/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, News, History


[Hide]
Posting Mode: Reply Return
Säge
Name
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files
E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Max files: 5
  • Max file size: 50.00 MB
  • Read the global rules before you post, as well as the board rules found in the sticky.


04/08/21 New logo contest is now open for the upcoming site update! Submit your entry here.
08/28/20 Come and join our Matrix/IRC servers, the info can be found here.
02/09/20 /ausneets/ has been added!
11/23/19 Donations can now be made via PayPal, thank you for all of your support!
11/21/19 We have successfully migrated to LynxChan 2.3.0, to see all of the changes to 16chan, click here.


[Index] [Catalog] [Archive] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(115.36 KB 1281x641 flag of rhodesia.png)
(664.65 KB 497x524 SelousScoutRestsHisFeet.png)
No Rhodesia thread? Let's fix that. :) Anonymous 12/28/2020 (Mon) 02:06:11 No. 38197
I hope at least one fun thread is ok here. I'll start off. Here is the flag of the Republic of Rhodesia and two pic of the SAS and Selous Scouts respectively in order. Because there is so much room and 16chan is gearing up to be better than 8chan, let's look into these groups with a little detail. ____ SAS: The SAS were the Rhodesians answer to the RLI's commando operations. Whereas the RLI was the go-to force for military operations within the bush in the country's frontier, it was also helpful just past the country's borders. The SAS on the other hand, was to be deployed several kilometres past Rhodesia's border deep into enemy territory. Countries such as Zambia, Mozambique and in some isolated cases, Botswana. It should be noted that Botswana claimed that insurgents, mainly if not entirely, from ZIPRA were only able to operate in the country due to incompetence on the government's fault, however, a platoon of British SAS (at the request of Joshua Nkomo) were caught operating radio relays and other radio nodes within the country (It was also rumoured at the time that Angola was planning, along with Zambia and Mozambique, a full-scale invasion of Rhodesia, but this never came to fruition as Ian Smith threw in the towel). Nonetheless, The SAS' primary function was not the traditional guerilla-style of shoot and scoot, rather, targets were selected carefully and overwhelming firepower was employed as well as strategic economic targets such as the oil refinery in Beira. The SAS was also tasked with using their specially-made vehicles, such as "Hotlips" and the "Crocodile" heavily armed APCs, to inflict massive damage on armoured enemy convoys which acted as a stop gap. The SAS troopie was armed and equipped with the typical FAL, but unlike the RLI's 4-man stick with 3 FALs to 1 Mag, the SAS stick was typically armed with 2 FAL and 2 RPDs, but sometimes the stick bold enough to equip 1 FAL and 3 RPD gunners. Oftentimes, the SAS found themselves short on FAL ammo, so a stick, or several, would operate with 2 AKMs and 2 RPDs. A further variation existed with sticks incorporating RPG rocketers should a column of heavy vehicles require it as well as their use of landmines for such harassment operations. ____ Selous Scouts: A secretive group formed in 1973 originally from hyperactive and ambitious members of the BSAP's Special Branch, The Selous Scouts also recruited from the RLI and SAS much to both of the latter's chagrin; though being recruited from either branch to the Scouts was not a guarantee that one had what it took to become a Scout. Nonetheless, the Selous Scouts' primary objective was smaller scale, and primarily focused on military intelligence gathering notably from ZANLA insurgents (ZIPRA was more conventional and was a tougher nut to crack due to being better trained than ZANLA). Nonetheless, the Selous Scouts' excellent gathering of intel was the reason that the fireforce operations were so successful, also in part due to the mentality of the Scouts acting and thinking like the insurgents themselves. Besides this passive information gathering, the Scouts also proved their worth in kidnapping individual insurgent leaders, as well as sniffing them out when they were in-country. Despite all of this, the Scouts also proved themselves to be excellent tactical operators such as in the case of Operation Eland, aka the Nyadzonya raid, whereby 84 Scouts occupying 4 armoured cars and 7 trucks, killed over 1,000 insurgents and are estimated to have injured more than double that amount. ___ Thank you for taking the time to read this. Please feel free to share anything related.
(12.82 MB 854x480 PBdO7qpZW3DI.mp4)
(5.15 MB 854x480 esHh5lPHxKB3.mp4)
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/iansmith/ Has a ton of saved videos that were shoah'd from jewtube, including a lot of documentaries and Ian Smith pieces
(321.17 KB 798x626 Rhodesia.jpg)
>>38197 So you want a thread about a bunch of Jews? Rhodes was literally a fucking Jew, and these cunts were useless Jewish fags. But I get it, the English/Anglo-Judaic world wants to pretend they're not inbred Jews so praise Rhodesia for never being the strongest, richest, or most developed country in Africa.
>>38212 wignat detected. What's hilarious is that you don't mention the Rhodesians had their own state bank, completely non-reliant on the international banking system. In terms of not being the strongest nor richest, those are both absurd considering that strength alone in numbers and tech is inconsequential regarding military matters (just ask the Americans who are losing Afghanistan and just lost Iraq), whereby cunning is much preferred esp. such daring operations as Eland and Dingo. Regardless, what I find most bizarre is your belief that being rich has anything to do with a country's worth (nevermind that the average person in Rhodesia earned more money per month than her neighbours, save South Africa), which makes me think, that you yourself are in fact, jewish.
Rhodesia was based. Too bad it didnt last, I guess they just didnt have enough white people.
(16.49 MB 4927x3456 realniggahours.png)
(1.07 MB 1181x1010 choppas.png)
(2.69 MB 1384x880 RSF Elands.png)
(1.72 MB 886x886 crazy man.png)
(21.91 MB 3271x4275 Dennis Croukamp in RLI uniform.png)
>>38217 Ironically, I'd argue that South Africa would have had a better shot at surviving than Rhodesia, simply because RSA had so many different nations of blacks (that hated eachother mind you) as opposed to Rhodesia, which had only 2 major Nations of black people (nevermind the several subdivisions of tribes and clans). I fully agree that if Rhodesia had even a half-million people, the story could have been different. I guess that means that birth rates really do matter. Further, I am of the opinion that ever white person should have left after the war to continue survival in South Africa or South-West Africa.
