's here to spread disinfo. Doesn't want the word getting out. So he will purposefully misinterprete.
>>23189 Torah is made for Jews by Jews. So why are you quoting it? This means your whole argument about Jewish migration means nothing since it's all base on the Torah and is reffering to kikes. I have a feeling you are a Jew with how much you are flip flopping your argument. The Torah is the old testament and the book of Isaiah and Jermiha (both of which you just quoted) are included in that... and which you horribly misquoted kek.
>>23190 I said "Torah was written in the sixth century at the latest" okay so the Tribes of Isreal migrated around that time. Since that's what the Torah says. The book which you are quoting. European civilization was already in full swing. So this doesn't line up does it?
The tribes of Isreal never conized Europa that was clearly prophetic and more ressembles what the Jews are doing now.
>>23192 > So why are you quoting it? I apologize. I thought you said the Talmud. This is my mistake. The Talmud was written by Edomites. The Torah was indeed for Israelites, (White People) We dont know when the Torah was written. We know the latest date (as you said, 6th century) but we dont know much else. I'm not exactly sure this proves or disproves Whites living in Europe? Here, let me give you some clues on the languages.. When the Phoenicians colonized Spain they called it Iberia, which translated means Hebrew Land or Land of the Hebrews. Why would theses Spaniards call it that unless they were Israelite Hebrews? Israelite’s would often refer to themselves as Hebrews. In Gensis we learn that Abraham was referred to as Abraham the Hebrew. and in the book of Jonah even then many many centuries later he refers to himself as a Hebrew. “And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew; for he dwelt in the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol, and brother of Aner: and these were confederate with Abram.” Genesis 14:13 “And he said unto them, I am an Hebrew; and I fear the Lord, the God of heaven, which hath made the sea and the dry land.” Jonah 1:9 The words Hebrew comes from Eber who was an Ancestor of Abraham and the Israelites Furthermore even Ireland in the past was called Hibernia, again after Eber and Hebrews. The great city of Carthage, literally means ‘New City’ in Hebrew. This all shows that white Israelite’s were colonizing Europe for centuries long before the coming of Christ.
>>23186 Nah he is correct youre probably confusing it with the Talmud
>>23197 The Jews did not write The Torah. The Torah was written by White Adamites, but we dont know much else.
>>23199 Ok you asked this: >>23173 >Why was the Torah written in Hebrew? >If it is white. Why did it use a non-white language. >Why not some early Germanic or Runic language. This question makes no sense, because I explicitly stated that the Bible, the whole Bible is about White People. This includes the Torah. And I stated that the Hebrews are Adamites in an earlier post. >>23171 However you pretty much ignored what I said.
>>23200 And I asked you to define the word "Adamites" as it is not currently a race known to man. The Torah and the New Testament are sperate works. The New Testament was written in Greek the Old One (ana the Jew one) was written in Hebrew. >Iberia No, it comes from a Greek word which in turn comes from the name of the River Iberos in Iberia. >Carthage Carthagians were not white and infact was a heavily semetic empire that relied on mercanary troops. That's not an example as it is A) Not European and B) Already known as an Empire with Semetic roots. >Abraham Abraham was Jewish along with his lineage Moses and his kind. He was born in Ur and lead the Isrealites and became the "original Jew". He and his kin are as Jewish as it gets. Oh and "Hibernia" means the "Land of Winter" in classical Latin and comes from the word "Hibernius". Which means "Winter".
>>23117 This isn't a forum you fucking newfag. Lurk 2 years. Also, learn to understand the point of religions, like how semitic religion is the complete polar opposite of any and all White European views.
>>23203 >And I asked you to define the word "Adamites" as it is not currently a race known to man. I broke that down in another post. Here I'll repeat it: The name Adam comes from the Hebrew word ‘aw-dam’ which has a special meaning. It means to 'show blood in the face', 'to flush', 'to turn rosy' or 'to be ruddy'. Only the white race has red rosy cheeks, is capable of blushing and can show color in the face. since all the Children of Israel, descended from Jacob (Israel), from Isaac, from Abraham, from Shem, from Noah and all the way back to Adam. If Adam was white and ruddy, and Eve was made from Adam, would it not be obvious that their descendants and the Israelites must also have been white and ruddy just like all of their ancient forefathers. "Adamites" are White people, effectively without genetic degradation. We are the descendants of Adam. >No, it comes from a Greek word which in turn comes from the name of the River Iberos in Iberia. "Iberia" translated means Hewbrew Land or Land of the Hebrews. Hebrew = Whites. >Carthagians were not white and infact was a heavily semetic empire that relied on mercanary troops. Semites are Whites. I'm not sure why Mercenary troops are related to the conversation. By saying that Carthage was "Semitic" (whatever the hell that means) you are actually supporting the idea that non Whites can build civilizations. Let's make it clear here, non Whites cannot build proper civilization. There is no evidence of that today. And it didnt happen back then, either. Or do you believe that they can build a civilization like Carthage? Really? Fake history. You believe in fake history. Carthage means "New City" in Hebrew - literally. Carthage was White. >Abraham was Jewish along with his lineage Moses and his kind. No, Abraham is a descendant of Adam, the first White man Hibernia comes from "Eber" and the Hebrews. Eber is an Ancestor of the Israelites. White People.
