/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, News, History


[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply Return
Säge
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.


04/08/21 New logo contest is now open for the upcoming site update! Submit your entry here.
08/28/20 Come and join our Matrix/IRC servers, the info can be found here.
02/09/20 /ausneets/ has been added!
11/23/19 Donations can now be made via PayPal, thank you for all of your support!
11/21/19 We have successfully migrated to LynxChan 2.3.0, to see all of the changes to 16chan, click here.


[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(127.54 KB 1024x1020 1568824842011.jpg)
Embrace the Revolutionary Dialectic Anonymous 10/07/2020 (Wed) 15:44:37 No. 35883
There is a simple dialectic by which a genuine Revolutionary must analyze events and actions; Does this action or event ultimately lead to the overthrow of the jewish oligarchy? If the answer is No, then that action or event was either irrelevant (a waste) or it was harmful (worse than nothing). If the answer is Yes, then that action or event is ultimately good. This is a very simple concept. Now let us examine a specific event which many people are deeply confused about. Brenton Tarrant said that when he chose his weapons, he specifically selected firearms which would evoke dread among anti-gun shitlibs in America. He wrote that he hoped to induce a mass gun confiscation in America which would precipitate a revolution. People who whine that Tarrant's actions will lead to gun confiscation are not revolutionary thinkers. They are just conservatives, seeking to preserve the current (((status quo))) above all other things. The proper way to analyze gun confiscation is; Will gun confiscation cause (insert country's people) to revolt against the (((illegal regime?))) If the answer is Yes, then gun confiscation is an ultimate good. Anything that causes the cowardly White population to wake up and fight is a good thing. If the answer is No, then the cravenness of White people is worse than we thought and White people did not deserve guns in the first place. Guns have just one purpose in this world. That purpose is shooting the enemies of White Liberation. Every second that a gun is not being utilized for this purpose is a wasted second. If a people refuse to revolt against the most evil regime ever to exist openly confiscating their firearms, then the people did not deserve to possess arms in the first place. They do not deserve free speech or press. They do not deserve to live in houses or eat food which is free from arsenic. They do not deserve to be free from police abuse and exploitation. They do not even deserve to live. This is the only proper way to analyze Tarrant and it is the only proper way to analyze events. Will X lead to White Revolution? Yes or No.
>>35883 Genuine posters already have. Don't get thrown off by trumpshills.
>>35885 That is good to hear.
Based. Opticucks are the worse. Love the drawing.
>>35883 based and fuckin' redpilled m8
After Tarrant's action the trucks of peace ceased to exist. I think this is very important.
(98.96 KB 1024x512 1601257365483.jpg)
>>35883 >faggy reframing of the debate around acceleration. how one makes such a cocksure leap from gun confiscation to overthrow of the jewish oligarghy is laughable. >>35891 >>35954 this thread is very gay. nothing against tarrant, i fall into the camp that he was not "some kind of israeli psyop." however this thread ultimately translates into a subtle D&C in that it divides people over "what must be done." many are in different circumstances, different countries, with different backgrounds which will lead them to different conclusions on what will or will not lead to white revolution. by asserting one must be in one camp or other so strongly, it merely serves to drive a wedge between (White) people that ultimately have the same goals.
>>35977 >how one makes such a cocksure leap from gun confiscation to overthrow of the jewish oligarghy is laughable. Will gun confiscation lead to resistance? Yes or no. Your strawman is false. If you didn't support Revolutionary goals to begin with, you were never a revolutionary. Merely a conservative.
(1.20 MB 600x338 ezgif-7-3ada3157a585.gif)
>>35982 Not on nearly the scale people here predict. It happened without a hitch in Aus and NZ. Most gun owners here, like there, are fudds who won't bat an eye at giving up their toys. The people that resist will be FEMA'd and denounced as terrorists by the media apparatus. In the end, this will only accomplish complete defenselessness in the face of increasing negro aggression.