>>38213 What's hilarious is that you didn't mention is that Rhodesians loved living with niggers and even allowed them in their parliament. What's hilarious that you don't mention is that Rhodesia only had Britain and African countries sanctioning them, while South Africa was sanctioned by every single country on the planet save Switzerland and Israel, not to mention South Africa had socialist policies that allowed poorer whites to live decent lives, and thus the "higher salary is good hur dur" argument is the same argument a stupid Americunt would make, because they were essentially greedy fucking Jews. What's hilarious that you don't mention, is that white Rhodesians worshipped Afrikaner Nationalism, which many former Rhodesians attest to when answering about their past. This is why Rhodesians generally also spoke Afrikaans, and a lot of their military operations were named in Afrikaans. Not to mention during their skirmish with people armed with only rifles and mortars, South Africans were allowed to join them in their war without leaving the SADF. South Africa had the most powerful military in Africa by far, and statistically the most effective at the time. If you don't believe me learn from your beloved Jan Lamprecht, or you know, read a fucking book. When South Africa had war they were fighting against an actual military, Cubans with tanks and planes along with hordes of nigger militias. What's hilarious that you don't mention, is that Cecil Rhodes was a filthy Jew nigger whom along with Alfred Beit, the Randlord Jew, instigated the second Boer war in which the Boers fought nobly, outnumbered between 9 - 11 to 1, 9 is bias British sources, and only lost due to the fact that they didn't execute prisoners and released them after three days because they couldn't feed them. Contrast that with British treatment of civilians, Rhodesians stem from the stock of cowards who could not beat real men, so had to slaughter white civilians for their Masonic master Rhodes, and their Jewish overlord Beit. Keep believing in your ridiculous idea of what Rhodesia was, when in reality they were begging South Africa for their old equipment, old Jets, tanks, and armored vehicles, because "muh based Anglo nation" couldn't afford it from anyone else.
>>38221 This is correct. The AWB had strategic alliances with black tribes at the time, the IFP is a popular example, but there were multiple, and they were trying to work with these tribes for independence for each of them after it became apparent that the Afrikaner Broederbond had been infiltrated by Jews like Pik Botha and Meyer who were subverting it and leading it to destruction. The policy of Apartheid was never agreed upon by the populace, and was fundamentally contradictory to what the original Boer nations wanted, because if they had wanted to have a nigger workforce, they could've done that after destroying the Zulus so badly that they slaughtered their own king after Blood river, but they did not, they only wanted the land from the treaty. The decision was made by a bunch of rich Broederbonders who were out of touch with what the Boer people wanted, and turned their backs on those principles. They and the British created that system.
>>38243 The British and their jewish masters fucked up South africa, Rhodesia and South West Africa all over Diamonds, gold and multicultrualism. The eternal bonglander.
>38242 >38245 These two posts were typed by jewish fingers. >>38243 There is truth to this. It wasn't just the AWB, it was the National Party and the Conservative Party which maintained ties with the individual blacks nations and subsequent tribes within the country. You're also correct regarding the Apartheid political strategy. In one sense, it didn't do enough, and in another, it was horrible optics. Firsly, if you look at the layout of the bantustans, with them all looking cobbled together and without purpose, belies the fact that even though the various tribes settled where they were, it still looked to the UN and the international community to be a prison scape, though this is not accurate. The remedy this, the government should have at the very least, had the pieces of land connected to eachother, while granting more land. The other thing is that Apartheid was not implemented by the Afrikaners, but rather by the British government in the 1910's one of such laws called the homelands act (or something to that accord).
My "Jewish" fingers typed one of the replies you claimed were typed by such, and the one you agreed with, make up your mind. You are correct it was implemented by the British and their lackeys, Jan Smuts and Louis Botha, two generals born in British territory, and Hertzog, an early infiltrator Jew into Boer ranks who sided with, wait for it, Britainistan. And no, I don't have Jew fingers, I'm a white South African, of Dutch, German, and Huguenot descent, I'm less Jewish than any Anglo who has been interbreeding with Semites for thousands of years due to Phoenician mines and marrying with Hyksos (proto-Jewish) princesses among the Picts. You're the Jew, isn't that why you created Israel and rejected peace with the Germans?
(1.52 MB 1920x1080 Screenshot (1998).png)
(1.39 MB 1920x1080 Screenshot (1999).png)
(1.29 MB 1920x1080 Screenshot (2000).png)
>>38449 Welcome back angry Druid B(r)oer. Look, we are sorry our grandfathers and great grandfathers fought on the wrong side. But it's been a hundred and twenty fucking years. Think it may be time to bury the hatchet. Clearly many of our boomer parents were brainwashed by cold war propaganda and stands to reason it was not much different a century ago. Did jews have a hand in Rhodesia? Probably (not well read up on it but will take your word), seeing as there isn't many wars they didn't have their grubby little hands in. That doesn't entirely dismiss the the men who fought in those wars, as they had little choice in the matter. Whether they like it or not, there was going to be a war, and their homes and families were going to be at risk. In that way their fight was just and is understandable why their sons and grandsons here may want to honor their bravery and sacrifice.
(2.89 MB 1500x1000 ClipboardImage.png)
>>38452 Winter Watch, however, is more interested in the mechanism by which Rhodes and his closer associates operated. We would characterize it as the Imperial Factor, Jewish finance (Rothschilds in particular) and an in-group cadre of well-connected homosexual pederasts. Lord Rosebery We have mentioned Archibald Primrose aka Lord Rosebery as an original Rhodes trustee. Rosebery’s claim to fame was his marriage to Hannah de Rothschild, the only child and sole heir of Jewish banker Mayer Amschel de Rothschild and the wealthiest British heiress of her day. It was also speculated that Rosebery was bisexual. Besides becoming immensely wealthy via his wife’s estate, he served as prime minister from March 1894 to June, 1895. He supported the Boer War, was part of the WWI War Party and brought along many nonconformists alike. Next is Lord Viscount Alfred Milner who was the key imperial official of poor diplomacy and helped cause the Second Boer War of 1899 to 1902. Historian Bill Nasson says: “As Britain’s supercilious and arrogant South African High Commissioner, his unleashing of war upon the independent Boer republics in 1899 and ham‐fisted efforts to anglicize conquered Boer society after the end of hostilities in 1902 earned him the undiminished enmity of nationalist Afrikaners throughout the rest of the twentieth century.” Milner was also a chief author of the “Balfour Declaration of 1917” that promised Palestine to the Zionists as a quid pro quo for Jewish help in dragging the US into WWI. The scheme was issued in the name of Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour. Lord Milner was a homosexual, and likely a pederast as well. Lord Balfour was bisexual, an occultist (devotee of the paranormal) and it is alleged a sado-masochist. Viscount Milner Milner had an unfavorable view of Afrikaners and, as a matter of philosophy, saw the British as “a superior race.” Lord Milner would call himself a “British race patriot” with grand dreams of a global Imperial parliament headquartered in London. “I am an Imperialist and not a Little Englander because I am a British Race Patriot,” he stated. “The British State must follow the race, must comprehend it, wherever it settles in appreciable numbers as an independent community. If the swarms constantly being thrown off by the parent hive are lost to the State, the State is irreparably weakened. We cannot afford to part with so much of our best blood.” The secret society was renamed by Alfred Milner to the Round Table. Milner’s Kindergarten was a group of mustachioed homosexuals that housed a cartel of the most powerful and wealthy people on the planet. Ronald Brown in his book “Secret Society” explains: “Immediately after the Great War, Milner, Philip Kerr and Lionel Curtis in particular began to set up a global hegemony. It exerted influence through institutions and a hierarchy of thinkers. These institutions were all housed in grand buildings, which became known as Think Tanks.” Cecil Rhodes (left) and his running buddy, Jewish financier Alfred Beit Historian Thomas Pakenham noted the “secret allies” of Rhodes and Milner, the British High Commissioner for South Africa, were the “London ‘gold-bugs’ — especially the financiers of the largest of all the Rand mining houses, (((Wernher-Beit))).” Pakenham continued: “Alfred Beit was the giant — a giant who bestrode the world’s gold market like a gnome. He was short, plump and bald, with large, pale, luminous eyes and a nervous way of tugging at his grey moustache.” Beit and (((Lionel Phillips))) together controlled H. Eckstein & Co., the largest South African mining syndicate. Of the six largest mining companies, four were controlled by Jews. Jameson Rhodes later maintained a significant lover relationship with Scotsman Sir Leander Starr Jameson, who was a baronet known as “Dr. Jim” and British administrator of the lands constituting present-day Zimbabwe. He ended up loyally nursing Rhodes during his final illness. Jameson was a trustee of his estate and residuary beneficiary of his will, which allowed him to continue living in Rhodes’ mansion after his death."