(79.75 KB 500x756 3pq954.jpg)
>>23203 pic related...when you think about it, when did it ever make sense that non whites can build anything? With the exception of the Japanese, maybe?
(1.16 MB 1459x463 scrnli_2_19_2020_9-55-59 PM.png)
>>23203 Ancient Israel flourished, because it was ruled by Whites. What happened to the promised land that was given to Israel. Why is it now but a desolate desert? What happened? The Bible clearly describes it as a beautiful lush country the children of Israel were being brought to. “For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys and hills; A land of wheat, and barley, and vines, and fig trees, and pomegranates; a land of oil olive, and honey; A land wherein thou shalt eat bread without scarceness, thou shalt not lack any thing in it; a land whose stones are iron, and out of whose hills thou mayest dig brass.” Deut. 8:7-9 A further description of the fertile lands of Galilee, Perea and Samaria during the time of Josephus: “…for their (Galilee) soil is universally rich and fruitful, and full of the plantations of trees of all sorts, inasmuch that it invites the most faithful to take pains in its cultivation, by its fruitfullness: accordingly, it is all cultivated by its inhabitants, and no part of it lies idle. Moreover, the cities lie here very thick……by the richness of their soil…” “…But for Perea……yet hath it a moist soil, and produced all kind of fruits, and it’s plains are planted with trees of all sorts, while yet the olive tree, the vine, and the palm tree, are chiefly cultivated there. It is also sufficiently watered by torrents, which issue out of the mountains, and with springs that never fail to run, even when the torrents fail them, as they do in the dog days.” “Now, as to the country of Samaria….made up of hills and valleys, and are moist for agriculture, and are very fruitful. They have abundance of trees, and are full of autumnal fruit, both that which grows wild, and that which is the effect of cultivation. They are not naturally watered with many rivers, but derive their chief moisture from rainwater, of which they have no want; and for those rivers which they have, all their waters are exceedingly sweet: by reason also of the excellent grass they have, their cattle yield more milk than do those in other places…” Book III, chapter 3.2-3.4 of war Once the Israelite’s left those region we find the lands declined rapidly. Yet wherever the Israelite’s formed new Nations they transformed them into beautiful, lush lands as God promised they would do. ....because the Israelites are White.
(76.41 KB 400x339 salvia-officinalis.jpg)
>we wuz jews and sheet being pro-white is great. thank you for your service. please stop with the jew stuff, even the "good" jew stuff. >CI militias and communities are great but the beliefs are fucking garbage
>>23207 Everyone is descended from Adam according to the Christan Mythos (unless you are a pre-adamite) and Jews might be swarthy but they can still blush. Red men have been used to refer to White people but that's a bit of a strech considering ruddy has also been used to refer to tanned skin. And doesn't deny anything even if it's true? I guess you could say that means that Adam was white so all his children are? But that's a weak argument and I doubt that's what the authour is implying and doesn't negate the fact it was written in Hebrew and Hebrews are infact sand men. An ancient fiction book doesn't negate that. >Genghis Khan (Mongols) >Darius I (Persians) >Janaab Pakal (Mayans) >Bäbur (Mughals) Non-Whites can form civilizations just not as good of ones. And no ancient Isreal wasn't a "good society". It was just another sand nigger tribe just it happened to be semetic. >Iberia What are you talking about with any of these. A simple search for the root defintion of these words prove you wrong as I already have. Hibernia Land of Winter Comes from Hiberus meaning Winter, where hibernate also comes from and is associated with winter. Learn your Latin or at least Ancient Greek please. None of these names have Hebrew origins.
Infact Adama means "earth" or "soil" in Hebrew since you know... Adam was mad of the dust. So your "ruddy argument" ,if you can even call it that, doesn't make sense.
