>This "type of thinking" is a pure fallacy that weakens us
Agreed! For those who have your rigid, bulldog mentality, these ideas are clearly unnecessary and confusing. Simply continue your resistance against the enemy in whatever way you deem the most appropriate. Why does this hierarchical and differentiated system of ideas bother you? Do you believe that everyone should believe the same things, regardless of their nature? Did the SA stormtrooper behave the same way as an official of the Party and think the same way? This is my point here. You seek to put everyone generally aligned with 'our side', into one basket you call 'us', and anything which deviates from this rigid understanding, you condemn as "weakening the movement" or "jew loving", or even outright accuse of being a Jew themselves... This is not a good view of reality or this movement, and it is simply disheartening to see it.
Your hostility, while understandable, is unfounded and almost laughable, given what I have already said throughout these posts. I understand that even the smallest 'sniff' of sympathy towards Jews will unsettle you, but surely, you cannot mistake my, or Tsarion's outright contempt for Judaism, as 'jew loving'. Again, the only way to come to this conclusion is to cherry pick statements completely out of context, and proceed to get wildly triggered because it is "too nuanced". So yes, stay away from Tsarion, it clearly confuses you to the point of no return!
But we can revisit the sources of this confusion, but I suspect it is hopeless! And yes, you are quite simply wrong or confused, because you are fundamentally misunderstanding Tsarion's points, and your fixation on one or two quotes does the argument no service.
Well, it is either that, or perhaps my English is not as good as I believe!
I will attempt to reach the crux of your angst and hostility towards these ideas. I believe that it surrounds the notion that I, and Tsarion, are in any way sympathetic towards Jews. This is your fundamental point, yes?
We will return to the quote you so often invoke, "Why have so many contributed to Western culture in invaluable ways and in so many fields - music, art, comedy, literature, history, religion, law, healthcare, psychology, film-making, drama and media, etc?"
Tsarion makes this statement, to demonstrate that RIGID, BIOLOGICAL DETERMINISM, is simply not an adequate or realistic portrayal of reality. This is because genetic Jews have, without a shadow of a doubt, 'contributed' to Western institutions. They paint, they develop medicine, they compose music bla bla bla, they do all things that mainstream society deems as "worthy and normal contributions". Does this make them, or their horrific religion, "good", NO. This simply means that all Jews are not inherently "programed" to participate in the world wide conspiracy of destruction and decay, they are simply more inclined to do so because of their INHERENT TENDENCIES. This painfully obvious lack of biological determinism (that you fruitlessly deny), is why untold multitudes served in all aspects of the Third Reich.
Want to get triggered? How does it feel that a genetic Jew who served loyally in the Wehrmacht did more for "Aryan civilization", than you have ever done or likely will do?
This is the part where you now accuse me of being a Jew by the way, if you were at all confused!
Do these examples of "normal, harmless or good Jews" mean Judaism should be tolerated? No, it must be eradicated and thrown out, for reasons I have already explained, along with all its secular manifestations such as Marxism and indeed the current world order of banking technocrats. Judaism must be wiped from the Earth, and it has no place in the West. I have no doubt that those genetic Jews who served the Reich would have been properly distanced from the German State in the end, to prevent the latent nature of their very blood to manifest in the future.
Frankly, I don't mind if you, or people like you adopt a more rigid view of race, genetics and religion. I view the necessity and virtue for such simplistic beliefs for the majority of people. I don't know how many more times you want me to say the same thing. Do I have to bring up the SA stromtrooper analogy once again? Goodness!
I am inclined to simply say "be on your way and carry on", because I think your attitude is suitable for yourself and those like you, simply direct your energy towards the actual enemy!
>They are not "good", and only harmless as long as they're literally restrained in their freedoms. Any time one loses the leash, the same problems return, as they always have.
Yes, agreed, perhaps a bit edgy and misanthropic for my taste, but sure! What is the problem here?