Although Jameson died in England in 1917, after the conclusion if WW I his body was transferred to a mountaintop grave in 1920 beside that of Rhodes in Rhodesia (present-day Zimbabwe). Tellingly, Cecil Square is today one of the main gay cruising areas of Harare, the capital city of Zimbabwe. On December 29, 1895, a band of 500 British adventurers led by Rhodes’ lover Jameson forcibly tried to seize control of the Boer republics in an “unofficial” armed takeover. Rhodes, who was then also prime minister of the British-ruled Cape Colony, organized the venture, which Alfred Beit financed to the tune of 200,000 pounds. Phillips also joined the conspiracy. According to their plan, the raiders would dash from neighboring British territory into Johannesburg to “defend” the British “outlanders.” By secret prior arrangement, the outlanders would simultaneously seize control of the city in the name of the “oppressed” aliens and proclaim themselves the new government of Transvaal. “Johannesburg is ready,” Rhodes confided to Beit in a letter about the plan written four months before the raid. “[This is] the big idea which makes England dominant in Africa, in fact gives England the African continent.” After 21 men lost their lives in the takeover attempt, Jameson and his fellow raiders were captured and put on trial. In Johannesburg, Transvaal authorities arrested Phillips for his part in organizing the raid. They found incriminating secret correspondence between him and co-conspirators Beit and Rhodes, which encouraged Phillips to confess his guilt. Transvaal court leniently sentenced Jameson to 15 months imprisonment. Phillips was sentenced to death, but this was quickly commuted to a fine of 25,000 pounds. Later, after returning to Britain, the financier was knighted for his services to the Empire, and during the First World War was given a high and lucritive war profiteering post in the Ministry of Munitions. Over the years, Rhodes accumulated a shifting entourage of fit young men known as “Rhodes’ lambs.” They were almost always blond-haired, blue-eyed, athletic types. Within the space of a few years, he would be mingling with a powerful coterie of homosexual, lesbian and bisexual men and women, all of whom would become members of, or be politically associated with, his secret society. Another key operative of the British supremacist homosexual power structure was the “self-confessed pederast” Reginald Baliol Brett (aka Lord Esher)." How does it feel to realize your beloved Rhodesia was founded by a bunch of pedophiles, faggots, and Jews? We're not brothers, and we never will be. Your empire was always a Jewish empire, and what the second war cost us was more than pride, it was an entire history and destiny of my people. Your brave soldiers losing 11 to 1 until the slaughtered white civilians for Jewish faggots. What kind of men fight for faggots? Lastly, it isn't just that war isn't it? It's throughout your entire history, because your ilk have been interbreeding with Jews for thousands of years. So for all your attempts to convince me we should "pull together", there is no together between Germanic peoples and British, the British are an inherently Semitic people, who have long since cut ties with Germanic peoples, and therefore are nothing but our enemies. Your commonwealth is about to become Chinese, Scotland will leave your union followed by Northern Ireland. You will be more vulnerable in the next few decades than you have been for a very long time.
(1.07 MB 1181x1010 choppas.png)
(1.58 MB 646x960 Larry Jenkins - BSAP SIS.png)
(314.42 KB 487x720 Ian Smith gun.png)
(1.69 MB 935x943 vehicle gunner.png)
>>38452 Good luck trying to argue with that idiot. He's the type of person who is trying to argue that since Rhodesia (but strangely leaving out South Africa) was named after a faggot who was in close ties with a jewish financier and the Rothschilds bank, that somehow, the Rep. Rhodesia's war against worldwide communism and further British meddling, was somehow irrelevant in of itself. Most of the nonsense he has spewed is a pathetic division attack trying to separate the Afrikaners and the English Rhodesians/South Africans. I am here to say it won't work. Here's a reply I made to both of his ashkenazic/schizophrenic posting. >>38553 >>38555 literally all of this information is irrelevant considering that Ian Smith insulted the crown by declaring independence and then allied himself with the Afrikaner-led South Africa. Further, both countries, Rep. Rhodesia and RSA, had their own national banks which were in no way tied to the IMF or Worldbank. For you to incite this divisive nonsense while quoting irrelevant texts in some way to try and change the course of the discussion or moods and opinions of both countries is not working.
>>38212 this is the truth. if its connected to britain, functioning outside of britain, and involves territory, its judaic by default.
>>38565 So South Africa, which was invented by the English and managed by us, was named after a Jew? Also, the Boer Republics were the only true Boer nations not perverted with British idiocy, tell me which one was founded by or named after Jews? The divisiveness comes from the fact that you destroyed my people in your Judaic greed, ancestral grudges are a natural part of a true European's life, so is retribution against the greedy Jewish British empire. Maybe if you hadn't killed so many of our civilians and we'd had more than double the population we did now, and weren't forced into a system which you then started to sanction as soon as we didn't want to be under your heel, then we could've ignored you. But that isn't what happened. You are an enemy of all Boer, all German, all Scots, and all Irish people. You are on your own.