>>23211 >Everyone is descended from Adam according to the Christan Mythos The Christian Mythos is Communism and Satanic. >Jews might be swarthy but they can still blush. That's because modern Jews have mixed with Caucasian blood. At the time of Adam's creation, the world was filled with non Whites and they could not blush. >But that's a weak argument and I doubt that's what the authour is implying and doesn't negate the fact it was written in Hebrew and Hebrews are infact sand men. Hebrew language = White. Not sure how many times I have to say that. >Non-Whites can form civilizations just not as good of ones. None of those are true civilizations, gimmie a break, what a joke. None of them can compare to the glory of White Nations. Nearly all of the "civilizations" you listed were ran by savages. The history books gloss over many of the savage natures of these civilizations and makes them out to be much nobler than they are. while lowering the glory of White civilizations. Again, communism in action. "Everyone is a child of God". No, only Whites are a child of God, and only Whites go to heaven. The others go to "dust". Dust to Dust. >What are you talking about with any of these. A simple search for the root defintion of these words prove you wrong as I already have. Why you gotta lie? Pic related.
(37.78 KB 460x413 WhitePersiansandGreeks.jpg)
(1.46 MB 2919x1993 Xenophon Hellenica 3-4-19.jpg)
>>23211 And Persians were Whites. A scientific restoration of the original color in ancient Geek sculpture. Here we have a battle scene between Persians and Greeks. The Persians here are exactly as the ancient historian Xenophon described them in his Hellenica.
>>23212 Yes, but it also comes from the term "aw-dam". (to blush). Adam was made from the dust, but he was breathed the "breath of life". The "breath of life" is codeword for a higher level of consciousness that only an Adamite body can hold.
>>23212 “MY BELOVED IS WHITE AND RUD­DY..." (Solomon's Song 5:10) "Nazarites (See Matthew 2:23) WERE PURER THAN SNOW, THEY WERE MORE RUDDY IN BODY THAN RUBIES..." (Lamentations 4:7) THE HOLY BIBLE IS THE BOOK OF ADAM'S RACE AND ADAM WAS A WHITE MAN. The implications of this presupposition are as follows: FIRST: Since the Holy Bible is the Book of Adam's Race, it means that the White Race of Adam was made the custodians of the Sacred Scriptures [not the Jews]! The White Race was given the stewardship of Divine Truth. IT IS THE BOOK OF THE RACE OF ADAM, NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS! It does not belong to the other races, for they have and will receive their blessings through the Race of Adam. "And in thy [Abraham's] seed shall ALL THE NATIONS OF THE EARTH [other races] BE BLESSED..." (Genesis 22:18)
>>23214 Carthage was the only one I didn't disagree with since Carthage wasn't even White and is historical semetic. Nice Cherry Pick. Look up the defintions of "Hibernia" and "Iberia" both non-semetic orgins >Hebrews White No, bad meme 0/10 Langage comes from semetic tribe and Caabites. >Semetic. >Non-White. >"Ruddy" Adama means "earth" or "soil" reffering to the fact he was made from that. >Blah blah civlization Yes case in point. Isreal was a non-White civlizations non-whites can still make them they just aren't as good and infact some are stablized like the Mughal or the Ottoman's until the end. >Ruddier in their body than Rubies Rubies?! So Adam was middle-eastern in skintone. You can't back out of that. Rubies are bright red; that's past the point of mere blush and denotes a darker or "tanned skintone" as Adam means in Arabic.
All this conversation and quotations are doing is making me realize Christanity is more kiked than I thought. Thanks for the red pill.
(58.70 KB 608x608 Im the jew now.jpg)
>>23221 No kidding... I have dealt with a few CI people online and they go to great lengths to claim that WHITES were the "real" Jews and Jews fake. The stupid.... Soon it will be blacks saying they are the whites now....
