/pol/ - Anti-Capitalism Thread

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, News, History


Name
Säge
Subject
Message

Max message length: 5000

Files

Max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Options
Password

(used to delete files and postings)

Misc

  • Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more
  • Remember to follow the rules

Janitor/Global Moderator/Developer applications are now open! Please email admin@16chan.xyz or message 663 on Twitter if you're interested.

• The 16chan Android App is now live! Follow the installation guide here


 [Return] [Catalog] [Bottom] [Refresh]

(357.80 KB 576x566 capitalist kike.png)
Anti-Capitalism Thread Anonymous 10/07/2019 (Mon) 03:13:12 No. 7444
Let me start the Thread off by saying that I am by no means a communist, socialist, or leftist. I believe that communism and capitalism are two sides of the same jewish coin. I have no problem with private property and businesses as long as they do not harm the race. Now that that disclaimer is over let me get to the actual content of the thread.

I have seen especially on the older chans a fixation on anti-communism, this is certainly warranted, however I believe capitalism deserves a great deal more hate than it gets.

Capitalism (especially jewish capitalism) has brought about a variety of undesirable changes to the western world over a period of several centuries including femenism, communism, an influx of nonwhite immigrants, lack of a family wage, and of course environmental damages.

Femenism was brought about by capitalism as a convenient way to halve wages and double the workforce, by pushing women in the workplace profits go up and as I'm sure some jewish and shabbos capitalists planned stopped mothers from being in the home and raising children and created a divide between the parents and children.

Communism in it's most successful form the USSR was ironically largely a capitalist endeavor with the initial communist revolts in Russia being funded by New York jews.

The influx of nonwhite Immigrants into White nations is partially a reaction to femenism driving down birthrates, partially because jews hate whites, and partially to keep the labor pool larger and to drive down wages, after all John isn't going to demand higher wages when he's still hired and Pablo will work for half of his current pay.

Wages are largely kept down as a result of immigration, when immigration is up, pay goes down, and vice versa. When you put a bunch of immigrants into a country they can't organize, at least not as well as a homogeneous group could, especially not if they speak different languages and their standards for living and pay are radically different. Oh and in the specific case of spics in the US not paying taxes but still benefiting from public services and being handled with kid gloves in court.

Environmental concerns have been almost entirely subverted, environmental orgs have either been bought off or are run by capitalists such as a "donation" by (((David Gelbaum))) of at least $200,000,000 to the Sierra Club in exchange for not advocating against immigration. I'm sure you all have seen many other examples of such things.

TL:DR Communism bad and jewish but Capitalism also bad and jewish.
Important, yet so misunderstood. Early on I thought capitalism was "terrible but still better than anything else" but you look at the policies enacted by Schaft in nazi germany and suddenly you see a better way.

Cultured thug did a great video on the nazi economy, definitely worth a watch
>>7444
I don't know what to add. I'll just bump and keep an eye on this thread
Any human contrived abstraction made to be an axiom to live by will always go against Cosmic Law. That being said, capitalism taken as a policy used in a limited scope within a certain place in time could be put towards servicing Life.

No bad tools, only stupid humans.
>>7444
Corporatism is the problem Anon. You need to understand what a corporation is, how they started, and why they were never disbanded after WW2. Also Crime syndicates their infiltration of corporations. than you will have a better understanding.
(155.62 KB 1066x543 DLi--2eVwAADn8Y.jpg)
>>7444
You hit the nail on the head. I agree completely with this, and I think in the United States at least it's very easy to lose yourself hating Communism alone. Keep in mind there's plenty wrong with Capitalism as well, and what we're seeing is the final stages of it. Socialism and other flavors of Communism are gaining traction as much as they are because other people see the system on it's way out and have trouble clarifying what exactly it is we should be doing. To me, it's simple -- we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children Anything else is a misdirection of our purpose in life. When we import cheap labor, we betray our people. When we let our own folk die of disease and drugs, we betray them. I think it's very easy to decry anything group effort, but at the same time we have to remember that we are strongest as a people, acting in unison -- something a purely economic model of business can't give us. Pic related, some wise words from Uncle.
(140.62 KB 337x338 communist neoliberal alliance.png)
Capitalism also allows enemies and traitors to gain huge amounts of wealth and influence, largely unchecked.

The principles of modern neoliberalism, and even neoconservatism, say that the individual's right to amass wealth is the primary right of citizens. In theory, the believe that the rich will just use their wealth to grow their own businesses, hire more employees, and make better products; and will just largely be neutral individuals who don't try to coerce the general population politically. In reality though, the rich use their wealth to influence politics, the media narrative, and ultimately the government.