>>38566 Indeed, the British like to pretend as if it was their accomplishment, in reality it was the Jews, who only needed their name to operate unhindered. The East India company merely jumped from The Netherlands to England because the agrarian model of wealth had become more viable. All their propaganda about how great their nation was, was based on Jewish enterprise, perfect goylum.
>>38603 Cecil Rhodes wasn't jewish. I still don't see what you're point is after what I said about Rhodesia and South Africa being independent in their banking system.
>>38612 What else do you call a faggot pedophile who has the features of a Jew and was tied to both Beit and Rothchild? You're in denial, read that post again. You've been worshipping a child-fucking Jew. Typical Brithish B'Nai nigger.
(3.94 MB 4834x3176 IMG_0278.JPG)
>>38612 >Cecil Rhodes wasn't jewish all (((calvinists))) are jewish. Calvins real name was Cohen.
>>38615 Yes, quote us some funny propaganda lines from an Englishman to justify the Jewish agenda in taking over the Transvaal and violating the Sandriver convention. We were so hostile to the indigenous niggers, which you seem to love via your quote, that after utterly crushing the Zulu at bloodriver so badly they even killed their own king for us, all we took was the land we bought from them. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/565425.Diamonds_Gold_and_War http://www.boerwararchive.com/ https://www.amazon.com/Three-years-war-Christiaan-Rudolf/dp/B00085KOFI Many other sources, but obviously, since you're a low IQ individual, you opted for the most bias British-kike propaganda that you could find. The same propaganda that was used against the Germans when your beloved Churchill was in debt to them. As for the Calvinist spew, it is common knowledge that Calvinists thought that white people were the real Israelites and thus considered themselves the chosen people, it's this same ideology that birthed Christian identity, both garbage. However, since all Europeans were Christian at the time, that doesn't change the fact that all Europeans were thus unfortunately spiritual Jews, regardless of denomination. Your argument is thus hypocritical. J A Hobson’s ‘The War in South Africa’, 1900, exposed the fake atrocity propaganda and disinformation against the Boers to demonize them in the eyes of the British public. He revealed the true source of this incitement to war – the powerful Zionist lobby in South Africa which he termed ‘the Jew-Imperialists’. The British government expected a quick defeat of the tiny Farmer-Boer population within a few months. However, as Goodson states: A tiny force of never more than 6,000 active Boers was able to frustrate and tie down 448,725 troops of the world’s largest empire.” Cecil Rhodes was a kike, at best a crypto-Jew, and as previously proven in my above previous quotes from winterwatch, which is anti-Zionist, he was a staunch Zionist, pedophile, homosexual, and was in bed with Jews like Beit and Rothchild, as well as the London bankers.
(365.43 KB 612x345 ClipboardImage.png)
(1.02 MB 1024x698 ClipboardImage.png)
(1.12 MB 1600x1200 ClipboardImage.png)
>>38615 Now to continue, in your attempt to prove me wrong, which didn't refute that Rhodes was a Zionist kike faggot and pedophile, you exposed your lack of aptitude regarding reading and comprehension. Did you read what you posted? You literally posted British propaganda sympathetic to niggers... I guess we all know you're a nigger lover, and just another kike in denial that you're a kike in the first place. Next time you want to prove a point, don't expose yourself as an imbecile that cannot read what he's posting. This is what you are, nothing but lying, scheming Jewish goylem, who have throughout your history done nothing but enforce their will on Aryan peoples. Nothing you say, and no matter how much you deny it, can change that you English are Semites.
(17.41 KB 500x426 testing. 1.2.3.jpg)
>>38616 >We were so hostile to the indigenous niggers, which you seem to love via your quote, that after utterly crushing the Zulu at bloodriver so badly they even killed their own king for us, all we took was the land we bought from them. thats what you took from that highlighted quote? its the exact MO of the kikes. nice to see your nose poking out >>38616 >Cecil Rhodes was a kike, at best a crypto-Jew, and as previously proven in my above previous quotes from winterwatch, which is anti-Zionist, he was a staunch Zionist, pedophile, homosexual, and was in bed with Jews like Beit and Rothchild, as well as the London bankers. where did i once dispute any of that? >>38618 >And also, nobody spoke Flemish in South Africa, Flemish is an unrelated dialect, my ancestors spoke Hollandic, which is an entirely different Dialect. yes, your ancestors were the entire population...got it. you engage like a kike whilst attacking them. peculiar
>>38615 And also, nobody spoke Flemish in South Africa, Flemish is an unrelated dialect, my ancestors spoke Hollandic, which is an entirely different Dialect. "Afrikaans (UK: /ˌæfrɪˈkɑːns/, US: /ˌɑːf-/)[5][6] is a West Germanic language spoken in South Africa, Namibia and, to a lesser extent, Botswana, Zambia and Zimbabwe. It evolved from the Dutch vernacular[7][8] of Holland (Hollandic dialect)[9][10] spoken by the Dutch settlers in South Africa, where it gradually began to develop distinguishing characteristics in the course of the 18th century.[11] Hence, it is a daughter language of Dutch." So your source is not only bullshit propaganda, whoever wrote it wasn't even educated enough to correctly state facts regarding the book's antagonists.
>>38620 >Now to continue, in your attempt to prove me wrong, which didn't refute that Rhodes was a Zionist kike faggot and pedophile, you exposed your lack of aptitude regarding reading and comprehension. where did i deny once they were kikes and zionists? never. i showed you precisely that they were (((calvinists))) and if you read the book it connects all the figures of the periods as kikes and zionists, with the occasional shabbos goy. reading comprehension? ZERO
>>38618 >>38622 >same post twice bot script?
>>38621 You literally quoted a book trying to justify genocide against whites because "The Boer people were hostile towards indigenous peoples." That's pro-nigger propaganda, you foolish little kike. The second post above yours with the shitty pro-nigger, pro-kike propaganda book, you said Rhodes was not Jewish. If that wasn't you, doesn't change that you were promoting Jewish propaganda to justify Jewish greed, all in the name of helping some poor blacks, right? The author literally said they spoke Flemish, Boer people never spoke Flemish. They spoke Hollandic, get some better propaganda for your owner next time, nigger.
>>38624 Typed reply twice because it wouldn't show, had to refresh page. Not going to get out of this one nigger-lover.