>>23220 > Carthage wasn't even White and is historical semetic. Carthage was White >Adama means "earth" or "soil" reffering to the fact he was made from that. And "Aw-dam" means ruddy, to blush, why are we going around in circles? You pretty much ignore every point I make unless you can find some way to subvert it. It's almost as if you're a Jewish agent trying to suppress the truth. >Look up the defintions of "Hibernia" and "Iberia" both non-semetic orgins Iberia: https://www.cbcg.org/booklets/america-britain/chapter-eight-israel-migrates-to-the-north-and-west.html the area northeast of the Black Sea, across the Caucasus, “came to be known as Iberia, confirming the presence of Hebrews from the ten tribes in that region.” As Chapter 9 brings out, the Israelites had long before given the name Iberia to an old Phoenician Israelite colony in Spain—hence, the Iberian Peninsula. Collins adds: “The appearance of the same Hebrew name (Iberia) in the region north of Armenia verifies that this region became an area of Israelite resettlement” (The “Lost” Ten Tribes of Israel—Found!, p. 129). Iberia means “land of the Hebrews” and comes from the word Hebrew itself, Ibriy, which stems from Eber, progenitor of Abraham. Hibernia: The fact that Danite explorers were from a very early date familiar with the British Isles—and most likely established at least a few colonies among the Isles—would prove vital to Israel’s long-term survival after the Assyrian captivity. As a key element in the fulfillment of the Abrahamic promises, these Danite pioneers opened the way for later exilic Israelites to follow to the northwest. Just as significant, however, was the fact that both Iberia and the British Isles received a major influx of Israelites—mostly from Dan and Simeon—just prior to the fall of Samaria. Collins notes that by the time of Samaria’s fall in approximately 722 BC, many Israelites had voluntarily migrated out of Palestine in an effort to avoid captivity. He writes: “Much of the tribe of Dan apparently sailed as far as Hibernia (modern Ireland) in their effort to [avoid Assyrian captivity]. Their arrival in considerable force in Hibernia as the Tuatha de Danaans is recorded in the early histories of Ireland.” (Note the similarity between Hibernia and Iberia, which both originate from the Hebrew Eber or Iber; Tuatha de Danaans means literally the “tribe of Dan.”) He adds that “large contingents of the Israelite tribes of Dan and Simeon (the Danaan and the Simonii) sought refuge in Ireland and Britain after abandoning their old homelands [in Palestine] to the Assyrians…. [Consequently,] many of the succeeding waves of Celtic [overland] migrations to Britain … were also Israelites in search of a permanent homeland.”19 Indeed, for Israelites seeking refuge following the Assyrian captivity, any Phoenician or Israelite colony could have served as a new homeland. It is only logical to conclude that Israelites migrating out of the Middle East would have been well aware of these preexisting Israelite colonies in the British Isles. Furthermore: 19. Collins, pp. 122, 125. According to Fell, “the oldest Gaelic name for Ireland is Ibheriu”—which clearly resembles Iberia and Hibernia. He adds that migrant peoples commonly carried the name of their former homeland to a new homeland (p. 63). Thus, we can see why Iberia (“land of the Hebrews”) was anciently attached first to the Iberian Peninsula and later to Ireland—as well as to the Caucasus region, which migrating Israelites briefly settled. https://www.cbcg.org/booklets/america-britain/chapter-nine-the-tribe-of-dan-trailblazing-pioneer-of-israel.html I am providing you references with links. Can't say you've done any of that yourself...but that's what Jews do, they lie and subvert. >So Adam was middle-eastern in skintone. Rabbi, people with red skin tone are commonly referred to as Amerindians. They were described as being White. You can't concede because you're Jewish. :) >making me realize Christanity is more kiked Modern Christianity is kiked. But here is a video of Hitler the Great on Christianity; https://www.bitchute.com/video/Jn1rvyxWG2Tj/
>>23223 The Whites are not the "real" Jews. If you met any real CI people, they would not have attested this. Its your perception and confusion around Jews and Israel that needs to be fixed.
Let me ask you this...if the Jews are Israel, have they ever formed a multitude of nations? Genesis 17:4 "As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, And you will be the father of a multitude of nations.
>>23244 Soooo Adam was an Indian? Makes sense; Asiatic and came through the middle east. Weird but okay. >White Means Red In what world? And Jews do have a slight reddish skintone look at Bernie for instance. >Eber and Iber >Eber Yeah just because words sound similar doesn't mean they are the same. Hibernia is the classical Latin name for Ireland. The name was taken from Greek geographical accounts and the Roman Historian Tactius in his book Agricola (98 AD). Hibernia (hi-ber-nia) Where do you see Eber (ay-ber). They aren't even similar names; Hibernia comes from Greek and Latin roots. And Eber doesn't even mean what you say it means. It means "to come over" or some silly shit. >Iber Not a Hebrew word as far as I can find. And again Iberian from Greek Iberes. Iberes; Iber; Iber River known as Ebro in English and Híber; Iber and Ibros in Latin leading to it's current name Ebros (pronunced the same way). Iberians were defined as "people living south of the Ebros river" Thus Iberians.
>>23233 Well I mean look at Egypt. Blacks have been claiming that for centuries when it was clearly white or at the very least Middle Eastern. Some blacks even say they are the "true Isrealites" it's hilarous. Look up "Black Hebrew Isrealites" my fellow Nigerian and prepare to be amazed.