Neoncons, and white boomers in general, are actually against identity politics; and largely stay away from things like "social engineering", especially race-based stuff. The left and nonwhites on the other hand use their wealth to fund anti-white social movements and empower their own races' ethnocentric organizations, such as the ADL, CAIR, La Raza, BLM, etc. This leads to a de facto power disparity between conservative whites and the anti-white left, with most conservative white boomers being too afraid to flex their power and wealth to their own advantage. Several decades of this process continuing is what led to the shitty society we have today.

TL;DR: Capitalism is abused by anti-whites in order install social structures that limit the freedom and prosperity of whites.
>>7752
An example of this playing-out is how the corporation Google is extremely wealthy, is staffed by Jews, libcucks, and shitskins; and uses its wealth and control over media to actively censor and deplatform white nationalists; and support open-borders politicians.

Meanwhile, Exxon may be staffed and controlled by white male boomers; but they don't do anything with their wealth to promote pro-white politics or really even American civic nationalism. In short, they are less-willing to use their power than the pozzed left.
>>7752
>In theory, the believe that the rich will just use their wealth to grow their own businesses, hire more employees, and make better products
That isn't a theory -- that's just the propaganda they put out. Capitalists know full well that isn't the point.
bump
writing post but thread may slide before can finish proper reply
>>7444
The problem with your argument is you miss the core problem with communism.

It's an intellectual contagion. It seems like a solution, but lacks any way to handle human nature. So fags always push for it and fags are always killed because of it when it finally gains power.

If you want the best system open a fucking Bible and understand that all people worship something. Aim that at God or you and yours will suffer.

It's not God because a jerk. It's just how things work. Like your mom telling you to wipe your ass. If you don't it's not your mom that punsihes you severely...it's the rash and the smell that turns others against you and your own body against yourself.

Capitalism, communism, whatever. As long as there aren't objective morals we can agree on nothing will ever work.

Ever.
>>7978
Amen. Bumping
capitalism,communism, fascism, socialism are the 4 failed economic systems of the most corrupt form of government the wolds everknown a democracy. comes from the greek word demon!
>>7978
This thread isn't about communism and it's problems though, it is about capitalism and it's problems. I'm going to try to not derail the thread by getting into a religious debate but it also seems like you brought up Christianity for no reason.
>>8138
National Endowment of Democracy (CIA)
>>7444
The Irony is you are using the fruits of capitalism to post this.
>>8138
>comes from the greek word demon!
Demo means people
>>7444
Man I agree with this word for word. Amazing. My friend at work always agrees jews are the problem but when I tell him who runs capital he's at a lost for words because he loves the idea of getting more and more shekels.
>>8387
>How can you criticise x when you have y because of it BOTTOM TEXT take that libtard.

Did you read the OP? I said I had no problem with private property and businesses as long as they are not harmful to the White race.

>>8393
>falling for obvious bait
>>8417
let me apologize for my obvious troll comment. I read the OP and I agree with 97% of the points you made. I made that comment just based on the title. The post is not really Anti capitalist. or let us use the proper term the free market system. There is nothing wrong with that. Buying and trading goods and innovative inventions to further the progress of humanity. Your problem is with corporatism. My problem is with corporatism. In the pursuit of more wealth and power corporatism is pushing for globalism. That leads to all your points. The corporations quest for globalism has been on their todo list for over 300 years. East India trade company comes to mind. And at its core Jews. Every time. Through Rook or crook. They will try to achieve their goal. So if they can't politically out maneuver you. They will rob you. And that is the two sides of the same coin, capitalism on one side and communism on the other. Both end up creating bloated corrupt government. In the end the people suffer. I have seen both for what they really are. You also mentioned the two sided coin. Now for the elephant in the room. What do we do about it? We all see it. America is sucking on this poisoned tit. I believe let the poison do it's job. It has to collapse. America won't wake up until they are standing in line for hours on a soup line.
>>7444
Communism and capitalism are reconciled via nationalism.

There is nothing wrong with a strong welfare state as long as the benefits are reserved for the state's primary ethnicity.

There is even less wrong with capitalism so long as its given a nationalistic focus.
i.e. limitations on ownership for those outside the primary ethnicity as well as tarrifs and severe restrictions on the activities of multi-nationals (including those that start in your own country).
>>8481
>There is even less wrong with capitalism so long as its given a nationalistic focus.
The focus is globalisation now. Many American companies were bought by foreign corporations. Burger king is owned by a British cooperation. So a Nationalistic country is a road block to the agenda. We enjoy the fruits of the free market system. Things we take for granted. But these are the very things corporations are running into the ground. Utilities such as clean water and sewage treatment. The power grid. The corporations are not putting and money into upkeep until a gas line blows up.
>>8487
You are right, but there's another, even larger problem, which serves to maintain the status quo:

The only reason why planet earth is able to support so many humans is due to the precise logistics enabled by capitalism.

