>>56826
Those that haven't been through it, should refrain from commenting on it.
The best total outcomes were obtained by 'goldilocks' + hiding in plain sight + multiple address location distributions.
That is, the 'intelligence' agencies, and force granted agents (reads: carry guns), are remarkably inefficient and must follow protocol. Design against that protocol. What are some components of those hired-agent-limitations and agency-department-protocols, which can be economically/cost-effectively countered?
Yes, outfit buildings with more mass and metal, but not beyond the form of the building (reads: steel doors on straw houses are money losers that just invite more property damage/costs). Yes, invest in locks, but not beyond casual dead bolts that are cost efficient to maintain (reads: can -you- rekey it? If you can't, you've gone to far down a ad campaign like a libtard overreacting idiot). Yes, invest in high resolution IPcamera CCTV systems, but do so with proper independent wired + power + storage + network control (reads: fully confederated / stand-alone / no cloud system, with own power+networking, and then mount the DVR so it looks like a nothingburger modem-on-a-wall)(reads: does it look expensive, or like a computer? then 'they' will see it and take it, and you'll just be out massive costs again, again like a doomer ad sucker, this time with mass data loss on top of property theft). Yes, have some nice windows, but make sure if 'they' want in, they get in, without damaging the frames more (going overboard can be measured in cost-to-replace in time and money; if you can't replace it efficiently within facility operational costs, you are doing it wrong; buildings are expendable depreciating assets always). Yes, carefully plan your garbage, but do keep document shredding separate: by investing in floorspace elsewhere to queue up destruction and then dispose for $4/bankerbox by any number of shred services (those mobiles destroy 1000x better than any machine -you- can buy at cost, just keep the cold storage off site, else you are an idiot that thinks they can actually have the means to destroy beyond re-assembly, like so many sorry idiots investing in $100-10000 self-service shredders these days). Further, black bag everything non-document and use business dumpsters, as 100.0000% of all pickups are recorded (a consequence of niggertown kikeville welfare nonpayers fucking with the city services; thus go private service, blackbag everything, and if truly paranoid dump at another business's service (which I -hate- but better than on the street)).
Hopefully the reader starts to get the idea: Target the (cat herd) protocols and (retarded) competency of the departments and agents. Build to that. Also, build to business model replacement, and distribute with business entities owning/renting across multiple USPS addresses.
As for actual thieves, commercial contractors (both of which the agencies employ, by bounty and by direct contract of services), and disaster/fire/flood planning, the same model should be followed, with some additions. Everything always floods (keep all 6-12in off floor), nothing survives fires (backup and distribute sites; fires are rated by time and nothing affordable survives the average fire time), thieves are best intimidated (make it look tough, but design it to be replaced at cost; you can't stop stupid, only mitigate emergency restoration). Finally, the commercial contractors and state espionage folks are your biggest threat: If you have these after you, you'll need a security company to actively manage sites with maintained presence. Hire neighbor white men to rotate thru (first effect is by feeding the father-son community they look out for you (your cares are their cares), and second effect is presence maintenance).
All that said, it looks like you're trying to go-it-alone. Good luck with that. It won't work. Everyone sleeps eventually, Breech Bro.