>>23192 Not to mention how illogical his claims are. First he goes on to claim how Judaism got plagiarized from whites, then argues how it's very different for a long time (to try to dodge the question how almost everything about it perfectly matches the kike psyche while being highly incompatible with white/Aryan values), then uses the same, supposedly corrupt beyond recognition religion to "show" how whites are da real Jews (das rite!). He is just some rabbi trying to throw a giant pilpul ITT. Daily reminder that their goal always was to conquer nations by cultural conquest, and that every man must follow their god, completely renouncing his native religious and cultural heritage. This CI shit is no different from (((Christianity))) itself, they are trying to sell the same poison under the "we were poisoned from the start" guise since they figured out that /pol/ is traditionalist leaning. You will very likely find the same shill try to sell Judaism to "progressives" by presenting it as something new and fresh, a better paradigm compared to those pesky pagans (it was literally anudda shoah!).
>>23197 >Furthermore even Ireland in the past was called Hibernia, again after Eber and Hebrews. It was a variation of Indo-European "Hyper" referring to it's geographical location From Ancient Greek ὑπέρ (hupér, “over”), from Proto-Indo-European *upér (“over, above”) (English over), from *upo (“under, below”) (whence English up). Cognate to super- (from Latin). Nothing to do with subhuman tribe of (((Habiru))) Habiru (sometimes written as Hapiru, and more accurately as ʿApiru, meaning "dusty, dirty"[1]) is a term used in 2nd-millennium BCE texts throughout the Fertile Crescent for people variously described as rebels, outlaws, raiders, mercenaries, bowmen, servants, slaves, and laborers. >When the Phoenicians colonized Spain they called it Iberia Hence the Latins called a book (l)iber, which signifies the inner bark of a tree; and the Greeks used the word ome; (Phloios), which also means bark. See also CORDED WARE CULTURE; INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES; ... Thus, Lat /iber'bark, bast', which was used for writing before the advent of papyrus . But let's look for another, more likely possibility: Eber-Nari (Akkadian, also Ebir-Nari), Abar-Nahara עבר-נהרה (Aramaic) or 'Ābēr Nahrā (Syriac) was the name of a region of Western Asia and a satrapy of the Neo-Assyrian Empire (911-605 BC), Neo-Babylonian Empire (612-539 BC) and Achaemenid Empire (539-332 BC). Eber-Nari roughly corresponded with the Levant (Syria region), and was also known as Aramea. It means "Beyond the River" or "Across the River" in both the Akkadian and Imperial Aramaic languages of the Neo-Assyrian Empire (that is, the Western bank of the Euphrates from a Mesopotamian and Persian viewpoint). It is also referred to as Transeuphratia (French Transeuphratène) by modern scholars. The province is also mentioned extensively in the Biblical books of Ezra and Nehemiah as עבר הנהר Evver Hanahar. Additionally, sharing the same root meaning, Eber (pronounced Evver) was also a character in the Hebrew Bible from which the term Hebrew was widely believed to have been derived (see: Eber), thus the Hebrews were inferred to have been the people who crossed into Canaan across the (Euphrates or the Jordan) river. It seems much more reasonable to assume that the people from that region (Phoenicians) used the same term for two completely unrelated regions. "Across the River" could also refer to Straight of Gibraltar, which is separating Europe from north Africa. Then it remained as a geographical term, according to which the people living there were named. Aryan (Celtic) people, nothing to do with Habiru.
>>23244 >First he goes on to claim how Judaism got plagiarized from whites, >then argues how it's very different for a long time (to try to dodge the question how almost everything about it perfectly matches the kike psyche while being highly incompatible with white/Aryan values), Did you not understand what I said? Why do you have to lie? Who is the real Rabbi here? I told you very simply that The Edomites plagiarized White identity. Period. They obfuscate and change what it means to be "Jew". It's really that simple. None of their values match ours, because they are not us. The Talmud is a bastardization of the Torah. Not to mention modern Christianity, which is completely kiked beyond belief. Yes, it is imcompotabile with White Aryan values. WHY YOU GOTTA LIE? Why do you have to attempt to twist what I said into something that wasnt said? Incredible. >then uses the same, supposedly corrupt beyond recognition religion to "show" how whites are da real Jews (das rite!). He is just some rabbi trying to throw a giant pilpul ITT. Why you gotta lie rabbi? Why you gotta lie? You dont paraphrase, you dont quote, you just throw bullshit out onto your computer, whatever fits your narrative, huh rabbi? The truth has already come out. The truth is out, Rabbi. This is our heritage - White people are Israel.