Suffice to say, most cities exist in what could be called an "unnatural population density", by which I refer to the fact that it takes way WAY more land to support a human that what is available to each human in a city, hence their reliance on outside support in exchange for what I'd tentatively call "value" from urban industries.

What this means is that the survival model of primitive humans (i.e. grow/find your own food) has been completely replaced by "survive by getting money", and that change cannot be reversed by even a tiny amount without triggering a mass casualty event.
anarcho-capitalism is best capitalism
>>8891
All of the "Anarcho hyphen" political philosophies are equal to communism in terms of being pipe-dreams.

The fundamental unanswered question that each of those variants have in common is, "If you have no government to enforce anarcho-X, then what would stop a group of people from conquering their neighbors and forming a new government?"

contrasted with the other question:
"If you DO have a centralized enforcement body for the purposes of enforcing the anarcho-X "system", then how is that different from a government?"
>>9012
I've thought as you say there but taken it further mate, so follow along. What's then to prevent your natsoc gov't or the one that allegedly replaces the anarchos from being taken over? It's the same logic and really no one has any solution to this. Yes, a group of people could come together and re-create a state if there is "anarchy" (not my favorite word to describe it btw but that's what others use). But then that state could also become bigger, and then we just end up with the same garbage we have today. So saying that anarcho-capitalism (or any anarcho-ism) could form a state I don't think is stating as much of a problem as critics might think it is.

And of course then what's to stop a smaller state from being conquered until there is one big empire?

Also, they could have a privately owned military company or nonprofit to defend against states attacking.

The other thing is that I think most people (including ancaps themselves) maybe don't realize how much an ancap society would probably end up being like a state, just with allowing more competition and private ownership of government pieces. It could literally be something like Amazon owns your local courthouse, Domino's builds your roads, Google owns public schools... you'd still end up paying for using these services, which would be equivalent to taxes, only allowing you to opt out or choose among competitors and the "taxes" would be cheaper due to competition is the hope.
(83.57 KB 499x499 ancap consent.png)
>>8891
We get it, you want to fuck children.
>>7444
another kike commie thread

capitalism is great, it's the jews meddling with it (fed, etc) so to make it look bad. now, begone!
>>7444
What a shit-tier thread this is.
You have no clue about what you are even talking about.
Capitalism is an ideal, not an economic system. The Ideals associated with capitalism died out in the late 1800's. If you bothered to study up on your subject, I wouldn't be schooling you on "your" subject.
The term "Capitalism," as used today, was defined by that fucking Jew, Marx, and was created to be a wedge issue, to drive a wedge between jewish socialism (Jews get everything, the goy get nothing) which is what the jews need to thrive because they are low IQ vermin, and free-market, meritocratic, accumulation of wealth that takes hard work (something that jews know nothing about), dedication (another thing that jews know nothing about), and BRAINS (something that the jews don't have). The average IQ of Ashkenazi jews in that shitty little country, Israel is 94. Let that sink in.
Read a fucking book, nigger, and learn to think about the real issues, in a more thoughtful way, instead of jumping on the SJW bandwagon of complaining about something that you have no knowledge about.
Reading stupid shit like this, and the posts that support it, shows me that the fucking KIKES have won.
Enjoy your ignorance and slavery, you stupid slaves to the jew.
With sheer ignorance as demonstrated in this thread, it is only a matter of time before you all end up dead, in jail, or doing hard time at a jew labor camp.
>>9489
Read the fucking OP retard, not only do I hate commies, I have no problem with private property or businesses as long as they do not harm the race.
>>9508
>wow this thread sucks you're retarded read a book
Amazing. You said so much but also nothing at all. I am aware the term "capitalism" was coined by the first commie jew but it is a good term to describe the rampant quest for money/power of many jews in the country today. Anyways, please. Elaborate on what you mean in this post. Refute my points or further explain what you mean instead of shit flinging.
>>9489
>t-that's not true capitalism!
Do you not so how much you have in common with your comrades on the other side of the shekel?
>>7444
Free market was good
Free market was subverted by jews.
Free market became capitalism and demonized by the jews who would simultaneously benefit from it while promoting socialism to the masses. Through control of the media they maintain the illusion of capitalism vs socialism balancing as they see fit giving them the ability to manipulate world finance always to their gain. Socialism was invented by jews to subvert nations. Capitalism without jews works. Socialism only serves jews.
Capitalism will only work if we cut off the parasites.
>>7444
Bumping for truth. One of the bigger problems is that many here still unconsciously identify with capitalism as /ourguys/, when they really aren't. Hell, at this point the average Third Positionist has far more in common with a real communist than some Jeff Bezos-worshipping patriotard.
>>8138
>comes from the greek word demon!
Lol no it doesn't.
>>8387
The Nazis were much more technologically advanced than the capitalist nations.
>>9489
>capitalism is great, it's the jews meddling with it (fed, etc) so to make it look bad. now, begone!
Fuck off boomer.
>>9489
>capitalism is great, it's the jews meddling with it (fed, etc) so to make it look bad. now, begone!
Fuck off boomer.
>>9165
Are you actually retarded? What prevents it being taken over is state military & intelligence services, combined with a far more accountable model of government than what we have now.