>>35982 >doubles down on D&C accelerationists eternally btfo'd. imagine pushing for acceleration post-corona. no one on the right could have predicted the 'rona and no one could knew we would have a second round of blm chimpouts and ongoing antifa riots until they happened. all of the accleration we're seeing today came without a single physical "move" by the right. it was all the left, and the right merely continues to spread information and grow on the internet. we do not need to step on the gas at all, the "movement" continues to grow via a cultural shift towards more conservative values and lifestyle, and a white racial re-awakening. this is what the leftists truly fear and this is what we must continue working on. the rest follows. martyring oneself at this stage to push for a gun confiscation is exactly the opposite of what we need. millions of normie whites are gaining racial consciousness as we speak. we need more time for this consciousness to grow and ignite before significant conflict pops off so these whites are not atomized and ignorant of what is happening. many are not as informed as we are. fuck you, fuck your gay ideas, and fuck your thread. gun confiscation continues to be what the elites want. prove to us you aren't an agent of (((them))). you can't and you won't, because your linguistic style and dialectic have grown repetitive and obvious.
(178.31 KB 1600x1042 A6FBIWFP6VAWTEZ4LPRRPV7WV4.jpg)
>>36018 >kikes and leftists use accelerationist strategies to reach their goals, they always achieve them and now rule us *crickets* >whites propose to use accelerationist strategies to achieve their own goals REEEEEEEEEEEE DON'T DO IT, IT'S BAD, IT WON'T WORK, DON'T ROCK THE BOAT, TRUST THE PLAN, WE'RE GOING TO WIN ANY DAY NOW!!!
>>36023 coming from kikes it isn't acceleration, it is just them moving forward with their plan. >REEEEEEEEEEEE DON'T DO IT, IT'S BAD, IT WON'T WORK, DON'T ROCK THE BOAT yeah this isn't an glaring usurpation of what is now outmoded chan culture. step behind, "shlomo."
(45.17 KB 759x394 15821754683.png)
>>36048 >coming from kikes it isn't acceleration, it is just them moving forward with their plan. Oy vey goyim, only kikes are allowed to pursue their plans as they see fit. You must do nothing, instead.
(792.33 KB 1468x7317 lemmings.png)
>>36010 >most gun owners here, are fudds who won't bat an eye at giving up their toys. Old fuds who will meekly obey any order did not deserve to be armed in the first place. > In the end, this will only accomplish complete defenselessness in the face of increasing negro aggression. If they would not fight back against tyranny, then they would not fight back against niggers. And even if they did, they'd just be arrested for hate crimes and then meekly go to jail to be raped to death. Which is exactly what they deserve. >>36018 You do not even know what D&C is, you dumb kike. D&C is attempting to split White people along religious, ideological, or ethnic lines. I am saying "WE need to overthrow the regime." I don't give a shit if you are a Christian or an agnostic. I don't even care if you are a Muslim. All of that is irrelevant next to the actual (((problem.))) >the "movement" continues to grow via a cultural shift towards more conservative values and lifestyle Conservatism is death. Conservatives have never once triumphed over any culture conflict. Conservatives are the people who support ZOG at all costs because ZOG is the "legitimate government" Conservatism is the exact, polar opposite of White re-awakening. Conservatives want everything to remain (((exactly as it is))) so they can continue grilling and voting Republican and sucking off the regime. And you bring up the claim or fact that we are growing on the internet. But you want us to ignore the fact that becoming a popular meme is not the end goal. The end goal is to do something which leads to the removal of jews from positions of power. That requires real world actions. That requires organization and motivation. You internet people only want to become popular for your shitty mass movement shit. But mass movements are not possible without media control. And I also do not see much evidence that we are growing faster than a snail's pace. In any case, you argue disingenuously and this alone outs you as an outsider. You don't even know what D&C is. Your position is based on lies. Were it not, you wouldn't have been forced to lie and argue dishonestly.
>>36049 >strawman >>36058 hahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha

Delete
Report


no cookies?