>>23233 So you go on to completely ignore what I say and just ramble on like a moron going on about Indians, about how Bernie is red (lol) and about you focus on particular language (rubies) even though you originally claimed red was middle eastern? I...just cant take you seriously. Sorry bud. I provided you ample evidence, but you just ramble on and on with your own ideas. Yet I provided you sourced evidence from reseachers far smarter than you and I. I can't say you provided me the same... oh wait a minute, what you are providing are mainstream narritives, shaped by the very kikes that you so-called hate so much. Why are you spreading this false narrative about Whites? Why are you denying the glory of our civilization? Let me ask you this...if the Jews are Israel, have they ever formed a multitude of nations? Genesis 17:4 "As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, And you will be the father of a multitude of nations. Again, if the kikes are Israel, where are their multitude of nations? Where? Where are they? Oh wait, the Israel tribes just, poof vanished, the "lost" tribes of Israel. We all know you're the kike here.
>>23260 I was being sarcastic; Because it truly makes more sense for Adam to be Asiatic with that description than White. When I think of "Ruby skin" I don't really think of white. >Multitude of nations I mean they do own numerous nations in the exact way described in their holy book. Also it's fiction, just because it says something will happen doesn't mean it will. Like Relevations and dragons. Where is the dragons?? If we want to go into prophecies let's talk about Ezikel 26:1 in which God promises Tyre will be razed by Nebuchadnezzer... that never happened. It was surrendered with out "slaying all thy people by his sword" or the city being made to not exist. It still exists to this day so that's a lie. What about Ezikel 29:1-15 "I will make the land of Egypt utterly waste and desolate, from the tower of Syrene even unto the border of Ethiopia. No foot of man shall pass through it and no foot of beast shall pass through it for FORTY YEARS" Yeah that never happened neither as Egyptians "scattered among the nations" If you want to talk about false phrophecies in the bible we could go all day.
>>23244 To bad people actually believe it. Christan Identity is just another thousand reason we should seperate the movement from the KKK and other parts of the liberal and Christan right. There is no room in our movement for Christans nor Christan Identity. It's always something new with these guys from whining we shouldn't be violent to saying we are the real Jews. I'm starting to think they are to far gone and we should cut out losses before they drag us down. You see they believe in a book with Jewish origin. They don't think logically, all the Jew has to do is point out a piece of scripture and their bend over backwards to their demands. We can't afford that moral and stragetic weakness. If the Jew has no place in a movement, neither does the Christan.
>>23280 Christianity got concocted by a bunch of kikes in order to subvert heathen Europe, ideally it should be completely abandoned. But this poison was designed to entrench deeply into one's psyche, making the process of removing it rather difficult. The whole "Jew" thing is retarded, redundant and harmful. We don't need those myths, we don't need those values, we don't need false gods or their "favors" . We are perfectly fine on our own, with the gifts the nature has bestowed on us. >They don't think logically, all the Jew has to do is point out a piece of scripture and their bend over backwards to their demands. Those people will believe anything, first Israel is for white people, then they "discover" how Jews are actually one of the tribes as well, but the good Jews who follow Torah, not those evil occult Jews of course, then you add a based nigger or two if he follows the scripture, and so on. This tactic is used to gradually kosherize beliefs which become too "problematic"
>>23040 >I know for the fact that the Jewish banking system landed our country to the state we are in along with Muslim and British invasion, we are in this ride together anon there are high IQ anons here who don't want to go anywhere and wants to fix this shithole, I can understand your tribal hate, but damn. It's easy to hate when Whites are clearly the minority on this planet and all is done to eradicate Whites, that we're told we're too numerous and we pollute, that abortion is cool, but then migrants are brought in because we don't make enough babies, when it's countries like China and India for example which are soiling the planet with air and water pollution and fucking like insects, demographics blowing through the roof.
>>23130 >Can you explain then why the Old Testament wasn't written in Indo-European languages? He can't. Too much anus bleeding if trying.
>>23157 >The Old Testament is the adventures of people with a lower moral standard than the Trailer Park Boy's. Raping and being general parasites in all the land they inhabit much like today. But OT also contains more elementary truths, rules of thumb and is much more patrician than the NT. But it's obviously very corrupt too.