(684.18 KB 1242x930 peacekeeper duties.jpg)
>>38626 no i didnt. i posted this >>38615 in response to this posters reply >>38612 you are seething at me for no reason like a dumb nigger. heres my posts >>38566 >>38615 >>38621 >>38623 >>38624 now go subvert another information exchange
(82.30 KB 1200x675 1578003935569.jpg)
>>38626 >The second post above yours with the shitty pro-nigger, pro-kike propaganda book, you said Rhodes was not Jewish things that didnt happen. the book is good. you think its shit, because you think i am a different poster. instead of looking at the info i providede, you make wild assumption on a book you never read, because you think im someone else. let me guess, you are (((american)))...
>>38629 Now it makes sense, because you're apparently autistic too, how does this: >>38615 relate to this? >>38612 You made a post about Anglo-Zionist propaganda to refute his claim that Rhodes was not a kike? Doesn't make any fucking sense.
(64.00 KB 715x780 1583175908372.png)
>>38631 >how does this: >>38615 relate to this? >>38612 as you are quite clearly retarded, il explain, slowly in simple english >the poster i responded to claimed rhodes wasnt jewish >i know thats bullshit because Calvinism (Cohenism) is fucking jewish subversion of the faith >the book, with the very simple qoute which states they were (((calvinists))) is supporting evidence its a kike operation. >i bought that book in hope it would highlight them being (((calvinists))) (which means they are kikes, if you dont know what ((( ))) is) >you are focusing on a a page worth of info, when the only thing to look at is the fucking information within the red box around it you are insufferable. quite clearly, nigger tier IQ. you think the book is anglo zionist propaganda, but that is because you have not read it. every single book is fucking propaganda. being propaganda to a cause does not mean it doesnt contain factual information. its in teh regards that it is presented and what its serving purpose determines it as propaganda. you are painfully stupid, and dont have the intelligence to accept you are completely wrong. have another (you)
>>38630 So it's not propaganda? It's not propaganda yet is seeking to justify the second war by claiming "boohoo they treated the niggers badly", in an attempt to justify an invasion which was entirely predicated upon discovering minerals in the Transvaal? You can look up everything I claim, because I did study this history unlike you. Another claim made, is that we practiced slavery, which is false, unfortunately for you the constitutions are in Afrikaans which you cannot read, but here's a guy speaking about it in English: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/77yk0t/did_the_boer_republics_practice_slavery_after_it/ There was no government sanctioned slavery, it was frowned upon, this and ill-treatment of niggers was uncovered to be propaganda used by Zionists to justify the invasion back in Britain. Such a good book that can't correctly state the correct dialect used by my people, it's a shitty book, might as well read Doyle with all his fiction.
>>38634 before rage typing like the pathetic petulant teenager that you are, read the responses, you dumb shit
>>38634 >hes actually posting reddit links to support his arguments have an upvote, cunt
>>38633 Except your argument isn't as clear as you assumed, because the religion practiced by my people was Calvinist, the Huguenots were the largest religious influence since they were the first to migrate in large numbers, and they were Calvinist. Thus by reading that propaganda, which it is, it is easy to assume you were referring to Boer people. Next time be more clear in your argument.
>>38636 Not my fault you can't read Afrikaans, cunt, it's all in the interest of dumbing it down for you so that it is easily digestible.
>>38637 >Except your argument isn't as clear as you assumed you mean the only red box, highlighting text which very clearly states they are calvinists, isnr clear, when responding to someone whos denying they were a bunch of kikes and shabbos goys? ok retard. you are crying about propaganda, and within the same rage fit posting reddit threads discussing the topic as supporting evidence. a book is worth 1000 reddit threads. reddit is a heavily censored hell hole which is a propaganda outlet foremost, and information exchange last. your basis for your argument and rejection of the points raised is hilariously stupid. i wont bother wasting more time posting pages form the book covering supporting arguments. information is lost on you.
>>38637 >because the religion practiced by my people was Calvinist your people are kikes. we know
>>38640 >>38641 Okay then little Jew, let's go with that. Your argument is that Boer people are kikes, my argument is that English are kikes and that the second war and the foundation of Rhodesia, were both instances initiated by homosexual Jewish pedophiles, which I, unlike you, provided proof for. I already explained that Calvinism was a denomination which believed that its adherents, Europeans, were the real Israelites, and that this is what Christian identity is based on. I already also expressed that Calvinism, along with all denominations are spiritual Jewery, therefore implying that condemning a particular denomination is ignorant, and by that logic all Europeans who were Christians, thus spiritual Jews, are then Jews according to your ridiculous logic.
>>38642 >call others jews after being outed as one classy. as i clearly stated, >the british operations in their territories were jews as i posted here >>38566 and yes, calvinists real names are cohenists, as calvins real name was cohen, and you said your family were calvinists here >>38622 , so yeah, you are jews too. could you quickly speedrun an intelligence test please and post me a screencap of the results. you have 5 mins starting from 1 min after this post instead ofadmitting you were wrong, like a typical kike you still continue with your line of attack which has been voided. give up, handrubber
>>38644 "Why could I not have been born a hundred years ago, I used to ask myself, somewhere about the time of the Wars of Liberation, when a man was still of some value even though he had no ‘business?’ Thus I used to think it an ill-deserved stroke of bad luck that I had arrived too late on this terrestrial globe and I felt chagrined at the idea that my life would have to run its course along peaceful and orderly lines. 177 As a boy I was anything but a pacifist and all attempts to make me so turned out futile. Then the Boer War came, like a flash of lightning on the far horizon. Day after day, I used to gaze intently at the newspapers and I almost ‘devoured’ the telegrams and communiques, overjoyed to think that I could witness that heroic struggle, even though from so great a distance." Your opinion is that we are kikes, Hitler's opinion was that we were heroes, not only do you contradict Hitler, but you also post nigger-loving and Zionist propaganda. That quote is from the Stalag edition, filthy kike. With regards to the claim that all protestants of the Calvinist denomination were Jewish: Although much of Calvin's work was in Geneva, his publications spread his ideas of a correctly Reformed church to many parts of Europe. In Switzerland, some cantons are still Reformed, and some are Catholic. Calvinism became the theological system of the majority in Scotland (see John Knox), the Netherlands (see William Ames, T. J. Frelinghuysen and Wilhelmus à Brakel), some communities in Flanders, and parts of Germany (especially these adjacent to the Netherlands) in the Palatinate, Kassel and Lippe with the likes of Olevianus and his colleague Zacharias Ursinus. In Hungary and the then-independent Transylvania, Calvinism was a significant religion. Therefore you are condemning Germans, Dutch, Flemish, Scots, and Hungarians to the title of Jews, all because you're ignorant enough to think one Christian denomination is better than the other. What a stupid kike.