> It could literally be something like Amazon owns your local courthouse, Domino's builds your roads, Google owns public schools

Oh wait, you're a kike who actually thins this is a good idea lmao.
>>9685
>Capitalism without jews works.
No it doesn't. Aristocracy is the only form of government that works.
>>9508
'Capitalism" was indeed a term coined by Marx himself as a strawman for the critique of Western society. It's actually a good term though for other anti-Capitalists to use (and look at how much it triggers little cuckservatives like you), so we do. Get over it. Stop trying to push your retarded Left vs Right politics & go back to quarterchan.

>With sheer ignorance as demonstrated in this thread, it is only a matter of time before you all end up dead, in jail, or doing hard time at a jew labor camp.

Imagine thinking serving jews (like the Fed) is rebelling against jews.
(417.02 KB 915x657 1_XRa2SMveRrEtfEyfODHrcA.png)
>>8387
>The Irony is you are using the fruits of capitalism to post this.
This has to be the single most retarded thing anyone can write and republicans deserve to be exterminated for their retardation no exceptions.

Let me give you a counter question of your own logic
>The Irony is you are using the fruits of ZOG(internet, utilities, living in the US) to post this.

You literally make no sense if you think this makes sense you are certifiably retarded. There is no irony, there is a tragedy of how retarded you are.

Fagots like you only exist for leftists to laugh at.
(188.84 KB 1024x765 Anarcho capitalism = feudalism.jpg)
(892.13 KB 1280x1163 Trivial.png)
I'm a hard socialist.
>>9012
agree.
>contrasted with the other question:
>"If you DO have a centralized enforcement body for the purposes of enforcing the anarcho-X "system", then how is that different from a government?"

I can not applaud this more all Anarcho crap is like this they literally will establish a government only not say this government is "the state" so its ok. Regardless how insane and tyrannical this government will be they will take it up the ass.

All debates end like this.
The idea of anarchy whatever is based on the stupid idea of something named a state existing what this state is or how their government will not be the state is never explained.

If you question them about this with things like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fibDNwF8bjs
you end up with them simply proposing government and asking how this is not this magical state will result in the same age old comedy.

The idea of anarchy makes no sense because its random screaming and pipe dreams, same for communism who is not the USSR! Its(communism) something where everyone can do whatever he wants and everything according to his need...

These things make no sense whatsoever.

Anarcho capitalism is so obviously retarded that you simply need to ask how these land owning corporations or capitalists are not the government.
See the pictures who kill the anarcho capitalist really fast.
<So how is this not feudalism?

I call myself a socialist because I don't want some fantasy land I want to reform things, and all the republican/liberterian/ancap idiot will scream
<SSSSOOOOOOCCCCCIIIIIIAAAAALLLLIIIIISSSSTTTTTTT
<EEEEEVVVVVIIIIILLLLLLL
at everything.
Capitalism is cancer
>>8891
>le if i don't bother anyone, they won't attack me XD