Is(is) Ra El
You're asshole
>>23171 >So you see how this all lines up? Even so-called "Pagan" religions, essentially stemmed from the same bullcrap that the Edomites worshiped - false idols. The Edomites want paganism, they want idolatry. Christian churches are and have been filled with icons for eons. So much for idolatry! >Yahweh was all against that, Yahweh was Pro-Heritage, and did not want people giving away their energy to demonic entities, which is what Paganism is all about. Ancient White gods that were revered and useful before the Christian plague were enemies of the White people. How could I not see it before??? It makes so much sense! >>23172 >Tracing it back we find the Isrealites. A confederation of Iron Age SEMETIC speaking tribes who inhabited a part of Caanan (Caananites being semetic) during the tribal and monarchic periods. Don't you get it? They were Whites speaking in the tongue of thieves! >>23174 >Yes the Torah was written in Hebrew language, but the actual Hebrews did not write it WTF So Hebrews were white? No! As you barged in, HEBREWS ARE WHITE. Therefore the Hebrew WHO ARE WHITE!!!!1!! are not related to the white Hebrews who wrote the Torah. Elementary! >>23176 >Why do we have the English version of the Talmud? It's called a translation. Are you saying the Semitic Torah is a translation? >>23182 >You do know that the Tribes of Israel MIGRATED OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST, RIGHT? Where do you get that information from? From the Torah? [citation needed] >Well, God told them that they will Migrate NORTH WEST of their location. >it was prophesied that they would eventually have a new home. This home was to be to the north, to the north west. Where did He say that? Aren't you making shit up? Also, WHEN did they move? It would be interesting to compare this to what archeology has already unearthed about the various European people since the neolithic. > Isa 49:12, Jer 3:18 Huh, so they went north-west but then returned to the Middle East and conquered Canaan but then were told they'd resettle in Europe? Or does that mean we Whites have to return to Palestine now? >>23184 >GENESIS = Genes Pretty non sequitur. The word gene was created on the basis of the ancient Greek word gonos. It is a modern and very specific definition, whereas Genesis is itself deriving from the same ancient root but has a meaning that's closely related to this root as it's about creation in general. >>23186 >The Torah was written by Edomites the modern day "Jews" as usual they were a minority and they wrote in the host language... So they wrote THEIR history and legends in the language of their host. Tell me why we should care about what the Torah says if it's Jewish history? >>23187 >The Torah was written in sixth century B.C at the latest. Europeans were already in full swing at that point and had inhabited those lands for a millenia. This doesn't make sense. Correct. Considering the Hiksos interlude, it's a given that this Palestinian area already was cosmopolitan, with all the miscegenation this implies. Even Egyptians, who fell like they were invaded by these Hiksos, were already mixed. >>23189 >The Torah was written by Jews, for Jews. What's so hard to understand? Confirmation the Torah is not for us (that includes the parts of the OT Christians rely on). >>23190 >What the fuck are you talking about? We're talking about the tribes of Israel going to Europe and colonizing it WHEN?? >>23194 >European civilization was already in full swing. Don't be mean and don't confuse him more with false tales of numerous Whites tribes coming from the land north of Caucasus (now totally overrun by colored races). You're so mean!!!!!
>>23186 >The Torah was written by Edomites the modern day "Jews" as usual they were a minority and they wrote in the host language Same mistake.>>23197 57ed33 is cd2ce4. Way to generate self support in a debate faggot! > Furthermore even Ireland in the past was called Hibernia, again after Eber and Hebrews. Etymological fail. >The great city of Carthage, literally means ‘New City’ in Hebrew. :) >>23198 Hey look he's not me! (pathetic) >>23199 >The Torah was written by White Adamites And this is when we start quoting all the best pieces we find in the OT about the patriarchs who were paragons of virtue. Let's get this shit started! (somehow, already did by >>23035) >>23203 >No, it comes from a Greek word which in turn comes from the name of the River Iberos in Iberia. Bu-but then they named the river after the Jews Hebrews because they bathed in it!!! >Carthage was shit, Romans did nothing wrong Hey! Why do you continue with this fact bashing? Romans were corrupt and had to be saved by Christ btw!!! >Oh and "Hibernia" means the "Land of Winter" in classical Latin and comes from the word "Hibernius". Which means "Winter". Wait. Could that explain the verb to hibernate? It all makes sense now! WE ARE REDISCOVERING OUR TRUE ROOTS!! >>23205 >This isn't a forum you fucking newfag. >almost zero picture in THREAD Fucking bastard system. >>23207 >"Iberia" translated means Hewbrew Land or Land of the Hebrews. Hebrew = Whites. translated? LOL >Semites are Whites Aaaaand we have a winner! (aka Jews stole ALL the Semitic lore and sheeit) >No, Abraham is a descendant of Adam, the first White man Provide your evidence then. (he's quoting madly from the Christian Identity Support Group Compendium) >>23208 As if Jews couldn't pay White architects... >>23209 >Ancient Israel flourished, because it was ruled by Whites. Ever heard of climate change? Same shit happened on the Sumer area and North Africa. A long time ago, these places were greener. >>23210 >>CI militias and communities are great but the beliefs are fucking garbage They are non relevant in term of numbers.
