>Are Scandinavians really as fucked up as /pol/ makes them out to be?
No. Most Swedes for example are unemployed and so aren't really migrant-loving at all, considering that the state does more to help migrants than it does to help them, a large portion of the population don't care about any kosher left or kosher right party. They aren't super feminised at all on a larger scale.
Scandinavia is so doomed for different reasons than feminisation. It's again, migrants coming from anywhere, said unemployment, incredibly high taxes, the lack of respect for philosophy, jews pitting the kosher left against the kosher right and many people actually playing into it. It's also that so many people are introverts, which destroys the integrity of the race.
>are all scandis the same
All countries vary, in many cases Norway was actually more accepting of migrants than Sweden for a time. I'd probably say Norway is the worst when it comes to this (not attacking the Norwegians as a people, but their current state), as they have both an anti-white left and a fervent Zionist bloc opposing it when it comes to these issues. Swedes don't buy into it as much as Norwegians do, nobody supports any party, even the NMR (which yes, is a fake honeypot literally trained by Putinist Russia, which is why they were able to become a party to begin with)
>On a power ranking scale how would you compare Scandis to Balts
Similar to Estonians, but Latvians and Lithuanians are typically better (not accounting for jews or the recent "Russian" immigrant population which is mostly just an Asiatic/churka infiltration)
Scandinavians are very similar to Czechs in a way, but not at all like South or East Slavs.
Scandinavians are essentially the same in this scale.
Very similar in ethnicity, but they're not the same politically, the UK has a far more left-vs-right approach on things.
Imagine the situation in Greece as everything bad in Scandinavia turned up to a thousand + the fact that Greeks are far more collectivist, and you'll know how the Greek mind is now compared to Scandinavia, they're not as wrapped up in the party dialectic as well (even GD is rejected by many as controlled opposition). The problem is that they still blame their problems on fall guys like Soros due to his presence in Greece. Italians and Spaniards are basically the Greeks but less extreme.
This is untrue unless you count certain Lapp admixture in northern Norway, such mixture in southern Sweden and Denmark is practically non-existent. The Uralics are actually another proto-European population, so Finnic admixture in general is not being "Mongolised".
>Uralic Finns Nordic but not Scandinavian
Because they're in northern Europe and had a close tie with the Swedes since the iron age, this is reflected in Norse texts themselves that do refer to the Finns (thus it precedes the Swedish crusade i.e. sanctioned massacre of the Finns). The reason why they're not Scandinavian is because they're not the same North-Germanic ethnicity as Norwegians, Swedes, and Danes, Uralics aren't Mongols, but they're still different to Scandinavians.