anarchism is about there being a lack of government or rules, no one cares about offending others, it's pure survivalism, which is why anarchism is retarded, no identity or type of people can survive without control or focus.
Literally I did not even read this thread. Youre a fucking idiot. You must labor for your fruit in all that you do. Thats biblical and societal. How is the internet you use to post this thread being paid? Nothing in life is free. Please reevaluate.
>>12433
Dumb nigger read literally the first three sentences of the OP.
>>11039
The image you posted is so retarded, I won't even bother reading your post.
Complaining about Apple while using apple products is seriously retarded
and then he's suddenly turned into a retard who hates inventions.
Apple products are really overpriced and people buying them either have too much money or are too retarded to spend the few bucks they have well.
You could get a 200$ phone that's just as good as the newest IPhone or even better in the aspects that count for people today. (processing power, graphics chip)
And 4k on a phone gets you nowhere because you need a high end computer to render fluid things to it and mobile bandwith isn't as good as a cable either.
You're such a reddit nigger, just kill yourself.
>>12433
>Nothing in life is free.
It could be free. It only comes at a one time cost of laying the cables.
In my country most people use the internet over infrastructure that is decades old.
So basically ISP monopolies are just usuring people.
They even install new copper cables to stop progress. lmao
>>7444
Nice trips, wage thieft is very common in retail jobs so make sure you collect all your shift receipts especially when you have overtime (try to avoid overtime if you could)
(455.11 KB 640x480 345345.png)
>>12462
>I won't even bother reading your post
This is your problem.

>Apple
Is crap. I agree same what you did say for phones.

>and then he's suddenly turned into a retard who hates inventions.
I see you don't understand the point of the comic or did not read what i was saying.

The point is :
Person P is a hypocrite (this is a bad thing) if person P criticizes X and yet is/uses X.

And this is the dumbest thing you can ever say.
Read my ZOG example. You criticize ZOG yet you live in ZOG how hypocritical of you.

>retard who hates inventions.
This is the logical conclusion of the "you are a hypocrite checkmate" logic. Want to do it for historical things?

<What you say we should use these cars instead of horses? Yet there are no cars made today (because its the old times)!
<Yet you only use horses for transportation how hypocritical of you!

Same for the
<You say capitalism is bad?
<Yet you use things from capitalism! Checkmate!

Yes its this stupid if we did not realize things are bad and wanted to improve them we would go nowhere. And the same for capitalism. Its to be replaced because its bad.

>IPhone
Great example iPhones are crap and overpriced they should not be allowed to be made, they are the perfect products of .... (you don't have a word for it and its different from capitalism) chaoticism that you and I live in (capitalism is one example of it there are other variants and possible examples).

To put it simply everyone is here to fuck everyone else over. And this results in stupidity. Steve jobs makes iPhone garbage that is made to break fast so you must buy a new iPhone. And the iPhone deliberately is made to not have replaceable batteries despite the fact that earlier phones did have them and can have them.

You are getting garbage because some CEOs and investors want to get rich and get more money.

This can be trivially fixed by the government saying(we live in a mixed socialist economy) that
<You must make a phone with replaceable standard batteries

Only the capitalists like Steve Jobs or Tim Cook of apple (or whoever is the CEO there now) will fight this because they will not make that much money if they don't sell crap phones that break.

Another phone crap closed markets, it should be illegal for there to be apple store unless it can be installed on other phones so you don't buy a phone simply because you want to use its store.
Think of it like launchers on the PC you can install
Steam
Epic
Blizzard
EA
on AMD and Intel without a problem.

And it should be illegal to make super phones (we can excuse the granny phone that can not install anything in it outside of snake and java games) who block the installation of other stores.

The only opposition to this is
<I want rich capitalists to sell me garbage that is bad and fuck me over so they can have more money

And its dumb as fuck.