>>38645 nice pasta, addresses nothing or refutes a single thing. no one cares what hitlers opinions were. thats got nothing to do with the matter at hand. you have already long lost this argument. the only salvation is that this board is anonymous so no one will point and laugh at you socially. >>38645 >With regards to the claim that all protestants of the Calvinist denomination were Jewish: Although much of Calvin's work was in Geneva, his publications spread his ideas of a correctly Reformed church to many parts of Europe. In Switzerland, some cantons are still Reformed, and some are Catholic. Calvinism became the theological system of the majority in Scotland (see John Knox), the Netherlands (see William Ames, T. J. Frelinghuysen and Wilhelmus à Brakel), some communities in Flanders, and parts of Germany (especially these adjacent to the Netherlands) in the Palatinate, Kassel and Lippe with the likes of Olevianus and his colleague Zacharias Ursinus. In Hungary and the then-independent Transylvania, Calvinism was a significant religion. Therefore you are condemning Germans, Dutch, Flemish, Scots, and Hungarians to the title of Jews, all because you're ignorant enough to think one Christian denomination is better than the other. What a stupid kike. you think the international cabal is rooted in one nation? not an amalgamation of different nations? hahahahahahaha please just kys
>>38645 you need a new script. back to the discord, faggot
>>38647 I'll take your backpaddling all day, peasant.
>>38646 I'm well aware that they were in all countries, and were involved in all denominations, and that is the very reason I did not concur with your claim that Calvinists were kikes, they were simply one spiritual Jew religion, among the many that were present in Europe. It is however undeniable that there has been no people in Europe, or off the coast of it to be precise, that has been as monumental in spreading Jewish dominance in the world as the British. The other two instances that come close are the Jewish roles in the Polish-Lithuanian realms, and the East and West India Companies in the Netherlands, which was between 30% and 50% owned by Jews who were chased out of Spain and allowed in because the Dutch needed the money to resist Spanish conquest, these same Jews packed up and left for England to form their companies over there. None as influential as the British, because let's not forget as previously stated, that the British were already interbred with Jews due to ancient Phoenician mines in England and Picts marrying with proto-kikes from Egypt. The British encompassed more territory, and were entirely controlled by the Jews in time, which is why you had a Jewish Prime Minister named Disraeli. So I'm well aware that they've been everywhere, the fact remains they didn't have the same level of influence or success everywhere, and never to the extent that they had in Britain.
>>38648 >I'll take your backpaddling all day whos backpeddling. i have consistently stood by my original comments. you cant simply admit you were wrong, replying to one poster and thinking it was someone else. instead, you want to reinforce your misdirected comments, whilst doing the >my family were le based rhodesian (((calvinists))) because you have no identity in your genetical soup DNA which is currently classified as (((american))). by your own admission, your ancestors were kike calvinists. you produce a reddit thread to support your argument, followed by an opinion piece by hitler. you proceed to cite subverted nobility line strongholds as some kind of validation to support your argument, whilst completely ignoring all the subversive centuries being waged against the church of christ and the power changes, which predate your arguments starting point. your argument is a total mess, which is expected, because you are repeating knowledge you saw someone else quote on a chan, whilst having no actual reading material of your own to produce. i dont think it would be untrue ot say your opinions and knowledge on rhodesia all came from memes, heavily moderated reddit threads and the occasional youtube video by a literal who wannabe eceleb. im quite frankly, disgusted by your pathetic attempts to sound knowledgeable when you >wont concede you made a mistake when you know you did, rendering your original replies to me void >and think stating post kike subversion via cohenism and post revolution noble and monarchy takeovers and their territories as an adequate supporting evidence to somehow assist you in naming the kikes, whilst simultaineously being at the heart of the kike operations whilst larping like your family were not kikes, but where rhodesians...coming from the specific location where the kike bankers subverted britain from via oliver cromwell and kike money... how can you deny you are not a kike? you are mentally retarded
>>38651 >It is however undeniable that there has been no people in Europe, or off the coast of it to be precise, that has been as monumental in spreading Jewish dominance in the world as the British. you mean, mainland european continent, where all the splits and subversion took place, with protestantism being exported to britain? ok retard. nice reddit spacing too. have another upvote
>>38652 I'm not American, I'm a Boer, as another poster pointed out already having encountered my hatred for Anglos before. I produced a post from the Historian subreddit to prove the point that slavery was not practiced in our Boer Republics, as is a common claim to justify the invasion, which was relevant because you were providing propaganda which is also levelled against us, which is that we treated niggers badly, which is why you are in fact a nigger-lover. It is also hypocritical of your to criticize my source, which is the only one not available in Afrikaans, whilst vouching for the authenticity of your book which couldn't even differentiate between Flemish and Hollandic, entirely different dialects, therefore making it false. How can you deny you're not a kike? You contradict yourself, you contradict Hitler, you call Germanic peoples Jews because they were part of a particular denomination, and you love niggers.
>>38651 >It is however undeniable that there has been no people in Europe, or off the coast of it to be precise, that has been as monumental in spreading Jewish dominance in the world as the British. also, this is irrelevant. that wasnt my argument. my argument was >>38566 >this is the truth. if its connected to britain, functioning outside of britain, and involves territory, its judaic by default. not sure what you think you accomplished. you are either a bot or incredibly retarded
>>38656 The argument regarding Britain started when you started claiming my people, Boer people, were Jews because we were Calvinists.
>>38655 >I produced a post from the Historian subreddit to prove the point that slavery was not practiced in our Boer Republics where did i once even cover that topic? where did i once mention about slavery? i didnt.
>>38655 >book which couldn't even differentiate between Flemish and Hollandic, entirely different dialects, therefore making it false. you have seen one page of a book, and are discussing as you have read more than one page. you have looked at the introduction page with a single quote of relevence to the original comment i replied to. you are so lost, its painful to engage with you
>>38658 Fully read my post, I mean to say the only one available that is not in Afrikaans, it explained precisely where that came from, since you posted a book which espoused propaganda from that period. To clarify once again, common propaganda included we were practicing slavery and the British ended it, or we treated the niggers badly, the latter was present in the picture from your book.
>>38659 One page that contained factual inaccuracies and blatantly obvious propaganda leveled against us during that period.
