>who the fuck gaves these mentally retarded niggers firearms in the first place?
Maybe it's just people who want to make money? Or governments trying to fight proxy conflicts.
>he social core of jewish ideology is the inverstion of the natural hierarchy. By giving niggers guns, that would allow them to rise up against their superiors thus giving them a degree of independence.
This isn't going to be popular, but jews aren't the only "people" capable of doing things on the international scene. There are many factions out there with their own goals. In this specific case, there are many different factions and even many unaligned individuals looking for profit. There are plenty of resources to sell for guns. Africa is one of the richest continents on earth. It's only problem is niggers.
All that said, and this will be even more unpopular, I don't believe that arming niggers undermines the natural hierarchy or whatever you think should exist. You seem to want an eternal 1950s where the good blacks nod and curtsy and prance about for your amusement. A world where we live in a multi-cultural colonial state where Whites make the blacks do all the work and you read about Harry Truman while your black maid says "yes mistah" and you can ignore the inevitable consequences of the demographic time bomb coming your way.
The truth is that that
is what was unnatural. A natural state is a racially homogenous nation-state with few outsiders. The 1900s were an extremely unnatural state where a small White minority could rule over primitives only because guns had not yet filtered down to them. But that was inevitable. The jews may have created their own artificial environment (the fact that Whites have been weened of our natural and healthy ethnocentrism is deeply unnatural)
but the idea that blacks should fight back against foreign domination is wholly natural and normal and good.
People like to point to that one battle in Mozambique where 55 Rhodesians killed 9000 blacks and say, "Look! The Rhodesians were winning the war! How'd they possibly lose?"
But the truth is far more uncomfortable. The truth is that the Rhodesian security forces had totally lost control over 80% of the country by 1979 and one enterprising black insurgent had blown up their fuel reserves. The only areas that were reasonably
safe were the major cities. But by 1978, even they had come under intermittent mortar attack. Never mind the fact that the roads were constantly being mined by the insurgents. Whites were emigrating by the thousand a month from a population of only a few hundred thousand. It was like the nation was hemorrhaging every single day.
And up until the very end, the Rhodesians refused to recognize that they were in a race war. They thought that they were fighting an ideology embraced by only "the bad blacks" when they should have realized that the only way they'd ever have peace is if they killed them all. But oh no, that would mean that White people have to pick our own fruit!
But by 1978, it was way too late for that.
is the natural order of things. Anything else is a deviation from this. Blacks getting guns was inevitable, regardless if jews exist or not. And the second that blacks can fight back against White oppression, they will. So either kill them all and seize their land (and, oy veh!, have to pick our own fruit!) or don't bother drawing stupid lines on a map. Choke on that.