>>23211 >Non-Whites can form civilizations just not as good of ones. See thread title, literally. For Central America, consider the ancient presence of Whites and their legens of White gods. Also the Golden Horde, what is there to be impressed about aside from ancient gooks invading Europe with numbers (what a surprise)? >>23214 >>Everyone is descended from Adam according to the Christan Mythos >The Christian Mythos is Communism and Satanic. Hello I'm CHRISTIAN Identity. I'm Satanic. (oh sh1t edition) >>23214 >Hebrew language = White. Not sure how many times I have to say that. Repeat it again please. With sauce too. >>23219 >Defending the Bible Dear Christian, I... >>23224 >Carthage was White EVERYTHINGS WHITE!!! >>23224 >https://www.cbcg.org/booklets/america-britain/chapter-eight-israel-migrates-to-the-north-and-west.html >Cites a quasi CI website to prove CI claim. Logical. (read the website's About section) >>23225 >The Whites are not the "real" Jews. And there he goes full retard Just consider the shit the quotation marks imply here. >"Jews" are not the real Jews? FFS >>23233 >And Jews do have a slight reddish skintone look at Bernie for instance. Ashkenazi Jews are a recent group. Their ancient Middle Eastern ancestors were not so whitened. >>23259 >I told you very simply that The Edomites plagiarized White identity. Period. You admitted that Edomites only wrote the Talmud, not the Torah. So all the very disgusting Jewish behaviors found in the Torah are Aryan, by your own admission. This is so fucked up. >>23273 >I mean they do own numerous nations in the exact way described in their holy book. They never fathered them though. The part in Genesis is obviously related to lineage, not insidious Jewish takeover. Our Aryan nations are nothing Jewish.
>>22824 >We are a movement based on reality and the natural law, not religious lies. <Imagine thinking there can be no religious truths and that National Socialism was totally secular.
Sorry, but I feel much the same about Western European Whites. You guys are gullible insectoids, your reasoning is wholly subservient to what you perceive as "morally correct"; you can be dissuaded from an obvious conclusion with as little as some bitch crying and calling you cruel, or some kids saying you're "cringe". And I've seen it working, I've seen "smart" White German or Anglo guys actually changing their opinion after getting socially lashed; it's not pretense, not cowardice and paying lip service, you can literally be reprogrammed, rationalizing "your" new "views". That's the essence of what you call civilization. Sans few exceptions like the rare misfits on these boards, you cannot think independently. You're self-domesticated. You stop at "repugnant" ideas, you can't be cynical just as you can't be resolutely idealistic; can't follow through. My own culture is very deficient in many respects, but we're so much freer and so much more serious internally. (I'm Russian). It feels empty talking with Eurocucks. I suppose their destroyed aristocratic elites, who actually built this wonder, were like my people, only more educated and intelligent. It's also plausible that you were much better before kikes learned to make use of your silly morality. Little of that is left.. >>22706 Correct.
>>23593 All religion is a lie, and all truths that might be taught in religion exist independant of religion. >>23588 Rome was fine until Christ came along; Christanity had nothing to do with it rise and even more to do with it's fall. See; Christcucks burning The Library of Alexandria. >uh they are christan so uh they are Romans!! Give me a break; I see no CIfaggot has provided any evidence contrary to the fact that Hebrews are kikes. Just repeating the same schizo lies.
>>23604 >All religion is a lie HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAno >all truths that might be taught in religion exist independant of religion. Perhaps but that does not make a religion a lie when said religion repeats the truths through its teachings >Rome was fine until Christ came along Not really. It was already going down the drain.
>>23634 Yeah? Christanity didn't help did it? >inb4 Roman Catholic preserving tradditon Yeah after the Franks invaded and claimed to mantle of "Rome". All Religion is a lie; How can you say no to that. God doesn't exist, Religion claims he does and that it's teachings are right because of it. Therefore religion is a lie. And any "truth" it may contain is a partial one as it doesn't have the "proof". Making it more of a distraction from the truth.

Delete
Report


no cookies?