(22.68 KB 300x400 lol.jpg)
>>38657 >The argument regarding Britain started when you started claiming my people, Boer people, were Jews because we were Calvinists >CALVINS REAL NAME WAS COHEN. >COHEN IS A KIKE NAME. >CALVINISM IS A KIKE BRANCH OF A RELIGION WHICH REJECTS KIKES what dont you understand? your ancestors were either retarded shabbos goys following a kike religion, or they were kikes. you can choose which one, but the answer is the same regardless of choice. they were either kikes by blood, or kikes by religion. choose one
>>38662 All Christian denominations are spiritually Jewish, therefore you are implying not only my Boer ancestors were Jewish, but if you are indeed white, that your own ancestors were Jewish because they themselves were Christian. What don't you comprehend?
>>38661 >One page that contained factual inaccuracies and blatantly obvious propaganda leveled against us during that period. >4 paragraphs on 1 page of a book that contains 80 pages >arguing with encyclopedia britannica ok retard
>>38662 So to clarify once again, you are classifying all Europeans, since all Europeans were Christian at the time, as Jews via your ridiculous implication.
(525.23 KB 557x559 1609500273909.png)
>>38663 if by christian, you mean protestant, then yes, all your ancestors were jewish, if not by blood, then by religion. mine are not. they are catholic. actual catholicism rejects the jews completely.
>>38664 Encyclopedia Britannica claims we spoke Flemish, whilst we spoke Hollandic, your Encyclopedia Britannica was wrong. Also, why would I read an 80 page book when from one page I have already determined there to be factual inconsistencies and propaganda?
>>38665 >So to clarify once again, you are classifying all Europeans, since all Europeans were Christian at the time, as Jews via your ridiculous implication. >all europeans were christian this kike doesnt know the difference between (((protestantism))), catholicism or orthodoxy. >>38667 >we there was no we. stop larping please
(401.71 KB 590x408 ClipboardImage.png)
(1.29 MB 720x960 ClipboardImage.png)
>>38666 Let’s consider for a moment who the early Christians, Apostles, and Disciples were. In the early days of the Church, all of those who were attracted to, followed, and devoted themselves to Jesus were trained, devout Jews. They identified themselves as Jewish. Their training, language, rituals, and ceremonies were handed down from generation to generation from Abraham, through the Torah and into their daily lives. These Jewish traditions shaped the rituals and liturgies of the Catholic Church: For both Jews and Christians Sacred Scripture is an essential part of their respective liturgies: in the proclamation of the Word of God, the response to this word, prayer of praise and intercession for the living and the dead, invocation of God’s mercy. In its characteristic structure the Liturgy of the Word originates in Jewish prayer. The Liturgy of the Hours and other liturgical texts and formularies, as well as those of our most venerable prayers, including the Lord’s Prayer, have parallels in Jewish prayer. The Eucharistic Prayers also draw their inspiration from the Jewish tradition. The relationship between Jewish liturgy and Christian liturgy, but also their differences in content, are particularly evident in the great feasts of the liturgical year, such as Passover. Christians and Jews both celebrate the Passover. For Jews, it is the Passover of history, tending toward the future; for Christians, it is the Passover fulfilled in the death and Resurrection of Christ, though always in expectation of its definitive consummation.( CCC 1096) Yes, you're totally not Jewish.
>>38668 There is none, they're all Jewish religions imposed upon Europeans. Catholicism was merely an earlier one than Protestant denominations, doesn't make it less Jewish.
>>38669 >still talking about christians >still has no idea what christians are no matter the amount of content you post, it doesnt step over the fact your basis of reasoning and knowledge is wrong haahahaha
>>38671 So you're implying that Catholicism is not an inherently Abrahamic, therefore Jewish religion?
>>38670 its the rejection of "jewish"/ "judeaen" / Phariseean beliefs and customs.
>>38672 are you really still strawmanning?
>>38673 Seems like another Jewish false dichotomy to me. So what you are telling me is, that Catholicism is not inspired by Abrahamic beliefs? You are also then telling me, it is not responsible for the eradication of the indigenous European pagan religions?
(1.96 MB 3264x2448 IMG_0628.JPG)
>>38669 >here, look at my 20th century and 21st century photos of a already corrupted house of christ >haha, that will show you beyond salvagable
>>38675 >Seems like another Jewish false dichotomy to me. then you have no theological knowledge whatsoever
>>38676 So you're saying it wasn't corrupted from the beginning since it's predicated upon Abrahamic garbage?
>>38675 >So what you are telling me is, that Catholicism is not inspired by Abrahamic beliefs? You are also then telling me, it is not responsible for the eradication of the indigenous European pagan religions? i stated very clearly the facts. you are using a strawman argument which is about as jewish as you can possibly get, except, this is the toolbook of the marxist leftists. you are out of your depth
>>38677 I have enough knowledge to realize that much of your Catholic ritual can be traced to Babylonian Jews.
>>38678 >So you're saying it wasn't corrupted from the beginning since it's predicated upon Abrahamic garbage? i have not said anything in regards to that point, as you well know. back to reddit you go
>>38679 Which facts did you state? You haven't disproven that Catholicism is an Abrahamic, thus Jewish religion.
>>38680 >I have enough knowledge >cant differentiate between (((christianity))) and cahtolicism >has no idea of the catholic faiths historical timeline try again, retard
>>38683 I don't need to try, because it's apparent to anyone with a triple digit IQ that it's just different denominations of spiritual Jewery. Prove me wrong.
>>38682 the new testament, is a completely different teaching to the old testement. the old testement is the prelude to what happened. christ. then christ was the rejection of the old religions. "jews" were not even a thing in christs times. the term jews is a modern thing. christ was the rejection of pharisees, which was proto-talmudism. but that isnt the point here. you have already demonstrated you have no idea about what you are talking, and you are playing the you said x so you mean Y strawman logical fallacy. if you are too stupid to distinguish facts beyond non existing arguments, just stop typing lel.
>>38687 Except there's no actual proof of your pathetic Christ, it's all just a Jewish con, like your non-existent god. I provided you facts from the Catholic Canon, that state you are related to Jews. The "New testament is different" argument is just a way of saying you're a progressive kike.
(266.25 KB 1297x2005 1328491381.0.x.jpg)
>>38688 >xcept there's no actual proof of your pathetic Christ, it's all just a Jewish con, like your non-existent god. >I provided you facts from the Catholic Canon, that state you are related to Jews. >The "New testament is different" argument is just a way of saying you're a progressive kike. jewish hands typed this post, on reddit, then a jew copy and pasted it here
>>38689 Wow, I give up. There's no arguing with a brainwashed Christian about the fact that they're spiritual Jews. Doesn't even believe his own Catholic Canon, so sad.
