I tell you antifa are a minority, you insist on putting them full front.
You also claim they are anti-Zionists which is partially true and, in this way, in line with my argument. There are different varieties of antifas, a cursory research on internet will easily find you links showing that antifas can also be found in Zionist compatible forms and sometimes pure Zionist themselves as they vow to fight any discrimination, starting with anti-Semitism and therefore can push it to cover fight against anti-Zionism as being defined by a veiled form of anti-Semitism. On the other hand, in standing against oppression, and due to the origins of some leftist currents and schools of thought, certain antifas will actually denounce Zionism, notably for its imperialism. It's a mixed bag, it's a mess, but Zionists clearly try to control it since they all agree on being against... Fascists (that's us). Never the less, the Utoya gang had clearly demonstrated signs of being on the anti-Zionist side and you're being disgustingly dishonest in doing everything possible under the sun to deny this plain to see fact.
You focus on the leftist labour party being anti-white to avoid the evidence it held strong anti-Zionist positions. Obviously I'll be forced to provide links otherwise you will continue to deny this reality for the sake of your dishonest argument. If you could be bothered to read, which I doubt you can, you will notice that I didn't deny their anti-White stance. I however insisted on the fact that Zionists care more about defending global Zionist interests than enforcing anti-White politics. This is logical, it would be useless to them to support antii-White policies if the Zionist state and its projected power over western society were to fall.
You, however, super idiot as you are, still haven't been able to process this very simple fact. They are Zionist first, anti-White secondly, although the latter is obviously very close but will always come in second position.
So as I speak of the left, you completely distort my argument by, again, claiming that I said antifas would come to us. No amount of blatant strawman arguments will change my point. You can still see my post. You are the one dishonest rat here, not me.
You openly lie about Breivik killing pro-Jew leftists, this by trying to be clever in shifting from Zionist to Jew. But your attempt is a transparent one and a complete failure. I never said the leftists were anti-Jews, only that they were anti-Zionists. I said Breivik was on a mission to send a message, to educate the leftist golems who were going too far. Again, the links I will post will finally shut your mouth on this topic.
Breivik is the type of man used to push us towards supposedly pro-right wing activism that is compliant with Zionism, on the basis that we both protect our people and frontiers. One of the end goals of such a supposed tolerance of Zionists in the right-wing area is to actually maintain Jews in positions of power and considerable influence over what should be pure White Nationalism pushing for a removal of Jews. The other end goal is to act as a smoke screen to buy Israel time and make us forget what the true purpose of Zionism and Israel are: absolutely not friendly to Whites at all. Jews know they are a minority on this world, they want to avoid a global pogrom. They cannot allow true White Nationalists to rise to power because we will want justice if we do so, and they will pay for their crimes. Jews create and maintain the confusion, throw us into more sterile pilpul and they usually hijack the debate. They do this because they are in such power in our countries that they know true White Nationalists are silenced, so they so called friendly Nationalist Jews pretend defending our interests by talking in our name about our identity, rights and needs as White People.
Then you throw a few very cases of non-Whites, with pro-Jewish sympathies, among a vast majority of white and young people killed for their affiliation to a political movement that was clearly anti-Zionist. A few cases, as I said, of which you point out their lack of anti-Semitism when, again, the topic was anti-Zionism, i.e., activism and policies against the state of Israel and not Jews in particular.
The chutzpah you display in denying this despite the easily found documentation on internet and even the pictures is mind boggling.
Finally, as pointed out in >>24676
, there is the usual drill part of this, which is conspicuous although rarely brought in discussions about Breivik.
Not to count the testimonies of survivors who said that because of the planned event on the island, a facsimile of Palestinian LARPing resistance, they expected militarily-armed people to act as the Zionist police forces. Another convenient side of this story for sure.