Chaoticism is everyone fighting to fuck one another over and make more money. And this is simply stupid a society or country should work together and laws should not be made to reward everyone who engages in socially destructive behaviors like the capitalist fuckery.
>>12660
>>7449
I used to be a full on tankie. Today i would say my political ideology is extremely nazi, i have some eco care, but i promote national capitalism. Hitler's economic system, take out the socialism and replace it with debt free capitalism based off of monetaristic beliefs.
(41.65 KB 474x444 picture.jpeg)
>>10147
I love my buicks but the nazis had brilliant cars too. Yeah, the nazis were just as advanced, actually much more. the beetle, ferdinand porsche, that automotive union car that had that massive upturned v12, rocket programs, most of the ussr's and the usa's space engineers coming from a fallen nazi germany, the panzerfaust and the luger, the 911. and that's just their pleb tier stuff. Sure the usa was too with the buick nailhead and other cars, sure the ussr was too with tatras, but the nazis had some grand shit.
(42.27 KB 474x358 picture.jpeg)
>>8011
>>12675
Although the wankel rotary was a grave mistake.
>>7444
You are a communist pretending to be a friend. Only communists take the time to focus on capitalism as evil or immoral, and arguments such as:
>Femenism was brought about by capitalism
>the USSR was ironically largely a capitalist endeavor
Are taken wholesale from communist writings. Communists never take possession of their own failures and instead blame capitalists.
You probably use terms like neoliberal too.
>TL:DR Communism bad and jewish but Capitalism also bad and jewish.
This is the atheistic approach of conversion to a faith. That is to say, as a Muslim may try to convert Christians to his faith by first making them believe all religions are lies and bad (convert to atheism) before converting them to Islam, you are a communist trying to convert your opposition to your faith by first getting them to abandon their economic policies and core beliefs about property, so that in their nihilism they are open to communism.
>>7449
>>7676
Morality doesn't enter into it. Capitalism is good because it can be modeled mathematically, and produce tangible results. In other words, it is more than a pipe dream like communism, it actually produces something.
>>7752
>neoliberalism
Better take a shot of whiskey. I called it. Commies are among us.
>>8253
This thread is about converting "fascists" into communists under the guise of getting "fascists" to admit that capitalism has flaws, and make them nihilists open to communism.
>>8417
Of course you have a problem with private property and business. Those are bedrocks of capitalism. You wouldn't be condemning capitalism (what must come about when individuals can own own possessions and come together in agreement and work businesses) if you agreed with right to own things and freely associate in ways which produce more property.
>>8479
>>12666
Corporatism naturally flows from the basic axioms of capitalism. To abolish corporatism you need a strong, centralized government. Now, anon, what does history tell us about centralized governments?
They become communist or otherwise totalitarian.
>>12746
>You are a communist pretending to be a friend.
I'm a National Socialist, anti-capitalist and anti-communist.
>Are taken wholesale from communist writings. Communists never take possession of their own failures and instead blame capitalists.
Possibly, there is probably an earlier date for feminism but I was more focused on post WWII women in the workplace which to my knowledge stemmed from rosie the riveter type propoganda. The soviets were funded by jewish capitalists in new york, trotsky was even from new york along with lots of other communists. The jew changes outward ideology as easily as a set of clothes, his skin of zionism hiding underneath.

Perhaps I was not clear in defining capitalism in the thread title, it refers to the materialism and obsession with money that goes along with it that consumes the current American and European societies.
I don't get how neoliberal is a term that can only be used by communists.
>This thread is about converting "fascists" into communists under the guise of getting "fascists" to admit that capitalism has flaws, and make them nihilists open to communism.
National Socialists are anti-capitalist, even Benito Mussolini acknowledged that capitalism had flaws with his idea of "Supercapitalism" which is largely what we are seeing now.
>Of course you have a problem with private property and business. Those are bedrocks of capitalism. You wouldn't be condemning capitalism (what must come about when individuals can own own possessions and come together in agreement and work businesses) if you agreed with right to own things and freely associate in ways which produce more property.
I said I don't have a problem with private property and businesses as long as they do not harm the White race. I wouldn't exactly call that having a problem with private property and business. Do you happen to be some type of Libertarian?
>>12666
>I see you don't understand the point of the comic or did not read what i was saying.
Or you interpreted the comic wrongly and did not notice that the author is a fucking faggot.
>criticizes X and yet is/uses X.
That only applies if you have the choice.
Being part of a population under the same laws isn't a choice.
Consuming less is a choice. What do you think they brought the niggers into europe for? It's so they buy more IPhones.
What do they buy it with? Social money. Or white niggers just work too much enabling the merimutts who control this place in the first place.
Wiggers need to work less and look for hobbies other than consuming. Then the whole system will crumble.
But instead they are like:
Oh god! A crisis. I need to work more!
>they should not be allowed to be made
I don't really see a problem with that in itself.
If someone sells horseshit to a retard for a mountain of gold. So be it.
If it's a woman or a child, you just need laws that allow you to undo the exchange in the case they do something retarded like we have in Germany (sadly not for women anymore because muh equality).
><You must make a phone with replaceable standard batteries
And next every tablet is required to be part of the cellular network so the batteries can be replaced ;)
>Think of it like launchers on the PC you can install
Lad, have you ever heard of piracy? Or private servers?
>who block the installation of other stores
*which
Stores are retarded in general. Either you can add repositories like on linux or you download over the browser.
Operating systems shouldn't provide any form of money transactions either.
>And this is simply stupid a society or country should work together
Guess what Hitler did? And he even build reeducation camps, just so you can have replaceable batteries.
And don't forget interest. It's the cause why there is more debts than money.
>>12746
>Capitalism is good because it can be modeled mathematically
Prove this. Go on show everyone.
Because what I and I think everyone who criticizes capitalism understands under capitalism is this.
There is the intel corporation you have special people on top of the corporation who can do whatever they want (CEO, investors, stockholders) they have practically no limit and get payed lots of money you on the other hand wage slave worker are payed minimal amounts of money and need to show up to work every day on time, if you ever worked in a small business whit one owner you quickly realize the owner is incompetent and often will not show up to work on time or even at all in some days.