>>38688 >I provided you facts from the Catholic Canon, that state you are related to Jews. jews is a modern kiked term for judeaens. there were no jews in christs time. only proto-talmudism, aka the pharisees. judea was land, not a genetic heritage or religion. how do you not know basic theological history? then think you can argue about "facts" regarding theological history? please stop and think for 5 minutes before writing another brainless post
>>38690 > Christian yes, give up. you have no business discussing theology if you cant distinguish a catholic from a christian
(432.80 KB 776x720 Ian Smith - deal with it.png)
Now would be a good time to post this. I can see that we've been visited by troublemakers who, despite their claims to the contrary, are not doing a very good job at masquerading their true motivations, and are trying their damnedest to slide this thread nonetheless. For those who are genuine in soul, please read though and be sure not to feed the obvious trolls https://archive.fo/OSkQ2
>>38698 >"Misunderstandings and lethargy perhaps produce more wrong in the world than deceit and malice do. At least the latter two are certainly rarer." or >"never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity" Hallmarks of cointelpro are certainly here, but that doesn't necessarily prove this fag is a kike. He could just be retarded Maybe I'm just being naive but too often it seems we resort to 'anything I don't agree with is a kike'. I couldn't fathom just how many times my hot takes have been called jewish. Though admittedly, that may have been accusations from actual kikes I guess I was the one that recognized this sperg from the druid/pol thread >>34946 . After acknowledging some of his arguments and politely correcting some of his misconceptions, he was able to make peace with them >>35142. Then seemingly out of nowhere he was back and ranting about slavs being subhuman, 'I ARE MOAR ARYAN DEN U R', and back to his "Death to Britain" shtick. TBO he seemed kinda unhinged, but then again, he has to live surrounded by millions of unbleached niggers, and under their rule. That has to rub off on a man.
>>38706 We certainly have gained an agent or two (who knows or cares which agency) in the last couple weeks. Their subtle influence on the board is unmistakable. They are warping and twisting our conversations with the usual methods.
>>38706 Interesting that immediately after you posted this the board was hit with CP. Agents confirmed.
>>38712 Fair point. Can say without a doubt that the same cp fag was here two months ago. He posted some crap about Indians being better than Whites, when I responded with "better at rapes and cp production" he responded with spam.
(7.66 MB 1280x720 Reeeeeeee.webm)
(1.69 MB 935x943 vehicle gunner.png)
>>38706 I hate to break it to you, but everything you mentioned is characteristic of the shill. It must be his first day shilling, because he literally used most of the tactics in sliding the thread and anger/concern trolling. >>38710 OP here, you are exactly correct. I kinda miss the idea of a /pol/ board using IDs simply because it would be easier for old fags to spot a troublemaker. If what >>38712 is saying is true regarding the spamming of evil and illegal content, then we need to brush up on our comm/op/per-sec (and whatever else I'm leaving out) in order to never be associated with people like that. Always remember, that if someone either lacks like the afforementioned shill OR acts like a cartoon character of a neo-nazi, then it's more likely than not a shill or less likely, an idiot; both of which we cannot allow ourselves to be around lest people will think we are like them. >>38723 I know trannies, communists and other sick faggots post that shit, but do we have any evidence that agents, foreign or domestic, post shit like that too? I thought the law specifically stated that american agents could not post CopyPaper of any kind.
>>38771 Can enable IDs if preferred. They do make convo's easier to follow but with most anons using vpns, found they had less value.
>>38772 It's not the VPNs I'm concerned about, it's about spotting a troublemaker and being better able to ID him. That was how anon's were able to finger that one jackass from FBI who was fedposting about committing illegal acts of terrorism and violence in California. The board owner and the posters need to be wary about all of the risks and how best to mitigate them, otherwise this place might end up like 8chan. BTW, does a VPN change the user's ID with every post? If not, I am not sure how they are not valued. Are you also the board owner?
>>38774 The id's are tied to ip, so if some ip hops daily they will change t. janny
>>38773 ids wont help discussion. in fact, it will cause harm because the more naive users will assume a false sense of trust with an id system which will enable easier trolling for faggots who think theyre special for hopping ips with a vpn or vps. posters are, by far, best identified through post content more than anything else. that is to say, argue with ideas and not personas. midwit posters can be identified through writing patterns and retards through ids, but trolling with even a slight amount of effort isnt so obvious.
>>38776 I think the proof is in the pudding. Post quality on /pol/ has improved since the removal of IDs. I agree with your reasoning as well.
(1.45 MB 640x360 dghgdhdfghgdhgf.mp4)
>>38197 I think a lot of people are completely misunderstood why the praise for rhodesia exists, it wasn't the rhodesian system which was unabashedly capitalist almost reganist but the proof that whites could build something from nothing, build a thriving prosperous state even under international condemnation, sanctions and other limitations even on top of that being under constant siege from communists they stood for years, rhodesia was building a manufacturing Base while their neighbors where falling into ooga booga mud hut anarchy. Then you look at what happened after Ian Smith fell, turned into a complete and utter shithole went from a bread basket to needing internwtional food aid plus turned from a arguble regional power to irrelevant shithole no. 173, saying "Muh anglo-jew" is an insult to the men who proved what could be done, remember their actions not the system itself. Rhodesia shouldn't come back, it'd best serve as a lesson to what will eventually happen in the west when we become a minority, as the saying goes don't cry because it's over smile because it happened, and learn from it. (Same goes for SA).
(1.12 MB 652x743 ominous pic.png)
>>40192 >Rhodesia and South Africa must never return (and the whites should continue to be subjugated) <Yeah no, I think at least, The Afrikaners should find out how to carve out a Nation for themselves within SA.
http://www.therabbith0le.com/enc/HowIanSmithBetrayedRhodesia_excerpt.mp4 Ian Smith was a piece of shit who sold out to communist niggers, just like De Klerk in SA. Here's a Rhodesian and an American who fought in Rhodesia talking about it. Now stop being reactionaries and worshipping traitors like Smith and Verwoerd.
>>38692 ... catholics are christians tho except they absorbed alot of pagan stuff ur still a christ cuck tho mate
(1.84 MB 200x234 terry.gif)
Don't fucking care. This is old garbage. They lost, and so now that the world knows what happens to losers make sure that doesn't happen again because it's about to if everyone who's white don't start pulling up their bootstraps. If you still have aversion to killing because you're a pussy or believe in some christcuck god you're just going to be a liability, just like the boers who were more focused on praying and bullshitting than straight up murdering their literal urukai subhuman nigger opponents who had no cowardly aversions at all like them in the war and kept throwing live grenades into their churches.
nice 4chan post, go back there

Delete
Report


no cookies?