The thing is simple there are only 2 kinds of people (3 if you want to be specific) these who want to be on top and these who want to be on the bottom. And the movement is only for the tops (you can insert alpha iconography here if you like).

Either you want to be on the top or you want to be on the bottom. Same for every exploitative system. You want to be a slave or be a slave owner?

You want to be a pleb or a noble?
Want to be a corporate drone or in the top?

Because this is what it is about, the capitalists will give me all they have or its no dice. And I'm sure to find lots of friends who want to be on the top with me. We simply divide the resources equally among ourselves while we kill the capitalists.

Don't want to be part of it? Have a submissive fetish? No worries bottom we got you covered we simply make you our bitch and you work a 20h work day every day 24/7 this is what you get.

This reminds me of a libertarian who was talking about human nature and that desire and greed can not be stopped. Yea right.
You have 10 bananas and are a cunt about it. I distract you while my friend beats you with a stick and I join in beating the living shit out of you.
I get 5 bananas my friend gets 5 bananas and you get no bananas and are dead. To bad it was human nature.
Can't stop human desire there. Greed can simply be not controlled there buddy. Can't fight human nature :)

<muh aristocracy
Look at me fagot, I'm the king now, I declare myself to be the king and my friends to be the new nobility you are a pleb and to worship the ground I walk on. I also confiscate 99% of what you have, pay your taxes to me the king pleb!

What don't like aristocracy now? To bad bottom this is what you where shilling with capitalism and aristocracy.

Look at me wage slave I'm the CEO now, go back to work wage slave.

>>13020
>I don't get how neoliberal is a term that can only be used by communists.
The guy you are talking to is clearly delusional from the anti-communist propaganda he was indoctrinated with.

>Do you happen to be some type of Libertarian?
I bet the guy you are talking to is simply a republican who huffed to much anti-communist propaganda, libertarians grow out of these types or are the children of these types of people.
(89.45 KB 1000x1048 communistball (2).jpg)
>>7444
>trips of truth
nice man
have a bump for an anti capitalist thread not made by a communist cuck
>>13865
kek look at this newfag. he's posting from tor you absolute unit
>>13874
everybody needs to feel superior to everyone else. this is why we will always have niggers amongst us. thanks
>>13738
Of course the communist immediately resorts to threats of murder and severe subjugation. Yes Gulags are a real thing we won't forget or forgive about. You're pure sociopaths that will get nowhere and this is a white nationalist board.
>>7444
>Femenism was brought about by capitalism as a convenient way to halve wages and double the workforce, by pushing women in the workplace profits go up and as I'm sure some jewish and shabbos capitalists planned stopped mothers from being in the home and raising children and created a divide between the parents and children.
This point needs refinement because one could argue that pulling women outside of their homes slashed the sales of the crapware/tupperware they used to buy.
It has to be argued that they still bought a lot of that despite not being at home, but the utensils had to be more practical for the modern woman, easier to use, starting with food cooking by women returning from the workplace.
Once that point is covered, we can safely return to the other correct argument that pushing women outside of the home did pit them against men, lowering the wages of both groups.
This process was ironically already started during the industrial revolution to some extent.
There was a time when men were "secretaries" too.
Capitalism is Universalized Talmudism

CAPITALISM IS UNIVERSALIZED TALMUDISM
Please point me to where Moses Mordecai Levi "Karl" Marx named the Capitalist Jews, named the Jewish bankers, in Das Kapital.
thx
>>13937
>This process was ironically already started during the industrial revolution to some extent.
I think everyone understands that capitalism started in the industrial revolution.
>>13925
>Yes Gulags
Nothing wrong with that, no apologies. You are begging to be enslaved so you get enslaved, eat a dick slave.

> immediately resorts to threats of murder and severe subjugation
Go back to your youtube channel sargon!
And remember to drink your soy and disavow all violence.
>>10147
>The Nazis were much more technologically advanced than the capitalist nations.
Debatable. They were very good at cutting through red tape and had some impressive designs but of course not everything was a slam dunk and "technology", even in the context of war, is an incredibly broad umbrella and even the "correct" answers are contentious.

I mean jesus, just look at JUST prominent small arms in the European theater and leave out crew-serviced weapons and anything .50 or above.

>Full-power rifles
Garand is the best throughout the war, followed by the Enfield No IV, the K98K following and the M91/30 bringing up the rear; the British attempts at upgrading to a semi-automatic rifle are middling, the SVT-40 was okay but poorly deployed and rapidly depreciated and the Gew. 41 and 43 are basically shit but the Germans take a different tack so it's not quite apples to apples.

>Intermediate-caliber rifles
The US holds the early lead with the M1 carbine before being bettered by the Stg. 44 a few years later and then the SKS comes along and takes the crown at the end of the war. The VG 1 is too shoddy to bring up and an honorable mention goes to the M2 carbine, which was lighter and more accurate than the SKS and came with 30-round magazines but lost out on lethality and saw almost no service in Europe anyway.

>Submachine guns
The MP38 and MP40 were dramatically better basically everything else and had their opponents scrambling to catch up. The Americans achieved a comparable result by replacing the clunky Thompson with the M3 grease gun and the Brits had their workmanlike STENs but the PPSh. 41 was probably the best submachine gun of the war to see any real service and its siblings were almost as well regarded. The honorable mention in this category goes to the Swedish K, which missed the party but was such an outstanding weapon that US special forces used it for the next thirty years.

>Service pistols
The Americans entered and exited the war with a good sidearm, the Russians entered and exited the war with a serviceable sidearm (cribbed directly from Browning designs) intended to replace a 45 year-old revolver which ended up sticking around until the new millennium in government service anyway, the British entered and left it with their Webley and the Germans entered it with the P-08 (which is beautiful but absolute ass as a weapon of war) and the much more reasonable P-38. However, the best sidearm of the war was EASILY the Browning Hi-Power. Accurate, balanced, durable and with a capacity of 13+1, nothing of the period really compares. It was used by the Wehrmacht, but in relatively limited numbers and is by no stretch of the imagination an innovation of the reich.
>>10147
>Panzer I were shit T-26 were superior in the Spanish war, Rommel replaced them with any damaged motorized vehicle he could get his hands from the Brits and the japs captured them from the Chinese nationalist army.
>panzer III was outclassed by the T-34s and was mainly used as support for Panzer IV's during the eastern front against anti-tank units and equipment.
>tiger I was a gas guzzler, was easily immobilized on snow and mud and was expensive to repair.
>>7444
Presented with No Comment
>>13020
>I'm a National Socialist, anti-capitalist and anti-communist.
You're a communist. Look at the language you use. You're acting in bad faith by pretending to be what you are not.
> it refers to the materialism and obsession with money
That is a communist argument. Communists are concerned with the moral dimensions of capitalism, because they need converts.
>as long as they do not harm the White race
There you go. You DO have a problem with private property then.
>Do you happen to be some type of Libertarian?
It doesn't matter what I am to you. I don't need a collective identity to feel strong. I already am.
>>13738
http://pages.hmc.edu/evans/chap1.pdf
Gee, that wasn't hard to find.
Now try to find a successful model of the soviet union's economy, or pol pot's economy. Or the Venezuelan economy.
>There is the intel corporation you have special people on top of the corporation who can do whatever they want (CEO, investors, stockholders) they have practically no limit and get payed lots of money you on the other hand wage slave worker are payed minimal amounts of money and need to show up to work every day on time,
Sounds a bit like a biological system being played out in the material world of economics. What, you thought that civilization wasn't beholden to natural law? Humans are not equal to each other because they are different from each other. On top of that random chance gives some people advantages over others. This is much how evolution works, and capitalism mimics it because it is beholden to biology.
>You want to be a pleb or a noble?
I'm the one who watches you silly apes argue and murder each other over bananas while I laugh and shrug.
Economics isn't concerned with what should be, or what is moral. Economics simply is. When you grow up a little and learn to separate what you want from what is available, you will get it.
>>13020
... Adolf Hitler's NASDAP (so called National Socialism) was not anti-capitalist.

>>14621
Okay now try to find a successful model for free market capitalist nationalism with no government involved. You are really so deluded to believe that paper money and the toys with it means everything. Why are you even on pol, honestly? We are nationalists, you can go back to 4chan to be a boomer there.
>>14621
>look at the language you use
Yes, please just attack the language and ignore the arguments without pointing out any examples of the language used.
>That is a communist argument. Communists are concerned with the moral dimensions of capitalism, because they need converts.
You do know communism is a materialist ideology too right?
>There you go. You DO have a problem with private property then.
<Just let jewish bankers import a shit ton of Africans and poison the minds of the public goy, don't you respect private property and the "free market"?
Fuck you


 [Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Delete
Report/Ban

Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)


no cookies?